Teaching table manners
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Kim E - 24 Jul 2005 21:39 GMT Hi, I have posted here in the past, but otherwise usually lurk. I have a question that is not for me, but for a friend (no really :) My DS is only 1 so I have no idea about teaching table manners to older children.
My friend has a 9 yr old son whose table manners are atrocious according to her. Apparantly he likes to use his fingers when he should use cutlery, doesn't use his napkin, likes to get out of his seat during meals, and chews quite loudly. The reason I am trying to get advice on her behalf is that she was complaing to me how frustrating this is for her and how she has nagged him about this for 2 years and nothing has changed. Obviously I know that nagging anyone about anything is not an effective way to get change, but I couldn't figure out how you do teach table manners. I suggested being positive and expecting him to learn manners, rather than being negative, and to work on one thing at a time. But has anyone had to take further steps in teaching table manners to reluctant learners? What kind of consequences would be appropriate if the child still refuses to be polite at the table?
Thanks in advance!
-kim
Nan - 24 Jul 2005 22:14 GMT >My friend has a 9 yr old son whose table manners are atrocious >according to her. Apparantly he likes to use his fingers when he [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >being positive and expecting him to learn manners, rather than >being negative, and to work on one thing at a time. Personally, I think modeling the behavior you want is the best method of teaching to young children.... but this pretty much applies to much younger than the age of 9, imo.
> But has >anyone had to take further steps in teaching table manners to >reluctant learners? What kind of consequences would be >appropriate if the child still refuses to be polite at the table? If I felt my 9 year old was flat-out refusing to be polite, then my consequence would be that meal time is over for him.
Nan
Kim E - 25 Jul 2005 01:18 GMT > On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:39:44 -0400, "Kim E" > <aqa12nospam@yahoo.com> [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > much > younger than the age of 9, imo. She does and has modeled appropriate table manners.
>> But has >>anyone had to take further steps in teaching table manners to [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > my > consequence would be that meal time is over for him. That's what I was thinking but didn't know if it was too mean :) So what if the child hardly ate anything for dinner before dinner was over due to innappropriate behavior. Should that be it to eat for the night, or do you think it would be ok to offer a healthful snack later, expecting the same proper table manners for the snack? This boy is quite thin already despite eating tons of food.
-kim
dragonlady - 25 Jul 2005 02:25 GMT > >> But has > >>anyone had to take further steps in teaching table manners to [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > snack later, expecting the same proper table manners for the snack? > This boy is quite thin already despite eating tons of food. If he's underweight, or malnourished, it might make a difference in terms of what I'd offer later -- but NOT what I'd offer during the meal itself.
But it would have to be pretty serious: even if he's very thin, going one evening without food won't hurt him, and might get his attention in a way that nothing else would.
On the other hand, I'd probably make certain he'd had a good lunch and afternoon snack each day.
 Signature Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care
Kim E - 25 Jul 2005 03:03 GMT > "Kim E" <aqa12nospam@yahoo.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > the meal > itself. Nah, he's not malnourished, just very active and thin.
> But it would have to be pretty serious: even if he's very thin, > going > one evening without food won't hurt him, and might get his > attention in > a way that nothing else would. Right, this seems to be the consensus. He is quite the rule tester though, and it might take several days for him to get with the program.
> On the other hand, I'd probably make certain he'd had a good > lunch and > afternoon snack each day. Right, makes sense. Pre-emptive nutrition. :)
-kim
Nan - 25 Jul 2005 03:34 GMT >She does and has modeled appropriate table manners. I figured as much. I was just pointing it out as what to do with younger kids :-)
>That's what I was thinking but didn't know if it was too mean :) >So what if the child hardly ate anything for dinner before dinner >was over due to innappropriate behavior. Should that be it to eat >for the night, or do you think it would be ok to offer a healthful >snack later, expecting the same proper table manners for the snack? >This boy is quite thin already despite eating tons of food. It may seem mean, but I certainly don't think it is. Sometimes harder measures need to be taken to get their attention.
