 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Family Forum / Parenting / Adoption / March 2009False Allegations of CSA and Ken Pangborn
Per EBSCO, it is technically true that a Ken Pangborn is published, SELF published, ONE report. It does not appear to be research as much as a review of other research. His publication is available only from him. Evidently nobody wants to publish it and is quite old. Pangborn, K. (1980). Children at Risk: Summary of Findings & Recommendations from a Study of Federally Funded Child Abuse & Neglect Treatment Projects. Children at Risk: Summary of Findings & Recommendations from a Study of Federally Funded Child Abuse & Neglect Treatment Projects, Retrieved March 9, 2009, from SocINDEX with Full Text database. It was very difficult to get any hard research on the subject, but one review states somewhere between 2 and 8% of allegations of allegations of CSA are false. This includes both blatant lies and illegitimate pressure to get a conviction by prosecutors and investigators. Mike D. Mike: Why is it that you posted widely that you didn't find Ken using EBSCO but then you posted ONLY in alt.adoption that you found one hit for Ken? Does your EBSCO search cover INTERNATIONAL publications? Why did you badmouth what you did find as if it was "vanity press" junk when it was in fact produced at the request of government? http://groups.google.com/group/alt.adoption/msg/f32849f6b61759c4?hl=en&dmode=source Newsgroups: alt.adoption From: Michael Dobony <sur...@stopassaultnow.net> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:43:58 -0500 Local: Tues, Mar 10 2009 8:43 am Subject: False Allegations of CSA and Ken Pangborn Per EBSCO, it is technically true that a Ken Pangborn is published, SELF published, ONE report. It does not appear to be research as much as a review of other research. His publication is available only from him. Evidently nobody wants to publish it and is quite old. Pangborn, K. (1980). Children at Risk: Summary of Findings & Recommendations from a Study of Federally Funded Child Abuse & Neglect Treatment Projects. Children at Risk: Summary of Findings & Recommendations from a Study of Federally Funded Child Abuse & Neglect Treatment Projects, Retrieved March 9, 2009, from SocINDEX with Full Text database. It was very difficult to get any hard research on the subject, but one review states somewhere between 2 and 8% of allegations of allegations of CSA are false. This includes both blatant lies and illegitimate pressure to get a conviction by prosecutors and investigators. Mike D. > Mike: Why is it that you posted widely that you didn't find > Ken using EBSCO but then you posted ONLY in alt.adoption > that you found one hit for Ken? > Does your EBSCO search cover INTERNATIONAL > publications? It it INFALLIBLE? > Why did you badmouth what you did find as if > it was "vanity press" junk when it was in fact > produced at the request of government? > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.adoption/msg/f32849f6b61759c4?hl=en&dmode=source > Newsgroups: alt.adoption > From: Michael Dobony <sur...@stopassaultnow.net> > Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:43:58 -0500 > Local: Tues, Mar 10 2009 8:43 am > Subject: False Allegations of CSA and Ken Pangborn Interesting trick AGAIN. Post sh.t where I can't read it and LOUDLY PROCLAIM VICTORY.. Such INTEGRITY! > Per EBSCO, it is technically true that a Ken Pangborn is published, SELF > published, ONE report. It does not appear to be research as much as a > review of other research. His publication is available only from him. > Evidently nobody wants to publish it and is quite old. > Pangborn, K. (1980). Children at Risk: Summary of Findings & > Recommendations from a Study of Federally Funded Child Abuse & Neglect > Treatment Projects. Children at Risk: Summary of Findings & > Recommendations > from a Study of Federally Funded Child Abuse & Neglect Treatment > Projects, Retrieved March 9, 2009, from SocINDEX with Full Text database. I wonder if our guy is willing to stake his life on it being "self published?" > It was very difficult to get any hard research on the subject, but one > review states somewhere between 2 and 8% of allegations of allegations > of CSA are false. This includes both blatant lies and illegitimate > pressure to get a conviction by prosecutors and investigators. No it isn't hard. The DATA is reported EVERY year to HHS through the National Center on Child Abuse And Neglect. the 2% claim is BULLSHIT! The STOP ASSAULT NOW address should tell anyone about a slight BIAS here. /> Newsgroups: alt.adoption >> From: Michael Dobony <sur...@stopassaultnow.net> Shall we look at MIKE'S website to catch a little idea of his OBJECTIVITY? Because a woman is raped every 46 seconds somewhere in the U.S. "My relatives talk about this boy who lived with my parents before that fateful morning. I never knew this child. They talk about this outgoing, carefree child that ceased to exist one early morning around my 5th birthday before my parents got up. I heard the rustling in the other room and got up quickly, thinking my abuser had returned as he promised, but it was my father getting ready for work. My abuser, the "Big Bad Wolf," never returned. That child my relatives talk about died that morning, not even leaving me any memories of him. In his place was a very insecure, shy child who could not relate well to others, desperate for attention, affection, and approval." Every 46 seconds Mike? Sounds like many in a country of about 300 MILLION, doesn't it? Mike, What are you studying in college and how far along are you? Why did you post that Ken was not published less than an hour after you posted that he was? > Mike, What are you studying in > college and how far along are you? > > Why did you post that Ken was not published > less than an hour after you posted that he was? Interesting if one is smugly suggesting great credibility and contradicts himself in less than an hour. His "source" is at least somewhat questionable in its completeness. But that issue is for another day as is the FOR PROFIT nature of the publisher of that list of lists. >> Mike, What are you studying in >> college and how far along are you? [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > questionable in its completeness. But that issue is for another day as is > the FOR PROFIT nature of the publisher of that list of lists. You get a F- for reading comprehension. I originally claimed and still claim that you are technically correct in that you are SELF-published. Evidently the government agency you claimed to have done the research for failed to properly publish the article you did so you had to publish it yourself. Why didn't they publish it? Didn't it meet basic research standards? I also claimed to have failed to find your name on any journal article. You still refuse to provide your credentials, your published JOURNAL articles! These lists of lists have been used for decades (extension of printed lists) as a source of locating previous research on selected topics. If you were a legitimate researcher you would understand this as these are universally used as a starting point in research (review of existing research) to better formulate the research question(s). It's questionableness is only questionable to you because your claimed publications in journals is not there. So, please prove your claims of journal publication by providing the names and dates of these journal articles you authored. >>>> Mike, What are you studying in >>> college and how far along are you? >>> >>> Why did you post that Ken was not published >>> less than an hour after you posted that he was? >> Interesting if one is smugly suggesting great credibility and >> contradicts himself in less than an hour. His "source" is at least >> somewhat >> questionable in its completeness. But that issue is for another day as is >> the FOR PROFIT nature of the publisher of that list of lists. > You get a F- for reading comprehension. I originally claimed and still > claim that you are technically correct in that you are SELF-published. Self published? How? What was the NAME of the publisher you CLAIM I used? Name and PLACE of publication will do. > Evidently the government agency you claimed to have done the research for > failed to properly publish the article you did so you had to publish it > yourself. Why didn't they publish it? Didn't it meet basic research > standards? I also claimed to have failed to find your name on any journal > article. You still refuse to provide your credentials, your published > JOURNAL articles! You are making sh.t up again Mike. > These lists of lists have been used for decades (extension of printed > lists) as a source of locating previous research on selected topics. If [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > journal publication by providing the names and dates of these journal > articles you authored. The DATABASE you copy comes with a DISCLAIMER, Mike. Want to post it? You claim NONE, then ONE but claim it is SELF PUBLISHED. PROOF???? >>>>> Mike, What are you studying in >>>> college and how far along are you? [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Self published? How? What was the NAME of the publisher you CLAIM I > used? Name and PLACE of publication will do. Look up SELF in the dictionary. >> Evidently the government agency you claimed to have done the research for >> failed to properly publish the article you did so you had to publish it [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > You are making sh.t up again Mike. You are the one refusing to (incapable of) naming the journals you claim to have been published in. >> These lists of lists have been used for decades (extension of printed >> lists) as a source of locating previous research on selected topics. If [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > The DATABASE you copy comes with a DISCLAIMER, Mike. Want to post it? > You claim NONE, then ONE but claim it is SELF PUBLISHED. PROOF??? Cut and paste: Notes: Availability: Kenneth Pangborn (Privately Published), 80 M St. #12, Salt Lake City, UT 84103 ; Policy Information Center, OASPE, Rm. 438F, HHH Bldg., 200 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20201, Phone: (202) 690-6445, Fax: (202) 401-6228, E-mail: pic@osaspe.dhhs.gov Contains Extensive Bibliography On Father's Rights Duration: September 1977 - November 1980 Porgrammes evaluated: ACF-Child Welfare Services-Research and Demonstration Project No.: ACYF 77-22 Grant Number: 105-77-1047 Numbers: 1722 [PIC ID] Address: Abt Associates, Inc., 55 Wheeler Street, Cambridge MA 02138 Sponsoring Organization: ACF-ACYF. If in fact this was a government sponsored research project it would NOT be privately published. Who did you pay to do this project? Why did you need to do an "extensive bibliography on father's rights?" ONE OR NONE MIKE??? >>>>>> Mike, What are you studying in >>>>> college and how far along are you? [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >> Self published? How? What was the NAME of the publisher you CLAIM I >> used? Name and PLACE of publication will do. > Look up SELF in the dictionary. Had to be printed somewhere, Mike. WHERE????? >>> Evidently the government agency you claimed to have done the research >>> for [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >> >> You are making sh.t up again Mike. > You are the one refusing to (incapable of) naming the journals you claim > to > have been published in. Why should I post them when YOU claimj to posess ALL THE FACTS, Mike? >>> These lists of lists have been used for decades (extension of printed >>> lists) as a source of locating previous research on selected topics. If [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >> The DATABASE you copy comes with a DISCLAIMER, Mike. Want to post it? >> You claim NONE, then ONE but claim it is SELF PUBLISHED. PROOF??? > Cut and paste: > Notes: > Availability: Kenneth Pangborn (Privately Published), 80 M St. #12, [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Address: Abt Associates, Inc., 55 Wheeler Street, Cambridge MA 02138 > Sponsoring Organization: ACF-ACYF. GOLLY Mike - I actually OWN The POLICY INFORMATION CENTER? It's MINE? Pleas emike TELL ME all about YOUR GRANTS???? Dan Sullivan will shortly tell us all about HIS. So in YOUR world - your EXPERT world - "Privately Published" means SELF PUBLISHED? Or just NOT published by the Feds??? > If in fact this was a government sponsored research project it would NOT > be > privately published. Who did you pay to do this project? Why did you > need > to do an "extensive bibliography on father's rights?" So they are LYING then? Since you HAVE a copy, you'd know WHY the bibliography existed. I am having so much fun with you Mikey. And what's this Salt Lake City address AND Cambridge, Massachusetts? I guess I must be a Publishing Magnate with printing places in BOTH Utah AND Massachusetts, huh? Is ABT Associates MY company, Mike??? Now just give us some of the TEXT of the article from YOUR COPY of it. >>>>>> Mike, What are you studying in >>>>> college and how far along are you? [quoted text clipped - 61 lines] > privately published. Who did you pay to do this project? Why did you need > to do an "extensive bibliography on father's rights?" I just went to the DHHS site and you are not there, nor is your report. So, again, where are you published? >>>>>>> Mike, What are you studying in >>>>>> college and how far along are you? [quoted text clipped - 73 lines] > I just went to the DHHS site and you are not there, nor is your report. > So, again, where are you published? YAWN... Take it up with EBSCO. >>>>>>>> Mike, What are you studying in >>>>>>> college and how far along are you? [quoted text clipped - 75 lines] > > YAWN... Take it up with EBSCO. Take it up with the website listed and the federal government and the DHHS. Okay, you still have nothing published. You could easily drop us into the dirt if you would simply post the names and dates of the journals you claim to have articles published in. But you can't provide evidence of what does not exist. Your only evidence is your lies. >>>>>>>>> Mike, What are you studying in >>>>>>>> college and how far along are you? [quoted text clipped - 95 lines] > does > not exist. Your only evidence is your lies. