Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Adoption / November 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

'A niece lived on the same street and I didn't know'

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Lilmtncbn - 27 Nov 2005 13:57 GMT
http://www.mykawartha.com/ka/news/kawartha_lakes/story/3181470p-3685863c.html

'A niece lived on the same street and I didn't know'
Woman's search for birth family would have been much easier under new
law
Nov 25, 2005

Lance Anderson - More from this author

Recent changes to Ontario's adoption laws would have made Shirley
O'Grady's search for her birth family a lot easier.

She spent years investigating the whereabouts of her family when all
she needed was a simple form stored securely in Thunder Bay.

In less than 18 months, that hospital birth record will be made
available to adoptees looking to find their birth families. Even though
Ms O'Grady, 65, found her roots, she still can't wait for the day when
she can receive the birth record.

"Being an adoptee is like living with amnesia because you just don't
know," says Ms O'Grady, co-chair of the local Adoption Disclosure
Support Group.

"For me, it will be so special to hold that document in my hand; a
document my mother signed saying I was born."

She reunited with her birth family 13 years ago. She searched Ontario
extensively for her birth mother and, ironically, found her living
nearby, along with her lost brothers and sisters.

Ms O'Grady spent a lot of time searching records and cemeteries,
starting from where she was born in Kirkland Lake. Eventually she
placed an ad in the Toronto Star's former People Search column and was
contacted by her birth sister.

"She read the column on a Saturday and saw my mother's maiden name and
decided to phone me. Within three days we had the whole story put
together."

She was 52 when she finally met her mother, who had put her up for
adoption at the age of five. Ms O'Grady says the reunion was wonderful
and they spent two years getting to know each other before her mom took
ill. She later died in Ms O'Grady's arms. Today, she remains close to
two sisters living in Bethany and two brothers, one in Ajax and the
other in Oshawa.

Ms O'Grady says the strangest result of her search was learning her
birth family lived close to her in Peterborough and she didn't even
know it.

"My birth mother was in Peterborough, but had to be moved to a nursing
home in Lindsay ," says Ms O'Grady.

"But I had a niece living on the same street in Peterborough and I
didn't even know it."

Her search ended happily but, she says, would have concluded a lot
sooner had she been able to access her birth record. Ms O'Grady
explains that when someone is born in the hospital, the mother fills
out a live birth report and signs it. She adds that document is known
as the original birth certificate or birth report. That is the document
that is sealed in Thunder Bay and the one Ms O'Grady, and other
adoptees, have fought the government to release.

According to a Toronto Star story, more than 10 years of fighting ended
recently when the Province passed a bill that will open the records to
the public, making Ontario the fourth province to do so. It passed
third reading, but won't be proclaimed into law for another 18 months.

However, there was some opposition to the law, says Ms O'Grady, noting
some parents don't want to be found.

"But they have an option of putting a no-contact veto in place; birth
parents can say if they don't want to be contacted," explains Ms
O'Grady. If adoptees violate the veto, they can be fined, she adds.

The new law will also allow birth parents to access original or current
birth certificates, and the important details they contain.

Cheryl, who didn't want her last name used, co-chair of the Adoption
Disclosure Support Group, says she put her birth son up for adoption in
1968. She found him in 1994 after years of sleuthing.

After she learned his adoptive parents had lived in Peterborough, she
did a house-by-house search. That led her down other paths and
eventually she met him on the west coast. He was 24 at the time.

"I contacted the adopted father...I sent him a letter and he called me
back," says Cheryl.

"I didn't meet him (my son) until the spring of 1995 when I flew out to
British Columbia. We spent a week slowly getting to know each other."

She adds her son has since moved to Ontario and says she was there for
the birth of her grandchildren.

"These changes (to adoption laws) were a long time coming," says
Cheryl.

"It's good for people who want to find answers without the red tape and
anxiety."

According to the Toronto Star article, the Province will launch an
advertising campaign across Canada and the United States to inform
people of the changes to the law, giving people time to put a
no-contact veto in place.
Rhiannon - 27 Nov 2005 16:54 GMT
> http://www.mykawartha.com/ka/news/kawartha_lakes/story/3181470p-3685863c.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> parents can say if they don't want to be contacted," explains Ms
> O'Grady. If adoptees violate the veto, they can be fined, she adds.

This is bad enough, but there's no mention here (nor in any recent
press reports I've read) of the clause embedded in the legislation that
allows for an individual to appeal for a veto to be granted on the
grounds that disclosure would cause 'harm'.
Duh. If someone doesn't want to be found, it's more often than not
because they're afraid disclosure will cause them harm.
Although the jubilant people who get quoted in these kinds of articles
should always have had access to their information, none have actually
been the targets of vetoes. It seems to me that they are missing the
crucial point that under the new legislation not everyone can
automatically expect unrestricted access. It must be a failure of
imagination. Or something.
They need to be reminded of the Three Musketeers motto, "All for One
and One for All".
It worked for the Hell's Angels.

> The new law will also allow birth parents to access original or current
> birth certificates, and the important details they contain.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> "It's good for people who want to find answers without the red tape and
> anxiety."

Huh?
What's that supposed to mean?

> According to the Toronto Star article, the Province will launch an
> advertising campaign across Canada and the United States to inform
> people of the changes to the law, giving people time to put a
> no-contact veto in place.

Yeah, right.
Robin Harritt - 27 Nov 2005 18:34 GMT
> http://www.mykawartha.com/ka/news/kawartha_lakes/story/3181470p-3685863c.html
>
> 'A niece lived on the same street and I didn't know' Woman's search for birth
> family would have been much easier under new law

Mine worked for my business partner in the same building as me. For part of
the time and I'm sure she must have done ticketing work for me as well, as
she has airline ticketing qualifications. But we can't quite seem to exactly
remember each other, perhaps it's the trauma my business partner caused us
both by going broke on a big scale soon after she stared work all those
years ago, long long before I discovered her to be my niece. I also spent
two years at further education college about 200 yards from her mother's (my
sister that is) house. Those kind of coincidences are nowhere as rare as the
privacy loonies would have us belief, when they tell us how essential
adoption secrecy is.

> According to the Toronto Star article, the Province will launch an advertising
> campaign across Canada and the United States to inform people of the changes
> to the law, giving people time to put a no-contact veto in place.

Will that be anything like the almost non-existent publicity for our new
laws here in England & Wales that come in to effect on December 30th?

I wonder just how many of our 500,000 birth mothers here know anything about
the no teeth no penalty ACR veto for birth mothers. I wonder haw many
adoptees know about the rather stricter info veto which is also effectively
a contact veto given that without the info it will be almost impossible to
contact someone who has been adopted (far more difficult than before).
Government promises of publicity can fairly safely be ignored if Ontario's
government is anything like ours here in England.

Robin Harritt

http://harritt.net

.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.