> I thought it important to post this story from the BBC as it shows just how
> abysmal our social work industry is becoming in the UK under Mr Blair's 'New
> Labour' government. Under the new adoption laws a local authority can get
> Bacon Status and additional government grants if they increase their
> adoption figures sufficiently.
Umm...Beacon Status, that should read. See
http://www.dfes.gov.uk/adoption/improvingpractice/beacons.shtml
Essex becomes more and more controversial in some of its adoption work
despite its status.
> Tony wants it doubled. It's starting to look a bit like the 60s all over
> again. I do have to wonder if there could be a connection between a large
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
> Robin Harritt
Rhiannon - 28 Nov 2005 20:46 GMT
> > I thought it important to post this story from the BBC as it shows just how
> > abysmal our social work industry is becoming in the UK under Mr Blair's 'New
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Umm...Beacon Status, that should read.
So I figured.
Though "bacon" suits well enough in the context of government grants,
and the chance for local authorities to get their snouts in the barrel.
See
> http://www.dfes.gov.uk/adoption/improvingpractice/beacons.shtml
>
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> >
> > Robin Harritt
> I thought it important to post this story from the BBC as it shows just how
> abysmal our social work industry is becoming in the UK under Mr Blair's 'New
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> and poor provision for PND, well that and the fact that Essex SS takes
> babies away from adequate parents who have a low IQ.
Sounds very possible. It sucks. Living with this kind of fear would
make any woman feel even more anxious. I'm sure it would exaccerbate
any PND symptoms a woman might have. In fact the fear alone might even
be enough to cause it. Sort of like a self-fulfilling prophesy. This
government really have got it arse-backwards, haven't they?
I know plenty of terrific mothers who've suffered and recovered from
PND who'd have lost their kids under this kind of lunatic scrutiny.
Though most of these were the kind of reasonably well-off, educated
middle-class matrons for whom greater allowance is generally made.
Keep us posted.
> Robin Harritt
>
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
> Robin Harritt
> I thought it important to post this story from the BBC as it shows
> just how abysmal our social work industry is becoming in the UK under
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> PND, well that and the fact that Essex SS takes babies away from
> adequate parents who have a low IQ.
Robin, I don't know why your're surprised. Give government this much
power and then expect it to lay off people? Not a chance.
In the evil United States, the state would never hear that a new mother
had post-partum depression unless she turned to them for help (which
would generally be a bad idea, since social workers in our country are
generally about as nuts about these things as the ones in your country).
Her doctor, psychiatrist and/or psychologist would not be required to
tell the state anything, and her health care insurer wouldn't be sharing
that vital tidbit of information -- her diagnosis -- with the state.
So unless we get really goofy, or get a progressive Democrat as
president (but I repeat myself), this shouldn't happen.
Thanks for the BBC link.
steve
Ray Ingham - 29 Nov 2005 00:41 GMT
>> I thought it important to post this story from the BBC as it shows
>> just how abysmal our social work industry is becoming in the UK under
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> steve
Robin,
I suspect governments are moving in this direction as it saves a lot in
welfare money. I think my country is going in the same direction although I
think there are very few adoptions here and I haven't heard of anything here
like the BBC report (and hope I never will). Money is what is important
rather than peoples happiness or their support.
Ray
Robin Harritt - 29 Nov 2005 11:20 GMT
>>I thought it important to post this story from the BBC as it shows
>>just how abysmal our social work industry is becoming in the UK under
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Robin, I don't know why your're surprised. Give government this much
> power and then expect it to lay off people? Not a chance.
Steve, I'm not particularly surprised that it's happening. I am a bit
surprised to see someone that prominent in the British media reporting in a
rational way, that it is happening, and on primetime major channel BBC1.
Usually it's just the anti-adoption brigade that get a hold of this issues
like this and do more harm than good with them, by declaring that they're
evidence of some evil conspiracy involving every evil adoption worker
everywhere and politicians at all levels of every government.
When someone who might be taken seriously reports about this, then it's time
to spread the word. I wish I'd known that it was on, before it was
broadcast.
> In the evil United States, the state would never hear that a new mother
> had post-partum depression unless she turned to them for help (which
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> So unless we get really goofy, or get a progressive Democrat as
> president (but I repeat myself), this shouldn't happen.
I find myself veering back towards the anarcho-syndicalist sympathies of my
teenage years. Then, second childhood might be just around the corner.
Umm..I don't know.
Robin Harritt
http://harritt.net