Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Marriage / Marriage / June 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

summer ruminations

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Zorra - 19 Jun 2006 04:13 GMT
DH's flashes of anger are getting more frequent.  Two days ago he
noticed that the mouse on the kids' computer was "broken."  It's true
that something had happened to the right button, but the left button
seemed to work perfectly fine.  And I have never seen the kids do
anything abusive to their mouse.  I'm confident that whatever happened
to it was an accident.  DH, however, started cussing, and then
actually swung the mouse around by it's cord and smashed it into the
desk and the floor and who knows what.  After that, the left button
was missing altogether, and the mouse was unusable.

Then today he was trying to vacuum up some hamster bedding that my son
spilled, and the small vacuum that we keep upstairs wouldn't suck.
Now, it was running fine, and likely there was just a clog in it, or
the filter needed cleaning.  But again, he went ballistic.  This time
he threw the vacuum, and it ended up hitting me and the dog.

I'm....not exactly scared, but definitely disturbed.  It occurred to
me that with this being the summer, we have the opportunity to just
get out of Dodge for a while.  I could pack up the kids and go live
with my in-laws for a couple of months.  It might be what he needs to
calm down, get a grip, do some thinking, etc.  We couldn't stay with
my folks as they live in a tiny apartment.

Well, I won't actually do it.  I never do, do I?  But damn, I'm
beginning to think it's just a matter of time before I have no choice.

Zorra
Rog' - 19 Jun 2006 04:50 GMT
> DH's flashes of anger are getting more frequent.... DH... started
> cussing, and then actually swung the mouse around by it's cord
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> filter needed cleaning.  But again, he went ballistic.  This time
> he threw the vacuum, and it ended up hitting me and the dog.

Venting one's spleen on occasion is normal, even healthy, but this
guy seems to lack impulse control.  He needs to see a shrink or
do an anger-management program.  It was the real threat of my
1st wife leaving me shortly into our marriage, that figuratively,
woke me up and got us into marriage counseling.  But if you issue
an ultimatum, be prepared to make good on on the threats or they
will be treated with disdain.  =R=
Kitty - 19 Jun 2006 04:51 GMT
>DH's flashes of anger are getting more frequent.  Two days ago he
>noticed that the mouse on the kids' computer was "broken."  It's true
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>Well, I won't actually do it.  I never do, do I?  But damn, I'm
>beginning to think it's just a matter of time before I have no choice.

Ouch :(
I'm sorry it's escalated.
I'm glad you're on alert, looking at this critically from the
perspective of protecting yourself and the kids.
Grace - 19 Jun 2006 05:39 GMT
> Well, I won't actually do it.  I never do, do I?  But damn, I'm
> beginning to think it's just a matter of time before I have no choice.

All i can say, Zorra, is hope for the best and make extensive
contingeny planning for the worst.

Grace
very sorry to hear this.
Amy Lou - 19 Jun 2006 07:58 GMT
> Well, I won't actually do it.  I never do, do I?  But damn, I'm beginning
> to think it's just a matter of time before I have no choice.

Yep, eventually you will reach a point where you know you will have to do
something.  You didn't mention and I'm curious as to what your reactions to
the mouse twirling incident and the vacuum throwing incident were? I hope
you expressed total outrage!

Amy
Zorra - 19 Jun 2006 12:08 GMT
>> Well, I won't actually do it.  I never do, do I?  But damn, I'm
>> beginning to think it's just a matter of time before I have no
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> reactions to the mouse twirling incident and the vacuum throwing
> incident were? I hope you expressed total outrage!

Sort of.  I did point out that the mouse was a working mouse until he
smashed it.  And I told him to leave and let me take care of the
hamster bedding, though he didn't.  He never expresses remorse after
these things.  I did actually get him to apologize to DD though, for
something I didn't talk about here.  That's where I generally put my
outrage.

Zorra
DrLith - 19 Jun 2006 13:47 GMT
>>>Well, I won't actually do it.  I never do, do I?  But damn, I'm
>>>beginning to think it's just a matter of time before I have no
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> something I didn't talk about here.  That's where I generally put my
> outrage.

