X having gf stay over
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Do - 25 May 2005 01:13 GMT Anyone know anything about My X [ or anyone's X for that matter ] having his gf stay over the night while the kids are in the house ?
I am in Ct.
When she figures out that he is what he is, she will leave opening the space for another gf to move on in.She is mothering my children and I resent that.She has a home of her own but often stays the night in bed with my X and the kids are home. Ty in advance. Doreen
My Own Doppelganger - 25 May 2005 01:47 GMT You might want to talk to you lawyer - get a mod to your decree. My ex and I had a clause where neither one of us can have a member of the opposite sex stay overnight...partially due to the fact that our kids are very young.
Not a cool sitch'... it can be very damaging to the kids.
>Anyone know anything about My X [ or anyone's X for that matter ] having his >gf stay over the night while the kids are in the house ? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >Ty in advance. >Doreen -------- In a cold world you need your friends to keep you warm.
The Dave© - 25 May 2005 03:21 GMT > You might want to talk to you lawyer - get a mod to your decree. My > ex and I had a clause where neither one of us can have a member of the > opposite sex stay overnight...partially due to the fact that our kids > are very young. What if you or your ex wants to get remarried?
 Signature Dave says... fire Dave Hudgens
longshot - 25 May 2005 03:38 GMT > What if you or your ex wants to get remarried? exactly what I was thinking...
when you get divorced you give up all rights to nag & bitch, you get his money & you have to leave him alone now. Rob
Casey - 25 May 2005 04:07 GMT The Dave© said
> > You might want to talk to you lawyer - get a mod to your decree. My > > ex and I had a clause where neither one of us can have a member of the > > opposite sex stay overnight...partially due to the fact that our kids > > are very young. > > What if you or your ex wants to get remarried? I guess it's okay as long as the new spouse doesn't spend the night.
Casey
melned - 25 May 2005 16:09 GMT > What if you or your ex wants to get remarried? Then wait till after the wedding --IMHO. I practice this; my ex. does not. I hope to be setting a better example for my kids ... time will tell.
DrLith - 25 May 2005 19:10 GMT >>What if you or your ex wants to get remarried? > > Then wait till after the wedding --IMHO. I practice this; my ex. does > not. I hope to be setting a better example for my kids ... time will > tell. I will encourage my kids to "try before you buy" when their time comes, and this is the example I have set for them. YMMV.
Casey - 25 May 2005 19:48 GMT DrLith said
> >>What if you or your ex wants to get remarried? > > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > I will encourage my kids to "try before you buy" when their time comes, > and this is the example I have set for them. YMMV. Ditto for me.
Casey
Rog' - 25 May 2005 20:02 GMT > I will encourage my kids to "try before you buy" when their > time comes, and this is the example I have set for them. YMMV. Humor: A woman will spend thousands of dollars putting her wedding together -- buying the dress, sending out invitations, arranging the reception, but after her first wedding night, she'll roll over, look at her new husband and think to herself: "Damn, I could'a bought a house instead."
My ex's grandmother was not a forward thinker, but she did have this one gem that she told my ex, before we married: "You really don't know someone, until you've shared a bed and seen what they look like first thing in the morning." =R=
m_eL - 25 May 2005 20:56 GMT >Humor: A woman will spend thousands of dollars putting her >wedding together -- buying the dress, sending out invitations, >arranging the reception, but after her first wedding night, she'll >roll over, look at her new husband and think to herself: "Damn, >I could'a bought a house instead." More humor: (although true, actually)
It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife and $100 to adopt a dog from the animal shelter.
:-) longshot - 25 May 2005 21:09 GMT > It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife Ooooohhhhhh, I bet it cost him a hell of a lot more than that. :o)
m_eL - 25 May 2005 21:19 GMT >> It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife > >Ooooohhhhhh, I bet it cost him a hell of a lot more than that. :o) Oh, but i'm worth it... i make sure of that... ;-)
Rog' - 25 May 2005 21:41 GMT >>> It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife >>Ooooohhhhhh, I bet it cost him a hell of a lot more than that. :o) > Oh, but i'm worth it... i make sure of that... ;-) I'm sure that you are worth your weight in gold... as you have been to this NG! =R=
m_eL - 26 May 2005 00:04 GMT >>>> It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife >>>Ooooohhhhhh, I bet it cost him a hell of a lot more than that. :o) >> Oh, but i'm worth it... i make sure of that... ;-) > >I'm sure that you are worth your weight in gold... as you have >been to this NG! =R= Roger, Thank you. dunno what else to say. like one of those emotional-nakedness moments when i would usually make a sex-joke but i won't. (and i didn't reject your compliment, see, that's progress on my journey towards healthy self-esteem)
DrLith - 26 May 2005 01:20 GMT > >>> It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife > >>Ooooohhhhhh, I bet it cost him a hell of a lot more than that. :o) > > Oh, but i'm worth it... i make sure of that... ;-) > > I'm sure that you are worth your weight in gold... as you have > been to this NG! =R= You only say that 'cause you know she's so slender!
Rog' - 25 May 2005 21:38 GMT >> It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife > > Ooooohhhhhh, I bet it cost him a hell of a lot more than that. :o) ... Yep, he's still paying a heavy price for it, too! :-) =R=
Joe St. Lucas - 26 May 2005 05:10 GMT >>It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife and $100 to adopt a dog from the >>animal shelter. >Ooooohhhhhh, I bet it cost him a hell of a lot more than that. :o) Maybe, but I don't have sex with the dog.
m_eL - 26 May 2005 05:34 GMT >>>It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife and $100 to adopt a dog from the >>>animal shelter. >>Ooooohhhhhh, I bet it cost him a hell of a lot more than that. :o) > >Maybe, but I don't have sex with the dog. maybe doggie-style though....
m_eL - 26 May 2005 05:36 GMT >maybe doggie-style though.... ooops, should clarify, not with the DOG...
Rog' - 26 May 2005 09:18 GMT >>>It cost my husband $50 to make me his wife >>>and $100 to adopt a dog from the animal shelter. >>Ooooohhhhhh, I bet it cost him a hell of a lot more than that. :o) > Maybe, but I don't have sex with the dog. But having paid more for the dog...
My Own Doppelganger - 26 May 2005 00:44 GMT That's cool - as long as the SO (read non-spouse) doesn't spend the night while the kids are under the same roof.
>> You might want to talk to you lawyer - get a mod to your decree. My >> ex and I had a clause where neither one of us can have a member of the >> opposite sex stay overnight...partially due to the fact that our kids >> are very young. > >What if you or your ex wants to get remarried? -------- In a cold world you need your friends to keep you warm.
The Dave© - 26 May 2005 17:14 GMT > My Own Doppelganger wrote: > That's cool - as long as the SO (read non-spouse) doesn't spend the > night while the kids are under the same roof. Just curious, but exactly *why* is that such a big deal?
