Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Parenting / July 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Bicycle at what age?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jeanne Clelland - 23 Jun 2004 00:13 GMT
What's a good age to get a real bike (with training wheels)?  My son is
almost 4, and I'm thinking of getting him a bike for his birthday.  My
main concern is that we live on a hill with a fair bit of traffic, so we
don't have a great place for him to practice riding without going
somewhere else.

Jeanne
RLK - 23 Jun 2004 00:51 GMT
> What's a good age to get a real bike (with training wheels)?  My son is
> almost 4, and I'm thinking of getting him a bike for his birthday.  My
> main concern is that we live on a hill with a fair bit of traffic, so we
> don't have a great place for him to practice riding without going
> somewhere else.

DS's been on the Radio Flyer tricycle since 3. He's on the tiny side. We'll
probably get a RF bike with training wheels when he turns 5, with a new
helmet. I worry about someone snatching him (a child went missing in our
area several years ago) so he cannot be out of my sight for even a second.
He understands where he's supposed to be at all times. You'll have to put
barriers around the area you want him to be in and to go no further. At that
age, they don't mind going around in a small area over and over.

If traffic is really that much of a concern, you could also get him a bike
with a long handle attached to the back of it, you hold on to the handle
while he pedals downhill/uphill etc. I don't know which company makes this,
maybe Little Tykes or PlaySkool?
RLK - 23 Jun 2004 00:54 GMT
http://www.redwagons.com/rafl5prtr.html

> If traffic is really that much of a concern, you could also get him a bike
> with a long handle attached to the back of it, you hold on to the handle
> while he pedals downhill/uphill etc.
Sue - 23 Jun 2004 01:46 GMT
Hmm, I'm thinking that the girls started riding their bikes around 2ish.
Small bikes of course, but they moved on to bigger bikes and eventually to
no training wheels when they were around 6-7 years old. We have always lived
on a street with sidewalks though and they were allowed to ride up and down
our steet, with some bounderies at first. Now that they are 11, 9 and 7,
they are riding around the block and up and down our street and going across
the street.
--
Sue (mom to three girls)

> What's a good age to get a real bike (with training wheels)?  My son is
> almost 4, and I'm thinking of getting him a bike for his birthday.  My
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Jeanne
toto - 23 Jun 2004 04:54 GMT
>Hmm, I'm thinking that the girls started riding their bikes around 2ish.

Are you sure?  Most two year olds can't peddle at all.  The earliest I
have seen kids peddle is around 3.   And usually that's on tricycles
not on bicycles.  Do they even make bikes small enough for 2 year olds
to reach the peddles?

>Small bikes of course, but they moved on to bigger bikes and eventually to
>no training wheels when they were around 6-7 years old. We have always lived
>on a street with sidewalks though and they were allowed to ride up and down
>our steet, with some bounderies at first. Now that they are 11, 9 and 7,
>they are riding around the block and up and down our street and going across
>the street.

I think my kids were 6 or 7 when they learned to ride a real bicycle,
but we didn't do training wheels, iiRC.

--
Dorothy

There is no sound, no cry in all the world
that can be heard unless someone listens ..

The Outer Limits
Sue - 23 Jun 2004 11:52 GMT
toto <scarecrow@wicked.witch> wrote in message
> Are you sure?  Most two year olds can't peddle at all.  The earliest I
> have seen kids peddle is around 3.

I'm thinking of those little ride on bikes. I know I started those at two,
then moved on to a very small tricycle.
--
Sue (mom to three girls)
toto - 23 Jun 2004 13:32 GMT
>toto <scarecrow@wicked.witch> wrote in message
>> Are you sure?  Most two year olds can't peddle at all.  The earliest I
>> have seen kids peddle is around 3.
>
>I'm thinking of those little ride on bikes. I know I started those at two,
>then moved on to a very small tricycle.

Ah, ok.   The ones kids move with their feet can start before two
depending on the child.

--
Dorothy

There is no sound, no cry in all the world
that can be heard unless someone listens ..

The Outer Limits
Rosalie B. - 23 Jun 2004 12:42 GMT
>>Hmm, I'm thinking that the girls started riding their bikes around 2ish.
>
>Are you sure?  Most two year olds can't peddle at all.  The earliest I
>have seen kids peddle is around 3.   And usually that's on tricycles
>not on bicycles.  Do they even make bikes small enough for 2 year olds
>to reach the peddles?

We had two sizes of trikes.  I do not remember at what age they had
those, but at least one of them was riding by the time we went to
California and I guess that would have been the 2.5 yo as the other
one was under a year.  In California (age 3 and 1 to age 5+ and 3+),
they both rode trikes, and also rode on pedal cars (like a little
locomotive that they sat in and pushed pedals).  I have movies of them
riding their vehicles in both places.

