Diplomat "dumped his adopted child because she did not fit in"
Times Online, December 14, 2007
http://www.timesonl ine.co.uk/ tol/news/ world/europe/ article3048747. ece
by Roger Boyes in Berlin
A diplomat accused of "dumping" his adopted daughter flew home
yesterday, after triggering a row about the ethics of Europeans
adopting Asian children.
Jade, a 7-year-old of South Korean origin, is the focus of an
escalating dispute across two continents. At the age of 4 months, she
was adopted by a Dutch consular officer based in Hong Kong, Raymond
Poeteray, and his wife Meta.
But the couple have now surrendered Jade to the Hong Kong social
welfare department for re-adoption, reportedly because the child
could not adapt to Dutch culture.
The revelation has sparked protests, amid claims that the couple were
treating the child as if she were an unwanted present. She had been
discarded like "a piece of household rubbish", said the Dutch
daily, "De Telegraaf".
Mr and Mrs Poeteray, back in the Netherlands yesterday, defended
their actions, claiming that they had acted on medical advice. Mr
Poeteray, 55, said that when the family moved from Indonesia to Hong
Kong three years ago, "medical specialists" said that Jade
had "serious bonding problems".
They embarked on family therapy, but without success. "To our great
disappointment, things didn't get better, they got worse; and the
rest of the family began to suffer hugely from that," he said. The
couple have an older son, and a younger child born after Jade's
adoption.
By the middle of last year they were being urged by doctors, social
workers, and the adoption agency, Mothers Choice, to place the child
in temporary care, the diplomat said in an open letter to "De
Telegraaf".
"Although the specialists now think it is not possible that Jade can
be brought home, we continue to hope. We will do our best to find a
solution, allowing her to find happiness in her life," he
wrote. "This is a private matter, for which we as parents bear the
responsibility ... the publicity itself is already painful enough,
but what's worse is it doesn't help us find a solution for our
problems."
The Poeterays never applied for Dutch citizenship for Jade, but claim
that this was an administrative oversight.
The family's plea for privacy and understanding has been ignored.
Online chatrooms have hosted hundreds of comments about the case,
most of which condemned the actions of a public servant paid to
represent his country. "Of course, a child that has been given away
for adoption is going to have a fear of emotional bonding!" said
Anna, from Lelystad, on the "De Telegraaf" website.
Another said: "What would they have done if their own children had
been sick? Would they have given them away? This man is sick himself -
can't he be given away?"
The Dutch Foreign Ministry, embarrassed by the international fuss,
has recalled the diplomat for consultations, but is standing by him.
Many Dutch bloggers, however, argue that he has committed an offence
against natural justice, and that he should resign from the
diplomatic service.
One blogger found a reference to a party that the Poeterays held in
January 2005, in which one grateful guest thanked the diplomat, "his
lovely wife Meta, and young son Jamie". There was no mention of Jade,
suggesting that she was not fully accepted as a member of the family.
The hostility is in part because the case has stoked up lingering
suspicions about the commitment of Europeans to adopted Asian
children. Two years ago an Irish couple caused outrage in Asia when
they returned a child to an Indonesian orphanage, saying that she did
not fit in.
The South Korean Consulate in Hong Kong said that Mr and Mrs Poeteray
had complained that Jade was not adapting to Dutch culture or
food. "That is the reason they gave for why they want to discontinue
the relationship, " a South Korean official said.
This was met with incredulity. "They adopted her when she was a
baby," said Law Chi-kwong, a professor at the department of social
work at Hong Kong University. "They are responsible for shaping the
child's mind and culture. How can you say that the child cannot adapt
to the culture in which she was raised?"
Dutch newspapers tracked down a former babysitter yesterday, who took
care of Jade when she was a baby in Indonesia. She too was bemused by
the fate of the little girl, whom she remembers as a quiet but normal
child. "I took care of her in the evenings, while an Indonesian woman
was with her in the daytime," she told "De Telegraaf". "But Meta did
not treat Jade as her real daughter."
Hong Kong authorities are searching for new adoptive parents. Jade
speaks Cantonese and English and, despite the claims that she could
not communicate with her parents, some Dutch.
------------ --------
rkbose@pacific.net.sg - 16 Dec 2007 06:45 GMT
> This was met with incredulity. "They adopted her when she was a
> baby," said Law Chi-kwong, a professor at the department of social
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> ------------ --------
This has to be one of the weirdest disruption stories I've seen. The
kid was adopted at *4 months*. She's now 7 years old.
She's being raised in a Dutch family, with a somewhat older brother.
And she speaks Cantonese and English and "some Dutch" ?
Who's been raising this kid? Or don't they speak Dutch at home?
What is going on here?
John - 16 Dec 2007 07:44 GMT
>> This was met with incredulity. "They adopted her when she was a
>> baby," said Law Chi-kwong, a professor at the department of social
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> What is going on here?
I don't know--beats me. It makes no sense at all.
This story has stimulated a number of different thoughts for me over the
course of the day. The penulitmate one (before this post) was, "Well, if
the child is better off without them, then maybe it is a good thing for
her."
But then the next one was, "So what? Does that mean they (the adoptive
parents) get to get off the hook?"
I don't think so, but I haven't quite been able to wrap myself around the
theory of why.
The relationships among Jade, the Dutch family, and whatever State
authorities had jurisdiction over this adoption are essentially contractual
ones. Well, let me take that back--the relationships can be thought of as
contractual ones. (Let me leave the birth parents out of this account
because of the point I want to get to.)
The Dutch family promised to provide a home for this child. In reliance on
that promise, and acting on behalf of the child, the State authorities said,
"Okay--here's the deal: You provide for this child, you give her a home
with all that that means, and you get to take her home with you to enjoy as
your child."
At least, I think the deal goes something like that.
Suppose that a child and an adoptive family like this work themselves into a
bad place? Is it forbidden for the adoptive family to give the child back
as was done here? Essentially, to breach the contract?
I can certainly think of reasons for why law should forbid it. But let's
say that it is permissible, as it apparently is in Hong Kong. And that it
might even be in the interest of the child for a separation to occur.
Does the adoptive family get to breach the contract with impunity?
I don't think so. This girl has suffered irreparable damage. She has
invested seven years with that family that she will never get back. Is she
going to find a home anywhere else? What are the odds of a rejected 7 year
old finding a home versus those of a 4 month old? On the premise that the
State was acting for her, I think it can be said that she herself relied on
the promise made by the Dutch family that they would give her a home for
life. It was reasonable for her to rely on that promise, the Dutch family
expected her to rely upon that promise, and in doing so, she gave up
whatever other opportunities she may have had for a life with a family.
Pulling the rug out from under her now causes her huge damages. I would
think that they are in the millions of dollars at the least.
I dunno. This just strikes me as something that should not be costless to
the Dutch family. Can they give up on this child, and say, we just can't
deal with her? Well, okay--let's suppose they can. But if so, let them
suffer for their "mistake." They have certainly made this child suffer.
(the)duckster - 17 Dec 2007 16:23 GMT
Speaks "some Dutch"? Not culturally acclimated? WTF? Did they keep this
child in a box in the garage?
Prosecuted for abandonment and stripped of his diplomatic title and position
is a small start.
Gives us all a bad name.
(the)duckster