Jackie, Here I am take me la la la
|
|
Thread rating:  |
joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 16 Dec 2006 07:27 GMT OK
So I have heard you are accusing me of egregious and preposterous crimes.
Here I am, tell me exactly the error of my ways, I am listening.
Just so you know, from my point of view have done a hell of a lot of listening and caring for adoptees in pain, original parents AND adoptive parents. All votes add up to say I care a f.ck of alot so please, explain your fixation.
Lilmtncbn - 16 Dec 2006 07:55 GMT On Dec 16, 12:27am, joymadse...@yahoo.com wrote:
> OK > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > adoptive parents. All votes add up to say I care a f.ck of alot so > please, explain your fixation. Jesus, who the hell are you?
pb... - 16 Dec 2006 13:18 GMT >On Dec 16, 12:27=A0am, joymadse...@yahoo.com wrote: >> OK [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >Jesus, who the hell are you? Same as the phony Celesta who posted recently.
Lilmtncbn - 16 Dec 2006 14:46 GMT > >Jesus, who the hell are you?
>Same as the phony Celesta who posted recently.- LOL! Good eye PB. I thought the post from Celesta was real!
Marley Greiner - 16 Dec 2006 15:02 GMT >> >Jesus, who the hell are you? > >>Same as the phony Celesta who posted recently.- > > LOL! Good eye PB. I thought the post from Celesta was real! I didn't come through here. What did igt say?
Marley
 Signature http://bastardette.blogspot.com http://theoconia.blogspot.com
Lilmtncbn - 16 Dec 2006 15:44 GMT On Dec 16, 8:02am, "Marley Greiner" <maddogmar...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> >> >Jesus, who the hell are you? > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Marley It's the "This place is boring" thread. But now I may be confused. LOL
> --http://bastardette.blogspot.comhttp://theoconia.blogspot.com Robibnikoff - 16 Dec 2006 11:23 GMT > OK > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > adoptive parents. All votes add up to say I care a f.ck of alot so > please, explain your fixation. Umm, what?
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo Atheist Bastard Extraordinaire #1557
Jackie - 16 Dec 2006 14:33 GMT >OK > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >adoptive parents. All votes add up to say I care a f.ck of alot so >please, explain your fixation. Dearest Joy.. welcome to alt.adoption..
I hope you stay and share your thoughts.. No moderators here Joy.. No moderators to help you spread your vicious rumors.. and spin your tales..
My cup runneth over..
Jackie
Lilmtncbn - 16 Dec 2006 15:43 GMT > >OK > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Jackie Now I'm confused. This isn't a troll?
Lilmtncbn - 16 Dec 2006 16:03 GMT >Now I'm confused. This isn't a troll? Ok, I'm answering myself and unconfused now. The OP isn't a troll, she's an adoptee who blogs. I don't agree with all her views, but she's a helluva writer and knows how to dig down to get to the nitty gritty (speaking as an adoptee). I enjoy reading her blog immensely.
I'm just wondering what the "egregious and preposterous crimes" thing is all about.
Rhiannon - 16 Dec 2006 18:12 GMT > >Now I'm confused. ?This isn't a troll? > > Ok, I'm answering myself and unconfused now. The OP isn't a troll, > she's an adoptee who blogs. >I don't agree with all her views, Nor do I. But know what? Being disagreed with doesn't rattle her.
> but she's a helluva writer and knows how to dig down to get to the nitty > gritty (speaking as an adoptee). I enjoy reading her blog immensely. I agree on both counts (helluva writer, that is. And always enjoy her blog, even when I don't agree).
> I'm just wondering what the "egregious and preposterous crimes" thing > is all about. I've always been rather fond of the word "egregious" myself.
Jackie - 17 Dec 2006 13:41 GMT >> >OK >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >> >listening and caring for adoptees in pain, original parents AND >> >adoptive parents. ll votes add up to say I care a f.ck of alot 3o
>> >please, explain your fixation.Dearest Joy.. welcome to alt.adoption.. >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >Now I'm confused. This isn't a troll? There is history here.. This for those that actually want to take the trouble to read about it.. see below.. but actually its the same old same old..
But I might as well have the issue up front in case this thread (hopefully) heats up..
It started on Soul of Adoption.. A friend of mine.. a man that is in the front lines in social work (he likes Pink Floyd as well).. dared to speak out for the profession in a thread where certain people (shall we say people that were upset) ruled the day..
The man was banned from SoA when he got upset and dared to answer back and when certain people.. IMO wanted him gone..
http://news.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?action=m&board=37138445&tid=apadoptionbirthmo thers&sid=37138445&mid=840
This is his explanation of what happened.. in two parts..
The problem I have with joy is.....
http://news.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?action=m&board=37138445&tid=apadoptionbirthmo thers&sid=37138445&mid=818
My reply to what joy posted in that link above.. was
http://news.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?action=m&board=37138445&tid=apadoptionbirthmo thers&sid=37138445&mid=845
Charlieputs is my friend Scrappy Dad.. and joymadeson is joy the women that decided it was okay to accuse my friend of sending porn over the net.. Kippaherring is Rh..
Joy later apologized... http://news.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?action=m&board=37138445&tid=apadoptionbirthmo thers&sid=37138445&mid=848 She apologized because she accused him of something that is and was impossible as he was banned from the place he was accused of doing this dastardly deed (ip address never to go through the portal of SoA again).
I ask.. what of the people that know the man and just read the accusation and not the apology.. Left the thread before it ended never to go back again..
Joy??????
Jackie
Kathy - 16 Dec 2006 16:19 GMT > OK > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > adoptive parents. All votes add up to say I care a f.ck of alot so > please, explain your fixation. Loony bat, be gone.
Kathy
joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 16 Dec 2006 19:52 GMT For those of you sadly bored enough to care, Two-Dot Jack believes me to have the power to make other people post things, holds me responsible for the actions of a grown man, after a completely vitrolic attack that I ignored on yahoo, with a big "as if" and an eye-roll, she is making her little asides, here about me,
So being the giving person, I am, I am giving her the opportunity to explain the nature of my power that frustrates her so, how exactly do I make other people post things? I might like to hone this talent of mine and use it on U.S. foreign policy.
I don't need any mod protection, never have as a matter of fact, but since you mention it, there is a matter I would like to bring up with you, THERE IS ONE PUNCTUATION MARK AT THE END OF A SENTENCE. JUST ONE. JUST THE ONE.
> > OK > > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Kathy joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 16 Dec 2006 20:03 GMT > > Loony bat, be gone. > > > > Kathy Oh and Kathy, the well constructed and relevant insult is not only more interesting but more effective.
Just trying to help.
Robibnikoff - 16 Dec 2006 23:21 GMT > For those of you sadly bored enough to care Not really
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo Atheist Bastard Extraordinaire #1557
Rhiannon - 17 Dec 2006 00:23 GMT > > For those of you sadly bored enough to care > > Not really Oh, c'mon, Robyn! Don't be coy. Show a little more enthusiasm ;-)
joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 17 Dec 2006 02:20 GMT This message was actually directed to one member of this group, Jackie, who posts about me here, claiming that I spread false rumors about an adoptive father, and other accusations that are absurd,
Where are my lies Jack? What are my rumors? Everything I have said I believe to be true and have no evidence to the contrary. So I am giving you Jackie the opportunity to confront me sans mods, and yet you fall into generalities again.
Am I the woman you are not allowed to post to? I bet I am, that is hysterical.
Show me a lie and I will apologize, the one time I believed he sent me an obsene pm, and it wasn't him, I did apologize and took full responsibilty for it. I am perfectly capable of it.
Oh and to the two, that called me a "helluva writer" Thank you ever so, Rhiannon's right, people with different view points don't rattle me, I much prefer people with their own opinions over toadies.
donnaparadise - 17 Dec 2006 04:05 GMT Well, well Joy. Fancy seeing you here! Whatchadoin? Stirring up the pot? What for? Is it boring on the 'other side" ?
I can't for the life of me figure out what would prompt you to come here with this so obvious thrust and parry in Jackie's direction. I am not defending Jackie, by any means. She is a grown up woman and can well speak for herself. However, one would almost think by your opening remark that someone has prodded you to come on here and get things stirred up.
That of which you speak is very old news and has long been discussed and beaten to death but here we are, being teased into revisiting it. I apologize up front if you find it offensive that I think this is just another grab at attention for yourself, Joy. Soooo frustrating!!!
Apologizing after one accuses someone of a misdeed in public and when they have no venue to defend themselves, just doesn't cut it, Joy. It is not enough. My personal opinion is that you ought to have checked out whether this was possible or not before you accused said individual of posting porn on your pm. I do believe you were chastized for your hasty remarks and the apology followed as there was serious risk of damage to your home forum that was greater than a spammer who got in somehow.
Some people did not see your apology. Some did. Whatever. The fact is that you jumped on the bandwagon and was only too delighted to accuse without the facts in hand and it backfired.
That, my friend, is a false rumour and you spread it. Apologizing after the fact, just doesn't erase it all.
If you think I am mad at you, you are wrong. I think that you are a good writer as others have said, however I also think you are unduly influenced by a core clique and at times, you are not too clear on where you stand. It would be nice sometimes if you really read what other posters are writing about, without thinking the whole time how you can answer and stir up the pot, if you will.
Even your Subject line on this thread seems to be geared towards getting a response and reminds me of a young child vying for attenting and not someone truly interested in learning something about themselves and others in order to become educated and find some acceptance and tranquility in their lives. But then, that is just my opinion and my take on this foolish thread and your comments.
Sometimes I just wish you would think a little more before you write. You have an excellent brain and above-average control over the use of the English language. Now if you could temper that with the thought that once you write something here, it could easily backfire and be used to remind you of your own failings in the day-to-day struggle to be just human.
I suppose what has prompted me to respond to this thread, even though you directed it at Jackie (just ignore me, if you find me offensive) is that you well know what can happen when one shoots from the lip and it can have very sad results for all concerned. As you know, I am a prime example of someone who has been hit and hurt and there is no taking things back.
In the meantime, welcome here Joy. Perhaps you will share some of your own thoughts with us so we can respond in a respectful and intelligent manner ourselves.
cheers, Donna
> This message was actually directed to one member of this group, Jackie, > who posts about me here, claiming that I spread false rumors about an [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > so, Rhiannon's right, people with different view points don't rattle > me, I much prefer people with their own opinions over toadies. joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 17 Dec 2006 04:50 GMT Think what you will of me Donna.
I think that giving Jackie the opportunity to address me directly, without worrying about being told what she can and cannot say to me is quite generous on my part.
I disagree that things were hashed out about this, if that were so, I doubt Jackie would still be posting about it.
I don't get why I am chastised for talking about it, and it is perfectly fine for her to? I am supposed to be concerned about hurting her, but not expect that type of respect in return?
Surely, anyone who saw my accusation on that thread also saw that I posted on the same thread my apology for thinking it was that person who sent me the photoshopped penis in the pm. I thought it too much of a coincidence to be discussing the posting of porn with someone and then get my only pornographic message ever, but I made a mistake and copped to it.
If she can show me a lie, or a rumor, or a mistake I made I will address it.
I most certainly have my flaws, but lying is not one of them, especially about other people, I find it a personal affront to attack my integrity that way.
Find anywhere that I am posting the like about her, I don't I wouldn't, instead of posting sideways comments alluding to her, I am addressing her directly.
For the record, my only apology to him, was in a forum that he did have a voice in, I have not apologized for the the other things I said to him, because I was outraged by his postings. Those statements, I stand by.
For gods sake, I can even remember a posting where I defended her, not out of loyalty obviously, but because I felt what the other person said, was simply not true.
As far as me being unduly influnced by a clique, I am influenced by people I respect, but I think you will notice there is not a single person I am always in agreement with, nor they me.
You know how I feel about you Donna, but on this issue, we are on opposite sides of the fence.
> Well, well Joy. Fancy seeing you here! Whatchadoin? Stirring up the > pot? What for? Is it boring on the 'other side" ? [quoted text clipped - 80 lines] > > so, Rhiannon's right, people with different view points don't rattle > > me, I much prefer people with their own opinions over toadies. rkbose@pacific.net.sg - 17 Dec 2006 07:22 GMT <snip>
> I think that giving Jackie the opportunity to address me directly, > without worrying about being told what she can and cannot say to me is > quite generous on my part. <snip>
> Surely, anyone who saw my accusation on that thread also saw that I > posted on the same thread my apology for thinking it was that person > who sent me the photoshopped penis in the pm. I thought it too much of > a coincidence to be discussing the posting of porn with someone and > then get my only pornographic message ever, but I made a mistake and > copped to it. <snip>
Well, since this is a public forum, perhaps you could fill those of us who are utterly clueless about the whole thing on what is going on? I feel as though I've walked in on the second act of a play without program notes.
I have to say that the photoshopped penis sounds intriguing, and quite appropriate to the kinds of discussions we have felt free to have in this ng.
joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 17 Dec 2006 08:47 GMT Oh lord do you really want to know? It is tedious.
Adad, who I will call Scooby here, was getting heavy handed on a fostered adults forum, fostered adult, was saying back off, not overtly, but she was, he wasn't getting it, wanted to win his argument, ok so I busted in with "unfuckingbelievable" which it was to me, I mean SHE is the fostered adult, not me, not him, she is more sensitive in a way that we don't understand, just let her have it right?
No, he responds by getting pictures from Hustler magazine that did an expose on child abuse around the time I was freakin' born, that came with a warning, in Hustler for crying out loud and posted them to a pretty PG forum. All the while claiming he is a social worker, and knows about this stuff, hey I lived with a fost-adopt social worker, and she was incredibly sensitive to this kind of stuff and would have never reacted that way, her training and education ran against behaving that way.
I called it pornography. Which Webster's backs me up on.
3 : the depiction of acts in a sensational manner so as to arouse a quick intense emotional reaction <the pornography of violence>
People got hella pissed (I am from n.ca, I can say that) about the pictures, but some people, Jackie specifically, seemed to think that I CAUSED Scooby to post these images, That I was responsible for HIS actions, after all I said 'unfuckingbelievable' when he was wanting to hammer head to head with a woman who had been bounced around in foster care.
Then Jackie went on to post passive aggressive comments on that forum, about how she dare not interact with me, or the same thing that happened to Scooby would happen to her, as if I had the power to make Jackie post offensive material, and then she attacked me on yahoo, and she continues to attack me here. Not as overtly as on yahoo. though.
Jackie's post to me, after I asked for a little more understanding between the members of the dreaded triad.
Joy wrote. "I honestly wish that we could be a little kinder and more understanding of each other."
This from someone who considers herself a bad seed.. This from someone that loves to get into the middle of every dispute and cause havoc... This from someone who I consider the source of all this arguing/abuse.. with/of Scrappy dad..
Joy wrote. "I really do, I really am a Pollyanna at heart."
I really think you should seek some therapy Joy..
Joy wrote.. "And Scrappy, pls. I know that was you who posted the porn in my pm. Honestly I don't know why you are such an angry person, but I DID NOT CAUSE YOUR ANGER, NOR CAN I HEAL IT."
You are doing it again.. aren't you Joy.. making it up as you go along.. all with the express purpose of stirring up the pot..
Bad seed.. You are living up to your opinion of yourself Joy.. get therapy..please..
Joy wrote.. "I am sure you are pissed at the way I called what you posted publicly porn. but look it up in the dictionary, it FITS. Not all porn is erotic in nature."
You sick little puppy you..
Joy wrote.. "To the rest of us, I care a lot about people in general, I care about people posting on different sides of the fence here. Can't we just breathe and relax and find compassion for each other a bit?"
You got that little halo over your head now.. don't you Joy.. Very pretty..
Joy wrote.. "It might be fun?"
Come on Joy.. I know what you consider fun..
Joy wrote.. "Insert large expensive emoticon here."
No words.. and if I do write what I am thinking I am sure I will be banned for profanity..
And joy now that I am sure to be banned from SoA.. what name are you going to make up for me?
Shall I help you? Hmmmmmm Crappy Jackie.. nooo that one is taken..
Anyone?
Jackie
*************** me again, so where is the over it part? When Two-dot is still posting stuff like this, when she is still coming here and posting crap about me, where is the over it part? Why am I held to one standard and Jackie to another? I didn't respond to her on Yahoo, I didn't take her bait many times on the sofa, but I am supposed to repeatedly be magnaminous? Haven't I been, and Jackie knows I asked her in a pm to express her feelings, to work things out with me that way, but again, she would either not respond or come back with some b.s. about how I was controlling things, and making things happen as if I am the great Oz.
I did not make that person post those horrible pictures, and just think for one moment the effort he went to, to upload each picture, It was very premeditated, and you can laugh and say oh those people who claimed there kids were upset about it were liars, but I did many things with my child on my lap, and those pictures were very upsetting to me, I didn't even see all of them just two. That was enough.
But the B.S. thing was Scooby makes a mistake, ok can relate to that, I make mistakes too, but I AM BLAMED FOR HIS ACTIONS??? WTF? Oh and you all know he was absolutely viscious to me, "what is that your word of the week Joy, etc. etc." about me using the word disingenuous, well I thought it was hella nicer saying that, than what are you pretending to be stupid or are you just stupid? And then in his stupid fake apology he calls me a liar, again tell me of the lie, I even pm'd Opus, and asked him quite honestly, tell me of the lie, I hate lies, tell me what I said was a lie, and I will retract, Opus said he couldn't find one.