>>Small bikes of course, but they moved on to bigger bikes and eventually to
>>no training wheels when they were around 6-7 years old. We have always lived
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>I think my kids were 6 or 7 when they learned to ride a real bicycle,
>but we didn't do training wheels, iiRC.

I gave my dd#1 a real bike (regular size) when she was 5 IIRC.  She
had training wheels on it until she was 7 or 8.  But she was a
cautious child.  We had a short paved street that we lived on which
was pretty much dead end, and all the other kids in the neighborhood
rode their bikes there.  The little boy next door had a much smaller
bike at a couple of years younger.  

My dd#2 learned to ride on her own without training wheels when she
was in kindergarten by borrowing her sister's bike without permission.
She would have been about 5.  But she was a much more competitive
child (not necessarily less fearful, but more driven). At that point,
we had an alley that backed up to a marsh and she learned in the
alley.

I don't remember when the younger two learned.  I know my ds knows
because he rode his bike a lot before he got a driver's license.  I
just don't know when he learned or how.  I don't know if dd#3 can even
ride a bike.  She may have learned to ride a horse before she learned
to ride a bike.

 
grandma Rosalie
Jan - 23 Jun 2004 18:59 GMT
> >>Hmm, I'm thinking that the girls started riding their bikes around 2ish.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> California and I guess that would have been the 2.5 yo as the other
> one was under a year.  

I find the current trend of buying 3- and 4- year old two wheelers to
be annoying. I think the "right" thing to do is to wait until they are
almost ready to ride without training wheels (generally 6 or so) and
then get a two wheeler, use the training wheels to actually learn to
ride a two wheeler, and then take them off.

What the people who sell the bikes seem to want is that I buy a mini
2-wheeler with very STURDY "training wheels" which they use for
several years. Probably have to buy multi two wheelers as the grow,
and in fact never even take off the training wheels on the smaller
one. In fact, the kids are riding 4-wheelers. :)

My four year old is a very enthusiastic tricycler, but her trike is
starting to get too small. Is there any option of finding a larger
trike? I've looked quite a bit and cannot find one because of the
two-wheeler trend.

We did find one that is meant for preschools at a school supply store.
Looked like it would last 100 years. Unfortunately, it cost nearly
$300

-Jan
Karen - 23 Jun 2004 22:30 GMT
> I find the current trend of buying 3- and 4- year old two wheelers to
> be annoying. I think the "right" thing to do is to wait until they are
> almost ready to ride without training wheels (generally 6 or so) and
> then get a two wheeler, use the training wheels to actually learn to
> ride a two wheeler, and then take them off.

nak... agree 100%

>  her trike is
> starting to get too small. Is there any option of finding a larger
> trike?

We have a Kettler trike for ds age 4. The body of it can be adjusted,
length from seat to pedals. German brand, very sturdy, has lasted 2
years, should last 2 more and then be passed down. Bought it at an
independent, upscale type toystore, on sale. They probably run around
$100+/- based on the features. I've seen a basic model in the
occassional catalogue.

-Karen, mom to Henry 4 and William 2 months-
Sue - 24 Jun 2004 00:42 GMT
Jan <postfromjan@mailinator.com> wrote in message
> I find the current trend of buying 3- and 4- year old two wheelers to
> be annoying. I think the "right" thing to do is to wait until they are
> almost ready to ride without training wheels (generally 6 or so) and
> then get a two wheeler, use the training wheels to actually learn to
> ride a two wheeler, and then take them off.

Well that may be okay for your family. My kids personally wanted to ride a
bike well before they were ready for a two-wheeler and I found that to be at
ages 3-4 years old. All of the bikes I have bought have been passed down
between the three girls, so our money certainly wasn't wasted. I can't
imagine not letting one of my kids have a bike just because I wanted to wait
until they rode a two-wheeler. Personally, *the right thing to do* is to
follow your child's lead as to what kind of bike they are ready to ride and
take it from there.
--
Sue (mom to three girls)
Jan - 25 Jun 2004 21:11 GMT
> Jan <postfromjan@mailinator.com> wrote in message
> > I find the current trend of buying 3- and 4- year old two wheelers to
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> follow your child's lead as to what kind of bike they are ready to ride and
> take it from there.

The problem is that I don't really have a choice. There are very few
large-size trikes out there, and there are no low priced ones.

My daughter has not asked for a two wheeler. They have large trikes
(the $300 ones) and two wheelers with training wheels at her
preschool, and she only rides the trikes.

