Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Adoption / September 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Haunted by a pregnancy in the past

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
kippaherring@hotmail.com - 16 Sep 2008 12:42 GMT
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/features/2008/0909/1220629647656.html

Haunted by a pregnancy in the past
KATE HOLMQUIST
Tues, Sept 09, 2008

GIVE ME A BREAK: Having given birth in secret as an 'unmarried
mother', a friend now wants to meet her child. But could her husband
and other children cope with the revelation?

I KNEW MY friend for many years before she shared with me the secret
turmoil that has dominated her inner life - a secret that has come
between herself and her children, between herself and her husband and
between herself and her parents - a Berlin Wall of emotion that no one
in the family, including herself, has ever dared breech, so that her
family have never really known her.

As a young, single woman, she became pregnant. Brainwashed by the
Catholic Church into feeling overwhelming shame and guilt, she
travelled alone to England, where she gave birth to a son and put him
up for adoption. It was her only option. A few years later, she saw a
picture of him and his adoptive parents in a magazine. Since then, she
knows nothing of his life. He'd be in his 30s now. Is he happy?
Married? Has he children of his own? Has my friend grandchildren she
may never know? She has registered with the agencies that enable birth
mothers and adopted children to trace one another, but there has been
no news so far.

My friend told me and a couple of other women her secret, even though
her own children, now adults, still have no idea. In the beginning,
when she met and married her husband, she believed the advice she'd
been given: give up your baby, tell no one and forget it ever
happened. She did tell her husband before they married, but after that
initial confession, they never discussed it again, despite decades of
supposedly intimate marriage.

While her children were young and living at home, she was so busy and
preoccupied with bringing them up that she was able to suppress her
secret. But now she's in her 60s with an empty nest, she is assessing
her life and the pain of losing her first-born has surged back with
renewed force. More than 30 years have passed, yet emotionally it's as
though the trauma happened yesterday. And the overwhelming feeling for
her at the moment seems to be anger.

Anger at the Catholic Church, anger at her parents for knowing what
was going on yet never acknowledging it, anger at society in general
for also sweeping this issue under the carpet. As we all know, anger
is a necessary stage in grief, so she needs to feel it, but listening
to her it's clear that her anger is also turned in on herself for
having conformed to the morality of her time. The lie she was told -
that she could carry a baby for nine months then give it up for
adoption and get on with her life without massive psychological
scarring - has turned out to be not just a lie, but a form of
emotional abuse. Her unprocessed pain has multiplied tenfold as a
result of being suppressed due to the secrecy.

There are tens of thousands of women in my friend's situation. Since
1952, Ireland has seen 42,000 domestic adoptions - most of them in the
1950s, 1960s and 1970s. Not all birth mothers feel as she does, but
many do.

Apart from her anger at the Catholic values of shame that forced her
to give up her son, my friend also feels fear. If her adult children
were to discover her secret, would they condemn her for having lied to
them? As a mother who tried to instil good values in her children,
would they see her as a hypocrite? Would they believe that their
mother's ability to surrender a child in order to keep her good name
means that she loves them less than they thought? Does it make her
unmotherly?

She also fears talking to her husband about her feelings. They've been
together so long that she wonders if their relationship could sustain
the explosion of feeling that would take place were she to be honest
with him about her pain. This is a woman who has kept the lid on her
pain for so long that lifting it for anyone but her therapist and her
closest confidantes is terrifying.

And while she may disagree with me, I think she also feels a sense of
being out of sync with society as it is today. When Sarah Palin can
celebrate her teenage daughters pregnancy and still run for US vice-
president, and when Irish parents whose teens and university-age
children become pregnant can be open and find ways to rear the new
child - their grandchild - it hurts all the more for women like my
friend. She is living in a liberal society, yet in her mind and heart
she still has to live with the consequences of a 1970s mind-set when
so-called "unmarried mothers" and "illegitimate children" were frowned
upon.This makes her a stranger in a strange land - surrounded by
liberal attitudes, yet living with fear and anger that make her afraid
to make the most of the new openness by telling her own story.

She would like to see women of her age - women now in their 60s to 80s
- sharing their stories and going public with their legacies of pain.
Partly because she would like the support of hearing how others coped,
but also because she would like see the terrible secret she has
carried put on the record for today's generation of ethically
privileged young people who have no idea of the repression their
parents and grandparents suffered.
kippaherring@hotmail.com - 16 Sep 2008 12:51 GMT
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/features/2008/0916/1221430249379.html

Stories of adoption that need to be heard
'Giving up a child for adoption has a lifetime impact'
KATE HOLMQUIST
Tues, Sept16, 2008

GIVE ME A BREAK: THIS WEEK, I'm handing the column over to the
readers. Some of you - birth mothers who were happy with their
decision and adoptive parents grateful for the gift of an adopted
family - want me to point out that there were a few words left out of
my column about adoption last week, such as relief, forgiveness,
reunion and joy. Others have e-mailed me with stories that make last
week's harrowing column seem pale.

