Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Parenting / July 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Man attempts suicide in court over unpaid CS

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Don - 15 Jul 2004 15:52 GMT
Man attempts suicide in court
http://www.newsandsentinel.com/news/story/0714202004_new04suicide.asp

Court officials, claimed he consumed a mixture of Pepsi Cola and antifreeze
from a 20-ounce bottle during hearing on unpaid child support in Judge Ed
Lane's Washington County Common Pleas courtroom.
Tiffany - 15 Jul 2004 17:56 GMT
> Man attempts suicide in court
> http://www.newsandsentinel.com/news/story/0714202004_new04suicide.asp
>
> Court officials, claimed he consumed a mixture of Pepsi Cola and antifreeze
> from a 20-ounce bottle during hearing on unpaid child support in Judge Ed
> Lane's Washington County Common Pleas courtroom.

Interesting that this man would do this while the court house is in stages
of moving.

There is also no mention of the extent of this man's CS issues so I don't
think one can ASSUME that he did this because of the CS system.

T
Don - 15 Jul 2004 19:36 GMT
> > Man attempts suicide in court
> > http://www.newsandsentinel.com/news/story/0714202004_new04suicide.asp
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Interesting that this man would do this while the court house is in stages
> of moving.

and that is interesting because?

> There is also no mention of the extent of this man's CS issues so I don't
> think one can ASSUME that he did this because of the CS system.

Like that is not enough.  Right now the government falls all over itself to
do what it can for you but you are still unsatisfied.   I therefore can only
imagine how you would handle walking a mile in this mans shoes with the
constant threat of jail time without having committed a crime.
Tiffany - 15 Jul 2004 19:49 GMT
> > "Don" <don@free> wrote in message
> news:10fd6gfkmnmb9c9@corp.supernews.com...
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> imagine how you would handle walking a mile in this mans shoes with the
> constant threat of jail time without having committed a crime.

Interesting because he knew the response time would be slow and he could
blame it on them possibly.

How do you get that I am unsatisfied out of those few sentences? And what
exactly am I unsatisfied about? lol

So if I were going to court and might go to jail because I don't pay my
speeding tickets, but I decide to try to kill myself, we could all just
blame the courts for threatening to put me in jail and that pushed me over
the edge? Maybe I could sue them for all the stress it put on my already
stressed life?

I can't walk in his shoes, but no where did I put the man down. I merely
stated that no where does it state in the article what sort of situation he
was in.

T
Don - 15 Jul 2004 20:18 GMT
> > > "Don" <don@free> wrote in message
> > news:10fd6gfkmnmb9c9@corp.supernews.com...
> > > > Man attempts suicide in court

http://www.newsandsentinel.com/news/story/0714202004_new04suicide.asp

> > > > Court officials, claimed he consumed a mixture of Pepsi Cola and
> > > antifreeze
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Interesting because he knew the response time would be slow and he could
> blame it on them possibly.

If he did wish to blame it on them what other reasons could he possibly have
other than the reason he was there for,  failure to pay child support.

There is a new jail house opening across town but up until this article came
out no one outside of the staff would know what the staffing level was
between the court house and the jail.  It is therefore likely he did not
have any idea he would be rescued in time during this suicide attempt.

> How do you get that I am unsatisfied out of those few sentences? And what
> exactly am I unsatisfied about? lol

I have read some of your other posts in this newsgroup with all your I want
my CS money bellyaching.

> So if I were going to court and might go to jail because I don't pay my
> speeding tickets, but I decide to try to kill myself, we could all just
> blame the courts for threatening to put me in jail and that pushed me over
> the edge? Maybe I could sue them for all the stress it put on my already
> stressed life?

It is pretty sick to compare a speeding ticket to a father who loses equal
access to his children,  children who lose an equal parent in their life,
the father is forced to pay lifestyle child support and then is threatened
with imprisionment.

Tell me do you lol and make these same comparisions when blacks, women and
jews were denied their rights?
Have you ever been late on a bill and do you feel it is justified that you
should spend time in jail for being late on a phone bill?  A debt that
should not have been mandated by the government in the first place.  If
fathers had equal rights to their children a child support debt would not be
placed on fathers in first place.

> I can't walk in his shoes, but no where did I put the man down. I merely
> stated that no where does it state in the article what sort of situation he
> was in.

It clearly tells the situation.  He was in court for failure to pay child
support.
Tiffany - 15 Jul 2004 20:38 GMT
snipped

> There is a new jail house opening across town but up until this article came
> out no one outside of the staff would know what the staffing level was
> between the court house and the jail.  It is therefore likely he did not
> have any idea he would be rescued in time during this suicide attempt.