I guess what we are going to do is wait until she is actually too big
for the trike she rides daily at our house and ask her what she wants
to do. I just wish I could provide the "larger trike" option, which
families in the past had.

Jan
Rupa Bose - 26 Jun 2004 05:35 GMT
postfromjan@mailinator.com (Jan) wrote

> The problem is that I don't really have a choice. There are very few
> large-size trikes out there, and there are no low priced ones.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> to do. I just wish I could provide the "larger trike" option, which
> families in the past had.

Have you tried places like consignment stores, garage sales, and
craigslist.com (if it exists in your area)? Someone I know finds
really good stuff for her two little guys, at throwaway prices.

Rupa
Barbara - 24 Jun 2004 00:48 GMT
postfromjan@mailinator.com (Jan) wrote in message
SNIP
> I find the current trend of buying 3- and 4- year old two wheelers to
> be annoying. I think the "right" thing to do is to wait until they are
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> trike? I've looked quite a bit and cannot find one because of the
> two-wheeler trend.

For larger tricycles, check out Kettler.  Here's one from Amazon.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0001CMXJ8/qid=1088033719/sr=8-3/r
ef=sr_8_xs_ap_i3_xgl200/002-4744342-2968808?v=glance&s=sporting-goods&n=507846

They're more expensive than a typical trike, but less than the figure
you quote, and extremely durable.  Kettler also made the Kiddy-O line
for Toys R Us at one time; given the price-point on some of the
Kettlers on Amazon, I suspect they still make a line for TRU, but now
use the Kettler name.

As you note, the trend most definitely is towards kids having upright
bicycles (whether you call them 2 or 4 wheelers) by age 4.  I doubt
that I would invest a lot of money in a trike at that age, since peer
pressure is likely to make the child (or at least MY child) want the
faster upright bike.  Most 4 year-olds can handle a 16 inch size
bicycle, which should last them for several years.  I'm told that
suburban kids who have a lot of area to ride in often ride without
training wheels at age 5, and I know of some who have done so even
younger.

Barbara
Cathy Kearns - 24 Jun 2004 00:56 GMT
> I find the current trend of buying 3- and 4- year old two wheelers to
> be annoying. I think the "right" thing to do is to wait until they are
> almost ready to ride without training wheels (generally 6 or so) and
> then get a two wheeler, use the training wheels to actually learn to
> ride a two wheeler, and then take them off.

I'm surprised you find other families chosing different cycle
types for their children a "right" or wrong issue.  Both trikes
and bikes teach kids to peddle.   Whether the kid is using
3 or 4 wheels really doesn't matter.  For those kids who may
well switch to 2 wheels, the training wheels give them that option.
I know many kids that were riding without training wheels on
those tiny little bikes, while they are still fearless and the ground
is really close if they fall over.  I got my oldest a bike when she
was 7, and she was 8 before she was willing to ride it.  Now,
6 years later she hardly ever rides her bike.  Her little sister got
a bike with training wheels when she was 4, was riding without
the training wheels within a month, and now, 5 years later, is still
willing to ride her bike anywhere.  Perhaps if my older one got a
bike before she was afraid to fall she would have learned earlier,
and liked it better, I don't know.
Jeanne Clelland - 24 Jun 2004 04:37 GMT
Well, thanks for all the input!  I think DS will probably really enjoy a
bike (he's been riding a big-wheel-type tricycle for a couple of years),
and we can pretty easily get to a park where he can ride it, so I think
we'll go ahead and go for it.

Jeanne
Hillary Israeli - 24 Jun 2004 13:04 GMT
*I find the current trend of buying 3- and 4- year old two wheelers to
*be annoying. I think the "right" thing to do is to wait until they are
*almost ready to ride without training wheels (generally 6 or so) and
*then get a two wheeler, use the training wheels to actually learn to
*ride a two wheeler, and then take them off.

I got a bike when I was 10 years old. I needed training wheels then.  
What's your point exactly? I needed those training wheels for a couple of
years although it's embarrassing to admit (and it isn't because I am some
kind of majorly uncoordinated or disabled person - I was an accomplished
swimmer and equestrienne at the time).

What's the problem with buying a two wheeler instead of a trike, anyway? I
mean, if you got a trike, you'd have to replace THAT as the kid grew. Who
cares? The cost isn't so different, really, assuming you're comparing the
same level of quality product.

