Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Pregnancy / Breastfeeding / July 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I am so angry

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jake Mysterio - 23 Jul 2005 12:07 GMT
Went to church this evening with DD2, 5 weeks old.  It was a packed service
and I had no choice but to sit next to a male. DD2 needed a feed, so I fed
her, I didn't think twice about it.  After the service one of the paid staff
of the church approached me and asked me (well told me) to breastfeed at the
back of the church or in the other room in the future as it made the person
next to me very uncomfortable.I was to angry to argue about it at the time
but I will be contacting them in the next week.  I have only ever been asked
not to bf 4 times in the time I have bf all 3 of my children and 3 of those
times have been from this church it sooooo pisses me off. (the other time
was a mcdonalds) Now correct me if I am wrong but isnt against the law for
them to tell me not to bf here in australia. Oh and it wasnt like I wasnt
thinking of the guy beside me I was very aware that he was there and tryed
to be as descreet as possible, I tryed to feed on the right side so as to be
not right next to him but DD2 kept fussing and in the end I had to switch
her to the left which is her prefered side.  This has so annoyed me that I
am seriously considering whether this is really the church for me, and I
have been with this church for 5 years now so that is a big statement. I
hate to think what they will be like when DD2 is a toddler and she wants to
feed!!!! Anyway I have decided that even though they have told me not to
feed in the main church area I will continue to anyway as my understanding
is that I have the legal right to do so. And if I am told to leave again I
will probably leave the church for good.

Cheri
Mum to Sean and Jasmine (3years)
Tara (5 weeks)
Mamma Mia - 23 Jul 2005 13:54 GMT
http://www.breastfeeding.asn.au/bfinfo/out.html

cheri, you have the legal right to breastfeed where you damm well like.
this happend to a friend of mine just now in a shop, and the breastfeeding
asn is sending her some info on her rights.

i dont blame you for being mad, what an old fart to tell you not to feed.
hang on, he didnt even have the guts to tell you himself.  squirt breast
milk on him next time.    get the minister to do a sermon on the topic.
in fact, if i was you, if the church does not support you on this one, then
yes, i'd find a new church.

good luck, let us know what happens

chris

> Went to church this evening with DD2, 5 weeks old.  It was a packed
> service and I had no choice but to sit next to a male. DD2 needed a feed,
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Mum to Sean and Jasmine (3years)
> Tara (5 weeks)
A s s i l e m - 23 Jul 2005 13:56 GMT
> http://www.breastfeeding.asn.au/bfinfo/out.html

>squirt breast
> milk on him next time.

ROFL!

melissa

> chris
Aussie Lurker - 23 Jul 2005 15:11 GMT
> http://www.breastfeeding.asn.au/bfinfo/out.html
>
> cheri, you have the legal right to breastfeed where you damm well like.
> this happend to a friend of mine just now in a shop, and the breastfeeding
> asn is sending her some info on her rights.

Yep you are 100% correct :)  It is discrimination if you ask a breastfeeding
mother not to feed.   When you contact them next week advise them that they
are breaking the law.

Aussie Lurker
Dizzysmamma - 23 Jul 2005 17:54 GMT
>> http://www.breastfeeding.asn.au/bfinfo/out.html
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Aussie Lurker

Oh Cherie I empathize with you 110%.  You do have the right to bf your baby
where ever you need to.  However, if I'm reading your OP correctly, they
didn't ask you not to bf her at all just to move to the back of the
sanctuary to do it.  Do I agree with them?  Hell no.  Do I think they have a
moral right to ask this of you?  Again, Hell no.  But they did not tell you
you couldn't bf your baby so legally I don't think there is anything you can
do in that regard.  However, I would definately talk to the priest, pastor,
vicar...whatever and let him/her know that this not the kind of tolerance
one would expect from a church.  That you don't like being made to feel like
a criminal for feeding your baby and that while it would make you sad to do
so you just might have to find another church with a more tolerant and
progressive outlook.  One thing that doesn't change no matter what country
you're in, churches "hate" to lose members.  Good luck.

{{{{{{Cherie}}}}}}

Angela

Signature

Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat."we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're
mad.""How do you know I'm mad?". said Alice."You must be," said the Cat,"or
you wouldn't have come here.".

Mum of Two - 23 Jul 2005 23:28 GMT
>>> http://www.breastfeeding.asn.au/bfinfo/out.html
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> you you couldn't bf your baby so legally I don't think there is anything
> you can do in that regard.