So you live there? Doesnt' matter, this really isn't the issue at hand.

> > How do you get that I am unsatisfied out of those few sentences? And what
> > exactly am I unsatisfied about? lol
>
> I have read some of your other posts in this newsgroup with all your I want
> my CS money bellyaching.

Really Don? Copy one and let me read it. You might be mistaking me for
someone else because my daughter's father and I had an agreement which he
didn't uphold but I didn't push it. If you call stating my situation
bellyaching, you are wrong. I also don't have a CS case to deal with
anymore. He died.

> > So if I were going to court and might go to jail because I don't pay my
> > speeding tickets, but I decide to try to kill myself, we could all just
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> the father is forced to pay lifestyle child support and then is threatened
> with imprisionment.

First off, you ASSUME the man in the article was in that sort of situation.
AGAIN, you don't know his situation. Not all fathers lose access to the
kids, not all fathers WANT access, people are not all the same.

Second, it is sick to blame others for your personal actions. Though outside
actions can push onse over the edge, it is one's desicion to die or not.

> Tell me do you lol and make these same comparisions when blacks, women and
> jews were denied their rights?

They can not legally be denied anything now a days but as a women, I can
imagine what it was like many years ago. But that was then, this is now. I
don't hang on to the past.

> Have you ever been late on a bill and do you feel it is justified that you
> should spend time in jail for being late on a phone bill?  A debt that
> should not have been mandated by the government in the first place.  If
> fathers had equal rights to their children a child support debt would not be
> placed on fathers in first place.

I imagine if they told me I could go to jail if I didn't pay my phone bill,
then I would pay the damn phone bill Don. But I don't support a system that
puts a man in jail for CS issues. You don't even know what I feel of the CS
system, I suppose you have assumed something of me.

> > I can't walk in his shoes, but no where did I put the man down. I merely
> > stated that no where does it state in the article what sort of situation
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> It clearly tells the situation.  He was in court for failure to pay child
> support.

Maybe he had fair amounts set and still didn't want to pay. Maybe he had
lots of money but still didn't want to help his kids. Maybe he was the
a.shole who left the kids without a father. Maybe he is the greatest man on
Earth and being screwed like many others. Maybe he has some mental issues
even before his dealings with CS came up. Just can't tell can you?

T
Don - 15 Jul 2004 21:47 GMT
> snipped
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> bellyaching, you are wrong. I also don't have a CS case to deal with
> anymore. He died.

I think I know who I am getting you mixed up with in respect to receiving CS
and complaining here about.  But that does not change my replies since the
point was I find you comparing being a single mom to the same hardship of
being threatened by the government putting you in jail an pretty extreme
view.

I also see a pattern of posts in defense of various aspects of the vicious
system and your failure to recognize how it places individuals in such
extreme circumstances they mentally breakdown and commit extreme actions
such as suicide.  (I am not saying what he did was right in any way shape or
form)

> > > So if I were going to court and might go to jail because I don't pay my
> > > speeding tickets, but I decide to try to kill myself, we could all just
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> AGAIN, you don't know his situation. Not all fathers lose access to the
> kids, not all fathers WANT access, people are not all the same.

The article was clear that he was in court for failure to pay child support.
The law is clear than men do not have equal rights to their children.

> Second, it is sick to blame others for your personal actions. Though outside
> actions can push onse over the edge, it is one's desicion to die or not.

The article does not say anything about him blaming others for his personal
actions.  The system itself is at fault irrelevant to his personal actions
since the system has no business dictating that fathers automatically do not
have equal rights to their children.

You place any person in such an extreme circumstance which is the current
outrageous lifestyle child support system it may or may not drive that
person to insanity.   This is a good example of a man driven to such
extreme-insanity he obviously felt his only way out was to take his own
life.

The only place I think we are in obviously in agreement is that suicide is
not the answer. But again people that are in such an extreme situation
typically are not thinking clearly.

> > Tell me do you lol and make these same comparisions when blacks, women and
> > jews were denied their rights?
>
> They can not legally be denied anything now a days but as a women, I can
> imagine what it was like many years ago. But that was then, this is now. I
> don't hang on to the past.

Fathers are under the same kind of discrimination and you seem to condone it
in some of your posts.