Signature

    hillary israeli vmd  http://www.hillary.net  info@hillary.net
               "uber vaccae in quattuor partes divisum est."
                not-so-newly minted veterinarian-at-large :)

toto - 24 Jun 2004 20:23 GMT
>We did find one that is meant for preschools at a school supply store.
>Looked like it would last 100 years. Unfortunately, it cost nearly
>$300

I loved the big wheels my son had and they are available now.
He could still ride his at 5 or 6.  At that point he was doing
wheelies and spinning out <g>

http://www.sactoys.com/bybrand.asp?bid=141

--
Dorothy

There is no sound, no cry in all the world
that can be heard unless someone listens ..

The Outer Limits
Nikki - 24 Jun 2004 20:35 GMT
>> We did find one that is meant for preschools at a school supply
>> store. Looked like it would last 100 years. Unfortunately, it cost
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> http://www.sactoys.com/bybrand.asp?bid=141

My tall boy Hunter couldn't reach the pedals until he was nearly 5.  Those
things are weird.  He doesn't care for it now that he has a bike.  Other
kids that come over love it though so I'm not sure why he's not to
interested?  Luke can't reach the pedals yet.

--
Nikki
Mama to Hunter (5) and Luke (3)
toto - 25 Jun 2004 06:37 GMT
>My tall boy Hunter couldn't reach the pedals until he was nearly 5.  Those
>things are weird.  He doesn't care for it now that he has a bike.  Other
>kids that come over love it though so I'm not sure why he's not to
>interested?  Luke can't reach the pedals yet.

Interesting.  The seat was adjustable like the one in the URL in mine.
My son was shorter than average and he could reach the pedals at 3
just fine.

--
Dorothy

There is no sound, no cry in all the world
that can be heard unless someone listens ..

The Outer Limits
Nikki - 26 Jun 2004 05:43 GMT
> Interesting.  The seat was adjustable like the one in the URL in mine.
> My son was shorter than average and he could reach the pedals at 3
> just fine.

Ours has an adjustable seat too.  Maybe they come in different sizes and dh
got a bigger one?  Could be :-)

--
Nikki
Mama to Hunter (5) and Luke (3)
Manda - 01 Jul 2004 22:44 GMT
>> >>Hmm, I'm thinking that the girls started riding their bikes around 2ish.
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>then get a two wheeler, use the training wheels to actually learn to
>ride a two wheeler, and then take them off.

My husband was really into cycling and used to work at a bike store.
He read every cycling magazine and obsessed about training theories,
etc. Apparently, amongst the cycling world, tricycles are frowned
upon. They don't actually teach peddling as it is a different motion
than one would use on an actual bicycle. He intends to buy a small
two-wheeler bicycle when our son is ready.

For what it's worth, 6 seems like a late age for starting with
training wheels. I know that I was the last person to learn to ride a
bike and I learned at the beginning of first grade. I was so
embarassed because I was the only kid in my neighborhood who hadn't
figured it out yet. I woud guess it varies widely based on what the
neighborhood peer group is doing though. Bikes were very big in my
neighborhood.

Manda
Hillary Israeli - 23 Jun 2004 13:25 GMT
*On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:46:18 -0400, "Sue"
*<sburke9368@wideopenwest.com> wrote:
*
*>Hmm, I'm thinking that the girls started riding their bikes around 2ish.
*
*Are you sure?  Most two year olds can't peddle at all.  The earliest I
*have seen kids peddle is around 3.   And usually that's on tricycles
*not on bicycles.  Do they even make bikes small enough for 2 year olds
*to reach the peddles?

My petite 20-month-old pedals fine on the tricycle her big brother outgrew
this year! She couldn't reach the pedals when she first tried but just
recently she's been making a half-decent job of it :)

Signature

    hillary israeli vmd  http://www.hillary.net  info@hillary.net
               "uber vaccae in quattuor partes divisum est."
                not-so-newly minted veterinarian-at-large :)

Mary W. - 23 Jun 2004 13:35 GMT
> *On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:46:18 -0400, "Sue"
> *<sburke9368@wideopenwest.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> this year! She couldn't reach the pedals when she first tried but just
> recently she's been making a half-decent job of it :)

In my daughter's class (now 3 year olds), about half the class was
pedalling between 2-21/2 years. Emma just figured it out a few
months ago, she was probably 2 yr 10 months. At 3, she's quite
good. And this is on tricycles. Emma likes the bicycles at the
store, and there are certainly some that are small enough for her
(she's pretty tall for 3 though). I don't know if she could do the
bikes or not, haven't had the opportunity since she mastered
pedalling.

Mary
OJ - 23 Jun 2004 16:26 GMT
> >Hmm, I'm thinking that the girls started riding their bikes around 2ish.
>
> Are you sure?  Most two year olds can't peddle at all.  The earliest I
> have seen kids peddle is around 3.   And usually that's on tricycles
> not on bicycles.  Do they even make bikes small enough for 2 year olds
> to reach the peddles?