 Signature Dave says... Fire Dave Hudgens
My Own Doppelganger - 27 May 2005 02:56 GMT For kids that age (6 & 3) it will confuse the hell out of them. Not that this is the case with my ex, but all the old school psych babble will tell ya that a mom who sleeps around in front (not literally) of their kids will create some f* up kids.
>> My Own Doppelganger wrote: >> That's cool - as long as the SO (read non-spouse) doesn't spend the >> night while the kids are under the same roof. > >Just curious, but exactly *why* is that such a big deal? -------- In a cold world you need your friends to keep you warm.
The Dave© - 26 May 2005 17:15 GMT > My Own Doppelganger wrote: > That's cool - as long as the SO (read non-spouse) doesn't spend the > night while the kids are under the same roof. Just curious, but exactly *why* is that such a big deal?
 Signature Dave says... Fire Dave Hudgens
Nearl J Icarus - 27 May 2005 10:45 GMT >> My Own Doppelganger wrote: >> That's cool - as long as the SO (read non-spouse) doesn't spend the >> night while the kids are under the same roof. > >Just curious, but exactly *why* is that such a big deal? My ex's boyfriends thought they could act as if they were the father. My kids were pretty quick to tell them otherwise. Sometimes they weren't very civil about it (my kids, that is).
Casey - 25 May 2005 04:01 GMT My Own Doppelganger said
> You might want to talk to you lawyer - get a mod to your decree. My > ex and I had a clause where neither one of us can have a member of the > opposite sex stay overnight...partially due to the fact that our kids > are very young. At some point one or both of you will consider that to be an unreasonable restraint. What if you date someone for months?
Casey
My Own Doppelganger - 26 May 2005 00:45 GMT Stay overnight while the kids are under the same roof as the SO.
>My Own Doppelganger said > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >Casey -------- In a cold world you need your friends to keep you warm.
Claim Guy - 25 May 2005 03:05 GMT > Anyone know anything about My X [ or anyone's X for that matter ] having his > gf stay over the night while the kids are in the house ? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Ty in advance. > Doreen No, I have no personal knowledge of anyone sleeping with your ex, cause I don't know, or care, who the hell any of you are.
What do you expect us to say?
Learn to live with this or go nuts.
Pretty much everyone who is divorced with kids has to face up to another parental figure becoming involved in their children's lives. You won't be any different.You can resent it all you like, but so what? You are the one who will get eaten up from the inside.
And just because you can't stand him doesn't mean that another woman won't think he is the most wonderful man on earth. I bet he is saying some pretty nasty stuff about you and you probably think you are just fine and worthy of love.
So do you plan on having just one more relationship for the rest of your life? Straight from this one to another lifelong commitment?
Your pain and anger is driving your thought processes. It's normal, but you have to realize it is happening in order to be able to work through it.
How long have you been apart?
DrLith - 25 May 2005 04:08 GMT > > Anyone know anything about My X [ or anyone's X for that matter ] having > his [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Learn to live with this or go nuts. Seconded. Unless you already have something written into your divorce decree, you can't do anything about it. Complaining about it will only make you look bitter and jealous. They will then snicker about you behind their back and proceed to undermine you in every conceivable way, since after all, you are just a bitter, jealous ex and not a cooperative co-parent. What you call "mothering" your children is likely nothing more than treating them kindly and taking an interest in them. You would probably not be resentful if it were a teacher or babysitter or some other such figure doing the same things.
DrLith, wishes she could farm out mothering duty more often
Casey - 25 May 2005 04:11 GMT DrLith said
> What you > call "mothering" your children is likely nothing more than treating them > kindly and taking an interest in them. Exactly ... would the OP be happier if the g/f treated the kids like dirt instead?
Casey
John Riggs - 25 May 2005 05:45 GMT | > > Anyone know anything about My X [ or anyone's X for that matter ] having | > his [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] | | DrLith, wishes she could farm out mothering duty more often I have to agree.
Do - 25 May 2005 14:53 GMT Calm down mean man.
Let him remarry, i will personally buy the flowers for the wedding.
I am trying to get the kids to my house more often and if he can't sleep with a gf when the kids are in the house, that will get them to my house. Do
> > Anyone know anything about My X [ or anyone's X for that matter ] having > his [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > How long have you been apart? Joe St. Lucas - 25 May 2005 15:26 GMT >I am trying to get the kids to my house more often and if he can't sleep >with a gf when the kids are in the house, that will get them to my house. >Do If there's nothing in your divorce decree that specifies "no overnight guests" then there;s nothing you can do w/o going back to court. I'd have thought he'd want the kids gone so they wouldn't interrupt the two of them, or maybe he's just playing the "i have the kids and you can't have them on my nights" thing.
John Riggs - 25 May 2005 16:47 GMT You know, there is absolutely no law forbidding him from having a girlfriend. If he lets you have the kids more often, it is probably because he's trying to be a nice guy. Leave it lay and get on with your life. The only one you will hurt with this behavior, is yourself. Get over it!
| Calm down mean man. | [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] | > | > How long have you been apart? Do - 25 May 2005 21:56 GMT What i haven't mentioned is that he has poisoned the kids against me and they do not spend the nights here that they are suppose to.
I figure this may be a way to get them back a bit more.
I am all in favor of him having a gf. let him leave me alone and spend time with her.
Why can't you all understand that some people are evil and hurt others? My attorney typed up over 75+ examples of him being in contempt of court. Do, plz believe me.
> You know, there is absolutely no law forbidding him from having a > girlfriend. [quoted text clipped - 61 lines] > | > > | > How long have you been apart? Claim Guy - 25 May 2005 23:06 GMT > What i haven't mentioned is that he has poisoned the kids against me and > they do not spend the nights here that they are suppose to. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > attorney typed up over 75+ examples of him being in contempt of court. > Do, plz believe me. Three sides to every story - and the truth is rarely told in one-sided newsgroup posts.
If they don't spend the nights they are supposed to, he is in violation of a court order, or agreement and you should address that.
Legal note for you - "contempt of court" is a legal ruling made by the court. Your attorney is alleging 75 incidents that he feels could be grounds for contempt - and I bet he got all 75 examples from you, so we are back to the first issue.
If your attorney has over 75 examples of contempt and you can;t get the kids when you are supposed to, you need another attorney.
You shouldn't try and use the "poisoning" argument as justification for manipulation of your ex's personal life. Deal with the agreements or orders and quit trying to play the angles.
-Calliope- - 26 May 2005 05:28 GMT > What i haven't mentioned is that he has poisoned the kids against me > and they do not spend the nights here that they are suppose to. Do, how old are your children again? (I'm sorry, it's been a while since you've posted and I've forgotten.)
I think you are going about this situation all wrong, it comes across (at least in a textual context, as manipulative).. and if he's actively poisoning them against you, you're only giving him new ammunition to achieve that poisoning, IMO.