I likely wouldn't go so far as to deny food the rest of the evening, but I wouldn't allow treats or dessert, either. Perhaps something like fruit or even leftovers from the meal.
Nan
Ericka Kammerer - 24 Jul 2005 22:18 GMT > My friend has a 9 yr old son whose table manners are atrocious > according to her. Apparantly he likes to use his fingers when he [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > reluctant learners? What kind of consequences would be > appropriate if the child still refuses to be polite at the table? Honestly, I'm willing to do a lot of things if I think the child is trying, but I'm not particularly going to bend over backwards to find positive methods for a child who knows what to do but isn't interested in trying. If I had a 9yo who refused to attempt reasonable table manners, it would mean:
1) No restaurants. 2) No having friends over for meals. 3) No meal related privileges. 4) If it were in-your-face enough, he'd be asked to leave the table.
If it's just a matter of inattention rather than refusal, you can do lots of things like establish a rule for the night to focus on, or set up a game where you win something for catching others breaking the rules (you can increase the number of operative rules over time). Obviously, it's very important that adults at the table set a good example. I assume she's already had discussions with him about how his behavior will be a major turnoff and embarrassment to his friends, especially as he gets older. There are some books about this:
http://tinyurl.com/cbeym http://tinyurl.com/bwzt2
Ultimately, though, with a 9yo she's nagged for 2 years with no results, I rather suspect she's going to have to back up her requests with some consequences in order to effect any changes. It seems a reasonable logical consequence that those who refuse to make themselves pleasant to eat with don't get to eat with others.
Best wishes, Ericka
Kim E - 25 Jul 2005 01:25 GMT >> My friend has a 9 yr old son whose table manners are atrocious >> according to her. Apparantly he likes to use his fingers when [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > to bend over backwards to find positive methods for a child > who knows what to do but isn't interested in trying. By positive I just meant eliminating negative communication like nagging and insulting the child for his rude behaviors. I didn't mean sugar coating the message that manners are expected, just to deliver the message matter of factly.
If I
> had a 9yo who refused to attempt reasonable table manners, > it would mean: [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > 4) If it were in-your-face enough, he'd be asked to leave > the table. The no restaurants would be tough as she is a single mom and that would mean no restaurants also for the 10 yr old brother whose manners are fine. What do you consider "meal-related" priviliges? I think suggestion #4 will work the best for them.
> If it's just a matter of inattention rather than refusal, > you can do lots of things like establish a rule for the [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > http://tinyurl.com/cbeym > http://tinyurl.com/bwzt2 Thanks for the links, you always give great book suggestions!
> Ultimately, though, with a 9yo she's nagged for 2 years > with no results, I rather suspect she's going to have to > back up her requests with some consequences in order to > effect any changes. It seems a reasonable logical > consequence that those who refuse to make themselves > pleasant to eat with don't get to eat with others. That was also one of my suggestions to her - to have him eat at a separate table, but then I thought that might be actually accomodating his behaviors. I also think she will have to implement consequences, and I think letting him know he will be asked to leave the table if he continues his rudeness will do the trick.
Thanks for your input!
-kim
Ericka Kammerer - 25 Jul 2005 01:49 GMT > If I > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > would mean no restaurants also for the 10 yr old brother whose > manners are fine. Oh, I would probably decide to bite the bullet and take a stand for, say, a month (which is probably all it would take). I'd continue going out to eat with the brother, but I'd get a sitter for the other ;-) That might be pricy, though I bet at that age you could work something out with a friend's parent where you'd feed him a boring meal at home and then send him off on a playdate after the other family had eaten while taking the brother out to dinner. It's *much* more effective to deny him the right to go out to eat when the rest of the family carries on eating out as they please ;-) Otherwise, you run the risk that he can use his poor manners as a weapon to deny the rest of the family the privilege of going out.
> What do you consider "meal-related" priviliges? Oh, dessert or getting to pick the menu or that sort of thing.
