New York – June 21 -- Water suppliers nationwide, in the US, are
required to supply consumers with annual Water Quality Reports or
Consumer Confidence Reports at least once a year at around this
time.
“Consumers should take this yearly opportunity to check their water
fluoride levels,” says attorney Paul Beeber, President, New York State
Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc. "If your water department adds
fluoride chemicals, tell them and your legislators to stop. They are
wasting your money and endangering your health," says Beeber.
“If your water is not fluoridated, don’t be complacent. The American
Dental Association has mobilized their army of dentists nationwide to
go to your legislators and convince them that you need to swallow more
fluoride (a) without any knowledge of how much fluoride you are
already ingesting,” says Beeber
Dental fluorosis (discolored teeth), the visible sign of fluoride
overdose, now afflicts up 48% of school children, reports the Centers
for Disease Control (CDC).
Fluoride's purported benefits are topical but its risks are systemic,
says the CDC. "This means there is no good reason to swallow fluoride
and no logical justification for water fluoridation," says Beeber.
A 2006 review of peer-reviewed studies in respected journals by the
prestigious National Research Council (NRC) reveals fluoride is a
health risk even at low levels added to water supplies. Especially
harmed are high-water drinkers, babies, kidney and thyroid patients.
The NRC panel found that fluoride’s links to cancer and lowered IQ are
plausible.
Because of the NRC report, the CDC and the American Dental Association
both advise that infant formula should NOT be mixed with fluoridated
water.
The NRC report also caused the National Kidney Foundation to advise
that “Individuals with CKD [Chronic Kidney Disease] should be
notified of the potential risk of fluoride exposure.” Too much
fluoride damages bones and malfunctioning kidneys do not excrete
fluoride properly allowing a toxic build-up in the bones.
Besides, fluoride ingestion is not stopping tooth decay in primary
teeth.
According to a systematic review of fluoride supplement research
published in the November 2008 Journal of the American Dental
Association, "There is weak and inconsistent evidence that the use of
fluoride supplements prevents dental caries in primary teeth." In
fact, the authors could find only one study, from China, showing any
fluoride benefit to primary teeth and that study was probably biased
with a high withdrawal rate, the authors write.
Fluoride supplements never underwent FDA testing.(1)
"Fluoridation began with the untested belief that ingested fluoride
prevented tooth decay in small children, only. Evidence-based-
dentistry now shows that swallowing fluoride poses dental risks
without benefits to the very children fluoridation was supposed to
help," says Beeber.
"It may...be that fluoridation of drinking water does not have a
strong protective effect against early childhood caries (cavities)
reports
dentist Howard Pollick, University of California, and colleagues, in
the Winter 2003 Journal of Public Health Dentistry.
Beeber advises: Call your water department, ask if fluoride chemicals
are added into your water supply. Then ask them and your local
legislators, “Who has the authority to stop fluoridation?” Organize
your neighbors to lobby the appropriate agency or department to have
them cease fluoridation. You will be saving your community money and
improving overall health with no increased dental risk. In fact, many
studies show that when fluoridation ends, tooth decay rates actually
go down or stay the same.
Fluoride does occur naturally in most water systems. But over 90% of
fluoridating communities use silicofluorides, waste products of
phosphate fertilizer production, which carry trace amounts of lead,
arsenic, mercury and other toxins, according to NSF International, the
governing body over water additives.(2)
Opposition to fluoridation is scientific, respectable and growing in
numbers and political popularity.
On November 4, 2008, 53 US cities rejected fluoridation joining a
growing list of communities saying "No" to fluoridation.
Dr. Joey Hensley, a respected practicing physician serving in the
Tennessee legislature, urges all Tennessee Water Districts to stop
fluoridation. At least 31 Tennessee water districts have already
complied.
Over 2,500 professionals signed a statement urging the US Congress to
stop water fluoridation until Congressional hearings are conducted,
citing scientific evidence that fluoridation, long promoted to fight
tooth decay, is ineffective and has serious health risks. See
statement: http://www.fluorideaction.org/statement.august.2007.html
Also, 11 Environmental Protection Agency unions, representing over
7000 environmental and public health professionals, called for a
moratorium on drinking water fluoridation programs across the country,
and have asked EPA management to recognize fluoride as posing a
serious risk of causing cancer in people. (3)
Fluoridation is now a political issue usually defended and promoted,
without valid science, by organized dentistry and their members in
federal and state health departments as well as those in private
practice.