I disagree. She was told to move, which means she was told she couldn't
breastfeed where she was. So if the laws where she is protect the rights of
a BF mother to breastfeed *wherever* she is legally allowed to be, the law
will be on her side.

Signature

Amy
Mum to Carlos born sleeping 20/11/02,
& Ana born screaming 30/06/04
http://www.freewebs.com/carlos2002/
http://www.babiesonline.com/babies/a/ana%5Fj%5F2004/
My blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/querer-hijo-querer-hija/

Aussie Lurker - 24 Jul 2005 14:39 GMT
> Oh Cherie I empathize with you 110%.  You do have the right to bf your
> baby where ever you need to.  However, if I'm reading your OP correctly,
> they didn't ask you not to bf her at all just to move to the back of the
> sanctuary to do it.

Yes you're right I missed that point.
I had my first child in 1986 and then started my "second" family in 1998.  I
was looking forward to the change in attitude towards breastfeeding as I had
struck MANY problems when I breastfed my first.  Well guess
what.............there was NO change in attitude!!!!!!!  I was still made to
feel that I was doing something wrong.  I can still remember an exchange
with a woman in Hobart when I was breastfeeding my 3rd it was 2002 and when
I politely explained to her that I was doing something completely natural
she said "sh.tting is natural would you like me to do that in front of you".
LOL.
The only problem I ever had in church though was that I nearly started a
fire.  It was Christmas Eve 1998 and I was holding my sleeping bub and a
song sheet and a lit candle. Mmmm recipe almost for disaster, I was able to
blow the flames out and ended up with 1/2 a song sheet that was rather
singed.  :)

Aussie Lurker
Jake Mysterio - 24 Jul 2005 14:49 GMT
Hence the reason most churches have carols with out the candles now!!!!

>> Oh Cherie I empathize with you 110%.  You do have the right to bf your
>> baby where ever you need to.  However, if I'm reading your OP correctly,
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Aussie Lurker
Dizzysmamma - 24 Jul 2005 17:13 GMT
>> Oh Cherie I empathize with you 110%.  You do have the right to bf your
>> baby where ever you need to.  However, if I'm reading your OP correctly,
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> completely natural she said "sh.tting is natural would you like me to do
> that in front of you". LOL.

I would have told her, "Whatever knocks your socks off, Lady."  ;o)

> The only problem I ever had in church though was that I nearly started a
> fire.  It was Christmas Eve 1998 and I was holding my sleeping bub and a
> song sheet and a lit candle. Mmmm recipe almost for disaster, I was able
> to blow the flames out and ended up with 1/2 a song sheet that was rather
> singed.  :)

I would have had a heart attack!  Did you save the song sheet?  It would
have made a good story to tell your children later.

Angela
Aussie Lurker - 25 Jul 2005 14:19 GMT
>>> Oh Cherie I empathize with you 110%.  You do have the right to bf your
>>> baby where ever you need to.  However, if I'm reading your OP correctly,
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> I would have had a heart attack!  Did you save the song sheet?  It would
> have made a good story to tell your children later.

I did keep it and we have a good giggle about it.  Jordan says "tell us the
story about how when I was a baby you nearly burnt the church down".  LOL

Aussie Lurker
A&G&K&H - 25 Jul 2005 06:31 GMT
> "However, if I'm reading your OP correctly, they
> didn't ask you not to bf her at all just to move to the back of the
> sanctuary to do it.

They still can't ask you to move unless you are somewhere you aren't legally
aloud to be.
Its the same was as if they'd asked somebody of aboriginal or Asian decent
to move ... its the same principle of discrimination that applies.
Amanda
Shell - 24 Jul 2005 20:31 GMT
>> http://www.breastfeeding.asn.au/bfinfo/out.html
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Aussie Lurker

But technically they didn't ask her not to breastfeed, they asked her to
breastfeed somewhere else.

~Shell
Mum of Two - 24 Jul 2005 22:21 GMT
>>> http://www.breastfeeding.asn.au/bfinfo/out.html
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> But technically they didn't ask her not to breastfeed, they asked her to
> breastfeed somewhere else.

That doesn't matter. They're preventing her from breastfeeding wherever she
is legally allowed to be. What if they'd asked her to breastfeed down the
street, or at home? Technically they wouldn't be asking her not to
breastfeed.
They should have suggested to the person who took issue with it that they
move instead.