I wrote about my friend, who gave up a baby for adoption 30 years ago.
She subsequently married, having told her husband about her first
child, and gave birth to several more children. To this day, none of
the children know their mother's secret. She's afraid to tell them.

My friend feels betrayed by a Church and a society that told her to
forget her firstborn and begin her life anew. She went on to have a
relatively privileged married and family life. But recently - as her
socially recognised children have left the nest - she has been
thinking more about the child she had to give away. The wound of
adoption has reopened for her.

She is angry that the Catholic Church shamed her and that society and
her own parents turned a blind eye to her going on a boat alone to
England to give birth and surrender the baby. This secrecy still
affects her because she is afraid to talk about adoption, even with
her husband. And yet today's "liberal" society tells her that candour
and openness are good things and that having a baby outside marriage
isn't sinful. She wishes she could benefit from this openness, but in
her heart she remains trapped in the repression of old Ireland.

Her aim in speaking to me was to highlight that fact that there are
adult adoptees and ageing birth mothers all around us, coping with the
consequences of a time when adoption or abortion were the only
choices.

Readers responded immediately to my friend's story, some saying that
her story is their story. Their willingness to share their pain is a
sign of progress, because 15 years ago, when I last visited this issue
as a journalist, it was extremely difficult to get even one or two
people affected by adoption to speak, even anonymously, such was the
shame and guilt.

This time around I heard from birth mothers who had been reunited with
their children and had found happy endings. I also heard from adoptive
parents who wished that my friend and I had left well enough alone and
not raised the issue at all.

That's understandable, but there remain family members of all ages and
social groups who are still being affected by the legacy of adoption.
What must it be like, as one reader confided, to discover by accident
that your mother gave away a child before she married and had you,
your brothers and sisters? What do you do when you are in the
extraordinary situation of knowing your mother's secret, yet your
mother doesn't know that you know?

There are so many secrets in families today as a consequence of
adoption. The 42,000 women who had their babies adopted in the 1950s,
1960s and 1970s are living with the consequences, and so are their
families.

On this page today, we're publishing just a few of those stories. The
writers believe that sharing their experiences may help others going
through the journey of coming to terms with adoption - a journey that
can take a lifetime.

Meanwhile, my friend says dealing with the issue has made her a
stronger person. "I'd urge those in my situation to seek support. You
can't do it on your own."
kippaherring@hotmail.com - 16 Sep 2008 13:01 GMT
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/features/2008/0916/1221430249383.html

'Giving up a child for adoption has a lifetime impact'
Stories of adoption that need to be heard

A woman relieved to discover her son had turned out well after
adoption: "In the late 1970s I had a child who was adopted - at a time
when 30 per cent of Irish children born outside marriage were adopted.

"While my experience of pregnancy and placement was much less
traumatic than your friend's, the fact that I had a child who was
adopted was difficult to discuss with people until comparatively
recently. I always wondered about how my child was progressing and
what was happening to him, and knew very little until I contacted the
relevant adoption society after my child had reached the age of 21. It
provided me with non-identifying information and told the adoptive
family that I had been in contact. The mother sent me some
photographs, which were terrific. Since then I have had the
opportunity to see for myself that my son is a lovely lad and turned
out very well.

"Giving up a child for adoption has a lifetime impact. One of the
things which I've found helpful to remember is that what we did was
the most generous act anyone could undertake. Some adoptive families
always toast their child's mother at Christmas and birthdays as a
gesture of appreciation and recognition.

"Should your friend decide to discuss the adoption now with her adult
children and husband, I'm sure that they will fully appreciate how
radically things have changed in Ireland over the last 30 to 40 years
and that she took a very brave and loving decision, which was in the
best interest of her child in the prevailing circumstance. Of course
what she did does not make her unmotherly! Your friend's adult
children will know what a loving mother she has been to them for many
years."

"My child's father didn't want to know and still doesn't - I see him
in the supermarket"

A woman who gave up her son 30 years ago : "I had to keep my first
pregnancy secret because my father was a very important person in the
community and my child's father was the son of my father's best
friend. To this day, neither of these men know that they became
grandfathers when my first child was born.

