Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Pregnancy / Breastfeeding / February 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

when do you first weigh a baby?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Anne Rogers - 17 Feb 2006 09:58 GMT
Looking and Happy Hunters post and having had similar experience, of babies
not being weighed provided everything else is fine, I wondered what others
have experienced. Do they way babies daily in hospital? Do you visit the Ped
and get a weight check?

Anne
Sue - 17 Feb 2006 10:22 GMT
While I was in the hospital, yes, they weighed the babies daily. When we got
home, there is a well baby check that starts 2-3 days after being home and
then again at 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, etc. When we had weight problems
with DD3 we were going in for more frequent weight checks and I think that
was every 2-3 weeks. I would definite want the baby weighed soon after
birth, if nothing else but to know what it is to write in the baby book. I
cannot imagine not having the baby weighed.
Signature

Sue (mom to three girls)

> Looking and Happy Hunters post and having had similar experience, of babies
> not being weighed provided everything else is fine, I wondered what others
> have experienced. Do they way babies daily in hospital? Do you visit the Ped
> and get a weight check?
>
> Anne
Happy Hunter - 17 Feb 2006 11:16 GMT
> While I was in the hospital, yes, they weighed the babies daily. When we
> got
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>>
>> Anne

Just to clarify, DD3 was weighed at birth, but then not again until she was
13 days old (normally around 10 days old is the next weighing).

With DD2, she was weighed at birth, then 48 hours later (she lost a 1 lb),
then the next day as well, and the next....  But really, if the milk hasn't
come in, exatly what do they expect to happen !!! Nothing will happen until
the milk is in.

As Anne said, if everything else if fine, then after the initial birth
weighing, there shouldn't be any reason to weigh a baby until a good few
days later when the milk is in and things have settled down a bit.

As it happens, DD2s weight ran long the bottom end of the weight curve the
whole time she was a baby, and it did go beneath it as well. Now, she's a
very very slim and active 4 year old (wish I'd inherited the thin gene, she
doesn't get it from me !).

Cheers
Ailsa
Clisby - 17 Feb 2006 10:40 GMT
> Looking and Happy Hunters post and having had similar experience, of babies
> not being weighed provided everything else is fine, I wondered what others
> have experienced. Do they way babies daily in hospital? Do you visit the Ped
> and get a weight check?
>
> Anne

Both of mine were weighed within an hour or so of birth, and then just
before they left the hospital (less than 48 hours later).   I took each
to a pediatrician at about 1 week, and they were weighed again.

Clisby
Mary W. - 17 Feb 2006 12:21 GMT
> Looking and Happy Hunters post and having had similar experience, of babies
> not being weighed provided everything else is fine, I wondered what others
> have experienced. Do they way babies daily in hospital? Do you visit the Ped
> and get a weight check?

For my first, she was weighed at the hospital and again before we left
(3 days later, c-section). Her weight was fine but we were supplementing
due to lousy advice at the hospital. Second was weighed at the hospital
and then again on day 4 at the ped's. We went in to get her PKU test
done, since we left the hospital earlier than they wanted. That's when
the ped started talking about supplementing, but my milk had just come
in so I knew the baby would be fine. We came back 5 days later for
a recheck and she had put on 17 ounces!!!! I knew she was fine.

Mary W.
Leslie - 17 Feb 2006 13:19 GMT
Mine were weighed each day at the hospital.  Then they have the first
visit at the pediatrician's office within five days (IIRC) of birth.  I
tried to skip that one with Lorelei; I could see she was getting plenty
of milk and AFAIK it's to check for feeding problems and maybe
jaundice, and you should have seen how bent out of shape they got.

Leslie
Nikki - 17 Feb 2006 15:21 GMT
> Looking and Happy Hunters post and having had similar experience, of
> babies not being weighed provided everything else is fine, I wondered
> what others have experienced. Do they way babies daily in hospital?
> Do you visit the Ped and get a weight check?

I'm in the US and things vary but my experience is:

#1:  Weighed at birth, before we left the hospital at 3 days, and again at
his first appt. which was at 2 weeks.

