Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Marriage / Marriage / May 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

True or False? "It's called marriage"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ddnoe@bellsouth.net - 27 May 2006 00:27 GMT
I just read a letter that went something like this: "You report that
the latest fad in living arrangements is for the man to provide housing
in exchange for the woman cooking and cleaning, no sex involved. This
has been around for quite some time. It's called marriage."
Is this true or false?
Good or bad?
Jack C Lipton - 27 May 2006 01:14 GMT
ddnoe wrote:
> I just read a letter that went something
> like this: "You report that the latest
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> involved. This has been around for quite
> some time. It's called marriage."

A long time ago in a cafeteria far, far away
I teased some co-workers.

There were three of us at the table, all
married men with at least 10 years into the
relationship.  A younger fellow comes over
and sits down and eventually he looks at us
with a serious look on his face and said:

"You're all married for a long time.  I've
been thinking about getting married.  You
get more 'play', right?"

All three of us stared at him like he had
just grown a second head.  I was the first
to speak, though, saying "No, that's not a
good reason to get married because that's
not how it ends up working."

The other two were nodding.

The young fellow asked "What do you mean?"

I sighed.  "Z, you know about that research
that says that men fantasize about having
sex every couple of minutes, right?"

He nodded, acknowledging that.

I then added "Well, women fantasize about
NOT having sex."

The other two married men are looking at
me, one is nodding and the other comments
"C'mon, Jack, that's not all of it, is it?"

A mental lightning bolt hit me over how I
could *really* say something funny, so I
grunted and said, as seriously as I could
to rattle his cage, "You're right, Dave.
Y'see, Z, women fantasize about NOT having
sex... and still getting work out of their
husbands."

This time both of the two married men did
smile and give me a thumb's up, with one
telling me "Nailed it" then turned to the
youngster and, rubbing it in, said "That
make sense to you?"

And to think we hadn't rehearsed this.

In subsequent lunch-time discussions he
never brought up the subject of marriage
again.

I know, really, that it's bullshit, y'know?
Because, really, it's not *always* true...
and really only represents one end of the
bell curve.

That being said, somehow I doubt that there
are many men who believe they get enough
(or "more than enough") sexual attention
from their spouse, but, then, it may be in
the nature of the beast.

So, really, it's likely more a matter of
"subjective perception" influencing one's
perception of the sexual aspect of their
marriage based upon how one feels.

How's that for a non-answer?

Hopefully someone got a laugh out of the
little discussion I described above.

Signature

Jack C Lipton | cupasoup at pele dot cx | http://www.asstr.org/~CupaSoup/
            "HMOs:  saving money one DOA at a time." - me
   "When a unified theory of human personality is finally published
    it will consist entirely of exceptions" - me

Doug Anderson - 27 May 2006 01:36 GMT
(snip story about "sex ends after marriage")

> And to think we hadn't rehearsed this.

Well, it is rehearsed constantly in populat culture.  You don't really
need to rehearse it any more than people need to rehearse complaining
about the weather or taxes.

> In subsequent lunch-time discussions he
> never brought up the subject of marriage
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> from their spouse, but, then, it may be in
> the nature of the beast.

Enough for what?  

Seriously, your own personal situation seems extreme and a dangerous
one to use as a template.  Also dangerous to use as a template are the
tropes of popular culture.
dejablues - 27 May 2006 05:33 GMT
> I just read a letter that went something like this: "You report that
> the latest fad in living arrangements is for the man to provide housing
> in exchange for the woman cooking and cleaning, no sex involved. This
> has been around for quite some time. It's called marriage."
> Is this true or false?
> Good or bad?

That makes no sense.
wtmuradio@gmail.com - 28 May 2006 04:48 GMT
its bullshit man !!! I feel for ya .I just posted a good one check it
out .Same probs as anyone just about
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.