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Have fun chasing your own dick all over the block Mike. > >>>>>>>>> Mike, What are you studying in > >>>>>>>> college and how far along are you? [quoted text clipped - 98 lines] > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Have fun chasing your own dick all over the block > Mike. You avoided the request yet again Kennie. He wanted a list of what articles and so forth that were published that you wrote. IOW to prove your claim you actually wrote anything reputable enough to be published in legitimate sources. As a supposed trial consultant you would regularly be asked to provide your CV for court analysis as to your credibility. Your self-publicity appearances on trash radio and TV talk shows don't count Kenny. Michael, I don't know how long you have met Ken Pangburn online but he has a long history of being the usenet kook with a number of credibility problems. Ken, it should be no problem for you to post what you published and articles and so forth by you. And yet you seem to be not willing to do that simple thing. Wonder why..... Moe Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan " A vampire cop? REALLY?" "http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm MOE> As a supposed trial consultant you would regularly be asked to MOE> provide your CV for court analysis as to your credibility. REALLY? Is that based on your VAST legal experience Moe? What is is that you believe a Trial Consultant does? Here is a CLUE - it is in the word CONSULTANT" in other words to "CONSULT." I know you have problems with words. For example, the word "SOME" totally confused you. You thought it mean "ALL." MOE> Your self-publicity appearances on trash radio and TV talk shows don't count Kenny. Have you been asked to appear on any TRASH shows Moe? Too bad you didn't notice news shows like the BBC, and the others. MOE> Ken, it should be no problem for you to post what you published and MOE> articles and so forth by you. And yet you seem to be not willing to do that simple thing. Wonder why..... Don't wonder - I am just feeding rope out to your pals Sullivan and Moore who try to CLAIM intimate familiarity with what I have ort have not written. In due time Moe. Moe> Ken, it should be no problem for you Moe > to post what you published and Moe > articles and so forth by you. And yet Moe > you seem to be not willing to do Moe > that simple thing. Wonder why..... KRP > Don't wonder - I am just feeding rope out to KRP > your pals Sullivan and Moore who try to KRP > CLAIM intimate familiarity with what I KRP > have [or] have not written. In due time Moe. Hey Moe! Dan must have figured it out too! Didn't you notice how he did the "ot" thing to try to bury this? http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/0002789 969a02c84 > Moe> Ken, it should be no problem for you > Moe > to post what you published and [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/... Nice doggie, Eat your Kennie treat now Fido. (( Sound of Ken Pangburn upchucking his cookies after a drinking binge followeed by a dog whining and lapping up the spill )) Good doggie, Too cheap to get your booze, ahem, unprocessed. (( laughing)) On Mar 17, 1:25 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote: [...] >> Hey Moe! Dan must have figured it out too! >> Didn't you notice how he did the "ot" thing [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Nice doggie, Eat your Kennie treat now Fido. G'Tard the dancing chimp is an obedient lap dog. > (( Sound of Ken Pangburn upchucking his cookies after a drinking >binge followeed by a dog whining and lapping up the spill )) > >Good doggie, Too cheap to get your booze, ahem, unprocessed. > >(( laughing)) BOKE! :-) >Moe> Ken, it should be no problem for you >Moe > to post what you published and [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >Didn't you notice how he did the "ot" thing >to try to bury this? Is that like how you try to distract from the truth by posting information you KNOW isn't true? Have you caught on that when you do that, you actually draw attention TO the truth you desperately want hidden? Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON (DOB 05/22/1959) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 2 SPEED Disposition Status GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT "That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!" Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so stupid he thinks I'm Asian. MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/395db830731df54a http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead " ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would address the most pressing problems of our day. ... " April 2000, Gregory Hanson http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson > MOE> As a supposed trial consultant you would regularly be asked to > MOE> provide your CV for court analysis as to your credibility. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > words. For example, the word "SOME" totally confused you. You thought it > mean "ALL." Nice rant. Even so its bullshit. I question your CV because of what you've been claiming about BWS and how up to 70 percent of rape victims lie. If you actually WERE the sexual abuse expert you pretended to be for years, you would know how rape traumatizes the victim and how women are beaten into submission. You would have known about the " date rape" drug some males use to take advantage of females they want to violate. Interestingly your "studies" seem to end some years ago and your ignorance and misogyny is sadly obvious. I'm starting to thing you went into this " sexual abuse" field because you wanted to jack off with stories of women being violated and abused. It would fit your personality. > MOE> Your self-publicity appearances on trash radio and TV talk shows don't > count Kenny. > > Have you been asked to appear on any TRASH shows Moe? Too bad you didn't > notice news shows like the BBC, and the others. I noticed you were on Morton Downey Jr's show, Not exactly high quality, but hey for a publicity whore like you you went anywhere they let you on. BTW been on any of these shows lately? They don't call you anymore? As for me appearing on any " trash" shows or whatever, I am fortunate in that I am not the publicity whore you obviously were. Your boasting reminds me of another media whore, Bob Larson, who now bills himself as the "real exorcist". He has a credibility problem just like you do. > MOE> Ken, it should be no problem for you to post what you published and > MOE> articles and so forth by you. And yet you seem to be not willing to do [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Moore who try to CLAIM intimate familiarity with what I have ort have not > written. In due time Moe. Yeah promises promises. You did the same act with Moore years ago Kennie. Lotta noise but no proof. Moe Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan " A vampire cop? REALLY?" "http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm [...] >> > Take it up with the website listed and the federal government and the >> > DHHS. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > You avoided the request yet again Kennie. He wanted a list of what >articles and so forth that were published that you wrote. I want to know the title of the *book* he wrote and the name he used. There is NO record of Kenny-Bob having a book published under any title. To date, Pangborn has refused to name the book or the name he used to have it published. > IOW to prove your claim you actually wrote anything reputable enough >to be published in legitimate sources. According to all available records, Pangborn self pubished two issues of a newsletter. That's it. > As a supposed trial consultant you would regularly be asked to >provide your CV for court analysis as to your credibility. And seeing that he BOUGHT his degrees from a diploma mill... > Your self-publicity appearances on trash radio and TV talk shows >don't count Kenny. Especially since the appearances were nothing more than his calling in to speak to the people being interviewed. > Michael, I don't know how long you have met Ken Pangburn online but >he has a long history of being the usenet kook with a number of [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Wonder why..... Short answer: Pangborn lied. Longer answer: Pangborn's mental illness, which he has claimed on at least two occasions is a result of his alcoholism, prevents him from being honest much of the time. TWO of Kent Wills' usenet newsgroup identities: http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=5zmbTBIAAADOJ684KS60nUaU_ zmlHzoM8rhlH0Pnl47z4AZhN98BFg compu...@yahoo.com http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=tO2J8xIAAAD-FV_7I-6E0Mcpe oqRe5_P8rhlH0Pnl47z4AZhN98BFg compu...@gmail.com Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8 1969 Felony Garage Burglar used teen as accomplice http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/8edd11c aa03c4f37?hl=en&dmode=source Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services, misc.legal, soc.men, alt.support.foster-parents, alt.adoption From: "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:06:14 -0600 KW > Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON KW > (DOB 05/22/1959) KW > CRIMINAL COMPLAINT KW > 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST Kent posted a FRAUD that I had an OWI (Drunk Driving). I've only tried to get drunk once in my entire life. Except for that and a few Rum/Pepsi (social drinks) I do not drink alcohol. Of course, I never had any accusation, charge or conviction for OWI. Like your Vodka there comrade Willenski? http://www.public-records-now.com/Search/SearchResults.aspx?vw=people&input=name &fn=Kent&mn=&ln=Wills&city=&state=AR&criteria=Kent;;;;Wills;;;;AR;;;;;; WILLS, KENT B [ Collected March 7, 2009] Age: 40 Rogers, AR Ankeny, IA Marshalltown, IA Bartlett, IL Villa Park, IL And from another source: Hanover Park, IL WILLS, FREDERICK ALFRED (Kent's Dad) WILLS, MICHAEL A (Kent's son??) WILLS, JANET RAE (Kent's Mom) HARTWIG,TIFFANY JEANNE (Kent's sister AKA Tiffany J Wills) From another source: Kelly M Wills Kent's wife ?? ) Pay close attention to past owners of 202 NW College Ave. Kent made affirmative claims about the property online. Kent's folks sold it in 1994 and he lived there! GeoParcel 8024-15-452-029 District/Parcel 181/00392-048-000 http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/protest/pickdpP.cgi?dp18100392048000=1&r eport=WebPublic&fixed=N&sketch=Y&map=Y&photo=Y& [ As Collected March 7, 2009 ] Seller: WILLS, FRED A. & JANET R. Buyer: THE SWEENEY REVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST 04/26/1994 135,000 D/Deed 7010/188 - Seller: SHELDAHL, ERIC A. Buyer: WILLS, FRED 01/02/1990 130,500 D/Deed 6189/972 A Larger photo: http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/seephoto/photosize.cgi?gp=802415452029&s ize=Large Do It Yourself Instructions to look up Kent's record Iowa Department of Corrections records for Kent http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768 Name Kent Bradley Wills [ As Collected March 7, 2009 ] Offender Number 1155768 Sex M Birth Date 01/08/1969 Age 40 Location Offense County Of Commitment Commitment Date Duration TDD/SDD * * TDD = Tentative Discharge Date * SDD = Supervision Discharge Date Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 12/16/2008 Probation C Felony Polk 12/16/2008 Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 11/25/2003 Iowa Courts Docket and Disposition web site http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ Iowa Courts Online Search < Start A Case Search Here! > click Iowa Courts Online Search Search Selection Under Trial Court < click on Case Search > Wills Kent B 02401 ESPR015146 INA J WILLS ESTATE 05771 FECR145250 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969 05771 FECR176876 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969 05771 SCSC310505 SWEENEY RENTALS VS KENT 05771 SCSC335210 CITI FINANCIAL VS KENT 05771 SCSC374163 SFI F SCHERLE PRES VS KENT 05771 SCSC374164 SFI F SCHERLE III PRES VS KENT 05771 STAN201670 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969 05771 STAN210929 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969 05771 SWCR177169 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969 A list of case numbers will be presented. Two on that list have the code "FE" in them. One of the two ends in the two digits "76". Click that case number. A case caption will appear. Tabs available to the public include "Criminal Charges", "Filings" and "Financial". Use the "back" button on your browser to move among them or just hit the various tab buttons. (See filings text if attached further down below) IN PRINTED LAW BOOKS West's North Western Reporter Second Series A Unit of the National Reporter System Volume 696 N.W.2d Cite as 696 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 2005) Kent's Appeal http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.a sp?Printable=true http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04 -0202&invol=1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 31 / 04-0202 Filed May 6, 2005 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. KENT BRADLEY WILLS, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael D. Huppert, Judge. Defendant appeals claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. AFFIRMED. Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender, and Tricia Johnston, Assistant State Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin Cmelik, Assistant Attorney General, John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee. WIGGINS, Justice. Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary contending that an attached garage is a separate occupied structure from that of the living quarters of the residence. In this appeal, we must determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for (1) failing to move for judgment of acquittal on the basis there was insufficient evidence to convict Wills of second-degree burglary when he entered an attached garage of a residence when no persons were present in the garage, but when persons were present in the living quarters; and (2) failing to object to a jury instruction based on this same argument. Because we find there was no legal basis for the motion for judgment of acquittal or the objection to the jury instruction, Wills' trial counsel was not ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. I. Background Facts and Proceedings. Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called the local police to report that a car alarm sounded in the resident's neighborhood. The city dispatched a police officer to the location. Observing nothing unusual, the officer left the area, only to be stopped a couple of blocks later by a person who informed the officer he had witnessed someone running from the area of the car alarm. As the officer started driving back to the area of the car alarm, he noticed a person walking on the sidewalk. The officer asked the person, a minor, if he had noticed anybody running from the area. The minor answered that he had not. While the officer and another officer were speaking to the minor, another resident of the neighborhood arrived in her car and informed the officers that she had observed two people, one of whom was heavy set with a blinking light on his back pocket, walking in the area of her neighbor's residence. She observed the heavier-set individual, later identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's attached garage through an unlocked service door. She further observed a smaller individual standing by a van parked in the neighbor's driveway. The officers eventually let the minor leave even though they found a large amount of coins, a flashlight, and an electronic pocket organizer in his pockets. After releasing the minor, the police officers drove to the residence where the neighbor observed the two suspicious people and woke the owner. The owner, his wife, and two daughters were in the residence sleeping at the time. After a search of his vehicles, the owner discovered change and an electronic pocket organizer were missing from the vehicles. The owner's daughter reported a diamond ring and some change were missing from her vehicle. The officers then contacted the minor's parents, who informed the officers the minor was with Wills. After the officers questioned the minor again, he admitted his involvement in the theft and implicated Wills in the burglary. Although Wills denied involvement in the burglary, the officers arrested him. The State filed a trial information charging Wills with second-degree burglary. The State later amended the information to include two additional charges of burglary in the third degree and using a juvenile to commit an indictable offense. The jury returned a verdict finding Wills guilty of the crimes of burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, and using a juvenile to commit an indictable offense. Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. II. Scope of Review. Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are derived from the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674, 691-93 (1984). Our review for a claim involving violations of the Constitution is de novo. State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100 (Iowa 2004). We normally preserve ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims for postconviction relief actions. State v. Carter, 602 N.W. 2d 818, 820 (Iowa 1999). However, we will address such claims on direct appeal when the record is sufficient to permit a ruling. State v. Artzer, 609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The appellate record in the present case is sufficient to allow us to address Wills' ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims on direct appeal. In order for a defendant to succeed on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant must prove: (1) counsel failed to perform an essential duty and (2) prejudice resulted. Id. Prejudice results when "there is a reasonable probability that, but for the counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378 (Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068, 80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills' arguments also raise issues of statutory interpretation, which we review for correction of errors at law. State v. Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004). III. Analysis. To find Wills guilty of burglary in the second degree, the State had to prove Wills perpetrated a burglary "in or upon an occupied structure in which one or more persons are present . . . ." Iowa Code § 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added). In this appeal, Wills first contends his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move for a judgment of acquittal on the basis there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the time Wills entered the garage, there were persons present in or upon the occupied structure. Wills concedes the garage was an occupied structure, but argues the living quarters and the attached garage are separate and independent occupied structures; therefore, the jury could not have found there were people present in the attached garage at the time of the burglary. The Code defines an "occupied structure" as: [A]ny building, structure, appurtenances to buildings and structures, land, water or air vehicle, or similar place adapted for overnight accommodation of persons, or occupied by persons for the purpose of carrying on business or other activity therein, or for the storage or safekeeping of anything of value. Such a structure is an "occupied structure" whether or not a person is actually present. Id. § 702.12. Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590 N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to argue the garage and the living quarters are separate and independent occupied structures. In Smothers, two separate and distinct businesses connected by interior fire doors were operated in the same structure. 590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant committed two burglaries by entering each business because "[t]he facility's construction history and physical make-up demonstrate that the portions are independent working units which constitute '[a] combination of materials to form a construction for occupancy [or] use.'" Id. Smothers is not at odds with the present case because the living quarters and the garage are not separate or independent units of the residence. Our review of the record reveals the garage in question was a three-car attached garage separated from the living quarters by a door. The same roof covered the garage as the rest of the residence. The living quarters surrounded the garage on two sides. It was structurally no different from any other room in the residence. The garage was a functional part of the residence. On the night of the incident, the door was unlocked. The owner of the residence used two stalls in the garage to park the family vehicles. The owner used the third stall for his motorcycle. As such, the garage and the living quarters are a single "structure" or "building" functioning as an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence including the garage is a single "occupied structure" under section 702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App.1995) (holding defendant's entry into an attached garage constituted first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house; therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary of an inhabited dwelling house); People v. Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994) (holding "ordinarily an attached garage is a 'dwelling' because it is part of the structure in which the owner or occupant lives"); State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53 (N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding "burglary of the [attached] garage was burglary of the dwelling house because the garage was a part of the structure used as living quarters"); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d 760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988) (holding "[s]ince the garage in the present case was structurally part of a building which was used for overnight lodging of various persons, it must be considered as part of a dwelling"); White v. State, 630 S.W. 2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982) (holding an attached garage under the same roof as the home would be considered a habitation within the purview of the penal code because the garage is a structure appurtenant to and connected to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P. 2d 551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993) (holding the definition of a dwelling under Washington's burglary statute included an attached garage). Had Wills' trial counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal on the basis there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the time Wills entered the garage there were no persons present in or upon the occupied structure, it would have been overruled by the court because the owner and his family were present in the residence at the time of the burglary. Wills also claims his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the jury instruction used by the district court on the same ground; that the living quarters were a separate and independent occupied structure from the attached garage. The instruction as given stated: The State must prove all of the following elements of Burglary in the Second Degree as to Count I: 1. On or about the 12th day of August, 2003, the defendant or someone he aided and abetted broke into or entered the residence at . . . . 2. The residence at . . . was an occupied structure as defined in Instruction No. 29. 3. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did not have permission or authority to break into the residence at ... 4. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did so with the specific intent to commit a theft therein. 5. During the incident persons were present in or upon the occupied structure. If the State has proved all of the elements, the defendant is guilty of Burglary in the Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove any of the elements, the defendant is not guilty of Burglary in the Second Degree and you will then consider the charge of Attempted Burglary in the Second Degree explained in Instruction No. 21. (Emphasis added.) Wills' claim is without merit. As we have discussed, the residence is the one and only "occupied structure" under the facts of this case. Had Wills' trial counsel made this objection to the instruction, it would have been overruled. Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not ineffective for failing to move for a judgment of acquittal or objecting to the instruction because there was no legal basis for the motion or objection. See State v. Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234, 238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise an issue that has no merit). IV. Disposition. We affirm the judgment of the district court because Wills' trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise meritless issues. AFFIRMED. ----------------------------------- [ As Collected March 7, 2009 ] Filings Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK) Citation Number: Event Filed By Filed Create Date Last Updated Action Date ORDER OF DISCHARGE OVROM ELIZA 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 Comments: FROM PROBATION OTHER EVENT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 Comments: FIELD DISCHARGE REPORT OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 Comments: REVOCATION HEARING SET FOR 1/07/2009 IS CANCELLED DEFENDANT HAS NOT PAID IN FULL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ORDER FOR PROBATION REVOCATION HEARING MOISAN CYNTHIA M 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 Comments: ON 1/7/09 AT 9:30AM RM204 PROBATION REVOCATION 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 Comments: REPORT OF VIOLATIONS FILED BY JAN HORNOCKER FORMAL PROBATION HUTCHISON ROBERT A 01/25/2006 01/26/2006 01/26/2006 Comments: EXTENDED TO 01/16/09 OR UNTIL CONDITIONS ARE MET COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/13/2006 01/13/2006 01/13/2006 OTHER ORDER HUTCHISON ROBERT A 01/11/2006 01/13/2006 01/13/2006 Comments: DEFT'S PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09; DEFT TO COMPLETE CONDITIONS LISTED OTHER EVENT 09/15/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005 Comments: THE SUPREME COURT RETURNED FILE, PSI, 4 TRANSCRIPTS, AND 1 ENVELOPE OF EXHIBITS OTHER EVENT APPELLATE DEFENDER'S OFFICE 06/09/2005 06/13/2005 06/13/2005 Comments: STATEMENT OF HOURS 15.9 HOURS = $795.00 ATTORNEY - GRETA TRUMAN OTHER EVENT CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 06/02/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005 Comments: BILL OF COSTS $27.50 TAXED AGAINST THE APPELLANT AND PAYABLE TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL #04-0202 OTHER ORDER SUPREME COURT OF IOWA 06/02/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005 Comments: RE DEFT'S APPEAL CLAIMING INEFFECTIVE COUNSEL: JUDGEMENT AFFIRMED #04-0202 PROCEDENDO CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 06/02/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005 Comments: AFFIRMED PROCEED W/DILIGENCE AS IF THERE HAD BEEN NO APPEAL #04-0202 COMMUNITY SERVICE 05/25/2004 05/27/2004 05/27/2004 Comments: 135 HRS COMPLETED 5/24/04 INDIGENT DEFENSE CLAIM FORM TAYLOR KAREN 05/11/2004 05/13/2004 05/13/2004 Comments: $1150 ELECTRONIC FILING OTHER EVENT 04/26/2004 04/28/2004 04/28/2004 Comments: SUPREME COURT REC'D 1 FILE, 1 PSI ENVELOPE, 1 EXHIBIT(1 ENVELOPE DATED 1/21/04) REC'D 4/20/04 OTHER ORDER NICKERSON DON 04/23/2004 04/27/2004 04/27/2004 Comments: THE BALANCE OF ATTNY FEE AND CC SHALL BE CONVERTED TO 135 HRS COMM SERVICE TO BE COMPLETED FROM FT DSM FACILITY OR TRANSFER TO INTERSTATE COMPACT COMMUNITY SERVICE 04/22/2004 04/23/2004 04/23/2004 Comments: 150 HRS COMPLETED APRIL 8, 2004 OTHER EVENT 04/20/2004 04/20/2004 04/20/2004 Comments: RECD CHANGE OF ADDRESS FOR DEFT OTHER EVENT 04/20/2004 04/20/2004 04/20/2004 Comments: FILE AND PSI SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT ONE ENVELOPE OF EXHIBITS FILED 1/21/04 SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT OTHER EVENT 04/19/2004 04/19/2004 04/19/2004 Comments: SUP CRT RECEIVED 2 TRANSCRIPTS OF PROCEEDINGS FILED 4/1/04 (VOL I & II) SUP CRT 04-202 OTHER EVENT 04/06/2004 05/18/2004 05/18/2004 Comments: 2 TRANSCRIPTS FILED 4/1/04 SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT MAXEY REBECCA 04/01/2004 04/05/2004 04/05/2004 Comments: OF PROCEEDINGS ON 12/16/03 VOLUME II DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT MAXEY REBECCA 04/01/2004 04/05/2004 04/05/2004 Comments: OF PROCEEDINGS ON 12/15/03 VOLUME I OTHER EVENT 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 Comments: EXHIBITS RETURNED OTHER EVENT 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 Comments: ENVELOPE OF EXHIBITS CHECKED OUT TO COURT REPORTER R.M. OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 03/29/2004 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 Comments: MOTION IS GRANTED REGARDING REVIEW OF PAYMENT OF COURT APPOINTED ATTY FEES AND THE STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER IS ORDERED TO MAKE PAYMENT AS REQUESTED. OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 03/29/2004 03/30/2004 03/31/2004 ENTERED IN ERROR Comments: STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER SHALL MAKE PAYMENT AS REQUESTED. MOTION 03/18/2004 03/19/2004 03/19/2004 Comments: TO ENLARGE TIME FOR DOCKETING FILED BY ASSISTANT APPELLATE DEFENDER ORDER SETTING HEARING OVROM ELIZA 03/15/2004 03/16/2004 03/16/2004 Comments: ON MOTION TO REVIEW ACTION RE:PAYMENT OF COURT APPOINTED ATTY. 3/29/04 8:15AM RM209A MOTION 03/15/2004 03/16/2004 03/16/2004 Comments: FOR REVIEW OF ACTION REGARDING PAYMENT OF COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY FEES FILED BY ATDF OTHER EVENT 03/11/2004 03/11/2004 03/11/2004 Comments: SUPREME COURT RECVD 2 TRANSCRIPTS OF SENTENCING ON 1/16/04 AND STATUS CONF ON 12/12/03 FILED 3/1/04 04-202 OTHER EVENT 03/09/2004 03/09/2004 03/09/2004 Comments: 2 TRANSCRIPTS FILED 3/1/04 SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE CLAIM FORM TAYLOR KAREN 03/09/2004 03/18/2004 03/18/2004 Comments: $1350.00 ELECTRONIC FILING DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 03/01/2004 03/03/2004 03/03/2004 Comments: OF STATUS CONFERENCE ON 12/12/2003 DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 03/01/2004 03/03/2004 03/03/2004 Comments: OF SENTENCING ON 01/16/2004 OTHER EVENT APPELLATE DEFENDER'S OFFICE 02/26/2004 02/27/2004 02/27/2004 Comments: COMBINED CERTIFICATE OTHER EVENT 02/24/2004 02/24/2004 02/24/2004 Comments: DOCKET ENTRIES RECEIVED BY SUPREME COURT 2-10-04; SUPREME COURT NUMBER 04-202 ORDER APPOINTING OVROM ELIZA 02/18/2004 02/19/2004 02/19/2004 Comments: ORDER GRANTING K TAYLOR TO W/D APPELLATE COUNSEL IS APPT OTHER APPLICATION 02/18/2004 02/19/2004 02/19/2004 Comments: TO WITHDRAW OTHER EVENT 02/10/2004 02/10/2004 02/10/2004 Comments: DOCKET ENTRIES AND CERTIFIED COPY OF NOTICE OF APPEAL SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT OTHER EVENT TAYLOR KAREN A 02/09/2004 02/10/2004 02/10/2004 Comments: COURT APPOINTED BILLING 47 HOURS = $2500 OTHER EVENT TAYLOR KAREN 02/09/2004 02/10/2004 02/10/2004 ENTERED IN ERROR Comments: COURT NOTICE OF APPEAL TAYLOR KAREN A 02/06/2004 02/09/2004 02/09/2004 Comments: FILED BY ATDF OTHER EVENT 01/23/2004 01/27/2004 01/27/2004 Comments: ADDENDUM TO PSI REPORT EXHIBIT MAXEY REBECCA 01/21/2004 01/21/2004 01/21/2004 Comments: STATE'S EXHIBITS 1-$13.21; 2-$24.25 (IN VAULT); 3-LIGHT; 4&5-WRITTEN STATEMENT; 6,7,8-DIAGRAM 1 ENVELOPE & VAULT OTHER EVENT 01/20/2004 01/26/2004 01/26/2004 Comments: VORP VICTIM DOES NOT WANT TO VORP NO RESTITUTION ISSUES AT THIS TIME VICTIM DENNIS AND JAMIE WIEBEN COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/20/2004 