Again, tell me of the lie, and I will publically apologize, just as I did before, that is all I can do, is breathe and tell the truth, I f.ck up, granted, but I own up too. So give me the reason to own up and I will, will you Jackie?
And p.s the penis was really poorly photoshopped on a very young asian boy, decidedly unsexy sorry.
Sorry for all of you that I have just bored to tears.
> <snip> > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > appropriate to the kinds of discussions we have felt free to have in > this ng. lainie.petersen@gmail.com - 17 Dec 2006 15:48 GMT > No, he responds by getting pictures from Hustler magazine that did an > expose on child abuse around the time I was freakin' born, that came [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > I called it pornography. Which Webster's backs me up on. Oh Christ. I remember seeing that when I was a kid and I thought it was kiddie porn then. I was surprised that Hustler was allowed to publish it.
L.
Kathy - 17 Dec 2006 16:43 GMT > Oh lord do you really want to know? It is tedious. > [quoted text clipped - 159 lines] > > appropriate to the kinds of discussions we have felt free to have in > > this ng. Oh Lordy, this is even too much drama for me.
Kathy
Robibnikoff - 18 Dec 2006 16:39 GMT >> Oh lord do you really want to know? It is tedious. >> [quoted text clipped - 163 lines] > > Oh Lordy, this is even too much drama for me. Yeah, I couldn't be bothered to read all that.
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
Jackie - 18 Dec 2006 21:55 GMT >Yeah, I couldn't be bothered to read all that. This is a real and difficult situation.. Wrong was done.. and I am glad that the truth has come out in a public place such as this..
Heck this is the reason I am back here.. I was sick to my stomach with what happened to scrappy dad..
I am sure there is no difficulty in the regulars going back to the other threads.. And not read this one..
Jackie
Lilmtncbn - 18 Dec 2006 22:40 GMT > I am sure there is no difficulty in the regulars going back to the > other threads.. And not read this one.. > > Jackie I think I will. This is getting too confusing for me!
Jackie - 18 Dec 2006 23:47 GMT >> I am sure there is no difficulty in the regulars going back to the >> other threads.. And not read this one.. >> >> Jackie > >I think I will. This is getting too confusing for me! This is something that has been happening for a while..
In the old days here on aa.. one could actually fight the thing through.. and everyone got to say their piece.. Not so on Soul of Adoption..
So I guess it has spilled over to here..
Jackie
Jackie - 17 Dec 2006 19:20 GMT >Think what you will of me Donna. > >I think that giving Jackie the opportunity to address me directly, >without worrying about being told what she can and cannot say to me is >quite generous on my part. Ohhhhh what a lady.... My goodness my heart sings..
>I disagree that things were hashed out about this, if that were so, I >doubt Jackie would still be posting about it. Oh Joy.. I was not posting about you.. sorry..
I was posting about how some locked up forums are dangerous.. Please show me when I was addressing my issues with you on alt.adoption.. Or ask one of your lurky friends to do it..
>I don't get why I am chastised for talking about it, and it is >perfectly fine for her to? I am supposed to be concerned about hurting [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >then get my only pornographic message ever, but I made a mistake and >copped to it. Its gets uglier..
>If she can show me a lie, or a rumor, or a mistake I made I will >address it. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >instead of posting sideways comments alluding to her, I am addressing >her directly. Ohhh poor baby..
>For the record, my only apology to him, was in a forum that he did have >a voice in, I have not apologized for the the other things I said to >him, because I was outraged by his postings. >Those statements, I stand by. Well lets hope he gets some time to address his issues with you over here.. A place that he is not banned from..
>For gods sake, I can even remember a posting where I defended her, not >out of loyalty obviously, but because I felt what the other person >said, was simply not true. Please.. do not defend me Joy..
I beg you.. Who knows what would come from it..
>As far as me being unduly influnced by a clique, I am influenced by >people I respect, but I think you will notice there is not a single >person I am always in agreement with, nor they me. No words..
>You know how I feel about you Donna, but on this issue, we are on >opposite sides of the fence. Jesus wept..
Jackie
donnaparadise - 17 Dec 2006 22:24 GMT Well Joy, I truly hesitate to respond to you since you found my last post to you to be 'insulting'. I did not write it with the intention of insulting but to give you my personal perspective and you can find it of interest or simply ignore it. Have it your way.
I wrote a long response to you and it disappeared into cyberspace. Probably a good thing as I'm not sure if it was insulting or not and it might be better to start over.
> I think that giving Jackie the opportunity to address me directly, > without worrying about being told what she can and cannot say to me is > quite generous on my part. I would agree if I believed that was truly your motivaation. However, in taking in your subject line, which appears somewhat baiting, I doubt that your heart is really feeling as generous as your words expound.
> I disagree that things were hashed out about this, if that were so, I > doubt Jackie would still be posting about it. You know, you were not the only one involved in this lynching, Joy. There were others. Many others. How do you know for absolutely sure that Jackie was speaking of you?
I know you have been angry at Scrappy ever since he got into it with Colette so long ago. Remember when you started a thread trying to talk about how poor Colette was badly treated and there were not that many takers and hardly anyone posted? There you were, trying to stir up the pot of dissension again, Joy - in my personal opinion.
> I don't get why I am chastised for talking about it, and it is > perfectly fine for her to? I am supposed to be concerned about hurting > her, but not expect that type of respect in return? Respect? Where is the respect in your opening statement? It looks more like you were throwing down the gauntlet and looking for a duel, not rational, intelligent, reasonable debate and discussion. Perhaps I am wrong. I often am.
> Surely, anyone who saw my accusation on that thread also saw that I > posted on the same thread my apology for thinking it was that person > who sent me the photoshopped penis in the pm. I thought it too much of > a coincidence to be discussing the posting of porn with someone and > then get my only pornographic message ever, but I made a mistake and > copped to it. Scrappy did not see the apology, Joy. Nor did I, for a few days as I got off the thread with disgust as to how it was going and didn't go back until I thought it had settled down. My curiosity, frankly got the best of me.
How could you equate what Scrappy sent, which was pictures of children who had been abused with someone's idea of a penis in full display. I suppose you could call the pictures of children pornographic in that it was a violent portrayal and I believe that violence especially towards children could be construed as pornographic if one wants to stretch the criteria. However, the other was sexually pornographic, not in the same context and was intended to offend and maybe in its wildest imagination to titilate. Scrappy's pictures were to inform and make a point, which was completely lost on many on the forum at that time. I imagine no one ever really did get it.
> If she can show me a lie, or a rumor, or a mistake I made I will > address it. The rumor was that it was Scrappy who posted the penis and you stated it before checking the facts or if it was even possible, since he had already been banned. The mistake was thinking that an 'oops! I'm sorry' is good enough after you slandered someone who did not deserve it, assumed it was him who did it without verifying and then playing innocent and suggesting that an apology after mispeaking really does forgive all.
Everyone makes mistakes, Joy. I've made more than my share. However, you were very eager to share you accusation and only when the owner called you on it and told you to back off, did you apologize. A little too little, too late, don't you think? Perhaps not,
> I most certainly have my flaws, but lying is not one of them, > especially about other people, I find it a personal affront to attack > my integrity that way. I don't know you to have lied. I know you to have jumped the gun and mispoken. I'm also not really sure about your story the next day that your child was on your lap when you opened the post and your child was traumatized. Not really sure why it took you so long to mention that little tidbit and it seems a bit farfetched to me. If you recall I questioned you about that at the time, however the posse came out in your defense believing every word you uttered and therefore it must be true.
> Find anywhere that I am posting the like about her, I don't I wouldn't, > instead of posting sideways comments alluding to her, I am addressing > her directly. I cannot remember Jackie mentioning your name but perhaps she did. As far as I am concerned, I just thought she was talking about the 'gang' until you showed up. You were just one of many who, in my opinion, behaved in a less than stellar manner then and who have before and continue to do so now. Too bad, I enjoyed participating on a lot of threads there. They really helped me throughout a very difficult time. However, I just can't be bothered with the drama and there is no one I feel is really interested in supporting me in my point of view there, so I don't post that often anymore.
I don't mean anyone has to agree with me. I am quite accustomed to being odd man out. I just expect to be spoken to with a civil tongue in one's mouth or with at least as much respect as I try to give out. I am not interested in standing by waiting for one of my posts to attract an "unfuckinbelievable' response from someone I am not even talking to or about.
> For the record, my only apology to him, was in a forum that he did have > a voice in, I have not apologized for the the other things I said to > him, because I was outraged by his postings. > Those statements, I stand by. He did NOT have a voice, Joy. He had already been banned and removed and could not defend his position, nor see your apology. You may have been outraged by his postings. I am not here to defend his publication of the photos. I did not agree with his response then, nor do I now and believe that behaviour was way over the top.
However, I do understand how he was goaded and pushed into some kind of action. One could see it all evolving and it looked like vultures circling a wounded animal the way he was being attacked. You may not think this was so and you have that right, However, from where I stood, I was not surprised when the whole thread blew up so badly and he was banned.
> For gods sake, I can even remember a posting where I defended her, not > out of loyalty obviously, but because I felt what the other person > said, was simply not true. Great! That was nice of you! But you just don't get it, Joy, do you? It is not about you if someone pleases you or if they agree with you or if you feel loyal towards them or not. It is just not always about you. Your propensity towards personalizing every single post and judging posters' characters and personalities and making them out to be friends or enemies, seems to me to be an exercise in futility.
The only loyalty you owe is loyalty to yourself and your personal principles, no matter what is being said or suggested. You do not owe me or anyone (even Jackie) any loyalty. But you do owe yourself the opportunity of learning everything you can about yourself and what has happened in your life that causes you to react the way you do if it is self-destructive and at least consider another point of view or way of being in the world.
You have personalized the comments made here in my opinion. I have no idea if they were specifically about you or if they were commments that were made generally about the gang, because you are not alone in the whole scenario. You stepping up tells me you think it was about you and you say you want to clear the air. But it just looks like you want to have a little drama and stir things up a bit.
> As far as me being unduly influnced by a clique, I am influenced by > people I respect, but I think you will notice there is not a single > person I am always in agreement with, nor they me. Perhaps I misspoke and you are not influenced by a clique and you really do believe some of the things you expound upon. Sorry to have made that accusation and I take it back. Do you feel better now?
> You know how I feel about you Donna, but on this issue, we are on > opposite sides of the fence. No, I have absolutely no idea how you feel about me, Joy. And that is OK. I have already told you I think you are a very well spoken young woman who writes well, tries to be a thinking person a lot of the time, but have at times tended to be someone who is a little dramatic, makes things about themselves a lot of time and is over sensitive to the extreme. I shy away from many of the threads you are on because I just don't want to get into it with you and the others.
Jackie and a few others are braver than I and keep hanging in and trying and trying and trying. Me? I'm just too old and too tired for it all.
If what I have written appears to be hurtful to you, it was not my intention. I do know however, that I would never be able to say any of this stuff to you on the other forum without a posse of supporters out to have my head cut off and I would possibly be banned in order to protect you. I don't think I have said much that is insulting or hurtful however, I do admit it is rather blunt and to the point and will try to restrain myself from now on.
Also, please tell your little friends I am not going to get into it with them when they come out to defend you, as I know they will. The game is just not that interesting.
Donna
Rhiannon - 17 Dec 2006 22:46 GMT > Scrappy did not see the apology, Joy. Joy also publicly apologised to Scrappy on the open Yahoo forum about the Donaldson report, which is where Scrappy'd gone to air his grievances. So I'm suprised that he hasn't seen it.
Marley - 18 Dec 2006 00:31 GMT > > Scrappy did not see the apology, Joy. > > Joy also publicly apologised to Scrappy on the open Yahoo forum about > the Donaldson report, which is where Scrappy'd gone to air his > grievances. So I'm suprised that he hasn't seen it. Outside of a fascinating look into the world of dysfunctional adoption survivors illustrating why nothing gets accomplished amongst them, is any of this relevant to the real world. What do virtual peni hae to do with anything?
Marley
Jackie - 17 Dec 2006 23:59 GMT >I cannot remember Jackie mentioning your name but perhaps she did. There is an advanced search on Google..
If one was to put joy in the search engine and my name as the author.. one could see that I did not mentioned Joy's nic once.. till she showed up here..
Thanks Donna for your reply to her.. she is exhausting me at the moment.. but I got my Christmas cake done.. and it turned out good..
Jackie
Rhiannon - 17 Dec 2006 15:48 GMT > Well, well Joy. Fancy seeing you here! Whatchadoin? Stirring up the > pot? What for? Is it boring on the 'other side" ? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > That of which you speak is very old news and has long been discussed > and beaten to death but here we are, being teased into revisiting it. Actually, it was Jackie who exhumed the subject on this ng: "I just know about a man that was ganged up on by a group of angry birthmom's (oh jeeez don't use that term) and miserable adoptee's.. He has been accused of sending porn on the net.. All this because he disagreed with them in a place that was moderated by miserable people.. Miserable people that make sure free speech is not the order of the day.. " I'm not *entirely* sure why she felt it necessary to bring it up here, especially after she'd already made her point on the unmoderated Yahoo site where speech is free and talk is cheap. OTOH, she's complained on SofA about how she has been attacked on this ng for standing up for her beliefs, so I guess it's any port in a storm.
> I apologize up front if you find it offensive that I think this is just > another grab at attention for yourself, Joy. Soooo frustrating!!! Apology fest!!!
> I do believe you were chastized for your > hasty remarks and the apology followed as there was serious risk of > damage to your home forum that was greater than a spammer who got in > somehow. That's what you believe. But do you *know*? I doubt it. The whole kerfuffle was so fraught with loopholes it might just as well have been a hunk of Swiss cheese.
> In the meantime, welcome here Joy. Perhaps you will share some of your > own thoughts with us so we can respond in a respectful and intelligent > manner ourselves. Good gracious, how gracious! You sound just like an old timer already. I was under the impression that you'd only just arrived here yourself. Not long after the new shiny Jackie first posted, I think it was.
donnaparadise - 17 Dec 2006 22:40 GMT > > Well, well Joy. Fancy seeing you here! Whatchadoin? Stirring up the > > pot? What for? Is it boring on the 'other side" ? [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > ng for standing up for her beliefs, so I guess it's any port in a > storm. Where does Jackie mention Joy's name? I must have missed it!!!
> > I apologize up front if you find it offensive that I think this is just > > another grab at attention for yourself, Joy. Soooo frustrating!!! [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > I doubt it. The whole kerfuffle was so fraught with loopholes it might > just as well have been a hunk of Swiss cheese. Yup! I know! I read the posts where the owner of the forum chastized her and told her to back off when there were accusations and threats going back and forth for a time and coincidentally the penis appeared. I read the owner explaining how Joy's comments could be considered slanderous and to cease and desist and to her credit, the owner told her outright that it was NOT Scrappy who had done this and to back off. I appreciated that because she could have just as easily just let it slide and have everyone on Scrappy's back for something he didn't do but she did the right thing and stated the truth - Scrappy had nothing to do with it. I remember it all very well, let me assure you.
> > In the meantime, welcome here Joy. Perhaps you will share some of your > > own thoughts with us so we can respond in a respectful and intelligent [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > I was under the impression that you'd only just arrived here yourself. > Not long after the new shiny Jackie first posted, I think it was. Hmmm! Your writing is familiar. Does your other forum name start with a K?? If it does, then you know me from other forums. I have never changed my forum name. It is and has always been me - donnaparadise. Easy to find. Easy to follow, if you will. So you know I may be new to this forum, but I have walked many miles in other forums as I am sure we have 'met' before.
If you are KH, then you are here to support Joy, I suppose. How nice. It is great to have friends. I however, am not going to get into this with you too. I will not subject myself to parry and thrust with the whole gang. I had something to say to Joy and she to me in response. I appreciate the communication and that is it. Hopefully, you too are not insulted by my comments.
DonnaParadise
Rhiannon - 18 Dec 2006 00:57 GMT > > > Well, well Joy. Fancy seeing you here! Whatchadoin? Stirring up the > > > pot? What for? Is it boring on the 'other side" ? [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > Where does Jackie mention Joy's name? I must have missed it!!! Where did I say Jackie mentioned Joy's name? I must have missed that. What I DID say was that it was Jackie who brought the subject over here. Which is an indisputable fact.
> > > I apologize up front if you find it offensive that I think this is just > > > another grab at attention for yourself, Joy. Soooo frustrating!!! [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > her and told her to back off when there were accusations and threats > going back and forth for a time and coincidentally the penis appeared. I don't remember a 'chastizing', but I may have been away at the time.
> I read the owner explaining how Joy's comments could be considered > slanderous and to cease and desist and to her credit, the owner told [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > but she did the right thing and stated the truth - Scrappy had nothing > to do with it. I remember it all very well, let me assure you. And Joy publicly apologized in a place to which Scrappy has access.
> > > In the meantime, welcome here Joy. Perhaps you will share some of your > > > own thoughts with us so we can respond in a respectful and intelligent [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > a K?? If it does, then you know me from other forums. I have never > changed my forum name. Well, good for you. I enjoy changing my name, like I enjoy changing my hair colour. I've had a number of names, and people know who I am by my written style and the facts of my life. Which is why people recognise me for who I am. I make no attempt to conceal my identity - my story and my 'style' speak for me.
