> Thanks for posting these links. It's quite enlightening to actually
> watch the decision-making and what goes into it. It's so clear that
> external circumstances are hugely important, and the key question
> seems to be what support the potential parent/s can count on.
Here's a follow-up article from Salon:
http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/06/17/belkin_emmie/index.html
Wednesday, June 17, 2009 08:18 PDT
Woman chooses abortion, on advice of blog
A week ago today, a 22-year-old woman named Emmie -- who'd found
herself unexpectedly pregnant -- wrote to Lisa Belkin's Motherlode
blog seeking advice. Belkin reprinted her e-mail.
I'm ... about to begin graduate studies at one of the most prestigious
and difficult universities in the world ... I've recently moved to a
new city, three hours away from my friends and family, and I'm looking
at a very lonely pregnancy. I know I'll have very little help and,
especially since you write so often about mothers that need help every
so often, that worries me. The father is no longer in the picture and,
even if he was, he's not the kind of person you'd want your baby near
(a poor decision on my part, I know).
I'm torn between my responsibilities as a mother, to protect and
nurture my child, and my responsibilities to my future, to succeed
academically and professionally ... I'm a good person and everyone
agrees that I'd be a great mom but I just don't know what's the smart
play here. I always assumed I would be a single mom (I'm not a huge
fan of marriage) but this is about 6 years too early ...
Do I really want to have a baby at 22? Do I really want to have this
guy's child? Can I finish my master's and raise a newborn? Can I do it
alone? Will I be happy? I know that mothers come in all shapes, sizes
and ages. I would like to ask you and your readers for their input. I
don't know what I'm up against. Maybe a good mother knows when it's
time to terminate, for her sake and for her child's.
Love and thanks,
Emmie
Belkin asked her readers to be "kind and wise" in response, "not
political and scathing." And guess what: Kind and wise they were. Yes,
the comments are moderated. But even without the brickbats and
dingbats (and remarkably, Belkin says she deleted only 4!), nearly 700
thoughtful comments remained, citing personal experiences both
rejoiced and regretted, and floating a range of options for Emmie: Can
you defer your program? Could you consider adoption? Might you manage
with subsidized campus day care, good insurance, food stamps, WIC? Are
you this close to deciding to terminate, but just need a virtual hand
to hold?
The answers, and denouement, came in yesterday's Motherlode. Deferral?
Not possible. Adoption? Met with a counselor; decided she couldn't
bear it. Public support or subsidy? No. "I'm stuck in the middle --
too financially stable to qualify for aid, grants, or scholarships,
but still too poor to successfully raise a child and go to school,"
Emmie wrote. Abortion? Yes.
Once I came to the decision to terminate the pregnancy, so much of the
guilt and sadness I'd been feeling melted away. I felt happy for the
first time since finding out and I feel like my family is supportive
of my decision. I'm focusing on the child I'll have in a few years
from now with someone I feel safe with and supported by ...
I owe a lot of that to your readers. They asked questions and pointed
out arguments I never considered. They were honest, sometimes harsh,
but always considerate. The one thing I realized, when I pulled all
the comments together, was that a baby is too precious and wonderful
to not plan for -- I owe the children I have a better head start.
If I get my degree then maybe the path it will take me on will lead me
to work on women's issues. Maybe one day I'll make a million dollars
and start a scholarship program for pregnant graduate students. I
can't believe that nothing good can come of this, I know I'll do
something right one of these days.
One good thing already: Regardless of Emmie's ultimate decision, her e-
saga stands as a moving reminder (as Belkin observes) of the power of
the Internet -- and, at a time when the topic of abortion has left us
dangerously short-fused, of the very real possibility of civility.
"You differed in what you thought she should do, but you all began
with the assumption that she was doing her best to make the decision
that was right for her," Belkin wrote to her readers, calling the
collective compassion of the responses "breathtaking."
Still and all, there should be better support systems for people like
Emmie -- not just a bunch of advice from articulate strangers, but
institutional structures that might broaden their range of workable
options. Perhaps Emmie would have made the same choice even if her
school -- and our society -- made things easier for pregnant women.
But, as commenter Hugh wondered: "What does it say about the future of
our modern culture based upon 'economic progress' when, as we can see
in Emmie's agonized choice ... the choice to reproduce is such a
burden upon one's ability to survive and prosper?"
Belkin yesterday did call for suggestions as to how to "help" young
women balance education with pregnancy or motherhood; many
organizations (and campuses) apparently do just that. But I -- perhaps
like Hugh -- would have also liked to see the word "change." As in:
How can we change our institutions so that women like Emmie find
themselves as respected as they were in this forum, and as supported
as possible in the real world?
-- Lynn Harris
rkb - 26 Jun 2009 02:35 GMT
As in:
> How can we change our institutions so that women like Emmie find
> themselves as respected as they were in this forum, and as supported
> as possible in the real world?
>
> -- Lynn Harris
I think that's a really good question. And it feeds right into the
debate we've had on this ng over the years: How much support should
society provide to parents, especially single mothers.
I think what it boils down to is this: In the US, we regard children
as more or less a private matter. Other than schooling (and that with
limitations) and abuse - and a tax deduction - the state doesn't take
a stance on children.
Some other countries do more. And some other countries do a lot less.
I'm reminded of Sarah Blaffer Hrdy's theory that societies tend to
favor the birth of supported children, and discard unsupported ones.
Usually, "supported" children are born into families that will provide
and care for them. The young woman in this story lacked that familial
support. If she'd had it, she could probably have gone ahead and borne
the baby.
kippa - 26 Jun 2009 17:22 GMT
> I'm reminded of Sarah Blaffer Hrdy's theory that societies tend to
> favor the birth of supported children, and discard unsupported ones.
> Usually, "supported" children are born into families that will provide
> and care for them. The young woman in this story lacked that familial
> support. If she'd had it, she could probably have gone ahead and borne
> the baby.
Very possibly.
I think the tribal concept of allomothers is foreign and perhaps
distasteful to the American dream of laissez faire individualism where
'good fences make good neighbours'.
Support systems are all important in raising children. For those
without the financial the clout necessary to hire support, it does
take a village.