Were your kids in the house at the time? Man, especially if you suspect
ODD in the older one...the last thing they need is to learn that
throwing sh.t around and breaking it is an acceptible way to deal with
frustration. I know you *know* that, but...well, sometimes you live with
something for so long that you lose sight of how far outside "normal"
your reality is.
Zorra - 21 Jun 2006 03:34 GMT
> Were your kids in the house at the time?

They were asleep when he bashed the mouse, but my son was in the room
when he threw the vacuum.

> Man, especially if you suspect ODD in the older one...
> the last thing they need is to learn that throwing sh.t around and
> breaking it is an acceptible way to deal with frustration. I know
> you *know* that, but...well, sometimes you live with something for
> so long that you lose sight of how far outside "normal" your reality
> is.

Speaking of her....

I have decided who to take her to and discovered that he doesn't take
our insurance (of course), but I haven't made the appointment yet.
Mostly because things are crazy busy right now.

But I was thinking today about how much things have changed in the
last year.  DH and I are taking turns volunteering at scout camp, and
she stays in the sibling area.  I picked her up today, and the
counselor said, "We didn't have a good day today.  She was
uncooperative and bickering with the other kids and the adults too."
I just said, "I'm sorry."  So now I have a conundrum.  I don't know
whether to send her back there tomorrow, or to take her to work with
me.  I don't really think it's fair for them to have to deal with her,
and I'm frankly scared of what will happen with her and DH.  If she
starts up, he just escalates it.  He wouldn't be with her except at
lunch and at the closing ceremony, but it doesn't take much.  Last
weekend he took her to the driving range, and I'm unclear on what
happened, except that it wasn't pleasant.  I told him that he needs to
remember that it's not about "winning", it's about getting her under
control.  His response was, "I don't care about winning, I just don't
want to look like a fool!"  And I said, "It's not about whether or not
you look like a fool either, it's about doing what is best for her."
What he doesn't realize is that *she* can't really make him look like
a fool, but he sure makes himself look that way when he explodes at
her in public.

So, anyway, sending her there tomorrow is a big risk and not likely to
be a good thing, but if I take her into my work and she starts up,
then what?  My boss is there, my coworkers are there.  At least at
camp there are other kids to play with.  At work there is *nothing*
for her to do.

Anyway, year ago at this time, I didn't have these worries.  She did
fine all four days at camp.  She loved it in fact.

Zorra
DrLith - 21 Jun 2006 04:16 GMT
>>Were your kids in the house at the time?
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> our insurance (of course), but I haven't made the appointment yet.
> Mostly because things are crazy busy right now.

I hear ya there. We apparently have the crappiest insurance on the
planet when it comes to mental health choices and have had to learn the
ropes fast. It's been our experience that when you try to intersect the
set of "providers recommended by reliable people" and "providers listed
on my insurance plan," the union of those two sets will be at best one
or two people, and neither of them will return your phone calls.

> But I was thinking today about how much things have changed in the
> last year.  DH and I are taking turns volunteering at scout camp, and
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Anyway, year ago at this time, I didn't have these worries.  She did
> fine all four days at camp.  She loved it in fact.

Yeah, I've felt like ironically, DS11's behavior has regressed a lot in
the past year, to where he is routinely acting embarrassingly
inappropriately if we go to the store, visit friends or family, or just
other routine stuff. I don't know what's behind it; in part it's
frustrating because I feel like I've made big strides in how *I*
interact with him.

Hang in there, and keep looking for all the opportunities you can find
to interact positively, praise and reward her for the days when things
"don't go so badly," because those downward spirals of bad behavior,
unpleasant consequences, surly attitude on part of child, negative
feelings toward child on part of parent--well, they're no fun!

Would it work to have some sort of reward for going to camp as she is
supposed to and interacting appropriately rather than messing up your
day at work?
Amy Lou - 21 Jun 2006 12:05 GMT
>>> Well, I won't actually do it.  I never do, do I?  But damn, I'm
>>> beginning to think it's just a matter of time before I have no choice.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I did actually get him to apologize to DD though, for something I didn't
> talk about here.  That's where I generally put my outrage.