> It is and has always been me - donnaparadise. > Easy to find. Easy to follow, if you will. So you know I may be new > to this forum, but I have walked many miles in other forums as I am > sure we have 'met' before. I'm confident that you and I have never exchanged a word, other than perhaps on SofA.
> If you are KH, then you are here to support Joy, I suppose. I was here long before Joy.
> How nice. It is great to have friends. I however, am not going to get into this > with you too. Who are you kidding? You already have, just by writing the above.
> I will not subject myself to parry and thrust with the > whole gang. I had something to say to Joy and she to me in response. > I appreciate the communication and that is it. Hopefully, you too are > not insulted by my comments. Be reassured that I'm not.
> DonnaParadise Dad - 18 Dec 2006 01:42 GMT > Yup! I know! I read the posts where the owner of the forum chastized > her and told her to back off when there were accusations and threats > going back and forth for a time and coincidentally the penis appeared. The penis never appears by coincidence. It's always there for a reason.
Dad
rkbose@pacific.net.sg - 18 Dec 2006 06:02 GMT > > Yup! I know! I read the posts where the owner of the forum chastized > > her and told her to back off when there were accusations and threats [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Dad Is this a good time to get into a circumcision debate?
The latest evidence seems to suggest it's a Good Thing.
Oh wait that was a different ng. Nevermind.
Rhiannon - 18 Dec 2006 15:57 GMT > > > Yup! I know! I read the posts where the owner of the forum chastized > > > her and told her to back off when there were accusations and threats [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > The latest evidence seems to suggest it's a Good Thing. Thank you, Martha Stewart.
Lilmtncbn - 18 Dec 2006 06:59 GMT > If you are KH, then you are here to support Joy, I suppose. How nice. > It is great to have friends. Uh, Rh, or KH, as you know her, has been posting here for many years. She didn't "come" here to support anyone.
Jackie - 18 Dec 2006 21:10 GMT >> If you are KH, then you are here to support Joy, I suppose. ow nice. >> It is great to have friends. > >Uh, Rh, or KH, as you know her, has been posting here for many years. >She didn't "come" here to support anyone. As Donna is new she does not know the players.. but IMO she was speaking about how Rh.. aka Kippa Herring was supporting Joy in this particular thread..
Jackie
Kathy - 19 Dec 2006 01:10 GMT > >> If you are KH, then you are here to support Joy, I suppose. ow nice. > >> It is great to have friends. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Jackie What are players? Are you saying our own Rh is a, uh, a TROLL, Jackie?
Is that what you are implying?
Kathy
Jackie - 17 Dec 2006 19:13 GMT >Well, well Joy. Fancy seeing you here! Whatchadoin? Stirring up the >pot? What for? Is it boring on the 'other side" ? > >I can't for the life of me figure out what would prompt you to come >here with this so obvious thrust and parry in Jackie's direction. She thinks I was talking about her..
> I am >not defending Jackie, by any means. She is a grown up woman and can >well speak for herself. However, one would almost think by your >opening remark that someone has prodded you to come on here and get >things stirred up. Wot the woman loves to do.. If there is an issue going down she is in the middle of it.. She wants to get into it here me thinks... so uses me to do it..
Funny old world..
>That of which you speak is very old news and has long been discussed >and beaten to death but here we are, being teased into revisiting it. >I apologize up front if you find it offensive that I think this is just >another grab at attention for yourself, Joy. Soooo frustrating!!! She's the bad seed.. don't forget that.. She sure as hell wont let you..
>Apologizing after one accuses someone of a misdeed in public and when >they have no venue to defend themselves, just doesn't cut it, Joy. I told my husband about it.. and he could not believe that someone could and or would do it..
I think Di and her palls wrote something awful about our dad.. (the one that posts here) It seems to be the thing to do..
Shut them up and make them go away..
Push the button and call for mommy to close the thread.. Push the button and tell mommy that someone said something bad about them or me..
> It >is not enough. My personal opinion is that you ought to have checked [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >damage to your home forum that was greater than a spammer who got in >somehow. And all went quiet..
>Some people did not see your apology. Some did. Whatever. The fact >is that you jumped on the bandwagon and was only too delighted to >accuse without the facts in hand and it backfired. Her stock and trade..
>That, my friend, is a false rumour and you spread it. Apologizing >after the fact, just doesn't erase it all. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >other posters are writing about, without thinking the whole time how >you can answer and stir up the pot, if you will. No mommy here tho..
>Even your Subject line on this thread seems to be geared towards >getting a response and reminds me of a young child vying for attenting >and not someone truly interested in learning something about themselves >and others in order to become educated and find some acceptance and >tranquility in their lives. But then, that is just my opinion and my >take on this foolish thread and your comments. I do not think the woman wants tranquility.. She wants spin.. she wants excitement.. she wants pathos.. she wants..
>Sometimes I just wish you would think a little more before you write. >You have an excellent brain and above-average control over the use of [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >example of someone who has been hit and hurt and there is no taking >things back. And I am so sorry that this happened to you my friend..
>In the meantime, welcome here Joy. Perhaps you will share some of your >own thoughts with us so we can respond in a respectful and intelligent [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >> >> Where are my lies Jack? Well my name is Jackie not Jack.. but spin away fair lady..
>>What are my rumors? As I am sure you have seen... I have given the link.. and I have also sent an email to scrappy dad to tell him that you are here so he can have a few words with you.. if he wants to..
>> Everything I have said I >> believe to be true and have no evidence to the contrary. What about the evidence that he could not have been in SoA when the said porn was sent..
>> So I am >> giving you Jackie the opportunity to confront me sans mods, and yet you >> fall into generalities again. Who does? Spinning again?
>> Am I the woman you are not allowed to post to? I bet I am, that is >> hysterical. No .. that is Rosalind.. as you well know..
Sorry Joy its not all about you..
>> Show me a lie and I will apologize, the one time I believed he sent me >> an obsene pm, and it wasn't him, I did apologize and took full >> responsibilty for it. I am perfectly capable of it. Ohhhh booo hoooo you are soooo golden..
>> Oh and to the two, that called me a "helluva writer" Thank you ever >> so, Rhiannon's right, people with different view points don't rattle >> me, I much prefer people with their own opinions over toadies. Ya you are a helluva writer.. Joy.. why don't you write fiction..
Jackie
Kathy - 17 Dec 2006 05:00 GMT > This message was actually directed to one member of this group, Jackie, > who posts about me here, claiming that I spread false rumors about an > adoptive father, and other accusations that are absurd, My apologies to you for my earlier comment.
Welcome.
Kathy
> Where are my lies Jack? What are my rumors? Everything I have said I > believe to be true and have no evidence to the contrary. So I am [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > so, Rhiannon's right, people with different view points don't rattle > me, I much prefer people with their own opinions over toadies. Robibnikoff - 17 Dec 2006 13:58 GMT > This message was actually directed to one member of this group, Jackie, > who posts about me here, claiming that I spread false rumors about an > adoptive father, and other accusations that are absurd, Whatever - This is an open forum and anyone can respond - Deal.
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo Atheist Bastard Extraordinaire #1557
Kathy - 19 Dec 2006 00:26 GMT > > This message was actually directed to one member of this group, Jackie, > > who posts about me here, claiming that I spread false rumors about an > > adoptive father, and other accusations that are absurd, > > Whatever - This is an open forum and anyone can respond - Deal. You ought to make a bumper sticker for tag-lines, Robyn.
You'd be on your way to what, your ?, second million? ;-P
Kathy
> -- > Robyn > Resident Witchypoo > Atheist Bastard Extraordinaire > #1557 Robibnikoff - 19 Dec 2006 14:40 GMT >> > This message was actually directed to one member of this group, Jackie, >> > who posts about me here, claiming that I spread false rumors about an [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > You'd be on your way to what, your ?, second million? ;-P LOL - If only ;)
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
Kathy - 19 Dec 2006 20:14 GMT > >> > This message was actually directed to one member of this group, Jackie, > >> > who posts about me here, claiming that I spread false rumors about an [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > LOL - If only ;) You should 'just doooo it', or them. LOL! After all, you're from jurseeey. ;-)
Kathy
> Robyn > Resident Witchypoo > #1557 > I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like > Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet Robibnikoff - 19 Dec 2006 21:03 GMT >> >> > This message was actually directed to one member of this group, >> >> > Jackie, [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > You should 'just doooo it', or them. LOL! After all, you're from > jurseeey. ;-) You betta believe it, Toots <wink> ;)
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
Kathy - 19 Dec 2006 21:15 GMT > >> >> > This message was actually directed to one member of this group, > >> >> > Jackie, [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > You betta believe it, Toots <wink> ;) LOL!
Takes one to know one! ;-p
Kathy (formerly from Chi-town)
> Robyn > Resident Witchypoo > #1557 > I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like > Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet Jackie - 17 Dec 2006 14:42 GMT >For those of you sadly bored enough to care, Two-Dot Jack believes me >to have the power to make other people post things, holds me >responsible for the actions of a grown man, after a completely vitrolic >attack that I ignored on yahoo, with a big "as if" and an eye-roll, she >is making her little asides, here about me, Ah but no mention of your attack on this man in SoA.. Heck no one can check that one can they Joy.. the place is closed to those that want to just GET THE FACTS.
>So being the giving person, I am, I am giving her the opportunity to >explain the nature of my power that frustrates her so, Accusing a man that has adopted two children of sending porn on the net speaks volumes.. to me.. but hey..
> how exactly do I >make other people post things? Well some people get frustrated with your spin..
> I might like to hone this talent of >mine and use it on U.S. foreign policy. No please.. nooooooooo!!!!!!
>I don't need any mod protection, never have as a matter of fact, but >since you mention it, there is a matter I would like to bring up with >you, THERE IS ONE PUNCTUATION MARK AT THE END OF A SENTENCE. JUST ONE. > JUST THE ONE. Issues not important.. the way someone posts is..
Right..
Jackie
Marley - 17 Dec 2006 16:05 GMT > >For those of you sadly bored enough to care, Two-Dot Jack believes me > >to have the power to make other people post things, holds me [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > Jackie This is all so girlllly-girl. In ther real world nobody cares about this crap. It's no wonder I've come to prefer to company of men.
Marley
Rhiannon - 17 Dec 2006 16:18 GMT > This is all so girlllly-girl. In ther real world nobody cares about > this crap. It's no wonder I've come to prefer to company of men. Add to that that they're not going to unexpectedly sprog on a person :-)
joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 17 Dec 2006 20:23 GMT > > This is all so girlllly-girl. In ther real world nobody cares about > > this crap. It's no wonder I've come to prefer to company of men. > > Add to that that they're not going to unexpectedly sprog on a person :-) Very true,
But two-dot, ya got nothing on me, the man posted the pornography, I do think it is possible you thought it was a lie because you didn't know the meaning of the word, in the words of Hamlet, Get Thee To A Dictionary.
But other than that, I don't apologize for a single thing I said to "our dad" gack, oh and you scurried off to tell he could find me here, neat.
Well if he does come (or one of his sock puppets, which is likely), he can know that I think he is full of rage, has poor impulse control and bad judgment, it actually frightens me that the guy is around ANY children.
And you can tell him I am absolutely NOT SORRY for calling the Hustler spread porn, and to post it without a warning (in a fostered adults forum, a most likely place for adults who had been abused as children to be) hostile, aggressive, and bizarre. I am absolutely NOT sorry for telling him he was full of crap for bashing on Collette.
Other than that I am done, I wanted to see what your basis was for spreading your insults and rumors, you have none, that is just who you are.
jwaartist@aol.com - 18 Dec 2006 14:23 GMT you know what joy, i am the adoptive dad that you are discussing on this forum. I have never met you, nor do i wish to meet you.
If you go back to your 'forum' and take an open mind, you can see that it wasnt me who started any of this.
basically folks, this is what happened, for the record.
there was an article posted:
"A teenage girl reunited with her father last year after a decade in foster care is suing Los Angeles County for taking so long to bring them together." (the article went on and on)
people were saying how awful this was for the family.
however, i chimed in and stated that i cant believe that the father didnt look for her. I felt that if the father really wanted to find his daughter in foster care, it wouldnt be that diffulcult. I felt that the father just maybe out to get some money and using the daughter as a pawn in all of this. My feeling was that maybe the father didnt want to be found.
But it was just another opinion.
i got slammed from alot of people who tell me that the system is at fault.
Then i came on and said, well, though its not a perfect system, the system has helped people.
Little did i know that i was dealing with 'forever victims'. I had no idea that everyone on that site had been abused by the system.
I have worked for 14 years in the system, and i admitted it wasnt the best (that would be why alot of SSW's burnout) but it has helped people.
I then got blasted from that site for stating the system had helped some people, yes joy, you were one of the pot stireres who started it.
this continued and continued on how i can be so insensitive to people who the system did not work for. Which for me, was that it was a public forum, not an adult fostered forum. Lets get the record straight on that one.
but people from that site kept hounding me on how cruel i was and how the system doesnt help people.
i pointed out that my children were also abused and if the system did not work for them, they would be dead, since their birthmother tried to kill them.
but to no avail, i was then blammed for even bringing up my children. When i felt that this is what it was all about. the system saved my children.
but it didnt matter.
Joy, you kept egging me on, even after i discussed my children how the system didnt work.
So let me ask you....I did not know any of the adults on that site, however i do know my children, and my heart goes more to them then some faceless person on the internet, so, who would you protect, your kids, or this faceless someone? who clearly was unstalbe, because she had left the forum quite a few times before i even talked to her.
but NOOOOOOO it was all my fault. You guys took your issues with the 'system' and turned it on me.
I went to my power point presentation at work, and downloaded pictures of abused children who were taken out of their abused homes by the 'system'
joy "he responds by getting pictures from Hustler magazine that did an expose on child abuse around the time I was freakin' born, that came with a warning, in Hustler for crying out loud and posted them to a pretty PG forum"
"and just think for one moment the effort he went to, to upload each picture, It was very premeditated, and you can laugh and say oh those people who claimed there kids were upset about it were liars, but I did many things with my child on my lap, and those pictures were very upsetting to me, I didn't even see all of them just two. That was enough."
joy, here is a lie, how dare you excuse me of getting these pictures from hustler magazine!!!! These pictures are used in psych 101 classes when discussing child abuse. now you just think for a minute, do you really think that i have a stach of old hustler magazines in my closet (when you were born as you state) and dowloaded the pictures and posted them? be serious. this is what we call pot stirrers, people who throw out crap that doesnt make sence and have people react to it.
You state these facts but they are NOT true. And since you dont lie, how did you know they were from hustler magazine, i didnt even know that. oh wait, wasnt it the owner of the site that stated it? If you think for one minute that i believe you have a copy of this hustler magazine from when you were born, then i have to question it. You just rode on the coatails of the owner.
the fact about those pictures, they were from a power point presentation on abused children (i do not know where the pictures first appeard) but i do know they are published in psych 101 books to put a face to abused children.
as for the pictures to be pornoghraphic, yes, you can use your dictionary to prove your point, but if i ask anyone, i mean anyone, when they hear the word porn, they dont think pictures of abused children. that is your issue and you will find anything you can to hurt me and assault me.
when you wrote i dowloaded pictures of kid porn. how do you think people took it. You are very very mean. you know damn well how people would of taken it.
here is another lie, "For the record, my only apology to him, was in a forum that he did have a voice in" you also know that i do not have access to soul of adoption. you posted on soul of adoption that i PM'd you porn, Your friend over there even asked you to stop stating it, and you wanted to know why.
so that is a lie also. when you said that you posted this on a site that i had access to.
joy "claiming he is a social worker, and knows about this stuff, hey I lived with a fost-adopt social worker, and she was incredibly sensitive to this kind of stuff and would have never reacted that way, her training and education ran against behaving
that way. "
im glad you lived with a fost-adopt social worker, and she was loving, but im not sure what that has to do with me. training and education?. What in the world makes you think that social workers are not human. We have feelings, we get angry.
Lets not forget where we know each other. we know each other from the computer, a nameless face. the things you have said to me, the names you have called me, chances are you would not call me that in public. So please, dont use the internet 'personality' as really getting to know someone.
joy "those people who claimed there kids were upset about it were liars, but I did many things with my child on my lap, and those pictures were very upsetting to me, I didn't even see all of them just two. That was enough. "
you just proved my point, you stopped looking at them after two. this so called 'parent' her child in her lap who claims he saw all of them. use your common sence. plus when she responded to the pictures, she never claimed anything about a child in her lap. Oh, that scenario came much later to prove a piont.
if my kid was on my lap when those pictures appeard, i would of shut the computer off and gasped for air, but not this parent, she responded not once, but twice about how she felt seeing abused children. it wasnt until much later did she bring up the kid on her lap....
use your common sence on that one joy. i cant believe that alot of you actually believed her.
I have worked in my line of work for a long time. I adopted two children from the system with alot of issues. Yes, i am hurt by what happened to them, but i am also in favor of a 'system'who removed them before other damage was done.
soul of adoption has one flavor to the site...victim victim victim..and if you dont remain a victim then you are not welcome. it doesnt take long to figure that out.
my children are true 'victims', but I will try to raise them without using their 'victim' status as excuses for bad behaviors. I realize i was blasted on that site for that, but that just further proves my point.
