Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Marriage / Divorce / May 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

X having gf stay over

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Do - 25 May 2005 01:13 GMT
Anyone know anything about My X [ or anyone's X for that matter ] having his
gf stay over the night while the kids are in the house ?

I am in Ct.

When she figures out that he is what he is, she will leave opening the space
for another gf to move on in.She is mothering my children and I resent
that.She has a home of her own but often stays the night in bed with  my X
and the kids are home.
Ty in advance.
Doreen
My Own Doppelganger - 25 May 2005 01:47 GMT
You might want to talk to you lawyer - get a mod to your decree.  My
ex and I had a clause where neither one of us can have a member of the
opposite sex stay overnight...partially due to the fact that our kids
are very young.

Not a cool sitch'...  it can be very damaging to the kids.

>Anyone know anything about My X [ or anyone's X for that matter ] having his
>gf stay over the night while the kids are in the house ?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Ty in advance.
>Doreen

--------
In a cold world you need your friends to keep you warm.
The Dave© - 25 May 2005 03:21 GMT
> You might want to talk to you lawyer - get a mod to your decree.  My
> ex and I had a clause where neither one of us can have a member of the
> opposite sex stay overnight...partially due to the fact that our kids
> are very young.

What if you or your ex wants to get remarried?

Signature

Dave says... fire Dave Hudgens

longshot - 25 May 2005 03:38 GMT
> What if you or your ex wants to get remarried?
exactly what I was thinking...

when you get divorced you give up all rights to nag & bitch, you get his
money & you have to leave him alone now.
Rob
Casey - 25 May 2005 04:07 GMT
The Dave© said
> > You might want to talk to you lawyer - get a mod to your decree.  My
> > ex and I had a clause where neither one of us can have a member of the
> > opposite sex stay overnight...partially due to the fact that our kids
> > are very young.
>
> What if you or your ex wants to get remarried?

I guess it's okay as long as the new spouse doesn't spend the night.

Casey
melned - 25 May 2005 16:09 GMT
> What if you or your ex wants to get remarried?

Then wait till after the wedding  --IMHO. I practice this; my ex. does
not. I hope to be setting a better example for my kids ... time will
tell.
DrLith - 25 May 2005 19:10 GMT
>>What if you or your ex wants to get remarried?
>
> Then wait till after the wedding  --IMHO. I practice this; my ex. does
> not. I hope to be setting a better example for my kids ... time will
> tell.

I will encourage my kids to "try before you buy" when their time comes,
and this is the example I have set for them. YMMV.
Casey - 25 May 2005 19:48 GMT
DrLith said
> >>What if you or your ex wants to get remarried?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I will encourage my kids to "try before you buy" when their time comes,
> and this is the example I have set for them. YMMV.

Ditto for me.

Casey
Rog' - 25 May 2005 20:02 GMT
> I will encourage my kids to "try before you buy" when their
> time comes, and this is the example I have set for them. YMMV.

Humor:  A woman will spend thousands of dollars putting her
wedding together -- buying the dress, sending out invitations,
arranging the reception, but after her first wedding night, she'll
roll over, look at her new husband and think to herself: "Damn,
I could'a bought a house instead."

My ex's grandmother was not a forward thinker, but she did
have this one gem that she told my ex, before we married:
"You really don't know someone, until you've shared a bed
and seen what they look like first thing in the morning."  =R=
m_eL - 25 May 2005 20:56 GMT
>Humor:  A woman will spend thousands of dollars putting her
>wedding together -- buying the dress, sending out invitations,
>arranging the reception, but after her first wedding night, she'll
>roll over, look at her new husband and think to herself: "Damn,
>I could'a bought a house instead."

More humor: (although true, actually)

It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife and $100 to adopt a dog from the
animal shelter.

:-)
longshot - 25 May 2005 21:09 GMT
> It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife

Ooooohhhhhh, I bet it cost him a hell of a lot more than that. :o)
m_eL - 25 May 2005 21:19 GMT
>> It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife
>
>Ooooohhhhhh, I bet it cost him a hell of a lot more than that. :o)

Oh, but i'm worth it... i make sure of that...  ;-)
Rog' - 25 May 2005 21:41 GMT
>>> It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife
>>Ooooohhhhhh, I bet it cost him a hell of a lot more than that. :o)
> Oh, but i'm worth it... i make sure of that...  ;-)

I'm sure that you are worth your weight in gold... as you have
been to this NG!  =R=
m_eL - 26 May 2005 00:04 GMT
>>>> It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife
>>>Ooooohhhhhh, I bet it cost him a hell of a lot more than that. :o)
>> Oh, but i'm worth it... i make sure of that...  ;-)
>
>I'm sure that you are worth your weight in gold... as you have
>been to this NG!  =R=

Roger,
Thank you.  dunno what else to say.  like one of those emotional-nakedness
moments when i would usually make a sex-joke but i won't.  (and i didn't
reject your compliment, see, that's progress on my journey towards healthy
self-esteem)
DrLith - 26 May 2005 01:20 GMT
> >>> It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife
> >>Ooooohhhhhh, I bet it cost him a hell of a lot more than that. :o)
> > Oh, but i'm worth it... i make sure of that...  ;-)
>
> I'm sure that you are worth your weight in gold... as you have
> been to this NG!  =R=

You only say that 'cause you know she's so slender!
Rog' - 25 May 2005 21:38 GMT
>> It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife
>
> Ooooohhhhhh, I bet it cost him a hell of a lot more than that. :o)
... Yep, he's still paying a heavy price for it, too!  :-)  =R=
Joe St. Lucas - 26 May 2005 05:10 GMT
>>It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife and $100 to adopt a dog from the
>>animal shelter.
>Ooooohhhhhh, I bet it cost him a hell of a lot more than that. :o)

Maybe, but I don't have sex with the dog.
m_eL - 26 May 2005 05:34 GMT
>>>It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife and $100 to adopt a dog from the
>>>animal shelter.
>>Ooooohhhhhh, I bet it cost him a hell of a lot more than that. :o)
>
>Maybe, but I don't have sex with the dog.

maybe doggie-style though....
m_eL - 26 May 2005 05:36 GMT
>maybe doggie-style though....

ooops, should clarify, not with the DOG...
Rog' - 26 May 2005 09:18 GMT
>>>It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife
>>>and $100 to adopt a dog from the animal shelter.
>>Ooooohhhhhh, I bet it cost him a hell of a lot more than that. :o)
> Maybe, but I don't have sex with the dog.

But having paid more for the dog...
My Own Doppelganger - 26 May 2005 00:44 GMT
That's cool - as long as the SO (read non-spouse) doesn't spend the
night while the kids are under the same roof.

>> You might want to talk to you lawyer - get a mod to your decree.  My
>> ex and I had a clause where neither one of us can have a member of the
>> opposite sex stay overnight...partially due to the fact that our kids
>> are very young.
>
>What if you or your ex wants to get remarried?

--------
In a cold world you need your friends to keep you warm.
The Dave© - 26 May 2005 17:14 GMT
> My Own Doppelganger wrote:
> That's cool - as long as the SO (read non-spouse) doesn't spend the
> night while the kids are under the same roof.

