Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Adoption / September 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

The Catholic church sold my child

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
kippa - 21 Sep 2009 13:19 GMT
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/sep/19/catholic-church-sold-child

The Catholic church sold my child
Unmarried mother Philomena Lee was forced to give up her son to Irish
nuns, who sold him on to rich Americans. For decades she tried to find
him. A chance meeting with Martin Sixsmith eventually uncovered the
truth
Comments (17)
Martin Sixsmith
The Guardian,
Saturday 19 September 2009

It began with a chance encounter at a New Year's party in 2004. I was
trying to leave, but a woman said she had a message for me. She knew I
had been a journalist and she had a friend who wanted my help to solve
a family mystery. I agreed to a meeting, and found myself embarking on
a five-year quest for a man I had never met.

The woman's friend was called Jane, a financial administrator from St
Albans. She was in her late 30s and had been through an emotional
experience. Just before Christmas, her mother, Philomena, tipsy on
festive sherry, had revealed a secret she had kept for 50 years – she
had a son she had never mentioned to anyone.

Jane said her lost brother would be in his early 50s and probably
living in America. The reason for the secrecy was that he had been
born outside of marriage in Ireland at a time when such things were
considered shameful.

A little later I met Philomena herself. She told me she had given
birth in a country convent at Roscrea in County Tipperary on 5 July
1952. She was 18 when she met a young man who bought her a toffee
apple on a warm autumn evening at the county fair. "I had just left
convent school," she said with an air of wistful regret. "I went in
there when my mother died, when I was six and a half, and I left at 18
not knowing a thing about the facts of life. I didn't know where
babies came from ... "

When her pregnancy became obvious, her family had Philomena "put away"
with the nuns. After her baby, Anthony, was born, the mother superior
threatened Philomena with damnation if ever she breathed a word about
her "guilty secret". Terrified, she kept it quiet for more than half a
century. "All my life I couldn't tell anyone. We were so browbeaten,
it was such a sin. It was an awful thing to have a baby out of
wedlock ... Over the years I would say 'I will tell them, I will tell
them' but it was so ingrained deep down in my heart that I mustn't
tell anybody, that I never did."

I was intrigued to know why the nuns had been so insistent on the
importance of silence and secrecy. The answer, almost certainly, lay
in what had happened next.

Philomena was one of thousands of Irish women sent to convents in the
1950s and 60s, taken away from their homes and families because the
Catholic church said single mothers were moral degenerates who could
not be allowed to keep their children.

Such was the power of the church, and of Archbishop John Charles
McQuaid, that the state bowed before its demands, ceding
responsibility for the mothers and babies to the nuns. For them it was
not only a matter of sin and morality, but one of pounds, shillings
and pence. At the time young Anthony Lee was born, I discovered that
the Irish government was paying the Catholic church a pound a week for
every woman in its care, and two shillings and sixpence for every
baby. And that was not all.

After giving birth, the girls were allowed to leave the convent only
if they or their family could pay the nuns £100. It was a substantial
sum, and those who couldn't afford it – the vast majority – were kept
in the convent for three years, working in kitchens, greenhouses and
laundries or making rosary beads and religious artefacts, while the
church kept the profits from their labour.

Even crueller than the work was the fact that mothers had to care for
their children, developing maternal ties and affection that were to be
torn asunder at the end of their three-year sentence. Like all the
other girls, Philomena Lee was made to sign a renunciation document
agreeing to give up her three-year-old son and swearing on oath: "I
relinquish full claim for ever to my child and surrender him to Sister
Barbara, Superioress of Sean Ross Abbey. The purpose is to enable
Sister Barbara to make my child available for adoption to any person
she considers fit and proper, inside or outside the state. I further
undertake never to attempt to see, interfere with or make any claim to
the said child at any future time."