> I figure this may be a way to get them back a bit more. How? If they are refusing to come now, even with a court order, what makes you think this one would be different?
> I am all in favor of him having a gf. let him leave me alone and spend > time with her. > > Why can't you all understand that some people are evil and hurt > others? My attorney typed up over 75+ examples of him being in > contempt of court. Do, plz believe me. Okay, if there are over 75 examples of his not following the court orders, why isn't your attorney doing anything about that? What is he doing with these examples. I would be thoroughly annoyed if he was just sitting on them.
As far as the ex having someone sleep over, unless it was written in the original agreement or court order, I doubt you'll be able to go anywhere with that one.
It sucks, if the parent is dragging new people into their lives consistently, but if it is someone they are making a life with, there isn't probably going to be major harm, particularly if the person is trying to be a decent adult in their lives. (This is a very difficult one to deal sometimes *believe* me, I know!) It is far, far better to have a decent person involved with your ex than a beyotch.. seriously!
My ex is married to a nasty old harridan, who has pretty much eroded the realtionship the children have with their dad, sadly. (Yes, I know it is his fault for allowing it, but I do believe she orchestrated their estrangement intentionally and quite methodically. But hey.. DS has only been home from college for just under a week...who cares if he doesn't bother calling back to even talk to the kid?.-sorry mini-vent)
I can only imagine how difficult it must be to have kids that refuse to come when they're scheduled to be in your custody. It must be incredibly painul. But trying to manipulate them into coming will probably only backfire in the long run.
As for you, I'm left wondering. Are you seeing a counselor to help you deal with this? I've the impression you could probably use someone talk with about this. I know I would, if I were in your shoes.
Take care.
 Signature Cal~
calliope 123 at gmail dot com
John Riggs - 26 May 2005 05:33 GMT Actually, reading your words, it sounds more like you are doing it to yourself. You are your own worst enemy right now. He doesn't have to do a thing, and kids aren't that dumb.
| What i haven't mentioned is that he has poisoned the kids against me and | they do not spend the nights here that they are suppose to. [quoted text clipped - 83 lines] | > | > | > | > How long have you been apart? DrLith - 25 May 2005 19:10 GMT > Calm down mean man. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > with a gf when the kids are in the house, that will get them to my house. > Do A bit manipulative...but...if that's the main issue, why not get brownie points by suggesting you'd be happy to have the kids more often so he can have some "private time" with his honey?
It is possible that won't work, but forbidding him to have his gf sleep over is not only guaranteed not to work, but may well backfire for the reasons I mentioned earlier.
Claim Guy - 25 May 2005 23:01 GMT > Calm down mean man. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > with a gf when the kids are in the house, that will get them to my house. > Do Oh you calm down - papering over lady.
You're talking out of both sides of your mouth.
A tad manipulative, aren't we?
Casey - 25 May 2005 04:06 GMT Do said
> Anyone know anything about My X [ or anyone's X for that matter ] having his > gf stay over the night while the kids are in the house ? I'd be more concerned about the g/f if she were mistreating the kids or behaving poorly in front of them. It would be awful if he were bringing home a different woman every night. Having a steady g/f that quietly spends the night sometimes isn't the end of the world.
> When she figures out that he is what he is, she will leave opening the space > for another gf to move on in.She is mothering my children and I resent > that.She has a home of her own but often stays the night in bed with my X > and the kids are home. > Ty in advance. Not much you can do about it ... after all, it is his life.
Casey
m_eL - 25 May 2005 04:30 GMT >Do said > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > >Not much you can do about it ... after all, it is his life. OP, i recall others here in the past being really upset about the ex's new SO being around the kids and stuff. i was practically the devil him/herself when i suggested an ex might actually marry the new lover! i acknowledge the fact that it must feel terribly frustrating and awkward, but like everybody said here, you'll have to accept it whether you like it or not. Also from past ASD experience, you'll probably feel angry and want to strike out at those of us telling you that you have to accept it. I hope the kids will be ok and that you'll find peace in your own life as well. Vent here all you need to, hope it helps.
ed_spain - 25 May 2005 10:25 GMT Hi Do,
My STBX, who did her homework very well before making what _I_ consider a horrible decision, said that after we get over the inital breakup, we will still have to go through hell at least twice more: once for the actual divorce, and once when the ex gets a SO in their life.
Of course, having a stream of GFs through his life, all involved in the kids life, is not going to be the best for them. However, morally, I would not call what your ex is doing RIGHT NOW "mistreating" the kids, and I guess a court won't see it that way, either. I can understand your resentment, but my advice would be to keep it to yourself. If you're anything like me, you'll feel A LOT of resentment about A LOT of things, but you have to keep a handle on your emotions and concentrate on pragmatically doing the best for your kids.
What's the saying about god giving me the strength to change the things that I can, to ability to let go of the things that I can't change, and the wisdom to tell the difference? I think this is one of those "let it go" type of cases.
Good luck, Do, and I hope I can listen to my own advice when my ex has someone staying over night with her ;-> Hmmm, just typing that really got my emotions going!!!!
Ed
Rog' - 25 May 2005 11:53 GMT > Hi Do, <snip> > Of course, having a stream of GFs through his life, all involved [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > keep a handle on your emotions and concentrate on pragmatically > doing the best for your kids. <snip> I agree. It may have to be ordered, but for an insightful (albeit Holllywood) look at this issue, I highly recommend that folks find or rent a 1979 movie with Dustin Hoffman and Meryl Streep called, "Kramer vs. Kramer." The courtroom fight in which the ex-wife raises the issue is extremely intense. [5 Oscars, incl. Best Picture, Actor, Actress] =R=
Dixie - 25 May 2005 20:46 GMT > Anyone know anything about My X [ or anyone's X for that matter ] having his > gf stay over the night while the kids are in the house ? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Ty in advance. > Doreen Both my ex and I had the morality clause in our divorce agreement (neither he nor I could have someone over night while the kids were present). So far, no problems. He has a gf but I'm bf-free and liking it alot. Anyway, we both feel like we should make appearances in front of the kids even if we do other things while they are away.
So, unless you have such an agreement, there's really not much you can do. Just don't quiz your kids over it and put them on the spot. My $0.02 worth.
WhansaMi - 25 May 2005 23:28 GMT > Both my ex and I had the morality clause in our divorce agreement > (neither he nor I could have someone over night while the kids were > present). So far, no problems. He has a gf but I'm bf-free and liking > it alot. Anyway, we both feel like we should make appearances in front > of the kids even if we do other things while they are away. Dixie, this is curious to me.
I lived with my DH before we got married, with my kids from a former marriage. I don't believe it is morally wrong for adults in a committed, monogamous marriage to have sex, assuming it is honest and responsible. I would guess, given that, I would feel the opposite way if I believed it was wrong --- I wouldn't let them see it, because I wouldn't do it.