> > Have you ever been late on a bill and do you feel it is justified that you
> > should spend time in jail for being late on a phone bill?  A debt that
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I imagine if they told me I could go to jail if I didn't pay my phone bill,
> then I would pay the damn phone bill Don.

Lets say due to circumstances beyond your control you did not have the money
that month. Is it fair to you that you are placed in prison where far worse
happens to you.

> But I don't support a system that
> puts a man in jail for CS issues.

Thats a good thing, but you need to recognize that in a free society we
should not be under constant threat of it for being poor.

> You don't even know what I feel of the CS
> system, I suppose you have assumed something of me.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Maybe he had fair amounts set

No such thing unless he chose not be an equal father.  Unfortunately the
system automatically makes fathers unequal.

and still didn't want to pay. Maybe he had
> lots of money but still didn't want to help his kids. Maybe he was the
> a.shole who left the kids without a father. Maybe he is the greatest man on
> Earth and being screwed like many others. Maybe he has some mental issues
> even before his dealings with CS came up. Just can't tell can you?

This much is true.
Tiffany - 15 Jul 2004 23:07 GMT
> > "Don" <don@free> wrote in message
> news:10fdm4m12gcip81@corp.supernews.com...
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> such as suicide.  (I am not saying what he did was right in any way shape or
> form)

Yes, I reconize it happens in all aspects of life to many kinds of people.
I still think one must take blame for ones actions. What about the effect of
a suicide on the children left behind? It is not the childrens faults that
the fathers are taken out of their lives. Imagine what it would be like for
that child whose father killed himself??? I think of that and wonder how
anyone can do it.

>  >
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> extreme-insanity he obviously felt his only way out was to take his own
> life.

> The only place I think we are in obviously in agreement is that suicide is
> not the answer. But again people that are in such an extreme situation
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Fathers are under the same kind of discrimination and you seem to condone it
> in some of your posts.

The laws in family court need to change. I don't condone fathers being taken
out of their childrens lives. Where did I condone that?

> > > Have you ever been late on a bill and do you feel it is justified that
> you
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> that month. Is it fair to you that you are placed in prison where far worse
> happens to you.

I think most men that do get sent to jail for failure to pay aren't the ones
that miss a payment or two. Of course, since my time here, I have seen there
are extreme cases that are just totally wrong. But I don't agree with
putting fathers in jail so there is nothing to argue over.

> > But I don't support a system that
> > puts a man in jail for CS issues.
>
> Thats a good thing, but you need to recognize that in a free society we
> should not be under constant threat of it for being poor.

No, we should not be under so much goverment control. I wish you wouldn't
put words and idea's that I haven't said before.

> > You don't even know what I feel of the CS
> > system, I suppose you have assumed something of me.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> No such thing unless he chose not be an equal father.  Unfortunately the
> system automatically makes fathers unequal.

Yes, it can happen. Some couple's agree on an amount and are happy with it.
I know of many cases like that. Well, a few, most are outrageous amounts.
Bob - 15 Jul 2004 23:41 GMT
>>and complaining here about.  But that does not change my replies since the
>>point was I find you comparing being a single mom to the same hardship of
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> that child whose father killed himself??? I think of that and wonder how
> anyone can do it.

Indeed, most of the time it's not the father's fault either, but the
kids usually won't figure that out for another 20 years.

Murder by psychological torment is as bad as other kinds, and worse
perhaps in terms of suffering.

>>Fathers are under the same kind of discrimination and you seem to condone
>> it in some of your posts.
>
> The laws in family court need to change. I don't condone fathers being taken
> out of their childrens lives. Where did I condone that?

Seems to be the drift of many of your posts. Have you not supported
"custody" and "child support" laws?  For example see same post below.

>>that month. Is it fair to you that you are placed in prison where far
>> worse happens to you.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> are extreme cases that are just totally wrong. But I don't agree with
> putting fathers in jail so there is nothing to argue over.

Yet you support the underlying "custody" and "child support" programs
that the jail time is based on. How hypocritical of you.

>>Thats a good thing, but you need to recognize that in a free society we
>>should not be under constant threat of it for being poor.
>
> No, we should not be under so much goverment control. I wish you wouldn't
> put words and idea's that I haven't said before.

So do you support getting the government out of the whole business?

>>No such thing unless he chose not be an equal father.  Unfortunately the
>>system automatically makes fathers unequal.
>
> Yes, it can happen.

NO!  It is the law.  "Can happen" is disingenuous and wrong.

> Some couple's agree on an amount and are happy with it.
> I know of many cases like that. Well, a few, most are outrageous amounts.