I am sorry that your adopted parents werent wonderful, im sorry that you probably would of loved to been raised with your bioparents, but dont hurt me or my family with your viscious 'lies' or your 'viscious' assumptions'. You dont know me, as i dont know you. and i dont appreciate that i have to keep defending myself to your viscious assumptions.
as for jackie and donna, who actually was on that site when this went down, saw what was happening and the injustice of it all. I did apologize for posting the pictures, probably was in bad taste, but there is nothing left for me to say on that subject.
but you seem to have alot to say as you continue to spread these viscious assumptions about me.
joy "I called it pornography"
It is not my fault that one thinks pictures of abused children are porno. and yes, i think its sick that you do.
Jackie - 18 Dec 2006 21:51 GMT Hello Scrappy Dad.. I am so sorry I was part of this happening over here.. I was making comments on how difficult a closed forum can be.. I was writing about how I love non moderated forums.. I was also commenting on some of the awful things that happened over there.. like when a person is having a discussion and it is stopped..
I also mentioned on how I was not allowed to post replies to certain people.. meaning Rosalind.. and Joy decided I was talking about her.. and came in here guns blazing..
>you know what joy, i am the adoptive dad that you are discussing on >this forum. I have never met you, nor do i wish to meet you. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >however, i chimed in and stated that i cant believe that the father >didnt look for her. And IMO you were dead on with your question..
> I felt that if the father really wanted to find >his daughter in foster care, it wouldnt be that diffulcult. I felt [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >But it was just another opinion. And a good one.
>i got slammed from alot of people who tell me that the system is at >fault. > >Then i came on and said, well, though its not a perfect system, the >system has helped people. Yes..
>Little did i know that i was dealing with 'forever victims'. I had no >idea that everyone on that site had been abused by the system. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >I then got blasted from that site for stating the system had helped >some people, yes joy, you were one of the pot stireres who started it. She was.. and in a private missive with her.. (one that she says she was trying to make nice with me in) I told her that she was wrong in what she did in flipping out on you.. and was responsible for what happened.. in many ways..
>this continued and continued on how i can be so insensitive to people >who the system did not work for. Which for me, was that it was a >public forum, not an adult fostered forum. Lets get the record >straight on that one. Yes..
>but people from that site kept hounding me on how cruel i was and how >the system doesnt help people. Blaming someone else seems to be part of the adoption fostering drama.. Just like your original query into the situation that started all this.. That being some dad did not check on his kid.. and blamed the system..
>i pointed out that my children were also abused and if the system did >not work for them, they would be dead, since their birthmother tried to [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >but it didnt matter. Not when they are in a feeding frenzy.. I stayed away from that thread and I wish I had of jumped in.. but at that point I was on notice that I must not cause trouble.. Red letters and all that..
Makes me sick dad..
Makes me sick that certain people on that site have carte blanche and others must not question them.. That is IMO what caused all this.. The ones that were abusing you were not stopped.. Why?
The powers that be just let it go..
Its a bad toxic site.. Soul of Adoption is its name..
>Joy, you kept egging me on, even after i discussed my children how the >system didnt work. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >or this faceless someone? who clearly was unstalbe, because she had >left the forum quite a few times before i even talked to her. She needs therapy IMO..
>but NOOOOOOO it was all my fault. You guys took your issues with the >'system' and turned it on me. And the moderators allowed and or encouraged it..
>I went to my power point presentation at work, and downloaded pictures >of abused children who were taken out of their abused homes by the [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >with a warning, in Hustler for crying out loud and posted them to a >pretty PG forum" Yes.. Joy made that up.. but then she is good at that..
>"and just think >for one moment the effort he went to, to upload each picture, It was >very premeditated, and you can laugh and say oh those people who >claimed there kids were upset about it were liars, but I did many >things with my child on my lap, and those pictures were very upsetting >to me, I didn't even see all of them just two. That was enough." I think there was more than Joy making things up in that situation.. What was written did not make sense.. Did not ring true..
>joy, here is a lie, how dare you excuse me of getting these pictures >from hustler magazine!!!! These pictures are used in psych 101 classes [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >them? be serious. this is what we call pot stirrers, people who throw >out crap that doesnt make sence and have people react to it. And the moderators protect her.. As I just wrote.. I was on warning at that time.. so I did not join in the fray.. did not challenge.
I wish I had of.. I am sorry I did not..
>You state these facts but they are NOT true. And since you dont lie, >how did you know they were from hustler magazine, i didnt even know >that. oh wait, wasnt it the owner of the site that stated it? If you >think for one minute that i believe you have a copy of this hustler >magazine from when you were born, then i have to question it. You >just rode on the coatails of the owner. She makes it up as she goes along.. Dad..
>the fact about those pictures, they were from a power point >presentation on abused children (i do not know where the pictures first [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >children. that is your issue and you will find anything you can to >hurt me and assault me. Its terrible what they are doing.. Terrible..
>when you wrote i dowloaded pictures of kid porn. how do you think >people took it. You are very very mean. you know damn well how people >would of taken it. When I told my husband about this he was incensed.. Joy has done something that is unforgivable..
>here is another lie, >"For the record, my only apology to him, was in a forum that he did [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] >never claimed anything about a child in her lap. Oh, that scenario >came much later to prove a piont. And I found it strange that that moderator that was supposedly hurt forgave you and did not protest that you were allowed back on the forum.. It does not make sense.. But then that place is a crazy making place..
The inmates are in charge of the asylum..
>if my kid was on my lap when those pictures appeard, i would of shut >the computer off and gasped for air, but not this parent, she responded [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >happened to them, but i am also in favor of a 'system'who removed them >before other damage was done. Yes..
>soul of adoption has one flavor to the site...victim victim victim..and >if you dont remain a victim then you are not welcome. it doesnt take [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >apologize for posting the pictures, probably was in bad taste, but >there is nothing left for me to say on that subject. It was and is an adult site.. And I believe that moderator was lying when she wrote that they ended up having the police late at nite because the child that saw the pictures was screaming and the neighbors complained.. I do not believe her..
>but you seem to have alot to say as you continue to spread these >viscious assumptions about me. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >It is not my fault that one thinks pictures of abused children are >porno. and yes, i think its sick that you do. Dad.. I am so sorry..
But now you have your word against hers here in a public place..
Jackie
Steve White - 18 Dec 2006 06:12 GMT > OK > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > adoptive parents. All votes add up to say I care a f.ck of alot so > please, explain your fixation. I'm sure I can find some room in my kill-file for you right next to Jackie. Ah yes, there we are ..
PLONK.
steve
The two dots were intentional.
Kathy - 18 Dec 2006 18:05 GMT Steve White wrote:
> > OK > > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > The two dots were intentional. Wot..?
Kathy
jwaartist@aol.com - 18 Dec 2006 19:23 GMT joy,
its the adad that you are talking about. you want some lies...here you go:
JOY " he responds by getting pictures from Hustler magazine that did an expose on child abuse around the time I was freakin' born, that came with a warning, in Hustler for crying out loud and posted them to a pretty PG forum. "
really? how do you know this? were you with me? I got these pictures from a powerpoint presentation on my computer, they have been on my computer for years.
You can find these pictures in and psych child abuse 101 course. they are publicly all over the place. so, there is a lie about me. how dare you post i got them from hustler when you have no idea on where i got them from.
JOY "just think for one moment the effort he went to, to upload each picture, It was very premeditated, and you can laugh and say oh those people who claimed there kids were upset about it were liars, but I did many things with my child on my lap, and those pictures were very upsetting to me, I didn't even see all of them just two. That was enough. "
well, which one was it. You saw them in the hustler magazine that you are accusing me of getting them from, or did you only see two of them posted on SOA? you cant have it both ways. we arent that stupid joy, you just keep digging your hole.
that 'parent' that we are talking about, stated her child saw all the photos, but why dont we take a walk down memory lane for a moment....shall we...lets go back a little to the facts.
1. i posted the pictures 2. the woman responds, not once, but twice about how disgusting seeing these pictures are, never mentioning her child on her lap 3. a few people commented on how disturbuing they are. 4. i deleted them, realizing they were in poor taste and i aplogized. 5. that woman comes back hours later and states that her 3 yr old child saw them and broke down crying....
6. you claim you only saw two, and that was enough, but apparently, this woman thought it was fine for her child to see all of them.
please....are you really that guiliable. This is a administrator on that site to boot, and she uses the word 'fucktard' while she claims to parent special needs kids....please.
some people over there had it in for me for a while.
now, if you are having problems with that, let go back to the beginning...
there was an article posted:
"A teenage girl reunited with her father last year after a decade in foster care is suing Los Angeles County for taking so long to bring them together." (the article went on and on)
people then commented on how horrible the system was, when i stated, "well, maybe the dad didnt want to be found. because i dont think i could of just lost my kids in the system"
then people attacked me for defending the system. I was posting on a site that was open to all parts of the triad. Not a foster-adult site. so just want to pooint that out.
then i was being attacked, i mentioned that my children, whose bmom tried to kill them, were saved by the system. but it didnt matter, now did it joy, you kept attacking me, and even started a new thread, which read like an anti-scrappy thread.
those pictures that you claim that were porn, was a way to put a face to the fact that for some children, like the ones in the pictures, were saved by the system. and then i wrote "tell them the system doesnt work"
though i did post them in anger, i quickly deleted them and apoligized. which was wrong of me.
as for this one person who got hurt before the pictures, she had some severe emothional problems before i came along, she had left that site numerous times before i even posted anything. she was offened by everything, everyone said, so dont even blame me for that.
Joy stated "And Scrappy, pls. I know that was you who posted the porn in my pm. Honestly I don't know why you are such an angry person, but I DID NOT CAUSE YOUR ANGER, NOR CAN I HEAL IT."
but you see joy, you were the one who did cause it. I am an adoptive father who simple stated the system worked for some people, i was attacked and i attacked back with the pictures.
from there i have been accused of sending child porn over the internet/ hacking into a system and sending pictures of other porn/ people have wrote they were in fear for my children/ i have been called every 4 letter word that i can think of/ I have been questioned about my profession/ ive been called a liar/ been called a troll/ threatened with law suite/ cant be trusted/ blah blah blah....and why? because the system saved me kids?...please. A little harsh for a statment about the system, dont you think? clearly not, since you are part of the problem
so, why do you think i am angry. I have spent my life trying to help people, since we adopted my two boys, i have spent the majority of time trying to get them services that they need. and you ask why i am angry? how dare any of you accuse me of such hateful things.
I realize that you were new to that site, but to hear it from people that have followed my story for years, simple turn on me, was a little too much to handle.
as for my childrens safty, we were nomianted for 'adoptive parents' of the year award, for what we have achieved with my kids, and the help we have given to other adoptive parents, from the state that i am in.
however we declined, this is not what this was about for us. To read what you people were accusing me, and to be so insensitve to my kids and my family, was just something that got me got angry.
and everytime i try to go on, there is one of you still with the hurtful things, one of the mods stated that she cant wait in 10 yrs to see whos kids turn out better!!!!!!!!!!!! WTF is that?
joy stated: "all the while claiming he is a social worker, and knows about this stuff, hey I lived with a fost-adopt social worker, and she was incredibly sensitive to this kind of stuff and would have never reacted that way, her training and education ran against behaving
that way. :"
"claiming..." this is what i mean, you continue to question me, when you dont know anything aboutt me. and here is a news flash, educated people do get angry. sorry, but they do. maybe if you hang around with more educated people, you might see them as being human.
you stated you aplogised, and only apologized because of what heartened told you on SOA. You accused me of sending porn on SOA and heartened told you to stop. you only apoligized to her for stating it, but you never apologized to me.
but the damage was already done. i saved it all on my hard drive. it is clear that you accused me of sending child porn and also porn over the internet. You can aplogize all you want, but it doesnt matter.
I am not sure what sick games you guys like to play, but it got sicker and sicker and you have used me as your 'pawn'. I will fight back.
I have stayed away from posting on forums, because one thing became clear, some people on these sites really are mentally ill. And its amazing how much damage they can cause.
and joy, im glad you read the dictionary on what porn means to allow you to say what you say.
but its sad, because you can argue that pictures of 'cancer' are porn, pictures of the human body are porn, child birth is porn....so please, spare us your defination.
you stated child porn to have the readers assume that I sent child porn in a sexual way. And to me, that is very very sick
you not only hurt me, but you hurt my children and my DW when you make accusations like that.
so, though you claim you dont lie, which i caught you in a few, you clearly are very ill. I'm not sure what kind of sick pleasure you all have over at a SOA to go out and hurt people, but im trying my best to stay away from these forums as a way to protect my family.
Kathy - 18 Dec 2006 19:38 GMT > joy, > [quoted text clipped - 173 lines] > have over at a SOA to go out and hurt people, but im trying my best to > stay away from these forums as a way to protect my family. This is beginning to sound a lot like Christmas. ;-O
Kathy
Rhiannon - 18 Dec 2006 20:03 GMT > > joy, > > [quoted text clipped - 175 lines] > > This is beginning to sound a lot like Christmas. ;-O Jingle bells ding dong?
jwaartist@aol.com - 18 Dec 2006 20:23 GMT i was thinking the same thing....its christmas. Why cant she just leave me, and my family alone. I dont belong to that sick site anymore, but she has to keep bringing up the abused chidlren as pornographic.
its sick, and i am at the end of her twisted mind. I really just wish you would go away and leave us alone.
Robibnikoff - 18 Dec 2006 21:28 GMT > i was thinking the same thing....its christmas. Why cant she just > leave me, and my family alone. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > its sick, and i am at the end of her twisted mind. I really just wish > you would go away and leave us alone. Is someone forcing your to read stuff from her?
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
Lilmtncbn - 18 Dec 2006 22:04 GMT > > its sick, and i am at the end of her twisted mind. I really just wish > > you would go away and leave us alone.
>Is someone forcing your to read stuff from her? > -- > Robyn I was wondering the very same thing!!
jwaartist@aol.com - 18 Dec 2006 22:04 GMT this woman and the site she belongs to has accused me of all sorts of things that arent true. though she claims they are. I never met this woman, i dont even know where she lives. But yet she continues to say hateful things about me.
and the answer to your question, yes, i am being forced to read this garbage, my lawyer told me to keep a record of the accusations that are written. There are some sights that i am not allowed to access, so i cant get everything, but i am being suied by these nut nuts and i would love to just chalk it up and ignore it, but they are crazy and i cant put anything past them. My lawyer instructed me to just keep saving this crap.
My job, my family, my children are at risk for the allegations that this crazy woman keeps accusing me of doing. It wouldnt be so bad if they just kept it to their site, but they have carried it around with them to other parts of the internet. and now they are here. most of the stuff i have read, i really dont reply to, but she was giving two people sh.t that i respect a hard time also.
so sorry if my anger towards her is spilling over here, but i can lose my kids by the mere allegations that this woman has been accusing me of.
I wish it would all just go away, but as you can see, i havnt posted until the third page, but she keeps on insisting that i dowloaded child porn and that i got from some hustler magazine.
i personally of rather been this hacker who PM'd her a dirty pictures then a distributor of child porn. figures she cops to the lesser of the evils....
so, to answer your question, yes, i do have to read, ive been reading this sh.t for a while now, and it does get tiring to keep reading how i download child porn and how much rage i have in me that my chidlren might not be safe....but yet, she still continues to make more things up as she goes along..
why just today, i found out that i downoaded these pictures from hustler magazine, thats actually new, i dont remember reading that before....if i did, i dont remember from all the other garbage thrashed about.
Her friend is suing me, still not sure on what, so yes, i have to read and save all this sh.t per my lawyer. its not a fun time, and i can think of many othe things i could be doing than reading this sh.t....but my kids are at risk for being taken away because one of them is not legalized yet. so yea, i have to read and its hard for me to sit back and let the accusations fly.
its funny, all i said was that the system had worked for my kids and others, and found myself in this web of hate.....
sorry my posts are bothering you, but think of it this way, be grateful you are not on the reciveving end of these people, they have frightened my family after reading what they have written about me.
but i have a feeling it will end soon.
> > i was thinking the same thing....its christmas. Why cant she just > > leave me, and my family alone. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like > Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet Kathy - 18 Dec 2006 22:38 GMT > this woman and the site she belongs to has accused me of all sorts of > things that arent true. Who gives a candy cane? You ought to go read some of the posts over on the AOL adoption and fostering forum. Well, what's left of it.
Kathy
though she claims they are. I never met this
> woman, i dont even know where she lives. But yet she continues to say > hateful things about me. So use your filters, and if that doesn't work, play right along with them.
One way or another, you're still responsible for your choices.
Kathy
> and the answer to your question, yes, i am being forced to read this > garbage, my lawyer told me to keep a record of the accusations that are [quoted text clipped - 65 lines] > > I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like > > Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet Jackie - 18 Dec 2006 22:51 GMT >sorry my posts are bothering you, but think of it this way, be grateful >you are not on the reciveving end of these people, they have frightened >my family after reading what they have written about me. As I just wrote.. the regulars do not have to read this thread.. What has been a tradition on aa for years..
I did not invite Joy over here.. I do not know what I wrote that encouraged her to come over here and start this thread.. I never used her name before she started this thread..
Its like I can not even write about Soul of Adoption and how toxic that site is..