In retrospect do you think you should have reacted to any of these incidents
any differently or do you think your reactions were appropriate? That's good
that you got him to apologise to DD but I'm just wondering if there was more
you could have achieved. Im not trying to criticise, just  wondering if
*you* can see any areas that you can work on improving next time.

Amy
Zorra - 21 Jun 2006 12:53 GMT
>> Sort of.  I did point out that the mouse was a working mouse until
>> he smashed it.  And I told him to leave and let me take care of the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> trying to criticise, just  wondering if *you* can see any areas that
> you can work on improving next time.

Well, no, I don't really.  Or at least I don't think there is anything
different that I could have done to make a different impact.  Maybe I
just don't have the force of personality to pull it off.

Zorra
Amy Lou - 22 Jun 2006 05:47 GMT
> Well, no, I don't really.  Or at least I don't think there is anything
> different that I could have done to make a different impact.  Maybe I just
> don't have the force of personality to pull it off.

I guess what I'm asking is this: was there anything you could have done to
make him *not* behave in this way again? If your answer is no then you need
strategies so you and the kids can get out of the way when the next occation
(and the next and the next) occurs. Perhaps you could all run out into the
yard and stay there for 10 minutes or so?

Amy
Zorra - 23 Jun 2006 05:38 GMT
>> Well, no, I don't really.  Or at least I don't think there is
>> anything different that I could have done to make a different
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Perhaps you could all run out into the yard and stay there for 10
> minutes or so?

I have a friend with an angry husband.  Hers makes mine pale in
comparison, though she's never said anything about throwing or
hitting, only yelling.  Back when DH and I were still good, this guy
would come home yelling and screaming, and on certain days she would
just grab the kids and take them out of the house for a few hours.  He
*did* actually get into counseling, was diagnosed with an anxiety
disorder.  Their marriage counseling focused a lot on things she could
do to help him -- not overschedule the weekends for example.  He even
started on medication.

Yet, his behavior is still escalating.  She went to a neighbor's one
day, stayed longer than he expected, and he called the neighbor in a
rage.  She'd left by that time, but he scared the neighbor so bad that
she told my friend that she was shaking when she got off the phone.

My friend is in the same situation I'm in.  She has a life she really
likes, except for this angry guy that lives with them.  And if she
gets rid of the angry guy, she has to give up much of the rest of the
life as well.

Don't ask me what this has to do with what you said.  For some reason
that's what came into my mind.

Zorra
cailleach@hotmail.co.uk - 23 Jun 2006 13:42 GMT
>My friend is in the same situation I'm in.  She has a life she really
>likes, except for this angry guy that lives with them.

Well, I can see why you'd be thinking about this friend :-) Presumably
he's not just "this angry guy", he's also a guy she likes and values
when he *isn't* being angry.

Some rather lomg random thoughts on rage attacks....

Thought 1: You'll be delighted to know (not!) that two of my son's more
scary pre-diagnosis episodes involved scissors flying through the air.

Actually the first time, the scissors *didn't* fly. But he was holding
them while he was very, *very* enraged. The teacher decided the safest
thing to do was to clear all the other children from the classroom and
call for help. She told me afterwards that she didn't think he had any
intention of throwing the scissors or attacking with them, but he was
holding them and he would *not* put them down; he was not in full
control and it was a risk she could not take.

The second time was a slow burner from my point of view. My son was in
another room making angry noises and I heard a loud clonk. It was all
quiet aftwerwards so I didn't bother to investigate. Later on, by which
time my son had been calm for a while, I went in and noticed a pair of
heavy children's craft scissors on the floor near the door. I vaguely
wondered how they got there and picked them up. A couple of days later
I noticed a small deep dent in the wall. I vaguely wondered where
*that* had come from but I still didn't put two and two together. It
was maybe a week before I realised that those scissors had gone flying
through the air towards the door and taken that chunk out of the wall.
If I'd been coming through the door to see what he was upset about....
yikes. Well anyway, the craft scissors were put out of reach. As were
*all* the other scissors when I wasn't watching, for a very long time.

The funny (odd) thing with the second episode is that I wasn't scared
at the time. It was a long time before I added up the evidence and
longer still before the import - both the physical danger to me and the
implications about my son - really got through to me.

