Setting one's self up for failure?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
cjra - 07 Aug 2006 16:29 GMT I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so often that they will 'try breastfeeding and if it doesn't go well, stop."
Now, normally I'm all for trying and being realistic. But at least for me, such an attitude would have doomed us to failure. Thanks to being a lurker here for years, I was fully prepared for the difficulties. My attitude was "it WILL work. We WILL work through the difficult parts." Anything else seemed to be accepting defeat before even trying.
Is that just me? Did you find the 'I will try and see" attitude worked for you? Especially when it was difficult at first?
Now, I will add this group also h as a lot of people who say they will bf for 4 weeks then switch to formula. And many who say they tried and couldn' tbecause they didn't have enough milk, baby wasn't gaining weight, all-knowing doc/nurse told them to supplement, milk didn't come in until day 5 so the nurses said they had to supplement with formula so baby won't starve. etc.
npardue@indiana.edu - 07 Aug 2006 17:19 GMT > I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > attitude was "it WILL work. We WILL work through the difficult parts." > Anything else seemed to be accepting defeat before even trying. I think most women who say things like this are women who don't really want to breastfeed. Because they know that it's best, and their doctors encourage them to try, they 'try', but quickly find lots of good reasons to stop. (And, in turn, many peds, while they do give lip-service to 'breast is best', are perfectly happy to encourage such women to stop if they have any difficulties. "Well, you tried your best. Not all women can breastfeed and your baby will do fine on formula. Here are some samples to get you started.)
> Is that just me? Did you find the 'I will try and see" attitude worked > for you? Especially when it was difficult at first? I knew I was going to breastfeed. Couldn't think of a damned reason not to, and dozens of reasons to do it. So I did. (Of course that's not denying that SOME women have a hard time, but the great majority can succeed if they want to and have good help and advice.)
Naomi
> Now, I will add this group also h as a lot of people who say they will > bf for 4 weeks then switch to formula. And many who say they tried and > couldn' tbecause they didn't have enough milk, baby wasn't gaining > weight, all-knowing doc/nurse told them to supplement, milk didn't come > in until day 5 so the nurses said they had to supplement with formula > so baby won't starve. etc. Sarah Vaughan - 08 Aug 2006 14:42 GMT >> I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, >> where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > doctors encourage them to try, they 'try', but quickly find lots of > good reasons to stop. That may well be true for some women, but I think what motivates a lot of women who say this is that they don't want to feel like a failure, and they'll feel that way if they've built themselves up to think of breastfeeding as something important and then can't manage it. So they guard against that by not thinking about it as too big a deal.
I don't know if there's that much that can be done to change people's views on that, but I do think that a huge part of the problem is the militant type of breastfeeding advocacy that makes women feel as though they're doing something terrible by formula-feeding - I think quite a few women feel they don't even want to get drawn into this mindset. I also think that at least some of the problem is that pro-breastfeeding advertising stresses the "exclusive breastfeeding for six months" so much that people get the impression that it's all or nothing. I'd love to see much more emphasis put on the fact that *any* amount of breastfeeding is beneficial to the baby, and the more the better. Hopefully, that would persuade more women to be willing to take one day or one week at a time rather than assuming that if it doesn't work out, then that's that.
All the best,
Sarah
 Signature http://www.goodenoughmummy.typepad.com
"That which can be destroyed by the truth, should be" - P. C. Hodgell
cjra - 08 Aug 2006 14:50 GMT > That may well be true for some women, but I think what motivates a lot > of women who say this is that they don't want to feel like a failure, > and they'll feel that way if they've built themselves up to think of > breastfeeding as something important and then can't manage it. So they > guard against that by not thinking about it as too big a deal. That sounds reasonable. This came up ebcause someone said it was unrealistic to say you'd BF for X amount of time and that was setting one's self up for failure. Whereas for me personally, it was the opposite.
I think what made me wonder more is that there are *so many* women on that group who say they 'tried and couldn't do it" because they 'didn't have enough milk' or similar. Then say they tried for 2 days. Or one couldn't possibly know how much they suffered because their kid was starving/screaming etc. Those are the same women telling others to not set goals.