Just curious, but exactly *why* is that such a big deal?

Signature

Dave says... Fire Dave Hudgens

My Own Doppelganger - 27 May 2005 02:56 GMT
For kids that age (6 & 3) it will confuse the hell out of them.  Not
that this is the case with my ex, but all the old school psych babble
will tell ya that a mom who sleeps around in front (not literally) of
their kids will create some f* up kids.

>> My Own Doppelganger wrote:
>> That's cool - as long as the SO (read non-spouse) doesn't spend the
>> night while the kids are under the same roof.
>
>Just curious, but exactly *why* is that such a big deal?

--------
In a cold world you need your friends to keep you warm.
The Dave© - 26 May 2005 17:15 GMT
> My Own Doppelganger wrote:
> That's cool - as long as the SO (read non-spouse) doesn't spend the
> night while the kids are under the same roof.

Just curious, but exactly *why* is that such a big deal?

Signature

Dave says... Fire Dave Hudgens

Nearl J Icarus - 27 May 2005 10:45 GMT
>> My Own Doppelganger wrote:
>> That's cool - as long as the SO (read non-spouse) doesn't spend the
>> night while the kids are under the same roof.
>
>Just curious, but exactly *why* is that such a big deal?

My ex's boyfriends thought they could act as if they were the father. My kids
were pretty quick to tell them otherwise. Sometimes they weren't very civil
about it (my kids, that is).
Casey - 25 May 2005 04:01 GMT
My Own Doppelganger said

> You might want to talk to you lawyer - get a mod to your decree.  My
> ex and I had a clause where neither one of us can have a member of the
> opposite sex stay overnight...partially due to the fact that our kids
> are very young.

At some point one or both of you will consider that to be an
unreasonable restraint.  What if you date someone for months?

Casey
My Own Doppelganger - 26 May 2005 00:45 GMT
Stay overnight while the kids are under the same roof as the SO.

>My Own Doppelganger said
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Casey

--------
In a cold world you need your friends to keep you warm.
Claim Guy - 25 May 2005 03:05 GMT
> Anyone know anything about My X [ or anyone's X for that matter ] having his
> gf stay over the night while the kids are in the house ?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Ty in advance.
> Doreen

No, I have no personal knowledge of anyone sleeping with your ex, cause I
don't know, or care, who the hell any of you are.

What do you expect us to say?

Learn to live with this or go nuts.

Pretty much everyone who is divorced with kids has to face up to another
parental figure becoming involved in their children's lives. You won't be
any different.You can resent it all you like, but so what? You are the one
who will get eaten up from the inside.

And just because you can't stand him doesn't mean that another woman won't
think he is the most wonderful man on earth. I bet he is saying some pretty
nasty stuff about you and you probably think you are just fine and worthy of
love.

So do you plan on having just one more relationship for the rest of your
life? Straight from this one to another lifelong commitment?

Your pain and anger is driving your thought processes. It's normal, but you
have to realize it is happening in order to be able to work through it.

How long have you been apart?
DrLith - 25 May 2005 04:08 GMT
> > Anyone know anything about My X [ or anyone's X for that matter ] having
> his
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Learn to live with this or go nuts.

Seconded. Unless you already have something written into your divorce
decree, you can't do anything about it. Complaining about it will only make
you look bitter and jealous. They will then snicker about you behind their
back and proceed to undermine you in every conceivable way, since after all,
you are just a bitter, jealous ex and not a cooperative co-parent. What you
call "mothering" your children is likely nothing more than treating them
kindly and taking an interest in them. You would probably not be resentful
if it were a teacher or babysitter or some other such figure doing the same
things.

DrLith, wishes she could farm out mothering duty more often
Casey - 25 May 2005 04:11 GMT
DrLith said

> What you
> call "mothering" your children is likely nothing more than treating them
> kindly and taking an interest in them.

Exactly ... would the OP be happier if the g/f treated the kids like
dirt instead?

Casey
John Riggs - 25 May 2005 05:45 GMT
| > > Anyone know anything about My X [ or anyone's X for that matter ] having
| > his
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
|
| DrLith, wishes she could farm out mothering duty more often

   I have to agree.
Do - 25 May 2005 14:53 GMT
Calm down mean man.

Let him remarry, i will personally buy the flowers for the wedding.

I am trying to get the kids to my house more often and if he can't sleep
with a gf when the kids are in the house, that will get them to my house.
Do

> > Anyone know anything about My X [ or anyone's X for that matter ] having
> his
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> How long have you been apart?
Joe St. Lucas - 25 May 2005 15:26 GMT
>I am trying to get the kids to my house more often and if he can't sleep
>with a gf when the kids are in the house, that will get them to my house.
>Do

If there's nothing in your divorce decree that specifies "no overnight guests"
then there;s nothing you can do w/o going back to court.  I'd have thought
he'd want the kids gone so they wouldn't interrupt the two of them, or maybe
he's just playing the "i have the kids and you can't have them on my nights"
thing.
John Riggs - 25 May 2005 16:47 GMT
    You know, there is absolutely no law forbidding him from having a
girlfriend.
If he lets you have the kids more often, it is probably because he's trying
to be a nice guy.
Leave it lay and get on with your life. The only one you will hurt with this
behavior, is yourself.
   Get over it!

| Calm down mean man.
|
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
| >
| > How long have you been apart?
Do - 25 May 2005 21:56 GMT
What i haven't mentioned is that he has poisoned the kids against me and
they do not spend the nights here that they are suppose to.

I figure this may be a way to get them back a bit more.

I am all in favor of him having a gf. let him leave me alone and spend time
with her.

Why can't you all understand that some people are evil and hurt others? My
attorney typed up over 75+ examples of him being in contempt of court.
Do, plz believe me.

>      You know, there is absolutely no law forbidding him from having a
> girlfriend.
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
> | >
> | > How long have you been apart?
Claim Guy - 25 May 2005 23:06 GMT
> What i haven't mentioned is that he has poisoned the kids against me and
> they do not spend the nights here that they are suppose to.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> attorney typed up over 75+ examples of him being in contempt of court.
> Do, plz believe me.

Three sides to every story - and the truth is rarely told in one-sided
newsgroup posts.

If they don't spend the nights they are supposed to, he is in violation of a
court order, or agreement and you should address that.

Legal note for you - "contempt of court" is a legal ruling made by the
court. Your attorney is alleging 75 incidents that he feels could be grounds
for contempt - and I bet he got all 75 examples from you, so we are back to
the first issue.

If your attorney has over 75 examples of contempt and you can;t get the kids
when you are supposed to, you need another attorney.

You shouldn't try and use the "poisoning" argument as justification for
manipulation of your ex's personal life.
Deal with the agreements or orders and quit trying to play the angles.
-Calliope- - 26 May 2005 05:28 GMT
>  What i haven't mentioned is that he has poisoned the kids against me
>  and they do not spend the nights here that they are suppose to.

Do, how old are your children again?  (I'm sorry, it's been a while since
you've posted and I've forgotten.)

I think you are going about this situation all wrong, it comes across (at
least in a textual context, as manipulative).. and if he's actively
poisoning them against you, you're only giving him new ammunition to
achieve that poisoning, IMO.

