 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Family Forum / Parenting / Adoption / August 2008Helloo
Been having a spot of computer bother, just wanted to check that I can post successfully Robin (A right bastard from the UK) * >Been having a spot of computer bother, just wanted to check that I can post >successfully > >Robin >(A right bastard from the UK) Yup, coming in loud and clear Robin. Julia On 16/8/08 13:45, in article 48a6cbbd.102684187@news.iinet.net.au, "Julia Rollings" <jurol@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Been having a spot of computer bother, just wanted to check that I can post >> successfully [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Julia Thanks Julia and Kippa Looks like it's got a lot more interesting since I was last here I'll have to stick around and catch up Robin (According to some, the biggest bastard in the UK) * On Aug 17, 3:41 am, Robin Harritt <upyo...@spammers.no.thanks.ug> wrote: > Robin > (According to some, > the biggest bastard > in the UK) You're always pissing somebody off, Robin. Dad > On Aug 17, 3:41�am, Robin Harritt <upyo...@spammers.no.thanks.ug> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Dad Just like Dad. J. On 18/8/08 15:25, in article cf5dfefa-2d1c-465f-b68e-1b106fc0c84a@79g2000hsk.googlegroups.com, "J." <jmdjmh@aol.com> wrote: >> On Aug 17, 3:41�am, Robin Harritt <upyo...@spammers.no.thanks.ug> >> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > J. I take it as a personal duty to piss off those on all sides of adoption who can not see the bigger picture, as I'm sure does Dad and all the old timers here. That's why I keep coming back, cut through the crap and it's still the best adoption forum on the internet. No one owns it, no one controls it, I wish more people would find it f.ck MSN, f.ck Yahoo and especially f.ck Adoption.com I just wish Google hadn't hijacked Usenet and made it so difficult to find a reliable free NNTP server My reputation spreads, http://groups.msn.com/ForgottenMothers-/dianvapologist.msnw Just a shame they can't show both sides of the argument in the material they nicked from here and include my full name a few more times Robin (non-apologist for bastards everywhere and proud of it, no apologies need) http://harritt.eu * On Aug 21, 6:37 am, Robin Harritt <upyo...@spammers.no.thanks.ug> wrote: > My reputation spreads,http://groups.msn.com/ForgottenMothers-/dianvapologist.msnw > Just a shame they can't show both sides of the argument in the material they > nicked from here Oh wow.' Infamy! Infamy! They've all got it infamy!' (I mean for you ;-) Ah well. Given they're unable to recognize even the remotest possibility that there might conceivably be any side other than their own, I guess it's not surprising. Nuts. From the link you supplied: "He claims that the state benefits available to unmarried mothers were insufficient to survive on with a baby. Yet, widowed mothers received the same state benefits and there are no reports that they placed their children for adoption." From this article (great site, by the way) http://www.historyandpolicy.org/papers/policy-paper-48.html "The post-war welfare state has always dealt with widows and divorced or separated women more sympathetically than unmarried mothers, though they shared many of the same characteristics of poverty. Widows remained eligible for pensions and supplementary assistance from the Poor Law and after 1948 from National Assistance, while other lone mothers remained dependent on National Assistance, later Supplementary Benefit, or charity if they received no maintenance." On 21/8/08 18:41, in article f19ceb60-5ac8-4fe5-bac6-4c6ea0de394c@v57g2000hse.googlegroups.com, > From the link you supplied: > "He claims that the state benefits available to unmarried mothers were [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > mothers remained dependent on National Assistance, later Supplementary > Benefit, or charity if they received no maintenance." Thanks Kippa, I've popped that on the blog http://adoptionopenrecord.blogspot.com/ I'm awaiting a reaction from Patricia Basquill, 'Trackers International' and 'Forgotten Mothers' Affiliated with Origins Inc., Origins Canada and Origins USA so they claim http://www.uktrackers.co.uk/ti_int.htm Not a good advertisement for Origins I would have thought Robin Harritt http://harritt.eu * On Aug 16, 4:18 am, Robin Harritt <upyo...@spammers.no.thanks.ug> wrote: > Been having a spot of computer bother, just wanted to check that I can post > successfully [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > * Yo Robin :-) |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2010 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.