You just claimed not to support government control and all the crap that
goes with it.  Yet here you are again.  How very hypocritical of you.

Bob

Signature

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women."  John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/

[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts.  All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

Tiffany - 16 Jul 2004 02:41 GMT
> >>and complaining here about.  But that does not change my replies since the
> >>point was I find you comparing being a single mom to the same hardship of
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> Yet you support the underlying "custody" and "child support" programs
> that the jail time is based on. How hypocritical of you.

Where do I say I SUPPORT anything toots? I state what I see around me, I
didn't say I support it. Stop putting words out there that aren't there. Its
getting old.

> >>Thats a good thing, but you need to recognize that in a free society we
> >>should not be under constant threat of it for being poor.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> So do you support getting the government out of the whole business?

I think adults should be mature enough to handle their own responsbilities.
That just isn't going to happen. Someone has to be able to mediate. If you
read what I wrote, (yes, I know that is hard) I siad the gov. should not
have as much control as they do. But the people have let it happen so it
will continue.

> >>No such thing unless he chose not be an equal father.  Unfortunately the
> >>system automatically makes fathers unequal.
> >
> > Yes, it can happen.
>
> NO!  It is the law.  "Can happen" is disingenuous and wrong.

If two adults are mature enough, it happens. They mediate the situation with
the kids in mind, not themselves.

> > Some couple's agree on an amount and are happy with it.
> > I know of many cases like that. Well, a few, most are outrageous amounts.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Bob

No, hyprocritical would be to be against the system but then utilize it. I
never spend a minute in family court, thank you very much. How much time did
you spend there as your wife took the kids from you? lol

T
Beverly - 16 Jul 2004 00:46 GMT
Snipped for brevity.

>Have you ever been late on a bill and do you feel it is justified that you
>should spend time in jail for being late on a phone bill?  A debt that
>should not have been mandated by the government in the first place.

The government doesn't have to pay the phone bill if I don't.
Granted, the government does not foot the bill of child raising with
self-sufficient parents, but single parents and married parents alike
are eligible for government aid should income be insufficient and are
also subject to standards of care set by child protection (meaning the
government can take the child away for insufficient care, but then
must provide it).  Therefore, the government has a stake in making
sure that parental support is the primary means of support for a
child.

>If fathers had equal rights to their children a child support debt would not be
>placed on fathers in first place.

And we would assume that, if this were the case, every father would
exercise his rights?  I'm sure many would as they would be pleased to
have equal time with the children and no child support to pay, but a
right and an obligation are two different things.  How would you
propose a parent who does not exercise his/her rights might live up to
his/her obligations?
Bob - 16 Jul 2004 02:32 GMT
> Snipped for brevity.
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> propose a parent who does not exercise his/her rights might live up to
> his/her obligations?

When the US Constitution was written, debtor's prisons were so abhorrent
that they included bankruptcy as a fundamental right.

Since the advent of the radical feminazi social experiment called "child
support" they have brought back debtor's prisons and indentured
servitude, a form of slavery.

It is truly amazing how otherwise decent people can support such
abhorrent and vile miscarriages of justice.

Bob

Signature

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women."  John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/

[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts.  All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

Bob Whiteside - 16 Jul 2004 04:10 GMT
> Snipped for brevity.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> sure that parental support is the primary means of support for a
> child.

If that is the case, why does the government only have a stake in making
sure parental support is the primary means of support for child of divorced
or separated parents?  And why does the government only assign a formal CS
obligation to one of the parents?  And why does the government only enforce
the duty of support against one parent?  And why doesn't the government
create and track a similar CS obligation for the other parent?  And why does
the government assume a parent on welfare cannot support their children but
the other parent can?  And why does the government require CS add-on
payments for healthcare, daycare, and education expenses that benefit the
other parent over and above basic CS awards because they duplicate CS
setting model base data?  And why does the government impute incomes to
force even higher payments?  And why does the government set CS awards far
above the level required to provide sufficient care just because a parent
makes more money?  And why does the government treat the CS "guidelines" as
de facto law refusing to accept rebuttals to an amount that has nothing to
do with the circumstances of the parents?
Gini - 15 Jul 2004 20:33 GMT
>> "Don" <don@free> wrote in message
>news:10fd6gfkmnmb9c9@corp.supernews.com...
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>Like that is not enough.  Right now the government falls all over itself to
>do what it can for you but you are still unsatisfied.  
=====
Don, What the heck are you talking about? You usually make sense but your
comments to Tiffany are in left field. She's been around here for quite a while
and has never been "extreme" in any of her views. She has supported most of the
dads here and has always been polite in her areas of disagreement(well, there
was that one person who really pissed her off). Tiffany is a single parent of a
child whose bio father has died. She has worked and raised her child alone
(w/out cs support even when the dad was alive).
=====
=====
Don - 15 Jul 2004 21:11 GMT
> >> "Don" <don@free> wrote in message
> >news:10fd6gfkmnmb9c9@corp.supernews.com...
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> =====
> =====

I find comparing being a single mom to the same hardship of being threatened
by the government putting you in jail an pretty extreme view.