If I do this happens..
Jackie
Robibnikoff - 19 Dec 2006 14:34 GMT > this woman and the site she belongs to has accused me of all sorts of > things that arent true. though she claims they are. I never met this [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > put anything past them. My lawyer instructed me to just keep saving > this crap. Ooooooooookay.
Too much eggnog?
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
kat - 19 Dec 2006 16:15 GMT > > this woman and the site she belongs to has accused me of all sorts of > > things that arent true. though she claims they are. I never met this [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Too much eggnog? Sounds fishy to me.
Kathy 1
joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 19 Dec 2006 16:41 GMT You know Scrappy/charlie Peanuts et al, you really do not talk like a social worker, and I thought you flipped flopped from doing work with inmates,to foster care to working with pregnant "gum smacking" teens, in newborn placement.
The social workers I have known don't flip so radically and quite frankly talk a lot about licensing, and supporting people in crisis not deriding them.
I wonder how you are quoting from a site you are banned from Scrappy? The pictures you downloaded in the worst judgment possible had Hustler credits attached to them, how do you think I knew they were from Hustler? Let's not forget you posted them in the fostered adult forum.
Your Power point stuff, really, so now you are placing newborns, training people on child abuse, working with inmates, and abused children, sounds far fetched, oh and because you are a social worker have a cache of lawyers at your disposal, umm yeah whatever.
Jackie, I am well aware of the pissy missive where you told me I was responsible for what Scrappy/dad/Charlie et al, had done, that was one of the most absurd, most divorced from logic and the oppression of syntax that I have ever seen.
That's what baffles me, that you are willing to give me that kind of power. I am now responsible for the actions of someone who supposedly has an advanced degree in social work, because you would have to have at least a masters to do the kind of work he is alluding to.
BUT again about the mods coddling me, Jackie the first time I ran afoul of them, was when they were protecting you from me, because I found you posting in an adoptee how you wouldn't help at least attempt to help your son find out who is father is perverted to say the least, your response, "But I know Marley and some other people, " I didn't know who Marley was at the time but I find it even more bizarre that you would claim her in friendship, someone who fights for open records, while justifying why you won't help your own son..
Because you are at peace..
Your kind of peace the world is better of without.
And aren't you always preaching responsibility?
But I am responsible for whatever the hell he likes to call himself's behavior?
Laaaaame.
> > > this woman and the site she belongs to has accused me of all sorts of > > > things that arent true. though she claims they are. I never met this [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Kathy 1 Jackie - 20 Dec 2006 00:16 GMT >You know Scrappy/charlie Peanuts et al, you really do not talk like a >social worker, and I thought you flipped flopped from doing work with [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >frankly talk a lot about licensing, and supporting people in crisis not >deriding them. All he did Joy was to interject a bit of sanity in the pity party that was that thread.. And he objected to the trashing of social workers..
But Ya.. reality not allowed on SoA.
>I wonder how you are quoting from a site you are banned from Scrappy? >The pictures you downloaded in the worst judgment possible had Hustler >credits attached to them, how do you think I knew they were from >Hustler? Let's not forget you posted them in the fostered adult forum. And the thread was about fostered ADULTS Joy..
No one told folks that it was a pity party forum.. But folks sure learned..
>Your Power point stuff, really, so now you are placing newborns, >training people on child abuse, working with inmates, and abused [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Jackie, I am well aware of the pissy missive where you told me I was >responsible for what Scrappy/dad/Charlie et al, My words were not pissy Joy I told you to get the hell out of my PM box.
I told you that I had no respect for you..
> had done, that was one >of the most absurd, most divorced from logic and the oppression of >syntax that I have ever seen. Ohhhh you spin and spin again..
You really should write a fiction book.. You have a very good imagination..
>That's what baffles me, that you are willing to give me that kind of >power. All I did lady was to tell you what I thought of you.. plain and simple.
> I am now responsible for the actions of someone who supposedly >has an advanced degree in social work, because you would have to have >at least a masters to do the kind of work he is alluding to. No... you wrote on Yahoo that a good friend of mine sent you porn.
That is the bottom line here.. And I say shame on you Joy.
>BUT again about the mods coddling me, I remember when the head moderator said at the end of a thread (where someone was trying to speak out and make a point) that she had held her moderators back.. Told them then could not argue the point.. I had an image of them clamping at the bit..
Why do you think that train wreck happened on that foster adult thread? The mods let all the berating of dad go on and on... And myself and a few others were threatened that if we argued with one more person we would be out of there..
Just like with Rosalind.. she was told to not come near me and a few others and she just forgot about it and went right in with her stupid comments.. and the ones she was being nasty to could not do or say a thing..
>Jackie the first time I ran afoul >of them, was when they were protecting you from me, because I found you [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >would claim her in friendship, someone who fights for open records, >while justifying why you won't help your own son.. That is not what happened Joy.. and you know it..
You are mixing threads up.. and I needed no protection from you.. None what so ever..
>Because you are at peace.. You really are a piece of work..
>Your kind of peace the world is better of without. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Laaaaame. No words..
Jackie
>> > > this woman and the site she belongs to has accused me of all sorts of >> > > things that arent true. though she claims they are. I never met this [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >> >> Kathy 1 joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 20 Dec 2006 00:52 GMT Jeez, it's like there is a little mouse running through all the holes in your logic, bizarre.
You write a bunch of words and dots and then say "no words."
Yes, exactly the first time I got my hand slapped was saying you shouldn't be on an adoptee support thread talking about how you woulnd't help your son get his records, even though he very much wanted them.
"He can call the agency himself.."
Where is the personal responsiblity in that? You know damn well he will get f.ck all from the agency, and then in the next breath claim you are an adoption reform champion. GACK
And then there was that great and grand time you said you were leaving to never come back to go to adopto.com where your real friends were and the deafening sound of no one caring, and yet you still came back.
There is no spin in writing that your pissy missive, that you solicited me with was divorced from logic, and any command of the English language, that was true..
But you don't even notice how you double back, how you point a finger at everyone else for doing the same exact thing you do, while you are doing it, that your constant conflabulation is often viscious and attacking, and then you post about how you are abused, after you have spent so much time abusing.
I honestly believe you can't see it though.
> >You know Scrappy/charlie Peanuts et al, you really do not talk like a > >social worker, and I thought you flipped flopped from doing work with [quoted text clipped - 126 lines] > >> > >> Kathy 1 joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 20 Dec 2006 01:16 GMT Scrappy
I received your email, but don't want to email you from my email that freaks me out. So listen, about your plea for me never to associate any screen name of yours with pornography again,
It is a deal, as long as you don't post crap like that again, that was in really poor judgment esp. given the ages and conditions of those children who are all adults now, to use their images like that to win an argument, was obsene in my book. What if one of them, very likely adopted or fostered happened upon their own image in a "support" group, gross, just gross.
I wouldn't have brought it up again at all except your dear friend Jackie was posting about it over here. You can thank her for keeping the subj. alive, I would just as soon be done with it. My beef was with her, about what she was posting here.
I hardly reported anything to anyone in any official capacity and have no interest in doing that, it was a gross out on a forum, I can deal.
If Jackie keeps up her need to post about it, I may answer her again, but I will keep your name out of it.
I have turned the other cheek with Jackie a lot, but then I just got tired, of her stupid "Joy needs the mods" "Joy made xxx do this" "joy blah blah blah"
So I gave her the opportunity to confront me head on, here, no mod coddling as she accuses me of, none of the sideswipes that she is so fond of, and it's usual typical, nonsenical, convulted, contratictory, and ultimatley completely with out substance typical Jack.
But yeah, she was using the ugly incident with you to keep poking at me.
So there, agreed, I will stay away from you, and ask the same of you.
joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 20 Dec 2006 01:33 GMT Just to clarify when I posted, I hardly, I should have said, it never crossed my mind to report you to anyone about anything.
> Scrappy > [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > So there, agreed, I will stay away from you, and ask the same of you. joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 20 Dec 2006 02:51 GMT Oh barf, I just heard that you posted about this even somewhere else, Scrappy, you claim you want to stop it and now are spreading it around yourself, sheesh.
Unfuckingbelievable,
Always comes full circle with you.
> Just to clarify when I posted, I hardly, I should have said, it never > crossed my mind to report you to anyone about anything. [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > > > So there, agreed, I will stay away from you, and ask the same of you. Robibnikoff - 20 Dec 2006 14:11 GMT > Oh barf, I just heard that you posted about this even somewhere else, > Scrappy, you claim you want to stop it and now are spreading it around [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Always comes full circle with you. Why are you posting this nonsense here?
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
Kathy - 20 Dec 2006 17:31 GMT > > Oh barf, I just heard that you posted about this even somewhere else, > > Scrappy, you claim you want to stop it and now are spreading it around [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Why are you posting this nonsense here? I would say Joy to the world is letting Jack Frost nip at her nose.
Kathy
> -- > Robyn > Resident Witchypoo > #1557 > I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like > Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet Robibnikoff - 20 Dec 2006 17:44 GMT >> > Oh barf, I just heard that you posted about this even somewhere else, >> > Scrappy, you claim you want to stop it and now are spreading it around [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > I would say Joy to the world is letting Jack Frost nip at her nose. Maybe she wasn't allowed to join in any reindeer games.
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
KL - 23 Dec 2006 11:26 GMT >>> Oh barf, I just heard that you posted about this even somewhere else, >>> Scrappy, you claim you want to stop it and now are spreading it around [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > I would say Joy to the world is letting Jack Frost nip at her nose. Jack Frost, or Jack Daniels??
--
KL
donnaparadise - 24 Dec 2006 00:44 GMT Joy, what the heck is going on? What is the matter with you? Can you not see how ridiculous this rage attack is?
All this happened so long ago and it had all quietened down, thankfully. However, somehow you think for some reason that Jackie and others have nothing better to do with their time than to centre you out, pick on you, tell lies about you and you are so determined to be right in all of this, that you just won't let up!
It would not be the first time that you have been called on the fact that you often mis-interpret things and have erred in judgement yourself. Mostly, as I see it, because you personalize every single darn post you read - as if it was directed or targeted right to you and about you. It is not always about you, Joy. I wish you would see that.
I have not been personally the target for some of your missives because I mostly stay clear of you. I have seen how you have targeted others and how you have disseminated posts to the point that they had to be closed because you just plain 'got it wrong'.
I'm not going to go over in detail what you said/she said/he said. It just doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things. If you are so determined to see this to the bitter end in order to be right, then so be it. There are enough of us here to really recall what went on and your need to win is apparent to me, at least. OK. You win! I agree with everything you say - forever.
You are right, Joy. You are always right, Joy. You will always be right, Joy. Everything you say, think, do, is perfectly fine. You never make errors in judgement, interpretation, thought process, or action. We are all wrong. We know nothing. Our experience is nothing compared to yours. Only you know the truth about adoption and how absolutely terrible it is. Only you have suffered. Only you have it all together.
There. Do you feel better?
I wish you would just take a breath, read over the threads that got locked because of the viciousness on them and really read every single word that was written. However, when you do, insert someone else's name where yours is. Maybe Santa Claus? Then, see if there was not some teensy, weensy, little, bitty, remark that you Might have made that Might have gotten things a itsy bit off the rails.
If you cannot, then fine. However, this is your opportunity to be the bigger man and just let this damn thing go!
Have a good holiday everyone!
DonnaParadise
joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 24 Dec 2006 05:13 GMT > Joy, what the heck is going on? What is the matter with you? Can you > not see how ridiculous this rage attack is? [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] > > DonnaParadise Dear DP:
I am glad you bring up these important points and since you have decided to defend you dear friend Jack, I have likewise enlisted my dear friend Cara, to defend me. She is not a member of the dreaded triad but .. She quite enjoyed your thoughtful response..
My guest respondee:
What the heck is going on? You ask. Hmm. It appears that your 'bird of paradise feathers' feathers are rather ruffled and your ability to compose your projecting nature has been compromised. Maybe it is simply insecurity, that is ok, we all have it. I advise that you read your last entry to Joy and realize to whom you really are referring to.
Care for an example?
You write to Joy "you just won't let up" following that statement are 6 paragraphs repeating
viscious attacks on my sainted friend.
More later, I have a Christmas to attend to .
Cara.
joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 24 Dec 2006 18:05 GMT Dear Miss DB-
this is Rev Jasper Grump, Joy's religious and philosophical consultant.
I must first make it known that I believe that due to your abuse of the English language,that you must surely abuse other things including drugs--most specifically crack. Furthermore, I think that you suffer from delusions, and most likely were never involved with an adoption, this hs all been concocted in your twisted addled mind, but alas I must go now, I shall continue haranguing later.
> > Joy, what the heck is going on? What is the matter with you? Can you > > not see how ridiculous this rage attack is? [quoted text clipped - 73 lines] > > Cara. Jackie - 21 Dec 2006 12:44 GMT >I have turned the other cheek with Jackie a lot, but then I just got >tired, of her stupid "Joy needs the mods" "Joy made xxx do this" "joy >blah blah blah" You are making things up again Joy..
Jackie
kat - 21 Dec 2006 00:06 GMT > And then there was that great and grand time you said you were leaving > to never come back to go to adopto.com where your real friends were and > the deafening sound of no one caring, and yet you still came back.
> But you don't even notice how you double back, how you point a finger > at everyone else for doing the same exact thing you do, while you are > doing it, that your constant conflabulation is often viscious and > attacking, and then you post about how you are abused, after you have > spent so much time abusing. I can't help but noticing it is the same behavior but with different players.
> I honestly believe you can't see it though. That's debateable.
Kathy 1
Kathy - 18 Dec 2006 22:35 GMT > > i was thinking the same thing....its christmas. Why cant she just > > leave me, and my family alone. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Is someone forcing your to read stuff from her? Where do you want your check sent?
Kathy (in charge of handing out the presents this year)
> Robyn > Resident Witchypoo > #1557 > I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like > Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet Robibnikoff - 19 Dec 2006 14:34 GMT >> > i was thinking the same thing....its christmas. Why cant she just >> > leave me, and my family alone. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Kathy > (in charge of handing out the presents this year) LOL! New Joisey! :)
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
Jackie - 18 Dec 2006 22:01 GMT >i was thinking the same thing....its christmas. Why cant she just >leave me, and my family alone. >I dont belong to that sick site anymore, but she has to keep bringing >up the abused chidlren as pornographic. Dad.. Rh is Kippa Herring.. She says she is an open book but I do not think so.. I used to read her posts over there and wonder whether she was Rh.. But I did not know for sure until I asked her point blank over here..
>its sick, and i am at the end of her twisted mind. I really just wish >you would go away and leave us alone. She's the bad penny.. She loves that role..
Jackie
Kathy - 18 Dec 2006 23:10 GMT > >i was thinking the same thing....its christmas. Why cant she just > >leave me, and my family alone. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Jackie Oh my.
Kathy (beginning to see why God made Killfiles)
Lilmtncbn - 18 Dec 2006 22:03 GMT On Dec 18, 1:23pm, jwaart...@aol.com wrote:
> i was thinking the same thing....its christmas. Why cant she just > leave me, and my family alone. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > its sick, and i am at the end of her twisted mind. I really just wish > you would go away and leave us alone. That's weird. I don't think she followed you here.
Kathy - 18 Dec 2006 23:07 GMT > On Dec 18, 1:23?pm, jwaart...@aol.com wrote: > > i was thinking the same thing....its christmas. ?Why cant she just [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > That's weird. I don't think she followed you here. I think I finally figured it out. Isn't it Christmas break for the grade school kiddies?
Kathy
Robibnikoff - 19 Dec 2006 14:34 GMT >> On Dec 18, 1:23?pm, jwaart...@aol.com wrote: >> > i was thinking the same thing....its christmas. ?Why cant she just [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > I think I finally figured it out. Isn't it Christmas break for the > grade school kiddies? No, that's next week ;)
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
Jackie - 18 Dec 2006 21:58 GMT Kathy wrote..
>> This is beginning to sound a lot like Christmas. ;-O > >Jingle bells ding dong? Real funny eh..
Kippa.. eat dead socks and go and tell your sick buddies about it..
Jackie
jwaartist@aol.com - 18 Dec 2006 22:41 GMT jackie, thats kippa?
wow, why are so mean kippa? what sick pleasure do you get out of hurting people? you and joy and some others
i cannot wrap my mind out of what sick pleasure you guys get on hurting others, especially when there are children involved in this 'law suit'
i wish i could understand the pleasure you guys get out of this.
> Kathy wrote.. > >> This is beginning to sound a lot like Christmas. ;-O [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Jackie Jackie - 18 Dec 2006 23:44 GMT >jackie, >thats kippa? [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >i wish i could understand the pleasure you guys get out of this. She is fairly different here.. That was why I could not connect her to the woman on SoA.. The business of her living in Ontario and the fact that she had relinquished and adopted a child was what kept me thinking of Rh over here..
I met her on Origins.. Di Welfares site years ago..
But I guess when you change your nic's.. you change your personality.. or.. the regulars here would not allow her to get away with her love of the ones that do victim speak..
Jackie
Kathy - 19 Dec 2006 00:44 GMT > >jackie, > >thats kippa? [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Jackie Joy to the world, the carolers have pooped on themselves.