Signature

Amy
Mum to Carlos born sleeping 20/11/02,
& Ana born screaming 30/06/04
http://www.freewebs.com/carlos2002/
http://www.babiesonline.com/babies/a/ana%5Fj%5F2004/
My blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/querer-hijo-querer-hija/ 

Shell - 25 Jul 2005 21:20 GMT
>>>> http://www.breastfeeding.asn.au/bfinfo/out.html
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> They should have suggested to the person who took issue with it that they
> move instead.

Yes, they should have.

~Shell
Jake Mysterio - 24 Jul 2005 23:04 GMT
Yeah but isnt it against the law still, I mean really it is no different to
being told you will have to move to the toilet to feed, I thought the idea
of the act was to make it that you had the right to feed whenever and
wherever you liked, I may be wrong though.

Cheri

>>> http://www.breastfeeding.asn.au/bfinfo/out.html
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> ~Shell
A & L Lane - 24 Jul 2005 23:58 GMT
> Yeah but isnt it against the law still, I mean really it is no different to
> being told you will have to move to the toilet to feed, I thought the idea
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>snipped..

> > But technically they didn't ask her not to breastfeed, they asked her to
> > breastfeed somewhere else.
> >
> > ~Shell

I agree - I always thought the purpose of the law was to handle exactly
these kinds of situations.  If it is ok to bottlefeed the baby there, then
it would be discriminatory to ask a bf Mum to move.  He could have moved if
it was upsetting him that much.

let us know what the church says about it.

cheers
Leah
Ms Leebee - 25 Jul 2005 05:54 GMT
> Yeah but isnt it against the law still, I mean really it is no different
> to being told you will have to move to the toilet to feed, I thought the
> idea of the act was to make it that you had the right to feed whenever and
> wherever you liked, I may be wrong though.

ugh.  b'feeding in the loo's, how hygienic :(

You could have a point - esp if it is your traditional breezy church -
asking you to sit down the back is asking you to sit in a draft and catch
your death of cold !
A&G&K&H - 25 Jul 2005 06:28 GMT
> >> http://www.breastfeeding.asn.au/bfinfo/out.html
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> But technically they didn't ask her not to breastfeed, they asked her to
> breastfeed somewhere else.

They still can't ask you to move.
Amanda
Ms Leebee - 24 Jul 2005 03:26 GMT
> http://www.breastfeeding.asn.au/bfinfo/out.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> good luck, let us know what happens

If i'd said it first, this is exactly what I would have said.

Good luck - it must be terrible to feel an outcast in your own church :(
al - 23 Jul 2005 14:21 GMT
> Went to church this evening with DD2, 5 weeks old.  It was a packed service
> and I had no choice but to sit next to a male. DD2 needed a feed, so I fed
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Mum to Sean and Jasmine (3years)
> Tara (5 weeks)

Since you are calling it a church, I am assuming it is a christian
denomination. So....I guess I'd remind them that Mary was a nursing
mom. There are even some old paintings of Mary nursing Jesus. Maybe you
could have one of the images made into a t-shirt and wear it to the
next service (or maybe hold a nurse-in with everyone wearing them).

http://www.catholiccompany.com/product_detail.cfm?ID=4979
http://www.si.umich.edu/Art_History/demoarea/details/NO065.html
http://www.metmuseum.org/Works_of_Art/viewOne.asp?dep=11&isHighlight=0&viewmode=
1&item=41.190.13

http://fototapeta.art.pl/fti-takuya.html
http://www.denverartmuseum.org/pub/fut_3.cfm
http://www.royalacademy.org.uk/ixbin/hixclient.exe?submit-button=search&search-f
orm=artist_record.html&_IXARTIST_=8118


The above are just a few of the images of the Madonna nursing Jesus
that I found online. The last one in particular is quite interesting
since Jesus looks to be an older baby/toddler since he has a full head
of hair and fills the madonna's lap. According to one site I found, the
oldest image of Mary, found in the Catacomb of Priscilla in Rome,
depicts her nursing Jesus.

Oh...I forgot...Promom.org has a fine art gallery with lots of Madonna
and Child imnages.

Good Luck. I think that unless you confront them and lead a campaign to
educate the parishioners that you are going to have ongoing problems.

