Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Parenting / July 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

utah's practice

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
dconnor7@gmail.com - 15 Jul 2007 06:00 GMT
Im not anti government so I hope none of you think this is slander
towards them. I enrolled in Office of recovery services to ensure I
would recieve my support. Because of my childs father moving so offten
ORS said they couldnt locate him to take any thing. I had no clue
where he was or what he was doing so of course I believed ORS. After
three years of recieving little to nothing I decided to take a 350
mile trip to figure out what was going on. Surprisingly he called me
at my hotel room and after I asked him why I was getting so little he
brought me several check stubbs showing he had been paying. It was a
bit of a run around but I ended up getting a couple thousand dollars
in back pay. Im posting this because I hope this doesnt happen but it
could happen to any one.
DB - 17 Jul 2007 22:21 GMT
<dconnor7@gmail.com> wrote in
> Im not anti government so I hope none of you think this is slander
> towards them. I enrolled in Office of recovery services to ensure I
> would recieve my support.

The notion that we have to totally rely on the government for all our needs
is obscene in a free society.

Why do you need money from a man to raise your child?
Gini - 18 Jul 2007 01:21 GMT
> <dconnor7@gmail.com> wrote in
>> Im not anti government so I hope none of you think this is slander
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Why do you need money from a man to raise your child?
==
She referred to it as "my support" so apparently she's referring to alimony
;-)
DB - 18 Jul 2007 17:54 GMT
"Gini" <gini@verizon.com> wrote in
> ==
> She referred to it as "my support" so apparently she's referring to
> alimony ;-)

Yes, a hand out!
Soprano - 26 Jul 2007 07:01 GMT
> <dconnor7@gmail.com> wrote in
>> Im not anti government so I hope none of you think this is slander
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Why do you need money from a man to raise your child?

WHAT?! The man co-created that child, the man is responsible for
co-parenting that child. The government is the mediator and arbiter. If
a couple can't get along enough to stay married then why the f.ck should
they argue about child support? I totally disagree with your position.
teachrmama - 26 Jul 2007 08:00 GMT
>> <dconnor7@gmail.com> wrote in
>>> Im not anti government so I hope none of you think this is slander
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> couple can't get along enough to stay married then why the f.ck should
> they argue about child support? I totally disagree with your position.

You need to find out more about how the system treats people before you
disagree so vehemently with someone's position, Atlanta.  There are many
people who have been really hurt by the Child Support system.  There are
people on this group who never used the CS system to work out the parenting
needs of their children--even though they were no longer married.  They did
just fine.  There are men who post here who did not even know they had
fathered a child until the child was 5, 10 or even more years old.  And they
were suddenly hit with child support orders totalling thousands and
thousands of dollars in arrearages--for children that the mothers did not
tell them about!  Kids they didn't know existed!  How fair is that?  There
are men who lost high paying jobs and had to take lower paying jobs because
their high paying jobs were shipped overseas--but the courts refused to
lower their child support payments because they "knew the men could earn
more if they just tried harder."  Can you imagine this happening in an
intact family? I know the system looks good to you and your ex because it
will assure that the money to support your daughter is taken out of his
check before he can spend it elsewhere, but it is simply not that simple for
everyone.  Why do you think you got so much advice to communicate with your
ex and try to handle things without the government getting involved?  Do you
think we are all a bunch of anti-government rabble rousers?  Many of us have
experienced great unpleasantness as the hands of the system.
Soprano - 26 Jul 2007 08:07 GMT
>>> <dconnor7@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>> Im not anti government so I hope none of you think this is slander
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> think we are all a bunch of anti-government rabble rousers?  Many of us have
> experienced great unpleasantness as the hands of the system.