Kathy (who knew it wouldn't take long)
Robibnikoff - 19 Dec 2006 14:34 GMT >> >jackie, >> >thats kippa? [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Joy to the world, the carolers have pooped on themselves. SNORT! You owe me a keyboard! :)
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
Kathy - 19 Dec 2006 18:26 GMT > >> >jackie, > >> >thats kippa? [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > SNORT! You owe me a keyboard! :) I'll make sure I add alittle something extra in your stocking this year. :-)
::::::Ho, Ho, Ho:::::: Kathy
> Robyn > Resident Witchypoo > #1557 > I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like > Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet Lilmtncbn - 20 Dec 2006 11:49 GMT > > SNORT! You owe me a keyboard! :)
>I'll make sure I add alittle something extra in your stocking this > year. :-) > > ::::::Ho, Ho, Ho:::::: > > Kathy If you were an adoptee, I'd be very very scared.
Kathy - 20 Dec 2006 17:33 GMT > > > SNORT! ?You owe me a keyboard! :) > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > If you were an adoptee, I'd be very very scared. What? You don't like my Wassailing?
Kathy
Robibnikoff - 20 Dec 2006 17:44 GMT >> > > SNORT! ?You owe me a keyboard! :) >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > What? You don't like my Wassailing? Is that anything like Whupass?
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
Rhiannon - 20 Dec 2006 18:12 GMT > >> > > SNORT! ?You owe me a keyboard! :) > >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Is that anything like Whupass? No. That's for Whupassover.
Kathy - 20 Dec 2006 22:25 GMT > > >> > > SNORT! ?You owe me a keyboard! :) > > >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > No. That's for Whupassover. LOL!
Kathy
Kathy - 20 Dec 2006 22:23 GMT > >> > > SNORT! ?You owe me a keyboard! :) > >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Is that anything like Whupass? Don't confuse me.
I'm still trying to figure out the name of this thread. 'Jackie, Here I am take me la la la'. ;-)
Kathy
> Robyn > Resident Witchypoo > #1557 > I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like > Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 21 Dec 2006 06:50 GMT Trust me the it's really not that interesting the source of the title,
Just a reference to Jackie's repeated asides that I am mod-coddled and couldn't handle myself without my mod-mommies.
That's why all you alt.ers were subjected to some in-fighting from another site, that's why I put her name in the title, to not confuse the rest of you that this might actually be a topic of interest to you. I am not complaining about your participation, just apologizing for the tedium of other people's beefs.
I see them too on the net, and well, if you are not part of it, they can be quite tiresome.
Had a pop song in my head at the time I posted it,
agghh,
my girlishness is boring even myself, gah.
> > >> > > SNORT! ?You owe me a keyboard! :) > > >> [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like > > Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet Lilmtncbn - 21 Dec 2006 07:33 GMT > Trust me the it's really not that interesting the source of the title, > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > my girlishness is boring even myself, gah. No worries, Joy! I hope that now you've taken a step into the "dark side" you've found that alt.a isn't as evil or scary a place as touted by some in the comment section of Bastardette's blog.
Spanky Peanuts or whatever the heck his name is thought we were insulting him with "Ding Dong". LOL Too bad he wasn't onhand for a good old-fashioned "f*ckfest"!
Anyway, hopefully you'll stick around to discuss other stuff. Although I'm not anti-adoption (adoptee---good adoption---good reunion), I do enjoy your blog tremendously.
Jackie - 21 Dec 2006 14:15 GMT >> >> > > SNORT! ?You owe me a keyboard! :) >> >> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >I'm still trying to figure out the name of this thread. 'Jackie, Here I >am take me la la la'. ;-) She thinks a lot of herself?
She thinks I was writing about her when I was commenting on how dangerous some closed forums can be?
She is a liar?
Jackie
Kathy - 21 Dec 2006 18:01 GMT > >> >> > > SNORT! ?You owe me a keyboard! :) > >> >> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > She is a liar? Either you think Joy is a liar or you don't. Why ask me, Jackie?
I don't even know her.
Kathy
Jackie - 22 Dec 2006 00:27 GMT >> >> >> > > SNORT! ?You owe me a keyboard! :) >> >> >> [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > >Kathy It was a rhetorical question?
Jackie
Robibnikoff - 21 Dec 2006 14:15 GMT >> >> > > SNORT! ?You owe me a keyboard! :) >> >> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > I'm still trying to figure out the name of this thread. 'Jackie, Here I > am take me la la la'. ;-) Hmmm.....sounds suggestive to me! :)
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
Lilmtncbn - 21 Dec 2006 00:33 GMT > > > > SNORT! ?You owe me a keyboard! :) > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > > If you were an adoptee, I'd be very very scared.
>What? You don't like my Wassailing? > > Kathy I'd be afraid that any little brown things you put in my stocking wouldn't be chocolate. ;-)
Rhiannon - 19 Dec 2006 15:25 GMT > >jackie, > >thats kippa? > > > >wow, why are so mean kippa? Ding dong? That was mean? By alt.a standards, that was a warm and fuzzy hug.
> She is fairly different here.. That was why I could not connect her to > the woman on SoA.. The business of her living in Ontario and the fact > that she had relinquished and adopted a child was what kept me > thinking of Rh over here. That's cute, but it doesn't wash. We had an exchange this summer in which you made it pretty damn clear you knew who I was. Besides, how could you not? The facts were all out there. Ex-U.K, living in Ontario, son relinquished in early '60's, reunited, adopted son, younger born-to son, lived in Cairo, maternity home, etc, etc, blah. I could go on. C'mon. Nobody's that stupid.
> I met her on Origins.. Di Welfares site years ago.. That's right. Where I landed immediately post reunion. Fortunately, I was directed from there to here.
> But I guess when you change your nic's.. you change your personality..
Change of personality? Look who's talking.
> or.. the regulars here would not allow her to get away with her love > of the ones that do victim speak.. Oh, oh, you regulars. Falling down on yourselves . . . You really should pull yourselves together.
Jackie, I'm personally neither into "healing" or wallowing. But when I see people who are newly going through difficult times and who are still actively in distress being reproached for not being "at peace with their decisions"(among other platitudes), I get pissed. And remarks such as "underage people who should not be having sex" don't rate high with me either.
Now, as far as my "support" of Joy is concerned - I've simply drawn attention to the fact that this steaming pile of sh.t was brought to this ng by none other than yourself. I have also tried to correct misinformation that implied that the "offended" party was unable to read Joy's formal apology, and that he had no other venue where he could express himself.
Dead socks? Sorry, no. I eat them live, like oysters, with a squeeze of lemon, and washed down with a pint of Guinness
> Jackie Jackie - 19 Dec 2006 23:58 GMT >> >jackie, >> >thats kippa? [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >That's cute, but it doesn't wash. We had an exchange this summer in >which you made it pretty damn clear you knew who I was. Prove it.. I still have access to SoA give me the link Kippa. Show me where we actually discussed anything over there.. You made me sick over there and I wanted nothing to do with you..
In private I told you that if you ever sent me a nasty PM like you sent me I would make it public..
I did not know who you were..
>Besides, how >could you not? You are very different here..
>The facts were all out there. Ex-U.K, living in Ontario, >son relinquished in early '60's, reunited, adopted son, younger born-to >son, lived in Cairo, maternity home, etc, etc, blah. I could go on. >C'mon. Nobody's that stupid. I stopped reading your posts over there.. Kippa..
>> I met her on Origins.. Di Welfares site years ago.. > >That's right. Where I landed immediately post reunion. >Fortunately, I was directed from there to here. Yes.. and I remember how funny you thought I was when I was sharing some things that had upset me directly after my bsons birth.
> > But I guess when you change your nic's.. you change your >personality.. > >Change of personality? Look who's talking. Ah but I change and change again.. and I am an open book..
>> or.. the regulars here would not allow her to get away with her love >> of the ones that do victim speak.. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Jackie, I'm personally neither into "healing" or wallowing. Oh please..
>But when I >see people who are newly going through difficult times and who are >still actively in distress being reproached for not being "at peace >with their decisions"(among other platitudes), I get pissed. And >remarks such as "underage people who should not be having sex" don't >rate high with me either. Unprotected sex..
>Now, as far as my "support" of Joy is concerned - I've simply drawn >attention to the fact that this steaming pile of sh.t was brought to >this ng by none other than yourself. So discussing (making people aware) that a closed forum that is run by folks that support the victim speak and tell the ones that challenge the said victim speak to shut the hell up or leave.. is bringing a pile of shite here?
Right..
No one can say diddly squat about that place can they.. Poooor poooor victims..
>I have also tried to correct >misinformation that implied that the "offended" party was unable to >read Joy's formal apology, and that he had no other venue where he >could express himself. Ummmm what about the ones that read what joy wrote and did not go back to Yahoo?
>Dead socks? Sorry, no. I eat them live, like oysters, with a squeeze of >lemon, and washed down with a pint of Guinness Enjoy.
Jackie
Rhiannon - 20 Dec 2006 03:47 GMT > >> >jackie, > >> >thats kippa? [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Prove it.. I still have access to SoA give me the link Kippa. Can't give you a link because I can't remember the exact thread or wording . But I expressed irritation with your newly reformed image as uber-guru - and you responded in a way that seemed to indicate you understood who I was.
> Show me where we actually discussed anything over there.. > You made me sick over there and I wanted nothing to do with you. Jackie, are you really that obtuse? Don't you *see* that some of the stuff you put out is as offensive to others as some of what they write may be to you?
> In private I told you that if you ever sent me a nasty PM like you > sent me I would make it public.. > > I did not know who you were.. Get away with you ! You've got to be kidding! In fact, that PM was never meant to be sent to you. And I seriously apologise that it was. I am sure it upset you and I'm glad you've given me the opportunity to say I'm sorry. It was actually meant for someone else. Not that that's going to make you feel any better. But I was so incensed by something or other you'd said that, between wine and anger, I sent it to you by mistake. You don't have to believe that of course, but it's true.
> >Besides, how could you not? > > You are very different here.. I don't think so at all. But then I think you are too.
> >The facts were all out there. Ex-U.K, living in Ontario, > >son relinquished in early '60's, reunited, adopted son, younger born-to > >son, lived in Cairo, maternity home, etc, etc, blah. I could go on. > >C'mon. Nobody's that stupid. > > I stopped reading your posts over there.. Kippa.. That's your problem. Anyway, if you'd been that curious you could have checked me out. You were always a pro at dredging stuff up.
> >> I met her on Origins.. Di Welfares site years ago.. > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Yes.. and I remember how funny you thought I was when I was sharing > some things that had upset me directly after my bsons birth. Such as? Show me. As I remember, I was almost entirely engaged in countering Di's borg. Anyway, how about when you expressed doubt that I'd even relinquished? That was charming. Or when you accused someone else of lying about their experience? I guess it's different when you do it.
> > > But I guess when you change your nic's.. you change your > >personality.. > > > >Change of personality? Look who's talking. > > Ah but I change and change again.. And again and again and again . . .
> and I am an open book.. of very questionable content.
> >> or.. the regulars here would not allow her to get away with her love > >> of the ones that do victim speak.. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Oh please.. Oh please, yourself.
> >But when I see people who are newly going through difficult times and who are > >still actively in distress being reproached for not being "at peace [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Unprotected sex.. That's not what you said and not what you meant. You've said it more than once.
> >Now, as far as my "support" of Joy is concerned - I've simply drawn > >attention to the fact that this steaming pile of sh.t was brought to [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > folks that support the victim speak and tell the ones that challenge > the said victim speak to shut the hell up or leave. Your opinion. Mine is that those people were actually causing harm by their relentless and insistent bullying.
> is bringing a pile of shite here? You got that right. So you could stir it.
> Right.. No one can say diddly squat about that place can they.. > Poooor poooor victims.. That's the kind of language that's *really* going to win friends and influence people.
> >I have also tried to correct > >misinformation that implied that the "offended" party was unable to > >read Joy's formal apology, and that he had no other venue where he > >could express himself.
> Ummmm what about the ones that read what joy wrote and did not go back > to Yahoo? Straw man argument. What d'you expect - effing skywriting? And *especially* annoying coming from someone who thinks all *they* have to do is say sorry, all better now. But then, it's different when you do it.
> >Dead socks? Sorry, no. I eat them live, like oysters, with a squeeze of > >lemon, and washed down with a pint of Guinness > > Enjoy.
> Jackie Jackie - 21 Dec 2006 12:59 GMT >> >> >jackie, >> >> >thats kippa? [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >uber-guru - and you responded in a way that seemed to indicate you >understood who I was. No.. I did not know who you were..
>> Show me where we actually discussed anything over there.. >> You made me sick over there and I wanted nothing to do with you. [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >I sent it to you by mistake. You don't have to believe that of course, >but it's true. Well you managed to insult me again..
But that's your stock and trade isn't it..
>> >Besides, how could you not? >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >checked me out. >You were always a pro at dredging stuff up. It was not that important to me.. Kippa.. as I really did not want to read your posts over there.. as your posts were part of the same old same old.. drivel.
>> >> I met her on Origins.. Di Welfares site years ago.. >> > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >Such as? Show me. As I remember, I was almost entirely engaged in >countering Di's borg. Hey.. I gave you a laugh.. My misery gave you a laugh.. I can not show you as I will never go near that place where Di has her Origins thingee as the provider charges money on my visa if I do..
>Anyway, how about when you expressed doubt that I'd even relinquished? >That was charming. Ohhhhh and that is the same as laughing when I shared about how freaked out I was when a priest stood over me.. after I had given birth..
>Or when you accused someone else of lying about their experience? >I guess it's different when you do it. [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] >That's not what you said and not what you meant. >You've said it more than once. Again you have decided that what I write is according to you..
>> >Now, as far as my "support" of Joy is concerned - I've simply drawn >> >attention to the fact that this steaming pile of sh.t was brought to [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >Mine is that those people were actually causing harm by their >relentless and insistent bullying. Well you are welcome to that place..
>> is bringing a pile of shite here? > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > >Straw man argument. Shows how much you care.. Hope something like that happens to you lady..
>What d'you expect - effing skywriting? How about an apology and not doing it again.. You know.. that silly thing that happens after an apology..
>And *especially* annoying coming from someone who thinks all *they* >have to do is say sorry, all better now. >But then, it's different when you do it. The people that I apologized to deserved an apology from me.. And we are talking about something that happened three years ago.. So it took me three years to apologize..
Jackie
Jackie - 21 Dec 2006 14:27 GMT >> >But when I see people who are newly going through difficult times and who are >> >still actively in distress being reproached for not being "at peace [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >That's not what you said and not what you meant. >You've said it more than once. I just checked Google..
Here is what I wrote about this particular subject..
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.adoption/msg/16d421137459b81f?hl=en&
>Underage teens should not be having sex without protection.. Don't you >agree with me? > >Underage teens should not be making babies when they can not care for >the baby.. Don't you agree with that? http://groups.google.com/group/alt.adoption/msg/555adc08675204ad?hl=en& You wrote in your spin..
>>But when I >>see people who are newly going through difficult times and who are >>still actively in distress being reproached for not being "at peace >>with their decisions"(among other platitudes), I get pissed. And >>remarks such as "underage people who should not be having sex" don't >>rate high with me either. I wrote to correct you..
>Unprotected sex.. End of quoting..
Jackie
Rhiannon - 21 Dec 2006 16:33 GMT > I just checked Google.. > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.adoption/msg/555adc08675204ad?hl=en& Both of the above links are in response to my post on the matter.
Of course I agree that people shouldn't have children if they know they really aren't going to be able to care for them. But the same thing applies to *anyone* who can't care for a child. Not just to minors. I don't understand the need for the distinction. I was refering to an opinion you voiced elsewhere, that was made with no provisos, "And I was not thinking of the minor that should not have been having sex in the first place.. "
Jackie - 22 Dec 2006 00:22 GMT >> I just checked Google.. >> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >Of course I agree that people shouldn't have children if they know they >really aren't going to be able to care for them. Then we agree..
>But the same thing applies to *anyone* who can't care for a child. >Not >just to minors. I don't understand the need for the distinction. Well what can I say.. or write..
>I was refering to an opinion you voiced elsewhere, that was made with >no provisos, "And I was not thinking of the minor that should not have >been having sex in the first place.. " Prove it.. Back up this statement Kippa..
If you can't do that leave it out..
Jackie
Rhiannon - 22 Dec 2006 01:07 GMT > >> I just checked Google.. > >> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > Well what can I say.. or write.. Well, isn't it true? Why the distinction?
> >I was refering to an opinion you voiced elsewhere, that was made with > >no provisos, "And I was not thinking of the minor that should not have [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > If you can't do that leave it out.. SofA. The thread was: Re: A womans right to make her own decision.. ? Reply #294 on: September 14, 2006, 05:28:10 PM ? http://soulofadoption.com/forum/index.php?topic=9614.0
" And I was not thinking of the minor that should not have been having sex in the first place... "
joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 22 Dec 2006 01:13 GMT Dear Someone, not telling who, but she always posts two dots after each sentence.
Here is a quote from that mystery woman:
I started changing my thinking when I watched them go after you in that other place.. Nothing justifies doing that kind of thing.. I have since met another gentleman like you dad.. He is a foster worker and adopted two children that have a lot of life issues to face..