Philomena says she fought against signing the terrible undertaking.
"Oh God, my heart. I didn't want him to go. I just craved and begged
them to please let me keep him. None of us wanted to give our babies
up, none of us. But what else could we do? They just said, 'You have
to sign these papers.'

"I remember it was a Sunday evening ... I'm so sorry, I'm crying now
when I think about it ... "

Philomena cried when Anthony was taken from her at Christmas, 1955.
She was not told he was going or allowed to say goodbye, but she
spotted him being bundled into the back of a black car. When she
shouted to him, the noise of the engine drowned out her voice, but as
the car pulled away she is convinced that he stood up and peered
through the rear windscreen looking for her.

Afterwards, her father would not take her back because of the shame:
he had told friends, neighbours and Philomena's sisters that she had
gone away and no one knew where she was. So in the end the church
dispatched her to work at one of its homes for delinquent boys in
Liverpool.

Philomena trained as a nurse, got married in 1959 and had two more
children. She longed to tell them about their lost brother, but
couldn't. She kept her secret but never forgot her son. "Oh he was
gorgeous," she told me. "He was a lovely, gentle, quiet lad. All my
life I have never forgotten him. I would so often say, 'I wonder what
he is doing? Has he gone to Vietnam? Is he on skid row?' I just didn't
know what had happened to him ... "

Finally, without telling anyone, Philomena embarked on a lonely,
desperate search to find him. She went back to the convent in Roscrea
several times between 1956 and 1989 and asked the nuns to help her.
Each time they refused, brandishing her sworn undertaking that she
would "never attempt to see" her child.

When I agreed to help look for Anthony in 2004, we had little to go
on. We knew his date and place of birth, but his name would certainly
have been changed by his adoptive parents. Philomena had been told her
son would be taken to the US, but little else.

Early on in the search I realised that the Irish Catholic hierarchy
had been engaged in what amounted to an illicit baby trade. From the
end of the second world war until the 1970s, it considered the
thousands of souls born in its care to be the church's own property.
With or without the agreement of their mothers, it sold them to the
highest bidder. Every year, hundreds were shipped off to American
couples who paid "donations" (in reality, fees) to the nuns. Few if
any checks were made on the suitability of the adopting families – the
only condition laid down by Archbishop McQuaid was that they should be
practising Catholics.

When rumours of the church's role began to emerge decades later, much
of the incriminating paperwork disappeared in unexplained
circumstances, and even today the church guards its adoption archives
fiercely. It took a painstaking trawl through passport records and the
piecing together of fleeting references in old newspaper articles to
discover what had become of Anthony Lee ...

Doc and Marge Hess from St Louis, Missouri fulfilled the McQuaid
criteria – they were good Catholics, a professional couple in their
early 40s, and Marge's brother was a bishop. The Hesses already had
three sons, but they wanted a daughter. In the course of my research,
I came into possession of Marge Hess's diaries and was able to trace
her innermost thoughts as she flew to Ireland in August 1955 to scour
the church's mother and baby homes for a little girl. I read her first
impressions of the shy three-year-old, Mary McDonald, who was offered
to her by the mother superior of the Roscrea convent. And I discovered
the twist of fate that led her to adopt Anthony Lee.

When Marge leaned down to pick up her new daughter in the convent
nursery, she was charmed to see Mary's best friend, a little boy in
baggy trousers, come running to give her a kiss. She fell for him at
once. That evening she called her husband in St Louis and asked if it
would be OK to bring two children back instead of one.

Anthony's spontaneous show of affection for Marge changed his life. By
the end of 1955, he and Mary had been transported from rural Ireland
to a new existence and new identities. He was renamed Michael Hess and
grew up to be an A student. He was physically attractive and gifted,
ran cross-country and sang in school musical productions. But he was
haunted by half-remembered visions of his first three years in Ireland
and by a lifelong yearning to find his mother.

Separated by fate, mother and child spent decades looking for each
other, repeatedly thwarted by the refusal of the nuns to reveal
information, each of them unaware that the other was also yearning and
searching.

