 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Family Forum / Parenting / Parenting / July 2009meldon pretends he is hero of story but is really scoundrel
he is deadbeat dad who owes over $300K in child support kids don't have food but meldon's fridge has beer > he is deadbeat dad who owes over $300K in child support > kids don't have food but meldon's fridge has beer Wouldn’t a larger amount of arrears suggest a greater offence to the payor? > > he is deadbeat dad who owes over $300K in child support > > kids don't have food but meldon's fridge has beer > > Wouldn’t a larger amount of arrears suggest a greater offence to the > payor? Only if the payor is true. On Jul 3, 11:59 pm, Anonymous <nob...@nymu.eu> wrote: > he is deadbeat dad who owes over $300K in child support > kids don't have food but meldon's fridge has beer Wouldn’t a larger amount of arrears suggest a greater offence to the payor? --------------------------- No, it would not. It just means that there is a sizable sum to pay off. Most likely, the creation of such a large amount came in the form of fees, penalties and interest to an otherwise sizable sum created by the court for non-child support amounts. Many times marital debt, insurance payments, attorneys fees and other non-C$ sums are used to create such debt for the purpose of punishing the defendant for getting uppity with the court for such things as.. sticking to the truth; having verifiable factual evidence; witnesses to verify their facts; able to rebut opposing counsel; exposing lies presented as fact to the court; etc.. Most "Family Court" judges have an agenda and often times they know the opposing attorneys very, very well. If a plaintiff is Pro-se before the court, such tactics are commonly used to keep the Pro-se litigate from presenting his/her evidence and showing to the world that the court is a sham. Most courts detest Pro-se litigates. > On Jul 3, 11:59 pm, Anonymous <nob...@nymu.eu> wrote: > > he is deadbeat dad who owes over $300K in child support [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > presenting his/her evidence and showing to the world that the court is a > sham. Most courts detest Pro-se litigates. Abuse of the law does not mean the law is inherently unjust. It can be just, insofar as it is presented with truth. In the eyes of the unjust, truth is an enemy to be destroyed but this would destroy the grail (and then the family) and then the law and then society. I tell you now, you must trust what is sound and just and true and the law is these things. Dusty wrote: > On Jul 3, 11:59 pm, Anonymous <nob...@nymu.eu> wrote: > > he is deadbeat dad who owes over $300K in child support [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > presenting his/her evidence and showing to the world that the court is a > sham. Most courts detest Pro-se litigates. Abuse of the law does not mean the law is inherently unjust. It can be just, insofar as it is presented with truth. In the eyes of the unjust, truth is an enemy to be destroyed but this would destroy the grail (and then the family) and then the law and then society. I tell you now, you must trust what is sound and just and true and the law is these things. --------------------------- That's all well and good, but when the law is administrated by the corrupt, then the law is corrupt as well. > On Jul 3, 11:59 pm, Anonymous <nob...@nymu.eu> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > --------------------------- > No, it would not. It just means that there is a sizable sum to pay off. So too then, the offense to the recipient. On Jul 4, 3:09 am, "Dusty" <No....@home.org> wrote: > "Gloria Fong" <glorfx...@gmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > --------------------------- > No, it would not. It just means that there is a sizable sum to pay off. So too then, the offense to the recipient. ------------------ Sprechen Sie auf modernes Englisch, Sie täuschen. > "Moderator" <meldon57@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:2e7a8362-0b1f-4489-9d1f-17a16d84fda2@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > ------------------ > Sprechen Sie auf modernes Englisch, Sie täuschen. If life was all about Meldon Fens. Then I would give a sh.t. Meldon is irrelevant, people who speak of Meldon Fens? Even more irrelevant. > > On Jul 4, 3:09 am, "Dusty" <No....@home.org> wrote: > > > [quoted text muted] [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Even more irrelevant. Substandard. If I were trying to say what you were, I would have written: "Meldon is irrelevant. People who speak of Meldon Fens; even more irrelevent." but I would not say what you are trying to say. I would say, "Life is not about Meldon, but Meldon is about life." Meldon serves as "everyman" because he is just and sound and seeks truth and on uncovering it, does what is just and shares that truth. Truth is why Meldon matters and he has many enemies indeed. > Most "Family Court" judges have an agenda and often times they know the > opposing attorneys very, very well. If a plaintiff is Pro-se before the > court, such tactics are commonly used to keep the Pro-se litigate from > presenting his/her evidence and showing to the world that the court is a > sham. Most courts detest Pro-se litigates. Stupid people should avoid being married and perhaps be prohibited from having kids. "If only there was a law" |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.