They went after him as well.. One of the walking wounded accused this man of sending porn.. A totally unfounded accusation.. and this woman has since apologized.. but that kind of group lynching has made me sick.. angry and hoping one day I can make a difference in this kind
***************************************
It was ME! I am the one who said, I will say it again if he does it again, I have never denied saying it. I have never regretted saying it.
I felt his outrageous bullying deserved some outraged response.
I can't help it if you are only semi-literate.
It's like when that politician was asked to apologize for saying niggardly in a budget meeting, not his fault people don't know what the words mean.
joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 22 Dec 2006 03:31 GMT And again for our lady of two dots:
Pornography 3 : the depiction of acts in a sensational manner so as to arouse a quick intense emotional reaction <the pornography of violence>
It was violent, the original spread was posted in Hustler magazine in the 70's and came with a warning there. Hustler warned it's viewers that the the pictoral was disturbing, but this was posted without warning to a fostered adults forum.
And you are pissy that I am not apologizing?
Marley Greiner - 22 Dec 2006 18:01 GMT > And again for our lady of two dots: > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > And you are pissy that I am not apologizing? I friend of mine is former fire captain. He hates SH. He says over a year after the law was passed in Ohio the fire chief got a letter from the state with a list of instructions of how to handle a SH case. He says he glanced at it, decided it was stupid, and put it in file where he keeps all the rest of the stupid instructions he gets from the state.
Marley
Kathy - 18 Dec 2006 23:12 GMT > Kathy wrote.. > >> This is beginning to sound a lot like Christmas. ;-O [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Jackie Kippa eat dead socks? How does one do this?
Kathy
Jackie - 18 Dec 2006 23:49 GMT >Kippa eat dead socks? How does one do this? Ask her..
Jackie
Lilmtncbn - 19 Dec 2006 00:13 GMT eat dead socks? How does one do this?
> Kathy You have sons. Mine will wear theirs until they're ready to be buried. LOL
Kathy - 19 Dec 2006 00:24 GMT > eat dead socks? ?How does one do this? > > > > Kathy > > You have sons. Mine will wear theirs until they're ready to be buried. > LOL I still havw their fruit of the looms stuck on the third floor attics in houses I've sold.
Kathy (only the really smellllyones though)
Lilmtncbn - 18 Dec 2006 22:01 GMT > > This is beginning to sound a lot like Christmas. ;-O
>Jingle bells ding dong? I think you got the ding dong part right.
jwaartist@aol.com - 18 Dec 2006 22:09 GMT she didnt follow me here, i heard she was here so i came to get more accusations.
which, i got. lilmtnchbn, not sure what you mean by ding dong.
> > > This is beginning to sound a lot like Christmas. ? ;-O > > >Jingle bells ding dong? > > I think you got the ding dong part right. Robibnikoff - 19 Dec 2006 14:34 GMT > she didnt follow me here, i heard she was here so i came to get more > accusations. > > which, i got. lilmtnchbn, not sure what you mean by ding dong. Oh dear ;)
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
Kathy - 18 Dec 2006 22:42 GMT > > > joy, > > > [quoted text clipped - 177 lines] > > Jingle bells ding dong? Just like the well meaning relatives who come bearing gifts of joy. Maybe after three days, we can open the door and let the stench out, eh?
Kathy
KL - 19 Dec 2006 00:29 GMT >> This is beginning to sound a lot like Christmas. ;-O > > Jingle bells ding dong? Ding Dong the witch is dead??
--
KL
Robibnikoff - 19 Dec 2006 14:39 GMT >>> This is beginning to sound a lot like Christmas. ;-O >> >> Jingle bells ding dong? >> > Ding Dong the witch is dead?? Hey! Am not! :P
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
KL - 19 Dec 2006 20:31 GMT >>>> This is beginning to sound a lot like Christmas. ;-O >>> Jingle bells ding dong? >>> >> Ding Dong the witch is dead?? > > Hey! Am not! :P THANK GOODNESS!! Would miss our Resident Witchypoo!
--
KL
Robibnikoff - 19 Dec 2006 21:08 GMT >>>>> This is beginning to sound a lot like Christmas. ;-O >>>> Jingle bells ding dong? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > THANK GOODNESS!! Would miss our Resident Witchypoo! Yep, still dodging those buckets of water thrown by snotty little girls in pinaforms with their pesky scarecrow sidekicks ;)
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
KL - 19 Dec 2006 00:15 GMT >> joy, >> [quoted text clipped - 177 lines] > > Kathy Everywhere you go......
--
KL
Kathy - 19 Dec 2006 00:40 GMT > >> joy, > >> [quoted text clipped - 183 lines] > > KL LOL, holy smack!
I think you are on key.
Kathy
jwaartist@aol.com - 19 Dec 2006 01:25 GMT i have no idea on what any of you are talking about, but my goal was to get information which i did.
so have fun, at least i have MY truth out there and i hope that others can see the hurt that those people do cause and are willing to hurt innocent people if you dont agree with thier views.
so, there you go, have fun with your holiday songs. God bless you all.
joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 19 Dec 2006 06:53 GMT > i have no idea on what any of you are talking about, but my goal was > to get information which i did. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > so, there you go, have fun with your holiday songs. God bless you all. And I stand by every single word I have said, in case you missed that.
I hate the approximate, I didn't invent the lexicon just employed it.
isnotmyfault you are unfamiliar with it.
And Jackie, I thought you were at peace.. So why all the fighting?? Why all the dredging up?? Where is the Rumi??
I hope you are quite satisfied that I never needed no mods to protect me.. In fact, have been on my own quite a bit.. And feel quite fine..
But Scrappy/Dad/Charlie Peanuts/Jwart/ I suggest that you get on the phone to your lawyer straight away and explain in DETAIL the naughty and true things I said about your screen names.
Do not leave a single piece of "evidence" out. In excruciating detail. It is very important your counsel hear every last word/thought you have.
And God Bless you too!
Jackie - 19 Dec 2006 13:34 GMT >> i have no idea on what any of you are talking about, but my goal was >> to get information which i did. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >And I stand by every single word I have said, in case you missed that. Be careful Joy you may fall over..
>I hate the approximate, I didn't invent the lexicon just employed it. > >isnotmyfault you are unfamiliar with it. > >And Jackie, I thought you were at peace.. So why all the fighting?? Why >all the dredging up?? Where is the Rumi?? I am not fighting.. In fact I have just spent a bit of time apologizing to some of the folks here that I really upset in 2003..
And if you remember correctly Joy.. you and I had a private PM in which I told you that I held you responsible for what happened to dad and would no longer have anything to do with you.. And that was it.. I do not remember replying to your public messages and I can not remember if you pm'd me again but I believe I ignored you.. Or I worked very hard at ignoring.. you.
Other than speaking out for scrappy dad on Yahoo.. When you again.. went after him with false allegations..
>I hope you are quite satisfied that I never needed no mods to protect >me.. In fact, have been on my own quite a bit.. And feel quite fine.. Ah but joy.. do you not realized that some of the people on SofA are silenced.. Told they can not challenge certain people..
Others are golden and are allowed to challenge and argue and do whatever they want with encouragement from the moderators.. See the thread that started this fiasco. Why do you think some people have left? Do you even think about it?
On terms of myself and Rosalind.. Check out the times (please find one) when I tried to clarify what she had written and was not silenced..
>But Scrappy/Dad/Charlie Peanuts/Jwart/ I suggest that you get on the >phone to your lawyer straight away and explain in DETAIL the naughty >and true things I said about your screen names. He is documenting what you are saying about him Joy..
>Do not leave a single piece of "evidence" out. In excruciating detail. > It is very important your counsel hear every last word/thought you >have. > >And God Bless you too! Jackie
Kathy - 19 Dec 2006 21:19 GMT > >> i have no idea on what any of you are talking about, but my goal was > >> to get information which i did. [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > Ah but joy.. do you not realized that some of the people on SofA are > silenced.. Told they can not challenge certain people.. <snip>
> Others are golden and are allowed to Wait a mistletoe minute, because I thought I was the only "golden one" to post to this ng.
You meant to say, I have competition?
Kathy
<snip> challenge and argue and do
> whatever they want with encouragement from the moderators.. See the > thread that started this fiasco. [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Jackie Jackie - 20 Dec 2006 00:29 GMT I wrote..
>> Ah but joy.. do you not realized that some of the people on SofA are >> silenced.. Told they can not challenge certain people.. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >Wait a mistletoe minute, because I thought I was the only "golden one" >to post to this ng. I was speaking about SoA..
Now Kathy I do know you are the golden one here.. I bow in abeyance..
>You meant to say, I have competition? Never..
Jackie
jwaartist@aol.com - 19 Dec 2006 14:21 GMT im not the one suing, that lady, who owns some site, is suing me because i said she was dishonest. please!!!!!!!!! give me a break
she plays the 'you will be hearing from my lawyer' card baecause i hurt her feelings.....you and i know that untrue allegations towards me are all over her website....and she thinks she has a case...lol
you and i know how far she will go with this so called law suit, but she is pursuing this so i have to 'play along'.
you all know what i do for work, and she knows i have access to many many lawyers. I know she has no case, and my lawyers know also, but i was instructed if i was worried about it (only because her threats and the accusations that YOU have stated on that site and yahoo site efffects my childrens lives) that i should just cut and paste this stuff for my own insanity. believe me, im not having fun saving this crap on my computer....
joy "And I stand by every single word I have said, in case you missed that."
and this is what screws you all. you state that i downloaded child porn from a hustler magaizine the year you were born, and put them on that site.......not sure how you would prove it, when you and i know, and everyone on that site knows, that those allegations are false. i cant remember how old you were, but i dont think they had the internet when you were born and i dont think hustler magazine was downloading child porn.....the whole thing is riducoulous.
as for your buddy, even though she has no case, she has the right to sue anyone. if she broke a finger nail coming out of her car, she has the right to sue the car company. of course it doesnt mean she will win, and she will have to spend an awful lot of money to go forward, she has the right to sue.
so yes, she has the right to sue me, even though she has no case. i wish i could just disappear from these websites but i cant, not when your FRIEND threatens me with her law suits.
until i know my older son who is not yet legalized, is out of danger from her threats, then i will go away, but until then, i will continue to see where my name comes up and cut and paste all this freaking crap. all she has to say is, "i wont sue" then i will be gone forever.
but until then, cut and paste cut and paste cut and paste, though it might not go anywhere, and i probably wont even use it, it sure helps me sleep at night knowing if she threatens me and actually pursues these threats, that i have backup of what you people have said about me on your website.
in case you forgot on who is the one suing....please read:
"Joy - you've accused someone of being a spammer with NO evidence. Making that accusation here was bad enough, but fortunately, because of the jurisdiction in which SOA "exists," I can't be held liable for what you write. In addition, this jurisdiction doesn't recognize an online persona as a legal "person," ergo, they can't be legally defamed as long as their real (legal) identity isn't involved, so you can't be sued for defamation. But you've also posted your accusation on Yahoo. I don't know what the laws are in their jurisdiction - but unless their local laws are the same as mine, you could be in a shitload of trouble.
The individual you accused defamed me and this site - because my identity is on record, he defamed "me" - not just my online persona. I'll be handling that through the courts after the holiday. But in the meantime, I don't need you running around accusing him of spamming this site when you are in NO POSITION to posess ANY EVIDENCE he did so!
You had no way of knowing that I can't be held liable for your words here - do you realize how much of a risk you were taking? I could have been in a buttload of legal trouble because of what you said.
DON'T DO IT AGAIN!!!"
so you see joy, no where did i say i was suing her, she threatened me, and i would be a fool to just sit back and do nothing when my whole life can be turned upside down.
i dont take threats lightly joy...just so you know.....i will protect my children at all cost, and yes, her site is visable to anyone but me, but until i know she is dropping her lawsuit, i will go to lengths to fight her. like I need this crap from her like a hole in the head.......she has constantly broke her TOS and she will have to answer to that.
i really thought it was all over, but here we are again.....sleep tight, and think about how much fun you guys will have when she sues me and i have all this crap and believe me, if you dont think i will use it, i will.
i have no case now, but i will once she hands over a huge sum of cash to a lawyer and she pursues this. because once my name gets mentioned in her lawsuit, ill be good to go.
> > i have no idea on what any of you are talking about, but my goal was > > to get information which i did. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > > > so, there you go, have fun with your holiday songs. God bless you all.
> And I stand by every single word I have said, in case you missed that. > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > And God Bless you too! kat - 19 Dec 2006 16:35 GMT > im not the one suing, that lady, who owns some site, is suing me > because i said she was dishonest. please!!!!!!!!! give me a break [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > stuff for my own insanity. believe me, im not having fun saving this > crap on my computer.... Hardly sounds like you are being 'forced' to when lawyers have told you she doesn't have a case.
> joy > "And I stand by every single word I have said, in case you missed [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > win, and she will have to spend an awful lot of money to go forward, > she has the right to sue. Well she has to find a lawyer that would take the case first unless she is planning on handling it herself. How does she know your real name?
> so yes, she has the right to sue me, even though she has no case. i > wish i could just disappear from these websites but i cant, not when > your FRIEND threatens me with her law suits. Oh you could. I doubt anybody believes you are being 'forced' to stay on them despite your 'explanation'. Talk about playing the victim.
> until i know my older son who is not yet legalized, is out of danger > from her threats, then i will go away, but until then, i will continue > to see where my name comes up and cut and paste all this freaking crap. > all she has to say is, "i wont sue" then i will be gone forever. Somehow I doubt it.
> but until then, cut and paste cut and paste cut and paste, though it > might not go anywhere, and i probably wont even use it, it sure helps > me sleep at night knowing if she threatens me and actually pursues > these threats, that i have backup of what you people have said about me > on your website. Well there you go. You aren't being 'forced' to - you *choose* to to help yourself feel better/sleep better.
Kathy 1
k_eeks@yahoo.com - 19 Dec 2006 17:42 GMT TOP POST ALERT!! (I'm certain no one wants to read through this guy's drivel.)
You are so full of it. If you were being sued--and you were working with legal representation, you certainly wouldn't be posting here. You might read and record, but you'd keep your mouth shut.
And I believe the "ding dong" is meant to imply that you are a wacko.
> im not the one suing, that lady, who owns some site, is suing me > because i said she was dishonest. please!!!!!!!!! give me a break [quoted text clipped - 121 lines] > > > > And God Bless you too! Jackie - 20 Dec 2006 00:17 GMT >TOP POST ALERT!! (I'm certain no one wants to read through this guy's >drivel.) [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >And I believe the "ding dong" is meant to imply that you are a wacko. Who are you?
Jackie
>> im not the one suing, that lady, who owns some site, is suing me >> because i said she was dishonest. please!!!!!!!!! give me a break [quoted text clipped - 121 lines] >> > >> > And God Bless you too! k_eeks@yahoo.com - 20 Dec 2006 13:20 GMT > >TOP POST ALERT!! (I'm certain no one wants to read through this guy's > >drivel.) [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Jackie Hi Jackie, I'm KJ--you may remember me from years past. I still think this guy's full of it. At least about the lawyer stuff. I'm not arguing about what happened on some forum in the past.
kj
> >> im not the one suing, that lady, who owns some site, is suing me > >> because i said she was dishonest. please!!!!!!!!! give me a break [quoted text clipped - 121 lines] > >> > > >> > And God Bless you too! Jackie - 20 Dec 2006 23:42 GMT >Hi Jackie, I'm KJ--you may remember me from years past. I still think >this guy's full of it. At least about the lawyer stuff. I'm not >arguing about what happened on some forum in the past. I think he wants an apology. I think he deserves an apology..
I think Joy took the argument too far..
I do not think I can handle this place tonite.. I have been Christmas shopping all day and I think I got it done.. I will read a bit but I am not going to get into the thick of it.. Ya right..
I have forgotten who is who here but I am sure I will catch up..
Jackie
joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 21 Dec 2006 06:40 GMT I think he wants an apology. I think he deserves an apology..
Then I think he should be the one asking for it, what he has asked me to do is stop discussing this, linking him to this. I have agreed, you brought the subj. here, and then him.
It wouldn't have been brought up again at all, except for me wanting to answer your perseveration on the matter.
He has all the apology he is going to get out of me.
He has asked to DROP IT.
But really what concern is it of yours, if you are not doing clique think? Why would you want to repeatedly bring your "friend" into something that is painful for him, keep the subject alive I wonder?
You have apologized for the part you played in bringing it up again, and you keep playing the same part? Is that an apology or an obsfuscation?
With friends like you...
> >Hi Jackie, I'm KJ--you may remember me from years past. I still think > >this guy's full of it. At least about the lawyer stuff. I'm not [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Jackie Jackie - 22 Dec 2006 00:08 GMT >I think he wants an apology. I think he deserves an apology.. > >Then I think he should be the one asking for it, And he wants nothing to do with you..
> what he has asked me >to do is stop discussing this, linking him to this. I have agreed, you >brought the subj. here, and then him. I was discussing how toxic a closed forum is.. I was discussing how toxic Soul of Adoption is.. Dads issues were/are part of the main issue.. that being the moderators encourage some people and silence others.. And god help anyone that is the path of the ones being encouraged..
>It wouldn't have been brought up again at all, except for me wanting to >answer your perseveration on the matter. I never used your name Joy.. IMO you are making this up as you go along..
>He has all the apology he is going to get out of me. That is obvious..