> I figure this may be a way to get them back a bit more.

How?  If they are refusing to come now, even with a court order, what
makes you think this one would be different?

> I am all in favor of him having a gf. let him leave me alone and spend
> time with her.
>
> Why can't you all understand that some people are evil and hurt
> others? My attorney typed up over 75+ examples of him being in
> contempt of court. Do, plz believe me.

Okay, if there are over 75 examples of his not following the court orders,
why isn't your attorney doing anything about that?  What is he doing with
these examples.  I would be thoroughly annoyed if he was just sitting on
them.

As far as the ex having someone sleep over, unless it was written in the
original agreement or court order, I doubt you'll be able to go anywhere
with that one.  

It sucks, if the parent is dragging new people into their lives
consistently, but if it is someone they are making a life with, there
isn't probably going to be major harm, particularly if the person is
trying to be a decent adult in their lives. (This is a very difficult one
to deal sometimes *believe* me, I know!)  It is far, far better to have a
decent person involved with your ex than a beyotch.. seriously!  

My ex is married to a nasty old harridan, who has pretty much eroded the
realtionship the children have with their dad, sadly.  (Yes, I know it is
his fault for allowing it, but I do believe she orchestrated their
estrangement intentionally and quite methodically.  But hey.. DS has only
been home from college for just under a week...who cares if he doesn't
bother calling back to even talk to the kid?.-sorry mini-vent)

I can only imagine how difficult it must be to have kids that refuse to
come when they're scheduled to be in your custody.  It must be incredibly
painul.  But trying to manipulate them into coming will probably only
backfire in the long run.

As for you, I'm left wondering.  Are you seeing a counselor to help you
deal with this?  I've the impression you could probably use someone talk
with about this.  I know I would, if I were in your shoes.

Take care.
Signature

Cal~

calliope 123 at gmail dot com

John Riggs - 26 May 2005 05:33 GMT
   Actually, reading your words, it sounds more like you are doing it to
yourself. You are your own worst enemy right now.
He doesn't have to do a thing, and kids aren't that dumb.

| What i haven't mentioned is that he has poisoned the kids against me and
| they do not spend the nights here that they are suppose to.
[quoted text clipped - 83 lines]
| > | >
| > | > How long have you been apart?
DrLith - 25 May 2005 19:10 GMT
>  Calm down mean man.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> with a gf when the kids are in the house, that will get them to my house.
> Do

A bit manipulative...but...if that's the main issue, why not get brownie
points by suggesting you'd be happy to have the kids more often so he
can have some "private time" with his honey?

It is possible that won't work, but forbidding him to have his gf sleep
over is not only guaranteed not to work, but may well backfire for the
reasons I mentioned earlier.
Claim Guy - 25 May 2005 23:01 GMT
> Calm down mean man.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> with a gf when the kids are in the house, that will get them to my house.
> Do

Oh you calm down - papering over lady.

You're talking out of both sides of your mouth.

A tad manipulative, aren't we?
Casey - 25 May 2005 04:06 GMT
Do said

> Anyone know anything about My X [ or anyone's X for that matter ] having his
> gf stay over the night while the kids are in the house ?

I'd be more concerned about the g/f if she were mistreating the kids
or behaving poorly in front of them.   It would be awful if he were
bringing home a different woman every night.  Having a steady g/f
that quietly spends the night sometimes isn't the end of the world.

> When she figures out that he is what he is, she will leave opening the space
> for another gf to move on in.She is mothering my children and I resent
> that.She has a home of her own but often stays the night in bed with  my X
> and the kids are home.
> Ty in advance.

Not much you can do about it ... after all, it is his life.

Casey
m_eL - 25 May 2005 04:30 GMT
>Do said
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Not much you can do about it ... after all, it is his life.

OP,
i recall others here in the past being really upset about the ex's new SO
being around the kids and stuff.   i was practically the devil him/herself
when i suggested an ex might actually marry the new lover!   i acknowledge the
fact that it must feel terribly frustrating and awkward, but like everybody
said here, you'll have to accept it whether you like it or not.  Also from
past ASD experience, you'll probably feel angry and want to strike out at
those of us telling you that you have to accept it.  I hope the kids will be
ok and that you'll find peace in your own life as well.  Vent here all you
need to, hope it helps.
ed_spain - 25 May 2005 10:25 GMT
Hi Do,

My STBX, who did her homework very well before making what _I_ consider
a horrible decision, said that after we get over the inital breakup, we
will still have to go through hell at least twice more: once for the
actual divorce, and once when the ex gets a SO in their life.

Of course, having a stream of GFs through his life, all involved in the
kids life, is not going to be the best for them. However, morally, I
would not call what your ex is doing RIGHT NOW "mistreating" the kids,
and I guess a court won't see it that way, either. I can understand
your resentment, but my advice would be to keep it to yourself. If
you're anything like me, you'll feel A LOT of resentment about A LOT of
things, but you have to keep a handle on your emotions and concentrate
on pragmatically doing the best for your kids.

What's the saying about god giving me the strength to change the things
that I can, to ability to let go of the things that I can't change, and
the wisdom to tell the difference? I think this is one of those "let it
go" type of cases.

Good luck, Do, and I hope I can listen to my own advice when my ex has
someone staying over night with her ;->   Hmmm, just typing that really
got my emotions going!!!!

Ed
Rog' - 25 May 2005 11:53 GMT
> Hi Do, <snip>
> Of course, having a stream of GFs through his life, all involved
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> keep a handle on your emotions and concentrate on pragmatically
> doing the best for your kids. <snip>

I agree.
It may have to be ordered, but for an insightful (albeit Holllywood)
look at this issue, I highly recommend that folks find or rent a 1979
movie with Dustin Hoffman and Meryl Streep called, "Kramer vs.
Kramer." The courtroom fight in which the ex-wife raises the issue
is extremely intense.  [5 Oscars, incl. Best Picture, Actor, Actress]
=R=
Dixie - 25 May 2005 20:46 GMT
> Anyone know anything about My X [ or anyone's X for that matter ] having his
> gf stay over the night while the kids are in the house ?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Ty in advance.
> Doreen

Both my ex and I had the morality clause in our divorce agreement
(neither he nor I could have someone over night while the kids were
present).  So far, no problems.  He has a gf but I'm bf-free and liking
it alot.  Anyway, we both feel like we should make appearances in front
of the kids even if we do other things while they are away.

So, unless you have such an agreement, there's really not much you can
do.  Just don't quiz your kids over it and put them on the spot.  My
$0.02 worth.
WhansaMi - 25 May 2005 23:28 GMT
> Both my ex and I had the morality clause in our divorce agreement
> (neither he nor I could have someone over night while the kids were
> present).  So far, no problems.  He has a gf but I'm bf-free and liking
> it alot.  Anyway, we both feel like we should make appearances in front
> of the kids even if we do other things while they are away.

Dixie, this is curious to me.

I lived with my DH before we got married, with my kids from a former
marriage.  I don't believe it is morally wrong for adults in a committed,
monogamous marriage to have sex, assuming it is honest and responsible.  I
would guess, given that, I would feel the opposite way if I believed it was
wrong --- I wouldn't let them see it, because I wouldn't do it.

