Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Adoption / July 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

amending birth certs

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
rtdavide@yahoo.com - 14 Jul 2007 16:46 GMT
OK, the reasons for this question are complicated, but I am an adult
adoptee. I am seeking dual citizenship and the adoption is causing a
problem with this. It won't block it, but it does make it quite a bit
more complicated because I am seeking citizenship through my birth
family.
The consulate actually advised me to circumvent the issue by having
the name changed on the original birth certificate. They suggested
that my birth mother could ask for an amendment.

I was born in California, I went through the court process and got
copies of the original sealed birth certificate.
The state says that the amendment process could be used to fill in
blanks, and sure enough the name is left blank on the original birth
cert. So it seems it may be an option, if my birth mother attempts
this.

Aside from all the other issues surrounding name change [which to be
honest, I am nearly certain I won't even attempt it] I believe the
california webpage detailing birth cert amendments does NOT apply to
original sealed birth certs. But since several of the consulate people
are suggesting this, I wanted to know if it were even possible. I
don't think it is, but I thought I would ask on a forum where some of
you might know...
Can an original sealed California birth cert be amended?
Even by the biological mother?

thanks,
dave
Sand - 15 Jul 2007 05:55 GMT
On Jul 14, 10:46 am, rtdav...@yahoo.com wrote:
> OK, the reasons for this question are complicated, but I am an adult
> adoptee. I am seeking dual citizenship and the adoption is causing a
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> thanks,
> dave

I asked this same question to the State of California myself. I don't
recall the name of the agency, but I was told, no, I cannot change the
sealed certificate. In my case, I was seeing if I could become a
member of my Birthfather's Indian tribe. I'm currently his only son
and he really wanted me to become enrolled as a member. When I got the
OBC, of course, his name wasn't on it. B-mom left his name off of it.
We have had the DNA test and he definitely is my b-dad, though. Since
there isn't any father's name on the birth certificate, we just fill
out an easy form, have both parents sign and VOILA! he's on there.
EXCEPT as an adoptee, I can't do that. I was told that the sealed
record CANNOT be changed. I haven't actually tried it, but It seems
that this would be a good test case to see if the State could be
forced to add my b-dad's name to the sealed record. They do it for non-
adoptees, so why not for me? And I also have the Federal Indian Child
Welfare Act that is supposed to help keep Indian children from being
removed from their culture as well as help to re-unite families broken
up by adoption. If I was wealthy, I might try the fight to get his
name on my OBC.
rtdavide@yahoo.com - 17 Jul 2007 17:25 GMT
> I asked this same question to the State of California myself. I don't
> recall the name of the agency, but I was told, no, I cannot change the
> sealed certificate.

As the adoptees, i would expect we couldn't do it, but I wonder if the
birth mother would have the option?
she may have to go through a court order to do this, I'm not sure.

I guess I'm going to have to call the state..... never any fun.... and
ask if this is even legally possible to do.
thanks for the input.
Marley Greiner - 17 Jul 2007 18:13 GMT
>> I asked this same question to the State of California myself. I don't
>> recall the name of the agency, but I was told, no, I cannot change the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> birth mother would have the option?
> she may have to go through a court order to do this, I'm not sure.

I don't know about a change of obs, but I know in Ohio fro what I gather, if
a father is added to the bc or a child is legitimized, it has to go through
Children's Services, a DNA test, and a court order.

Marley
> I guess I'm going to have to call the state..... never any fun.... and
> ask if this is even legally possible to do.
> thanks for the input.
rtdavide@yahoo.com - 19 Jul 2007 15:45 GMT
On Jul 17, 10:13 am, "Marley Greiner" <maddogmar...@worldnet.att.net>
wrote:
> <rtdav...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Having talked to 2 separate people in Sacramento, the consensus is
that there is no procedure for legally amending the original. I
suppose it may be possible to make a legal case, and set a precedent,
but for now, basically, it looks like amending original birth certs is
not an option.

by the way Marley, I believe that the procedure is more or less the
same for amending non-sealed birth certs here in Cali. The state
details what kind of things can be added amended, but there is a
procedure for adjudication of parentage.
Marley Greiner - 20 Jul 2007 04:50 GMT
> On Jul 17, 10:13 am, "Marley Greiner" <maddogmar...@worldnet.att.net>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> but for now, basically, it looks like amending original birth certs is
> not an option.

I agree with you but it could be interesting to make precedent. But don't
you know you are an immaciulate conception?

> by the way Marley, I believe that the procedure is more or less the
> same for amending non-sealed birth certs here in Cali. The state
> details what kind of things can be added amended, but there is a
> procedure for adjudication of parentage.

I know there's been a move from the feds for several years now for women to
put the father on the bc.  Without it, it's very difficult to collect aid.
I knew this guy when I lived in Eugene who had 2 kids with the same woman.
They had a very rocky relationship (I have no idea why they had anything to
do with each other--it was very bad), but were always together,.  He spent a
lot of time with the older kid (the other was born around the time I left),
spent a lot of money on them, and handed over more cash for what I thought
were unreasonable demands.    She refused to put him on the bcs of their
kids because it would "embarrass" her parents.  Of course, her parents knew
he was the father, so what's the deal?  I find it disturbing that she'd
prefer to have her kids listed as a "bastards" than reveal his name.  Or
maybe she was embarrassed that she was sleeping with him?

Marley
Sand - 21 Jul 2007 05:36 GMT
On Jul 19, 10:50 pm, "Marley Greiner" <maddogmar...@worldnet.att.net>
wrote:
> <rtdav...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

It appears that if you were NOT adopted and you can get BOTH parents
to sign a Declaration of Paternity, then the birthfather can be ADDED
to the birth certificate, as long as no other father is listed.
Unfortunately, since your OBC is sealed, it isn't an option.

I was told that the sealed certificate can't be amended by someone in
the office of Amended Records (916)557-6075.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.