Annette
MareCat - 23 Jul 2005 15:53 GMT
> Good Luck. I think that unless you confront them and lead a campaign
> to
> educate the parishioners that you are going to have ongoing problems.

ITA. If this happened to me, I would do (at the very least) all of the
following: 1) contact the head of the church and educate him/her about
the law; 2) continue to attend services and NIP as needed; 3) contact
the media and/or stage a nurse-in if necessary.

As I've grown older, I find that I'm less afraid to stand up for myself
and be a bitch when necessary. The right to NIP is something that I feel
*very* passionate about, and I would never just let something like this
slide.

Good luck, Cheri!

Mary
Mum of Two - 23 Jul 2005 23:26 GMT
>> Good Luck. I think that unless you confront them and lead a campaign to
>> educate the parishioners that you are going to have ongoing problems.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> law; 2) continue to attend services and NIP as needed; 3) contact the
> media and/or stage a nurse-in if necessary.

Or erect a great big sign featuring a large pair of breasts on their front
lawn, with the message "Breastmilk - perfected by God" and _then_ invite the
news media ;-)

Signature

Amy
Mum to Carlos born sleeping 20/11/02,
& Ana born screaming 30/06/04
http://www.freewebs.com/carlos2002/
http://www.babiesonline.com/babies/a/ana%5Fj%5F2004/
My blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/querer-hijo-querer-hija/ 

MareCat - 24 Jul 2005 03:53 GMT
>>> Good Luck. I think that unless you confront them and lead a campaign
>>> to
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> front lawn, with the message "Breastmilk - perfected by God" and
> _then_ invite the news media ;-)

I like your idea more. ;)

Mary
Jess - 23 Jul 2005 16:13 GMT
> Went to church this evening with DD2, 5 weeks old.  It was a packed
> service and I had no choice but to sit next to a male. DD2 needed a feed,
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> legal right to do so. And if I am told to leave again I will probably
> leave the church for good.

I'd tell them that if they didn't like it, take it up with Mary. She
breastfed too. ;)

Jess
o_mom - 23 Jul 2005 19:26 GMT
I think this is the perfect situation for the "Jesus was Breastfed"
t-shirt... now if I could just remember where I put that link......
Ms Leebee - 24 Jul 2005 03:28 GMT
> I think this is the perfect situation for the "Jesus was Breastfed"
> t-shirt... now if I could just remember where I put that link......

http://www.cafepress.com/birthright.11454912

Signature

Babies are such nice ways to start people.

A & L Lane - 23 Jul 2005 21:51 GMT
> Went to church this evening with DD2, 5 weeks old.  It was a packed service
> and I had no choice but to sit next to a male. DD2 needed a feed, so I fed
> her, I didn't think twice about it.  After the service one of the paid staff
> of snipped...
I will continue to anyway as my understanding
> is that I have the legal right to do so. And if I am told to leave again I
> will probably leave the church for good.
>
> Cheri
> Mum to Sean and Jasmine (3years)
> Tara (5 weeks)

Definitely take this further - be polite but firm.  If they dont agree, then
maybe this is not the church for you.  Why do these people insist on being
offended by something like this - I would practically guarantee that you
would not have been showing more than a micro-millimetre of flesh so he
would have to have been trying pretty hard to see something he shouldnt.
Was the guy old or young?

This has never happened to me - that it has happened to you with 3 of your 4
times being in this church is a very telling fact - they seriously need some
education on this issue.

good luck
Leah
Jake Mysterio - 24 Jul 2005 03:18 GMT
The guy was in his late 20s i think, and the staff member said to me he is
single and we have to understand that single males look at breasts only as
sexual things.....well good for him but I am not going to stop bfing just
cause he doesnt realise what breasts are really for!

Cheri

>> Went to church this evening with DD2, 5 weeks old.  It was a packed
> service
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> good luck
> Leah
A & L Lane - 24 Jul 2005 04:38 GMT
> The guy was in his late 20s i think, and the staff member said to me he is
> single and we have to understand that single males look at breasts only as
> sexual things.....well good for him but I am not going to stop bfing just
> cause he doesnt realise what breasts are really for!
>
> Cheri

I dont understand that attitude - they have to understand that such
ridiculous attitudes need to be sorted out quick smart with some education.
Why was he looking at your breasts ?  Breastfeeding does not mean exposing
your breasts - it means feeding a hungry baby.  I think you need to donate
some artwork to this church - surely an appropriate poster of Madonna and
child is drastically needed there.

cheers
Leah
Ms Leebee - 24 Jul 2005 04:40 GMT
> The guy was in his late 20s i think, and the staff member said to me
> he is single and we have to understand that single males look at
> breasts only as sexual things.....

um, that's his/their issue, not yours.