My DH's ex lived with her boyfriend (with whom she had an extramarital affair), but told the children it was "okay, because he slept beside the bed on the floor". :-p
I guess what I don't understand is... if someone really believes it is wrong, why would they do it? I don't do things I believe are morally wrong. And, if they don't believe it is wrong, why would they hide it?
Sheila
Bill in Co. - 25 May 2005 23:45 GMT >> Both my ex and I had the morality clause in our divorce agreement >> (neither he nor I could have someone over night while the kids were [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > I guess what I don't understand is... if someone really believes it is > wrong, why would they do it? I don't do things I believe are morally wrong. Then you're a notable exception - in this world. I figure we have a handful or two left.
Rog' - 26 May 2005 00:55 GMT > I guess what I don't understand is... if someone really believes > it is wrong, why would they do it? I don't do things I believe > are morally wrong. And, if they don't believe it is wrong, why > would they hide it? Because adults like to engage in hypocrisy. They don't want kids thinking that its okay, even if they think its okay. So, they only have hanky-panky when the kids are away, as if any kid with over the age of 12 with ears who doesn't know what's really going on.
While the adults are sneaking around, the kids are probably out smoking pot and downloading porn off the net. Nothing ever changes. When I was 16, I walked in on my dad and soon-2-B stepmother. At least I got to peak at their copy of "Joy of Sex" when they were out of the house. :-) =R=
m_eL - 26 May 2005 01:24 GMT >> I guess what I don't understand is... if someone really believes >> it is wrong, why would they do it? I don't do things I believe [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >thinking that its okay, even if they think its okay. So, they only >have hanky-panky when the kids are away, I think it's hurtful to kids, to a spouse, and even to one's SELF when people feel they need to "hide" something. I've tried to always be very open with my kids about things like sex, drugs, etc. so that they don't feel they have to *hide* things from me and can even ask for advice if they want to. And they have. I don't hide anything from my spouse, no matter how personal or "embarassing" it might be, becuz i believe secrets and deceptions damage a marriage. I'd rather know about something even if it's somewhat uncomfortable, than to later find out something was kept from me. My parents were of the "do as i say, not as i do" thing and thus i found myself feeling the need to hide things from them.
If single parents have SO's and they don't want their kids to know they sleep with the SO, then don't sleep with the SO. It's just better not to have to lie or deceive anyone. IMO.
Bill in Co. - 26 May 2005 02:06 GMT >> I guess what I don't understand is... if someone really believes >> it is wrong, why would they do it? I don't do things I believe >> are morally wrong. And, if they don't believe it is wrong, why >> would they hide it? > > Because adults like to engage in hypocrisy. SOME adults engage in hypocrisy. Speak for yourself, bubba!
kato - 26 May 2005 02:37 GMT > When I was 16, I walked in on my dad and soon-2-B > stepmother. At least I got to peak at their copy of "Joy of Sex" > when they were out of the house. :-) =R= Talking about parents having sex is just gross..my parents never, ever had sex......ever!
m_eL - 26 May 2005 03:15 GMT >> When I was 16, I walked in on my dad and soon-2-B >> stepmother. At least I got to peak at their copy of "Joy of Sex" >> when they were out of the house. :-) =R= > >Talking about parents having sex is just gross..my parents never, ever had >sex......ever! neither did mine!!!! ggrrrooossssssss!!! ewwww!!!! icky! (OTOH, i feel warm and cozy thinking about the fact i was conceived out of love as opposed to bought at the "baby store")
I think they just don't need to see/hear it happening, that's traumatic to a kid.
Rog' - 26 May 2005 04:21 GMT kato:
>>Talking about parents having sex is just gross..my parents >>never, ever had sex......ever! [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > conceived out of love as opposed to bought at the "baby > store") Huh? It was my understanding that we were brought from a distant land by storks, carried by their beaks... but I have to admit to wondering why a stork would do that. =R=
DrLith - 26 May 2005 04:33 GMT > kato: > >>Talking about parents having sex is just gross..my parents [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > distant land by storks, carried by their beaks... but I have to > admit to wondering why a stork would do that. =R= Would go a long way toward 'splainin' why yer legs are so scrawny.
DrLith, brought from a distant land by hippos
WhansaMi - 26 May 2005 11:39 GMT > >> When I was 16, I walked in on my dad and soon-2-B > >> stepmother. At least I got to peak at their copy of "Joy of Sex" [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > I think they just don't need to see/hear it happening, that's traumatic to a > kid. I agree. I have always taken precautions to ensure that didn't happen -- locking doors, playing the "Very, very quiet game" when they are in the house, etc.
But, I see that as different than this.
Sheila
John Riggs - 26 May 2005 04:20 GMT Mine either, which in retrospect would make all 5 of us immaculate conceptions. Hmmmm....might account the names.
| > When I was 16, I walked in on my dad and soon-2-B | > stepmother. At least I got to peak at their copy of "Joy of Sex" | > when they were out of the house. :-) =R= | | Talking about parents having sex is just gross..my parents never, ever had | sex......ever! DrLith - 26 May 2005 02:22 GMT > I guess what I don't understand is... if someone really believes it is > wrong, why would they do it? I don't do things I believe are morally wrong. > And, if they don't believe it is wrong, why would they hide it? I'll let Dixie answer for herself, but I think that in part it relates to the similar discussion on Another Newsgroup. In that one, we discussed to what lengths different couples go to shield their sex lives in general from their kids, even if they're married and all living under one roof. (If I recall, you were among the more "private" couples!) I think there are many things that adults do or have done that they think are morally ok but that they not only don't want their kids to see. Not only in a literal sense of directly witnessing, but in the broader sense of not wanting the kids to even know they engage in.
WhansaMi - 26 May 2005 03:03 GMT > > I guess what I don't understand is... if someone really believes it is > > wrong, why would they do it? I don't do things I believe are morally [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > directly witnessing, but in the broader sense of not wanting the kids to > even know they engage in. Yes, I was among the more "private" group. :-)
But, I don't see that it is the same at all. What I object to is kids having the opportunity to witness sex between any adults -- not just parents.
If I follow your thinking above, it seems to me that these folks would also not live together even when married.
It doesn't make any sense to me.
Sheila
DrLith - 26 May 2005 04:46 GMT > > > I guess what I don't understand is... if someone really believes it is > > > wrong, why would they do it? I don't do things I believe are morally [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > If I follow your thinking above, it seems to me that these folks would also > not live together even when married. I'm saying that some people perhaps include "sex between unmarried partners" (and not "sex" period, which seems to be how you are reading it) in that range of things that they consider morally ok but that they don't want their kids to know they do. I might compare it to certain "non-vanilla" sex practices, for example. Maybe you enjoy a little S&M or D&S. You think this is morally ok. But you don't just want your kids not to *see* it. You don't want them to have the faintest inkling that you do it. If they asked you, you might even say you don't do it.