Anne Rogers - 08 Aug 2006 22:07 GMT >. I'd love to see much more emphasis put on the fact that *any* amount of >breastfeeding is beneficial to the baby, and the more the better. >Hopefully, that would persuade more women to be willing to take one day or >one week at a time rather than assuming that if it doesn't work out, then >that's that. I'd also agree with this, there is so little information out there about mixed feeding, so people don't know the facts, many doctors, health visitors etc. will happily suggest 1 bottle of formula, but not providing the information about how this might affect supply.
I've come across a lot of women who think they have to wean before return to work, for various reasons, some thinking it is not possible to give formula during the day time and breastfeed other times, some thinking that it is not worth giving the baby that bit of breastmilk, others thinking that problems such as leakage or engorgement are going to be with them the whole time of breastfeeding.
If there was good information available, then at least people would be able to make an informed decision.
I was also struck by what a friend said, she had twins born at 34 weeks, she breastfed them exclusively until 5 weeks then decided she could not go on. No one suggested to her that she could have mixed fed rather than stopping completely, or what she later thought might have been better, continuing to feed the twin who was good at breastfeeding and stopping the one that was causing so many of the problems, some people might think this was outrageous, but would have been very workable for her at that time and would at least have given one the benefit of breastmilk and probably the other too had she pumped at all.
Anne
Caledonia - 07 Aug 2006 17:22 GMT > Now, normally I'm all for trying and being realistic. But at least for > me, such an attitude would have doomed us to failure. Thanks to being a [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Is that just me? Did you find the 'I will try and see" attitude worked > for you? Especially when it was difficult at first? I find the 'try and see' attitude, in general, to be very successful for me. For nursing, I would have been overwhelmed to say, "I will nurse for the first 2.5 years of my child's life" -- breaking it into pieces, such as "I will get through nursing and pumping today -- all I have to do is pump 20 oz. today at work, and nurse tonight, then evaluate tomorrow," made it work for me (to reach the 2.5 year mark).
Ditto drug-free labor ("just have to get through next 10 minutes without drugs"), saving money ("only x amount per day, every day"), and other long-term goals. I think for me, the thing I need to do is attain low goals and keep building on them; setting the bar high with a long-term mindset I typically find really depressing. YMMV.
Caledonia
Donna Metler - 07 Aug 2006 18:05 GMT Well, I thought I was prepared for everything, and then I ended up with a child who just plain couldn't nurse. The "try and see" focus is the only reason I've been able to pump-because if I had felt, on day 1, when I was in tears trying to pump with a hand pump, that this was it for the next two years, I'd have quit right then.
But, I could say "OK, I'll try the electric pump for a week (the first rental), and then "well, let's renew for a month", and then, "we've made it to 6 weeks, let's keep going". So I had goals-1 week, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year. Currently I've been pumping 20 months-and plan to make it to age 2 with Alli getting at least some breast milk. But it took those intermediate goals to get there.
 Signature Donna DeVore Metler Orff Music Specialist/Kindermusik Mother to Angel Brian Anthony 1/1/2002, 22 weeks, severe PE/HELLP And Allison Joy, 11/25/04 (35 weeks, PIH, Pre-term labor)
NBennett - 07 Aug 2006 17:41 GMT try and see worked for me. i had some very militant breastfeeding friends and i bristle at the thought of being talked into and guilted into things. i knew i wanted to breastfeed but i didn't want the friend who was breastfeeding her 4 yr old to get too cozy with my plan. i told everyone i was going to try for 6 months, then see how it went. it turns out my daughter was born with severe heart defects, had surgery at 5 days and was hospitalized for 2 weeks. there were lots of opportunities for doctors or nurses to convince me that formula was best for any number of reasons but no one tried and i continued with my plan. (btw, this is not to say they didnt accidentally on purpose screw up and give her formula when i wasnt around. i chalked it up to laziness in not checking her file and time saving in their busy days) my friends also had the good sense to back off and not pressure me. we had no problems with breastfeeding. no latch issues, no supply issues, no contrary doctors. at 6 months, things were going well so there was no reason to stop. i decided to try to continue and see how it went. maybe go till i returned to work. at 9 months i returned to work. my body and my baby both adjusted quickly to an evening and mornings schedule. no pumping, homo milk during the day. with her 1st birthday came a second surgery. i wasn't going to take away one of the few comforts i could offer her during her hospital stay, so breastfeeding continued. at 19 months it stopped working so well for me. i disliked being undressed in public by a hungry toddler. that was my personal