> Sheesh - what's up with this Don - did any of the fosties you 'trained'
> to be state jailers go on to murder, rape, or abuse our children ?
Trained?
> Stop taking children from safe homes and placing them with murderers.
> Please.
As far as I know Don wasn't a caseworker. How could he place children?
** You seem to have missed this below.
> ==============================
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Edson Lamont Brown, 44, of Salisbury was arrested Wednesday morning on
> charges of abuse and murder in the death of Kyla Edwards.
You seem to have missed this.
" The girl was
> in the foster care of ***Brown's girlfriend*** for several months prior to her
> death, said Wicomico County State's Attorney Davis Ruark.
> Brown's girlfriend, who was not identified by authorities, had left him
> to care for the child while she was out of town Tuesday. She found the
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> was heartbreaking to see the child laying there on that stainless steel
> table with those injuries."
You seem to have missed this.
> Law enforcement agents determined **Brown had been caring for the child** at
> the time of her death
> and a warrant was issued for his arrest at 2 a.m.
> Wednesday. The Wicomico County Sheriff's Office called him in for
> questioning and arrested him shortly after.
>
> "When I saw him, his demeanor was very matter of fact," Ruark said.
Ah, the old abusive boyfriend number. Now where have we heard of this
before where CPS stepped in before it got this bad, eh?
> Brown, who has a criminal history that includes robbery and domestic
> abuse, is being held without bond. He faces charges of second-degree
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> The case is being investigated further by the Maryland State Police
> Homicide Unit and the Child Advocacy Center.
Greegor - 21 Dec 2006 21:41 GMT
Jake wrote
> Sheesh - what's up with this Don - did any of the fosties you 'trained'
> to be state jailers go on to murder, rape, or abuse our children ?
Kane wrote
> Trained?
Kane, you ARE Don, and you said you trained Fosters.
Jake wrote
> Stop taking children from safe homes and placing them with murderers.
> Please.
Kane wrote
> As far as I know Don wasn't a caseworker. How could he place children?
You were involved, so much you had to be admonished to be less so.
> ** You seem to have missed this below.
...
> The child's foster mother has not been arrested.
0:-> - 21 Dec 2006 21:57 GMT
> Jake wrote
>> Sheesh - what's up with this Don - did any of the fosties you 'trained'
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Kane, you ARE Don, and you said you trained Fosters.
Provide your proof.
I did, if you wish to expand the meaning, 'train' relatives by
supporting them in their attempts to foster and adopt.
> Jake wrote
>> Stop taking children from safe homes and placing them with murderers.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> You were involved,
Now?
> so much you had to be admonished to be less so.
Admonished? To be less involved? Are you chugging again? Or huffing today?
Don told me he was asked to discontinue the website, and move all the
records to the NorthWest Adoption Exchange website manager. I presume he
did so. He said he then found his account closed before he could delete
the website pages off the FTP accessed server. He then requested the IT
people in charge of it remove the site for him.
When he ran the URLs they did not open his old pages, so he naturally
presumed they were taken down as requested.
Apparently they had them in a backup folder on the server, or another
one, or we wouldn't have seen a spider find and produce a link to them.
That's my understanding of the technology issues involved, and Don's
involvement. He managed a website. He didn't place children. He closed
it when asked, and the children didn't disappear. They just went to
another web page run by someone else under contract to the state, I
presume.
>> ** You seem to have missed this below.
> ....
>> The child's foster mother has not been arrested.
You seemed to have missed that above.
In other words, you don't wish to discuss the issues, you want to
"prove" I'm a caseworker. So far you haven't. Nor will you ever, despite
what your stupid buddies try to convince you of.
0:->
0:-> - 21 Dec 2006 22:12 GMT
** should have been "how," not "now."
*** additional information.
> > Jake wrote
> >> Sheesh - what's up with this Don - did any of the fosties you 'trained'
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Admonished? To be less involved? Are you chugging again? Or huffing today?
*** Who admonished Don?
> Don told me he was asked to discontinue the website, and move all the
> records to the NorthWest Adoption Exchange website manager. I presume he
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> 0:->
Greegor - 22 Dec 2006 00:38 GMT
Kane wrote
> Don told me he was asked to discontinue the website, and move all the
> records to the NorthWest Adoption Exchange website manager. I presume he
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> another web page run by someone else under contract to the state, I
> presume.
That's an awful lot of back pedaling to do for someone ELSE!