And yet, two years later, my son is still in a normal classroom, with
scissors, and he uses scissors same as the others. Ninety-nine per cent
of the time he is fine. And he is well supervised so for that other one
per cent, normal safety strategies apply.

Thought (2): Something else you might like to know about - the stages
of a rage attack, for children and adults.

Stage 1 - rumbling stage. The person is starting to get stressed, and
they may start to act stressed and angry (e.g. being rude, demanding,
impatient), or they may have some odd behaviours that don't seem to be
directly related to anger but that turn out to always happen before an
attack.  Sometimes it's possible to chill things down again at this
stage, by solving a problem for them, or leaving them alone, or
distracting them. But, sometimes it isn't possible! And challenging
someone directly during this stage can bring on the next stage.
Stage 2 - rage stage. Rationality is gone, and the person either
becomes violent, throws things, hits out, or may alternatively totally
shuts down and withdraws into themselves. At this stage, there is
little anyone can do except get out of the way.
Stage 3 - recovery stage. Some people are exhausted and fall asleep;
others are contrite; others may not remember what happened during the
rage. Even in recovery stage, trying to talk to them about what
happened may bring on another rage attack (depending). If the person is
not naturally contrite, then trying to get an apology from them at this
stage can be dangerous.
Stage 4 - back to kind-of-normal, maybe an hour or a day later. This is
usually the safest time to talk about it.

This is for an Aspie-type type rage attack, but it seems to follow a
similar-ish pattern to your husband's tempers(?), so this model might
give you a handle on his outbursts even if he isn't a proper Aspie!

And Thought (3) - a 24 hour plan? If he might be cracking up then it
would be useful to make a "24 hour plan" to get away in a crisis. You
might get a scenario where he has picked up the nearest object and
thrown it, and it's a dangerous object like a tool or a knife, and you
just want to get yourself and the children safely out of his way while
he calms down and you can think about what to do next. Something like:

Choose a place where you and the children could go. Maybe there's a
nice motel you know about, or family nearby, or ask a discreet
trustworthy friend if you and the children would be able to stay at her
place for 24 hours in case of emergency.

Make up a small case of stuff - fresh overnight things for you and the
children, a couple of new toys/amusements each. Keep it in your car.

Keep a clean credit card, some cash, car keys, mobile phone etc in a
purse/bag hanging near the door.

Think of short clear instructions ready to tell your children - perhaps
to go get a specific favourite/comforting toy and then go outside to
wait for you by the car.

You could probably leave the dog at home (but preferably not in the
same room as your husband!). I don't get the impression that your
husband is vengeful towards her. Nor that your husband would come after
you or try to stop you all leaving.

I think it's especially important to have a readymade plan because of
your daughter's potential ODD. If you appear confident and certain
because you have already decided what to do and where to go, she's a
lot more likely to do as you tell her in an emergency. It may not be
possible to work out in advance what you'll do after that, because the
circumstances are not predictable, but once you get to your temporary
place you'll be able to decide what to do next, whether that is simply
to go back, or to stay away, call mental health, return the children,
send them to family, etc etc.

You may never need to *use* the 24-hour plan, but IMO it's a good idea
to have it for "just in case".

All the best,

Cailleach

> >> Well, no, I don't really.  Or at least I don't think there is
> >> anything different that I could have done to make a different
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Zorra
Tai - 23 Jun 2006 13:58 GMT
>> My friend is in the same situation I'm in.  She has a life she really
>> likes, except for this angry guy that lives with them.
[quoted text clipped - 109 lines]
> You may never need to *use* the 24-hour plan, but IMO it's a good idea
> to have it for "just in case".

If Zorra truly needs to have such a plan in place she shouldn't be living
with her husband at all. What kind of a life is that, to live in fear!

It worries me how easily you diagnose mental defect or illness in a third
party through a poster's anecdotes, Cailleach. I know you're trying to help
Zorra but I think it's irresponsible and wrong of you.

