Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Adoption / April 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

S.F. woman gives birth on sidewalk and abandons baby

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Lilmtncbn - 24 Apr 2007 11:42 GMT
Geez, another one.  Tried to post this yesterday, but Google was not
being my friend.

http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_5731628

S.F. woman gives birth on sidewalk and abandons baby
Bay City News Service
Article Launched: 04/23/2007 05:58:55 AM PDT

A San Francisco woman gave birth to a baby boy on the sidewalk Sunday
night then walked away, pretending that it never happened, said San
Francisco police Capt. Al Casciato.
Casciato said someone called 911 after the woman was seen birthing her
baby on Fifth and Stevenson streets, at around 9:34 p.m.

When an ambulance arrived, a five-pound 12-ounce baby boy was found
alive, but his mother was nowhere to be found, said Casciato.

In a scenario reminiscent of a March 9 birth that occurred on an
Oakland sidewalk, Casciato said a woman believed to be the baby's
mother was spotted about a block and a half away, covered in blood.

According to Casciato, the woman, who was unable to give her name,
denied giving birth.

She was taken to the hospital in police custody, where she exhibited
psychotic behavior and needed to be restrained, Casciato said.

Police have not been able to positively identify the woman, who is
thought to be homeless and around 35 years old. Casciato said the
woman maybe named Nadine Matthews, but police have not yet been able
to confirm this information.

Of the sidewalk birth, Casciato said it was probably "the best thing
that could have happened to that child."

He said the baby is in good condition at an area hospital and is in
the custody of Child Protective Services.

The woman remains hospitalized and faces charges of child endangerment.
doug thomas - 24 Apr 2007 12:13 GMT
snipped
> The woman remains hospitalized and faces charges of child endangerment.

If the woman was mentally ill, and homeless, how does leaving the child
sidewalk birth probably was the best thing for the child.

Doug Thomas
Dad - 24 Apr 2007 16:13 GMT
> If the woman was mentally ill, and homeless, how does leaving the child
> sidewalk birth probably was the best thing for the child.
>
> Doug Thomas

Depends on which of the two scenarios you think has the best chance of
a positive outcome.

If I were an infant (open door - take shot here), I'm not sure that I
would be best served by being cared for by my homeless, mentally ill
mother.  If my mom was capable of giving birth on a sidewalk and
walking away, we're not talking about a small mental health issue
here.

I'd probably take my chances on being abandoned in a public place.

Dad
Robibnikoff - 24 Apr 2007 14:34 GMT
> Geez, another one.  Tried to post this yesterday, but Google was not
> being my friend.
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> The woman remains hospitalized and faces charges of child endangerment.

Gak, that is just nasty. Didn't anyone try to help her?
Signature

Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557

Steve  White - 25 Apr 2007 04:13 GMT
> > Geez, another one.  Tried to post this yesterday, but Google was
> > not being my friend.
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> Gak, that is just nasty. Didn't anyone try to help her?

How, exactly?

steve
KL - 24 Apr 2007 21:12 GMT
> Geez, another one.  Tried to post this yesterday, but Google was not
> being my friend.
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> The woman remains hospitalized and faces charges of child endangerment.

First off...how could there be bystanders yet again, especially in light
of the same thing having happened last month across the bay?

It also makes me wonder about why she didn't just Safe Haven the baby?
OH! Could it be because Safe Haven laws do NOT help save the babies that
it claims to?

--

KL
rkbose@pacific.net.sg - 26 Apr 2007 06:07 GMT
> It also makes me wonder about why she didn't just Safe Haven the baby?
> OH! Could it be because Safe Haven laws do NOT help save the babies that
> it claims to?

Apparently she was "exhibiting psychotic behaviour."

They arrested her 1.5 blocks from where she had abandoned the kid,
which she said was not hers.
The charge was "Child endangerment."

I don't think there's much that can help people who have mental
illness in these situations.
KL - 26 Apr 2007 18:03 GMT
>> It also makes me wonder about why she didn't just Safe Haven the baby?
>> OH! Could it be because Safe Haven laws do NOT help save the babies that
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I don't think there's much that can help people who have mental
> illness in these situations.

That's my point....but God forbid the M's ever see the reality of it.

--

KL
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.