The only error I see that you point out is that she is actually not
receiving CS which really does not change the reply.  Since the point was
lets see her walk a mile in mans shoes with this constant threat of
imprisionment for being poor and having not committed any crime.
Bob Whiteside - 15 Jul 2004 22:08 GMT
> > >> "Don" <don@free> wrote in message
> > >news:10fd6gfkmnmb9c9@corp.supernews.com...
> > >> > Man attempts suicide in court

http://www.newsandsentinel.com/news/story/0714202004_new04suicide.asp

> > >> > Court officials, claimed he consumed a mixture of Pepsi Cola and
> > >> antifreeze
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> lets see her walk a mile in mans shoes with this constant threat of
> imprisionment for being poor and having not committed any crime.

My concerns were directed at how the article was written.  The premise for
the article was to talk about the attempted suicide in the courthouse.  Yet
90% of the story was devoted to how the courthouse procedures need to change
between the bailiffs, sheriff, and EMT's if another emergency occurs.

No comment was made in the article about the accusations against the man
being an "alleged" crime, what may have pushed him over the edge, or how the
CS system is very stressful.  The county was more concerned about their
freaking emergency procedures, rather than what caused the problem.

The man in this story was treated like a disposable dad. My anger is at the
system and the media for not recognizing they might be contributing to some
of the problems in society instead of fixing them.  It's typical that when
government sees a problem they add more and more to their procedures without
looking at the root causes of problems and fixing the underlying issues.
Don - 15 Jul 2004 22:52 GMT
> > > >> "Don" <don@free> wrote in message
> > > >news:10fd6gfkmnmb9c9@corp.supernews.com...
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
> government sees a problem they add more and more to their procedures without
> looking at the root causes of problems and fixing the underlying issues.

Unfortunately when you do come across an article where the writer does
recognizes there might be a contributing problem it typically comes down to
figuring out ways to crack down further on those dastardly dead beat dads.
Tiffany - 15 Jul 2004 22:57 GMT
> > > >> "Don" <don@free> wrote in message
> > > >news:10fd6gfkmnmb9c9@corp.supernews.com...
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
> 90% of the story was devoted to how the courthouse procedures need to change
> between the bailiffs, sheriff, and EMT's if another emergency occurs.

You are very right about the article. The man was just an afterthought in
the article. Has there been any other articles on that situation I wonder???

T
Gini - 15 Jul 2004 23:44 GMT
................................

>My concerns were directed at how the article was written.  The premise for
>the article was to talk about the attempted suicide in the courthouse.  Yet
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>government sees a problem they add more and more to their procedures without
>looking at the root causes of problems and fixing the underlying issues.
=====
It is also an unfortunate reality that frequently, dads are perceived as bad
people and usually deserve whatever befalls them. This is the attitude of the
writers for the Women's Center I have recently dealt with. They seem to feel
that it's open season on dads and that it's about time. I'm sure the Women's
Center folks felt morally justified in their writings and were shocked to have
someone call them on it. I think "calling them on it" is one of the very basics
of bringing about public recognition of the injustices--not because it will
change the courts but because it will gradually change public sentiments, which
will, in turn wake up the elected court.
=====
=====
Bob - 15 Jul 2004 21:08 GMT
>>"Don" <don@free> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>>from a 20-ounce bottle during hearing on unpaid child support in Judge
>>> Ed Lane's Washington County Common Pleas courtroom.

Murder by emotional torment is becoming a leading cause of death for men
in mid life.  Thousands of men are murdered by being emotionally
tormented to suicide every year.  Judge Ed Lane and the ex are
responsible.

It is time for men to learn to fight back instead of quietly dying.

Bob

Signature

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women."  John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/

[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts.  All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

P.Fritz - 15 Jul 2004 21:31 GMT
Of course booby has no proof for his delusional claims.