>>Ultimately, though, with a 9yo she's nagged for 2 years >>with no results, I rather suspect she's going to have to [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > asked to leave the table if he continues his rudeness will do the > trick. I wouldn't have him at a separate table--he'd just be done with dinner ;-) I wouldn't use that for minor infractions, but a willful disregard for meeting appropriate standards would mean he'd go to bed hungry. A couple hungry nights won't kill him, and he can resolve the issue as soon as he decides he wants to. The key is that she *has* to be prepared to follow through on it. You explain it in advance, give one warning, and then you follow through. Odds are, the first time she does it, he will back down as soon as she sends him away, wailing that he'll starve and promising that he'll be good and so on. If she lets him back at the table, he'll simply have learned that he can push it until she orders him away from the table, and she'll start a pattern of threats and backing down that will continue day after day. Better one hungry night than that. Then, the next night he will stop short of whatever got him sent away the night before (unless he's really stubborn, in which case he may test it for a few nights). The concession I *would* make is that I'd make sure he got good breakfasts, lunches, and afternoon snacks. He'd be hungry if he decided to make a stand, but not starving.
Best wishes, Ericka
Kim E - 25 Jul 2005 03:00 GMT >> What do you consider "meal-related" priviliges? > [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > and afternoon snacks. He'd be hungry if he decided > to make a stand, but not starving. That makes sense. At first I though that not giving him dinner was too harsh, but she will give him dinner, it will be up to him to decide whether it is more important to eat it or to act up. And I totally agree with you about the consistency. Although I do not have children of that age, I did teach for a while and consistency is just as important there. Anyway, I will pass this advice along to her and hope she tries it.
Thanks again.
-kim
Catherine Woodgold - 25 Jul 2005 17:21 GMT >> The concession I *would* make is >> that I'd make sure he got good breakfasts, lunches, >> and afternoon snacks. He'd be hungry if he decided >> to make a stand, but not starving. Wait. She had better try a number of positive methods before trying punishment. Once she starts on punishment she'll have set up a me-versus-you feeling and it may not be possible to go back. It might work; but it might escalate into him getting into all sorts of other terrible behaviour (punishing her for punishing him). It might not be worth it. And if she's going to try punishment: I'd suggest some much milder punishment, at least at first, than suddenly sending him to bed hungry for acting just the way he's been acting for years. For example, instead of going to bed hungry maybe he just has to walk into the kitchen to get his food rather than having it served to him.
Positive methods: see books such as "Discpline that Works" by Thomas Gordon; "The Virtues Guide"; "Positive Discipline for Teenagers", etc.
If she's going to use punishment, I suggest reading "Setting Limits" by R. Mackenzie first; it tells how to use punishment in more effective ways so you don't end up using big punishment very often.
One thing she might try: ignore the bad table manners. Stop nagging. But say positive things about what the child is doing right. Apparently the child has made a lot of progress in other behaviour issues in recent years; she can focus on that, and try to say lots of nice things to him. After a while he might decide to improve his table manners because he wants to please her or because he thinks of himself as a person who is good and capable of improving. But it may take time to recover from the years of nagging. -- Cathy Woodgold http://www.ncf.ca/~an588/par_home.html We are all Iraqis now.
dragonlady - 25 Jul 2005 00:03 GMT > Hi, I have posted here in the past, but otherwise usually lurk. I > have a question that is not for me, but for a friend (no really :) [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > -kim If she didn't start expecting decent table manners until he was 7, it WILL be a problem to teach.
I think the most important thing is to sit down to at least one meal a day as a family, and to both display and expect decent table manners at that time. Keep conversation pleasant. Talk about the need to develop "company manners" that will make him an acceptable person to take out in public. Perhaps even tell him you're taking him to a fancy restaurant, and he needs to practice -- then, after he's doing well for a while, actually GO to a fancy (I know, expensive) restaurant.
FWIW, I didn't think I was particularly concentrating on table manners, but just expected basic civilized dining at dinner every evening. My kids have regularly been complemented on their lovely table manners (which, frankly, tells me that our current standards must be really low! They're good, but not exceptional.)
 Signature Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care
Kim E - 25 Jul 2005 01:30 GMT > "Kim E" <aqa12nospam@yahoo.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] >> appropriate if the child still refuses to be polite at the >> table?