My DH's ex lived with her boyfriend (with whom she had an extramarital
affair), but told the children it was "okay, because he slept beside the bed
on the floor".  :-p

I guess what I don't understand is... if someone really believes it is
wrong, why would they do it?  I don't do things I believe are morally wrong.
And, if they don't believe it is wrong, why would they hide it?

Sheila
Bill in Co. - 25 May 2005 23:45 GMT
>> Both my ex and I had the morality clause in our divorce agreement
>> (neither he nor I could have someone over night while the kids were
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> I guess what I don't understand is... if someone really believes it is
> wrong, why would they do it?  I don't do things I believe are morally wrong.

Then you're a notable exception - in this world.    I figure we have a
handful or two left.
Rog' - 26 May 2005 00:55 GMT
> I guess what I don't understand is... if someone really believes
> it is wrong, why would they do it?  I don't do things I believe
> are morally wrong. And, if they don't believe it is wrong, why
> would they hide it?

Because adults like to engage in hypocrisy.  They don't want kids
thinking that its okay, even if they think its okay.  So, they only
have hanky-panky when the kids are away, as if any kid with over the
age of 12 with ears who doesn't know what's really going on.

While the adults are sneaking around, the kids are probably out
smoking pot and downloading porn off the net.  Nothing ever
changes.  When I was 16, I walked in on my dad and soon-2-B
stepmother.  At least I got to peak at their copy of "Joy of Sex"
when they were out of the house.  :-)  =R=

m_eL - 26 May 2005 01:24 GMT
>> I guess what I don't understand is... if someone really believes
>> it is wrong, why would they do it?  I don't do things I believe
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>thinking that its okay, even if they think its okay.  So, they only
>have hanky-panky when the kids are away,

I think it's hurtful to kids, to a spouse, and even to one's SELF when people
feel they need to "hide" something.   I've tried to always be very open with
my kids about things like sex, drugs, etc. so that they don't feel they have
to *hide* things from me and can even ask for advice if they want to.  And
they have.   I don't hide anything from my spouse, no matter how personal or
"embarassing" it might be, becuz i believe secrets and deceptions damage a
marriage.  I'd rather know about something even if it's somewhat
uncomfortable, than to later find out something was kept from me.    My
parents were of the "do as i say, not as i do" thing and thus i found myself
feeling the need to hide things from them.

If single parents have SO's and they don't want their kids to know they sleep
with the SO, then don't sleep with the SO.   It's just better not to have to
lie or deceive anyone.  IMO.
Bill in Co. - 26 May 2005 02:06 GMT
>> I guess what I don't understand is... if someone really believes
>> it is wrong, why would they do it?  I don't do things I believe
>> are morally wrong. And, if they don't believe it is wrong, why
>> would they hide it?
>
> Because adults like to engage in hypocrisy.

SOME adults engage in hypocrisy.    Speak for yourself, bubba!
kato - 26 May 2005 02:37 GMT
> When I was 16, I walked in on my dad and soon-2-B
> stepmother.  At least I got to peak at their copy of "Joy of Sex"
> when they were out of the house.  :-)  =R=

Talking about parents having sex is just gross..my parents never, ever had
sex......ever!
m_eL - 26 May 2005 03:15 GMT
>> When I was 16, I walked in on my dad and soon-2-B
>> stepmother.  At least I got to peak at their copy of "Joy of Sex"
>> when they were out of the house.  :-)  =R=
>
>Talking about parents having sex is just gross..my parents never, ever had
>sex......ever!

neither did mine!!!! ggrrrooossssssss!!!  ewwww!!!! icky!
(OTOH, i feel warm and cozy thinking about the fact i was conceived out of
love as opposed to bought at the "baby store")

I think they just don't need to see/hear it happening, that's traumatic to a
kid.
Rog' - 26 May 2005 04:21 GMT
kato:
>>Talking about parents having sex is just gross..my parents
>>never, ever had sex......ever!
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> conceived out of love as opposed to bought at the "baby
> store")

Huh?  It was my understanding that we were brought from a
distant land by storks, carried by their beaks... but I have to
admit to wondering why a stork would do that.  =R=
DrLith - 26 May 2005 04:33 GMT
> kato:
> >>Talking about parents having sex is just gross..my parents
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> distant land by storks, carried by their beaks... but I have to
> admit to wondering why a stork would do that.  =R=

Would go a long way toward 'splainin' why yer legs are so scrawny.

DrLith, brought from a distant land by hippos
WhansaMi - 26 May 2005 11:39 GMT
> >> When I was 16, I walked in on my dad and soon-2-B
> >> stepmother.  At least I got to peak at their copy of "Joy of Sex"
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I think they just don't need to see/hear it happening, that's traumatic to a
> kid.

I agree.  I have always taken precautions to ensure that didn't happen --
locking doors, playing the "Very, very quiet game" when they are in the
house, etc.

But, I see that as different than this.

Sheila
John Riggs - 26 May 2005 04:20 GMT
   Mine either, which in retrospect would make all 5 of us immaculate
conceptions. Hmmmm....might account the names.

| > When I was 16, I walked in on my dad and soon-2-B
| > stepmother.  At least I got to peak at their copy of "Joy of Sex"
| > when they were out of the house.  :-)  =R=
|
| Talking about parents having sex is just gross..my parents never, ever had
| sex......ever!
DrLith - 26 May 2005 02:22 GMT
> I guess what I don't understand is... if someone really believes it is
> wrong, why would they do it?  I don't do things I believe are morally wrong.
> And, if they don't believe it is wrong, why would they hide it?

I'll let Dixie answer for herself, but I think that in part it relates to
the similar discussion on Another Newsgroup. In that one, we discussed to
what lengths different couples go to shield their sex lives in general from
their kids, even if they're married and all living under one roof. (If I
recall, you were among the more "private" couples!) I think there are many
things that adults do or have done that they think are morally ok but that
they not only don't want their kids to see. Not only in a literal sense of
directly witnessing, but in the broader sense of not wanting the kids to
even know they engage in.
WhansaMi - 26 May 2005 03:03 GMT
> > I guess what I don't understand is... if someone really believes it is
> > wrong, why would they do it?  I don't do things I believe are morally
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> directly witnessing, but in the broader sense of not wanting the kids to
> even know they engage in.

Yes, I was among the more "private" group.  :-)

But, I don't see that it is the same at all.  What I object to is kids
having the opportunity to witness sex between any adults -- not just
parents.

If I follow your thinking above, it seems to me that these folks would also
not live together even when married.

It doesn't make any sense to me.

Sheila
DrLith - 26 May 2005 04:46 GMT
> > > I guess what I don't understand is... if someone really believes it is
> > > wrong, why would they do it?  I don't do things I believe are morally
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> If I follow your thinking above, it seems to me that these folks would also
> not live together even when married.

I'm saying that some people perhaps include "sex between unmarried partners"
(and not "sex" period, which seems to be how you are reading it) in that
range of things that they consider morally ok but that they don't want their
kids to know they do. I might compare it to certain "non-vanilla" sex
practices, for example. Maybe you enjoy a little S&M or D&S. You think this
is morally ok. But you don't just want your kids not to *see* it. You don't
want them to have the faintest inkling that you do it. If they asked you,
you might even say you don't do it.