> It doesn't make any sense to me. Well, it's not a totally bullet-proof logic (and it's not a position I hold myself!) And I'll also agree that no matter how you slice it, there's a certain level of hypocracy involved.
DrLith, reprises her "we all have our moments of hypocracy. Mine is yelling at my kids to be quiet" speech
-Calliope- - 26 May 2005 05:04 GMT > I'm saying that some people perhaps include "sex between unmarried > partners" (and not "sex" period, which seems to be how you are reading [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > faintest inkling that you do it. If they asked you, you might even say > you don't do it. Sheesh... all three groups are now getting into the whole parents/sex talk! Is there something in the water, these days? lol.
 Signature Cal~
calliope 123 at gmail dot com
WhansaMi - 26 May 2005 11:36 GMT > > > > I guess what I don't understand is... if someone really believes it is > > > > wrong, why would they do it? I don't do things I believe are morally [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > want them to have the faintest inkling that you do it. If they asked you, > you might even say you don't do it. Well, you may not have noticed, but I didn't respond to that portion of the thread, because that didn't make sense to me either! :-O
Sheila
Barbara Sz. - 25 May 2005 22:02 GMT My son was 14 when we divorced, and a mere 4 months after it was final, my ex started dating a 14-year younger woman who used to babysit our son when she was a teenager. When he informed me some 6 months later that they intended to marry another 10 months from that, he agreed with my request that she not sleep in the house when our son was there. He gave his word.
About 10 weeks before the wedding, the woman's mother sold the house that they had been sharing. My ex approached me with the "only" solution to her lack of housing, that she move in with him and our son. Into the house I still legally co-owned. I, of course, reminded him of his promise, suggested more than 1/2 a dozen alternatives to her living in the house in front of our son, including our son moving in with me for the 10 weeks.
I was rather vehement about my opinion on the subject, and after I had been so, I found out from our son that she had already been spending the night on occasion for about 2 weeks anyway. So I was trying to shut the barn door after the horse had gotten out, and made a big deal about something that had already happened.
Which is how my son viewed it. He even wrote us both a letter stating his opinion that he didn't see what the big deal was and he didn't really want to never sleep at his dad's house for the next 10 weeks. Had I known that it had already happened, I wouldn't have made such a big deal about it. I ended up having to "give in" for my son's sake.
The truth is, you don't really have any control over your ex's behavior any more than you want to let your ex have control over your behavior. You can try to negotiate more time at your place with the kids by "offering" to keep them when your ex has his gf over, as a favor if you will, to give them privacy and time to themselves. It certainly might work better than getting bent out of shape than getting pissy about the moral issue or expressing your resentment.
And, as far as your resentment of this woman mothering your children, I think you should be grateful that she is interested and willing to mother them and not ignore them or treat them worse than pets. The more people who love our children and take care of them and look after them, the better off they are, not worse.
As my son is pretty much already raised and has a perfectly competent mother, and his stepmother is only 15 years older than he is and hardly in a position to be much more than a "big sister" (which is how my son had thought of her since he was very small), I don't really have to worry about the issues you do. And, my ex did marry this girl, so there aren't revolving gfs to worry about.
You could try to have the decree altered to include a clause about SO sleepovers, but it would probably only make things worse between you and your ex. Which really isn't good for the kids, trust me on that one. Even with older kids.
I certainly wouldn't try the "kids have to stay with me when the gf is spending the night" route, I can guarantee you from experience, it doesn't work. Good luck! -- Barbara Sz.
A man - 26 May 2005 15:04 GMT On Tue, 24 May 2005 20:13:48 -0400 in article <waednWKjD9qjXg7fRVn- pg@comcast.com>, doglasser@comcast.net spoke thusly...
> Anyone know anything about My X [ or anyone's X for that matter ] having his > gf stay over the night while the kids are in the house ? [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > that.She has a home of her own but often stays the night in bed with my X > and the kids are home. Many people say that having a GF stay over while the kids are there is really bad form. In some states (Michigan) if a bg/gf moves in to the house, then the parent who got the house must pay the other parent his share of the equity. Psychologists say it's hard for the kids (especially younger ones) to meet these people, thinking they will be a new step-parent, only to have them gone after 3-6 months.
Dr. Laura says a bf/gf should not even meet the kids until they are engaged to the parent.
Let me give you my experience as a kid of divorced parents. Parents divorced when I was 5. I didn't mind meeting her new boyfriends (which started within a year). But it was hard to see them go if she had been dating them for 3 years, and they broke up. Because by then I had gotten to know them and I had fun with them. This happened about 3 times, when mom would date someone for 3 or more years, then break up. The break up was harder for me each time, and I eventually learned that no relationship is permanent.
 Signature Sig: Say no to fixed width HTML tables. They look terrible in most browsers.
Joe St. Lucas - 26 May 2005 15:26 GMT >Let me give you my experience as a kid of divorced parents. Parents divorced >when I was 5. I didn't mind meeting her new boyfriends (which started within [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >or more years, then break up. The break up was harder for me each time, and I >eventually learned that no relationship is permanent. Guess your mom was a person who couldn't commit to any relationship.
saulgoode - 26 May 2005 19:10 GMT > On Tue, 24 May 2005 20:13:48 -0400 in article <waednWKjD9qjXg7fRVn- > pg@comcast.com>, doglasser@comcast.net spoke thusly... [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > Dr. Laura says a bf/gf should not even meet the kids until they are engaged > to the parent. You'll want to meet the kids and see how the SO/kids interact well before you start planning a wedding, not to mention that Laura doesn't consider sole-custody situations and the inconvenience this rule would impose. This sounds like a penalty against divorced parents rather than good advice from an objective doctor.
On the original post, I second all the let-it-be opinions. You should set an example for the children yourself rather than hound the ex to be more like you. Eventually the children will choose their path. My opinion is it's not okay to have a sleep-over, given my son is only 4yo, and the one time a girl wound up there while I had the boy I made her sleep on the couch. I may change my tune one day.
If using the situation as legal leverage, then I'd say you're probably SOL -- nothing here points to anything harmful to the children, or even that unusual, and if you're not the primary custodian, which sounds like the case, then I'm shakin my head trying to figure out what you're after.
- Saul
Casey - 26 May 2005 21:41 GMT saulgoode said
> > Many people say that having a GF stay over while the kids are there is really > > bad form. In some states (Michigan) if a bg/gf moves in to the house, then [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > consider sole-custody situations and the inconvenience this rule would > impose. Yeah, it would be pretty hard for me to have any type of relationship without my son meeting the woman early on. Since he lives here full time, I can't exactly have a relaxing night at home watching a good DVD if he's excluded. Besides, if he and the prospect are not going to be compatible, I'd rather know it sooner than later.