Hi,

My daughter has a little Fisher Price bike with trainers that we got
at Target.  She got it at 1 1/2.  No, she can't peddle although she
can pretty much reach them, but she can sit on the seat and push
herself around.

oj

> >Small bikes of course, but they moved on to bigger bikes and eventually to
> >no training wheels when they were around 6-7 years old. We have always lived
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I think my kids were 6 or 7 when they learned to ride a real bicycle,
> but we didn't do training wheels, iiRC.
Marty Billingsley - 23 Jun 2004 22:57 GMT
>>Hmm, I'm thinking that the girls started riding their bikes around 2ish.
>
>Are you sure?  Most two year olds can't peddle at all.  The earliest I
>have seen kids peddle is around 3.   And usually that's on tricycles
>not on bicycles.  Do they even make bikes small enough for 2 year olds
>to reach the peddles?

My girls were peddling their trikes quite well at two.  At three and a
quarter they are on bikes with training wheels and can manage perfectly
well.  

We mostly go to a playground that is fenced in; trying to keep both
kids safe on a sidewalk right next to a street makes me crazy.

 - marty
   (mom to alex & andie)
Hillary Israeli - 24 Jun 2004 13:05 GMT
*>>Hmm, I'm thinking that the girls started riding their bikes around 2ish.
*>
*>Are you sure?  Most two year olds can't peddle at all.  The earliest I
*>have seen kids peddle is around 3.   And usually that's on tricycles
*>not on bicycles.  Do they even make bikes small enough for 2 year olds
*>to reach the peddles?
*
*My girls were peddling their trikes quite well at two.  At three and a

They sound very entrepreneurial. Congratulations :)

Signature

    hillary israeli vmd  http://www.hillary.net  info@hillary.net
               "uber vaccae in quattuor partes divisum est."
                not-so-newly minted veterinarian-at-large :)

Marty Billingsley - 24 Jun 2004 17:21 GMT
>*>>Hmm, I'm thinking that the girls started riding their bikes around 2ish.
>*>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>They sound very entrepreneurial. Congratulations :)

What makes me crazy is that they like to bike in the house!
:-)

 - marty
   (mom to alex & andie)
Tori M. - 24 Jun 2004 04:49 GMT
> >Hmm, I'm thinking that the girls started riding their bikes around 2ish.
>
> Are you sure?  Most two year olds can't peddle at all.  The earliest I
> have seen kids peddle is around 3.   And usually that's on tricycles
> not on bicycles.  Do they even make bikes small enough for 2 year olds
> to reach the peddles?

My MIL and FIL got my daughter a small bike for her birthday she is now 27
months old and at 10% for hight and she can reach the peddles but can not
peddle it.  It has training wheels on it and she loves to "ride" it but we
keep it in our tiny kitchen  since she has never gotten it to go more then 1
push forward and then back the same distance;)

Tori
Signature

Bonnie 3/20/02
Anna or Xavier due 10/17/04

Jeff - 23 Jun 2004 13:00 GMT
> Hmm, I'm thinking that the girls started riding their bikes around 2ish.
> Small bikes of course, but they moved on to bigger bikes and eventually to
> no training wheels when they were around 6-7 years old. We have always lived
> on a street with sidewalks though and they were allowed to ride up and down
> our steet, with some bounderies at first.

Actually, studies show that kids who ride their bikes on the street rather
than on the side walks are less likely to get injured or killed. If you live
on a quiet residential area, it is probably safer to ride the bikes on the
streets. That way, drivers can see kids more easily when backing out of
their driveways.

Of course, if you live in NYC, the sidewalk is definitely the way to go.

jeff

> Now that they are 11, 9 and 7,
> they are riding around the block and up and down our street and going across
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> >
> > Jeanne
Nikki - 23 Jun 2004 06:30 GMT
> What's a good age to get a real bike (with training wheels)?  My son
> is almost 4, and I'm thinking of getting him a bike for his birthday.
> My main concern is that we live on a hill with a fair bit of traffic,
> so we don't have a great place for him to practice riding without
> going somewhere else.

