Haunted by a pregnancy in the past
|
|
Thread rating:  |
kippaherring@hotmail.com - 16 Sep 2008 12:42 GMT http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/features/2008/0909/1220629647656.html
Haunted by a pregnancy in the past KATE HOLMQUIST Tues, Sept 09, 2008
GIVE ME A BREAK: Having given birth in secret as an 'unmarried mother', a friend now wants to meet her child. But could her husband and other children cope with the revelation?
I KNEW MY friend for many years before she shared with me the secret turmoil that has dominated her inner life - a secret that has come between herself and her children, between herself and her husband and between herself and her parents - a Berlin Wall of emotion that no one in the family, including herself, has ever dared breech, so that her family have never really known her.
As a young, single woman, she became pregnant. Brainwashed by the Catholic Church into feeling overwhelming shame and guilt, she travelled alone to England, where she gave birth to a son and put him up for adoption. It was her only option. A few years later, she saw a picture of him and his adoptive parents in a magazine. Since then, she knows nothing of his life. He'd be in his 30s now. Is he happy? Married? Has he children of his own? Has my friend grandchildren she may never know? She has registered with the agencies that enable birth mothers and adopted children to trace one another, but there has been no news so far.
My friend told me and a couple of other women her secret, even though her own children, now adults, still have no idea. In the beginning, when she met and married her husband, she believed the advice she'd been given: give up your baby, tell no one and forget it ever happened. She did tell her husband before they married, but after that initial confession, they never discussed it again, despite decades of supposedly intimate marriage.
While her children were young and living at home, she was so busy and preoccupied with bringing them up that she was able to suppress her secret. But now she's in her 60s with an empty nest, she is assessing her life and the pain of losing her first-born has surged back with renewed force. More than 30 years have passed, yet emotionally it's as though the trauma happened yesterday. And the overwhelming feeling for her at the moment seems to be anger.
Anger at the Catholic Church, anger at her parents for knowing what was going on yet never acknowledging it, anger at society in general for also sweeping this issue under the carpet. As we all know, anger is a necessary stage in grief, so she needs to feel it, but listening to her it's clear that her anger is also turned in on herself for having conformed to the morality of her time. The lie she was told - that she could carry a baby for nine months then give it up for adoption and get on with her life without massive psychological scarring - has turned out to be not just a lie, but a form of emotional abuse. Her unprocessed pain has multiplied tenfold as a result of being suppressed due to the secrecy.
There are tens of thousands of women in my friend's situation. Since 1952, Ireland has seen 42,000 domestic adoptions - most of them in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s. Not all birth mothers feel as she does, but many do.
Apart from her anger at the Catholic values of shame that forced her to give up her son, my friend also feels fear. If her adult children were to discover her secret, would they condemn her for having lied to them? As a mother who tried to instil good values in her children, would they see her as a hypocrite? Would they believe that their mother's ability to surrender a child in order to keep her good name means that she loves them less than they thought? Does it make her unmotherly?
She also fears talking to her husband about her feelings. They've been together so long that she wonders if their relationship could sustain the explosion of feeling that would take place were she to be honest with him about her pain. This is a woman who has kept the lid on her pain for so long that lifting it for anyone but her therapist and her closest confidantes is terrifying.
And while she may disagree with me, I think she also feels a sense of being out of sync with society as it is today. When Sarah Palin can celebrate her teenage daughters pregnancy and still run for US vice- president, and when Irish parents whose teens and university-age children become pregnant can be open and find ways to rear the new child - their grandchild - it hurts all the more for women like my friend. She is living in a liberal society, yet in her mind and heart she still has to live with the consequences of a 1970s mind-set when so-called "unmarried mothers" and "illegitimate children" were frowned upon.This makes her a stranger in a strange land - surrounded by liberal attitudes, yet living with fear and anger that make her afraid to make the most of the new openness by telling her own story.
She would like to see women of her age - women now in their 60s to 80s - sharing their stories and going public with their legacies of pain. Partly because she would like the support of hearing how others coped, but also because she would like see the terrible secret she has carried put on the record for today's generation of ethically privileged young people who have no idea of the repression their parents and grandparents suffered.
kippaherring@hotmail.com - 16 Sep 2008 12:51 GMT http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/features/2008/0916/1221430249379.html
Stories of adoption that need to be heard 'Giving up a child for adoption has a lifetime impact' KATE HOLMQUIST Tues, Sept16, 2008
GIVE ME A BREAK: THIS WEEK, I'm handing the column over to the readers. Some of you - birth mothers who were happy with their decision and adoptive parents grateful for the gift of an adopted family - want me to point out that there were a few words left out of my column about adoption last week, such as relief, forgiveness, reunion and joy. Others have e-mailed me with stories that make last week's harrowing column seem pale.
