Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Adoption / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Court cancels license of New Delhi orphanage

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
kippaherring@hotmail.com - 30 Jul 2008 16:12 GMT
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/Delhi/Court_cancels_orphanage_licence/
articleshow/3299576.cms


Court cancels orphanage license
29 Jul 2008,

NEW DELHI: The license of an orphanage, Bal Vihar, in Uttam Nagar,
which was not recognised by the Child Welfare Committee (CWC), was
cancelled on Monday by the guardianship judge at Tis Hazari Court and
an inquiry into the discrepancy of their records was ordered.

According to an inspection report, submitted by the CWC about this
orphanage, at least 13 children out of the 90 names entered were
reportedly missing in July. When asked about this discrepancy, the
Sadhu Sunder Singh welfare trust, which runs this orphanage, replied
that the children had gone for a vacation to “their relatives'
house”.

“I would want to know that if these children had relatives, why were
they kept in an orphanage. Is this a hostel?” said D D Singhla, an
advocate at Tis Hazari court. All the children were sent under the
protection of CWC.

Singhla had been fighting a case for custody of a four-year-old boy,
Prateek, who went missing four years ago, to be restored to his
natural parents. However, Prateek had been taken to Bal Vihar back
then by the police (without being produced in front of a magistrate
and to an orphanage not recognised by the CWC) and was fraudulently
adopted, within 10 days of him going missing, by Anil Jindal in Uttam
Nagar.

“The adoption deed had empty columns, no permission from any
magistrate, as is mandatory under Juvenile Justice (Care and
Protection) Act, 2000, was sought and there was no notice by the
police. We challenged the adoption and now Prateek's parents, Dinesh
and Babita Sharma, have been granted his custody,” said Singhla.

Judge Surendra S Rathi also initiated an inquiry against the police.
In the case of Bal Vihar, the welfare society running it is registered
under the Society's Act and cannot open up any branch or act as an
adoption agency.
rkbose@pacific.net.sg - 01 Aug 2008 00:03 GMT
On Jul 30, 8:12 am, kippaherr...@hotmail.com wrote:
> http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/Delhi/Court_cancels_orphana...
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> under the Society's Act and cannot open up any branch or act as an
> adoption agency.

About time, too.

It may be an illusion, but it really feels that India's new prosperity
is attracting all kinds of sleazy money-making rackets at the expense
of people who are relatively helpless. Adoption's one - and one which
maybe a decade or two ago wouldn't have been fertile ground but is
now. This is one reason foreign adoptions from India are heavily
regulated. I used to think too much so, but am not sure now. I think
they do need strict regulation, but probably more sensible regulation
would be the answer.

Another recent racket is stealing body-parts - specifically kidneys; a
doctor based in Canada and operating out of Delhi was arrested earlier
this year. It's getting to a point where the over-the-top rumors about
kids being stolen for body-parts gain credibility.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.