> This sounds like a penalty against divorced parents rather than > good advice from an objective doctor. That doctor loves to give righteous-sounding advice.
In reality, everyone's situation is different and there are degrees of everything. It's not like I just randomly bring anyone over to the house for a while - I won't even consider dating anyone that I would not want my son to meet.
Casey
Barbara Sz. - 27 May 2005 04:09 GMT You could always hook up with one of your former babysitters and have the compatibility issue settled really early on. ;) I could say more, but you've all heard it before and are more than tired of it as I recall. :) -- Barbara Sz.
> saulgoode said > > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > if he's excluded. Besides, if he and the prospect are not going to be > compatible, I'd rather know it sooner than later. Casey - 27 May 2005 15:20 GMT Barbara Sz. said
> > saulgoode said > > > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > You could always hook up with one of your former babysitters and have > the compatibility issue settled really early on. ;) Oh, I could never do that ... my son never really had any babysitters worth considering.
> I could say more, > but you've all heard it before and are more than tired of it as I > recall. :) -- Barbara Sz. Oh, what the heck ... go ahead. You've earned the right!
Casey
Barbara Sz. - 28 May 2005 04:37 GMT Obviously you're a man of more discerning tastes than my ex then. But I figured that out pretty quickly after arriving here a couple of years ago, so of course it is obvious. :)
As for saying more, I don't really have anything more to say than what I've said a gazillion times before. Eventually, I suppose I'll get it out of my system... -- Barbara Sz.
Casey - 28 May 2005 04:46 GMT Barbara Sz. said
> Obviously you're a man of more discerning tastes than my ex then. That's right, I'm darned picky - not just any babysitter will do!
> But I > figured that out pretty quickly after arriving here a couple of years > ago, so of course it is obvious. :) Hey, that might be the nicest thing anyone has said to me today ... I think.
> As for saying more, I don't really have anything more to say than what > I've said a gazillion times before. Eventually, I suppose I'll get it > out of my system... -- Barbara Sz. Maybe, maybe not. Keep trying though until you do even if it takes a gazillion more times.
Talk about aggravated .... suddenly I'm running into my ex everywhere I go. I was invited to a big party tonight at a private residence. Drove up, parked at the first spot which was a few blocks away, and then walked right by my ex's vehicle parked on the street.
I turned around, walked back to my car, and left. This is getting old in a hurry.
Casey
Barbara Sz. - 28 May 2005 05:03 GMT I feel your pain, although I usually don't run into my ex anywhere, I usually know ahead of time when he's going to be somewhere I am. Like at my old church on June 5. My Chorale is singing both services there. I haven't been there when he and the wife have been in town since I left that church Jan 2003. And it's depressing enough going there when I know they're not going to be there, little alone when I'm thinking they will be there. And wouldn't you know it, my parents are out of town that weekend. Sigh.
Of course, there is the fact that I typically don't go anywhere or do anything, so it's unlikely that I'm going to run into my ex anywhere as I told him last August that he was no longer welcome behind the security gates to the parking lot nor across my threshold. I can go weeks and months without running into him.
Last weekend my son and I and friends of ours went to see "Revenge of the Sith" on Saturday morning and then out to lunch. The first place my friends suggested was a Mexican restaurant we've all frequented for years, but I don't go there anymore since last fall when The After-Wedding Party was held there. And, for some reason I keep fixating on the oncoming of June 15, what would have been my 20th wedding anniversary. To my detriment.
It doesn't help either that my colleague (who's spouse dumped her in a classic mid-life crisis move after 20 years of marriage -- and they had one of those oh-my-gosh-perfect-looking marriages -- not too long after I got dumped) has a new boyfriend. So apparently she's managed to move on, which, oddly enough, makes me angry. With her, with myself, with life in general.
Sorry, I guess I'm just too depressed and depressing. --Barbara Sz.
>Talk about aggravated .... suddenly I'm running into my ex everywhere I >go. I was invited to a big party tonight at a private residence. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >I turned around, walked back to my car, and left. This is getting old >in a hurry rj - 28 May 2005 05:13 GMT (snip)
>Talk about aggravated .... suddenly I'm running into my ex everywhere I >go. I was invited to a big party tonight at a private residence. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >Casey Bummer.
Maybe you ought to be proactive about building a new and different circle of acquaintances. Not suggesting that you abandon the old ones... but a new branch to your personal network might give you some parties to go to that don't include your ex. Just a thought...
rj
Casey - 28 May 2005 16:05 GMT rj said
> (snip) > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > ones... but a new branch to your personal network might give you some > parties to go to that don't include your ex. Just a thought... It's a good thought, but this is a very small town. There are only a few popular places to go and I was firmly established in one before she moved back to town and suddenly started appearing there. And yes, her friends who I know very well were very aware that I frequented there.
It's also a very intermingled social network of singles - basically one big branch. This was a big party that a lot of my friends (including one woman I'm somewhat interested in) were attending.
My social world has been suddenly invaded.
Casey
John Riggs - 28 May 2005 06:48 GMT My ex had a sudden urge to make my old hang outs her own.....didn't work too well for her. Friends, Club owners, bouncers, and various security people kept tossing her and her date out whenever they would even look my direction.I suspect if you just go about your business, she'll have the same results. It seems to work that way......and you are a peaceable, likable guy that don't cause no trouble.
| Barbara Sz. said | [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] | | Casey -Calliope- - 28 May 2005 15:32 GMT > Talk about aggravated .... suddenly I'm running into my ex everywhere I > go. I was invited to a big party tonight at a private residence. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > I turned around, walked back to my car, and left. This is getting old > in a hurry. Egads! My worst nightmare. I swear there's gotta be something in the air lately.
My ex called to offer a few things he didn't need, to help me fix up my house on Thursday. SO's ex wrote him a letter that was basically just '(ex)family chitchat'.. Weird.
 Signature Cal~
calliope 123 at gmail dot com
Casey - 28 May 2005 16:01 GMT -Calliope- said
> > Talk about aggravated .... suddenly I'm running into my ex everywhere I > > go. I was invited to a big party tonight at a private residence. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > house on Thursday. SO's ex wrote him a letter that was basically just > '(ex)family chitchat'.. Weird. Yeah, what the heck is going on with all this?
Not only have I run into my ex, but she waves in an effort to get me to talk for a while. That's when I quickly bury myself in a group of friends.
Casey
-Calliope- - 28 May 2005 16:04 GMT > Yeah, what the heck is going on with all this? SO thinks that they are feeling lonely, and reaching out to those that once loved them. Sort of makes sense to me, but they are (all three of them).. the ones that originally wanted out of the marriages.
 Signature Cal~
calliope 123 at gmail dot com
Casey - 29 May 2005 05:15 GMT -Calliope- said
> > Yeah, what the heck is going on with all this? > > SO thinks that they are feeling lonely, and reaching out to those that once > loved them. Sort of makes sense to me, but they are (all three of them).. > the ones that originally wanted out of the marriages. Actually, that describes what's going on with my ex very well.