I wrote about my friend, who gave up a baby for adoption 30 years ago. She subsequently married, having told her husband about her first child, and gave birth to several more children. To this day, none of the children know their mother's secret. She's afraid to tell them.
My friend feels betrayed by a Church and a society that told her to forget her firstborn and begin her life anew. She went on to have a relatively privileged married and family life. But recently - as her socially recognised children have left the nest - she has been thinking more about the child she had to give away. The wound of adoption has reopened for her.
She is angry that the Catholic Church shamed her and that society and her own parents turned a blind eye to her going on a boat alone to England to give birth and surrender the baby. This secrecy still affects her because she is afraid to talk about adoption, even with her husband. And yet today's "liberal" society tells her that candour and openness are good things and that having a baby outside marriage isn't sinful. She wishes she could benefit from this openness, but in her heart she remains trapped in the repression of old Ireland.
Her aim in speaking to me was to highlight that fact that there are adult adoptees and ageing birth mothers all around us, coping with the consequences of a time when adoption or abortion were the only choices.
Readers responded immediately to my friend's story, some saying that her story is their story. Their willingness to share their pain is a sign of progress, because 15 years ago, when I last visited this issue as a journalist, it was extremely difficult to get even one or two people affected by adoption to speak, even anonymously, such was the shame and guilt.
This time around I heard from birth mothers who had been reunited with their children and had found happy endings. I also heard from adoptive parents who wished that my friend and I had left well enough alone and not raised the issue at all.
That's understandable, but there remain family members of all ages and social groups who are still being affected by the legacy of adoption. What must it be like, as one reader confided, to discover by accident that your mother gave away a child before she married and had you, your brothers and sisters? What do you do when you are in the extraordinary situation of knowing your mother's secret, yet your mother doesn't know that you know?
There are so many secrets in families today as a consequence of adoption. The 42,000 women who had their babies adopted in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s are living with the consequences, and so are their families.
On this page today, we're publishing just a few of those stories. The writers believe that sharing their experiences may help others going through the journey of coming to terms with adoption - a journey that can take a lifetime.
Meanwhile, my friend says dealing with the issue has made her a stronger person. "I'd urge those in my situation to seek support. You can't do it on your own."
kippaherring@hotmail.com - 16 Sep 2008 13:01 GMT http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/features/2008/0916/1221430249383.html
'Giving up a child for adoption has a lifetime impact' Stories of adoption that need to be heard
A woman relieved to discover her son had turned out well after adoption: "In the late 1970s I had a child who was adopted - at a time when 30 per cent of Irish children born outside marriage were adopted.
"While my experience of pregnancy and placement was much less traumatic than your friend's, the fact that I had a child who was adopted was difficult to discuss with people until comparatively recently. I always wondered about how my child was progressing and what was happening to him, and knew very little until I contacted the relevant adoption society after my child had reached the age of 21. It provided me with non-identifying information and told the adoptive family that I had been in contact. The mother sent me some photographs, which were terrific. Since then I have had the opportunity to see for myself that my son is a lovely lad and turned out very well.
"Giving up a child for adoption has a lifetime impact. One of the things which I've found helpful to remember is that what we did was the most generous act anyone could undertake. Some adoptive families always toast their child's mother at Christmas and birthdays as a gesture of appreciation and recognition.
"Should your friend decide to discuss the adoption now with her adult children and husband, I'm sure that they will fully appreciate how radically things have changed in Ireland over the last 30 to 40 years and that she took a very brave and loving decision, which was in the best interest of her child in the prevailing circumstance. Of course what she did does not make her unmotherly! Your friend's adult children will know what a loving mother she has been to them for many years."
"My child's father didn't want to know and still doesn't - I see him in the supermarket"
A woman who gave up her son 30 years ago : "I had to keep my first pregnancy secret because my father was a very important person in the community and my child's father was the son of my father's best friend. To this day, neither of these men know that they became grandfathers when my first child was born.