line. i decided to wean her using the same try and see method. i'd cut out the second morning feed and the second evening feed. that went fine. so i cut the first evening feed. still fine. so i cut the morning feed. also fine. the last to go was the nurse to sleep feed, but one day i skipped it in our evening routine. she went happily to sleep. and that was the end of our breastfeeding, no turning back. so at every step, i had an idea of what i wanted but none of it was ever etched in stone. it wasnt baby-led, but it was baby-accommodating. if at any point she'd objected, i would have altered my path. wait and see worked for us. but i know what you mean. i agree with you though, a lot of people who approach breastfeeding with a wait and see attitude are giving themselves and easy out or a planned escape hatch. nancy
> I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > in until day 5 so the nurses said they had to supplement with formula > so baby won't starve. etc. Anne Rogers - 07 Aug 2006 18:08 GMT >I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > in until day 5 so the nurses said they had to supplement with formula > so baby won't starve. etc. I'm entirely 100% convinced you are correct, I was exactly the same, when other people I knew who were having babies were buying bottles and sterilisers just in case and had a supply of formula cartons, all I had bought was breastpads and nipple cream. I was going to breastfeed and that was that. I also knew that with 24hr supermarkets that if there was a genuine emergency, with the exception of midnight to 11am and 5pm to midnight on a Sunday we could have formula and a bottle available within half an hour, but I figured that having to go out and get it was enough of a buffer if we did go through a difficult patch. My experience of breastfeeding has been a bit wierd, problem free for 6 weeks, couldn't see what all the fuss was about, then everything under the sun thrown at us after that, but here we are, I'm feeding number 2 at the moment who is currently 14 months, no plans to stop.
Anne
lonelns@yahoo.com - 07 Aug 2006 18:17 GMT > I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so > often that they will 'try breastfeeding and if it doesn't go well, > stop." De-lurking here. While I knew that breastfeeding was good, I was kind of ambivelent about it prior to having DD but after doing alot of research decided that I should definitely try. (If it makes a difference I was an older first time mom (38 when DD was born).
> Now, normally I'm all for trying and being realistic. But at least for > me, such an attitude would have doomed us to failure. Thanks to being a [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Is that just me? Did you find the 'I will try and see" attitude worked > for you? Especially when it was difficult at first? What I found to be more constructive was to commit to small goals rather than just leave it as vague as "I'll try and see" and I'd offer that as a suggestion to anyone starting out with that attitude.
I had read and heard enough that the first six weeks especially is often difficult so to decided that no matter what I would nurse for 6 weeks and then evaluate. I did have a fairly low point at about 2 weeks with a bleeding and painful nipple but got really good assistance from the LC at my pediatricians office and got through it.
Once I got past the six week growth spurt, things were easier and so set the goal to make it three months and then evaluate. At three months I set the goal to six months. By the time I got to six months, switching to formula seemed like a lot more bother and I set my next goal to 1 year.
At a year I didn't bother setting a goal and she ended up weaning at 24 months. I never would have thought I'd have nursed anywhere that long when we first started ( 2 years seemed like an eternity starting out).
Leslie - 07 Aug 2006 20:29 GMT > What I found to be more constructive was to commit to small goals > rather than just leave it as vague as "I'll try and see" and I'd offer > that as a suggestion to anyone starting out with that attitude. I agree with this. I think that everyone else who has posted who has said they would try and see, really meant they would *commit* for short periods of time, and then see, which is different.
IOW, the OP is talking about people who have not committed to exclusive bf for even one day. When there is no commitment, failure is more likely. That's not the same thing as saying that you WILL bf for the first week, then evaluate from there.
Leslie
cjra - 08 Aug 2006 00:50 GMT > > What I found to be more constructive was to commit to small goals > > rather than just leave it as vague as "I'll try and see" and I'd offer [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Leslie Thanks for the perspectives. I was interpreting the comments on the other board as lack of commitment, but maybe there's more there.
Dagny - 07 Aug 2006 18:45 GMT >I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so > often that they will 'try breastfeeding and if it doesn't go well, > stop." I do think this is *generally* a less successful approach to nursing.
I'm about to make a slightly strained analogy so bear with me and suggest a better one if you can. If a teenager believes, from his family or on his own, church, whatever, that alcohol is bad, wrong, etc. and he WILL not drink, he's less likely to never take a first drink.