"My child's father didn't want to know and still doesn't - I often see
him in the supermarket on Saturday mornings, and he walks right by
me. . . I think that men who get women pregnant, then deny it and walk
away, should have a permanent tattoo on their foreheads that says: 'I
fertilised an egg and I didn't take responsibility!'

"I'm not angry and bitter. You have to see the positives of adoption
for women of my generation and not get into Irish martyrdom. Adoption
was the answer to a problem at the time. I was 19 years old and I
stayed in hospital, breastfeeding my baby for a week until the social
worker took my child, put it in a Moses basket on the back seat of her
car and drove off. I went home alone to my apartment in London and
breathed a sigh of relief. There was no way a single mother could
survive then with a small baby and still hold down a job. Adoption was
a solution. Nobody died. It wasn't an abortion - the child lived. I
didn't bond with the child I gave away as I did with my other
children.

"It would be far worse to bond with a child only to see that child
die.

"Some birth mothers take the view of 'my life has been so awful'. My
view is: 'That's not what ruined your life.' Maybe you married the
wrong man afterwards or had other difficulties, but having given away
your baby isn't the reason you are unhappy now. Everybody gets a blow,
a wake-up call that makes them move from childhood to adulthood.
Everybody has an experience that forces them to become adults, and you
can't blame that experience for all your problems. You have to move
on.

"I'm afraid that birth mothers speaking about their pain would put off
young girls today from seeing adoption as a viable choice. There are
so many couples who can't have children, and I would love to see
adoption coming back in again. Abortion can be hard to live with and
women should have the choice to continue their pregnancies and have
their babies adopted if that is what's right for them.

"I would love to be a surrogate mother, having children for people who
can't have them, if I was still able - why is that any different than
giving your child up for adoption? I think it was the secrecy and
shame that caused us so much pain. A friend of mine was at a wedding
recently - a table of eight, four couples all in their 50s - and one
of the women got very drunk and said out of the blue: 'Before I was
married I had a baby and gave it away, and I don't give a damn what
any of you think!' Then two of the other women admitted that they too
had got pregnant and given babies away before they got married.
Imagine! Three out of four women at a table at a wedding had had that
experience. That was our generation in the 1970s.

"My firstborn has never come looking for me. I think that means he's
happy. I would never go looking for him, because you just have to
leave well enough alone.

"If there was anyone I'd like to meet, it would be the mother of the
other child that the couple who adopted my child also adopted. I was
told that she looked like me and was similar in social background and
personality. The social workers were very good at that - matching us
birth mothers with adoptive parents in terms of looks and personality
so that the children to be adopted would fit right in.

"A few years ago, I told my grown children that I had given birth to a
child and had the child adopted. One reason I told them was so that
one of my daughters wouldn't start dating her half-brother by mistake.

"For me, there was a sense of freedom. It's not as bad as telling your
children you have a terminal disease - and if my children can't accept
it, then too bad."

"Even though I have her number, I dare not telephone my birth mother"

A man adopted 40 years ago, who feels shunned by his birth family : "I
am an adopted person who has successfully made contact with his birth
mother but still finds himself in a limbo of secrecy. I was born and
adopted in 1956. Through the adoption society I contacted my mother in
2003 and we had one meeting in 2005, but since then there have been
only three phone calls, all motivated by her need to defend her
position of absolute secrecy.

"From our meeting in 2005, I got enough information to trace back into
the ancestry of both my parents, and I am very glad to have had that
opportunity. But now I have exhausted the genealogical escape lines.
After many hours spent in libraries, archives, presbyteries,
graveyards, etc, I have collected a folder of documents recording the
facts of my ancestors' lives, but I have no real access to my living
relatives. Even though I know where my mother lives, I may not visit
her. Even though I have her number, I dare not telephone her. This is
because she has never told her husband or her family. I am her secret.
I do not want to be, but I am.

"I have nothing to hide. I would be more than happy to be able to
announce to the world: 'I am this woman's son; this man was my
father.' But I cannot do so. For my mother's sake, I must remain
silent, invisible, non-existent.

"I am in many ways free, independent, comfortable, even privileged.
But because I continue to be my mother's secret, my sense of identity
remains muted. Some part of me - the essence or core that non-adopted
people may take for granted - is always suppressed.

"I have three grown-up children, each older than my mother was when
she found herself pregnant and fled to England to deal with her
crisis. Now I am the father of a five-year-old girl for whom this
grandmother just does not exist. I don't see that I have any choice
but to keep this information from my daughter, but it means that the
charade of secrecy continues . . . I am not just the object of
secrecy, but a participant in the process. Not only must I carry with
me someone's secret, I am that secret incarnate.