He should repent for having such wicked thoughts anyway, lol.
Look who the sinner is - not you ;)
Irrational Number - 24 Jul 2005 07:20 GMT
> The guy was in his late 20s i think, and the staff member said to me he is
> single and we have to understand that single males look at breasts only as
> sexual things.....well good for him but I am not going to stop bfing just
> cause he doesnt realise what breasts are really for!

All the more reason to teach him because
one day he may have children and want them
breastfed.

I'm totally on your side!

-- Anita --
Inamorata - 24 Jul 2005 08:30 GMT
> The guy was in his late 20s i think, and the staff member said to me he is
> single and we have to understand that single males look at breasts only as
> sexual things.....well good for him but I am not going to stop bfing just
> cause he doesnt realise what breasts are really for!

What a right royal cockchop.
You dont have to understand anything
of the sort, what a load of rubbish.

And then they wonder why church numbers dwindle.

Inamorata

-Those that mind dont matter.
The ones that matter dont mind.
Kelly - 24 Jul 2005 21:46 GMT
> What a right royal cockchop.

You get me everytime.. I have spent the last 10 minutes giggling..
Signature

Kelly
Mummy to Emily (12 Aug 01) and Isabella (5 Dec 02)

Narelle - 23 Jul 2005 23:33 GMT
> Went to church this evening with DD2, 5 weeks old.  It was a packed service
> and I had no choice but to sit next to a male. DD2 needed a feed, so I fed
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> next to me very uncomfortable.
>snip bf story<
. And if I am told to leave again I
> will probably leave the church for good.
>
> Cheri
> Mum to Sean and Jasmine (3years)
> Tara (5 weeks)

Ask the minister if it would be ok to bottle feed the baby in your seat.
  More than likely he will say yes that is acceptable.  Then ask him
"So you prefer I do things mans way rather than God's way?"
N
Ms Leebee - 24 Jul 2005 03:29 GMT
> Ask the minister if it would be ok to bottle feed the baby in your
>   seat. More than likely he will say yes that is acceptable.  Then
> ask him "So you prefer I do things mans way rather than God's way?"

wow.
that's *good*

Signature

Babies are such nice ways to start people.

Sindy - 24 Jul 2005 06:29 GMT
> Ask the minister if it would be ok to bottle feed the baby in your seat.
>   More than likely he will say yes that is acceptable.  Then ask him "So
> you prefer I do things mans way rather than God's way?"
> N

That is brilliant !!! Very clever !!!

Sindy
Wife to 1
Mummy to Cooper
sm - 24 Jul 2005 00:57 GMT
> Went to church this evening with DD2, 5 weeks old.  It was a packed service
> and I had no choice but to sit next to a male. DD2 needed a feed, so I fed
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> next to me very uncomfortable.I was to angry to argue about it at the time
> but I will be contacting them in the next week.  

I think your anger is completely justified.  I hope you do contact them
about it.  Good luck.
michelle - 24 Jul 2005 05:23 GMT
>Anyway I have decided that even though they have told me not to
>feed in the main church area I will continue to anyway as my understanding
>is that I have the legal right to do so. And if I am told to leave again I
>will probably leave the church for good.

better they had told you to leave, then you could of resorted to the
discrimination act.

i would be really screaming at the minister, about this insulting
behaviour.
Jo - 24 Jul 2005 11:45 GMT
I hope you take up the advice to take this further - but please let us
know what happens!  Congratulations for realising you're in the right,
and not be a shrinking violet to please others. :)

Jo
Mum to William, 8 weeks old.
Jake Mysterio - 24 Jul 2005 13:51 GMT
I will take it further, I should have said something at the time but I was
too angry and I had a screaming baby to deal with as well, but I will
definately be contacting them probably in writing, that way I can get
accross some of the things that I would otherwise forget in the heat of the
moment. I am sure they would contact me after receiving it as I am sure they
would not want me to leave the church, particularly since  I am very
involved in the running of the preschooler program.

