Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Parenting / November 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How to be a good wife!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
DB - 22 Nov 2007 00:37 GMT
If people really want to hold onto a 1950's family model to base there child
support laws on, we could always go back to those days:

This was taken from a 50's home economics text book:

How to be a good wife.

HAVE DINNER READY.  Plan ahead, even the night before to have a delicious
meal on time.  This is a way of letting him know that you have been thinking
about him and are concerned about his needs.  Most men are hungry when they
come home and the prospect of a good meal is part of the warm welcome
needed.

PREPARE YOURSELF.  Take 15 minutes to rest so that you'll be refreshed when
he arrives.  Touch up your make-up, put a ribbon in your hair and be fresh
looking.  He has just been with a lot of work weary people.  Be a little gay
and little more interesting.  His boring day may need a lift.

CLEAR AWAY THE CLUTTER.  Make one last trip through the main part of the
house just before your husband arrives, gathering up school books, toys,
paper, etc.  Then run a dust cloth over the tables.  Your husband will feel
he has reached a haven of rest and order and it will give you a lift too.

PREPARE THE CHILDREN.  Take a few minutes to wash the children's hands and
faces (if they are small), comb their hair, and if necessary, change their
clothes.  They are little treasures and he would like to see them playing
the part.

MINIMIZE ALL NOISE.  At the time of his arrival eliminate all noise of the
washer, dryer, dishwasher, or vacuum.  Try to encourage the children to be
quite.  Be happy to see him.  Great him with a warm smile and be glad to see
him.

SOME DON'TS.  Don't greet him with problems or complaints.  Don't complain
if he's late for dinner.  Count this as minor compared with what he might
have gone through that day.  Make him comfortable.  Have him lean back in a
comfortable chair or suggest he lie down in the bedroom.  Have a cool or
warm drink ready for him.  Arrange his pillow and take off his shoes.  Speak
in a low, soft soothing and pleasant voice.  Allow him to relax and unwind.

LISTEN TO HIM.  You may have a dozen things to tell him, but the moment of
his arrival is not the time.  Let him talk first.

MAKE THE EVENING HIS.  Never complain if he does not take you out to dinner
or to other places of entertainment.  Instead, try to understand his world
of strain and pressure and his need to be home and relax.

THE GOAL.  Try to make your home a place of peace and order where your
husband can renew himself in body and spirit.

No wonder Divorce was not the norm! LOLOLOL
teachrmama - 22 Nov 2007 01:13 GMT
> If people really want to hold onto a 1950's family model to base there
> child support laws on, we could always go back to those days:
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
> No wonder Divorce was not the norm! LOLOLOL

It was also probably much more doable when women stayed home and kept the
house, and men were the breadwinners.  I get home about 15 minutes before my
husband on the days that the girls don't have after school appointments or
activities.  I'm sure I could get all that done in 15 minutes--sure I could.
<chuckle>
Bob Whiteside - 22 Nov 2007 01:34 GMT
>> If people really want to hold onto a 1950's family model to base there
>> child support laws on, we could always go back to those days:
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
> or activities.  I'm sure I could get all that done in 15 minutes--sure I
> could. <chuckle>

Perhaps without realizing it you hit on the problem.  In the 50's the
average federal tax rate was 4-5%.  The government recognized the feminist
movement as a political opportunity to increase taxes and capitalize on
women's desires to be viewed as equals.  As taxes rose, women moved in large
numbers into the workforce.  The result was women needed to work just so
their families could keep pace with enough disposable income to maintain the
status quo after taxes.
DB - 22 Nov 2007 19:47 GMT
"Bob Whiteside" <robertg@teleport.com> wrote in

> Perhaps without realizing it you hit on the problem.  In the 50's the
> average federal tax rate was 4-5%.  The government recognized the feminist
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> just so their families could keep pace with enough disposable income to
> maintain the status quo after taxes.

More money, more government, more problems!

The government  is not the solution, they are the problem!!!!!!!!!!!!!

They have us arguing about $230 a month from a deadbeat father while the
government wastes $Trillions.

What's wrong with this picture?
Angel - 28 Nov 2007 16:46 GMT
I just have one question.  This is 2007 right?  ok just checking.  First
thing is there is dead beat moms out there too.  But we never hear about
them.  I hate hearing about deadbeats fathers there is mothers out there
too!

I am a full time mom and a full time child care provider, husband drives
truck for a living.  Without my little extra income we would be living on
the streets.  These years you have to have both people working.  I do clean
the house when i can and he cooks dinner when he is home.  Now a days it is
50/50 on work and housework.

> "Bob Whiteside" <robertg@teleport.com> wrote in
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> What's wrong with this picture?
DB - 28 Nov 2007 19:15 GMT
"Angel" <angelintheair04@sbcglobal.net> wrote in

> I am a full time mom and a full time child care provider, husband drives
> truck for a living.  Without my little extra income we would be living on
> the streets.  These years you have to have both people working.

And who do we have to thank for that?

The government squanders more money than what we would know what to do with.
If only they had taken all that money and invested in this country, you
would all be far better off.