#2:  Weighed at birth, before we left the next day, and again at the first
check up which was at 2 weeks.

Signature

Nikki
Hunter 4/99
Luke 4/01
Thing One and Thing Two :-) EDD 4/06

Anne Rogers - 17 Feb 2006 15:40 GMT
perhaps I should have said 2nd weigh check!

Both mine were weighed in the delivery room, but even with borderline
concerns about the 1st, he was lethargic and jaundiced, we just watched and
waited and fed and fed and fed. Weighed him at 13 days and was fine,
probably did dip below 2.5kg, but almost certainly not 10% of his body
weight.

Anne
CRCoupons.com - 17 Feb 2006 16:19 GMT
Our hospital had us weigh in at their clinic the first Tuesday after
she was born.  There was no reason to go back if it was considered
normal and of course, she was seen by her ped.

Kyle McPeck
kyle@mcpeck.com

President's Day Sale at BabyAge
http://www.crcoupons.com/babyage
Anne Rogers - 17 Feb 2006 18:21 GMT
> normal and of course, she was seen by her ped.

there is no "of course" about it, here in the UK, children don't have a
pediatrician, they just have a GP like an adult. For babies the only routine
checks are a 6 weeks, then again at 8 months (which reminds me, must book
Ada in for hers).

Anne
Marie - 17 Feb 2006 16:20 GMT
> Looking and Happy Hunters post and having had similar experience, of babies
> not being weighed provided everything else is fine, I wondered what others
> have experienced. Do they way babies daily in hospital? Do you visit the Ped
> and get a weight check?
>
> Anne

Here in the U.S., they had weighed DD at birth in the morning, again that
night, and the next night. B/c I was BF, they wanted me to have her weighed
at the Women's Center where the LCs are the week after our discharge. She
had her two-week checkup at the ped. Lots of weighing going on in that first
week, and she was just a normal baby without any complications. I wonder if
the hospital was too worried about my BF her.

At least, the ped was/is very laid back.
Gorgon Park - 17 Feb 2006 18:16 GMT
> Looking and Happy Hunters post and having had similar experience, of babies
> not being weighed provided everything else is fine, I wondered what others
> have experienced. Do they way babies daily in hospital? Do you visit the Ped
> and get a weight check?
>
> Anne

I am in Canada, so I think it is a bit different.

My daughter was weighed at birth, and just before we left, so day 2.
Then about 2 days after we were home (day 4) the community health nurse
came to visit.  The nurse weighed her in our home.  She came back every
couple of days to re-weigh, as she wasn't gaining, although not losing
either.  The health nurse comes as much or as little as you would like
her to and as we were somewhat nervous first-time parents, we had her
come fairly often until our daughter started gaining, which was at
about 9 days.  For the next one, I doubt I will have the baby weighed
as much.

The first doctor's appointment here is at one week, so we took her to
our doctor, who didn't weigh her because she was being followed closely
by the health nurse, but our doctor is laid back about stuff like that.

Stacey
mcmahan@cup.hp.com - 17 Feb 2006 18:58 GMT
: Looking and Happy Hunters post and having had similar experience, of babies
: not being weighed provided everything else is fine, I wondered what others
: have experienced. Do they way babies daily in hospital? Do you visit the Ped
: and get a weight check?

: Anne

Niel was weighed about a half hour after birth, then not again until his
2 mos WBC.

Larry
Chookie - 17 Feb 2006 21:30 GMT
> Looking and Happy Hunters post and having had similar experience, of babies
> not being weighed provided everything else is fine, I wondered what others
> have experienced. Do they way babies daily in hospital? Do you visit the Ped
> and get a weight check?

I think here, the *standard* weight checks are at birth, at hospital
discharge, and at Early Childhood Health Centre visits (it is also possible to
drop in to your ECHC to have the baby weighed between official visits).  In my
area, there is supposed to be a home visit by the nurses in the first week; I
presume there would be a weight check there too.

There certainly was a period at my ECHC where the staff didn't plot the weight
on the Blue Book graph, because parents were responding to low-but-healthy
weights by resorting to formula/solids, but they're back to plotting them
again.  (The Blue Book is a log-term record of your child's health, held by
the parents).