> It doesn't make any sense to me.

Well, it's not a totally bullet-proof logic (and it's not a position I hold
myself!) And I'll also agree that no matter how you slice it, there's a
certain level of hypocracy involved.

DrLith, reprises her "we all have our moments of hypocracy. Mine is yelling
at my kids to be quiet" speech
-Calliope- - 26 May 2005 05:04 GMT
> I'm saying that some people perhaps include "sex between unmarried
> partners" (and not "sex" period, which seems to be how you are reading
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> faintest inkling that you do it. If they asked you, you might even say
> you don't do it.

Sheesh... all three groups are now getting into the whole parents/sex
talk!  Is there something in the water, these days? lol.

Signature

Cal~

calliope 123 at gmail dot com

WhansaMi - 26 May 2005 11:36 GMT
> > > > I guess what I don't understand is... if someone really believes it is
> > > > wrong, why would they do it?  I don't do things I believe are morally
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> want them to have the faintest inkling that you do it. If they asked you,
> you might even say you don't do it.

Well, you may not have noticed, but I didn't respond to that portion of the
thread, because that didn't make sense to me either!  :-O

Sheila
Barbara Sz. - 25 May 2005 22:02 GMT
My son was 14 when we divorced, and a mere 4 months after it was final,
my ex started dating a 14-year younger woman who used to babysit our
son when she was a teenager. When he informed me some 6 months later
that they intended to marry another 10 months from that, he agreed with
my request that she not sleep in the house when our son was there. He
gave his word.

About 10 weeks before the wedding, the woman's mother sold the house
that they had been sharing. My ex approached me with the "only"
solution to her lack of housing, that she move in with him and our son.
Into the house I still legally co-owned. I, of course, reminded him of
his promise, suggested more than 1/2 a dozen alternatives to her living
in the house in front of our son, including our son moving in with me
for the 10 weeks.

I was rather vehement about my opinion on the subject, and after I had
been so, I found out from our son that she had already been spending
the night on occasion for about 2 weeks anyway. So I was trying to shut
the barn door after the horse had gotten out, and made a big deal about
something that had already happened.

Which is how my son viewed it. He even wrote us both a letter stating
his opinion that he didn't see what the big deal was and he didn't
really want to never sleep at his dad's house for the next 10 weeks.
Had I known that it had already happened, I wouldn't have made such a
big deal about it. I ended up having to "give in" for my son's sake.

The truth is, you don't really have any control over your ex's behavior
any more than you want to let your ex have control over your behavior.
You can try to negotiate more time at your place with the kids by
"offering" to keep them when your ex has his gf over, as a favor if you
will, to give them privacy and time to themselves. It certainly might
work better than getting bent out of shape than getting pissy about the
moral issue or expressing your resentment.

And, as far as your resentment of this woman mothering your children, I
think you should be grateful that she is interested and willing to
mother them and not ignore them or treat them worse than pets. The more
people who love our children and take care of them and look after them,
the better off they are, not worse.

As my son is pretty much already raised and has a perfectly competent
mother, and his stepmother is only 15 years older than he is and hardly
in a position to be much more than a "big sister" (which is how my son
had thought of her since he was very small), I don't really have to
worry about the issues you do. And, my ex did marry this girl, so there
aren't revolving gfs to worry about.

You could try to have the decree altered to include a clause about SO
sleepovers, but it would probably only make things worse between you
and your ex. Which really isn't good for the kids, trust me on that
one. Even with older kids.

I certainly wouldn't try the "kids have to stay with me when the gf is
spending the night" route, I can guarantee you from experience, it
doesn't work. Good luck! -- Barbara Sz.
A man - 26 May 2005 15:04 GMT
On Tue, 24 May 2005 20:13:48 -0400 in article <waednWKjD9qjXg7fRVn-
pg@comcast.com>, doglasser@comcast.net spoke thusly...
> Anyone know anything about My X [ or anyone's X for that matter ] having his
> gf stay over the night while the kids are in the house ?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> that.She has a home of her own but often stays the night in bed with  my X
> and the kids are home.

Many people say that having a GF stay over while the kids are there is really
bad form. In some states (Michigan) if a bg/gf moves in to the house, then
the parent who got the house must pay the other parent his share of the
equity. Psychologists say it's hard for the kids (especially younger ones) to
meet these people, thinking they will be a new step-parent, only to have them
gone after 3-6 months.

Dr. Laura says a bf/gf should not even meet the kids until they are engaged
to the parent.

Let me give you my experience as a kid of divorced parents. Parents divorced
when I was 5. I didn't mind meeting her new boyfriends (which started within
a year). But it was hard to see them go if she had been dating them for 3
years, and they broke up. Because by then I had gotten to know them and I had
fun with them. This happened about 3 times, when mom would date someone for 3
or more years, then break up. The break up was harder for me each time, and I
eventually learned that no relationship is permanent.

Signature

Sig: Say no to fixed width HTML tables. They look terrible in most browsers.

Joe St. Lucas - 26 May 2005 15:26 GMT
>Let me give you my experience as a kid of divorced parents. Parents divorced
>when I was 5. I didn't mind meeting her new boyfriends (which started within
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>or more years, then break up. The break up was harder for me each time, and I
>eventually learned that no relationship is permanent.

Guess your mom was a person who couldn't commit to any relationship.
saulgoode - 26 May 2005 19:10 GMT
> On Tue, 24 May 2005 20:13:48 -0400 in article <waednWKjD9qjXg7fRVn-
> pg@comcast.com>, doglasser@comcast.net spoke thusly...
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Dr. Laura says a bf/gf should not even meet the kids until they are engaged
> to the parent.

You'll want to meet the kids and see how the SO/kids interact well
before you start planning a wedding, not to mention that Laura doesn't
consider sole-custody situations and the inconvenience this rule would
impose. This sounds like a penalty against divorced parents rather than
good advice from an objective doctor.

On the original post, I second all the let-it-be opinions. You should
set an example for the children yourself rather than hound the ex to be
more like you. Eventually the children will choose their path. My
opinion is it's not okay to have a sleep-over, given my son is only
4yo, and the one time a girl wound up there while I had the boy I made
her sleep on the couch. I may change my tune one day.

If using the situation as legal leverage, then I'd say you're probably
SOL -- nothing here points to anything harmful to the children, or even
that unusual, and if you're not the primary custodian, which sounds
like the case, then I'm shakin my head trying to figure out what you're
after.

- Saul
Casey - 26 May 2005 21:41 GMT
saulgoode said
> > Many people say that having a GF stay over while the kids are there is really
> > bad form. In some states (Michigan) if a bg/gf moves in to the house, then
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> consider sole-custody situations and the inconvenience this rule would
> impose.

Yeah, it would be pretty hard for me to have any type of relationship
without my son meeting the woman early on.  Since he lives here full
time, I can't exactly have a relaxing night at home watching a good DVD
if he's excluded.  Besides, if he and the prospect are not going to be
compatible, I'd rather know it sooner than later.

> This sounds like a penalty against divorced parents rather than
> good advice from an objective doctor.

