>>>>> "Jessica M. Seymour" <diet18@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:cebbb538-8a47-4f33-b00f-b5c3efb3de11@b9g2000prh.google
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>It depends what you are eating. You just plain cannot eat enough kale,
>spinach, green beans... to be problematic.
>>>>>> "Jessica M. Seymour" <diet18@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>> news:cebbb538-8a47-4f33-b00f-b5c3efb3de11@b9g2000prh.google
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> The other thing is - sure, you can eat all the carrots you want,
Not carrots.
> but there's
> only so much carrots, or kale, etc. etc. that people are actually going to
> eat
> sustainably. Really, how many people are going to, day after day, eat
> mounds
> and mounds of plain kale to stave off what they percieve as hunger?
For me, it is finding the right foods to eat. (I don't care all that much
how many people do what or what other people do.) But I do strongly beleive
(since I am doing it) that one can eat large quantities of food, completely
avoid hunger, and loose weight. For example lunch today was 3 oz boneless
chicken, 2/3 cup chopped tomato, 1 cup asparagus, 1/4 cup cannelini beans
cooked in 1 teaspoon olive oil. That is a pretty gargantuan plate of food,
let me tell you. (I did season it with morrocon spice. There are a million
freebee flavor combos that are yummy.) So as far as I am concerned "portion
control" does not describe the one and only, or even the best way to manage
your diet.
> So people go and look for some other panacea recipe where they can lose
> weight
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> one
> wanted).
Oh sure. I don't care that much about the psychology of dieting. I was
merely disagreeing with the simplicity of "portion control." No one is going
to change habits for life if they are controlling their portions of not very
good food, and as a result being hungry and loopy headed all the time. That
is what happens if you control the portions of foods that are not
particularly beneficial, at least that is what happened to me. I lost a boat
load. Felt like crap too!
> Maybe there can be a sidebar about how any amount of *undressed* veges of
> certain veges is OK. But the MAIN thing still comes down to - portion
> control.
I disgree. Calorie control. Sure. Portion control. No.
> Getting used to not eating past satiety, getting used to what satiation
> even
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Banty
Stephanie - 30 May 2008 20:57 GMT
>> Maybe there can be a sidebar about how any amount of *undressed* veges of
>> certain veges is OK. But the MAIN thing still comes down to - portion
>> control.
>
> I disgree. Calorie control. Sure. Portion control. No.
Calorie control and managing/balancing the digestive hormones. Sorry.
Banty - 30 May 2008 21:52 GMT
>>>>>>> "Jessica M. Seymour" <diet18@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:cebbb538-8a47-4f33-b00f-b5c3efb3de11@b9g2000prh.google
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>control" does not describe the one and only, or even the best way to manage
>your diet.
Well, OK, one can make a big mound of stuff and spice it with no fat containing
material. But what you just described is quite different from what most people
eat, and recall that most people live in families that need to figure out some
way to get everyone else to eat it too.
What do you do when you go out? Ask for asparagus and cannelini beans and
demand "a la Morroco"? Well, OK, there are a lot of meat salads if one lays
completely with the dressing.
But I betcha you're not doing asparagus and grazing on potato chips in the
afternoon and making sure you bring bearclaws to the morning meeting. A lot of
this has to do with sustainable changes in daily habit.
Banty
Banty - 30 May 2008 21:56 GMT
>>>>>>>> "Jessica M. Seymour" <diet18@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:cebbb538-8a47-4f33-b00f-b5c3efb3de11@b9g2000prh.google
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>>control" does not describe the one and only, or even the best way to manage
>>your diet.
On second thought, looking at all the amounts, clearly you *are* using portion
control (else you coudln't have posted that!), just managing to make a big
looking pile with lots of roughage.
Banty