Cheri
Mum to Sean, Jasmine (3years)
Tara(5weeks)

> I hope you take up the advice to take this further - but please let us
> know what happens!  Congratulations for realising you're in the right, and
> not be a shrinking violet to please others. :)
>
> Jo
> Mum to William, 8 weeks old.
-db- - 25 Jul 2005 01:32 GMT
cheri,

as a male of the species, i'd have to say that i'm appalled by what has
happened to you.  you've been treated very poorly indeed.  you are
certainly not the criminal.  nor are you the person with the problem.

was it discrimination?  would you have been asked to move on if your
baby was being bottle fed?  if the answer was no, then i'd say it was
most definitely discrimination.  best to get a proper legal opinion on that.

i do like the "man's way" vs "god's way" argument used in this thread.
as for the "sh.tting is natural too" argument - what a load of toss!
where are the laws saying i can sh.t in public?

imho, if i had a choice of having a hungry baby next to me that will no
doubt cry or a quietly feeding baby; i know where i'd cast my vote.

definitely do put in a complaint; if not for yourself, then for others
who might have to put up with this sort of crap.

derek

as for mcdonalds... perhaps their objection was more along the lines of
patrons consuming foods not purchased on the premises ;)  but seriously,
maccas ought to know better.
JJ - 25 Jul 2005 04:37 GMT
Just wanted to say I certainly get why you're angry, and it makes me
angry even hearing about it.  I only had one bad NIP experience, on a
flight when DD was 3 months, and I was too insecure about the whole NIP
thing at the time to really stand up for myself and it still pisses me
off thinking about it.  I wrote the airline, but got a really lame
apology and will never fly USAir again.  But church is even worse-
these are supposed to be family oriented people who support you.  My
response now?

"Sorry, my daughter has inherited my mammalian condition, so she needs
to nurse on a regular basis.  Surely you can sympathize."

JJ
Chookie - 25 Jul 2005 07:00 GMT
> Went to church this evening with DD2, 5 weeks old.  It was a packed service
> and I had no choice but to sit next to a male. DD2 needed a feed, so I fed
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> was a mcdonalds) Now correct me if I am wrong but isnt against the law for
> them to tell me not to bf here in australia.

the fact that they've had the same reaction on other occasions tells me that
you either have a lot of work to do or you need to find somewhere more
baby-friendly.  Try talking to the minister.  In most cases they know what's
what -- it's the junior ones that don't.

I cannot imagine that happening in my church!  (Mine's a small suburban
church, with -- alas! -- too much room in the pews.  Are you anywhere near
Berala in Sydney? :-)

The guy next to you must have tried quite hard to get an eyeful!

Signature

Chookie -- Sydney, Australia
(Replace "foulspambegone" with "optushome" to reply)

"In Melbourne there is plenty of vigour and eagerness, but there is
nothing worth being eager or vigorous about."
Francis Adams, The Australians, 1893.

Jake Mysterio - 25 Jul 2005 08:21 GMT
Im in South East Melbourne, and we have just changed to Saturday evening
services from 6pm-7.30pm (instead of Sunday 9.30am) and since it has changed
the church has been packed, I used to be able to arrive only 5 minutes
before the service and could easily get a seat but on Saturday I arrived
10minutes prior and still only just got a seat, admittedly Shaun Hart was
preaching this week so that probably boosted the numbers.

Cheri

>> Went to church this evening with DD2, 5 weeks old.  It was a packed
>> service
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> The guy next to you must have tried quite hard to get an eyeful!
Ms Leebee - 25 Jul 2005 15:44 GMT
> Im in South East Melbourne, and we have just changed to Saturday evening
> services from 6pm-7.30pm (instead of Sunday 9.30am) and since it has
> changed the church has been packed, I used to be able to arrive only 5
> minutes before the service and could easily get a seat but on Saturday I
> arrived 10minutes prior and still only just got a seat, admittedly Shaun
> Hart was preaching this week so that probably boosted the numbers.

I had to google to find out who that was - lol ;)
Chookie - 26 Jul 2005 00:43 GMT
> > arrived 10minutes prior and still only just got a seat, admittedly Shaun
> > Hart was preaching this week so that probably boosted the numbers.
>
> I had to google to find out who that was - lol ;)

So did I -- if he were truly blessed he'd play League!