Casey
kato - 28 May 2005 19:40 GMT > Not only have I run into my ex, but she waves in an effort to get me to > talk for a while. That's when I quickly bury myself in a group of > friends. I'm sure if you thought about it, you could think of a $300 place to bury yourself instead.
sorry.... I have got to get out more.
Casey - 29 May 2005 05:12 GMT kato said
> > Not only have I run into my ex, but she waves in an effort to get me to > > talk for a while. That's when I quickly bury myself in a group of [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > sorry.... I have got to get out more. ROFL ... yeah, I think that might be a good idea.
I'll even give you some more ammo - I just spent the whole afternoon on a boat hanging out with about a billion other people on boats in a very popular shallow area that becomes one big party on days like this.
The friend's boat we were tied up to just happened to have a number of young women on board - this guy usually manages to do that. Somehow at one point, all the women were temporarily on the friend's boat and all the guys were on ours. We began to overhear 3 of the women were discussing their breast implants and the guy talk suddenly stopped. They had our complete attention when they began to massage each other to compare the "squeezability" of their implants.
That was shortly after the "Girls Gone Wild" boat floated through while offering t-shirts to any woman willing to pull her top down.
All in all, it was a very nice day.
Okay - does that convince you to get out more?
Casey
kato - 29 May 2005 05:44 GMT > kato said > > [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > Okay - does that convince you to get out more? Yep it does. I did see a naked mannequin in a store window today, and I think it was female....so I'm catching up.
DrLith - 29 May 2005 14:27 GMT > Yep it does. I did see a naked mannequin in a store window today, and I > think it was female....so I'm catching up. Kinda answers the "real or fake" question from the git-go, doesn't it?
Casey - 29 May 2005 15:56 GMT kato said
> "Casey" <cclremovethispart@cox.net> wrote in message > > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > Yep it does. I did see a naked mannequin in a store window today, and I > think it was female....so I'm catching up. Got any pictures?
Casey
YooperBoyka - 29 May 2005 08:06 GMT > kato said >> [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > Okay - does that convince you to get out more? I dunno 'bout him,...but I'm beginning to think I could live without snow on Christmas.
Casey - 29 May 2005 16:07 GMT YooperBoyka said
> "Casey" wrote
> > That was shortly after the "Girls Gone Wild" boat floated through while > > offering t-shirts to any woman willing to pull her top down. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > I dunno 'bout him,...but I'm beginning to think I could live without snow on > Christmas. The beach sand is very white if that helps any.
Casey
John Riggs - 29 May 2005 16:21 GMT | YooperBoyka said | [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] | | Casey ....and it's a whole lot warmer too.
YooperBoyka - 30 May 2005 12:00 GMT > | YooperBoyka said > | [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > ....and it's a whole lot warmer too. Gauging by Casey's description, I don't think I'll be looking at the sand.
:^) Nearl J Icarus - 29 May 2005 11:59 GMT >Yeah, what the heck is going on with all this? >Not only have I run into my ex, but she waves in an effort to get me to >talk for a while. That's when I quickly bury myself in a group of >friends. My ex has been trying to get me to come over for dinner on the weekends. She didn't do that when we were married. She calls and wants to talk. I'm not much of a conversationist and I'm not interested in telling her whats going on with my life. I haven't told her I'm engaged. I figure she'll find out through the kids. I did inform them that they have a future evil step-mother.
Casey - 29 May 2005 16:05 GMT Nearl J Icarus said
> Casey said > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > my life. I haven't told her I'm engaged. I figure she'll find out through the > kids. I did inform them that they have a future evil step-mother. Three days after mine moved back to town recently, she called to say she was "passing by" and wanted to stop and talk for a while (as in chat) unless I didn't want her to. I agreed ... that I didn't want her to.
This was one in a string of efforts to get back into my life. The earlier ones were a bit more blunt - for example, calling and asking if she could move back in. The direct approach didn't work, so she went to the indirect approach of trying to "be friends". I can't do that because I know where it will lead.
I could easily claim that it was a great feeling to get finally back at her by saying no, but the honest truth is that all of this has just been painful. In some ways, she has finally found the last emotions that can be dragged out of me about the whole divorce and all the events leading up to it. Years ago I was desperately trying to keep her - now I'm having to push the same woman away.
"The circle is now complete".
The only satisfying part of it is just being pleased with myself for not allowing the door to open even a little bit.
Casey
John Riggs - 29 May 2005 16:15 GMT Good for you, Casey.
Fortunately for me, only my second wife tried any of that. It does get easier once you've resolved to shut them out.
| Nearl J Icarus said | > Casey said [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] | | Casey saulgoode - 29 May 2005 16:29 GMT Now that's an admirable show of emotional fortitude. I hope when the time comes for me -- and it will -- that I can hold strong against that temptation.
I think I'm about 6mos out from where Casey was 3yrs ago (just guessing), having tried to beg her back and failed, and finally deciding nuffs a nuff and letting go so I can butter someone else's bread.
- Saul
> Good for you, Casey. > [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > | > | Casey Casey - 29 May 2005 16:41 GMT saulgoode said
> Now that's an admirable show of emotional fortitude. I hope when the > time comes for me -- and it will -- that I can hold strong against that > temptation. It's one of those personal decisions that everyone has to make for themselves. The key is to make sure you don't allow yourself to be talked into something that you know is not the right thing to do.
> I think I'm about 6mos out from where Casey was 3yrs ago (just > guessing), having tried to beg her back and failed, and finally > deciding nuffs a nuff and letting go so I can butter someone else's > bread. You're guess is pretty much correct, but it was about 4 years ago in my case. The point of no return had been reached, but I struggled with all kinds of emotions while working on the divorce that was final about 3 1/2 years ago.
Hopefully it helps to hear stories from those of us who have been through somewhat similar experiences and somehow managed to survive and move on. I know it helped me a lot starting about 4 1/2 years ago.
Casey
Nearl J Icarus - 30 May 2005 11:43 GMT >It's one of those personal decisions that everyone has to make for >themselves. The key is to make sure you don't allow yourself to be >talked into something that you know is not the right thing to do. And have to figure out if anything has changed. If nothing has changed then all you're in for is a complete repeat. That was the thing I realized in the aftermath of the last time she wanted a separation. The old patterns went right back into place. My mother mentioned that if I could her to dance like she did me, I'd have it made. It was just a one way street.
rj - 29 May 2005 16:29 GMT (snip)
>events leading up to it. Years ago I was desperately trying to keep >her - now I'm having to push the same woman away. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >Casey Y'know, Casey... I cannot imagine how difficult this must be for you. But based on all that you've said the course you're following is probably the best one.