"What am I to do if my mother dies? Am I to appear after a decent
interval of mourning and reveal myself to her family? How would they
feel? Wouldn't it be better if she could bring herself to tell them
herself? Sometimes I think that people imagine that we live in
enlightened times - not so for people embroiled in the absurd secrecy
cycle of adoption. On one occasion, my mother spotted me in the
supermarket and she swung her trolley round and resurfaced at the
farthest corner of the shop.

"I very much support what your friend suggests, a forum for birth
mothers aged 60-plus to share their stories and support each other.
Life is too short to be taking all this to the grave."

"I used to hear women screaming . . . Was the same thing to happen to
me?"

A woman forced into adoption 40 years ago : "As a 16-year-old, I was
one of these girls in the 1960s. I was sent to what I thought was a
boarding school, with absolutely no idea that anything was wrong with
me. I was so naive that when I started to put on weight I believed
what I was told there, that I was eating too much. I used to hear
women screaming in the night, and the following morning these women
had been moved to another part of the building. What was I to think
but that they were doing something to them and they had disappeared?
Was the same thing to happen to me? There was no sign of babies to
give a hint, as the mothers were moved to another part of the building
with their babies and never the two would meet.

"Anyway, my turn came, and the screaming was in fact the birth of
babies, and now I discovered that this was the problem. My baby
daughter was born and died after a week or two. This death was not
once addressed with me, nor was there a funeral either.

"After I returned home - no baby, no death, nothing. My way of coping
was to push it away and get on with my life. However, this proved to
be impossible as I was constantly depressed and showing signs of
several illnesses for years. In the past 15 years I have been dealing
with this in therapy and have been reliving and releasing the pain and
suffering.

"Worse still, when I went about looking for records of my baby and
proof of my time there, I was about to be further pained to discover
that there was no record of me being there and no record of my ever
having had a baby. Can you imagine what this has done to me? I have
suffered many things but I can tell you that no pain compares to the
pain of a mother being separated from her child. This is the ultimate.
Nothing compares.

"The only proof I have that I was there is that one of the girls died
suddenly when I was there. She died of a blood-clot or something
similar. We were very aware of this and I can still see the hearse
driving down the avenue bringing her home to be buried. This is all I
have. The biggest part of all this is the denial and secrecy around
it. Secrets kill us, and mine gave me breast cancer eight years ago,
but thankfully I am still here to tell the tale.

"Your friend and her baby - I would like you to tell her that her
children would probably be her best support in this. Times have
changed and her children would be appalled at what she has carried.
I'm sure that her husband would be too."

"I am now in my 40s, but I don't think it goes away until it is dealt
with"

A woman who finds secrecy the most difficult aspect of being adopted :
"I am the child of an unmarried mother, and a father who was married
to somebody else. I don't like to go into detail in an e-mail, but, in
short, a very complicated route was taken to keep my parentage a
secret and make it appear that I was the child of a married couple.

"I feel, however, that I carried a lot of the surrounding guilt and
shame. The most difficult part was the secrecy and, as you say in your
article, being out of sync with the changing times now. When I try to
articulate and talk about the experience it seems a bit ridiculous to
be dwelling on it, as I am now in my 40s, but I don't think it goes
away until it is dealt with. I agree with your point that we need to
remember and explain to younger generations. There are reasons why I
am the way I am, why society is the way it is, and things that need to
be explained, opened up, accepted and forgiven."
kat - 16 Sep 2008 14:18 GMT
> http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/features/2008/0916/1221430249383.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>
> "I'm not angry and bitter.

Um I think her statement directly above that contradicts her assessment of
her state of mind :)

You have to see the positives of adoption
> for women of my generation and not get into Irish martyrdom. Adoption
> was the answer to a problem at the time. I was 19 years old and I
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> wrong man afterwards or had other difficulties, but having given away
> your baby isn't the reason you are unhappy now.

Nice.  I love it when people tell other people what it is they are
thinking/feeling.

Everybody gets a blow,
> a wake-up call that makes them move from childhood to adulthood.
> Everybody has an experience that forces them to become adults, and you
> can't blame that experience for all your problems. You have to move
> on.

It really irritates me when people turn around and do the same thing to
others that has been done to them and can't see the hypocrisy!  Does "forget
about this baby and move on with your lif"' ring a bell for her at all? Yes
people have to 'move on' but dismissing the cause of their pain, not
allowing them to process that pain and simply telling them to basically "get
over it and move on'" is *not* helpful  'advice'.