Depends on the kid ;-)  Hunter couldn't really pedal a real bike very well
until he was 4.  He had gravel is all though.  He could do a trike at 3.5+.
Luke was able to pedal a real bike at 2 (on pavement) and is a speed demon
now at 3.  We had a very small bike with training wheels.  He now rides one
that is to big for him but refuses to get back on the small one.  It is hard
for him to steer the big one because his arms aren't really long enough.
You can get push bars to add to the back so you can control them.  We don't
have sidewalks so up until he a few months ago I tied a rope to Luke's bike
so he wouldn't get away from me.  I'm a cheap skate ;-) That worked good
because then I could pull him when he got tired.  They both spend hours
going up and down our long drive way and don't seem to mind that they never
go anywhere, lol.
--
Nikki
Mama to Hunter (5) and Luke (3)
cara - 23 Jun 2004 07:19 GMT
>What's a good age to get a real bike (with training wheels)?  My son is
>almost 4, and I'm thinking of getting him a bike for his birthday.  My
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Jeanne

My daughter just turned 4 and we got her a bike with training wheels and
she is loving it.  Still figuring out the fine art of slowing down and
stopping which is giving me heart attacks, but its been good for her to
have a motor skills activity for her that she enjoys (she has never been
the best climber or outdoor play type, so we've encouraged things she
expresses interest in like the bike).

Even if you don't live in an area great for biking, its fun to put the
bike in the car and go to a park or area for a picnic and riding time,
makes for a nice outing.  Also in the way of advice, we went to Toys R
us and I had her ride all the bikes to decide which one seemed best
suited for her.  I chose 2 that seemed the best and she chose of the 2
which she liked better.  I was surprised that some of the bikes weren't
a good match for her.

cara
Lil Nicky's Mom - 23 Jun 2004 08:32 GMT
My son's 2.5 and I got him a bike with training wheels already. He's still
learning how to pedal well, but he does way better on a bike than on a
tricycle, which he can't seem to pedal on it at all. I also had one of those
ones with handle, but it wasn't fun for me or my son because he just hates
it when someone interfere when he's trying to do something (ie pedaling). Is
there a park close by that the two of you can walk the bike to?

I think it really depends on the child, that's no "good age" to get a real
bike because each child develops at different rate.
> What's a good age to get a real bike (with training wheels)?  My son is
> almost 4, and I'm thinking of getting him a bike for his birthday.  My
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Jeanne
Hillary Israeli - 23 Jun 2004 13:24 GMT
*What's a good age to get a real bike (with training wheels)?  My son is
*almost 4, and I'm thinking of getting him a bike for his birthday.  My

My son will be 4 in September. We got him a bicycle this spring. He'd
outgrown his tricycle and was asking for one, so, there you go :)

Signature

    hillary israeli vmd  http://www.hillary.net  info@hillary.net
               "uber vaccae in quattuor partes divisum est."
                not-so-newly minted veterinarian-at-large :)

Mary Ann - 23 Jun 2004 13:54 GMT
> What's a good age to get a real bike (with training wheels)?  My son is
> almost 4, and I'm thinking of getting him a bike for his birthday.  My
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Jeanne

Hi,
It really depends on the child. If he is already confident using a
pedal tricycle then he'll be fine on a small bike. To start with he'll
be biking at the same places you currently go for him to play outside.
If he hasn't ridden something with pedals yet I'd get him a trike (or
borrow one) to practice. A child seems awfully high up on a bike to
start with, training wheels or not.

If it's something you're not going to be using much, again I would opt
for a trike that he'll feel more confident on and will be able to use
for a couple of years still.

My son got his bike when he was 3, learnt to ride without the wheels
at 4 and is now confident enough to cycle a bit ahead of us on
pavements (sidewalks).
We have lots of places for him to cycle where we live so he gets alot
of use out of it, but it will be a few years before he's out without a
parent.

Mary Ann
Ericka Kammerer - 23 Jun 2004 14:01 GMT
> What's a good age to get a real bike (with training wheels)?  My son is
> almost 4, and I'm thinking of getting him a bike for his birthday.  My
> main concern is that we live on a hill with a fair bit of traffic, so we
> don't have a great place for him to practice riding without going
> somewhere else.

    My kids started that young (or younger), but
we also live in a situation where there isn't a great
place for them to ride.  My recommendation is that if
it's going to be a hassle to ride, don't even start
with a bike.  There'll be time to learn to ride
later.  In our case, the upshot was that they could
only ride with a parent right with them.  They soon
got to the point where it wasn't any fun because
who wants to just ride up and down the same little
stretch all the time?  They could only *really* have
fun riding if we, say, took them out on the bike
trails.  Doing that frequently wasn't working out,
given all the other things they wanted to do, so
the bikes didn't get much use at all.  When they
get old enough that they can bike safely in the
neighborhood, *then* I'll be getting them new bikes.
Until then, they've got plenty else to amuse themselves
with.

