> Just like in golf every shot sucks, but you made contact with the ball, so they're
> all good shots.

Signature
SD:)
"Intellectuals solve problems; geniuses prevent them.(A.E.)"
My disclaimer: I can say, but can't make you see...(S.D.)
>I realize you might not be reading this --- but, JIC I am a low single
>digit player. Not every shot in golf sucks; just those poorly struck
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Now, I am off to play golf with some friends today...
One could also say that No-Limit Hold 'em Poker is a good analogy for
life.
1. It takes years to become a skilled player.
2. No matter what your skill level, some days you are just dealt
hands that you can't win with.
3. Periodically, opportunities arise to 'go for it' where you can win
big.
4. Over the long haul, your overall experience will be based on your
ability to foretell good decisions.
5. Patience is a virtue.
6. Sometimes you can bluff your way out of trouble.
YooperBoyka - 27 Aug 2007 21:04 GMT
>>I realize you might not be reading this --- but, JIC I am a low single
>>digit player. Not every shot in golf sucks; just those poorly struck
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> 5. Patience is a virtue.
> 6. Sometimes you can bluff your way out of trouble.
BAH!!!
Hockey is life, the rest is details.

Signature
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
S.D. - 28 Aug 2007 18:53 GMT
> One could also say that No-Limit Hold 'em Poker is a good analogy for
> life.
I disagree - and, not because I think golf is life's answer; its just
that golf faces each player with "situations similar in nature" to what
they might face in their normal life. Poker and Hockey doesn't remotely
do that; as I've experience since learning to play poker and played
hockey as a farm kid in the mid-west.
Golf faces each player regardless of skill with a obstacles and
conditions requiring acknowledgement, then assessment, followed by
decision, then "execution" of skill working towards a optimum strokes
per hole and the holes vary on all course with the rules remaining the
same. Golf doesn't deal anyone obstacles that can't be dealt with,
there is a solution for all. Which isn't the case with poker or hockey
when the 3 best players are out.
Poker, on the other hand comes down to you either win or loose based on
some judgement, guesstimating, and some luck, and ability to read tells
and or counting cards (known as cheating). Each poker game offers
limited number of choices, and a game can be over is minutes not
allowing one to minimize the outcome.
In golf, there's NEVER a winner against a golf course; which is who we
play in a tournament. Yes, there's some luck but, it's not nearly as
prevalent as when playing any type of card game. In golf, we "can't" go
for it either, NO matter how good we are; and can't bluff the golf
course or an obstacle. ;-)
Hockey is like football (which I played for 7yrs), baseball, soccer and
other team sports - regardless of how good one person is at their chosen
task - winning or loosing is the result of team effort and if others
succeed or fail at their individual tasks.

Signature
SD:)
"Intellectuals solve problems; geniuses prevent them.(A.E.)"
My disclaimer: I can say, but can't make you see...(S.D.)