Signature

Chookie -- Sydney, Australia
(Replace "foulspambegone" with "optushome" to reply)

"In Melbourne there is plenty of vigour and eagerness, but there is
nothing worth being eager or vigorous about."
Francis Adams, The Australians, 1893.

Cat - 25 Jul 2005 11:05 GMT
Chookie skrev:

> I cannot imagine that happening in my church!  (Mine's a small suburban
> church, with -- alas! -- too much room in the pews.  Are you anywhere near
> Berala in Sydney? :-)

When we went to a christening talk with our minister/priest/vicar/can't
tell_the_difference she said: And as you are sitting up front you can
nurse as you like - you don't have to feel embarrassed as I'm the only
one to see and I like the sight (she was a grandmother at the time).

But again - this is Denmark where there are no BF laws. I don't think it
would be necessary. It would be like having a law that says it's legal
to breathe anywhere you please.

Tine, Denmark
Shell - 25 Jul 2005 21:53 GMT
> Chookie skrev:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Tine, Denmark

It's amazing how things are different in other parts of the world.  My DH is
from Denmark.  On our first date my son was about 7 months old.  I
reluctantly NIP right in front of him and he never flinched.  He continued
the conversation as if it was the most natural common thing.  Considering
this was our 1st date and we're both in the U.S., his reaction really
impressed me!  Not to assume, but I would expect American boys to cringe and
feel awkward if someone did that on the 1st date!

I'm expecting my 2nd and my DH's parents were just here for a month and it
never occured to them that I would bottle feed.  It was just assumed I would
breastfeed.

~Shell
Justin 7/12/00
Baby EDD Oct 25
IMB - 25 Jul 2005 22:13 GMT
>> Chookie skrev:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> and it never occured to them that I would bottle feed.  It was just
> assumed I would breastfeed.

Danes are a natural people :-)

Here, you can stay at the hospital with your firstborn until the bf is
working (or at the patient's hotel for free). The healthcare staff
associated with pregnancy and birth do a lot of work telling the women
about bf'ing. I have only heard about a woman one single time who
_choose_ not to bf (and she is pretty much in the defensive because that
is so unusual here).

Cofee shops here have claimed that nursing mothers are a problem. Not
because of the show of breasts or nipples but because whole mothers
groups would invade a café and sit there for hours not buying anything
and their children would crawl anywere and generally be so loud that
other customers fled.

Restaurants has protested over mothers, too. For changing dipers on the
tables in the restaurant!

So... I guess here in Denmark, the mothers have a solid grip on their
rights ;-)

Seriously, I think nothern europe tends to take  nudity a bit less
serious than USA. And that includes an occational nipple when bf.

Signature

Inger Marie Brunsgaard (from Denmark)
Please remove "nospam_" from my email adress if you reply to my message

Cat - 25 Jul 2005 22:39 GMT
Shell skrev:

> It's amazing how things are different in other parts of the world.  My DH is
> from Denmark.  On our first date my son was about 7 months old.  I
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> never occured to them that I would bottle feed.  It was just assumed I would
> breastfeed.

I don't know any adult males who haven't at some point or another seen a
nursing mother. And I've NEVER seen anybody cover baby or breast with
blankets or wear nursing clothes (in fact I've never seen any in a shop).

I guess your DH was just immunized from an early age on :-)

Apart from that: a nude breast is no big deal here.

Tine, Denmark
Ms Leebee - 26 Jul 2005 05:29 GMT
> I don't know any adult males who haven't at some point or another
> seen a nursing mother. And I've NEVER seen anybody cover baby or
> breast with blankets or wear nursing clothes (in fact I've never seen
> any in a shop).

I used a pashmina when I was out&about, but that was for my ease of comfort.
So soft and light and drapey, and looked nice too - made a nice little
blankie if he fell asleep in my arms, so it worked for us on many levels.

He still likes my pashmina :)
Sue - 26 Jul 2005 18:18 GMT
"Shell" <Lady_Arcadia@DuranDuran.com> wrote in message
>On our first date my son was about 7 months old.  I
> reluctantly NIP right in front of him and he never flinched.  He continued
> the conversation as if it was the most natural common thing.  Considering
> this was our 1st date and we're both in the U.S., his reaction really
> impressed me!  Not to assume, but I would expect American boys to cringe and
> feel awkward if someone did that on the 1st date!

I am sure they would cringe. However, I cannot imagine taking a baby or any
children for that matter on a first date.
Signature

Sue (mom to three girls)

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.