Michael became a successful lawyer. As a rising star of the Republican
National Committee, he masterminded the party's electoral strategy,
brokering the redistricting (gerrymandering) reforms that kept them in
power for more than a decade. When George Bush Sr became president, he
made Mike his chief legal counsel.

But Michael Hess was gay. He was obliged to conceal his sexuality in a
party that was rabidly homophobic. He was tormented by the double life
he was forced to lead and by the fact that his work was entrenching in
power a party that victimised his friends and lovers.

He was tormented, too, by the absence of his mother and by the
orphan's sense of helplessness: he didn't know where he came from,
didn't know who he was or how he should live. He felt unloved by his
adoptive father and brothers; he felt guilt over his sexuality and he
had a series of stormy relationships. A spurned lover burned himself
to death because Mike rejected him.

But he was loved by his adoptive mother and by the little girl who was
plucked with him from the Roscrea convent who became his lifelong
friend and sister. He found some happiness in a long-term relationship
with a caring, loving partner. But he could never be at peace. He went
back to Roscrea, first in 1977 and again in 1993, to plead with the
nuns to tell him how to find his mother. They turned him away.

On his return to the US, he plunged into alcohol, drugs and unbridled
sexual indulgence. His behaviour brought with it the terrible fear of
exposure that would destroy him as a senior Republican official, but
he could not stop himself. On one of his lost weekends he became
infected with HIV.

He and Pete, his long-term partner, agonised over their future. Pete
stood by him, but Michael's health began to deteriorate. Fearing the
worst, they flew to Roscrea in 1993 to make an emotional appeal to the
nuns ... but still they refused to tell him where he could find his
mother, or indeed that her sisters and brother – his aunts and uncle –
were living just a few miles down the road.

In desperation, Mike asked the mother superior if he could at least be
buried in the convent if he were to die: he would put enough
information on his gravestone to help his mother find out about his
life "if ever she comes looking for me". As we know – but Mike did not
– Philomena was looking for him, returning to Roscrea, seeking traces
of her son ...

Obituaries in US newspapers after Michael's death in August 1995
provided vital clues in my search for him. The hunt for Michael took
me through state and church archives, through adoption agencies,
American university records and Republican party sources before it led
to the end of the trail and the story's poignant, unexpected
conclusion. It threw up a Hardyesque tale of coincidences and missed
connections, and a powerful indictment of two historical eras: 1950s
Ireland and 1980s America.

In addition to Mike and Philomena's quest, I discovered the thousands
of other lost "orphans" whose lives were changed for ever by the greed
and hypocrisy of church and state. Like Michael, many of them are
still looking for their parents and, through them, for their identity.

Now in her 70s, and five years after visiting her son's grave for the
first time, Philomena is remarkably devoid of bitterness. She has
started to go to mass again. But she blames herself for everything,
for giving her son away and for not speaking out about him earlier,
when things could have been different: "If only, if only. I curse
myself every time I think of it. If only I'd mentioned it all those
years ago, maybe he wouldn't ... Oh Lord, it makes my heart ache! I'm
sure there are lots of women to this very day – they're the same as
me; they haven't said anything.

"It is the biggest regret of my life and I have to bear that. It is my
own fault and now it is my woe."

The Lost Child of Philomena Lee by Martin Sixsmith is published by
Macmillan, £12.99. To order a copy for £11.99 with free UK p&p, go to
guardian.co.uk/bookshop or call 0330 333 6846
kippa - 26 Sep 2009 18:14 GMT
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1216191/Stolen-mother--sold-highest-bi
dder.html


Stolen from his mother - and sold to the highest bidder
By MARTIN SIXSMITH
26th September 2009
Comments

Two decades as a journalist reporting wars and disasters left me
inured to suffering. Working in Whitehall under New Labour gave me a
close-up view of the arrogance and cynicism of power.