"My child's father didn't want to know and still doesn't - I often see him in the supermarket on Saturday mornings, and he walks right by me. . . I think that men who get women pregnant, then deny it and walk away, should have a permanent tattoo on their foreheads that says: 'I fertilised an egg and I didn't take responsibility!'
"I'm not angry and bitter. You have to see the positives of adoption for women of my generation and not get into Irish martyrdom. Adoption was the answer to a problem at the time. I was 19 years old and I stayed in hospital, breastfeeding my baby for a week until the social worker took my child, put it in a Moses basket on the back seat of her car and drove off. I went home alone to my apartment in London and breathed a sigh of relief. There was no way a single mother could survive then with a small baby and still hold down a job. Adoption was a solution. Nobody died. It wasn't an abortion - the child lived. I didn't bond with the child I gave away as I did with my other children.
"It would be far worse to bond with a child only to see that child die.
"Some birth mothers take the view of 'my life has been so awful'. My view is: 'That's not what ruined your life.' Maybe you married the wrong man afterwards or had other difficulties, but having given away your baby isn't the reason you are unhappy now. Everybody gets a blow, a wake-up call that makes them move from childhood to adulthood. Everybody has an experience that forces them to become adults, and you can't blame that experience for all your problems. You have to move on.
"I'm afraid that birth mothers speaking about their pain would put off young girls today from seeing adoption as a viable choice. There are so many couples who can't have children, and I would love to see adoption coming back in again. Abortion can be hard to live with and women should have the choice to continue their pregnancies and have their babies adopted if that is what's right for them.
"I would love to be a surrogate mother, having children for people who can't have them, if I was still able - why is that any different than giving your child up for adoption? I think it was the secrecy and shame that caused us so much pain. A friend of mine was at a wedding recently - a table of eight, four couples all in their 50s - and one of the women got very drunk and said out of the blue: 'Before I was married I had a baby and gave it away, and I don't give a damn what any of you think!' Then two of the other women admitted that they too had got pregnant and given babies away before they got married. Imagine! Three out of four women at a table at a wedding had had that experience. That was our generation in the 1970s.
"My firstborn has never come looking for me. I think that means he's happy. I would never go looking for him, because you just have to leave well enough alone.
"If there was anyone I'd like to meet, it would be the mother of the other child that the couple who adopted my child also adopted. I was told that she looked like me and was similar in social background and personality. The social workers were very good at that - matching us birth mothers with adoptive parents in terms of looks and personality so that the children to be adopted would fit right in.
"A few years ago, I told my grown children that I had given birth to a child and had the child adopted. One reason I told them was so that one of my daughters wouldn't start dating her half-brother by mistake.
"For me, there was a sense of freedom. It's not as bad as telling your children you have a terminal disease - and if my children can't accept it, then too bad."
"Even though I have her number, I dare not telephone my birth mother"
A man adopted 40 years ago, who feels shunned by his birth family : "I am an adopted person who has successfully made contact with his birth mother but still finds himself in a limbo of secrecy. I was born and adopted in 1956. Through the adoption society I contacted my mother in 2003 and we had one meeting in 2005, but since then there have been only three phone calls, all motivated by her need to defend her position of absolute secrecy.
"From our meeting in 2005, I got enough information to trace back into the ancestry of both my parents, and I am very glad to have had that opportunity. But now I have exhausted the genealogical escape lines. After many hours spent in libraries, archives, presbyteries, graveyards, etc, I have collected a folder of documents recording the facts of my ancestors' lives, but I have no real access to my living relatives. Even though I know where my mother lives, I may not visit her. Even though I have her number, I dare not telephone her. This is because she has never told her husband or her family. I am her secret. I do not want to be, but I am.
"I have nothing to hide. I would be more than happy to be able to announce to the world: 'I am this woman's son; this man was my father.' But I cannot do so. For my mother's sake, I must remain silent, invisible, non-existent.
"I am in many ways free, independent, comfortable, even privileged. But because I continue to be my mother's secret, my sense of identity remains muted. Some part of me - the essence or core that non-adopted people may take for granted - is always suppressed.
"I have three grown-up children, each older than my mother was when she found herself pregnant and fled to England to deal with her crisis. Now I am the father of a five-year-old girl for whom this grandmother just does not exist. I don't see that I have any choice but to keep this information from my daughter, but it means that the charade of secrecy continues . . . I am not just the object of secrecy, but a participant in the process. Not only must I carry with me someone's secret, I am that secret incarnate.