For more information on fluoride's adverse health effects, visit the
Fluoride Action Network Health Page at http://www.FluorideAction.Net/health
Join the 21,000 Americans calling on Congress to stop fluoridation
here: http://congress.FluorideAction.Net
SOURCE: New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc.
http://www.orgsites.com/ny/nyscof
http://www.FluorideAction.Net
References:
a) http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/pubs/adanews/adanewsarticle.asp?articleid=3589
1) August 2000 letter from NJ Assemblyman Kelly to Senator Robert
Smith http://www.fluoridealert.org/fda.htm
2) www.nsf.org/business/water_distribution/pdf/NSF_Fact_Sheet.pdf
3) Press Release August 19, 2005, “EPA Unions Call for Nationwide
Moratorium on Fluoridation, Congressional Hearing on Adverse Effects,
Youth Cancer Cover Up,” Contact: Dr. William Hirzy, Vice-President
NTEU Chapter 280
http://www2.fluoridealert.org/Alert/United-States/National/EPA-unions-call-for-m
oratorium-on-fluoride-in-drinking-water
Ray K - 21 Jun 2009 16:15 GMT
There's lots more on the politics and danger of fluoride here:
http://garynull.com/GNarticles.php
Scroll down to Dentistry and start reading.
> New York – June 21 -- Water suppliers nationwide, in the US, are
> required to supply consumers with annual Water Quality Reports or
[quoted text clipped - 130 lines]
>
> http://www2.fluoridealert.org/Alert/United-States/National/EPA-unions-call-for-m
oratorium-on-fluoride-in-drinking-water
Ray K - 21 Jun 2009 17:48 GMT
> “If your water is not fluoridated, don’t be complacent. The American
> Dental Association has mobilized their army of dentists nationwide to
> go to your legislators and convince them that you need to swallow more
> fluoride (a) without any knowledge of how much fluoride you are
> already ingesting,” says Beeber
Since the alleged benefit of fluoride is to reduce cavities, then why in
the world would dentists support any measure that would reduce their
future income?
There must be some dark side of fluoride that will eventually offset the
loss of income from not performing fillings with increased income from
some other very expensive future treatments. After all, the ADA (just
like the AMA) is a dentists' union whose main function is the welfare of
its members. It is not a benevolent public interest group.
To replace a molar that already had a root canal, I first spent about
$900 on an apicodectomy to try to save the tooth. When that didn't work,
it was about $1500 for removal and an implant. I face $1800 more for the
post and crown. All for a single tooth.
I not claiming that any of this was related to fluoride, since I'm 70
and its use wasn't widespread when I was a child. It' just an example of
the type of future expense that could happen.
nyscof - 22 Jun 2009 12:08 GMT
Actually, fluoridation is not reducing tooth decay. See:
http://www.FluorideNews.blogspot.com
While there are many varied reasons for the inception of fluoridation,
what' causing organized dentistry to go full throttle on promoting
fluoridation is that it gives the illusion they care about low-income
Americans.
80% of dentists refuse Medicaid patients and 130 million Americans
don't have dental insurance.
Whenever organized dentistry's lucrative monopoly is threatened, they
use their political might and deep pockets filled with corporate cash
to fight back. For instance, the American Dental Association
unsuccessfully sued to stop Dental Health Aide Therapists from working
in rural Alaska where people used to pull their own teeth despite that
no dentists will work or live there
A more blatant example of protecting their bottom line occurred in
Louisiana where the Louisiana Dental Association introduced a bill to
outlaw a particular dentist from traveling to schools in poor
neighborhoods and fix teeth then bill Medicaid. These are children
that would otherwise go untreated. The LDA actually sent around
petitions about how this would infringe on their businesses - even
though they don't accept Medicaid patients.
What needs to be done is for legislators to mandate that dentists
treat more low-income children or allow other viable groups to do so -
but organized dentistry is too politically powerful and rich to allow
that to happen.
If fluoridation hurt dentists' bottom line, they would be screaming to
have it stopped.
The Wall street Journal reported several years ago that many dentists
make three times as much as physicians while working fewer days and
fewer hours doing less critical work.
Instead of spreading cavity-free teeth across the land, fluoridation
has spread dental fluorosis (discolored teeth) across the land.
Dentists will happily cover up those white-spotted, yellow or brown
teeth with bonding, veneers, caps, or micro-abrasion - all services
not usually covered by insurance.
So, while I don't believe that was their intention, fluoridation has
created a lucrative new market for cosmetic dentistry. So why would
dentists oppose it?
> > “If your water is not fluoridated, don’t be complacent. The American
> > Dental Association has mobilized their army of dentists nationwide to
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> and its use wasn't widespread when I was a child. It' just an example of
> the type of future expense that could happen.
Ray K - 23 Jun 2009 13:46 GMT
Thanks, nyscof, for the exposing other considerations concerning
flouridation.
Shadow - 20 Aug 2009 21:55 GMT
>>Fluoride in your water?
Yes.
>> GET IT OUT
It's out.
What do I do now ? Piss on the water ?
[]'s
PS - fluoride is good, in low doses.