As a result, I've always considered myself a hard-bitten sort. But
some of the things I discovered on the quest that has detained me for
the past five years  -  the depth of inhumanity and cruelty I stumbled
across  -  made my jaw drop.

Early in 2004, I was approached by a woman who knew I had been a
reporter. She said she had a friend who thought I could help her solve
a family mystery. I told her that wasn't my sort of journalism; but
she insisted and I went to the meeting.

The woman's friend was called Jane, a financial administrator from St
Albans. She was in her late 30s and had been through an emotional
experience.

Just before Christmas, her mother Philomena, tipsy on festive sherry,
had revealed a secret she'd kept for 50 years: she had a son that she
had never spoken about to anyone.

The reason for the secrecy was that he had been born illegitimate in
Ireland at a time when such things were considered shameful and to be
hushed up. Jane said her lost brother would be in his early 50s and
probably living in the United States.

I still wasn't sure about getting involved, but a little later I met
Philomena herself. What I discovered was a tale of the abuse of power,
and how dogma and hypocrisy in high places can ruin the lives of so
many people.

Philomena told me she had given birth in a convent at Roscrea in
County Tipperary on July 5, 1952. She had been 18 when she had met a
young man who bought her a toffee apple on a warm autumn evening at
the county fair.

'I had just left convent school,' she said with a sigh. 'I went in
there when my mother died, when I was six-and-a-half, and I left at 18
not knowing a thing about the facts of life. I didn't know where
babies came from . . .'

When her pregnancy became obvious, her family had had Philomena 'put
away' with the nuns.

After her baby, Anthony, was born, the Mother Superior threatened
Philomena with damnation if ever she breathed a word about her 'guilty
secret'. Terrified, she kept it quiet for more than half a century.

'All my life, I couldn't tell anyone,' she said. 'We were so brow-
beaten, and it was such a sin. It was an awful thing to have a baby
out of wedlock . . .

Over the years I would say, "I will tell them, I will tell them"  -
but it was so ingrained down deep in my heart that I mustn't tell
anybody, that I never did.' I was intrigued to know why the nuns had
been so insistent on the importance of silence and secrecy. The
answer, almost certainly, lay in what had happened next.

Philomena was just one of thousands of women sent to Irish convents in
the 1950s and 60s, taken away from their homes and families because
the Roman Catholic Church said single mothers were moral degenerates
who could not be allowed to keep their children.

Such was the power of the Church, and of its then leader, Archbishop
John Charles McQuaid, that the state bowed before its demands, ceding
responsibility for the mothers and babies to the nuns.

For them, it was not only a matter of sin and morality, but one of
pounds, shillings and pence.

Philomena told me about the hellish labour she was forced to perform
in the convent laundries after her baby was born. Other girls were
made to work in commercial greenhouses, making religious artefacts for
sale, or stringing rosary beads until the wire cut grooves in their
hands that would never disappear.

For the church, it was not only a matter of sin and morality, but one
of pounds, shillings and pence
The Church may have opened its doors to 'fallen women'; but once they
were inside, it exploited them mercilessly.

From speaking to mothers who were caught up in the convent homes, and
by digging through government records, I realised that in the early
Fifties the state was paying the nuns £1 a week for every one of the
thousands of mothers they had in their care, and 2s 6d for every baby.
In addition, the Church kept the proceeds from the girls' labour.

It was a source of significant income, and the nuns made sure the
women stayed and worked for at least three years. They could get out
only by paying £100  -  an impossible amount for the vast majority.

In a fascinating echo of the debate going on today in America, the
Irish government was trying to introduce a basic health and welfare
service, which would have provided some safeguards for mothers and
their babies.

But like the American right wing, the Church denounced the plan as
'opening the gates to Communism'.

John Charles McQuaid wrote to the Vatican: 'If adopted in law, it
would constitute a readymade instrument for totalitarianism.'

The legislation was defeated, and the Church kept its malevolent
stranglehold on the fate of the nation's orphans. The government was
humiliated into tendering its resignation.