Signature

Chookie -- Sydney, Australia
(Replace "foulspambegone" with "optushome" to reply)

"... if *I* was buying a baby I'd jolly well make sure it was at
least a two-tooth!"  
Mary Grant Bruce, The Houses of the Eagle.

Anne Rogers - 18 Feb 2006 16:49 GMT
> I think here, the *standard* weight checks are at birth, at hospital
> discharge, and at Early Childhood Health Centre visits (it is also
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> week; I
> presume there would be a weight check there too.

are you assuming all checks involve a weight check? I had some kind of check
almost daily, though sometimes it was just a phone call, but no weight
checks until almost 2 weeks.

> There certainly was a period at my ECHC where the staff didn't plot the
> weight
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> by
> the parents).

ours is a red book!

Ann
Notchalk - 17 Feb 2006 22:20 GMT
> Looking and Happy Hunters post and having had similar experience, of
> babies not being weighed provided everything else is fine, I wondered
> what others have experienced. Do they way babies daily in hospital? Do
> you visit the Ped and get a weight check?
>
> Anne

In hospital here we weigh them at birth (or while they are still in
birthsuite), day 3 then day 5.

Jo
Signature

Woman, Wife, Mother, Midwife

Anne Rogers - 18 Feb 2006 16:54 GMT
> In hospital here we weigh them at birth (or while they are still in
> birthsuite), day 3 then day 5.

do you know the logic behind that? Is that for term, well infants?

Our hospital has some bad points and some good points, basically they really
minimally intervene for well, term infants, which means no routine weighings
post birth, but for all other infants, they then go crackers. I've chatted
to mums who have had low birth weight but term babies and then have them
weighed daily on the transitional care ward and then being stressed at
because the baby has lost weight and having to repeatedly point out "but my
milk hasn't come in yet". Then not letting them home, when literally the
only problem is the baby was small at delivery.  I can see the point when it
is a first child as you don't know what normal, is, but for experienced
mums, they really make life difficult, when they just want to go home and
get on with life!

Anne
Jess - 18 Feb 2006 16:31 GMT
>> In hospital here we weigh them at birth (or while they are still in
>> birthsuite), day 3 then day 5.
>
> do you know the logic behind that? Is that for term, well infants?

I think it's to get an idea of how much they weigh at birth and then again
after they've lost whatever "water weight" from the delivery. It might also
be to keep track of the really tiny babies, because the smallest ones have
extra risks with a lower weight.

Jess
Notchalk - 18 Feb 2006 22:10 GMT
>> In hospital here we weigh them at birth (or while they are still in
>> birthsuite), day 3 then day 5.
>
> do you know the logic behind that? Is that for term, well infants?

Ugh, you have to be kidding, right? Logic?? hehe

Every baby gets weighed at birth, day 3 and day 5.  These doctors are
control freaks and like to know exact numbers.  We are a baby friendly
hospital, but depending on which paed is on for the day, what happens
when a baby loses more than 10% and mum's milk isn't in yet.  Some say
just continue feeding 3 hourly and we always tell them the milk is on
the way, breasts are firming up, etc.  Others go down the formula topup
road and expressing after every 3 hourly feed.

If you're lucky enough to have one of these babies, you might even be
lucky enough to score a day 4 weight as well!  AND an extended hospital
stay, because of course you don't really know what you are doing and
don't really know how important it is that a baby be fed. *rolls eyes*

Jo
Signature

Woman, Wife, Mother, Midwife

Anne Rogers - 19 Feb 2006 00:40 GMT
> Ugh, you have to be kidding, right? Logic?? hehe

that was what I thought, I realise I was very lucky when I had my first,
there is a breastfeeding counsellor at our hospital 2 hrs per week, she was
there after DS was born, so instead of sending me to the formula cupboard
when he didn't eat, they sent her instead.

Also, I was on a drip in labour, so that probably pushed his weight over the
2.5kg mark, then by not being weighed on day 3 or whenever, we avoided him
ever being weighed at under 2.5kg, which he almost certainly must have been
at some point.

