14 years is all she gets for killing her daughter? That is sad in my eyes.
--
KL
> 14 years is all she gets for killing her daughter? That is sad in my eyes.
>
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
> > "Her words, through a third party, were that she snapped," he said,
> > referring to a law-enforcement report.
> > "The three counts yielded 13 years and eight months in state prison for
> > Gill, 50. With credits for good conduct, she could be released in 11 to"
She could be out on the street in 51/2 years of good time. A
"good"person, a "good" mother, a "good" wife. Wonder if this idiot that
calls himself her husband will remain married to this "good" person. He
better watch his back! Along with her own daughter as this daughter is
the one who questioned where is this little girl. Or no on would have
ever have been concerned...not even that "good" dad.
And just what is she accepting responsiblity for and how, she took a
lesser plea, to save her own a.s...not because she was accepting
responsibility!
> >" Before being adopted by the Gills, Lillian had suffered an abusive life
> > and was found by authorities with little food available to her"
Abusive in what way, little food, or yeah, as usual vague as what would
be abusive..if this young girl was taken by cps it could be a anything,
like not having a coat. Cps needed another child to be put into the
adoption machine making money off of another child, and the child
expendable, as they always seem to be to our system here in U.S.
MURDER is abuse!
At least wherever she was before being placed with this woman that just
snapped she was alive! LEGALIZED MURDER and she will be walking the
streets,,,probably adopting again or maybe even fostering as those kids
NEED to be dumped somewhere even with a MURDER.
yts
BitterHarvest - 30 Dec 2006 23:43 GMT
> > 14 years is all she gets for killing her daughter? That is sad in my eyes.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
> She could be out on the street in 51/2 years of good time. A
> "good"person, a "good" mother, a "good" wife.
Now come on yts, surely you know by now that all 'good' mothers murder
their children sooner or later?
Wonder if this idiot that
> calls himself her husband will remain married to this "good" person. He
> better watch his back! Along with her own daughter as this daughter is
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> lesser plea, to save her own a.s...not because she was accepting
> responsibility!
If she was truly remorseful and accepted resonsibility for murdering
another mother's child she would strap herself to an electric chair
and pull the switch herself. Images of the Green Mile springing to
mind.
> > >" Before being adopted by the Gills, Lillian had suffered an abusive life
> > > and was found by authorities with little food available to her"
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> adoption machine making money off of another child, and the child
> expendable, as they always seem to be to our system here in U.S.
Poverty is not only neglect but is now abuse as well? I don't suppose
it would have dawned on the CPS workers to fill the fridge with some
food.
> MURDER is abuse!
Not if one is a "good" adoptive mother.
> At least wherever she was before being placed with this woman that just
> snapped she was alive! LEGALIZED MURDER and she will be walking the
> streets,,,probably adopting again or maybe even fostering as those kids
> NEED to be dumped somewhere even with a MURDER.
That reminds me of a couple who lived on a farm and adopted an
infant. They fed it cows milk and within four months the baby had died
of a gastro intestinal infection. After killing off their first
adopted child the Department, probably too busy to keep burying little
bodies, gave them a replacement but warned them not to feed this one
cows milk.
Darth Breather - 31 Dec 2006 04:21 GMT
> That reminds me of a couple who lived on a farm and adopted an
> infant. They fed it cows milk and within four months the baby had died
> of a gastro intestinal infection. After killing off their first
> adopted child the Department, probably too busy to keep burying little
> bodies, gave them a replacement but warned them not to feed this one
> cows milk.
Cows milk isnt usally [poisonus.
BitterHarvest - 31 Dec 2006 04:46 GMT
> > That reminds me of a couple who lived on a farm and adopted an
> > infant. They fed it cows milk and within four months the baby had died
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Cows milk isnt usally [poisonus.
It is for newborns if it's straight from the cow and isn't pasteurised
or boiled first.
BitterHarvest - 31 Dec 2006 04:58 GMT
> > That reminds me of a couple who lived on a farm and adopted an
> > infant. They fed it cows milk and within four months the baby had died
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Cows milk isnt usally [poisonus.
PS. I meant to add that babies can't digest cows milk, which is why
they are given formula, if they can't be breastfed.
Robibnikoff - 31 Dec 2006 10:39 GMT
>> That reminds me of a couple who lived on a farm and adopted an
>> infant. They fed it cows milk and within four months the baby had died
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Cows milk isnt usally [poisonus.
Came across some instructions from Spence-Chapin which my amom had put in
with all the "Congrats on your new baby" cards they received from their
friends when I was born (which I also recently threw away). It was a recipe
for my "formula" and consisted of cows milk with a teaspoon of karo syrup.
Obviously, I survived the experience.

Signature
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557