> If she didn't start expecting decent table manners until he was > 7, it > WILL be a problem to teach. To be fair to her, she adopted him from the foster system when he was 5 and for the first few years he had other much more pressing behavioral issues to get under control. I don't think the rude table manners were even a blip on her radar for a while.
> I think the most important thing is to sit down to at least one > meal a [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > while, > actually GO to a fancy (I know, expensive) restaurant. They do have dinner together every evening so that's good. I think she may have started out this way, but when he didn't go along with the program, instead of instituting consequences she fell into nagging which he ignores.
> FWIW, I didn't think I was particularly concentrating on table > manners, [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > really low! > They're good, but not exceptional.) I hope that's how it will be with my DS! That is, as soon as he is done with his throwing food from his high chair phase :)
Thanks!
-kim
dragonlady - 25 Jul 2005 02:21 GMT > > If she didn't start expecting decent table manners until he was > > 7, it [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > behavioral issues to get under control. I don't think the rude > table manners were even a blip on her radar for a while. Ah. That makes a huge difference.
However, if they have dinner together (or at least one meal a day) and model appropriate table manners, I still think that eventually, he'll catch on.
 Signature Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care
dejablues - 25 Jul 2005 03:21 GMT > Hi, I have posted here in the past, but otherwise usually lurk. I > have a question that is not for me, but for a friend (no really :) [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > -kim Raising young males to have good table manners is a serious struggle. It's just not in their nature - they fail to see why it matters. I'm not being sexist, I grew up with three brothers and I really think that table manners are a lot more important to females. DH was sent away to boarding school at a young age , and had no real instruction, so we were working uphill here. We have three sons, they are almost 16, 12, and 7.5. We have a family dinner every night , no matter how late it is. For us, it's a matter if constant reminders - kid uses his shirt to wipe his face, we say "use your napkin". Kid picks up peas with his fingers, we say "use the fork". Kid leaves table without clearing his plate, we bring him back and tell him to do so. Praise , hug , and smile when they use manners. The older two are fine, but the youngest still needs some reminders. I hate to have the dinner hour be a source of conflict, so it's just a comment to remind them, no nagging, punishing, or making them leave the table. The last thing you want is a war surrounding mealtime. Repeat, repeat, repeat. No nagging, punishing, yelling. Just keep modeling the behavior, gently correcting the behavior you don't want, and praising the behavior you do want. I must add that, when we are out in public, at a restaurant, wedding reception, family dinner, they have always been great.
Kim E - 25 Jul 2005 03:30 GMT >> Hi, I have posted here in the past, but otherwise usually lurk. >> I [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] > praising > the behavior you do want. I know exactly what you mean about males and table manners. I haven't completely trained my DH yet! ;)
I thought constant reminding sort of was nagging. Well, I could see that with overall compliant children, gentle reminders could work, but I think with strong-willed children, a gentle reminder is like an invitation to test the seriousness of the rule.
-kim
> I must add that, when we are out in public, at a restaurant, > wedding > reception, family dinner, they have always been great. Chookie - 27 Jul 2005 13:32 GMT > My friend has a 9 yr old son whose table manners are atrocious > according to her. Apparantly he likes to use his fingers when he [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > anyone about anything is not an effective way to get change, but I > couldn't figure out how you do teach table manners. It seems he has a number of problems and is not just trying it on with her. I think she should discuss it with the psychologist that he is seeing. For example, he may have coordination problems that make using a knife and fork difficult, so he tries to avoid cutlery.
Some things are just habit. If he's leaving the table without wiping his face, she could just say, "Napkin!" (per Faber & Mazlish).
Other things are more easily taught -- how to hold a knife and fork properly, for example (she may need to recheck that he *can* hold them properly); how to use chopsticks, the proper way to eat soup, etc. Example is, of course, a great teacher, but sometimes the student hasn't *noticed* the example.