"What am I to do if my mother dies? Am I to appear after a decent interval of mourning and reveal myself to her family? How would they feel? Wouldn't it be better if she could bring herself to tell them herself? Sometimes I think that people imagine that we live in enlightened times - not so for people embroiled in the absurd secrecy cycle of adoption. On one occasion, my mother spotted me in the supermarket and she swung her trolley round and resurfaced at the farthest corner of the shop.
"I very much support what your friend suggests, a forum for birth mothers aged 60-plus to share their stories and support each other. Life is too short to be taking all this to the grave."
"I used to hear women screaming . . . Was the same thing to happen to me?"
A woman forced into adoption 40 years ago : "As a 16-year-old, I was one of these girls in the 1960s. I was sent to what I thought was a boarding school, with absolutely no idea that anything was wrong with me. I was so naive that when I started to put on weight I believed what I was told there, that I was eating too much. I used to hear women screaming in the night, and the following morning these women had been moved to another part of the building. What was I to think but that they were doing something to them and they had disappeared? Was the same thing to happen to me? There was no sign of babies to give a hint, as the mothers were moved to another part of the building with their babies and never the two would meet.
"Anyway, my turn came, and the screaming was in fact the birth of babies, and now I discovered that this was the problem. My baby daughter was born and died after a week or two. This death was not once addressed with me, nor was there a funeral either.
"After I returned home - no baby, no death, nothing. My way of coping was to push it away and get on with my life. However, this proved to be impossible as I was constantly depressed and showing signs of several illnesses for years. In the past 15 years I have been dealing with this in therapy and have been reliving and releasing the pain and suffering.
"Worse still, when I went about looking for records of my baby and proof of my time there, I was about to be further pained to discover that there was no record of me being there and no record of my ever having had a baby. Can you imagine what this has done to me? I have suffered many things but I can tell you that no pain compares to the pain of a mother being separated from her child. This is the ultimate. Nothing compares.
"The only proof I have that I was there is that one of the girls died suddenly when I was there. She died of a blood-clot or something similar. We were very aware of this and I can still see the hearse driving down the avenue bringing her home to be buried. This is all I have. The biggest part of all this is the denial and secrecy around it. Secrets kill us, and mine gave me breast cancer eight years ago, but thankfully I am still here to tell the tale.
"Your friend and her baby - I would like you to tell her that her children would probably be her best support in this. Times have changed and her children would be appalled at what she has carried. I'm sure that her husband would be too."
"I am now in my 40s, but I don't think it goes away until it is dealt with"
A woman who finds secrecy the most difficult aspect of being adopted : "I am the child of an unmarried mother, and a father who was married to somebody else. I don't like to go into detail in an e-mail, but, in short, a very complicated route was taken to keep my parentage a secret and make it appear that I was the child of a married couple.
"I feel, however, that I carried a lot of the surrounding guilt and shame. The most difficult part was the secrecy and, as you say in your article, being out of sync with the changing times now. When I try to articulate and talk about the experience it seems a bit ridiculous to be dwelling on it, as I am now in my 40s, but I don't think it goes away until it is dealt with. I agree with your point that we need to remember and explain to younger generations. There are reasons why I am the way I am, why society is the way it is, and things that need to be explained, opened up, accepted and forgiven."
kat - 16 Sep 2008 14:18 GMT > http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/features/2008/0916/1221430249383.html > [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > > "I'm not angry and bitter. Um I think her statement directly above that contradicts her assessment of her state of mind :)
You have to see the positives of adoption
> for women of my generation and not get into Irish martyrdom. Adoption > was the answer to a problem at the time. I was 19 years old and I [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > wrong man afterwards or had other difficulties, but having given away > your baby isn't the reason you are unhappy now. Nice. I love it when people tell other people what it is they are thinking/feeling.
Everybody gets a blow,
> a wake-up call that makes them move from childhood to adulthood. > Everybody has an experience that forces them to become adults, and you > can't blame that experience for all your problems. You have to move > on. It really irritates me when people turn around and do the same thing to others that has been done to them and can't see the hypocrisy! Does "forget about this baby and move on with your lif"' ring a bell for her at all? Yes people have to 'move on' but dismissing the cause of their pain, not allowing them to process that pain and simply telling them to basically "get over it and move on'" is *not* helpful 'advice'.