Here we have regular people trying to scrape by, when the government is
paying the BlackWater corporation $950 a day for each man on their security
force. They had 600 men employed for Katrina for 6 months, You do the math!
There are thousands more in Iraq!

This is just one of thousands of examples!

>> "Bob Whiteside" <robertg@teleport.com> wrote in
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>>
>> What's wrong with this picture?
Gini - 22 Nov 2007 01:47 GMT
> If people really want to hold onto a 1950's family model to base there
> child support laws on, we could always go back to those days:
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> THE GOAL.  Try to make your home a place of peace and order where your
> husband can renew himself in body and spirit.
==
Obviously penned by the human male species.
DB - 22 Nov 2007 02:13 GMT
"Gini" <gini@verizon.com> wrote in

>> THE GOAL.  Try to make your home a place of peace and order where your
>> husband can renew himself in body and spirit.
> ==
> Obviously penned by the human male species.

I remember too well growing up in the 60's that Dad always got home at 4 and
we were to be ready for dinner at 4:30.

Seems that strict environment worked a lot better than what we have today,
no?
Sarah Gray - 22 Nov 2007 02:22 GMT
> "Gini" <gini@verizon.com> wrote in
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Seems that strict environment worked a lot better than what we have today,
> no?

These days, it is much more difficult to support a family on one income.
   (the only way the above is possible)

Signature

Sarah Gray

DB - 22 Nov 2007 19:58 GMT
"Sarah Gray" <anisaerah@duhyahoo.com> wrote in

>> Seems that strict environment worked a lot better than what we have
>> today, no?
>
> These days, it is much more difficult to support a family on one income.
> (the only way the above is possible)

You can blame corporate greed and too much government self interest on that.

Wages haven't increased the same rate of housing,  yet nobody blinks an eye
at this?

Houses that used to be affordable at $45,000 to $80,000 are now selling for
$450,000 to $800,000.
$15/hr in a typical factory used to be a really great wage, are those same
jobs paying $150/hr?

Hell I remember the days when you got 12% in a savings account, what is it
now, 2%!

The banks take everything and give nothing back!
teachrmama - 22 Nov 2007 03:08 GMT
> "Gini" <gini@verizon.com> wrote in
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Seems that strict environment worked a lot better than what we have today,
> no?

Did your mom work outside the home?  Mine didn't, and we had dinner ready at
4:30, so he could wash his hands and we would sit down to dinner.  Of
course, the television never went on until after dinner was eaten, the
dishes were done, and homework was checked.
DB - 22 Nov 2007 17:43 GMT
>> "Gini" <gini@verizon.com> wrote in
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> course, the television never went on until after dinner was eaten, the
> dishes were done, and homework was checked.

In my teens, Mom worked for 2 years in a paper mill, so they could buy a
tent trailer.
We never heard the end of that one! LOL

SO what have all the government experts given us today after injecting
themselves into the education system?
The government has done a fine job at exporting manufacturing jobs  and
companies laying off workers to better their profit margins for investors.

This is the same government that people think  can solve their problems?

The puppets may change, the system stays the same!
Question is, who is running this puppet show?
dejablues - 22 Nov 2007 20:45 GMT
> If people really want to hold onto a 1950's family model to base there
> child support laws on, we could always go back to those days:
>
> This was taken from a 50's home economics text book:

No, it wasn't:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_wife's_guide
DB - 22 Nov 2007 21:15 GMT
>> If people really want to hold onto a 1950's family model to base there
>> child support laws on, we could always go back to those days:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> No, it wasn't:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_wife's_guide

Maybe there should be one for all those stay at home moms that sit around
and get fat all day.

Yes, make the place a living hell to come home to! LOL
Leda.Ismeme@gmail.com - 29 Nov 2007 17:53 GMT
> If people really want to hold onto a 1950's family model to base there child
> support laws on, we could always go back to those days:
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>
> No wonder Divorce was not the norm! LOLOLOL

Divorce wasn't the norm because we were once a socity with morals, and
not because Betty Homemaker was a good wife, although I'm sure that
had a little to do with it. Affairs were kept secret, and if found out
about, were not put out in public. People went to church every Sunday,
and parents had the authority to deal with thier children as they saw
fit with out the government comming to thier home when Lilttle Johnny
got a spanking. Most importantly, the family stayed together. They may
have been unhappy, but they were together.

Men were men, and took care of thier wife, the bills, and child(ren).
Women were women and took care of house chores, cooking, children, and
still looked picture perfect for hubby when he came home from work.
Husbands spent time with the kids, and both parents raised the
children, and the husband paid for *all* of his, the wife, and
child(ren)'s expenses.

If the child support amounts were based on a 1950's idea of family,
the man would pay all expenses (housing, food, clothing, ect). Please
don't give CSE any idea's! Next thing we know *child* support will be
called Woman support, and men will be the one's to pay the price.
DB - 30 Nov 2007 00:40 GMT
<Leda.Ismeme@gmail.com> wrote in

> If the child support amounts were based on a 1950's idea of family,
> the man would pay all expenses (housing, food, clothing, ect). Please
> don't give CSE any idea's! Next thing we know *child* support will be
> called Woman support, and men will be the one's to pay the price.

They pay mummy support now, what's the difference?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.