Sucessful breastfeeding for us that time was basically luck not judgement!

Anne
Lara - 19 Feb 2006 09:45 GMT
> We are a baby friendly hospital,
[snip]
> Some say
> just continue feeding 3 hourly and we always tell them the milk is on
> the way, breasts are firming up, etc.  Others go down the formula topup
> road and expressing after every 3 hourly feed.

BFH and 3 hourly schedules? I don't quite understand.

Lara
Notchalk - 19 Feb 2006 10:47 GMT
>> We are a baby friendly hospital,
> [snip]
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Lara

That's for a baby who has lost more than 10%, not just any baby.  We
have a demand feeding policy, but no longer than 6 hours between feeds.

Jo
Signature

Woman, Wife, Mother, Midwife

Anne Rogers - 19 Feb 2006 17:44 GMT
> That's for a baby who has lost more than 10%, not just any baby.  We have
> a demand feeding policy, but no longer than 6 hours between feeds.

ho ho, no wonder they got a bit panicy with me and DS, he slept for about 10
hrs straight!

fwiw, so did Ada, but we were at home, so no one fussed us, I understand
this is a quite normal reaction to being born

Anne
Linz - 20 Feb 2006 09:28 GMT
>> That's for a baby who has lost more than 10%, not just any baby.  We
>> have a demand feeding policy, but no longer than 6 hours between
>> feeds.
>
> ho ho, no wonder they got a bit panicy with me and DS, he slept for
> about 10 hrs straight!

Yup, here too, except without the panic. YoungBloke born at 11.30am, didn't
feed till about 8pm. Which was a shame because they didn't want to let us
home till he'd fed. This was a certified breast-feeding friendly hospital
and they wanted to make sure that we got off to a good start with BF, good
latch etc. They knew I didn't want to spend my first night with him in
hospital so they did everything they could to persuade him to wake up and
nurse - expressing colostrum, undressing him, tickling his feet - and he
wasn't having any of it... I was on their side, I too wanted to get BF off
to a good start, so I didn't discharge myself, but oooh, if only he'd woken
up two hours earlier!
websage - 21 Feb 2006 20:16 GMT
Interesting to see the variations in experience -

Our daughter was 5 weeks last Friday. We moved into Hebden Bridge area,
in West Yorkshire a month before she was born and a bit nervous to be
changing the area we had gone thro all the preliminaries in. We had
also seen the 'hue and cry' in National Press when the Royal Calderdale
Hospital supposedly 'banned people smiling at babies' ( a very silly
media storm-in-a -eacup - as it turned out!)

Therefore we are only too happy to say what a completely wonderful
service we have experienced since we arrived here:

>From the midwife-team, to the ante-natal classes, to the help on the
'big day' from 3.30 am still hoping for a home-birth...through to
9.30/10 am when it became necessary to go to hospital - to the Royal
Calderdale midwife (so young!) who was also superb. When the baby
arrived at 1.30pm - she was (as we thought traditional) - weighed an
hour or so later - after a lovely opportunity for me to hold the baby
whilst awaiting delivery of the placenta. By 8pm after a quick trip
home to empty the under-used 'birthing pool' - my husband returned and
'we' were discharged.

Afetr the birth - the midwives continued with their incredible service
- we could have seen them every day if we had wanted, for the first 30
days of our baby's life. As it was they came out once or twice a week -
until we could go down to the drop-in session (only delayed by us being
slow getting hold of a car seat for the little one!!). They were all so
lovely and helpful, understanding - and helped put our 'first time
parent' minds at rest about every lttle concern we had. After the first
day or two of agony getting the milk flowing - getting the
'latching-on' sorted - getting the angle of delivery right - and
recovering from some 'soreness' - the B/F came right and has been a
wonderful experience which I fully intend to continue for the first
year.

The little one was weighed again about 9/10 day old - and having
several ounces from her birth weight - we were assured that this was
just perectly normal (especialy as the 'flow' for the first 3 days had
seemed negligible - but apparently perfectly normal - even though the
amounts of colostrum must have been miniscule!).