01/20/2004 01/20/2004 COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 01/16/2004 01/20/2004 01/20/2004 Comments: $15.00 PRE SENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT PSI 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 ORDER OF DISPOSITION OVROM ELIZA 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 Comments: FOUND GUILTY BY JURY/PRISON-SUSPENDED; FORMAL PROBATION; FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS; COMMUNITY SERVED; RESTITUTION-SUPP ORDER TO FOLLOW; VORP; APPEAL BOND $13000 C/S ORDER OF DISPOSITION OVROM ELIZA 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 ENTERED IN ERROR Comments: PLED GUILTY/PRISON-SUSPENDED; FORMAL PROBATION; FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS; COMMUNITY SERVED; RESTITUTION-SUPP ORDER TO FOLLOW; VORP; APPEAL BOND $13000 C/S MITTIMUS TO STATE INSTITUTION WILLS KENT BRADLEY 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 Comments: **FORT DES MOINES** RETURN OF SERVICE - OTHER POLK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 12/23/2003 12/26/2003 12/26/2003 Comments: TRANSPORT COSTS $96.24 OTHER EVENT 12/22/2003 12/23/2003 12/23/2003 Comments: DEFT'S COPY OF ORDER TO EXCEED STATE FEE LIMITATION RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE MAXEY REBECCA 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 CRIMINAL VERDICT HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 Comments: OF GUILTY TO BURGLARY 2ND, 3RD, AND USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE OFFENSE; DCS WILL SUBMIT A PSI BY 1 WK PRIOR TO SENTENCING DATE; PRESENTENCE CONF & SENTENCING 1-16-04 @ 8:30 AM IN RM 209A; BOND CONT AMENDED TRIAL INFORMATION HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 Comments: FILED BY JOHN JUDISCH JURY SELECTION HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 INSTRUCTIONS 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 Comments: TO THE JURY AND STATEMENT OF THE CASE OTHER ORDER HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/16/2003 12/17/2003 12/17/2003 Comments: JUV SEAN BILYEU SHALL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE CUSTODY OF POLK CO SHERIFF FOR THE DURATION OF HIS REQUIRED TESTIMONY/PRESENCE IN THIS MATTER. SEAN BILYEU SHALL REMAIN IN THE CUSTODY OF POLK CO SHERIFF OR ANY OTHER LOCATION (MEYER HALL) DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE SHERIFF UNTIL THE POLK CO SHERIFF CAN EXECUTE THE TIMELY TRANSPORT OF SEAN BILYEU FROM THE CUSTODY OF THE SHERIFF TO THE ELDORA TRAINING CENTER. OTHER ORDER HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/16/2003 12/16/2003 12/16/2003 Comments: DEFT TO BE RETURNED FROM ELDORA-COTTAGE 5 BY JIM TROTTER, INVESTIGATOR/CTY ATTY'S OFFICE; DEFT CAN BE PRESENT AT HIS TESTIMONY ON 12-16-03 OTHER ORDER HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/15/2003 12/16/2003 12/16/2003 Comments: ATDF IS PERMITTED TO EXCEED GUIDELINE FOR CT APPT ATTY IN THIS MATTER AND THAT THIS ORDER SHALL INCLUED ALL FEES INCURRED AS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. APPLICATION TO EXCEED FEES 12/15/2003 12/16/2003 12/16/2003 COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 12/12/2003 12/17/2003 12/17/2003 MOTION IN LIMINE TAYLOR KAREN 12/12/2003 12/15/2003 12/15/2003 ORDER SETTING HEARING OVROM ELIZA 12/05/2003 12/08/2003 12/08/2003 Comments: STATUS CONF: 12/12/03 @ 10:00 AM RM 204 RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 11/20/2003 12/09/2003 12/09/2003 Comments: 4=$0 RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 11/18/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 Comments: 3=$0 ORDER SETTING HEARING OVROM ELIZA 11/14/2003 11/14/2003 11/14/2003 Comments: STATUS CONFERENCE 11/13/03 9AM RM 204 ALL PARTIES MUST BE PRESENT ORDER SETTING TRIAL OVROM ELIZA 11/13/2003 11/14/2003 11/14/2003 Comments: 12/15/03 @ 9:00 AM RM 204 WAIVER OF SPEEDY TRIAL TAYLOR KAREN 11/13/2003 11/14/2003 11/14/2003 Comments: LIMITED RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 11/10/2003 11/12/2003 11/12/2003 Comments: 1 = $0 OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 Comments: DEPOSITION OF DAVID DUVALL OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 Comments: DEPOSITION OF BETH ANN SKOGEN OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 Comments: DEPOSITION OF NEIL LEMKE OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 Comments: DEPOSITION OF DENNIS WIEBEN OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 Comments: DEPOSITION OF NATALIE BALUKOFF OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 Comments: DEPOSITION OF SEAN BILYEU RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 10/31/2003 11/04/2003 11/04/2003 Comments: 6=$0 AMENDED TRIAL INFORMATION OVROM ELIZA 10/31/2003 11/03/2003 11/03/2003 Comments: FILED BY JOHN JUDISCH NOTICE WARD JAMES P 10/31/2003 11/03/2003 11/03/2003 Comments: OF ADDITIONAL WITNESSES DNU - SUBPOENA PER DUCES TECUM 10/31/2003 11/03/2003 11/03/2003 Comments: 1 - $13.70 OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: FOR DEPOSITIONS AND SERVICE AT STATE EXPENSE OTHER APPLICATION 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: FOR DEPOSITIONS AND SERVICE AT STATE EXPENSE NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: OF DEPOSITION NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 10/07/2003 10/08/2003 10/08/2003 Comments: ORDER ENTERED 9/18/03 SETTING TRIAL FOR 11/19/03 WAS IS ERROR. TRIAL IS RESET FOR 11/12/03 @9:00 AM RM 204 OTHER EVENT 09/24/2003 09/26/2003 09/26/2003 Comments: DEFT'S COPY OF APP TO W/D RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE OVROM ELIZA 09/18/2003 09/19/2003 09/19/2003 Comments: WAS HELD; TRIAL ON 11-19-03 ATDF TAYLOR OTHER EVENT AMUNDSON LAURA K 08/26/2003 09/02/2003 09/02/2003 Comments: STATEMENT OF HOURS .4-$18.00 APPEARANCE TAYLOR KAREN 08/25/2003 08/26/2003 08/26/2003 Comments: FILED BY KAREN TAYLOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL OVROM ELIZA 08/21/2003 08/22/2003 08/22/2003 Comments: OF ADULT PUBLIC DEF IS GRANTED KAREN TAYLOR IS APPOINTED ORDER OF ARRAIGNMENT MCGHEE ODELL 08/21/2003 08/21/2003 08/21/2003 Comments: Pretrial Conference 09/18/2003 01:30 PM DCC1 Trial 10/22/2003 09:00 AM DCC9 Bond is continued TRIAL INFORMATION OVROM ELIZA 08/20/2003 08/20/2003 08/20/2003 Comments: FILED BY JAMES WARD ORDER FOR ARRAIGNMENT MCGHEE ODELL 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 Comments: IN CUSTODY ON 8/21/03 AT 10:30AM JAILCOURT OUT OF CUSTODY AT 8AM ROOM 204 PRELIM HAS NOT BEEN WAIVED SET FOR 8/22/03 DNU - HEARING FOR BOND REDUCTION MCGHEE ODELL 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 Comments: BOND $13000 C/S APP FOR COUNSEL/FINANCIAL STATMENT MCGHEE ODELL 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 Comments: APPROVED PD IS APPOINTED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 Comments: BURGLARY 2ND ANPD 03-75354 HEARING FOR INITIAL APPEARANCE MCGHEE ODELL 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 Comments: Preliminary Hearing 08/22/2003 08:00 AM DA03 Bond Review 08/14/2003 08:30 AM DA04 Bond set for 713.5 $13000 C/S Total Bond $13000 C/S Indexed PUBLIC DEFENDER-POLK COUNTYPIN- PK1000375 Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK) Citation Number: Text reconfigured for ease of display in usenet Orig Paid Due Summary 3501.70 3501.70 0.00 COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 FINE 125.00 125.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 RESTITUTION 27.50 27.50 0.00 OTHER ------------------------------------- $3654.20 $3654.20 $0.00 > [...] > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > To date, Pangborn has refused to name the book or the name he used to > have it published. Gee wonder why? If he did " publish" a book it would be via a vanity press, which in most cases ( not all) means said book sucks badly. > > IOW to prove your claim you actually wrote anything reputable enough > >to be published in legitimate sources. > > According to all available records, Pangborn self pubished two issues > of a newsletter. That's it. Sheeit, self-publishing a newsletter is what damn near anyone can do! Fan clubs do that all the time. > > As a supposed trial consultant you would regularly be asked to > >provide your CV for court analysis as to your credibility. > > And seeing that he BOUGHT his degrees from a diploma mill... Among other things that would put into question his actual credibility and expertise. > > Your self-publicity appearances on trash radio and TV talk shows > >don't count Kenny. > > Especially since the appearances were nothing more than his calling in > to speak to the people being interviewed. (( laughter)) Talk about leeching! He wasn't even asked to BE the guest interviewed!! > > Michael, I don't know how long you have met Ken Pangburn online but > >he has a long history of being the usenet kook with a number of [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Short answer: Pangborn lied. Obviously. > Longer answer: Pangborn's mental illness, which he has claimed on at > least two occasions is a result of his alcoholism, prevents him from being > honest much of the time. Also his massive ego. Moe Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan " A vampire cop? REALLY?" "http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm MD > You get a F- for reading comprehension. I originally MD > claimed and still claim that you are technically MD > correct in that you are SELF-published. Self published on a government grant? Are you smoking crack? > Mike, What are you studying in > college and how far along are you? > > Why did you post that Ken was not published > less than an hour after you posted that he was? Pangborn has never had a book published. This is in dirrect conrast to his claims that he has. Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON (DOB 05/22/1959) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 2 SPEED Disposition Status GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT "That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!" Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so stupid he thinks I'm Asian. MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/395db830731df54a http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead " ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would address the most pressing problems of our day. ... " April 2000, Gregory Hanson http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson > /> Newsgroups: alt.adoption > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > Every 46 seconds Mike? Sounds like many in a country of about 300 > MILLION, doesn't it? As an alleged sexual abuse expert Ken you know the rape statistics. One in ten rape victims report their rapes. And child rapists do it over 100 times before they get caught on average. And how nice of you to mock Michael who clearly told about child rape. You are a disgusting sonofabitch Ken. Here is a boy who lost his childhood innocence to a sex pervert and you MOCK him? Disgusting doesn't even begin to describe you Pangborn. Moe Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan " A vampire cop? REALLY?" "http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm > Shall we look at MIKE'S website to catch a little idea of his OBJECTIVITY? > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > and > approval." > Every 46 seconds Mike? Sounds like many in a country of about 300 > MILLION, doesn't it? MOE> As an alleged sexual abuse expert Ken you know the rape statistics. MOE> One in ten rape victims report their rapes. And child rapists do it MOE> over 100 times before they get caught on average. Nice statistics Moe. Bullshit, but interesting. > > Shall we look at MIKE'S website to catch a little idea of his OBJECTIVITY? > [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > Nice statistics Moe. Bullshit, but interesting. Any better than YOUR stats of up to 70 percent of rape victims lie, Kennie? Did your ex wife lie about her alleged gang rape or did you lie about it to hide behind like a coward? If your daughter was raped would you call her a liar? Moe Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan " A vampire cop? REALLY?" "http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm MOE> Did your ex wife lie about her alleged gang rape or did you lie about MOE> it to hide behind like a coward? Absolutely NOT. She didn't have to rely on externals to validate herself or her story. She IS a VERY strong woman. MOE> If your daughter was raped would you call her a liar? ONLY if, in fact she DID lie. Oh and More - IF you weren't blowing so much feminist bullshit out of your a.s, you might know that the Journal article that I currently have IN PRESS is about correcting problems in forensic interviews of child sexual abuse victims so that their testimony will survive challenges. > MOE> Did your ex wife lie about her alleged gang rape or did you lie about > MOE> it to hide behind like a coward? [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > PRESS is about correcting problems in forensic interviews of child sexual > abuse victims so that their testimony will survive challenges. Isn't that something, Moe? That it's a TWO WAY street? Getting rid of the liars strengthens the REAL cases. > > "whitevamp" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > That it's a TWO WAY street? > Getting rid of the liars strengthens the REAL cases. Nice doggie, good doggie, do your master's bidding. Moe Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan " A vampire cop? REALLY?" "http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm > MOE> Did your ex wife lie about her alleged gang rape or did you lie about > MOE> it to hide behind like a coward? [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > PRESS is about correcting problems in forensic interviews of child sexual > abuse victims so that their testimony will survive challenges. So you claim,but I've seen you lie many times. Considering your level of language usage, I'm betting IF you actually submitted an article to a presumable professional periodical ( " journal is not specific), to make your verbage acceptable to to the professionals, you used the words of others. :-D You're full of it Ken. Moe Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan " A vampire cop? REALLY?" "http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> > Shall we look at MIKE'S website to catch a little idea of his OBJECTIVI= >TY? [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > If your daughter was raped would you call her a liar? He probably would. He seems to have a very condescending attitude toward ALL women. Did you know that his daughter was involved in the adult film industry? And, Ken humiliated her by posting her stage name to usenet? http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex criminals "[I have] [n]ever had [any] standing in the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer's Association or AN Y connection to them." - --Ken Pangborn in a usenet post on January 1, 2009, denying affiliation with the TCDLA, to whom he provided bogus educational credentials. His lie is disproved here: http://web.archive.org/web/20060822021821/www.tcdla.com/secure/experts/inde x.shtml "Some photo of some girl without even any documentation on THAT only proves that YOU are a PSYCHO! A really STUPID one at that!" - --Ken Pangborn, admitting to being a "stupid" "psycho" in message-ID <jOp3l.292$Es4.229@nwrddc01.gnilink.net> "The FACT is that [my mail-order wife