Now -- is alcohol bad and wrong? I don't think so. My kids won't grow up with that message, and I would expect some naughtiness to ensue in the teenage years.
So some of us start with the idea that nursing is the only way and formula is a bad idea. Maybe those few of us who fail, fail the emotionally hard way. But I'd bet more of our babies are nursed for longer.
The fact is, given the opportunity, nursing works out very well the vast majority of the time. Like birth. It cannot be otherwise. We are mammals.
I never contemplated weaning an infant. I'm contemplating weaning some toddlers on a daily basis, but I digress.
MareCat - 07 Aug 2006 19:27 GMT > Is that just me? Did you find the 'I will try and see" attitude worked > for you? Especially when it was difficult at first? That was pretty much my attitude when my DD was born. I was a first-time mom who knew only the very basics of b/fing (mainly the various b/fing holds and many of the benefits of b/fing). Most people I knew IRL had b/fed for six months or less. I was determined to try b/fing DD and was just hoping to make a go of it for at least a short time. In preparation for her coming home from the hospital, we hadn't bought any formula, but we did take the formula samples home with us "just in case." At first, I had set a goal of b/fing for at least a month. After I met that goal, I moved it out to three months. Once my supply and her demand evened out (at around 3-4 months or so), and things got *much* easier, I knew that we would be b/fing for a long time to come (I had no idea back then that we would be going until after she turned three!).
I must say that things were *very* difficult when she was a newborn. She never seemed satisfied with my supply and would scream at the breast on a nightly basis. (Out of desperation, we did give in a couple of times and try a bottle with formula, but fortunately for us, she refused all bottles.) She also had reflux. I started lurking in here and gathered tons of information. I really believe that this group is what "saved" me. I think an awful lot of people just don't have the support and/or information they need to establish and maintain a good b/fing relationship. I certainly wasn't expecting it to be so hard in the beginning, and without the information I received from this group, I might very well have thrown in the towel early on, not knowing how much better and easier things would get just a short time later.
Now that I'm expecting twins, it's a whole other ballgame. Of course I'm going to try to b/f them exclusively, but we'll see how it goes.
Mary
 Signature Mommy to Rayna 1/20/03 Daughters #2 and 3 to make their grand entrance into the world on 9/25/06!
Anne Rogers - 08 Aug 2006 00:57 GMT > Now that I'm expecting twins, it's a whole other ballgame. Of course I'm > going to try to b/f them exclusively, but we'll see how it goes. I think you've given your own advice earlier in your post, commit to breastfeeding them for a certain amount of time, maybe just 2 weeks if thats what you feel happy with, educate yourself on twin nursing, including expressing, remembering that expressing in the early days is quite different to later expressing, many people find expressing colostrum is easier by hand, for example.
Anne
lucy-lu - 07 Aug 2006 20:25 GMT > I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > in until day 5 so the nurses said they had to supplement with formula > so baby won't starve. etc. When I was first pg, I really didn't want to breastfeed tbh. There was a hole lot of reasons, and I just wasn't into the idea. I bought bottles, sterilisers etc, but no formula as I wanted to wait til nearer the birth. Then, when I turned 6 months pg, my milk arrived, which freaked me out, as I really didn't expect it to. However, once I got over the shock, I decided my body obviously knew what it was doing and I would give breastfeeding a try, and when DD was born, that's exactly what I did. I'm glad I was never determined though, as (partly thanks to the midwife at the hospital who told me not to let Jessica snack, and that she must have set feed times from birth!) the first few weeks were so tough and I had to express and eventually supplement. Had I been determined, I would have felt a total failure, which the community midwife tried to make me feel like the next day anyway. My back hurt from feeding in the wrong position, my hand hurt from hand expressing (my manual pump was useless) and I didn't know to "sandwich" behind the nipple when my boobs were really big and engorged and she was too little to feed. Having now worked through all these issues, I'm happily breastfeeding totally. I'm aiming for 6 months, and will see where we're at when deciding to continue - If I go on further than that, fantastic, but if I'm supplementing again by then, then I know I'll have at least have given her the best possible start. As for when I have #2, I'll have a better idea of what I'm doing, but I still won't set my expectations too high.