Even more shocking than the exploitation of the mothers was the
exploitation of their children. The girls had to care for their babies
during their three-year sentence in the convents  -  only then to be
told that their child was being taken from them.

For women who had had so long to bond with their sons or daughters,
the parting was terrible.

Philomena showed me the undertaking she had been forced to sign.

'I, Philomena Lee', it says, over a signature in a juvenile hand, 'do
hereby relinquish full claim forever to my said child Anthony Lee and
surrender him to Sister Barbara, Superioress of Sean Ross Abbey . . .
to make my child available for adoption to any person she considers
fit and proper, inside or outside the state.

'I further undertake never to attempt to see, interfere with or make
any claim to the said child at any future time.' Philomena told me she
had fought against signing the document.

'Oh God, my heart. I didn't want him to go. I just craved and begged
them to please let me keep him.

'None of us wanted to give our babies up, none of us. But what else
could we do? They just said: "You have to sign these papers."

The girls had to care for their babies during their three-year
sentence in the convents  -  to be told that their child was being
taken from them

'I remember it was a Sunday evening . . . I'm so sorry, I'm crying now
when I think about it.'

Philomena cried when Anthony was taken from her, at Christmas 1955.
She was not allowed to say goodbye, but she spotted him being bundled
into the back of a black car.

When she shouted to him, the noise of the engine drowned out her
voice, but as the car pulled away she is convinced he stood up in the
seat and peered through the rear windscreen looking for her.

Afterwards, her father would not take her back because of the shame:
he had told neighbours, friends and Philomena's own sisters that she
had 'gone away' and that no one knew where she was.

So, in the end, the Church despatched her to work at one of its homes
for delinquent boys in Liverpool.

Philomena trained as a nurse, got married in 1959 and had two more
children. She longed to tell them about their brother, but couldn't.

She kept her secret but she never forgot her son. The thought of him
gnawed at her; she worried how he was coping without her.

'Oh, he was gorgeous,' she told me. 'He was a lovely, gentle, quiet
lad. All my life I have never forgotten him. I have prayed for him
every day.

'Over the years I would so often say: "I wonder what he is doing. Has
he gone to Vietnam? Is he on Skid Row?" I just didn't know what had
happened to him."

Finally  -  without telling anyone  -  Philomena embarked on a lonely,
desperate search to find her son. She went back to the convent in
Roscrea several times and asked the nuns to help her.

Each time they refused, brandishing her sworn undertaking that she
would 'never attempt to see' her child.

When I agreed to help look for Anthony in 2004, we had little to go
on. We knew his date and place of birth, but his name, Anthony Lee,
would certainly have been changed by his adoptive parents.

Philomena had been told that her son would be taken to the United
States, but little else.

The quest became more fascinating than any detective story: its twists
and turns, the unexpected coincidences that finally led us to
Philomena's lost child, are the backbone of my book. But the life
story that the detective work uncovered is truly remarkable.

'Over the years I would say: "I wonder what he is doing. Has he gone
to Vietnam? Is he on Skid Row?"'

Early on in the search, I realised that the Irish Catholic hierarchy
had been engaged in what amounted to an illicit baby trade. Archbishop
McQuaid regarded single mothers as sinners, and believed their
children would be safer away from them.

But he prevented social workers from intervening 'because they take no
cognizance of the gravity of the woman's sin . . . her lust and
selfgratification . . . and her fall is all too often condoned and
excused.'

Even worse, he was horrified that the children might be given to
Protestants. McQuaid insisted unbendingly that adopting couples should
be practising Roman Catholics.

But there were no proper checks on their background, as long as they
had the money to pay the 'donation' the Church demanded.

The result was that the 'orphans' were sold to the highest bidder,
however unsuitable they might be, and thousands were bought by wealthy
Americans at a going rate of between $2,000 and $3,000.

