Family Forum / Parenting / Adoption / April 2008

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/04/13/nadopt113.xml

Cash prize for council that hit adoption targets
By Ben Leapman, Home Affairs Correspondent
Last Updated: 1:00am BST 13/04/2008

A council has admitted receiving Government money under a
controversial "adoption target" scheme that rewards the removal of
children from their parents.

Hammersmith and Fulham council, in west London, was paid £500,000 as a
reward for placing more than 100 children for adoption in three years.
The council is the first to acknowledge publicly a payout under the
target scheme. It said that its social workers had "pulled out all the
stops" and "cut down on the amount of bureaucracy" to boost the
numbers.

They exceeded their goal of 101 adoptions, securing 106 by this
month's deadline. In almost every case, the birth parents fought to
keep their children but were defeated in the family courts.

A spokesman for the Tory-controlled council said: "Nearly all of these
children were adopted compulsorily through the courts. In each of
these cases the courts decided that adoption was the right thing for
the child."

The councillor in charge of the campaign, Antony Lillis, said that the
children had had the "least promising" start in life, and were more
likely to "go on to achieve economic well-being" with their new
adoptive parents.

Campaigners said that some babies might have been taken unnecessarily
from birth parents of limited means. John Hemming, the Liberal
Democrat MP and chairman of Justice for Families, said: "I am
concerned that Hammersmith and Fulham may have removed children to hit
its target."

The council announced its success in a press release headed "Adoption
target met". Its disclosure appeared to contradict the claims of Kevin
Brennan, the children's minister, who seemed to deny the existence of
adoption targets when he said earlier this year: "The only national
adoption targets, which ended in 2006, were on the number of adoptions
of children who were already in care and waiting to be placed for
adoption, and on the speeding up of this. There was never a financial
incentive for local authorities to meet these national targets."

Mr Hemming said: "These comments by Hammersmith and Fulham blow the
Government's claims out of the water. The Government said there were
no numerical targets, but this council says there were. The Government
said nobody would be rewarded for hitting the targets, but this
council says it has been."

The first nationwide adoption targets were set in 2000, with the aim
of cutting the time that children spent in foster care or children's
homes - which are unsettling for children and expensive for taxpayers
- before being found permanent homes.

However, critics claim that targets for councils, backed by cash
rewards that have totalled at least £36?million, give social workers a
perverse incentive to remove more babies from their parents, rather
than find homes for older children already in their care. The
Government responded by scrapping the targets from this month, so the
payout to Hammersmith and Fulham will be one of the last.

The Sunday Telegraph, in its "Stop the Secrecy" campaign, has reported
cases where babies have been removed from their devastated parents at
birth, following family court sessions held in private with the threat
of prison for families who speak out. Campaigners claim to have
identified more than 100 possible miscarriages of justice.

Sometimes pregnant women are identified for forced adoption because
they are drug addicts or have neglected previous children. In other
cases, social workers cite mental health problems in the woman's past,
or concerns about their likely skill as a parent. Babies removed at
birth tend to spend a year or two in foster care before adoption,
which is permanent and irreversible.

The number of newborn children taken into care has almost trebled in a
decade, reaching 1,400 in 2005/6, A Hammer smith and Fulham spokesman
said of the 101 target: " At the time, the council felt that the bar
was set too high, as in the previous three-year period only 71
children had been adopted.

"H&F's adoption team swung into action and pulled out all the stops in
order to meet the target. In part, this was made possible by the
adoption team linking up with the council's legal department and
cutting down on the amount of bureaucracy that prospective adopters
had to deal with."

Mr Lillis said: "There is absolutely no relationship whatsoever
between Government targets and the removal of children, and it is
impossible for this or any other local authority to inappropriately
have children adopted to meet targets."