That doctor loves to give righteous-sounding advice.

In reality, everyone's situation is different and there are degrees of
everything.  It's not like I just randomly bring anyone over to the
house for a while - I won't even consider dating anyone that I would
not want my son to meet.

Casey
Barbara Sz. - 27 May 2005 04:09 GMT
You could always hook up with one of your former babysitters and have
the compatibility issue settled really early on. ;) I could say more,
but you've all heard it before and are more than tired of it as I
recall. :) -- Barbara Sz.

> saulgoode said
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> if he's excluded.  Besides, if he and the prospect are not going to be
> compatible, I'd rather know it sooner than later.
Casey - 27 May 2005 15:20 GMT
Barbara Sz. said
> > saulgoode said
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> You could always hook up with one of your former babysitters and have
> the compatibility issue settled really early on. ;)

Oh, I could never do that ... my son never really had any babysitters
worth considering.

> I could say more,
> but you've all heard it before and are more than tired of it as I
> recall. :) -- Barbara Sz.

Oh, what the heck ... go ahead.  You've earned the right!



Casey
Barbara Sz. - 28 May 2005 04:37 GMT
Obviously you're a man of more discerning tastes than my ex then. But I
figured that out pretty quickly after arriving here a couple of years
ago, so of course it is obvious. :)

As for saying more, I don't really have anything more to say than what
I've said a gazillion times before. Eventually, I suppose I'll get it
out of my system... -- Barbara Sz.
Casey - 28 May 2005 04:46 GMT
Barbara Sz. said

> Obviously you're a man of more discerning tastes than my ex then.

That's right, I'm darned picky - not just any babysitter will do!

> But I
> figured that out pretty quickly after arriving here a couple of years
> ago, so of course it is obvious. :)

Hey, that might be the nicest thing anyone has said to me today ... I
think.

> As for saying more, I don't really have anything more to say than what
> I've said a gazillion times before. Eventually, I suppose I'll get it
> out of my system... -- Barbara Sz.

Maybe, maybe not.  Keep trying though until you do even if it takes a
gazillion more times.

Talk about aggravated .... suddenly I'm running into my ex everywhere I
go.  I was invited to a big party tonight at a private residence.  
Drove up, parked at the first spot which was a few blocks away, and
then walked right by my ex's vehicle parked on the street.  

I turned around, walked back to my car, and left.  This is getting old
in a hurry.

Casey
Barbara Sz. - 28 May 2005 05:03 GMT
I feel your pain, although I usually don't run into my ex anywhere, I
usually know ahead of time when he's going to be somewhere I am. Like
at my old church on June 5. My Chorale is singing both services there.
I haven't been there when he and the wife have been in town since I
left that church Jan 2003. And it's depressing enough going there when
I know they're not going to be there, little alone when I'm thinking
they will be there. And wouldn't you know it, my parents are out of
town that weekend. Sigh.

Of course, there is the fact that I typically don't go anywhere or do
anything, so it's unlikely that I'm going to run into my ex anywhere as
I told him last August that he was no longer welcome behind the
security gates to the parking lot nor across my threshold. I can go
weeks and months without running into him.

Last weekend my son and I and friends of ours went to see "Revenge of
the Sith" on Saturday morning and then out to lunch. The first place my
friends suggested was a Mexican restaurant we've all frequented for
years, but I don't go there anymore since last fall when The
After-Wedding Party was held there. And, for some reason I keep
fixating on the oncoming of June 15, what would have been my 20th
wedding anniversary. To my detriment.

It doesn't help either that my colleague (who's spouse dumped her in a
classic mid-life crisis move after 20 years of marriage -- and they had
one of those oh-my-gosh-perfect-looking marriages -- not too long after
I got dumped) has a new boyfriend. So apparently she's managed to move
on, which, oddly enough, makes me angry. With her, with myself, with
life in general.

Sorry, I guess I'm just too depressed and depressing. --Barbara Sz.

>Talk about aggravated .... suddenly I'm running into my ex everywhere I
>go.  I was invited to a big party tonight at a private residence.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>I turned around, walked back to my car, and left.  This is getting old
>in a hurry
rj - 28 May 2005 05:13 GMT
(snip)

>Talk about aggravated .... suddenly I'm running into my ex everywhere I
>go.  I was invited to a big party tonight at a private residence.  
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Casey

Bummer.

Maybe you ought to be proactive about building a new and different
circle of acquaintances.  Not suggesting that you abandon the old
ones... but a new branch to your personal network might give you some
parties to go to that don't include your ex.  Just a thought...

rj
Casey - 28 May 2005 16:05 GMT
rj said

> (snip)
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> ones... but a new branch to your personal network might give you some
> parties to go to that don't include your ex.  Just a thought...

It's a good thought, but this is a very small town.  There are only a
few popular places to go and I was firmly established in one before she
moved back to town and suddenly started appearing there.  And yes, her
friends who I know very well were very aware that I frequented there.

It's also a very intermingled social network of singles - basically one
big branch.  This was a big party that a lot of my friends (including
one woman I'm somewhat interested in) were attending.

My social world has been suddenly invaded.

Casey
John Riggs - 28 May 2005 06:48 GMT
   My ex had a sudden urge to make my old hang outs her own.....didn't work
too well for her. Friends, Club owners, bouncers, and various security
people kept tossing her and her date out whenever they would even look my
direction.I suspect if you just go about your business, she'll have the same
results. It seems to work that way......and you are a peaceable, likable guy
that don't cause no trouble.

| Barbara Sz. said
|
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
|
| Casey
-Calliope- - 28 May 2005 15:32 GMT
> Talk about aggravated .... suddenly I'm running into my ex everywhere I
> go.  I was invited to a big party tonight at a private residence.  
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I turned around, walked back to my car, and left.  This is getting old
> in a hurry.

Egads!  My worst nightmare.  I swear there's gotta be something in the air
lately.

My ex called to offer a few things he didn't need, to help me fix up my
house on Thursday.  SO's ex wrote him a letter that was basically just
'(ex)family chitchat'..  Weird.
Signature

Cal~

calliope 123 at gmail dot com

Casey - 28 May 2005 16:01 GMT
-Calliope- said

> > Talk about aggravated .... suddenly I'm running into my ex everywhere I
> > go.  I was invited to a big party tonight at a private residence.  
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> house on Thursday.  SO's ex wrote him a letter that was basically just
> '(ex)family chitchat'..  Weird.

Yeah, what the heck is going on with all this?

Not only have I run into my ex, but she waves in an effort to get me to
talk for a while.  That's when I quickly bury myself in a group of
friends.

Casey
-Calliope- - 28 May 2005 16:04 GMT
> Yeah, what the heck is going on with all this?

SO thinks that they are feeling lonely, and reaching out to those that once
loved them.  Sort of makes sense to me, but they are (all three of them)..
the ones that originally wanted out of the marriages.  

Signature

Cal~

calliope 123 at gmail dot com

Casey - 29 May 2005 05:15 GMT
-Calliope- said

> > Yeah, what the heck is going on with all this?
>
> SO thinks that they are feeling lonely, and reaching out to those that once
> loved them.  Sort of makes sense to me, but they are (all three of them)..
> the ones that originally wanted out of the marriages.  