Philomena's son was one of them. When rumours of the Church's role
began to emerge decades later, much of the incriminating paperwork was
hastily destroyed, and even today the Church guards its adoption
archives fiercely.

It took a painstaking trawl through passport records, and the piecing
together of fleeting references in old newspaper articles, before we
discovered that Anthony Lee had been offered to a middle-class couple
from St Louis, Missouri.

Marge and Doc Hess certainly fulfilled the McQuaid criteria: they were
good Catholics, a professional couple in their early 40s, and Marge's
brother was himself a bishop. The Hesses already had three sons, but
they wanted a daughter.

In the course of my research, I came into possession of Marge Hess's
diaries.

Their carefullywritten entries gave me a startling insight into
everything from the clothes and lip gloss she wore to the emotions
that overwhelmed her as she studied herself in the mirror before
setting off to Ireland.

In August 1955, Marge Hess scoured the Irish mother and baby homes for
a little girl.

Her diary records her first impressions of the shy three-year- old,
Mary McDonald, who was offered to her by the Mother Superior of the
Roscrea convent. And it reveals the twist of fate that led her to
adopt Anthony Lee.

When Marge leaned down to pick up her new daughter in the convent
nursery, she was charmed to see Mary's best friend, a little boy in
baggy trousers, come running to give her a kiss.

Marge fell for him at once. That evening, she called her husband in St
Louis and asked if it would be all right to bring two children back
instead of one.

Anthony's unthinking show of affection for Marge was the random nudge
of chance that changed his life. By the end of 1955, he and Mary had
been transported from rural Ireland to a new existence and new
identities in the New World.

He was renamed Michael Hess and grew up to be an 'A' student. He was
physically attractive and gifted, ran cross-country and sang in school
musical productions.

But he was haunted by halfremembered visions of his first three years
in Ireland, and by a lifelong yearning to find his mother.

He remembered her touch and the way she sang to him, and he embarked
on repeated fruitless attempts to find her, tragically unaware that
Philomena, too, was pining and searching for him.

Both came back to the convent and pleaded for information, but the
nuns  -  perhaps ashamed of their role in Ireland's baby trade  -
refused to help.

Michael became a successful lawyer. He was spotted by the leaders of
Ronald Reagan's Republican Party and brought into the White House.

As a rising star of the Republican National Committee, he masterminded
the party's electoral strategy, brokering the redistricting
(gerrymandering) reforms that kept them in power for over a decade.

When George Bush Senior became president, he made Michael his Chief
Legal Counsel.

But Michael Hess was gay, and in a Republican Party that was rabidly
homophobic, he was obliged to conceal his sexuality.

He was tormented by the double life he was forced to lead, and by the
fact that his work was entrenching in power a party that victimised
his friends and lovers.

When the president gave in to conservative demands to block funds for
Aids research, Mike was plunged into despair.

He was tormented, too, by the absence of his mother and by the
orphan's sense of helplessness.

He didn't know where he came from, didn't know who he was, or how he
should live. He felt unloved by his adoptive father and brothers,
living in fear that the stern, critical Doc Hess would discover his
sexuality.

As a teenager, Mike had rowed with Doc, and Doc had told him he would
no longer support him or pay his university fees. Mike suspected Doc
knew he was gay.

As a practising Roman Catholic, he also felt guilt over his sexuality.
He had a series of stormy relationships and was deeply disturbed when
a spurned lover burned himself to death.

But Mike was loved by his adoptive mother and by Mary, the little girl
who was plucked with him from the Roscrea convent and became his
lifelong friend and 'sister'.

He found some happiness in a long-term relationship with a caring,
loving partner  -  but he could never be at peace.

He went back to Roscrea, first in 1977 and again in 1993, to plead
with the nuns to tell him how to find his mother. They turned him
away.

On his return to the U.S., he plunged into alcohol, drugs and
unbridled sexual indulgence.