> >>"Don" <don@free> wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Bob
Don - 15 Jul 2004 21:52 GMT
> Of course booby has no proof for his delusional claims.

Are we to believe this man took his own life not because he was there for
'failure to pay child support' but because of some other reason, like it was
a rainy day?

I am not condoning his actions but recognize how even the most sane among us
may crack when placed in such extreme circumstance.  Personally, if I was in
the same situation and had the money I would pay it.  If I could not make
ends meet if it was such an outrageous amount then I would likely say screw
this and just take off.

> > >>"Don" <don@free> wrote in message
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> >
> > Bob
P.Fritz - 15 Jul 2004 22:00 GMT
> > Of course booby has no proof for his delusional claims.
>
> Are we to believe this man took his own life not because he was there for
> 'failure to pay child support' but because of some other reason, like it was
> a rainy day?

I was talking about the NG moron's claims of  'thousands being murdered.'

> I am not condoning his actions but recognize how even the most sane among us
> may crack when placed in such extreme circumstance.  Personally, if I was in
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> > >
> > > Bob
Tiffany - 15 Jul 2004 22:57 GMT
> >>"Don" <don@free> wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Bob

I think most agree on that Bob, it seems the issue is HOW to fight back.

T
Bob - 15 Jul 2004 23:46 GMT
>>>>"Don" <don@free> wrote in message
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> T

We do disagree on that one.  Bob doesn't think that bending over to kiss
your a.s goodbye is much of a fight.

Bob

Signature

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women."  John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/

[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts.  All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

Gini - 16 Jul 2004 00:22 GMT
>> "Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
...........................

>>>It is time for men to learn to fight back instead of quietly dying.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Bob
=====
So what specifically have you done, Bob-Bob, to fight back? How many judges or
CSE whores have you shot? How many wives have you dumped in the bay? How many
children have you rescued at gunpoint?
=====
=====
Tiffany - 16 Jul 2004 02:32 GMT
> >>>>"Don" <don@free> wrote in message
> >>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Bob

I wouldn't want you anywhere near my a.s Bob. To me you are not a decent
man. lol

T
Bob - 16 Jul 2004 02:49 GMT
>>>>>>"Don" <don@free> wrote in message
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> T

Well, Tiff, from an evil man hating bigot, I call that a compliment.

Bob

Signature

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women."  John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/

Tiffany - 16 Jul 2004 02:54 GMT
> >>>>>>"Don" <don@free> wrote in message
> >>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> Bob

Toots, you are a hoot. Retirement must be good for you, you have such a
sunny deposition.

T
Bob - 16 Jul 2004 03:02 GMT
>>>I wouldn't want you anywhere near my a.s Bob. To me you are not a decent
>>>man. lol
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> T

toots   n. Slang  Babe; sweetie.

You can't figure out the gender of words either.  Pathetic.

Bob

Signature

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women."  John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/

[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts.  All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

Tiffany - 16 Jul 2004 03:31 GMT
> >>>I wouldn't want you anywhere near my a.s Bob. To me you are not a decent
> >>>man. lol
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Bob

I figure you have been someone's bitch, right? lol

T
P.Fritz - 16 Jul 2004 15:19 GMT
> > >>>I wouldn't want you anywhere near my a.s Bob. To me you are not a
> decent
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> I figure you have been someone's bitch, right? lol

Damn it Tiff........now I have to clena the Coke off the computer
screen..............LMAO

> T
Beverly - 16 Jul 2004 00:57 GMT
>> "Don" <don@free> wrote in message
>news:10fd6gfkmnmb9c9@corp.supernews.com...
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>imagine how you would handle walking a mile in this mans shoes with the
>constant threat of jail time without having committed a crime.