Interesting question though :) I've enjoyed reading other people's replies :)
Lucy
Anne Rogers - 08 Aug 2006 00:52 GMT > When I was first pg, I really didn't want to breastfeed tbh. There was a > hole lot of reasons, and I just wasn't into the idea. I bought bottles, [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > felt a total failure, which the community midwife tried to make me feel > like the next day anyway. One could argue, however, that had you been committed, you would have either been educated, or followed your instincts, and fed the baby on demand, having set feed times from birth has been off the cards for quite a long time now and all the free stuff that gets dumped on you in the UK all say feed the baby on demand. Had you made the decision that you were nursing no matter what, that first bottle may never have happened, I had problems with my first, he had a weak suck and my supply dropped, I would often nurse him for 2hrs, switching side every 15 minutes. In some ways for me committing to breastfeed was really committing not to give formula, so if baby was hungry it was me he was having, my suspicion is that had you been determined you would have been a success and that is exactly what you are, you've been determined to go back to breastfeeding exclusively and you have!
Anne
hschinske@mouse-potato.com - 07 Aug 2006 20:42 GMT > I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > attitude was "it WILL work. We WILL work through the difficult parts." > Anything else seemed to be accepting defeat before even trying. I think "try and see" can mean very different things coming from different people. Lots of responses mention setting specific goals before giving up, sometimes very short goals. I think that's a realistic way of really TRYING. Lots of folks mean by "try and see" that they aren't going to go on with breastfeeding unless they find it's really far easier than they thought, which is quite a different matter. It's like saying "I'm going to put my foot in so that I know whether the water is too cold before I decide whether to swim." Well, you can't always tell by just putting your foot in. It's more realistic to say "I'm going to get wet all over and swim a stroke or two before I conclude that it really is far too cold, because I know it almost always seems cold just at first." Whether you do the latter by going in gradually, or diving off the dock, is probably more a matter of personality than anything else.
In my case, I started off with twins, so I knew there might potentially be some difficulties and complications. I told myself that I was going to do my darndest for a specific period of time (six weeks, barring medical emergencies), and then if I did have to give up, I would know absolutely that it hadn't been my fault, I'd given it everything I had in me at that time, and thank goodness formula is reasonably safe these days. If I'd had a singleton first, I don't think I would have thought so much about the "what if I have to use formula," because singletons are less risk and less stress, so it was inherently less likely that I'd need to go that way. I'd probably have been more inclined to just muddle through without setting any specific goals (which might or might not have worked out as well, dunno).
It depends on whether they're coming from the perspective that there's a choice to be made at all, really, as if it were a matter of which school district to buy a house in. To me, the process went something like, well, if you can breastfeed, the obvious thing is to breastfeed. If you can't breastfeed, then the obvious thing is to give formula. What choice?
Of course I'm exaggerating for effect there; in real life there are gray areas, centering on what "can't" might look like in your particular situation.
--Helen
Nikki - 08 Aug 2006 01:13 GMT >I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so > often that they will 'try breastfeeding and if it doesn't go well, > stop." That worked for me but then I meant it. I really was going to try. I wasn't just saying to get people to back off.
 Signature Nikki, mama to Hunter 4/99 Luke 4/01 Brock 4/06 Ben 4/06
Irrational Number - 08 Aug 2006 06:50 GMT > I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so > often that they will 'try breastfeeding and if it doesn't go well, > stop." That's me! I told DH I would BF for two months and that was it. I told him I would never pump at work, that's just not me. I bought formula before I had the baby. Who knew I'd nurse and pump Pillbug for 17 months and am now on month 14 with Rocky???
Pediatrician, this newsgroup, and the pumpmoms mailing list made all the difference!
-- Anita --
Irrational Number - 08 Aug 2006 06:51 GMT > I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so > often that they will 'try breastfeeding and if it doesn't go well, > stop." Just remembered, SIL lending me her pump also made a big difference.