Tai
Robert Grumbine - 23 Jun 2006 14:36 GMT
[large snip of almost everything to get to an aspect that I've been
meaning to mention and never found a good place for it in the thread]

>> You may never need to *use* the 24-hour plan, but IMO it's a good idea
>> to have it for "just in case".
>
>If Zorra truly needs to have such a plan in place she shouldn't be living
>with her husband at all. What kind of a life is that, to live in fear!

 Emergency preparedness is not the same thing as living in fear.  
At least I hope not, as I prepare for hurricanes, tornadoes, extended
power failures, water system failures, ...  (not all that well, but
better than nothing).  

 There is a fair degree to which those more general emergency preparations
are also suitable for response to 'my spouse has become a threat to
my well being'.  Irrespective of spouse, it's a good idea to have some
cash and credit other than in your house.  House could be flattened by
a tree/tornado/fire.  Figuring out which friends you could drop in on
(solo, with kids, drop kids only, ...) is again good regardless of why.

 The worst time to figure out what you would do in an emergency is
after it happens.  Hurricanes in my area are something like a once
in 10-20 years sort of event.  Still, the remains of one did come
through a few years ago and wreck some havoc.  

Signature

Robert Grumbine http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links.
Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much
evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they
would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences

Tai - 23 Jun 2006 15:20 GMT
> [large snip of almost everything to get to an aspect that I've been
> meaning to mention and never found a good place for it in the thread]
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> in 10-20 years sort of event.  Still, the remains of one did come
> through a few years ago and wreck some havoc.

I don't know how preparing for a possible natural disaster can properly be
compared to living in a situation where you think it's possible your spouse
could actually be a danger to you or your children when upset or angry.
Sure, some of the physical preparations may overlap but one is a set of
various risks that we all have to accept may happen - and be more or less
likely depending on where we live - the other is simply an intolerable and
unnatural state to exist in for any length of time. Of course it would be
living in fear! And what of worth can be left of the relationship at that
point, anyway?

Tai
cailleach@hotmail.co.uk - 23 Jun 2006 20:52 GMT
>What kind of a life is that, to live in fear!

Not a nice life, Tai :-(. But this is for the short term, not forever.
I was thinking until they've had a session or two with Zorra's
daughter's therapist, until Zorra knew whether anything helpful for her
husband would come from that direction.

Zorra seems to be living in hurricane season right now. It wont always
be like that - or if it is, I'm sure Zorra will move on to something
else.

If Zorra decided to leave right this minute, I'd be fine with that. I
hope I'd already made that clear! But so long as she stays and the
crisis goes on, surely there's nothing so very wrong in having an
escape plan at the ready. That would apply as much to potentially
worsening domestic abuse as to a potential mental breakdown.

>It worries me how easily you diagnose mental defect or illness in a third
>party through a poster's anecdotes, Cailleach. I know you're trying to help
>Zorra but I think it's irresponsible and wrong of you.

I don't think I can do much about that. Sorry. I honestly don't make a
habit of Aspie-spotting and before ever I posted here I did think very
carefully about whether I might be doing Zorra more harm than good. I
still worry about that, I do always think carefully about what I say to
her and whether to say anything at all before I post, because there are
at least three vulnerable people involved. So yes, my advice could
still be wrong, but no, I don't think that's being irresponsible.

And it's not about amateur diagnosis either - Zorra needs to *know*
when my advice is from Aspie-context and when it is not. It would be
wrong and irresponsible for me to appear to produce suggestions out of
nowhere.

And if Zorra wants me to back off then I will, and I wont take offense!

All the best,

Cailleach

(Sorry if this is a multiple post - my newsfeed is playing up...)

> > [large snip of almost everything to get to an aspect that I've been
> > meaning to mention and never found a good place for it in the thread]
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> Tai
Stephanie Stowe - 23 Jun 2006 21:02 GMT
> >What kind of a life is that, to live in fear!
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> If Zorra decided to leave right this minute,

Wow, that seems to me to be a not good idea without some kind of plan for
all the details that will change, like finances, living arrangements,
emotional support.

> I'd be fine with that. I
> hope I'd already made that clear! But so long as she stays and the
[quoted text clipped - 67 lines]
> >
> > Tai
cailleach@hotmail.co.uk - 23 Jun 2006 21:18 GMT
>> If Zorra decided to leave right this minute,

>Wow, that seems to me to be a not good idea without some kind of plan for
>all the details that will change, like finances, living arrangements,
>emotional support.

