 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Family Forum / Parenting / Adoption / May 2008Undisputable Proof that Dan Sullivan is Completely Full Of sh.t
Dan buddy, There is just something about you that doesn't add up. You have made some of the wildest claims I have ever seen regarding Child Protective Services, in one single thread alone. I personally think that you are completely full of sh.t. And I am sure others in this group will agree, as the following is undisputible proof of my claim that you are completely full of sh.t. Here is your one opportunity to prove otherwise. Dan Sullivan - Prove this claim… DS > And their failure to comply with their own rules and regulations DS > always bites them on the a.s. LK > Always? DS > Yes. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/409979f d34baec80 Please prove this claim… DS > You asked me to post messages from people who acknowledged my help. DS > And that's exactly what I did. When what you were clearly asked for was…. LK > What proof do you have of this? If you're going to tell me it's all LK > in the archives, then provide the links to where all of these people LK > said, "Oh thank you Dan, I couldn't have done it without you." http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/dd8fa01 24ba2c35f specifically notice where I said all Regarding DS > I have helped get many, many children back to their parents. LK > How many exactly? DS > More than 40. LK > How did you do it? DS > By knowing the system better than the people in the system. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/dd8fa01 24ba2c35f Which I must still ask you, Dan Sullivan, to prove as you have so far failed to do so. Also, would you, Dan Sullivan, Please prove this claim… DS > I do NOT have complete knowledge of how CPS is supposed to function. DS > But I do know more about the system than the people in it. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/d1f8ae5 1894eab5f Please prove this claim…. DS > What you fail to recognize, greg, is that I never did anything DS > inappropriate, proven by the fact that CPS never found any evidence of DS > abuse or neglect. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/4cd69d3 7c342faf7 Please prove this claim... DS > But the advice I dispense is extremely effective in getting children DS > back to their parents from CPS custody.. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/7f8c9a5 45dd707cc "I personally think that you are completely full of sh.t. And I am sure others in this group will agree, as the following is undisputible proof of my claim that you are completely full of sh.t." You didn't post any "indisputable proof." All you did was complain that you weren't satisfied with my answers to your questions. Life is full of disappointments. Get used to it. Dan Sullivan - Prove this claim… DS > And their failure to comply with their own rules and regulations DS > always bites them on the a.s. LK > Always? DS > Yes. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/409979f d34baec80 The judicial system has been "dumbed down" to enable incompetent caseworkers to overcome the guarantees in the Bill Of Rights. They can horribly break their own rules and regulations and the court does not hold them accountable. The court does NOT force them to follow their own rules and regulations, commonly using the excuse that safety of the child is paramount. One famous example of this recently is the Polygamist case in TX, where CPS went to a Judge having nothing but a phone call report from a "Sarah" who they knew does not exist and they knew was a woman with a long history of prank calls. The uprooting of all of those families was based on what amounts to a prank call. Even though this is known, rather than stop and reverse course, the court has moved forward declaring that the court and caseworkers had acted on the call "in good faith". The "fruit of the poison tree" logic is not being applied. In other words, the ends justify any means and to hell with the Bill Of Rights in the US Constitution. > Dan Sullivan - Prove this claim… > DS > And their failure to comply with their own rules and regulations [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > The judicial syst All that crap has nothing to do with me. Dan Sullivan - Prove this claim… DS > And their failure to comply with their own rules and regulations DS > always bites them on the a.s. LK > Always? DS > Yes. G > The judicial syst <snip> DS > All that crap has nothing to do with me. You said that "their failure to comply with their own rules and regulations always bites them on the a.s", didn't you Dan? How would that happen in a system "dumbed down" so morons could "make cases"? What Judge wants caseworkers stupidity to "bite[] them on the a.s" ? > Dan Sullivan - Prove this claim… > DS > And their failure to comply with their own rules and regulations [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > You said that "their failure to comply with their own rules > and regulations always bites them on the a.s", didn't you Dan? Yes. > How would that happen in a system "dumbed down" > so morons could "make cases"? I don't care who "makes cases," if they fail to comply with their own rules, regulations, policies or procedures, I will use it against them. > What Judge wants caseworkers stupidity > to "bite[] them on the a.s" ? ??? LK > Dan Sullivan - Prove this claim… DS > And their failure to comply with their own rules and regulations DS > always bites them on the a.s. LK > Always? DS > Yes. G > The judicial syst <snip> DS > All that crap has nothing to do with me. G > You said that "their failure to comply with their own rules G > and regulations always bites them on the a.s", didn't you Dan? DS > Yes. You said "always" which most people realize is false. It's like saying the right thing always happens. Reality proves otherwise. It would be heavenly if the devil always lost. G > How would that happen in a system "dumbed down" G > so morons could "make cases"? DS > I don't care who "makes cases," if they fail DS > to comply with their own rules, regulations, DS > policies or procedures, I will use it against them. If you are allowed to. Well, You are in one of the original 13 colonies which have a stronger state constitution since they actually experienced the tyranny of the crown. Is it possible that your state's constitutional protection of families is stronger than in most other (post colonies) states? When I was in court last time I was prevented from cross examining certain materials and even prevented from cross examining many witnesses. My attorney informed me that had I not won, blocking cross examination of those documents and people would have been SERIOUS grounds for appeal. My attorney (2nd chair) was actually amazed that the Judge prevented those witnesses because they were pertinent and even if they had not been pertinent, the Judge can't decide that before the witnesses testify. The restrictions were blatantly illegal and prevented me from embarassing CPS and their court even worse than I did. G > What Judge wants caseworkers stupidity G > to "bite[] them on the a.s" ? DS > ??? I watched a Judge ROLL HIS EYES about the blatantly BS and malicious story a caseworker told in court. Yet he did not start perjury proceedings or chastise the caseworker. From my standpoint, the real world court is so far from "as advertised" in my old high school civics classes that it's treasonous. > LK > Dan Sullivan - Prove this claim… > DS > And their failure to comply with their own rules and regulations [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > You said "always" which most people realize is false. The subject of the discussion between myself and LK that precipitated that particular response of mine was my advice and how I deal with CPS. I was NOT making a general statement. > It's like saying the right thing always happens. > Reality proves otherwise. > It would be heavenly if the devil always lost. Well, as usual, you lose again, greg. You took my words out of context to make me look foolish and you only made yourself look foolish!! > G > How would that happen in a system "dumbed down" > G > so morons could "make cases"? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > If you are allowed to. Either it comes up in an Ad Review, a Fair Hearing or Court... or any number of other ways. > Well, You are in one of the original 13 colonies which > have a stronger state constitution since they actually > experienced the tyranny of the crown. You found a history book in a dumpster? > Is it possible that your state's constitutional > protection of families is stronger than in most > other (post colonies) states? Look it up and let me know. > When I was in court last time I wa <<<snip>>> No one cares about your crap, greg. > G > What Judge wants caseworkers stupidity > G > to "bite[] them on the a.s" ? > > DS > ??? > > I wa See above. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2010 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.