Barbara Sanciprian] and I were introduced in the FORMAL Spanish tradition by mutual friends, and were married first in Cuba after 2 year courtship." - --Ken Pangborn, admitting that he began cheating on his wife Peggy on September 28, 2001, nearly two years before she separated from him "I'm David Moore and I am insane!" - --Ken Pangborn posting to alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, attempting to claim that his name is David Moore "If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk, but you will still be a cripple." - --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **, in a verbal threat to his girlfriend ** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic Keywords: false allegations,sexual abuse,marital rape, date rape, sexual harassment,child abuse,domestic violence,rape allegations,false allegations of child abuse,false rape allegations,false abuse accusations,false accusations,recovered memories,child sexual abuse,abuse child,sexual assault,child molestation,reactive attachment disorder,penile plethysmograph,polygraph,attorneys,divorce,visitation,pedophiles More-keywords: KRP CONSULTING. False allegations of child abuse, false abuse accusations, false domestic violence allegations help, false rape allegations, abuse child, sexual abuse, child sexual abuse, false allegations, false accusations, recovered memories, sexual assault, child molestation, child sexual abuse, reactive attachment disorder, penile plethysmograph, polygraph, trial consulting, jury consulting, jury selection, jury voire dire, wrongful allegations, false child sexual abuse allegations. Wrongful child sexual abuse allegations. Domestic Violence. Rape. Marital rape. Date Rape. Confidence Rape. Yet-more-keywords: ken pangborn,kenneth pangborn,barbara pangborn,barbara sanciprian,palm harbor,tampa,attorneys,florida lawyers,florida attorneys,tampa lawyers,tampa attorneys,trial consultant,trial consulting,dui,domestic violence,vawa,abuse,3648 cockatoo,new port richey,ernesto sanciprian,ernesto miguel blanco sanciprian,blanco sanciprian,bryce carter,holguin,julio aguilar,yudith bacallao,raimundo cabrera,ana hernandez chi,lixandro cordero,leandis diaz,al faisbuker,wendy gil,armando capo ramos,george riveron,reinaldo rodriguez,lexis ross,liana yisell alvarez silveira,madelyn tamayo,manuel toledo,thais valdes Extra-keywords: Julito Sainz,craig clawson,lia yisell On Mar 18, 12:01 am, freedom <aboutKRP...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > He probably would. He seems to have a very condescending attitude toward > ALL women. Actually in a post in the last 24 hours in response to me he damn near DID say that. Lovely father, huh? > Did you know that his daughter was involved in the adult film industry? > And, Ken humiliated her by posting her stage name to usenet? From what I understand women who get involved in the adult film industry start naively thinking they can make a lot of money from the bet go. They find out that to the industry they are nothing more than fresh meat to be used up and cast aside. For Ken to have a daughter in the porn industry doesn't say much for how he raised her. As in prostitution, some women go into video porn because of how they were sexually abused. Ken doesn't strike me as much of a father, to be honest. > http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com > The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex [quoted text clipped - 63 lines] > =1FUT > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Moe Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan " A vampire cop? REALLY?" "http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm > Mike: Why is it that you posted widely that you didn't find > Ken using EBSCO but then you posted ONLY in alt.adoption [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > him. > Evidently nobody wants to publish it and is quite old. We've been thru this before, Mike. kenny boy summarized the information from a few studies into one. He did no research personally. > Pangborn, K. (1980). Children at Risk: Summary of Findings & > Recommendations from a Study of Federally Funded Child Abuse & [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Mike D. > Mike: Why is it that you posted widely that you didn't find > Ken using EBSCO but then you posted ONLY in alt.adoption > that you found one hit for Ken? > > Does your EBSCO search cover INTERNATIONAL > publications? > Why did you badmouth what you did find as if > it was "vanity press" junk when it was in fact > produced at the request of government? > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.adoption/msg/f32849f6b61759c4?hl=e... > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > a review of other research. His publication is available only from > him.Evidently nobody wants to publish it and is quite old. What was gthe name of *MY* publishing company then?? DS> We've been thru this before, Mike. Maybe 30 or 40 times in the past 3 years. DS> kenny boy summarized the information from a few studies into one. He did no research personally. Not quite accurate Danny. Not EVEN accurate at all. We took the data from the available states, broke them out, compiled them and subjected them to analysis. Using a computer to compare the demographic data. A little more than a CASUAL SUMMARY as YOU - who wasn't dere Charlie - want to FALSELY CLAIM. Tell me asswipe. What have YOU ever written/ Even self published? When have YOU ever done even a SUMMARFY of anything but the number of sheets on a roll of toilet paper on your NAPPER CRAPPER, Danny/ When have YOU - EVER been asked by ANY branch of government to do ANYTHING for them? Whhen have YOU been invited to testify before Congress on ANYTHING including your own abundant flatulence? Whan have YOU - - the GREAT DAN SULLIVAN been interviewed and quoted by ANY Newspaper including the weekly shopper, Danny? Like WHO ARE YOU other than a jealous little TOAD? > Pangborn, K. (1980). Children at Risk: Summary of Findings & > Recommendations from a Study of Federally Funded Child Abuse & Neglect > Treatment Projects. Children at Risk: Summary of Findings & > Recommendations > from a Study of Federally Funded Child Abuse & Neglect Treatment > Projects, Retrieved March 9, 2009, from SocINDEX with Full Text database. Danny tell us about all of YOUR great writings and academic work????? WHAT have YOU done, beside be INSANELY JEALOUS of me? What fukkking accomplishment do you have in life aside from being a STUPID PUNK? Where is all YOUR GREAT WORK in the Library of Congress? Your problem, Sullivan is that you are a ZERO in life. No contributions at all other than your bellowing bullshit on Usenet. NADA! ZIP! ZILCH! Sullivan you are a NOTHING and the ONLY thing you can do is to TRY to tear down the work of people who HAVE done something. Mikey is a "TRUE BELIEVER" semi-religious fanatic. He's not gonna like me because TO HIM - I am the ENEMY - "SATAN." So he has to try to destroy me. It's his Christian belief system. Buy YOU - Danny, by ANY objective standard you have inscribed on your forehead "FAILURE" because in all the years of your life you are a NOTHING! You have not contributed anything POSITIVE to society. ALL you have, ALL of what you have is your bullshit on Usenet. That's ALL there is to you. >> Mike: Why is it that you posted widely that you didn't find >> Ken using EBSCO but then you posted ONLY in alt.adoption [quoted text clipped - 68 lines] > to society. ALL you have, ALL of what you have is your bullshit on Usenet. > That's ALL there is to you. Here we go again, typical abuser behavior. You can't prove your position so you attack other who exposed you. Am I biased? YOU BET!!!! I am biased against abuse and abusers. I want to help women and children avoid abuse. How much do I make doing this? I have NEVER made a profit. What is your motivation? MD > Here we go again, typical abuser behavior. Is this what Jesus would do? MD > You can't prove your position MD > so you attack other who exposed you. MD > MD > Am I biased? YOU BET!!!! I am biased MD > against abuse and abusers. I want MD > to help women and children avoid abuse. And to hell with men or keeping families whole? Even if you have to "bear false witness" about stats to exaggerate your personal crusade? MD > How much do I make doing this? I MD > have NEVER made a profit. MD > What is your motivation? Tell us about your ministry. You took a vow of poverty? What's your degree program all about there in Joplin? How many years along are you? MD > Here we go again, typical abuser behavior. GH> Is this what Jesus would do? Of course not! What did he say about CASTING STONES??? Mike didn't get that part. MD > You can't prove your position MD > so you attack other who exposed you. MD > MD > Am I biased? YOU BET!!!! I am biased MD > against abuse and abusers. I want MD > to help women and children avoid abuse. GH> And to hell with men or keeping families whole? GH> Even if you have to "bear false witness" about GH> stats to exaggerate your personal crusade? You are NOT suggesting "FALSE WITNESS" are you Greg? MIKE???? NEVER!!! He's INFALLIBLE. In fact Mikle taught Jesus the walking on water trick. MD > How much do I make doing this? I MD > have NEVER made a profit. MD > What is your motivation? GH> Tell us about your ministry. You took a vow of poverty? Yes, Mike sees this as his "MINISTRY" his "CALLING" for the Lord. Of course he doesn't see his OWN "abuser" behavior. > MD > Here we go again, typical abuser behavior. > > GH> Is this what Jesus would do? > > Of course not! What did he say about CASTING STONES??? Mike didn't get > that part. Who is casting stones, that is, executing sentencing? All I am doing is exposing abusive behavior typical of abusers. > MD > You can't prove your position > MD > so you attack other who exposed you. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > GH> Even if you have to "bear false witness" about > GH> stats to exaggerate your personal crusade? Excuse me? What exaggeration? Maybe you don't think it is wrong that an estimated 1 in 3 girls and 1 in 5 boys will be sexually assaulted before reaching age 18? Even the modest estimate of 1 in 5 girls and 1 in 7 boys is way too high! An estimated 1 in 4 female college residents experience sexual abuse while in college. Maybe I should ignore this? > You are NOT suggesting "FALSE WITNESS" are you Greg? MIKE???? NEVER!!! > He's INFALLIBLE. In fact Mikle taught Jesus the walking on water trick. Again, typical abuser tactics. > MD > How much do I make doing this? I > MD > have NEVER made a profit. > MD > What is your motivation? > > GH> Tell us about your ministry. You took a vow of poverty? Can you show me a vow of poverty requirement in the Bible? A vow of poverty is an invention of the Roman Catholic Cult. My ministry is to give women and children the power to escape abuse, to help survivors become victors, and to help organizations dealing with children implement effective child protection strategies. So what do you see wrong with this? > Yes, Mike sees this as his "MINISTRY" his "CALLING" for the Lord. Of > course he doesn't see his OWN "abuser" behavior. Describe my abuser behavior. You make false statement attributed to me. You refuse to give simple information to support your claims of journal publication. Your claimed government sponsored research is illegally not publicly published and available. Your defense is limited to an offense against those challenge you to prove your claims of publication in journals. This is typical abuser diversion. >> MD > Here we go again, typical abuser behavior. >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> get >> that part. > Who is casting stones, that is, executing sentencing? All I am doing is > exposing abusive behavior typical of abusers. And the mob told Jesus that all THEY were doing was stoning an adultress, >> MD > You can't prove your position >> MD > so you attack other who exposed you. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >> GH> Even if you have to "bear false witness" about >> GH> stats to exaggerate your personal crusade? > Excuse me? What exaggeration? Maybe you don't think it is wrong that an > estimated 1 in 3 girls and 1 in 5 boys will be sexually assaulted before > reaching age 18? Even the modest estimate of 1 in 5 girls and 1 in 7 boys > is way too high! An estimated 1 in 4 female college residents experience > sexual abuse while in college. Maybe I should ignore this? The every 46 seconds a women is being raped. >> You are NOT suggesting "FALSE WITNESS" are you Greg? MIKE???? >> NEVER!!! >> He's INFALLIBLE. In fact Mike taught Jesus the walking on water trick. > Again, typical abuser tactics. Yeah right, you are so HOLIER THEN THOU! >> MD > How much do I make doing this? I >> MD > have NEVER made a profit. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > effective child protection strategies. So what do you see wrong with > this? Yeah where Jesus told the apostles to not take purse or script with them as they preached. >> Yes, Mike sees this as his "MINISTRY" his "CALLING" for the Lord. Of >> course he doesn't see his OWN "abuser" behavior. > Describe my abuser behavior. You make false statement attributed to me. > You refuse to give simple information to support your claims of journal > publication. Your claimed government sponsored research is illegally not > publicly published and available. Your defense is limited to an offense > against those challenge you to prove your claims of publication in > journals. This is typical abuser diversion. I just QUOTE you verbatim Mike. And I comment on your sanctimony. NOW quote from my article since you CLAIM to have read it. >>> MD > Here we go again, typical abuser behavior. >>> [quoted text clipped - 67 lines] > I just QUOTE you verbatim Mike. And I comment on your sanctimony. NOW > quote from my article since you CLAIM to have read it. I never claimed to have read what doesn't exist. I claimed you have no article published in any journal found on EBSCO or ProQuest. You also do NOT quote anything that makes me an abuser. Why do you refuse to prove any of your claims? >>>> MD > Here we go again, typical abuser behavior. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 79 lines] > any > of your claims? Funny thing Mike. You make that claim LOUDLY in ASCPS, and ADRU, and YET in Alt.Adoption you claim you found ONE. PICK A LANE Mike. Is it one or none? If it is NONE, why did you list one in the adoption newsgroup? Which is it? One face for one place, another for the other? Mike, Could you please explain why you posted that Ken had no hits on EBSCO when you had posted just 57 minutes earlier that he had one hit on EBSCO? What's that disclaimer on the EBSCO site? Why won't you post it Mike? >>> Mike: Why is it that you posted widely that you didn't find >>> Ken using EBSCO but then you posted ONLY in alt.adoption [quoted text clipped - 82 lines] >> on Usenet. >> That's ALL there is to you. > Here we go again, typical abuser behavior. You can't prove your position > so you attack other who exposed you. I can't prove MY position? You stumble all over yourself. One place saying you could only find ONE article I wrote (BOOK) and then in another "SWEARING" that there is nothing listed. I have given you way more of the benefit of the doubty on this than you deserve. Which is it, ONE or NONE? Pick a lane Mike? ONE OR NONE? Have you ever bothered to READ EBSCO'S disclaimer on their database? ONLY YOY claim it is all inclusive and infallible. THEY do NOT! > Am I biased? YOU BET!!!! I am biased against abuse and abusers. I want > to help women and children avoid abuse. How much do I make doing this? I > have NEVER made a profit. What is your motivation? You are a Christian fundamentalist extremist Mike. You see bogeymen (SATAN) where he doesn't exist. In MY OPINION he has his hands on YOUR throat. I have YET to find a "Fundie" that I found to be completely honest. They are absolutists. They TRY to warp God's word to their own prejudices, which is why for hundreds of years they PREACHED that Slavery was ordained by GOD. I could go on. In this case you are a "TRUE BELIEVER" and there is only ONE true path. YOURS!!!! Mike - here's a FACT. While YOU don't do what you do for MONEY, do DO it for something VASTLY more evil. Imposing your will on others. I, of course, work to help the WRONGLY ACCUSED (you don't believe there are any such people) and do it for money. Which of the two of us is more honest? I don't hide what I do, my motives and the rest. YOU DO! You are DESPERATE to try to find something to convince YOURSELF (and THAT is what this is REALLY all about) that I am EVIL INCARNATE. You MUST believe it, or you'd have to look at your whole belief system and you can't do that. With your C*H*R*I*S*T*I*A*N belief system - there is ONLY ONE TRUE PATH - that's the one YOU are on. It's the one YOU PREACH! Can we say A-MEN? Praise JEEEEEEEEEZUZZZZ! Hallelujah! What do you think you "EXPOSED" Mike? You can't even make up your mind. None or one? One or none? Pick a lane, Mike. >>>> Mike: Why is it that you posted widely that you didn't find >>>> Ken using EBSCO but then you posted ONLY in alt.adoption [quoted text clipped - 93 lines] > disclaimer on their database? ONLY YOY claim it is all inclusive and > infallible. THEY do NOT! You call a "government sponsored report" of 38 pages a book? If it was indeed government sponsored it would be publicly available and NOT just self-published. You still refuse to identify the mysterious journals you have articles published in. They can't be found and you refuse to identify the journal and date published. >> Am I biased? YOU BET!!!! I am biased against abuse and abusers. I want >> to help women and children avoid abuse. How much do I make doing this? I [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > work to help the WRONGLY ACCUSED (you don't believe there are any such > people) and do it for money. You are imposing YOUR twisted agenda on us. You defend abusers and mock those who want to stop abuse. Which of the two of us is more honest? I don't > hide what I do, my motives and the rest. YOU DO! You are DESPERATE to try to > find something to convince YOURSELF (and THAT is what this is REALLY all > about) that I am EVIL INCARNATE. You MUST believe it, or you'd have to look > at your whole belief system and you can't do that. If you don't hide what you do, give us the journal and date of your publications. Government research on social issues is subject to OPEN PUBLICATION! Maybe we should sue you and the government agency that "hired" you to make this research public! > With your C*H*R*I*S*T*I*A*N belief system - there is ONLY ONE TRUE > PATH - that's the one YOU are on. It's the one YOU PREACH! Can we say A-MEN? > Praise JEEEEEEEEEZUZZZZ! Hallelujah! > > What do you think you "EXPOSED" Mike? You can't even make up your mind. > None or one? One or none? Pick a lane, Mike. YOU are openly making false accusations against me. YOU are the one who refuses to give simple evidence of your journal publications. YOU are the one using typical abuser tactics. >>>>> Mike: Why is it that you posted widely that you didn't find >>>>> Ken using EBSCO but then you posted ONLY in alt.adoption [quoted text clipped - 111 lines] > identify > the journal and date published. NAME THE PUBLISHER MIKEY! Since now you are claiming to have READ it. >>> Am I biased? YOU BET!!!! I am biased against abuse and abusers. I >>> want [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >> work to help the WRONGLY ACCUSED (you don't believe there are any such >> people) and do it for money. > You are imposing YOUR twisted agenda on us. You defend abusers and mock > those who want to stop abuse. You KN OW that we defend the GUILTY, Mike? HOW??? Name your source. Name the GUILTY people we have defended. By your statements you claim you CAN. Let's see it Mike. NAME THEM. > Which of the two of us is more honest? I don't >> hide what I do, my motives and the rest. YOU DO! You are DESPERATE to try [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> look >> at your whole belief system and you can't do that. > If you don't hide what you do, give us the journal and date of your > publications. Government research on social issues is subject to OPEN > PUBLICATION! Maybe we should sue you and the government agency that > "hired" you to make this research public! BY all means SUE Mike. It was the Utah legislature's judiciary committee. I am CERFTAIN the state of Utah will be THRILLED for you to file your MILTI-BILLION dollar lawsxuit. >> With your C*H*R*I*S*T*I*A*N belief system - there is ONLY ONE >> TRUE >> PATH - that's the one YOU are on. It's the one YOU PREACH! Can we say >> A-MEN? >> Praise JEEEEEEEEEZUZZZZ! Hallelujah! >> What do you think you "EXPOSED" Mike? You can't even make up your >> mind. >> None or one? One or none? Pick a lane, Mike. > YOU are openly making false accusations against me. YOU are the one who > refuses to give simple evidence of your journal publications. YOU are the > one using typical abuser tactics. What accusations? That this whole child saving routine is your "MINISTRY?" Do you deny it??? >>>>>> Mike: Why is it that you posted widely that you didn't find >>>>>> Ken using EBSCO but then you posted ONLY in alt.adoption [quoted text clipped - 113 lines] > > NAME THE PUBLISHER MIKEY! Since now you are claiming to have READ ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? >>>> Am I biased? YOU BET!!!! I am biased against abuse and abusers. I >>>> want [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Name the GUILTY people we have defended. By your statements you claim you > CAN. Let's see it Mike. NAME THEM. You discredit victims. You claim they are liars. >> Which of the two of us is more honest? I don't >>> hide what I do, my motives and the rest. YOU DO! You are DESPERATE to try [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > am CERFTAIN the state of Utah will be THRILLED for you to file your > MILTI-BILLION dollar lawsxuit. Okay, now we have a source. Let's see if they acknowledge you. >>> With your C*H*R*I*S*T*I*A*N belief system - there is ONLY ONE >>> TRUE [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > What accusations? That this whole child saving routine is your > "MINISTRY?" Do you deny it??? No, I do not deny wanting to protect children from abusers. Why are you condemning saving children from abuse? >>>>>>> Mike: Why is it that you posted widely that you didn't find >>>>>>> Ken using EBSCO but then you posted ONLY in alt.adoption [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] >>>>>> He did >>>>>> no research personally. >>>>>> Not quite accurate Danny. Not EVEN accurate at all. We took the >>>>>> data [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >>>>>> more than a CASUAL SUMMARY as YOU - who wasn't dere Charlie - want to >>>>>> FALSELY CLAIM. >>>>>> Tell me asswipe. What have YOU ever written/ Even self published? >>>>>> When [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >>>>>> interviewed and quoted by ANY Newspaper including the weekly shopper, >>>>>> Danny? Like WHO ARE YOU other than a jealous little TOAD? >>>>>>> Pangborn, K. (1980). Children at Risk: Summary of Findings & >>>>>>> Recommendations from a Study of Federally Funded Child Abuse & [quoted text clipped - 60 lines] >>> identify >>> the journal and date published. >> NAME THE PUBLISHER MIKE! Since now you are claiming to have READ > ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? You claim to have the INFO, Mike. SHiuld be NO problem naming WHO the publisher is. Does it state "KEN PANGBORN COMPANY?" >>>>> Am I biased? YOU BET!!!! I am biased against abuse and abusers. I >>>>> want [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] >>> You are imposing YOUR twisted agenda on us. You defend abusers and mock >>> those who want to stop abuse. >> You KNOW that we defend the GUILTY, Mike? HOW??? Name your source. >> Name the GUILTY people we have defended. By your statements you claim you >> CAN. Let's see it Mike. NAME THEM. > You discredit victims. You claim they are liars. WHERE did I SAY that Mike? You say I said it. WHERE IS IT? Look out Mike, YOUR credibilkity is in the same toilet bowl as Sullivan's. PUT UP. >>> Which of the two of us is more honest? I don't >>>> hide what I do, my motives and the rest. YOU DO! You are DESPERATE to [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >>>> look >>>> at your whole belief system and you can't do that. >>> If you don't hide what you do, give us the journal and date of your >>> publications. Government research on social issues is subject to OPEN >>> PUBLICATION! Maybe we should sue you and the government agency that >>> "hired" you to make this research public! >> BY all means SUE Mike. It was the Utah legislature's judiciary committee. >> I >> am CERFTAIN the state of Utah will be THRILLED for you to file your >> MILTI-BILLION dollar lawsxuit. > Okay, now we have a source. Let's see if they acknowledge you. CALL AND ASK Mike. Do you think anyone will remember that far back? >>>> With your C*H*R*I*S*T*I*A*N belief system - there is ONLY ONE >>>> TRUE PATH - that's the one YOU are on. It's the one YOU PREACH! Can we >>>> say >>>> A-MEN? Praise JEEEEEEEEEZUZZZZ! Hallelujah! >>>> What do you think you "EXPOSED" Mike? You can't even make up your >>>> mind. >>>> None or one? One or none? Pick a lane, Mike. >>> YOU are openly making false accusations against me. YOU are the one who >>> refuses to give simple evidence of your journal publications. YOU are >>> the >>> one using typical abuser tactics. >> What accusations? That this whole child saving routine is your >> "MINISTRY?" Do you deny it??? > No, I do not deny wanting to protect children from abusers. Why are you > condemning saving children from abuse? I'm NOT except in your SICK mind. Gotta tell you Mike - with over 30 years in this field. 90% of the time, in my experience, people like YOU have turned out to be the REAL abusers. Oh I can remember a CRUSADING Judge in Indiana who BELLOWED much of the same bullshit you do. He created the CASA program in Indiana. He was the HERO to all TRUE BELIEVERS, that is until his secretary walked in to catch him in the act of getting a blow job by a 10 year old boy who was staying at the attached juvenile detention center. He had been "CHECKING OUT" young boys for his "interventions" for years. Or we could discuss, if you like, a Detective in the "Crimes Against Children unit" of the Pinellas County, Florida Sheriff's Department who was a firebrand CHRISTIAN fanatic, much like you, against Child Pornography until he was BUSTED by the FBI as one of America's biggest kiddie porn traffickers. Oh YEAH, Mike I listen to the sh.t you say and all your LOUD self-righteousness (PRAISE JEEEEZUZZ) and wonder. No Mike - I by NO means approve of the abuse of children, and we do NOT, as YOU claim, defend the abusers. We defend the WRONGLY accused. And we have ways of KNOWING they are wrongly accused. Now - Mike - let's have you QUOTE from the TEXT of my article. I'll wait. Sullivan is crashing on the rocks. You are right behind him. Mike, Are you some idealogue retard or what? > Mike, Are you some idealogue retard or what? This from the guy who was convicted of OWI! Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON (DOB 05/22/1959) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 2 SPEED Disposition Status GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT "That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!" Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so stupid he thinks I'm Asian. MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/395db830731df54a http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead " ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would address the most pressing problems of our day. ... " April 2000, Gregory Hanson http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson TWO of Kent Wills' usenet newsgroup identities: http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=5zmbTBIAAADOJ684KS60nUaU_ zmlHzoM8rhlH0Pnl47z4AZhN98BFg compu...@yahoo.com http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=tO2J8xIAAAD-FV_7I-6E0Mcpe oqRe5_P8rhlH0Pnl47z4AZhN98BFg compu...@gmail.com http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/8edd11c aa03c4f37?hl=en&dmode=source Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services, misc.legal, soc.men, alt.support.foster-parents, alt.adoption From: "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:06:14 -0600 KW > Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON KW > (DOB 05/22/1959) KW > CRIMINAL COMPLAINT KW > 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST Kent posted a FRAUD that I had an OWI (Drunk Driving). I've only tried to get drunk once in my entire life. Except for that and a few Rum/Pepsi (social drinks) I do not drink alcohol. Of course, I never had any accusation, charge or conviction for OWI. Like your Vodka there comrade Willenski? http://www.public-records-now.com/Search/SearchResults.aspx?vw=people&input=name &fn=Kent&mn=&ln=Wills&city=&state=AR&criteria=Kent;;;;Wills;;;;AR;;;;;; WILLS, KENT B [ Collected March 7, 2009] Age: 40 Rogers, AR Ankeny, IA Marshalltown, IA Bartlett, IL Villa Park, IL And from another source: Hanover Park, IL WILLS, FREDERICK ALFRED (Kent's Dad) WILLS, MICHAEL A (Kent's son??) WILLS, JANET RAE (Kent's Mom) HARTWIG,TIFFANY JEANNE (Kent's sister AKA Tiffany J Wills) From another source: Kelly M Wills Kent's wife ?? ) Pay close attention to past owners of 202 NW College Ave. Kent made affirmative claims about the property online. Kent's folks sold it in 1994 and he lived there! GeoParcel 8024-15-452-029 District/Parcel 181/00392-048-000 http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/protest/pickdpP.cgi?dp18100392048000=1&r eport=WebPublic&fixed=N&sketch=Y&map=Y&photo=Y& [ As Collected March 7, 2009 ] Seller: WILLS, FRED A. & JANET R. Buyer: THE SWEENEY REVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST 04/26/1994 135,000 D/Deed 7010/188 - Seller: SHELDAHL, ERIC A. Buyer: WILLS, FRED 01/02/1990 130,500 D/Deed 6189/972 A Larger photo: http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/seephoto/photosize.cgi?gp=802415452029&s ize=Large Do It Yourself Instructions to look up Kent's record Iowa Department of Corrections records for Kent http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768 Name Kent Bradley Wills [ As Collected March 7, 2009 ] Offender Number 1155768 Sex M Birth Date 01/08/1969 Age 40 Location Offense County Of Commitment Commitment Date Duration TDD/SDD * * TDD = Tentative Discharge Date * SDD = Supervision Discharge Date Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 12/16/2008 Probation C Felony Polk 12/16/2008 Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 11/25/2003 Iowa Courts Docket and Disposition web site http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ Iowa Courts Online Search < Start A Case Search Here! > click Iowa Courts Online Search Search Selection Under Trial Court < click on Case Search > Wills Kent B 02401 ESPR015146 INA J WILLS ESTATE 05771 FECR145250 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969 05771 FECR176876 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969 05771 SCSC310505 SWEENEY RENTALS VS KENT 05771 SCSC335210 CITI FINANCIAL VS KENT 05771 SCSC374163 SFI F SCHERLE PRES VS KENT 05771 SCSC374164 SFI F SCHERLE III PRES VS KENT 05771 STAN201670 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969 05771 STAN210929 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969 05771 SWCR177169 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969 A list of case numbers will be presented. Two on that list have the code "FE" in them. One of the two ends in the two digits "76". Click that case number. A case caption will appear. Tabs available to the public include "Criminal Charges", "Filings" and "Financial". Use the "back" button on your browser to move among them or just hit the various tab buttons. (See filings text if attached further down below) IN PRINTED LAW BOOKS West's North Western Reporter Second Series A Unit of the National Reporter System Volume 696 N.W.2d Cite as 696 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 2005) Kent's Appeal http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.a sp?Printable=true http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04 -0202&invol=1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 31 / 04-0202 Filed May 6, 2005 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. KENT BRADLEY WILLS, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael D. Huppert, Judge. Defendant appeals claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. AFFIRMED. Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender, and Tricia Johnston, Assistant State Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin Cmelik, Assistant Attorney General, John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee. WIGGINS, Justice. Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary contending that an attached garage is a separate occupied structure from that of the living quarters of the residence. In this appeal, we must determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for (1) failing to move for judgment of acquittal on the basis there was insufficient evidence to convict Wills of second-degree burglary when he entered an attached garage of a residence when no persons were present in the garage, but when persons were present in the living quarters; and (2) failing to object to a jury instruction based on this same argument. Because we find there was no legal basis for the motion for judgment of acquittal or the objection to the jury instruction, Wills' trial counsel was not ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. I. Background Facts and Proceedings. Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called the local police to report that a car alarm sounded in the resident's neighborhood. The city dispatched a police officer to the location. Observing nothing unusual, the officer left the area, only to be stopped a couple of blocks later by a person who informed the officer he had witnessed someone running from the area of the car alarm. As the officer started driving back to the area of the car alarm, he noticed a person walking on the sidewalk. The officer asked the person, a minor, if he had noticed anybody running from the area. The minor answered that he had not. While the officer and another officer were speaking to the minor, another resident of the neighborhood arrived in her car and informed the officers that she had observed two people, one of whom was heavy set with a blinking light on his back pocket, walking in the area of her neighbor's residence. She observed the heavier-set individual, later identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's attached garage through an unlocked service door. She further observed a smaller individual standing by a van parked in the neighbor's driveway. The officers eventually let the minor leave even though they found a large amount of coins, a flashlight, and an electronic pocket organizer in his pockets. After releasing the minor, the police officers drove to the residence where the neighbor observed the two suspicious people and woke the owner. The owner, his wife, and two daughters were in the residence sleeping at the time. After a search of his vehicles, the owner discovered change and an electronic pocket organizer were missing from the vehicles. The owner's daughter reported a diamond ring and some change were missing from her vehicle. The officers then contacted the minor's parents, who informed the officers the minor was with Wills. After the officers questioned the minor again, he admitted his involvement in the theft and implicated Wills in the burglary. Although Wills denied involvement in the burglary, the officers arrested him. The State filed a trial information charging Wills with second-degree burglary. The State later amended the information to include two additional charges of burglary in the third degree and using a juvenile to commit an indictable offense. The jury returned a verdict finding Wills guilty of the crimes of burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, and using a juvenile to commit an indictable offense. Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. II. Scope of Review. Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are derived from the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674, 691-93 (1984). Our review for a claim involving violations of the Constitution is de novo. State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100 (Iowa 2004). We normally preserve ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims for postconviction relief actions. State v. Carter, 602 N.W. 2d 818, 820 (Iowa 1999). However, we will address such claims on direct appeal when the record is sufficient to permit a ruling. State v. Artzer, 609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The appellate record in the present case is sufficient to allow us to address Wills' ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims on direct appeal. In order for a defendant to succeed on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant must prove: (1) counsel failed to perform an essential duty and (2) prejudice resulted. Id. Prejudice results when "there is a reasonable probability that, but for the counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378 (Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068, 80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills' arguments also raise issues of statutory interpretation, which we review for correction of errors at law. State v. Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004). III. Analysis. To find Wills guilty of burglary in the second degree, the State had to prove Wills perpetrated a burglary "in or upon an occupied structure in which one or more persons are present . . . ." Iowa Code § 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added). In this appeal, Wills first contends his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move for a judgment of acquittal on the basis there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the time Wills entered the garage, there were persons present in or upon the occupied structure. Wills concedes the garage was an occupied structure, but argues the living quarters and the attached garage are separate and independent occupied structures; therefore, the jury could not have found there were people present in the attached garage at the time of the burglary. The Code defines an "occupied structure" as: [A]ny building, structure, appurtenances to buildings and structures, land, water or air vehicle, or similar place adapted for overnight accommodation of persons, or occupied by persons for the purpose of carrying on business or other activity therein, or for the storage or safekeeping of anything of value. Such a structure is an "occupied structure" whether or not a person is actually present. Id. § 702.12. Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590 N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to argue the garage and the living quarters are separate and independent occupied structures. In Smothers, two separate and distinct businesses connected by interior fire doors were operated in the same structure. 590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant committed two burglaries by entering each business because "[t]he facility's construction history and physical make-up demonstrate that the portions are independent working units which constitute '[a] combination of materials to form a construction for occupancy [or] use.'" Id. Smothers is not at odds with the present case because the living quarters and the garage are not separate or independent units of the residence. Our review of the record reveals the garage in question was a three-car attached garage separated from the living quarters by a door. The same roof covered the garage as the rest of the residence. The living quarters surrounded the garage on two sides. It was structurally no different from any other room in the residence. The garage was a functional part of the residence. On the night of the incident, the door was unlocked. The owner of the residence used two stalls in the garage to park the family vehicles. The owner used the third stall for his motorcycle. As such, the garage and the living quarters are a single "structure" or "building" functioning as an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence including the garage is a single "occupied structure" under section 702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App.1995) (holding defendant's entry into an attached garage constituted first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house; therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary of an inhabited dwelling house); People v. Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994) (holding "ordinarily an attached garage is a 'dwelling' because it is part of the structure in which the owner or occupant lives"); State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53 (N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding "burglary of the [attached] garage was burglary of the dwelling house because the garage was a part of the structure used as living quarters"); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d 760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988) (holding "[s]ince the garage in the present case was structurally part of a building which was used for overnight lodging of various persons, it must be considered as part of a dwelling"); White v. State, 630 S.W. 2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982) (holding an attached garage under the same roof as the home would be considered a habitation within the purview of the penal code because the garage is a structure appurtenant to and connected to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P. 2d 551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993) (holding the definition of a dwelling under Washington's burglary statute included an attached garage). Had Wills' trial counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal on the basis there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the time Wills entered the garage there were no persons present in or upon the occupied structure, it would have been overruled by the court because the owner and his family were present in the residence at the time of the burglary. Wills also claims his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the jury instruction used by the district court on the same ground; that the living quarters were a separate and independent occupied structure from the attached garage. The instruction as given stated: The State must prove all of the following elements of Burglary in the Second Degree as to Count I: 1. On or about the 12th day of August, 2003, the defendant or someone he aided and abetted broke into or entered the residence at . . . . 2. The residence at . . . was an occupied structure as defined in Instruction No. 29. 3. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did not have permission or authority to break into the residence at ... 4. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did so with the specific intent to commit a theft therein. 5. During the incident persons were present in or upon the occupied structure. If the State has proved all of the elements, the defendant is guilty of Burglary in the Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove any of the elements, the defendant is not guilty of Burglary in the Second Degree and you will then consider the charge of Attempted Burglary in the Second Degree explained in Instruction No. 21. (Emphasis added.) Wills' claim is without merit. As we have discussed, the residence is the one and only "occupied structure" under the facts of this case. Had Wills' trial counsel made this objection to the instruction, it would have been overruled. Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not ineffective for failing to move for a judgment of acquittal or objecting to the instruction because there was no legal basis for the motion or objection. See State v. Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234, 238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise an issue that has no merit). IV. Disposition. We affirm the judgment of the district court because Wills' trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise meritless issues. AFFIRMED. ----------------------------------- [ As Collected March 7, 2009 ] Filings Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK) Citation Number: Event Filed By Filed Create Date Last Updated Action Date ORDER OF DISCHARGE OVROM ELIZA 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 Comments: FROM PROBATION OTHER EVENT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 Comments: FIELD DISCHARGE REPORT OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 Comments: REVOCATION HEARING SET FOR 1/07/2009 IS CANCELLED DEFENDANT HAS NOT PAID IN FULL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ORDER FOR PROBATION REVOCATION HEARING MOISAN CYNTHIA M 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 Comments: ON 1/7/09 AT 9:30AM RM204 PROBATION REVOCATION 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 Comments: REPORT OF VIOLATIONS FILED BY JAN HORNOCKER FORMAL PROBATION HUTCHISON ROBERT A 01/25/2006 01/26/2006 01/26/2006 Comments: EXTENDED TO 01/16/09 OR UNTIL CONDITIONS ARE MET COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/13/2006 01/13/2006 01/13/2006 OTHER ORDER HUTCHISON ROBERT A 01/11/2006 01/13/2006 01/13/2006 Comments: DEFT'S PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09; DEFT TO COMPLETE CONDITIONS LISTED OTHER EVENT 09/15/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005 Comments: THE SUPREME COURT RETURNED FILE, PSI, 4 TRANSCRIPTS, AND 1 ENVELOPE OF EXHIBITS OTHER EVENT APPELLATE DEFENDER'S OFFICE 06/09/2005 06/13/2005 06/13/2005 Comments: STATEMENT OF HOURS 15.9 HOURS = $795.00 ATTORNEY - GRETA TRUMAN OTHER EVENT CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 06/02/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005 Comments: BILL OF COSTS $27.50 TAXED AGAINST THE APPELLANT AND PAYABLE TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL #04-0202 OTHER ORDER SUPREME COURT OF IOWA 06/02/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005 Comments: RE DEFT'S APPEAL CLAIMING INEFFECTIVE COUNSEL: JUDGEMENT AFFIRMED #04-0202 PROCEDENDO CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 06/02/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005 Comments: AFFIRMED PROCEED W/DILIGENCE AS IF THERE HAD BEEN NO APPEAL #04-0202 COMMUNITY SERVICE 05/25/2004 05/27/2004 05/27/2004 Comments: 135 HRS COMPLETED 5/24/04 INDIGENT DEFENSE CLAIM FORM TAYLOR KAREN 05/11/2004 05/13/2004 05/13/2004 Comments: $1150 ELECTRONIC FILING OTHER EVENT 04/26/2004 04/28/2004 04/28/2004 Comments: SUPREME COURT REC'D 1 FILE, 1 PSI ENVELOPE, 1 EXHIBIT(1 ENVELOPE DATED 1/21/04) REC'D 4/20/04 OTHER ORDER NICKERSON DON 04/23/2004 04/27/2004 04/27/2004 Comments: THE BALANCE OF ATTNY FEE AND CC SHALL BE CONVERTED TO 135 HRS COMM SERVICE TO BE COMPLETED FROM FT DSM FACILITY OR TRANSFER TO INTERSTATE COMPACT COMMUNITY SERVICE 04/22/2004 04/23/2004 04/23/2004 Comments: 150 HRS COMPLETED APRIL 8, 2004 OTHER EVENT 04/20/2004 04/20/2004 04/20/2004 Comments: RECD CHANGE OF ADDRESS FOR DEFT OTHER EVENT 04/20/2004 04/20/2004 04/20/2004 Comments: FILE AND PSI SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT ONE ENVELOPE OF EXHIBITS FILED 1/21/04 SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT OTHER EVENT 04/19/2004 04/19/2004 04/19/2004 Comments: SUP CRT RECEIVED 2 TRANSCRIPTS OF PROCEEDINGS FILED 4/1/04 (VOL I & II) SUP CRT 04-202 OTHER EVENT 04/06/2004 05/18/2004 05/18/2004 Comments: 2 TRANSCRIPTS FILED 4/1/04 SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT MAXEY REBECCA 04/01/2004 04/05/2004 04/05/2004 Comments: OF PROCEEDINGS ON 12/16/03 VOLUME II DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT MAXEY REBECCA 04/01/2004 04/05/2004 04/05/2004 Comments: OF PROCEEDINGS ON 12/15/03 VOLUME I OTHER EVENT 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 Comments: EXHIBITS RETURNED OTHER EVENT 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 Comments: ENVELOPE OF EXHIBITS CHECKED OUT TO COURT REPORTER R.M. OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 03/29/2004 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 Comments: MOTION IS GRANTED REGARDING REVIEW OF PAYMENT OF COURT APPOINTED ATTY FEES AND THE STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER IS ORDERED TO MAKE PAYMENT AS REQUESTED. OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 03/29/2004 03/30/2004 03/31/2004 ENTERED IN ERROR Comments: STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER SHALL MAKE PAYMENT AS REQUESTED. MOTION 03/18/2004 03/19/2004 03/19/2004 Comments: TO ENLARGE TIME FOR DOCKETING FILED BY ASSISTANT APPELLATE DEFENDER ORDER SETTING HEARING OVROM ELIZA 03/15/2004 03/16/2004 03/16/2004 Comments: ON MOTION TO REVIEW ACTION RE:PAYMENT OF COURT APPOINTED ATTY. 3/29/04 8:15AM RM209A MOTION 03/15/2004 03/16/2004 03/16/2004 Comments: FOR REVIEW OF ACTION REGARDING PAYMENT OF COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY FEES FILED BY ATDF OTHER EVENT 03/11/2004 03/11/2004 03/11/2004 Comments: SUPREME COURT RECVD 2 TRANSCRIPTS OF SENTENCING ON 1/16/04 AND STATUS CONF ON 12/12/03 FILED 3/1/04 04-202 OTHER EVENT 03/09/2004 03/09/2004 03/09/2004 Comments: 2 TRANSCRIPTS FILED 3/1/04 SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE CLAIM FORM TAYLOR KAREN 03/09/2004 03/18/2004 03/18/2004 Comments: $1350.00 ELECTRONIC FILING DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 03/01/2004 03/03/2004 03/03/2004 Comments: OF STATUS CONFERENCE ON 12/12/2003 DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 03/01/2004 03/03/2004 03/03/2004 Comments: OF SENTENCING ON 01/16/2004 OTHER EVENT APPELLATE DEFENDER'S OFFICE 02/26/2004 02/27/2004 02/27/2004 Comments: COMBINED CERTIFICATE OTHER EVENT 02/24/2004 02/24/2004 02/24/2004 Comments: DOCKET ENTRIES RECEIVED BY SUPREME COURT 2-10-04; SUPREME COURT NUMBER 04-202 ORDER APPOINTING OVROM ELIZA 02/18/2004 02/19/2004 02/19/2004 Comments: ORDER GRANTING K TAYLOR TO W/D APPELLATE COUNSEL IS APPT OTHER APPLICATION 02/18/2004 02/19/2004 02/19/2004 Comments: TO WITHDRAW OTHER EVENT 02/10/2004 02/10/2004 02/10/2004 Comments: DOCKET ENTRIES AND CERTIFIED COPY OF NOTICE OF APPEAL SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT OTHER EVENT TAYLOR KAREN A 02/09/2004 02/10/2004 02/10/2004 Comments: COURT APPOINTED BILLING 47 HOURS = $2500 OTHER EVENT TAYLOR KAREN 02/09/2004 02/10/2004 02/10/2004 ENTERED IN ERROR Comments: COURT NOTICE OF APPEAL TAYLOR KAREN A 02/06/2004 02/09/2004 02/09/2004 Comments: FILED BY ATDF OTHER EVENT 01/23/2004 01/27/2004 01/27/2004 Comments: ADDENDUM TO PSI REPORT EXHIBIT MAXEY REBECCA 01/21/2004 01/21/2004 01/21/2004 Comments: STATE'S EXHIBITS 1-$13.21; 2-$24.25 (IN VAULT); 3-LIGHT; 4&5-WRITTEN STATEMENT; 6,7,8-DIAGRAM 1 ENVELOPE & VAULT OTHER EVENT 01/20/2004 01/26/2004 01/26/2004 Comments: VORP VICTIM DOES NOT WANT TO VORP NO RESTITUTION ISSUES AT THIS TIME VICTIM DENNIS AND JAMIE WIEBEN COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/20/2004 01/20/2004 01/20/2004 COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 01/16/2004 01/20/2004 01/20/2004 Comments: $15.00 PRE SENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT PSI 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 ORDER OF DISPOSITION OVROM ELIZA 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 Comments: FOUND GUILTY BY JURY/PRISON-SUSPENDED; FORMAL PROBATION; FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS; COMMUNITY SERVED; RESTITUTION-SUPP ORDER TO FOLLOW; VORP; APPEAL BOND $13000 C/S ORDER OF DISPOSITION OVROM ELIZA 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 ENTERED IN ERROR Comments: PLED GUILTY/PRISON-SUSPENDED; FORMAL PROBATION; FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS; COMMUNITY SERVED; RESTITUTION-SUPP ORDER TO FOLLOW; VORP; APPEAL BOND $13000 C/S MITTIMUS TO STATE INSTITUTION WILLS KENT BRADLEY 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 Comments: **FORT DES MOINES** RETURN OF SERVICE - OTHER POLK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 12/23/2003 12/26/2003 12/26/2003 Comments: TRANSPORT COSTS $96.24 OTHER EVENT 12/22/2003 12/23/2003 12/23/2003 Comments: DEFT'S COPY OF ORDER TO EXCEED STATE FEE LIMITATION RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE MAXEY REBECCA 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 CRIMINAL VERDICT HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 Comments: OF GUILTY TO BURGLARY 2ND, 3RD, AND USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE OFFENSE; DCS WILL SUBMIT A PSI BY 1 WK PRIOR TO SENTENCING DATE; PRESENTENCE CONF & SENTENCING 1-16-04 @ 8:30 AM IN RM 209A; BOND CONT AMENDED TRIAL INFORMATION HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 Comments: FILED BY JOHN JUDISCH JURY SELECTION HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 INSTRUCTIONS 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 Comments: TO THE JURY AND STATEMENT OF THE CASE OTHER ORDER HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/16/2003 12/17/2003 12/17/2003 Comments: JUV SEAN BILYEU SHALL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE CUSTODY OF POLK CO SHERIFF FOR THE DURATION OF HIS REQUIRED TESTIMONY/PRESENCE IN THIS MATTER. SEAN BILYEU SHALL REMAIN IN THE CUSTODY OF POLK CO SHERIFF OR ANY OTHER LOCATION (MEYER HALL) DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE SHERIFF UNTIL THE POLK CO SHERIFF CAN EXECUTE THE TIMELY TRANSPORT OF SEAN BILYEU FROM THE CUSTODY OF THE SHERIFF TO THE ELDORA TRAINING CENTER. OTHER ORDER HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/16/2003 12/16/2003 12/16/2003 Comments: DEFT TO BE RETURNED FROM ELDORA-COTTAGE 5 BY JIM TROTTER, INVESTIGATOR/CTY ATTY'S OFFICE; DEFT CAN BE PRESENT AT HIS TESTIMONY ON 12-16-03 OTHER ORDER HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/15/2003 12/16/2003 12/16/2003 Comments: ATDF IS PERMITTED TO EXCEED GUIDELINE FOR CT APPT ATTY IN THIS MATTER AND THAT THIS ORDER SHALL INCLUED ALL FEES INCURRED AS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. APPLICATION TO EXCEED FEES 12/15/2003 12/16/2003 12/16/2003 COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 12/12/2003 12/17/2003 12/17/2003 MOTION IN LIMINE TAYLOR KAREN 12/12/2003 12/15/2003 12/15/2003 ORDER SETTING HEARING OVROM ELIZA 12/05/2003 12/08/2003 12/08/2003 Comments: STATUS CONF: 12/12/03 @ 10:00 AM RM 204 RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 11/20/2003 12/09/2003 12/09/2003 Comments: 4=$0 RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 11/18/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 Comments: 3=$0 ORDER SETTING HEARING OVROM ELIZA 11/14/2003 11/14/2003 11/14/2003 Comments: STATUS CONFERENCE 11/13/03 9AM RM 204 ALL PARTIES MUST BE PRESENT ORDER SETTING TRIAL OVROM ELIZA 11/13/2003 11/14/2003 11/14/2003 Comments: 12/15/03 @ 9:00 AM RM 204 WAIVER OF SPEEDY TRIAL TAYLOR KAREN 11/13/2003 11/14/2003 11/14/2003 Comments: LIMITED RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 11/10/2003 11/12/2003 11/12/2003 Comments: 1 = $0 OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 Comments: DEPOSITION OF DAVID DUVALL OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 Comments: DEPOSITION OF BETH ANN SKOGEN OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 Comments: DEPOSITION OF NEIL LEMKE OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 Comments: DEPOSITION OF DENNIS WIEBEN OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 Comments: DEPOSITION OF NATALIE BALUKOFF OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 Comments: DEPOSITION OF SEAN BILYEU RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 10/31/2003 11/04/2003 11/04/2003 Comments: 6=$0 AMENDED TRIAL INFORMATION OVROM ELIZA 10/31/2003 11/03/2003 11/03/2003 Comments: FILED BY JOHN JUDISCH NOTICE WARD JAMES P 10/31/2003 11/03/2003 11/03/2003 Comments: OF ADDITIONAL WITNESSES DNU - SUBPOENA PER DUCES TECUM 10/31/2003 11/03/2003 11/03/2003 Comments: 1 - $13.70 OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: FOR DEPOSITIONS AND SERVICE AT STATE EXPENSE OTHER APPLICATION 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: FOR DEPOSITIONS AND SERVICE AT STATE EXPENSE NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: OF DEPOSITION NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 10/07/2003 10/08/2003 10/08/2003 Comments: ORDER ENTERED 9/18/03 SETTING TRIAL FOR 11/19/03 WAS IS ERROR. TRIAL IS RESET FOR 11/12/03 @9:00 AM RM 204 OTHER EVENT 09/24/2003 09/26/2003 09/26/2003 Comments: DEFT'S COPY OF APP TO W/D RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE OVROM ELIZA 09/18/2003 09/19/2003 09/19/2003 Comments: WAS HELD; TRIAL ON 11-19-03 ATDF TAYLOR OTHER EVENT AMUNDSON LAURA K 08/26/2003 09/02/2003 09/02/2003 Comments: STATEMENT OF HOURS .4-$18.00 APPEARANCE TAYLOR KAREN 08/25/2003 08/26/2003 08/26/2003 Comments: FILED BY KAREN TAYLOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL OVROM ELIZA 08/21/2003 08/22/2003 08/22/2003 Comments: OF ADULT PUBLIC DEF IS GRANTED KAREN TAYLOR IS APPOINTED ORDER OF ARRAIGNMENT MCGHEE ODELL 08/21/2003 08/21/2003 08/21/2003 Comments: Pretrial Conference 09/18/2003 01:30 PM DCC1 Trial 10/22/2003 09:00 AM DCC9 Bond is continued TRIAL INFORMATION OVROM ELIZA 08/20/2003 08/20/2003 08/20/2003 Comments: FILED BY JAMES WARD ORDER FOR ARRAIGNMENT MCGHEE ODELL 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 Comments: IN CUSTODY ON 8/21/03 AT 10:30AM JAILCOURT OUT OF CUSTODY AT 8AM ROOM 204 PRELIM HAS NOT BEEN WAIVED SET FOR 8/22/03 DNU - HEARING FOR BOND REDUCTION MCGHEE ODELL 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 Comments: BOND $13000 C/S APP FOR COUNSEL/FINANCIAL STATMENT MCGHEE ODELL 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 Comments: APPROVED PD IS APPOINTED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 Comments: BURGLARY 2ND ANPD 03-75354 HEARING FOR INITIAL APPEARANCE MCGHEE ODELL 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 Comments: Preliminary Hearing 08/22/2003 08:00 AM DA03 Bond Review 08/14/2003 08:30 AM DA04 Bond set for 713.5 $13000 C/S Total Bond $13000 C/S Indexed PUBLIC DEFENDER-POLK COUNTYPIN- PK1000375 Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK) Citation Number: Text reconfigured for ease of display in usenet Orig Paid Due Summary 3501.70 3501.70 0.00 COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 FINE 125.00 125.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 RESTITUTION 27.50 27.50 0.00 OTHER ------------------------------------- $3654.20 $3654.20 $0.00 >TWO of Kent Wills' usenet newsgroup identities: [...] Thank you for admiting I was and am correct about your OWI conviciton. It's accepted that when I'm correct and you can no longer lie your way out of what I've proved, you try to disctract from the truth of my post(s). It's one of the ways you admit the contents of the post was and is 100% accurate. Have you paid any of the over $8000.00 you owe the state due to your convictions for beating your ex-wife? Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON (DOB 05/22/1959) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 2 SPEED Disposition Status GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT "That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!" Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so stupid he thinks I'm Asian. MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/395db830731df54a http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead " ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would address the most pressing problems of our day. ... " April 2000, Gregory Hanson http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson G > Mike: Why is it that you posted widely that you didn't find G > Ken using EBSCO but then you posted ONLY in alt.adoption G > that you found one hit for Ken? 57 minutes after you acknowleded the 1 item you proceeded to deny there were any hits on EBSCO. How was that not bearing false witness, Mike? G > Does your EBSCO search cover INTERNATIONAL G > publications? Mike? G > Why did you badmouth what you did find as if G > it was "vanity press" junk when it was in fact G > produced at the request of government? MD > Per EBSCO, it is technically true Technically true? What do you mean by that? And in your attempt to dismiss or discount it you pretended that something written for a government grant was a "vanity press" publication? How was that not "bearing false witness"? DS > kenny boy summarized the information from a few DS > studies into one. He did no research personally. What was the actual (full) TITLE, Dan? Please be very clear on this. Did you rely on the title to presume what it actually was? Children at Risk: Summary of Findings & Recommendations from a Study of Federally Funded Child Abuse & Neglect Treatment Projects. Are you saying that was the title that Ken gave it? MD > Here we go again, typical abuser behavior. MD > You can't prove your position so you MD > attack other who exposed you. Mike, You outright LIED! Posted one hit then 57 minutes later posted "no hits". Are you really a Christian? MD > If you don't hide what you do, give us the journal MD > and date of your publications. Government MD > research on social issues is subject to OPEN MD > PUBLICATION! Maybe we should sue you MD > and the government agency that "hired" you MD > to make this research public! Is it secret or is it just a 29 year old government report? |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2010 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.