Family Forum / Parenting / Adoption / May 2007

Bio parents, apparently. You seem to be one, in fact.

Is that what you call it when you post?

"...and I'm using yet another nym to try and look like a crowd...a
common tactic of the anti-government loonybin crowd. ..."

Right, "Jason?"

You seem to be delusional. How many nyms so far?

Here's the fack, jack, the latest figures available from:
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm05/table3_17.htm

Sexual abuse data:
.........................Number     %
Parent                17,543       26.3
Other Relative   19,171       28.7
Foster Parent        253       0.4
Residential
Facility Staff           137         0.2

It's not hard to see who the perps are, now is it? And this is only
the first chart on the page referenced.
Family is f.cking the child victims, bright boy. At horrendous rates

Other categories of perps of sexual abuse of children listed below are
included in two other charts at the linked citation: .
....................................Number     %
Child Daycare
Provider                         1,186      1.8 (CPS does not place
children in daycare, parents do)
Unmarried Partner
of Parent                        4,125    6.2 **
Legal Guardian                  87      0.1
Other Professionals           319   0.5

** check that out, stupid. You know a few of these, don't you now?

Friends or Neighbors      3,255      4.9
Other                             15,521    23.3
Unknown or Missing      5,139       7.7
Total Perpetrators       66,736  100.0

That's 66 thousand perps of sexual abuse of children with 253 of them
being foster parents. Or 0.00379. which is .379 percent. The chart
rounds up to 0.4 percent.

Foster parents ARE going to be caught for sexual abuse. Bio parents
are much harder to catch, as are others. NONE of the listed perps,
other than foster parents, are required to allow CPS into their homes
unannounced, and actually interview children with NO civil rights
limitation. The number of other than foster parents that escape
detection has to be in the hundreds of thousands per year.

In other words, liar, parents,  relatives, and others than foster
parents account for a super majority proportion of sexual abuse
compared to foster parents.

So, little man, little puny scrawny lying pervert, if CPS is going out
of its way to make children available for predator molesters of
children don't they think they could take lessons from you? WHO f.cks
his own daughter regularly?

Yer a NAMBLA member trying to divert attention from your sexual abuse
of your own children, aren't you?

When a parent does it, it escapes the media rather often. It's not
news.

When a parent does it, he or she can easily hide the violation of
their own child. Notice the majority of all those caught are happening
with older children that CAN report.

The tiny babies and toddlers can't. And often if the abuse stops they
cannot say what happened to them because they lack a conscience memory
of it.

The chart at ...

http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm05/table3_10.htm

... supports my claim. The number of reported sexual abuse cases for
the period surveyed is lower to begin with and climbs rapidly with
each subsequent age group. Topping out in the 16 up age group because
of course they are not going to be as vulnerable and can protect
themselves, and because they are more reactive to shame and guilt and
self blaming. -- thus less likely to report.

There are likely hundreds of thousands of children each year, f.cked
BY PARENTS AND FAMILY, that totally escape forever any database such
as we see above.

When did you stop f.cking your kids? R R R R R R R  R