Actually, that describes what's going on with my ex very well.

Casey
kato - 28 May 2005 19:40 GMT
> Not only have I run into my ex, but she waves in an effort to get me to
> talk for a while.  That's when I quickly bury myself in a group of
> friends.

I'm sure if you thought about it, you could think of a $300 place to bury
yourself instead.

sorry.... I have got to get out more.
Casey - 29 May 2005 05:12 GMT
kato said

> > Not only have I run into my ex, but she waves in an effort to get me to
> > talk for a while.  That's when I quickly bury myself in a group of
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> sorry.... I have got to get out more.

ROFL ... yeah, I think that might be a good idea.

I'll even give you some more ammo - I just spent the whole afternoon on
a boat hanging out with about a billion other people on boats in a very
popular shallow area that becomes one big party on days like this.

The friend's boat we were tied up to just happened to have a number of
young women on board - this guy usually manages to do that.  Somehow at
one point, all the women were temporarily on the friend's boat and all
the guys were on ours.  We began to overhear 3 of the women were
discussing their breast implants and the guy talk suddenly stopped.  
They had our complete attention when they began to massage each other
to compare the "squeezability" of their implants.

That was shortly after the "Girls Gone Wild" boat floated through while
offering t-shirts to any woman willing to pull her top down.

All in all, it was a very nice day.

Okay - does that convince you to get out more?

Casey
kato - 29 May 2005 05:44 GMT
> kato said
> >
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Okay - does that convince you to get out more?

Yep it does. I did see a naked mannequin in a store window today, and I
think it was female....so I'm catching up.
DrLith - 29 May 2005 14:27 GMT
> Yep it does. I did see a naked mannequin in a store window today, and I
> think it was female....so I'm catching up.

Kinda answers the "real or fake" question from the git-go, doesn't it?
Casey - 29 May 2005 15:56 GMT
kato said
> "Casey" <cclremovethispart@cox.net> wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> Yep it does. I did see a naked mannequin in a store window today, and I
> think it was female....so I'm catching up.

Got any pictures?

Casey
YooperBoyka - 29 May 2005 08:06 GMT
> kato said
>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Okay - does that convince you to get out more?

I dunno 'bout him,...but I'm beginning to think I could live without snow on
Christmas.
Casey - 29 May 2005 16:07 GMT
YooperBoyka said
> "Casey" wrote

> > That was shortly after the "Girls Gone Wild" boat floated through while
> > offering t-shirts to any woman willing to pull her top down.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I dunno 'bout him,...but I'm beginning to think I could live without snow on
> Christmas.

The beach sand is very white if that helps any.

Casey
John Riggs - 29 May 2005 16:21 GMT
| YooperBoyka said
|
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
|
| Casey

   ....and it's a whole lot warmer too.
YooperBoyka - 30 May 2005 12:00 GMT
> | YooperBoyka said
> |
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>    ....and it's a whole lot warmer too.

Gauging by Casey's description, I don't think I'll be looking at the sand.
:^)
Nearl J Icarus - 29 May 2005 11:59 GMT
>Yeah, what the heck is going on with all this?
>Not only have I run into my ex, but she waves in an effort to get me to
>talk for a while.  That's when I quickly bury myself in a group of
>friends.

My ex has been trying to get me to come over for dinner on the weekends. She
didn't do that when we were married. She calls and wants to talk. I'm not much
of a conversationist and I'm not interested in telling her whats going on with
my life. I haven't told her I'm engaged. I figure she'll find out through the
kids. I did inform them that they have a future evil step-mother.
Casey - 29 May 2005 16:05 GMT
Nearl J Icarus said
> Casey said
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> my life. I haven't told her I'm engaged. I figure she'll find out through the
> kids. I did inform them that they have a future evil step-mother.

Three days after mine moved back to town recently, she called to say
she was "passing by" and wanted to stop and talk for a while (as in
chat) unless I didn't want her to.   I agreed ... that I didn't want
her to.

This was one in a string of efforts to get back into my life.  The
earlier ones were a bit more blunt - for example, calling and asking if
she could move back in.  The direct approach didn't work, so she went
to the indirect approach of trying to "be friends".  I can't do that
because I know where it will lead.

I could easily claim that it was a great feeling to get finally back at
her by saying no, but the honest truth is that all of this has just
been painful.  In some ways, she has finally found the last emotions
that can be dragged out of me about the whole divorce and all the
events leading up to it.  Years ago I was desperately trying to keep
her - now I'm having to push the same woman away.  

"The circle is now complete".

The only satisfying part of it is just being pleased with myself for
not allowing the door to open even a little bit.

Casey
John Riggs - 29 May 2005 16:15 GMT
   Good for you, Casey.

   Fortunately for me, only my second wife tried any of that. It does get
easier once you've resolved to shut them out.

| Nearl J Icarus said
| > Casey said
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
|
| Casey
saulgoode - 29 May 2005 16:29 GMT
Now that's an admirable show of emotional fortitude. I hope when the
time comes for me -- and it will -- that I can hold strong against that
temptation.

I think I'm about 6mos out from where Casey was 3yrs ago (just
guessing), having tried to beg her back and failed, and finally
deciding nuffs a nuff and letting go so I can butter someone else's
bread.

- Saul

> Good for you, Casey.
>
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> |
> | Casey
Casey - 29 May 2005 16:41 GMT
saulgoode said

> Now that's an admirable show of emotional fortitude. I hope when the
> time comes for me -- and it will -- that I can hold strong against that
> temptation.

It's one of those personal decisions that everyone has to make for
themselves.  The key is to make sure you don't allow yourself to be
talked into something that you know is not the right thing to do.

> I think I'm about 6mos out from where Casey was 3yrs ago (just
> guessing), having tried to beg her back and failed, and finally
> deciding nuffs a nuff and letting go so I can butter someone else's
> bread.

You're guess is pretty much correct, but it was about 4 years ago in my
case.  The point of no return had been reached, but I struggled with
all kinds of emotions while working on the divorce that was final about
3 1/2 years ago.

Hopefully it helps to hear stories from those of us who have been
through somewhat similar experiences and somehow managed to survive and
move on.  I know it helped me a lot starting about 4 1/2 years ago.

Casey
Nearl J Icarus - 30 May 2005 11:43 GMT
>It's one of those personal decisions that everyone has to make for
>themselves.  The key is to make sure you don't allow yourself to be
>talked into something that you know is not the right thing to do.

And have to figure out if anything has changed. If nothing has changed then
all you're in for is a complete repeat. That was the thing I realized in the
aftermath of the last time she wanted a separation. The old patterns went
right back into place. My mother mentioned that if I could her to dance like
she did me, I'd have it made. It was just a one way street.
rj - 29 May 2005 16:29 GMT
(snip)

>events leading up to it.  Years ago I was desperately trying to keep
>her - now I'm having to push the same woman away.  
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Casey

Y'know, Casey...  I cannot imagine how difficult this must be for you.
But based on all that you've said the course you're following is
probably the best one.