People are arrested for child neglect all the time, though.  If the
child lived with him and he failed to provide causing child protective
services to be called in to find children who hadn't eaten in days,
would he not be arrested for neglect?  I often wonder how my ex
believes we buy the basic necessities of life for the children because
he certainly doesn't worry about it.
DLove - 16 Jul 2004 02:15 GMT
I had a friend, yes, that&#8217;s right &#8220;had a friend&#8221; that got
a woman he was dating pregnant. One of those accidents he swears the
condom broke&#8230;however it happened is not what this is about anyway.
He was recently divorced and paying child support for 2 children he had
through marriage and so he begged this woman for an abortion or to give
the child up for adoption. The women refused and once the child was born
contacted the VA child support authorities to begin proceedings against
him for child support. A year later a judged finally ruled in her favor
awarding $890 + arrears for 1 and additional $200 per month making his
payments about $1100 per month for 1 child. He was still paying the
support of $400 his 2 children that resided in another state. He paid a
lawyer $2500 to help get his order adjusted because the judge would not
consider his other child support payments because they were not ordered by
court but paid voluntary in another state. The judge still refused to
reduce the amount. He never saw the woman or the child again. He moved
from a studio apt to a group home with 6 other people to reduce his living
cost, while she, a working woman making $40,000, living in a nice 2
bedroom apt was able to buy a new car. This was his life for 5 years and I
could see but not help his eventual slide into a deep depression because
he had no life, no car, and shared a toilet with 6 other people. 2 years
ago he lost his job and contacted the DCSE to have his payments reduce and
they refused him saying he was to get another job immediately and then if
the job paid less he could make another request for a reduction. He was
unable to get another job so DCSE took 55% of his unemployment check which
mad in unable to pay his rent so he had to move. He became homeless and I
think it was his embarrassment at his personal situation that made him
seem so elusive when I tried finding him to help. I was able to get him to
file for a reduction with the court but DCSE was unable to reach the
mother because the address they had on record belong to a friend who
forwarded  her checks to her but refused to give her current address.  The
judge refused a temporary reduction order saying that the mother had to be
present. So the case kept getting postponed until they finally located her
in another country and so finally almost a year later a court date was
finally set. When he appeared in court the first thing that happened was
the DA served him with a contempt order for him not paying for the past
year. He stated his case and inability to secure a job in his field
because of the economy and the judge asked him for proof that he looked
for work . He claimed to have kept some records but since did not have
them with him at the time court was rescheduled for 30 days later. Before
leaving the judge warned him that if he did not have a job at that time it
would not fair well with the court. He appeared back in court 30 days
later after getting a job a 7-11 one week earlier. He explained that he
had a job but DCSE had informed him that by law they could take up to 2/3
of his net pay which would leave him unable to take care of his own food
and housing and wouldn&#8217;t it be in the &#8220;best interest of the
child&#8221; to reduce his payments some he could at least keep a roof
over his head and be able to eat.  He showed the judge his record of 45
employers that he had filed applications with. After describing his
homeless situation to the judge She (the judge) then asked the mother if
she would agree to a reduction and she said no. The judge then asked the
DSCE attorney would they accept a reduction and they said they believed he
could find a better paying job and if the court reduced his payment they
believed he would just go out and get a high paying job depriving the
child of money it was entitled to. So the judge ruled&#8230;..against him
and kept his payment as is. He asked the judge if he could appeal the
decision and the judge said yes but in order to appeal he must post a bond
for the entire amount he was delinquent and it had to be done with in 30
days. The DA reminded him his contempt of court (failure to pay) hearing
was in 4 days and if he did not pay anything before then he had better
plan on going to jail.

For the next day and a half I tried to do my best to comfort my friend. He
came to stay with me and my girlfriend (1 bedroom apt) and he talked abut
nothing  but suicide. I called hotline, friends, pastors anybody I could
think of  to help me help him. He was a veteran and I finally talked to a
person at the VA and they had me bring him to the hospital where he
voluntary committed himself for 24 hours.  A day later I tried finding him
in the hospital only to find that he had signed himself out. His court
date was the following day so I call everyone I could think of to help me
locate him. I never found him. A week later I was contacted by the DC
police to come and make an ID of a John Doe that fit the description I had
given them. This was my first time doing anything like that so I showed up
at the morgue and was devastated to find my friend, dead. I hope non of
you will ever have to go through that kind of hell. He drank antifreeze to
end his pain. You can&#8217;t imagine the anger, the guilt, and the pain I
have to live with, thinking I could have done more for someone that I
called my friend. This child support monster the government has created
can only keep functioning if more and more (mostly men) are brought into
the system to satisfy the over 10 billons dollar a year that is
distributed to the states every year. Not today, because it&#8217;s too
late for my friend but eventually when enough (most men) get caught up in
this system then there will be a enough voices to make this tragedy stop.
He&#8217;s gone, took his own life, because he didn&#8217;t have enough
MONEY to give the system and live &#8230;not a luxurious life but just a
plain, basic, simple existence.  I have talked to many people who say this
shouldn&#8217;t have  happened or it&#8217;s and isolated case or what
about the mother and her struggle to raise a child. People say the system
is supposed to reduce your payments if you lose your job but the reality
is for most men is that less that 2% are able to get a reduction when they
are eligible. It&#8217;s like the fox guarding the chicken coop and always
difficult to prove that a system which has no checks or balances is
abiding by the law especially when there is profit being made. Well now my
friend is gone and I promised myself  to speak up and often, write letters
and stay informed and do my fair share to stop the He never saw the woman
again.  vilification of men by the family court system.
Bob - 16 Jul 2004 02:41 GMT
> I had a friend, yes, that&#8217;s right &#8220;had a friend&#8221; that got
> a woman he was dating pregnant. One of those accidents he swears the
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
> was in 4 days and if he did not pay anything before then he had better
> plan on going to jail.