Lastly, a suggestion from my own upbringing which gave me the ability to manage at formal dinners:
The birthday girl always chose her birthday meal and we ate it in the dining room rather than the eat-in kitchen. These meals were 2-3 courses, and were set properly for the meal, and used the "good" china and glassware (once we were old enough). I can't remember not knowing that your cutlery goes from the outside in, bread plate and serviette to the left, etc. An ordinary family dinner doesn't teach you about three-course cutlery placement.
I've mentioned it here before, but when I was in my 20s I was often surprised by people whispering to me at wedding receptions that they weren't sure which fork to use. Then there were the ones who kept picking up my serviette in restaurants, instead of taking the one to their left. All well-brought-up middle-class people who had NOT spent half their lives in Mcdonald's! I still don't get it, but I know I didn't make those errors because I'd been taught through our birthday dinners.
 Signature Chookie -- Sydney, Australia (Replace "foulspambegone" with "optushome" to reply)
"In Melbourne there is plenty of vigour and eagerness, but there is nothing worth being eager or vigorous about." Francis Adams, The Australians, 1893.
Kim E - 27 Jul 2005 20:24 GMT >> My friend has a 9 yr old son whose table manners are atrocious >> according to her. Apparantly he likes to use his fingers when [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > knife and fork > difficult, so he tries to avoid cutlery. He does have other problems, but they are behavioral, not physical like coordination.
> Some things are just habit. If he's leaving the table without > wiping his [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > great teacher, but sometimes the student hasn't *noticed* the > example. That's a good point. I think my friend is assuming that he is just being defiant, which is likely, but she could make sure he knows how to hold the cutlery.
> Lastly, a suggestion from my own upbringing which gave me the > ability to [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > been taught > through our birthday dinners. Interesting point and that is a good idea to teach the table manners that you don't use everyday. Now that I think about it, at the last wedding I attended, my 50+ yr old uncle grabbed my water glass, and I do recall having to explain table settings to people on several occasions due to people asking me if which glass/knife etc was theirs. I was not taught at home how to set a formal table or which cutlery to use for what. I might not know it now had I not worked in a country club as a teenager. From dinners at my friends houses, they did not focus on those kinds of table manners either. Interesting. I will make sure I teach my DS which fork to use! :)
-kim
Ericka Kammerer - 27 Jul 2005 20:47 GMT > Interesting point and that is a good idea to teach the table > manners that you don't use everyday. Now that I think about it, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > table manners either. Interesting. I will make sure I teach my > DS which fork to use! :) I find this interesting. Even though we do not eat formally every night, we do set the table properly most nights, and we teach the kids the usual stuff--where the flatware goes, which side the glass goes on, etc. I thought everyone did that.
Best wishes, Ericka
dragonlady - 27 Jul 2005 21:11 GMT > > Interesting point and that is a good idea to teach the table > > manners that you don't use everyday. Now that I think about it, [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Best wishes, > Ericka DH didn't know that stuff -- I had to teach him.
If he sets the table, unless we're having company, Lord knows where stuff will end up! He finds the entire thing faintly ridiculous. Nevertheless, my kids have been taught how to do it right, and so has he.
 Signature Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care
Chookie - 31 Jul 2005 12:01 GMT > I find this interesting. Even though we do not eat > formally every night, we do set the table properly most nights, > and we teach the kids the usual stuff--where the flatware goes, > which side the glass goes on, etc. I thought everyone did that. These would be the same 'everyone' who don't put registry information in invitations, right? Or keep the TV on when they have guests? :-)
I have a friend who claims her parents never taught her to use a knife and fork; she eats left-handed as a result. My own DH was never taught hand-shaking etiquette. I remember feeling embarrassed when he didn't stand up when introduced to an older gentleman. What's interesting is that I lived in an all-female household most of the time, only saw Dad on weekends, yet somehow had absorbed Dad's behaviour at such moments.
 Signature Chookie -- Sydney, Australia (Replace "foulspambegone" with "optushome" to reply)
"In Melbourne there is plenty of vigour and eagerness, but there is nothing worth being eager or vigorous about." Francis Adams, The Australians, 1893.
|
|
|