>He has asked to DROP IT. Ohhh boo hooo I am so scared of you.. Maybe you should go and get your favorite moderators to help you..
>But really what concern is it of yours, if you are not doing clique >think? What in hell is clique think?
>Why would you want to repeatedly bring your "friend" into something >that is painful for him, keep the subject alive I wonder? So you do the nasty and it ends up my fault.. Perfect..
>You have apologized for the part you played in bringing it up again, >and you keep playing the same part? Is that an apology or an >obsfuscation? Ya lets drop it and you do not apologize..
>With friends like you... You are a spin doctor..
I did not mention dad before you arrived..
Here is the thread you started.. You started the thread on Dec. 16..
> Jackie, Here I am take me la la la >« Start of topic « Older Messages 1 - 10 of 157 Newer » End of topic » [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >Not yet ratedRating: >show options The day after you started that thread.. I posted about Scrappy dad.. There is nothing in the search engine before that.. nor is there anything in the search engine with your name posted by me..
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.adoption/msg/16d421137459b81f?hl=en&
snipped some..
>Please see my recent reply in the joy thread.. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >help/information on terms of his adopted children.. what he got was >agenda IMO. Show me where I mentioned him before this Joy.
Its easy btw.. just go to Google groups and go to advanced search and then put my name in as author and put in any key word you want.. Make sure alt.adoption is in the group section..
The thing is Joy you no longer have moderators here to shut me up before the truth comes out.. You are so used to making your horrible lying accusations.. and then no one is able to question you..
So Joy prove to me I mentioned the man before you came on here with this thread..
Jackie
k_eeks@yahoo.com - 21 Dec 2006 17:18 GMT > >Hi Jackie, I'm KJ--you may remember me from years past. I still think > >this guy's full of it. At least about the lawyer stuff. I'm not [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Jackie I'm sure you will too. Sorry about the shopping! I find shoppers in droves to be highly annoying and stinking of perfume.
kj
Jackie - 22 Dec 2006 00:26 GMT >> >Hi Jackie, I'm KJ--you may remember me from years past. I still think >> >this guy's full of it. At least about the lawyer stuff. I'm not [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >I'm sure you will too. Sorry about the shopping! I find shoppers in >droves to be highly annoying and stinking of perfume. Hubby and I went to Zellers and had fish and chips.. Big mistake.. Big big mistake.. and hubby has had two angioplasties.. He ate his and I left half of mine and went shopping.. forty percent off..
I got the son pajamas.. all less than ten dollars a pair..
Now I got to clean up the place as they are coming on Sunday.. Wrap the pajamas as well..
Jackie
joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 22 Dec 2006 01:03 GMT Dear She who shall not be named but who always posts two dots after every sentence.
I just saw some other posts here where you bad mouth other women from that site for having unmarried sex.
So this is just a lifestyle choice for you?
You just go around posting banal and unoriginal insults about people from different sites on other sites?
Fascinating, Maybe you could take an adult education class and breathe new life into your vocabulary instead?
> >> >Hi Jackie, I'm KJ--you may remember me from years past. I still think > >> >this guy's full of it. At least about the lawyer stuff. I'm not [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > Jackie Rhiannon - 19 Dec 2006 19:08 GMT > jwaartist@aol.com wrote: > . . . i was instructed . . . that i should just cut and paste this stuff for my own insanity. Huh? You want to preserve your own insanity? That's insane. But it looks like it's working.
Marley - 19 Dec 2006 19:09 GMT Top posting: Are we in the middle of an Ionesco play?
Marley
> im not the one suing, that lady, who owns some site, is suing me > because i said she was dishonest. please!!!!!!!!! give me a break [quoted text clipped - 121 lines] > > > > And God Bless you too! rkbose@pacific.net.sg - 21 Dec 2006 01:37 GMT Topper posting: It felt rather like that. New characters keep walking on and saying things that are comprehensible to the other players but not to the audience.
> Top posting: Are we in the middle of an Ionesco play? > [quoted text clipped - 125 lines] > > > > > > And God Bless you too! Lilmtncbn - 21 Dec 2006 05:15 GMT On Dec 20, 6:37pm, "rkb...@pacific.net.sg" <rkb...@pacific.net.sg> wrote:
> Topper posting: It felt rather like that. New characters keep walking > on and saying things that are comprehensible to the other players but > not to the audience. Yep. LOL
Robibnikoff - 21 Dec 2006 14:15 GMT On Dec 20, 6:37pm, "rkb...@pacific.net.sg" <rkb...@pacific.net.sg> wrote:
> Topper posting: It felt rather like that. New characters keep walking > on and saying things that are comprehensible to the other players but > not to the audience. Yep. LOL
Is this the alt.adoption version of "Waiting for Godot"? ;)
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
Kathy - 21 Dec 2006 18:06 GMT > On Dec 20, 6:37pm, "rkb...@pacific.net.sg" <rkb...@pacific.net.sg> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Is this the alt.adoption version of "Waiting for Godot"? ;) Now you owe me a keyboard! hahaha
Kathy
joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 21 Dec 2006 19:25 GMT So Jackie,
How come you never answered my question about how if "our dad" gack, keeps asking for something to be dropped and you drool, worship, on your knees for adore him, don't respect his wishes?
God, so glad to be spared friends like you.
ltlmtncbn:
Thanks again for the compliments, am I understanding you right that you think I am anti-adoption? Just curious
Robibnikoff - 21 Dec 2006 19:44 GMT >> On Dec 20, 6:37pm, "rkb...@pacific.net.sg" <rkb...@pacific.net.sg> >> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Now you owe me a keyboard! hahaha Woohoo! Happy holidays! :)
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
Robibnikoff - 19 Dec 2006 14:34 GMT > i have no idea on what any of you are talking about, but my goal was > to get information which i did. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > so, there you go, have fun with your holiday songs. God bless you all. Pardon me, but WTF?
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
jwaartist@aol.com - 19 Dec 2006 20:04 GMT no offence kathy and ro,
but i dont know who you are, so im not sure why the responces and the concern of me reading these posts are bothering you.
Its really quite simple, a woman by the name of joy has stated on numerous websites, that i have downloaded child porn and i hacked into a system and downloaded other porn. she started a thread about it here also. though not directed to me, it did come up.
yes, it does bother me, and it bothers me alot. There is nothing worse then being accused of things you didnt do. there are people that i have gotten to know over the years, like jackie and donna, who have posted, and part of the reason i come out in defence of myself is because i dont want to lost the friendships that i have made with some people.
I have lost alot of the support that i had due to people believeing what was being said about me, and that is fine, because who needs support anyway.
I adopted two special needs kids, who were having a hard time and i found these forums to be a place of support. I then followed my support system when alot of them moved to SOA and then i met others, like joy.
the 'new' people started to attack me, and i wasnt really quite sure why, nor did i care, which is no big deal, but to then start to throw viscious accusations about me, that i downloaded child porn from a hustler magaziine, i find disgusting and it was a little too much, so i got angry.
so that is why i am here, she did it again. if she never mentioned that i downloaded child porn, i would of just let it go.
i didnt come here to make friends with you, i am done with all this forum support crap, but i wont let this woman continue stating lies about me.
i have never met so many heartless woman in my whole life.
what gets me is how others can put themselves in another persons shoes. My God, how would you feel if i went around and said that you are downloading child porn, would you care? would you care if i threatened your family with law suits? would you care?
clearly im a little more empathetic then alot of you on these sites, and that is why i am done with them.
but this thread has nothing to do with you guys, it has to do with the viscious rumors that joy is spreading about ME!!!!!!!! not you.
yes, it would be so easy to just walk away, and believe me, i wish i could, but not when i am being threatened with law suits.
so lets talk about choice....yea, i have a choice, and i choice to defend my name of these viscious rumors. i have a choice while i am being suied to say 'durrrrrrr' or fight back with these allegations.
your correct, i do have a choice.
i am not even sure why i am explaining any of this to you. This is between joy, jackie and myself.
but just think for a minute if someone who you dont know, was going from forum to forum telling people that you are downloading child porn.
yes, It bothers me, maybe it wouldnt bother you, but i find it digusting to spread a rumor like that for someones sick pleasure.
this place feels like SOA..makes me wonder if thats where you all are from.
Robibnikoff - 19 Dec 2006 21:03 GMT > no offence kathy and ro, > > but i dont know who you are, so im not sure why the responces and the > concern of me reading these posts are bothering you. Jeeze hon, get some basic grammar skills. Reading this is giving me a headache.
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
jwaartist@aol.com - 19 Dec 2006 20:04 GMT no offence kathy and ro,
but i dont know who you are, so im not sure why the responces and the concern of me reading these posts are bothering you.
Its really quite simple, a woman by the name of joy has stated on numerous websites, that i have downloaded child porn and i hacked into a system and downloaded other porn. she started a thread about it here also. though not directed to me, it did come up.
yes, it does bother me, and it bothers me alot. There is nothing worse then being accused of things you didnt do. there are people that i have gotten to know over the years, like jackie and donna, who have posted, and part of the reason i come out in defence of myself is because i dont want to lost the friendships that i have made with some people.
I have lost alot of the support that i had due to people believeing what was being said about me, and that is fine, because who needs support anyway.
I adopted two special needs kids, who were having a hard time and i found these forums to be a place of support. I then followed my support system when alot of them moved to SOA and then i met others, like joy.
the 'new' people started to attack me, and i wasnt really quite sure why, nor did i care, which is no big deal, but to then start to throw viscious accusations about me, that i downloaded child porn from a hustler magaziine, i find disgusting and it was a little too much, so i got angry.
so that is why i am here, she did it again. if she never mentioned that i downloaded child porn, i would of just let it go.
i didnt come here to make friends with you, i am done with all this forum support crap, but i wont let this woman continue stating lies about me.
i have never met so many heartless woman in my whole life.
what gets me is how others can put themselves in another persons shoes. My God, how would you feel if i went around and said that you are downloading child porn, would you care? would you care if i threatened your family with law suits? would you care?
clearly im a little more empathetic then alot of you on these sites, and that is why i am done with them.
but this thread has nothing to do with you guys, it has to do with the viscious rumors that joy is spreading about ME!!!!!!!! not you.
yes, it would be so easy to just walk away, and believe me, i wish i could, but not when i am being threatened with law suits.
so lets talk about choice....yea, i have a choice, and i choice to defend my name of these viscious rumors. i have a choice while i am being suied to say 'durrrrrrr' or fight back with these allegations.
your correct, i do have a choice.
i am not even sure why i am explaining any of this to you. This is between joy, jackie and myself.
but just think for a minute if someone who you dont know, was going from forum to forum telling people that you are downloading child porn.
yes, It bothers me, maybe it wouldnt bother you, but i find it digusting to spread a rumor like that for someones sick pleasure.
this place feels like SOA..makes me wonder if thats where you all are from.
kat - 19 Dec 2006 20:38 GMT > no offence kathy and ro, > > but i dont know who you are, so im not sure why the responces and the > concern of me reading these posts are bothering you. They aren't 'bothering me'. What makes you think they are? Because I responded to a post? LOL that's what a newsgroup is all about duh. Do you only respond to posts that 'bother' you?
> Its really quite simple, a woman by the name of joy has stated on > numerous websites, that i have downloaded child porn and i hacked into > a system and downloaded other porn. she started a thread about it here > also. though not directed to me, it did come up. I think we can all read.
> yes, it does bother me, and it bothers me alot. There is nothing worse > then being accused of things you didnt do. there are people that i [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > forum support crap, but i wont let this woman continue stating lies > about me. Well that's your problem there. This ain't no 'support' group. Sure people can and do give support, they also can and do give crap.
> i have never met so many heartless woman in my whole life. oh boo hoo
> what gets me is how others can put themselves in another persons shoes. > My God, how would you feel if i went around and said that you are > downloading child porn, would you care? Nope. You are just words on a screen to me.
would you care if i
> threatened your family with law suits? Nope because I take everything I read on a newsgroup with a grain of salt.
>would you care? Nope because I would think you are full of crap and running at the mouth. People frequently 'threaten' lawsuits on the net. We've had our share of posters here who have done the same - Mark comes to mind.
> clearly im a little more empathetic then alot of you on these sites, > and that is why i am done with them. Bwaaaaaaaaaaa That or you are seriously confused about how these things work.
> but this thread has nothing to do with you guys, it has to do with the > viscious rumors that joy is spreading about ME!!!!!!!! not you. Big deal. It's a public forum. That means it is open for all to comment on. You *are* seriously confused about how these things work.
> yes, it would be so easy to just walk away, and believe me, i wish i > could, but not when i am being threatened with law suits. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > i am not even sure why i am explaining any of this to you. This is > between joy, jackie and myself. Then take it to email. If it's on a *public* forum it is open to *public* debate - understand now?
> but just think for a minute if someone who you dont know, was going > from forum to forum telling people that you are downloading child porn. Yawn.
> yes, It bothers me, maybe it wouldnt bother you, but i find it > digusting to spread a rumor like that for someones sick pleasure. Yes it's disgusting and it speaks to the person doing it now doesn't it?
> this place feels like SOA..makes me wonder if thats where you all are > from. Nope. Google is your friend. BTW you never answered my question about how she knows your real name. Is that a requirement of joining SOA?
Kathy 1
joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 19 Dec 2006 21:00 GMT I certainly don't know his real name unless it really is Scrappy-Dad-Charlie-Peanuts-Jwart. No you don't have to enter a real name to be a member of the sofa.
User name and pw.
I thought he wanted to sue because of defamation of screen name. And now he claims it is going to disrupt an adoption? Puuhhlleeeze. Oh am I meant to be rushing in with tea and sympathy, a dab at the eye for the long suffering superior savior adad? If you haven't noticed, I am not stupid.
You and your ilk think it is quite fine to bash on who you like, but then get all hyperbolic and butt-hurt when treated in kind.
Posting that crap was unconscionable, and of course you use your spin, to make it seem as if you were the victim.
It made you angry after I called bitch on what you did? Then what were you when you were doing it? Was that your calm self?
> > no offence kathy and ro, > > [quoted text clipped - 109 lines] > > Kathy 1 jwaartist@aol.com - 19 Dec 2006 21:27 GMT kippa, to think i actually liked you at one point. do you honestly think i downloaded child porn to SOA.....
kathy i have no idea what kind of forum this is, so thank you for letting me know. its just alot of crap.
yes, the owner of that site who is suing me, knows where i work, my name, where i live...joy doesnt.
you know what guys, this was all fun when it went down on SOA, when you guys would call me a.s hole and other things. we had a good time, a few laughs on each others expence, and the game the was fun.
but its over!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I have been banned from that site. but for some reason, you game is getting uglier uglier.
the accusations of downloading child porn are extrememly serious and you can get me in alot of trouble. i got news for you folks, if i called the policesand said that joymaden is downloading child porn on the innternet, they can easily track her down.
so knock it off joy, your really starting to get me pist off.
Robibnikoff - 19 Dec 2006 21:39 GMT > kippa, > to think i actually liked you at one point. do you honestly think i [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > so knock it off joy, your really starting to get me pist off. Squeeze me?
 Signature Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557 I think religion is so popular because even the village idiot can feel like Einstein without any effort. - Denis Loubet
kat - 21 Dec 2006 13:06 GMT > kippa, > to think i actually liked you at one point. do you honestly think i [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > yes, the owner of that site who is suing me, knows where i work, my > name, where i live...joy doesnt. *How* does she know that?
> the accusations of downloading child porn are extrememly serious and > you can get me in alot of trouble. i got news for you folks, if i
> called the policesand said that joymaden is downloading child porn on > the innternet, they can easily track her down. So is *that* how the *owner* knows your info? But I thought you said that she was suing you for slandering her. Did the police get a call from her saying you were downloading porn and they supplied her with your info? I seriously doubt it.
Kathy 1
Jackie - 22 Dec 2006 00:18 GMT >> kippa, >> to think i actually liked you at one point. do you honestly think i [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >*How* does she know that? She is very computer literate.. and she is on a mission IMO..
I wonder if she is going to sue me now.. I am trashing her place here.. My email is very easy to find..
Maybe she will sue me and dad..
>> the accusations of downloading child porn are extrememly serious and >> you can get me in alot of trouble. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >So is *that* how the *owner* knows your info? Dad does not know how underhanded some people can be on the net.. IMO He is a good man and is not used to swimming with sharks..
> But I thought you said that >she was suing you for slandering her. And now I am doing the very same thing..
> Did the police get a call from her >saying you were downloading porn and they supplied her with your info? I >seriously doubt it. The porn is Joys lie.. Not the owner of SoA.. The owner of SoA is the one responsible for her cooking this up tho.. But then dad is not allowed to speak of this..
Shhhhh do not write a thing about that place..
Jackie
Jackie - 20 Dec 2006 00:27 GMT >If you haven't noticed, I am >not stupid. On a bit of an ego trip.. eh Joy.
Jackie
joymadsen21@yahoo.com - 20 Dec 2006 04:28 GMT Oh Jackie, my ego trip is actually a long extended cruise, well that's how I like to think of it.
Complete with buffets and discos, God I handed you that one on a silver platter, thought twice before sending it, left myself belly up and still you flubbed it.
I appreciate that about you.
> >If you haven't noticed, I am > >not stupid.On a bit of an ego trip.. eh Joy. > > Jackie
|
|
|