He had 4 days to kill the judge and the bitch.  A strong man would have
gotten going. He's toast anyway, he needs to raise the kill ratio to at
least even.

> For the next day and a half I tried to do my best to comfort my friend. He
> came to stay with me and my girlfriend (1 bedroom apt) and he talked abut
> nothing  but suicide.

Time to re-focus.  Time to waste the evil judge and a couple of
attorneys, perhaps the bitch and her kid too. A late abortion when he
was deprived of equal rights to decide initially is better late than
never.

> I called hotline, friends, pastors anybody I could
> think of  to help me help him. He was a veteran and I finally talked to a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> police to come and make an ID of a John Doe that fit the description I had
> given them.

It's a shame that he was murdered by the bitch, lawyers, and judges.
The death is on their hands.  They have no right to live among decent
people.

> This was my first time doing anything like that so I showed up
> at the morgue and was devastated to find my friend, dead. I hope non of
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> and stay informed and do my fair share to stop the He never saw the woman
> again.  vilification of men by the family court system.

Do unto others as they will do unto you, only do it first.

Begging for forgiveness does not work, as your poor friend found out.
The time is long overdue for MEN to fight back agaisnt the VERY violent
and bloody murderous feminazi onslaught.

Bob

Signature

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women."  John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/

[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts.  All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

Gini - 16 Jul 2004 03:44 GMT
......................

>Time to re-focus.  Time to waste the evil judge and a couple of
>attorneys, perhaps the bitch and her kid too. A late abortion when he
>was deprived of equal rights to decide initially is better late than
>never.
=====
So what specifically have you done, Bob-Bob, to fight back? How many judges or
CSE whores have you shot? How many wives have you dumped in the bay? How many
children have you rescued at gunpoint?
=====
=====
Bob - 16 Jul 2004 15:12 GMT
> ......................
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> =====
> =====

Now you know that information like that can't be reported publicly.

The unfortunate man in this report was being killed by psychological
torment, and instead of fighting back he died quietly.  It was a total
waste.  He lost.  The evil bitch and her black robbed executioner won.

Bob

Signature

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women."  John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/

[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts.  All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

Beverly - 17 Jul 2004 00:02 GMT
>The unfortunate man in this report was being killed by psychological
>torment, and instead of fighting back he died quietly.

If [a woman] cannot be ABUSED by psychological torment, how can [a
man] be KILLED by it?
The Dave© - 17 Jul 2004 00:18 GMT
> Beverly wrote:
> If [a woman] cannot be ABUSED by psychological torment, how can [a
> man] be KILLED by it?

Because women are the carriers.

Why do men die before their wives?  Because they *WANT* to.

Yes, I'm joking.

Signature

How come nobody uses words like "nifty", "spiffy", and "keen" anymore?

P.Fritz - 16 Jul 2004 15:18 GMT
> ......................
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> CSE whores have you shot? How many wives have you dumped in the bay? How many
> children have you rescued at gunpoint?

Probably hundreds in his delusional mind.......poor Booby

> =====
> =====
Bob Whiteside - 16 Jul 2004 04:17 GMT
> >> "Don" <don@free> wrote in message
> >news:10fd6gfkmnmb9c9@corp.supernews.com...
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> believes we buy the basic necessities of life for the children because
> he certainly doesn't worry about it.

I can tell you that CPS is adamant they are not an enforcement agency.  The
only way they get involved is if they are called in by another state agency
or law enforcement group.  The exact words I heard from a CPS worker were:
"If you thought you children might die in a fire, we would not get involved
until after the fire."
Bob - 16 Jul 2004 15:14 GMT
>>>>"Don" <don@free> wrote in message
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> "If you thought you children might die in a fire, we would not get involved
> until after the fire."

And pigs fly too.  Sure, we believe ever word those evil liars tell.

How many kids have they "lost" in your state?

How many families have been hurt?

Bob

Signature

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women."  John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/

[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts.  All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.