> "I'm afraid that birth mothers speaking about their pain would put off
> young girls today from seeing adoption as a viable choice. There are
> so many couples who can't have children, and I would love to see
> adoption coming back in again. Abortion can be hard to live with and
> women should have the choice to continue their pregnancies and have
> their babies adopted if that is what's right for them.

What?  Is somebody advocating that that choice be removed?  Or is she just
afraid that the reality of adoption (which btw can be just as "hard to live
with" as abortion) will upset her pro-life plan for society?

> "I would love to be a surrogate mother, having children for people who
> can't have them, if I was still able - why is that any different than
> giving your child up for adoption?

Yikes.  She really drank the koolaid. She really can't see the difference??

I think it was the secrecy and
> shame that caused us so much pain. A friend of mine was at a wedding
> recently - a table of eight, four couples all in their 50s - and one
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> "My firstborn has never come looking for me. I think that means he's
> happy.

It is obvious this woman deals in sterotypes.

I would never go looking for him, because you just have to
> leave well enough alone.
>
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
> crisis. Now I am the father of a five-year-old girl for whom this
> grandmother just does not exist. I don't see that I have any choice

He might not recognize it but he *does* have a choice.

> but to keep this information from my daughter, but it means that the
> charade of secrecy continues . . . I am not just the object of
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> mothers aged 60-plus to share their stories and support each other.
> Life is too short to be taking all this to the grave."

Or beyond.  When my bfather died my one bsister sent me the funeral
card/obituary.  What a surprise - I wasn't mentioned lol.  This was a man
who contacted me but did not want his grandchildren to know who I was so my
one bsister told her children I was a friend of hers when we met.  He also
went out of his way (literally) to meet me in my hometown yet never
acknowledged the flowers I sent when he was ill in the hospital.  I wonder
if people asked him who the flowers were from and what he said ;)  Maybe he
just had them removed.  Secrecy does strange things to people.

> "I used to hear women screaming . . . Was the same thing to happen to
> me?"
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> have. The biggest part of all this is the denial and secrecy around
> it. Secrets kill us, and mine gave me breast cancer eight years ago,

Okay dokey.  If this is what she really believes it kind of calls into
question the rest of her story.

> but thankfully I am still here to tell the tale.
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> am the way I am, why society is the way it is, and things that need to
> be explained, opened up, accepted and forgiven."

Yep.

Kathy 1
kippaherring@hotmail.com - 16 Sep 2008 15:16 GMT
> <kippaherr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
> Um I think her statement directly above that contradicts her assessment of
> her state of mind :)

Indeed.

> > You have to see the positives of adoption
> > for women of my generation and not get into Irish martyrdom. Adoption
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Nice.  I love it when people tell other people what it is they are
> thinking/feeling.

Me too. Especially when they put it in the imperative form. Like, "You
HAVE TO see the positives of adoption."

> > Everybody gets a blow,
> > a wake-up call that makes them move from childhood to adulthood.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> allowing them to process that pain and simply telling them to basically "get
> over it and move on'" is *not* helpful  'advice'.

Yup. And there's that "HAVE TO" again.
It must be implanted deep in her brain.

> > "I'm afraid that birth mothers speaking about their pain would put off
> > young girls today from seeing adoption as a viable choice. There are
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> afraid that the reality of adoption (which btw can be just as "hard to live
> with" as abortion) will upset her pro-life plan for society?

She talks like a shill.

> > "I would love to be a surrogate mother, having children for people who
> > can't have them, if I was still able - why is that any different than
> > giving your child up for adoption?
>
> Yikes.  She really drank the koolaid. She really can't see the difference??

I know. It's almost unbelievable that she doesn't!
Either that - or else she's really, really, REALLY stoopid.

> > I think it was the secrecy and
> > shame that caused us so much pain. A friend of mine was at a wedding
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> It is obvious this woman deals in stereotypes.

as well as clichés, platitudes and all that chickenshit.

> > I would never go looking for him, because you just have to leave well enough alone.

Yet another "HAVE TO". Who said? Who told her that?

> > "If there was anyone I'd like to meet, it would be the mother of the
> > other child that the couple who adopted my child also adopted. I was
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> > children you have a terminal disease - and if my children can't accept
> > it, then too bad."

> > "Even though I have her number, I dare not telephone my birth mother"
>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> He might not recognize it but he *does* have a choice.

Nor does he realize that by "choosing" to believe he doesn't have a
choice he's actually making one.

> > but to keep this information from my daughter, but it means that
the
> > charade of secrecy continues . . . I am not just the object of
> > secrecy, but a participant in the process. Not only must I carry with
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> read more »
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.