TEXAS
http://www.amarillo.com/stories/072106/opi_5156302.shtml
July 21, 2006
Editorial: 'Baby Moses' law prevents crime
Local case shows reason for 'safe haven'
Until what authorities have described as a "lengthy" investigation is
complete, the details surrounding the tragic discovery of a dead infant
found in a Dumpster in Cactus won't be known.
A man and woman from Guatemala have been arrested for the crime of
misdemeanor abuse of a corpse, so their questionable immigration status
may be the least of their worries.
The only thing certain about this horrible incident is that a dead baby
was found in a trash bag in a refuse bin, tossed away like garbage.
Maybe the person who gave birth to the child could not come to grips
with the responsibility and made an unthinkable choice. Perhaps the
baby died before its body was discarded in such terrible fashion.
It is quite possible there was an alternative.
In 1999, the Texas Legislature passed the "Baby Moses Law."
This law provides a safe haven for newborns and immunity for those with
no other choice but to give up their baby.
Newborns dropped off at hospitals and fire stations become the state's
responsibility - no questions asked.
A male newborn was left on the doorstep of Amarillo's Northwest Texas
Hospital in October 2005.
Would a life have been saved in this latest case?
Right now, there's no way of knowing.
But every time we hear of a baby being thrown away in a trash bin, the
possibility such a drastic and deadly act could have been prevented
makes for a troubling question.
J. - 21 Jul 2006 21:19 GMT
> TEXAS
>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> possibility such a drastic and deadly act could have been prevented
> makes for a troubling question.
"Maybe . . . Perhaps . . . It is quite possible . . . there's no way of
knowing."
Not a ringing endorsement of SH laws, by any means.
J.
rhyzome - 22 Jul 2006 00:56 GMT
> TEXAS
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Right now, there's no way of knowing.
Of course since there's no way of knowing at this point, pimping baby
dumps is of point. One could as easily promote prenatal care, sex
education, birth control, or any number of effective means of
preventing unwanted pregnancy or perinatal fatality. But again, when
your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail...
Ron
Mike Dobony - 24 Jul 2006 22:40 GMT
> TEXAS
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> The only thing certain about this horrible incident is that a dead baby
> was found in a trash bag in a refuse bin, tossed away like garbage.
Until babies are respected at conception as human, why should this be a
surprise that children are treated as garbage to be thrown out? Until
babies are respected at conception Safe Haven laws will do little to stop
this type of disposal of non-person waste, a natural extension of pre-birth
dumping, also known as abortion. One so-called medical ethicist professor
is promoting just such executions of unwanted babies up to about 6 months
after birth! Sounds like ancient Rome when unwanted babies were placed in
the garbage dump to be eaten by wild animals and when children were given to
overnight guests as a common courtesy.
Mike D.
Marley Greiner - 25 Jul 2006 03:31 GMT
>> TEXAS
>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Mike D.
Read Sacrified for Honor by David Kertzer to see how much the Catholic
Church has honored live newborns historically. The blood of hundreds of
thousands are on its hands.
marley