-- Anita --
Teej - 08 Aug 2006 10:17 GMT My daughter was early and tiny (4lbs) so was put straight on formula and taken to high dependancy unit. She only had a brief few hours stay there before coming to me, but hospital were more biased towards continuing her on formula than getting me to feed. Was day 3 before eventually got somebody to sit and show me how to feed her (I did ask for help but kept getting forgotten, and what with it being first baby and all a big shock i didn't push it, but with hindsight i should have). Started feeding her a few minutes before each feed then following up with formula. This carried on for first few months. By week 14 i had weaned her completely off formula and onto breast. But first 6wks were hard. Kept thinking "would be much easier to just stick with formula", but perservered. For me, best way was to take it one day at a time. Not nice to think when you have a newborn "right, 6mths of breastfeeding to come" as is very daunting. But day by day is a good approach. I am proud that i stuck with it and weaned her off formula. I have just weaned her off breast completely, she is 15mths. So many people I speak to say "oh, it was too hard for me" and had given up by the first day. I think that some people do have reasons why they can't feed, but i think that in some cases the reason "too hard" is used when really mums want to say " i prefer to bottle feed". Mums shouldn;t feel bad for picking formula because it suits them.
> I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > in until day 5 so the nurses said they had to supplement with formula > so baby won't starve. etc. jeni_steers@yahoo.co.uk - 08 Aug 2006 10:46 GMT Personally I don't think you can make general statements about anyone's level of commitment because there are so many factors involved in each person's decision you can't cover them all in one blanket.
For me I said I would try to bf but not get stressed about it if it didn't work. As it turned out I fought through cracked and split nipples, horrible let-down pain, bad latch, sleepy baby, late milk coming in and more to get to where I am now. But had you asked me before whether I would have gone that far I would have been doubtful as I don't do pain well:). What got me through was m yown bloodymindedness and good advice, what hacked me off was militancy and bad advice.
Jeni
tami - 08 Aug 2006 11:50 GMT Breastfeeding hurt for almost the first two weeks. I had to really clench my teeth whenever my son latched on. One nipple even bled in the first week when he bit down accidentally when I was trying to withdraw, and my sister-pediatrician said, keep on breastfeeding through the pain. When my son had a stomach virus and kept pooing after each feed, my sister said, keep it up, breastfeeding is his first line of defense. So I had been conditioned to breastfeed and there was no alternative. I think that because of that, I continued. Now breastfeeding is the best part of my day. He has just turned one and I can't pump enough milk at work to feed him so I am trying formula out of necessity. But I will still pump and then BF when I get home. I really enjoy it!
> I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > in until day 5 so the nurses said they had to supplement with formula > so baby won't starve. etc. Irene - 08 Aug 2006 16:30 GMT > I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so > often that they will 'try breastfeeding and if it doesn't go well, > stop." Well, I agree with the others that it really so depends on the person and the experience. Before you have kids, it is sooo hard to have any idea what it's really going to be like, esp. when you get conflicting reports all over the place! And of course, it *is* different for each mom/baby(babies). You can get this idea in your head of what it's going to be like, and so much of it just flies out the window once you actually have a baby! I've read so many stories about moms who expected this instant bond via bf, and were disenchanted when it wasn't this purely magical experience. Or the moms who were just willing to give it a try - and when it worked, it was suddenly, well, a magical experience. And when things don't go smoothly - is it perceived as a challenge to overcome, or as an insurmountable thing and a good reason to quit and go to bottles?
Of course, good advice and good support are crucial, as well as attitude - but it's sometimes hard to know what will motivate someone. (Confession - one of my motivations was to do better than my SIL who started combi-feeding very early on through lack of support - competitive nature strikes again!)
Irene
Cheri Stryker - 08 Aug 2006 18:47 GMT > I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Is that just me? Did you find the 'I will try and see" attitude worked > for you? Especially when it was difficult at first? This actually makes me quite sad. There's a lot of pressure out there for younger people, in that so many of them have conflicting messages. They were most likely bottle fed, so they've likely got the parents giving "good enough for you" messages. But then there's a lot of pressure out there to breast feed - complete with the overtones of "you're a failure if you don't", combined with the "crunchy earth mother" overtones. Honestly, I think that the impression that breastfeeding is for "hippies", might be doing the most harm.
I really never considered bottle feeding as an option, simply because it's such a pain - I didn't have a dishwasher when my first was born, and the thought of trying to get that many bottles clean and sterile made suffering through any amount of thrush pain much more attractive.
Education is definitely an issue, but I think just seeing it first hand, and talking about it with a currently breastfeeding mother is the best kind.