I have no sympathy for men who don't know where they are planting their
seed. None. f.ck them. My situation is simple. You are right. And I
thank God for that. Its clean. Its easy. I don't have any thoughts about
you. I just can't believe how complicated and f.cked up things are,
that's all. Like I said, I would rather not do this, but I have been
advised to do so by recovering alcoholics and clergy alike and
therapists, so and so forth. It took me one year and two months to get
up the courage to even fill out the paperwork. And a lot of sh.t 
happened in the last 14 months. I believe that it is in my child's
father's BEST interests to file this paper work.
teachrmama - 26 Jul 2007 08:38 GMT
>>>> <dconnor7@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>> Im not anti government so I hope none of you think this is slander
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> I have no sympathy for men who don't know where they are planting their
> seed. None. f.ck them.

How can you say that?  Man and woman are in relationship--whether long term
or a one night stand makes no difference. She finds out she is pregnant and
MOVES AWAY--just breaks it off with no explanation.  How can you blame the
MAN for that? The only one with the knowledge of the pregnancy is HER.  Some
women lie about being on birth control.  Some have actually purposely poked
holes in condoms or saved the used condoms and used the contents later in
order to get pregnant.  How can you blame the man for that?  Do you really
think it is ok for a woman to deprive her child of a father and the father
of his child just so she can wait several years, building up a "savings
account" at his expense?  And, incidentally, making him guilty of a felony
because he becomes so far in arrears?  Have you really though your position
on this all the way through?

My situation is simple. You are right. And I
> thank God for that. Its clean. Its easy. I don't have any thoughts about
> you. I just can't believe how complicated and f.cked up things are, that's
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I believe that it is in my child's father's BEST interests to file this
> paper work.

And it is, ultimately, your choice, Atlanta.
Soprano - 26 Jul 2007 08:58 GMT
>>>>> <dconnor7@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>> Im not anti government so I hope none of you think this is slander
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> because he becomes so far in arrears?  Have you really though your position
> on this all the way through?

Its simple. I have said before and I will say it again. Don't fornicate.
I am a Christian.
teachrmama - 26 Jul 2007 09:25 GMT
>>>>>> <dconnor7@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> Im not anti government so I hope none of you think this is slander
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
> Its simple. I have said before and I will say it again. Don't fornicate. I
> am a Christian.

Oh, I see.  Men aren't supposed to fornicate, so they deserve what they get.
But WOMEN are entitled to thousands and thousands of dollars in back child
support that they "saved up" by not letting the man know he was a father,
because THEY didn't fornicate.  Right?  And their children certainly should
not have to put up with a fornicator for a father.  Right?
DB - 26 Jul 2007 17:58 GMT
"Soprano" <olympiada2007@gmail.com> wrote in

> Its simple. I have said before and I will say it again. Don't fornicate. I
> am a Christian.

If you were a real Christian, where is your understanding, compassion and
forgiveness for your fellow man?

I see from 100's of your posts, it's all about you!

>Stop attacking my marriage. Leave this recovery group alone. As far as
>orgasms go, I could take them or leave them. So what. I don't like being
>that intimate with a man. They really aren't that important, they really
>aren't worth that much. To each their own. Stop judging. And quit writing
>about my sexuality. Its none of your business.

Evidently you think it *is* our business, because you keep telling us all
about it.
Chris - 29 Jul 2007 05:07 GMT
> >>>>> <dconnor7@gmail.com> wrote in
> >>>>>> Im not anti government so I hope none of you think this is slander
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> >
> Its simple. I have said before and I will say it again. Don't fornicate.

That's right. If you are a man, don't fornicate lest you be punished with
many years of financial penalty. But if you are a woman, go right ahead,
fornicate. You will be rewarded with many tens (hundreds?) of thousands of
dollars!

> I am a Christian.
Chris - 29 Jul 2007 05:00 GMT
> >>> <dconnor7@gmail.com> wrote in
> >>>> Im not anti government so I hope none of you think this is slander
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> advised to do so by recovering alcoholics and clergy alike and
> therapists, so and so forth.

Such a FINE group of advisors.

> It took me one year and two months to get
> up the courage to even fill out the paperwork. And a lot of sh.t
> happened in the last 14 months. I believe that it is in my child's
> father's BEST interests to file this paper work.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.