It was as if the void he felt in his life was driving him into
dangerous practices that put his reputation and career in jeopardy.
For a gay man in the decade of Aids, it was close to courting a death
sentence.

By the late 1980s, Mike found himself embarking on ever-more-frequent
lost weekends in the gay bars and clubs of Washington and other
cities.

His behaviour brought with it the terrible fear of exposure that would
destroy him as a senior Republican official, but he could not stop
himself.

On one of his lost weekends, he became infected with the HIV virus. He
and Pete, his long-term partner, agonised over their future.

Mike kept his illness secret, refusing to tell his adoptive parents
and urging Mary to tell no one. Pete stood by him, but Michael's
health began to deteriorate. Fearing the worst, they flew to Roscrea
in 1993 to make an emotional appeal to the nuns.

Mike found himself embarking on ever-more-frequent lost weekends in
the gay bars and clubs of Washington and other cities

But still the nuns refused to tell him where he could find his mother,
or indeed that her sisters and brother  -  his aunts and uncle  -
were living just a few miles down the road.

In desperation, Michael asked the Mother Superior if he could at least
be buried in the convent if he were to die: he would put enough
information on his gravestone to help his mother find out about his
life 'if ever she comes looking for me'.

As we know (but Michael did not), Philomena was looking for him,
returning to Roscrea, seeking traces of her son . . .

The hunt for Michael took me through state and Church archives,
through adoption agencies, American university records and Republican
Party sources before it led to the end of the trail and the story's
poignant, unexpected conclusion.

It threw up a Hardyesque tale of coincidences and missed connections;
and a powerful indictment of two historical eras: 1950s Ireland and
1980s America.

As we discovered, the nuns did agree to let Michael be buried in
Roscrea  -  in return for a large donation to Church funds  -  and he
did, indeed, put a 'message from beyond the grave' on his marble
headstone, a message that ultimately allowed us to trace the path of
his life.

'Michael Hess, a man of two nations and many talents,' the inscription
reads. 'Born July 5, 1952, Sean Ross Abbey, Roscrea. Died August 15,
1995, Washington DC.'

Before his remains were flown to Ireland, the White House had staged a
lavish memorial service for him. Many of the Republican Party leaders
were there, and Ronald and Nancy Reagan sent personal messages of
sympathy.

But nothing was said about his sexuality. Afterwards, Doc Hess had met
Pete, Michael's partner, and was shocked to learn both that his son
had been gay and that he had died of Aids.

Ultimately, my search brought me to an overgrown grave in a quiet
country convent. In addition to Michael and Philomena's story, I had
discovered the thousands of other lost 'orphans' whose lives were
changed for ever by the greed and hypocrisy of Church and state.

Like Michael, many of them are still looking for their parents and,
through them, for their identity.

Now in her 70s, Philomena is remarkably devoid of bitterness. She has
started to go to Mass again. But she blames herself for everything  -
for giving her son away and for not speaking out about him earlier,
when things could have been different.

'If only, Martin, if only. I curse myself every time I think of it. If
only I'd mentioned it all those years ago, maybe he wouldn't . . .

'Oh Lord, it makes my heart ache. I'm sure there are lots of women to
this very day who are the same as me; they haven't said anything . . .
It is the biggest regret of my life and I have to bear that. It is my
own fault, and now it is my woe.'

Knowing what happened to her son has at least resolved the doubts that
haunted Philomena for half a century. I have stood with her at the
side of his grave and heard how she speaks to him after the separation
of all the years.

'Thank God you are back home again,' she says. 'You're here where I
can visit you now.

But you came to this place and no one told you anything. No one told
you I was looking for you and that I loved you, my son. How different
it all could have been . . .'

The Lost Child Of Philomena Lee by Martin Sixsmith is published by
Macmillan £12.99. To order a copy (p&p free), call 0845 155 0720.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1216191/Stolen-mother--sold-highest-bi
dder.html#ixzz0SERb59C7

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.