On a somewhat related note, I've been horrified lately, with the recent heat wave, and our just average 90 degree days, to see just how many women fix up a bottle and leave it in the stroller with the baby, for HOURS. I've even seen a few on the bus (a 45 min. trip for me, and they were already on) who have one bottle in with the baby, and 2 or 3 more underneath, just sitting there, curdling. BLECH!
 Signature Cheri Stryker
mom to DS1 - 7 yrs, and DS2 - 5.5 months
cjra - 08 Aug 2006 19:11 GMT > On a somewhat related note, I've been horrified lately, with the recent > heat wave, and our just average 90 degree days, to see just how many > women fix up a bottle and leave it in the stroller with the baby, for > HOURS. I've even seen a few on the bus (a 45 min. trip for me, and they > were already on) who have one bottle in with the baby, and 2 or 3 more > underneath, just sitting there, curdling. BLECH! Ah, that reminds me. It's regularly over 100F here, and was a cool 95F on Saturday, so we took a walk. A looong walk. Had to return the hospital pump and decided to do some other stuff hanging around downtown, it was about 5 hrs in the end, though we took some breaks in cool places. DD did wonderfully. But I was thinking what a major PITA that would have been if I'd had to bottle feed! Instead I could just feed her whenever she got hungry, wherever we were. It reminded me of how much easier BF really is, and made the difficult bits so worth it!
Notchalk - 11 Aug 2006 15:19 GMT > I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > in until day 5 so the nurses said they had to supplement with formula > so baby won't starve. etc. A simillar topic has been discussed on a Midwifery list I subscribe to. I have permission to post this from the owner, but I thought it said it all...
I too wondered why breastfeeding seems so difficult and stressful for so many women....... especially once I'd worked with indigenous women and saw how easy they seemed to find it. So trying to figure it out, I noticed a few differences. Indigenous women have alot of exposure to breastfeeding as they have extended family groups with large families. They don't speak of 'trying' to breastfeed, it seems they don't even question their own ability that they will be able to do it. In my experience it is rare to see problems, and they are often associated with separation from their baby (ie prems/sick). Other things I noticed is that indigenous women never look at the clock, there is never the comment "I only fed 5 minutes ago... " they totally feed on demand and don't put feeds off until they've eaten lunch, or the visitors have gone or whatever. They aren't ashamed of their breasts or even self-conscious. For the midwife.........it's blissful! We encourage women to be instinctive with birthing their baby, maybe we should do the same with breastfeeding? (just thinking out loud)
/end quote.
Jo
 Signature Woman, Wife, Mother, Midwife
jeni_steers@yahoo.co.uk - 11 Aug 2006 15:59 GMT > > I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > > /end quote. In there is your problem. The Western world, for want of a better description, has come so far from 'nature' that the experience of indigenous women in *all* areas of life is not really comparable to ours. I agree 100% with the principle that we should get back to bf'ing being instinctive, but you cannot roll back centuries of 'progress' just by saying it should be so. Not that I am saying you are suggesting that, but there are some that see it that black and white that it becomes counterproductive. How to make that revision back to instinct gradually is also a point of contest and whilst the world is still going 'forward' it becomes harder. So far instant Utopia has failed, I believe we need to take it as slowly as it did to change in the first place.
Gosh, that's a bit heavy for a Friday afternoon! :)
Jeni
doulamom@optonline.net - 11 Aug 2006 20:25 GMT > I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Is that just me? Did you find the 'I will try and see" attitude worked > for you? Especially when it was difficult at first? As a mom and as an educator I have seen a definite correlation between the attitude 'I'll try' and quickly giving up on breastfeeding. Sure there are some mom's who have the 'I'll give it a try' attitude and end up with a successful breastfeeding relationship and some mom's who are determined to make it work no matter what who end up formula feeding.
On a personal note, when I was pregnant with dd#1 I planned on breastfeeding. I read nothing, prepared nothing just planned on nursing. I had been breastfed, all my neices and nephews were breastfed-it's how you fed a baby. I had an unplanned C-section ), they brought me dd when she was 4 hours old, I latched her on and that was that. I had some sore nipples but no other issues. Now I'm not saying that being ignorant of possible breastfeeding problems is the key to successful breastfeeding but I do wonder how much the fact that I was so totally relaxed and not anxious about nursing my dd impacted how well it went. I think a place somewhere in the middle is the best place to be. Educated but not anxious.