I've never had to deal with such a situation...  When my ex and I
split, the acrimony and the sense of betrayal was so intense that
there was never any impulse (at least on my part) to try to get back
together.  She was hurting me, she was hurting our children, and she
was even hurting herself.  And I hated every part of it and I hated
her for what she was doing both to me and to our children.  

Some part of me knew that *any* attempt to get back together with the
woman would be a horrendous mistake.  And, thank God, she never tried.
If she had tried, I might have been tempted... "for the children's
sake".

rj
Casey - 29 May 2005 16:46 GMT
rj said

> (snip)
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> But based on all that you've said the course you're following is
> probably the best one.

Fortunately, I do know that it is the best course so at least I don't
have to lay awake at night and wonder.  Still, it is painful to have to
deal with this now after everything else that has happened.

If this had happened right after the divorce, it would have been very
difficult to answer that question to myself.  I think it would have
been a terrible mistake to have gotten back together even back then,
but I honestly can't say what I would have done.

Casey
BP - 29 May 2005 19:33 GMT
>Three days after mine moved back to town recently, she called to say
>she was "passing by" and wanted to stop and talk for a while (as in
>chat) unless I didn't want her to.   I agreed ... that I didn't want
>her to.
<snip>
>The only satisfying part of it is just being pleased with myself for
>not allowing the door to open even a little bit.

Have you actually spelled it out to her, as in "We are divorced. It
was a very painful process for me. I do not want to be your friend or
have any social contact with you, other than the minimum communication
regarding our son." She knows how you feel, yet keeps bugging you
anyway?

Hang in there.

BP
Casey - 29 May 2005 21:34 GMT
BP said
> >Three days after mine moved back to town recently, she called to say
> >she was "passing by" and wanted to stop and talk for a while (as in
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> regarding our son." She knows how you feel, yet keeps bugging you
> anyway?

Yep, you pretty much described it.   The phone calls have stopped
finally though.

Casey
Nearl J Icarus - 30 May 2005 11:52 GMT
>Have you actually spelled it out to her, as in "We are divorced. It
>was a very painful process for me. I do not want to be your friend or
>have any social contact with you, other than the minimum communication

That approach wouldn't work with my ex. The pain she's dishing out now is
justified by all the pain you dished out. (that it takes two people to fight
is immaterial). So you would have no right to feel that way. Been down that
road. I was hoping that she would be satisfied with her revenge before it made
me resentful. She wasn't.
Nearl J Icarus - 30 May 2005 11:36 GMT
>Three days after mine moved back to town recently, she called to say
>she was "passing by" and wanted to stop and talk for a while (as in
>chat) unless I didn't want her to.   I agreed ... that I didn't want
>her to.

That's what I like so much about caller-id. If my son isn't over there, I'm
not answering the phone. Well, mostly.
-Calliope- - 30 May 2005 13:00 GMT
> In article <RSkme.4955$%Z2.2462@lakeread08>, cclremovethispart@cox.net
> says...
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> That's what I like so much about caller-id. If my son isn't over
> there, I'm not answering the phone. Well, mostly.

Unless he calls my cell, I don't answer the phone for my ex.. and even
then I still mostly let it go to voice mail, unless I'm feeling
particuarly patient.
Signature

Cal~

calliope 123 at gmail dot com

DrLith - 26 May 2005 20:14 GMT
> Dr. Laura says a bf/gf should not even meet the kids until they are engaged
> to the parent.

Oh, *that's* a big improvement. (Testing a man's sarcasm sectors.)

"Hey, kiddos, meet your new step-mom! Of course, don't get too close to
her, 'cause she had no idea what she was getting into and we're going to
be divorced within 5 years!"
Barbara Didrichsen - 27 May 2005 00:21 GMT
>> Dr. Laura says a bf/gf should not even meet the kids until they are engaged
>> to the parent.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>her, 'cause she had no idea what she was getting into and we're going to
>be divorced within 5 years!"

Sounds like advice only an opinionated, never-been-divorced person
would hand out.  

As a divorced person with parents who divorced (albeit after I was an
adult),  this sounds like something out of Grimm's Fairy Tales.
Especially if I had young kids living at home -- some or all of the
time -- I'd sure want to have some degree of comfort that my
prospective partner and my kids would get along.

Since my 19-year old son is moving out in September (it's official -
he signed a lease!), not a big concern for me anymore.  On the off
chance that I ever have another relationship, we're getting to the
"should I still let him have a key to the house or not?" stage of our
lives ;-))

Barb
Casey - 27 May 2005 15:26 GMT
Barbara Didrichsen said

> As a divorced person with parents who divorced (albeit after I was an
> adult),  this sounds like something out of Grimm's Fairy Tales.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> "should I still let him have a key to the house or not?" stage of our
> lives ;-))

Of course you should still let him have a key ... as long as it doesn't
also fit the new deadbolt you use when you're home.  ;-)


Casey
m_eL - 27 May 2005 15:55 GMT
>> Since my 19-year old son is moving out in September (it's official -
>> he signed a lease!), not a big concern for me anymore.  On the off
>> chance that I ever have another relationship, we're getting to the
>> "should I still let him have a key to the house or not?" stage of our
>> lives ;-))

My SS and SD have keys but if they don't knock before coming in they just
might be sorry.  I wouldn't even walk into my parents home now without
knocking and being let in, unless arranged in advance or an emergency.
I have the key to my ex's house but would never enter without permission.

Congrats on your son's upcoming independence!!!
Nearl J Icarus - 28 May 2005 11:42 GMT
>might be sorry.  I wouldn't even walk into my parents home now without
>knocking and being let in, unless arranged in advance or an emergency.

Other than my own, my parents homes were the only ones I'd walk in without
knocking. My Dad lived with one of his brothers. My uncle could see who came
in first and he'd tell Dad who it was. I was either the "#2 son" or "the
Arab." He said that "Arab" meant "wanderer."

My grandmother used to get a little annoyed with me because I'd always knock.
So I started saying "knock, knock" when I'd walk through the door. I 'knocked'
and she didn't have to answer the door. She lived a block away and I was over
there all the time. I'd head for the cookie jar first. (-8
Rog' - 27 May 2005 16:26 GMT
> Barbara Didrichsen said
>> Since my 19-year old son is moving out in September (it's official
>> - he signed a lease!), not a big concern for me anymore.  On the
>> off chance that I ever have another relationship, we're getting to
>> the "should I still let him have a key to the house or not?" stage of
>> our lives ;-))

Casey:
> Of course you should still let him have a key ... as long as it
> doesn't also fit the new deadbolt you use when you're home.  ;-)

Agreed.  We have keys to a neighbor's house and I have a key to
my former in-law's house, but only for use in an emergency.  =R=
Nearl J Icarus - 27 May 2005 10:38 GMT
>Let me give you my experience as a kid of divorced parents. Parents divorced
>when I was 5. I didn't mind meeting her new boyfriends (which started within
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>or more years, then break up. The break up was harder for me each time, and I
>eventually learned that no relationship is permanent.

I don't think I would have ever tolerated a step-father. My parents separated
when I was 5 and there was only one guy that she dated that I actually liked.
My first lesson on life is that when they want to leave, they're gone. That
wasn't from my mother dating. That was when my mother walked out on Dad.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.