As the Mid-wives phased out the 'Health Vistors' phased in. Again both
lovely women who have been very supportive and encouraging. The little
one was weighed again about 20 days - and was almost back to birth
weight - and again last week, at just over one month - having put on
almost two and a half pounds.

We were interested to hear that breast-fed children put weight on more
slowly (would say 'more naturally') - and that 'formula'
supplementation can be negative because it can can lead to the breast
milk stopping due to the lower demand - plus - one has to wonder at the
fact that 'man-made' milk (rather than 'mum-made') usually results in
faster weight gain - for us this seems the start of a slippery slope of
fat-baby/fat-toddler/fat-child/fat-adult! The price we pay for being
all too ready to introduce 'ready made' solutions as far as food goes
from as soon as day1 in a persons life!

What really comes home to us - as rather late starters with this
'family' thing - is that thanks to the brilliant support of the Midwife
Team and the Health Visitors here in West Yorkshire - we have felt
totally assured at all times, and educated about the wide spectrum of
what is considered normal for the first few weeks of a baby's life.

We are also heartened by the great support to get started successfully
with B/F and stick to it without supplements or unneccessary
alternatives - for as long as the milk flows, and the baby is happy
(naturally we also recognize that sometimes Mums may not be able to
provide milk - and in these cases then it is thankful that there are
some products around that can help).

The only time in the process of the birth, and the aftermath, that we
were at all 'under pressure' was when we were visited 3 times in about
3/4 of an hour by the 'baby doctors' - trying to persuade us to accept
a VitaminK jab (but it was our preference to rely on nature - and Mum's
milk - and decline this 'sledge-hammer to crack a walnut approach to
the issue of  Infant Haemorragic Syndrome or whatever this very-low
incidence problem is called!!). Once again the Midwives were very
supportive over this issue. (Just as the Health Visitors have been in
our early discussion about our lack of belief in vaccination.)

It seems to us that whilst weighing a baby at birth can confirm those
little ones that are way below acceptable birth-weight - and allows
monitoring of their gains and progress - that weight is otherwise such
a variable issue - there is no real wrong/right or perfect level of
progress - and generally little need for frequent weighing. As long as
a baby actually grows (which I think 'Mum' can tell both instinctively,
and practically, from the day-to-day changes that are so noticeable
during these early times).

Sorry, I probably got carried away here - but I was just inspired to
give credit where it is due - and in a UK National Health system that
is much criticised, and much maligned - especially by our 'bad news
media' - I wanted to say the system of support for expectant and new
mothers (and fathers) here in Hebden Bridge  - is absolutely fantastic!
All the professionals we have met have been dedicated individuals, with
great empathy and caring skills - or is it now called 'emotional
intelligence' - They have been there for us at any time - and have been
pro-active at keeping in touch and ensuring all was A-OK - As I say -
absolutely fantastic.

Ruth
Linz - 22 Feb 2006 09:04 GMT
> Interesting to see the variations in experience -
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Calderdale Hospital supposedly 'banned people smiling at babies' ( a
> very silly media storm-in-a -eacup - as it turned out!)

*waves* from Walsden, just down the road. Calderdale midwives are *ace* -
mine really worked with me to get a home birth until the point where it was
obvious that YoungBloke wasn't shifting and I'd run out of push, then they
came with me to the hospital, stayed throughout the delivery, and took
OldBloke back home later so they could collect their kit and he could get
the car. They visited, as you said, regularly, and the HVs have been v
supportive of breastfeeding - mine is thrilled that I'm still going at 2
years plus. I think we're lucky to live in such a good area, when I hear
from other people.

Like your baby, YB was weighed about an hour after the birth and then again
when he had his heel prick a few days later. He lost nearly 10% of his
birthweight but there was no panic, just a confirmation that I was doing the
right thing by feeding him. Next time he was weighed, around 10 days old,
he'd gained a pound, and after that I chose to have him weighed not for
peace of mind but because I was so astounded that he could gain so much in
so short a space of time!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.