I've never had to deal with such a situation... When my ex and I split, the acrimony and the sense of betrayal was so intense that there was never any impulse (at least on my part) to try to get back together. She was hurting me, she was hurting our children, and she was even hurting herself. And I hated every part of it and I hated her for what she was doing both to me and to our children.
Some part of me knew that *any* attempt to get back together with the woman would be a horrendous mistake. And, thank God, she never tried. If she had tried, I might have been tempted... "for the children's sake".
rj
Casey - 29 May 2005 16:46 GMT rj said
> (snip) > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > But based on all that you've said the course you're following is > probably the best one. Fortunately, I do know that it is the best course so at least I don't have to lay awake at night and wonder. Still, it is painful to have to deal with this now after everything else that has happened.
If this had happened right after the divorce, it would have been very difficult to answer that question to myself. I think it would have been a terrible mistake to have gotten back together even back then, but I honestly can't say what I would have done.
Casey
BP - 29 May 2005 19:33 GMT >Three days after mine moved back to town recently, she called to say >she was "passing by" and wanted to stop and talk for a while (as in >chat) unless I didn't want her to. I agreed ... that I didn't want >her to. <snip>
>The only satisfying part of it is just being pleased with myself for >not allowing the door to open even a little bit. Have you actually spelled it out to her, as in "We are divorced. It was a very painful process for me. I do not want to be your friend or have any social contact with you, other than the minimum communication regarding our son." She knows how you feel, yet keeps bugging you anyway?
Hang in there.
BP
Casey - 29 May 2005 21:34 GMT BP said
> >Three days after mine moved back to town recently, she called to say > >she was "passing by" and wanted to stop and talk for a while (as in [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > regarding our son." She knows how you feel, yet keeps bugging you > anyway? Yep, you pretty much described it. The phone calls have stopped finally though.
Casey
Nearl J Icarus - 30 May 2005 11:52 GMT >Have you actually spelled it out to her, as in "We are divorced. It >was a very painful process for me. I do not want to be your friend or >have any social contact with you, other than the minimum communication That approach wouldn't work with my ex. The pain she's dishing out now is justified by all the pain you dished out. (that it takes two people to fight is immaterial). So you would have no right to feel that way. Been down that road. I was hoping that she would be satisfied with her revenge before it made me resentful. She wasn't.
Nearl J Icarus - 30 May 2005 11:36 GMT >Three days after mine moved back to town recently, she called to say >she was "passing by" and wanted to stop and talk for a while (as in >chat) unless I didn't want her to. I agreed ... that I didn't want >her to. That's what I like so much about caller-id. If my son isn't over there, I'm not answering the phone. Well, mostly.
-Calliope- - 30 May 2005 13:00 GMT > In article <RSkme.4955$%Z2.2462@lakeread08>, cclremovethispart@cox.net > says... [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > That's what I like so much about caller-id. If my son isn't over > there, I'm not answering the phone. Well, mostly. Unless he calls my cell, I don't answer the phone for my ex.. and even then I still mostly let it go to voice mail, unless I'm feeling particuarly patient.
 Signature Cal~
calliope 123 at gmail dot com
DrLith - 26 May 2005 20:14 GMT > Dr. Laura says a bf/gf should not even meet the kids until they are engaged > to the parent. Oh, *that's* a big improvement. (Testing a man's sarcasm sectors.)
"Hey, kiddos, meet your new step-mom! Of course, don't get too close to her, 'cause she had no idea what she was getting into and we're going to be divorced within 5 years!"
Barbara Didrichsen - 27 May 2005 00:21 GMT >> Dr. Laura says a bf/gf should not even meet the kids until they are engaged >> to the parent. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >her, 'cause she had no idea what she was getting into and we're going to >be divorced within 5 years!" Sounds like advice only an opinionated, never-been-divorced person would hand out.
As a divorced person with parents who divorced (albeit after I was an adult), this sounds like something out of Grimm's Fairy Tales. Especially if I had young kids living at home -- some or all of the time -- I'd sure want to have some degree of comfort that my prospective partner and my kids would get along.
Since my 19-year old son is moving out in September (it's official - he signed a lease!), not a big concern for me anymore. On the off chance that I ever have another relationship, we're getting to the "should I still let him have a key to the house or not?" stage of our lives ;-))
Barb
Casey - 27 May 2005 15:26 GMT Barbara Didrichsen said
> As a divorced person with parents who divorced (albeit after I was an > adult), this sounds like something out of Grimm's Fairy Tales. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > "should I still let him have a key to the house or not?" stage of our > lives ;-)) Of course you should still let him have a key ... as long as it doesn't also fit the new deadbolt you use when you're home. ;-)
Casey
m_eL - 27 May 2005 15:55 GMT >> Since my 19-year old son is moving out in September (it's official - >> he signed a lease!), not a big concern for me anymore. On the off >> chance that I ever have another relationship, we're getting to the >> "should I still let him have a key to the house or not?" stage of our >> lives ;-)) My SS and SD have keys but if they don't knock before coming in they just might be sorry. I wouldn't even walk into my parents home now without knocking and being let in, unless arranged in advance or an emergency. I have the key to my ex's house but would never enter without permission.
Congrats on your son's upcoming independence!!!
Nearl J Icarus - 28 May 2005 11:42 GMT >might be sorry. I wouldn't even walk into my parents home now without >knocking and being let in, unless arranged in advance or an emergency. Other than my own, my parents homes were the only ones I'd walk in without knocking. My Dad lived with one of his brothers. My uncle could see who came in first and he'd tell Dad who it was. I was either the "#2 son" or "the Arab." He said that "Arab" meant "wanderer."
My grandmother used to get a little annoyed with me because I'd always knock. So I started saying "knock, knock" when I'd walk through the door. I 'knocked' and she didn't have to answer the door. She lived a block away and I was over there all the time. I'd head for the cookie jar first. (-8
Rog' - 27 May 2005 16:26 GMT > Barbara Didrichsen said >> Since my 19-year old son is moving out in September (it's official >> - he signed a lease!), not a big concern for me anymore. On the >> off chance that I ever have another relationship, we're getting to >> the "should I still let him have a key to the house or not?" stage of >> our lives ;-)) Casey:
> Of course you should still let him have a key ... as long as it > doesn't also fit the new deadbolt you use when you're home. ;-) Agreed. We have keys to a neighbor's house and I have a key to my former in-law's house, but only for use in an emergency. =R=
Nearl J Icarus - 27 May 2005 10:38 GMT >Let me give you my experience as a kid of divorced parents. Parents divorced >when I was 5. I didn't mind meeting her new boyfriends (which started within [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >or more years, then break up. The break up was harder for me each time, and I >eventually learned that no relationship is permanent. I don't think I would have ever tolerated a step-father. My parents separated when I was 5 and there was only one guy that she dated that I actually liked. My first lesson on life is that when they want to leave, they're gone. That wasn't from my mother dating. That was when my mother walked out on Dad.
|
|
|