Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Adoption / July 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Ad for Ontario open records

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Steve  White - 24 Jul 2009 04:10 GMT
This was interesting:

http://www.mcss.gov.on.ca/mcss/english/pillars/community/programs/adoptIn
fo/index.htm

Found it via an ad on another web site. Clicked and there I was.

Their 'open records' includes the odious contact veto.

steve
kippa - 24 Jul 2009 14:55 GMT
> This was interesting:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> steve

For some reason your link comes up 'file requested not found', Steve.
Is this http://www.mcss.gov.on.ca/mcss/english/pillars/community/programs/adoptInfo/inde
x.htm?247SEM

what you saw?
Hope the above works. In case it doesn't, here's the noxious part:
'Protecting your privacy
Adopted adults and birth parents also have the option to protect the
privacy of their post-adoption birth information. Adopted adults and
birth parents can:
file a notice of contact preference to specify how they would like to
be contacted
file a no contact notice if they do not want to be contacted, but are
willing to have their identifying information released
file a disclosure veto if the adoption was finalized before September
1, 2008. This will prevent identifying post-adoption birth information
from being released.'

What I don't understand is who so many people who supposedly support
open records profess to be happy about this travesty.
Especially when the original bill was passed and then gutted.
Steve  White - 25 Jul 2009 07:03 GMT
In article
<6bf0eaa4-3a3c-4680-9b48-e23320e7bf45@33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>,

> > This was interesting:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> open records profess to be happy about this travesty. Especially when
> the original bill was passed and then gutted.

That's the link. Re-wrap broke it on posting. Grr.

steve
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.