> "I'm afraid that birth mothers speaking about their pain would put off > young girls today from seeing adoption as a viable choice. There are > so many couples who can't have children, and I would love to see > adoption coming back in again. Abortion can be hard to live with and > women should have the choice to continue their pregnancies and have > their babies adopted if that is what's right for them. What? Is somebody advocating that that choice be removed? Or is she just afraid that the reality of adoption (which btw can be just as "hard to live with" as abortion) will upset her pro-life plan for society?
> "I would love to be a surrogate mother, having children for people who > can't have them, if I was still able - why is that any different than > giving your child up for adoption? Yikes. She really drank the koolaid. She really can't see the difference??
I think it was the secrecy and
> shame that caused us so much pain. A friend of mine was at a wedding > recently - a table of eight, four couples all in their 50s - and one [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > "My firstborn has never come looking for me. I think that means he's > happy. It is obvious this woman deals in sterotypes.
I would never go looking for him, because you just have to
> leave well enough alone. > [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > crisis. Now I am the father of a five-year-old girl for whom this > grandmother just does not exist. I don't see that I have any choice He might not recognize it but he *does* have a choice.
> but to keep this information from my daughter, but it means that the > charade of secrecy continues . . . I am not just the object of [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > mothers aged 60-plus to share their stories and support each other. > Life is too short to be taking all this to the grave." Or beyond. When my bfather died my one bsister sent me the funeral card/obituary. What a surprise - I wasn't mentioned lol. This was a man who contacted me but did not want his grandchildren to know who I was so my one bsister told her children I was a friend of hers when we met. He also went out of his way (literally) to meet me in my hometown yet never acknowledged the flowers I sent when he was ill in the hospital. I wonder if people asked him who the flowers were from and what he said ;) Maybe he just had them removed. Secrecy does strange things to people.
> "I used to hear women screaming . . . Was the same thing to happen to > me?" [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > have. The biggest part of all this is the denial and secrecy around > it. Secrets kill us, and mine gave me breast cancer eight years ago, Okay dokey. If this is what she really believes it kind of calls into question the rest of her story.
> but thankfully I am still here to tell the tale. > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > am the way I am, why society is the way it is, and things that need to > be explained, opened up, accepted and forgiven." Yep.
Kathy 1
kippaherring@hotmail.com - 16 Sep 2008 15:16 GMT > <kippaherr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > Um I think her statement directly above that contradicts her assessment of > her state of mind :) Indeed.
> > You have to see the positives of adoption > > for women of my generation and not get into Irish martyrdom. Adoption [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > Nice. I love it when people tell other people what it is they are > thinking/feeling. Me too. Especially when they put it in the imperative form. Like, "You HAVE TO see the positives of adoption."
> > Everybody gets a blow, > > a wake-up call that makes them move from childhood to adulthood. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > allowing them to process that pain and simply telling them to basically "get > over it and move on'" is *not* helpful 'advice'. Yup. And there's that "HAVE TO" again. It must be implanted deep in her brain.
> > "I'm afraid that birth mothers speaking about their pain would put off > > young girls today from seeing adoption as a viable choice. There are [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > afraid that the reality of adoption (which btw can be just as "hard to live > with" as abortion) will upset her pro-life plan for society? She talks like a shill.
> > "I would love to be a surrogate mother, having children for people who > > can't have them, if I was still able - why is that any different than > > giving your child up for adoption? > > Yikes. She really drank the koolaid. She really can't see the difference?? I know. It's almost unbelievable that she doesn't! Either that - or else she's really, really, REALLY stoopid.
> > I think it was the secrecy and > > shame that caused us so much pain. A friend of mine was at a wedding [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > It is obvious this woman deals in stereotypes. as well as clichés, platitudes and all that chickenshit.
> > I would never go looking for him, because you just have to leave well enough alone. Yet another "HAVE TO". Who said? Who told her that?
> > "If there was anyone I'd like to meet, it would be the mother of the > > other child that the couple who adopted my child also adopted. I was [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > children you have a terminal disease - and if my children can't accept > > it, then too bad."
> > "Even though I have her number, I dare not telephone my birth mother" > [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > He might not recognize it but he *does* have a choice. Nor does he realize that by "choosing" to believe he doesn't have a choice he's actually making one.
> > but to keep this information from my daughter, but it means that the
> > charade of secrecy continues . . . I am not just the object of > > secrecy, but a participant in the process. Not only must I carry with [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > read more »
|
|
|