I meant, if she made the *decision* right this minute! And then
(hopefully) planned for it, and went :-)

The 24-hour plan is for emergencies. Zorra could also make a
non-emergency, long-term kind of plan for leaving. But IMO the
emergency one is both easier and more urgent to have in place.

Cailleach

> > >What kind of a life is that, to live in fear!
> >
[quoted text clipped - 91 lines]
> > >
> > > Tai
Bill in Co. - 23 Jun 2006 21:56 GMT
>>> What kind of a life is that, to live in fear!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> Zorra seems to be living in hurricane season right now. It wont always
>> be like that - or if it is, I'm sure Zorra will move on to something
else.

>> If Zorra decided to leave right this minute,
>
> Wow, that seems to me to be a not good idea without some kind of plan for
> all the details that will change, like finances, living arrangements,
> emotional support.

But I don't think she's at this stage that she's working on this.  I'm
assuming she thinks it's too far out of practibility.     Am I right, Zorra?

>> I'd be fine with that. I
>> hope I'd already made that clear! But so long as she stays and the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>>> It worries me how easily you diagnose mental defect or illness in a
third
>>> party through a poster's anecdotes, Cailleach. I know you're trying to
help
>>> Zorra but I think it's irresponsible and wrong of you.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>
>> Cailleach
Zorra - 24 Jun 2006 00:27 GMT
> But I don't think she's at this stage that she's working on this.
> I'm
> assuming she thinks it's too far out of practibility.     Am I
> right, Zorra?

I think I'm working on working on this.  I don't know really.  I think
I still want things to get better.  But when people started talking
about witnesses-- how did they put it?  That when you talk down your
spouse to other people, you are trying to get support for leaving.
Maybe that's what I'm doing here.  Maybe I'm trying to build a
rock-solid case so that when I leave no one can question that it was
the right thing to do.  It's not conscious if that is what I'm doing,
but it did make sense to me.

Zorra
Joy - 24 Jun 2006 01:27 GMT
>> But I don't think she's at this stage that she's working on this. I'm
>> assuming she thinks it's too far out of practibility.     Am I right,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I'm doing here.  Maybe I'm trying to build a rock-solid case so that when
> I leave no one can question that it was the right thing to do.

It seems to me that if it were that you were trying to build this case,
you'd be talking to your family, not to strangers on usenet.  Maybe what you
are doing here is trying to get a calibration point - to regain a sense of
what is normal/abnormal?
Robert Grumbine - 24 Jun 2006 02:26 GMT
>>> But I don't think she's at this stage that she's working on this. I'm
>>> assuming she thinks it's too far out of practibility.     Am I right,
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>are doing here is trying to get a calibration point - to regain a sense of
>what is normal/abnormal?

 This is my vote.

 If the other people conceivably interact with your spouse, that's one
thing.  A group of people who only know what you write, and don't know
either you or your spouse in 3d ... that's a very different thing.  

 As to calibration points, a couple of my own: One is, throwing something
in frustration, in no particular direction, is one thing.  Whether to
worry about it or not is far from obvious from outside.  A different
matter is the person disclaiming responsibility for his own actions.
This is always troubling and deserves some thought on your part (even
more so if you're the one who's not responsible for your own actions).

 As to the latter, two things.  One is, what Zorra writes here is
almost certainly not what any of us would write if we were the proverbial
flies on the wall.  No knock on Zorra -- nobody is a remote witness to
her own life.  Second is, those proverbial flies might write
something that made Mr. Zorra seem more responsible and reasonable,
not just (as some seem to be assuming) less responsible or reasonable.  
We just don't know from here, and can never know.