Best wishes,
Ericka
Claire Petersky - 25 Jun 2004 17:51 GMT
> What's a good age to get a real bike (with training wheels)?  My son is
> almost 4, and I'm thinking of getting him a bike for his birthday.  My
> main concern is that we live on a hill with a fair bit of traffic, so we
> don't have a great place for him to practice riding without going
> somewhere else.

Another possibility is to get a trail-a-bike or similar contraption
(http://www.sheldonbrown.com/harris/trailrcy.html) and go riding
together. Using a trailercycle gives a kid a shorter set of list of
things to deal with -- s/he only has to hang on, and optionally pedal.
Other things, like balancing, and negotiating traffic are then largely
up to the adult captain. This is an excellent intermediate step
between tricycling in the driveway, and riding a bike on the street.
You are also modeling for the kid how to handle yourself sensibly on
the road.

If you weren't in Colorado but around here, I'd sell you our old
Trail-a-bike. Both of my kids have now graduated to tandems. We're
looking at doing Pedal the Pinchot (http://www.pedalthepinchot.com/)
as a family -- that's going to be lots of fun.

Warm Regards,

Claire Petersky

Home of the meditative cyclist:
http://home.earthlink.net/~cpetersky/Welcome.htm
See the books I've set free at:
http://bookcrossing.com/referral/Cpetersky
jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org - 25 Jun 2004 19:31 GMT
Jeanne Clelland writes:

> What's a good age to get a real bike (with training wheels)?  My son
> is almost 4, and I'm thinking of getting him a bike for his
> birthday.  My main concern is that we live on a hill with a fair bit
> of traffic, so we don't have a great place for him to practice
> riding without going somewhere else.

Let him ride a tricycle until he's 5 and then get a bicycle that fits.
Children learn rapidly without training wheels if you take the time
and do not offer any doubt that they can do it.  Training wheels make
an unstable tricycle of any bicycle and leave the child riding on a
tilt to one side.  It does not teach bicycling.  The same people who
find conventional tricycles dangerous because they can fall over in a
turn also believe training wheels are useful.

Jobst Brandt
jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org
Tom Keats - 25 Jun 2004 23:23 GMT
> Jeanne Clelland writes:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Let him ride a tricycle until he's 5 and then get a bicycle that fits.

Maybe it would be best to not even think about getting the kid
a bicycle until he expresses an interest.  He would likely
become interested when he finds that several of his friends
and associates ride.  Kids' peer networks can be an invaluable
source of cycling education for the youngsters, because they
disseminate among themselves what they've learned from their
older cycling mentors.  And they also learn what's cool (and
what isn't), which is part of the fun.  That's how I remember
it, anyway.

Introducing children to cycling as a solitary experience sounds
rather bleak and lonely.  I think they'd derive much more value,
satisfaction and fun when they electively join the ranks of
their cycling friends.

Rather than using a child's age as an indicator of when they
should or could start riding a bicycle, I'd suggest a better
indicator might be when the child is expanding his or her
social horizons among the other neighbourhood kids.  That also
gives them places to ride to, as well as others to ride with.

Of course, all this still leaves Jeanne Clelland's concerns
about her local hill and traffic unaddressed.  Off the top
of my head, the only suggestion I can think of is moving to
a more bicycle-friendly (and thereby, child-friendly) area.
Or, just hope the kid doesn't want to ride.

cheers,
    Tom

Signature

--   Powered by FreeBSD
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

Jeanne Clelland - 26 Jun 2004 04:14 GMT
> Another possibility is to get a trail-a-bike or similar contraption
> (http://www.sheldonbrown.com/harris/trailrcy.html) and go riding
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> You are also modeling for the kid how to handle yourself sensibly on
> the road.

I thought about that - I've seen several around here, and they look
really cool - but they're SOOO expensive!  Maybe I could find a used
one...

Jeanne
Peter Cole - 26 Jun 2004 12:28 GMT
> > Another possibility is to get a trail-a-bike or similar contraption
> > (http://www.sheldonbrown.com/harris/trailrcy.html) and go riding
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> really cool - but they're SOOO expensive!  Maybe I could find a used
> one...