And you should be SO PROUD that as YOU said, you
set up Donald Fisher to be your ""false trail"" after
people figured out it was you!
Of course, it never occurred to anybody just how stupid
it would be for you to set up a friend and allie as a ""false trail""
and to be so outraged that ""they"" might get some grief.
You're some sort of secret agent! ROFL!
Do you have a shoe phone like Maxwell Smart?
Dan Sullivan - 22 Dec 2006 01:47 GMT
> Kane wrote
> > Don told me he was asked to discontinue the website, and move all the
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> You're some sort of secret agent! ROFL!
> Do you have a shoe phone like Maxwell Smart?
Kane and I frequently avail ourselves of the Cone of Silence... what?
0:-> - 22 Dec 2006 02:32 GMT
> Kane wrote
> > Don told me he was asked to discontinue the website, and move all the
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> That's an awful lot of back pedaling to do for someone ELSE!
Explanation in answer to your questions is backpeddling?
Would you mind if I applied that to your answers, as few as they are,
when I ask you a question?
> And you should be SO PROUD that as YOU said, you
> set up Donald Fisher to be your ""false trail"" after
> people figured out it was you!
What's pride got to do with utility?
What makes you think there was a time line issue?
> Of course, it never occurred to anybody just how stupid
> it would be for you to set up a friend and allie as a ""false trail""
> and to be so outraged that ""they"" might get some grief.
What's an "allie?"
What makes you think I knew how criminally minded folks could be from
your side of the argument? Until it was too late?
> You're some sort of secret agent! ROFL!
I am? I must be a good one, since I don't know that I am. Now that's
going undercover. <chuckle>
> Do you have a shoe phone like Maxwell Smart?
No, but I keep a roll of toilet paper I had printed with photo on it.
Nearly out. Have to get some more.
R R R RR R R R R R R R R
Greg, what you and your cronies haven't figured out is the outcome of
all your 'expose the agent'
efforts.
But then none of you are very good at thinking, and especially not at
thinking ahead. You don't even recognize it when your worthy 'opponent'
does think ahead and sets you up for a fall depending on your moves.
I don't have to do a thing. Just watch you make fools of yourselves,
and quite frankly take some very serious personal risks.
Enjoy.
Kane
Greegor - 22 Dec 2006 07:15 GMT
G > That's an awful lot of back pedaling to do for someone ELSE!
K > Explanation in answer to your questions is backpeddling?
Peddling fits you better than pedaling.
K > Would you mind if I applied that to your
K > answers, as few as they are, when I ask you a question?
You'll have to take that up with the proper authorities.
G > And you should be SO PROUD that as YOU said, you
G > set up Donald Fisher to be your ""false trail"" after
G > people figured out it was you!
K > What's pride got to do with utility?
K > What makes you think there was a time line issue?
Please describe your exemptions from time.
G > Of course, it never occurred to anybody just how stupid
G > it would be for you to set up a friend and allie as a ""false
trail""
G > and to be so outraged that ""they"" might get some grief.
K > What's an "allie?"
Every "peddler" has one.
K > What makes you think I knew how criminally
K > minded folks could be from your side of the
K > argument? Until it was too late?
That IS puzzling, particularly since in some
of your Commander McBrag moments you
boasted about expertise on such matters.
Of course it might* have occurred to you
before you posted public profanity for over a year, Don!
G > You're some sort of secret agent! ROFL!
K > I am? I must be a good one, since I don't know
K > that I am. Now that's going undercover. <chuckle>
G > Do you have a shoe phone like Maxwell Smart?
K > No, but I keep a roll of toilet paper I had printed with photo on
it.
K > Nearly out. Have to get some more.
K > R R R RR R R R R R R R R
G > Greg, what you and your cronies haven't figured out
G > is the outcome of all your 'expose the agent' efforts.
A HUGE belly laugh, Donald?
K > But then none of you are very good at thinking,
K > and especially not at thinking ahead. You don't
K > even recognize it when your worthy 'opponent' does think
K > ahead and sets you up for a fall depending on your moves.
You're the one who HARASSED and publicly posted obscenity
for over a year and thought you were immune behind your duck
blind of anonymity. Oopsie! you got ID'd! ROFL!
Great thinking ahead there Donald!
K > I don't have to do a thing. Just watch you
K > make fools of yourselves, and quite frankly
K > take some very serious personal risks.
Back to the megalomaniac ominous crap eh? Ptptpt!