On my due date bulletin board (may 2006) there are approximately 20 regular posters. There are three of us still nursing. :-(
jenrose@jenrose.com - 24 Aug 2006 12:26 GMT > I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Is that just me? Did you find the 'I will try and see" attitude worked > for you? Especially when it was difficult at first? Oh, I totally had the, "It WILL work" thing going for both my kids. Had I wavered at all, neither would have been breastfed--it was too dang painful the first week the first time, and just flat out HARD the second time. But I was raised to know that babies have a right to be nursed, even when it's not fun, and stuck with it because it was the thing to do. It chaps my nipples to hear people going off on how extended nursing is for the mom's benefit--it frankly drives me up the wall almost as much as my toddler's teeth, but my toddler *needs* my milk to an extreme degree, and so I put up with biting, pinching and pulling happening at every damn feed because she needs it. Or rather, I deal with it, I dont' really put up with it, but it keeps happening anyway. If it were all about what makes me feel good, this child would not be allowed within 10 feet of my breasts. But it's worth it, because she's catching up on some of her milestones, her hearing is improving, she's doing *so* much better than anyone could have predicted, and I strongly suspect that breastfeeding has a lot to do with it. So we persist, pinchy grabby bity baby and all.
I enjoyed nursing my older daughter for about 2 years of our 6 year nursing relationship. I tolerated it gracefully for about 3 1/2 years of it. And I spent about 6 months at various times feeling like playing keepaway with the boobie.
With dd2, I enjoyed it for about 4 blissful weeks when she was not biting and I was not weighing her and she had no teeth and I didn't have to pump and she seemed to be nursing well most of the time without choking and gagging. She's 17 months old. I spent 4 1/2 months teaching her to nurse, 1 month enjoying it, 1 month panicking because she had learned to latch about as well as I thought we could get and still wasn't gaining, 2 months being vaguely depressed that she gained better on supplemental coconut milk than on breastmilk, and then the biting started. So doing the math, that's 1 month of "rather pleasant" and 16 months of, "Because she needs it"...and counting.
Nothing, NOTHING could have prepared me for this nursing relationship--but it's *still* better than formula, especially for this baby. I strongly suspect she'd have been hospitalized multiple times if she'd been formula-fed, due to aspiration.
KD - 24 Aug 2006 13:48 GMT > > I am curious to hear other's perspectives. On another parenting board, > > where most of the members are young and first time moms, I read so [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > baby. I strongly suspect she'd have been hospitalized multiple times if > she'd been formula-fed, due to aspiration. You nursed until your child was six? Wow.
For me, if I hadn't been really determined and had lots of support, I probably wouldn't have continued breastfeeding past the first week or two. It REALLY hurt, I have an inverted nipple that hurt even more than the 'good' one, and I was doing the emotional roller coaster thing for the first three weeks. But my husband was there to encourage me and help however he could (he was home with us for the first five weeks), I had access to lactation consultants at a mother/baby clinic at our maternity hospital, and public health nurses who could visit me at home.
I have an aversion to asking for help, but my husband pushed me to take advantage of the help that was available, and that really made a big difference.
Today, my boy is nearly five months old, about 22 pounds, and exclusively breastfed. And now it's easy and painless. I never have to worry if I brought enough food for him. There's no warming, no mixing, no sterilization required, it's always there, always ready, and it's FREE.
My only concern now is teeth. He's got three bottom ones, but I can see the top ones coming. I've heard that when the top ones come in it can get painful. Anybody have any insight here?
Thanks,
KD & G
mcmahan@cup.hp.com - 24 Aug 2006 15:21 GMT : My only concern now is teeth. He's got three bottom ones, but I can see : the top ones coming. I've heard that when the top ones come in it can : get painful. Anybody have any insight here? Latch! Latch! Latch! They really can't bite unless their latch slips down on to the end of the nipple. Be vigilant and don't allow a shallow latch.
Larry
Notchalk - 25 Aug 2006 01:25 GMT > : My only concern now is teeth. He's got three bottom ones, but I can see > : the top ones coming. I've heard that when the top ones come in it can [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Larry It's not just that, but those top teeth DO rub on the areola... I have a permenant mark on mine from this. I found changing the style of sippy cup he used for water helped though, I changed to a straw.
Jo
 Signature Woman, Wife, Mother, Midwife
|
|
|