I thought so too, but in retrospect, it was one of the best purchases I ever
made. 4 1/2 is about the right starting age. If you do a lot of family riding,
the trailer-bike (or tandem) is the only way I know of to let everyone ride
together. My daughter loved ours, rode with me for 5 years, 1,000's of miles,
and wouldn't let me sell it after she outgrew it last year. A child should
have their own bike too (I know, more expense), they're really 2 separate
issues. Used kids bikes are easy to come by, trailer-bikes are much harder, I
had many people offer to buy mine while we were still riding it, so a lot of
people seem to be looking to reduce the costs. Looking back at it now, it was
a very worthwhile investment, if I resold it, it would only be more so.
Leo Lichtman - 26 Jun 2004 22:59 GMT
The discussion on teaching a child to ride has included some rather strong
views on the value (or lack thereof) of training wheels.  I must say, every
time I see a little kid struggling with a training wheel setup, I feel sorry
for him/her.  It doesn't really handle like a bike, and I think the odd way
the bike must feel really interferes with proper riding. This has led me to
an idea that may solve the problem, and satisfy both sides of the argument,
as well as the child.

Suppose the training wheels, instead of being rigidly constructed, contained
hinges, or pivots, and were supported by a spring/shock absorber type
diagonal brace.  As the kid rides, he/she gets training wheel type support.
In the early stages of learning, the springs can be adjusted at a stiff
setting, and this can be backed off gradually as the kid gains learns to
balance and gains confidence, until, voila, the the wheels are doing
nothing, and are no longer needed.

I would build this if I had any small kids, or if I wanted to get rich in
the bicycle accessory business :-), but for now, I would like to know if the
rest of you think the idea is any good.  Maybe it's already been tried.
Tom Keats - 27 Jun 2004 05:17 GMT
> Suppose the training wheels, instead of being rigidly constructed, contained
> hinges, or pivots, and were supported by a spring/shock absorber type
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> balance and gains confidence, until, voila, the the wheels are doing
> nothing, and are no longer needed.

I don't know.  I'm wondering if this would just give the kid
strange sensory inputs as he or she learns to counter-balance
and steer as the bike leans one way or the other?

The traditional method of incrementally raising conventional
training wheels is a lot simpler, and I think a child would
get more of a feel for /really/ balancing an unencumbered
bicycle.  Conventional training wheels are there to prevent
the bike from leaning too far over anyway.  And fewer moving
parts means fewer things to break (simplicity means reliability.)

It's an interesting idea, though.  Maybe it could be
adapted and applied in some other way, like perhaps
suspension systems for tippier adult tricycle configs.

cheers,
    Tom

Signature

--   Powered by FreeBSD
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

mark - 27 Jun 2004 08:36 GMT
> > What's a good age to get a real bike (with training wheels)?  My son is
> > almost 4, and I'm thinking of getting him a bike for his birthday.  My
> > main concern is that we live on a hill with a fair bit of traffic, so we
> > don't have a great place for him to practice riding without going
> > somewhere else.
I dimly remember being on a bike without training wheels at about age 4, I
may have had some kind of scooter before that.

Friends of mine have a 3 yr old who is having an absolute ball on a bike
with 16" wheels and training wheels- the parents and I agree that the
training wheels are somewhat of a crutch, but they haven't gotten around to
taking them off. I've described to them the method suggested on this NG and
others (pedals off, seat fully lowered, let the kid push off with his feet
until he learns to balance on two wheels), and I may bring a pedal wrench
the next time I see them, just to see what happens. If I do, I'll post a
report on this NG.

Helen's link to a wooden bicycle is interesting, the bikes look really well
made and nicely thought out, but GBP125 / US$225 is an awful lot of money
for a 3 or 4 year old's bike.
--
mark
Bruce Frech - 29 Jun 2004 11:59 GMT
Training wheels are for the parents - they need them to feel safe.  Kids
don't need them.  If they have the balance to walk & run then they have the
balance to ride a bike.

The real question is do they have the perception, comprehension and
reasoning to understand braking and when to use it.  I hear coaster brakes
(or any brakes controled by the feet) are easier to use by the youngest.
Anyone have info on this?

Bruce
Jørn Dahl-Stamnes - 30 Jun 2004 08:20 GMT
>> What's a good age to get a real bike (with training wheels)?  My son is
>> almost 4, and I'm thinking of getting him a bike for his birthday.  My
>> main concern is that we live on a hill with a fair bit of traffic, so we
>> don't have a great place for him to practice riding without going
>> somewhere else.

Depend. My daughter got a bike when she was 5 year. And no training wheels. I
placed a long rod behind the seat and ran after her learning her how to ride
the bike. After 1 hour I could let her ride on her own. Today, she is ride the
bike with much better skill than other girls at the same age.

So drop the training wheels and let your son learn how to ride the bike as it
should be ridden. Training wheels are no-no...

I'm doing the same with my son now, but he seem to need more time to learn how
to ride the bike. There is so many other things that he want to do when we are
training, so he need more time to learn how to ride a bike.

--
Jørn Dahl-Stamnes
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.