 This doesn't actually matter to Zorra getting some calibration points.  
If what was actually happening were less drastic than some people see
it -- as filtered both through the writing process and again through the
reading process -- the comments we'd make still have value as references.  
If what is actually happening is more drastic than some see it, through
equal filters, this still permits some constructive comments to be made.  
Either way, more useful (imho, of course) if the responses elaborate as
to exactly why we're making those suggestions that we're doing.  The
elaborations provide the calibration and are probably more valuable
than the actions.  The latter make most sense if our readings of both
Zorra and Mr. Zorra (and their kids) through the writings here are nigh
on infallible.  They're not.  But the scenarios we write up ourselves,
including responses, for Zorra to consider have some value as calibration
points and 'what if' ideas (if those points have some merit in her eyes
for reasons she hasn't written here).

 Plus, of course, even if the scenarios and responses don't have
merit in Zorra's eyes for her situation, other people read here and
may recognize important considerations for their situation.

Signature

Robert Grumbine http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links.
Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much
evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they
would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences

Zorra - 24 Jun 2006 04:35 GMT
>  If the other people conceivably interact with your spouse, that's
> one
> thing.  A group of people who only know what you write, and don't
> know
> either you or your spouse in 3d ... that's a very different thing.

It's not like people in real life know much more or can judge much
better than you guys anyway.  You never can tell what is going on
behind your neighbor's closed doors.

Zorra
Robert Grumbine - 24 Jun 2006 12:01 GMT
>>  If the other people conceivably interact with your spouse, that's
>> one
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>better than you guys anyway.  You never can tell what is going on
>behind your neighbor's closed doors.

 Of course.  But the people in 3d can start acting differently
towards your spouse, could start saying things to him, etc.
Folks here can supply perspective without chance of it leaving
its safely distant niche.

Signature

Robert Grumbine http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links.
Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much
evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they
would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences

Zorra - 24 Jun 2006 14:49 GMT
>  Of course.  But the people in 3d can start acting differently
> towards your spouse, could start saying things to him, etc.

I suppose they *could* but they don't.

Zorra
Zorra - 24 Jun 2006 04:33 GMT
>> I think I'm working on working on this.  I don't know really.  I
>> think I still want things to get better.  But when people started
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Maybe what you are doing here is trying to get a calibration point -
> to regain a sense of what is normal/abnormal?

But see, I *have* started talking more to my family.  I stayed
overnight with my mom a few weeks ago, and really told her almost
everything.  I'm not sure why, but I think it was because I couldn't
stand anymore to have her just love DH so much, and always put down my
BIL.  See, DH makes more money, comes from a higher class family, can
be charming when he wants to, and is good at "helping out".  Every
time we visit, he says, "What can I fix?  What needs doing?"  My poor
BIL has a blue collar job, comes from a lower class family (not only
money-wise, but out-of-wedlock kids, drug problems, welfare fraud,
CPS, etc.), generally has a more unkempt appearance, and has a
tendency to make himself scarce when we come around.  So of course my
mom just loves DH.  But BIL is not only an honest, hard-working man,
he actually makes my sister happy.  When I told mom she should lighten
up on him and asked, "Which is more important in a son-in-law -- that
he makes you happy?  Or that he makes your daughter happy?"  She
replied, "Well, your sister is easy to please."

I regretted opening up to her because it only upset her.  It's not
like she can do anything.  And I'm still not sure if she accepts what
I tell her, or if she just thinks I'm hard to please.  :-(

Zorra
cailleach@hotmail.co.uk - 26 Jun 2006 11:43 GMT
> But see, I *have* started talking more to my family.  I stayed
> overnight with my mom a few weeks ago, and really told her almost
> everything.

Can you talk to your sister at all?

You may have married two very different men, but you both seem to value
some of the same things in a marriage. You understand what she values
in her man, and you can see the lack of them in your own husband. Your
sister's values are different from your mother's. Could your sister
understand?

All the best,

Cailleach

> >> I think I'm working on working on this.  I don't know really.  I
> >> think I still want things to get better.  But when people started
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Zorra
WhansaMi - 23 Jun 2006 22:45 GMT
> > >What kind of a life is that, to live in fear!
> >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> all the details that will change, like finances, living arrangements,
> emotional support.

Steph, you know I love you, right?  <g>

I'm going to ask you for a favor.  Like me, you usually reply immediately
after the segment you are responding to.  But, sometimes you insert things
at three or four spots, whereas other times, only in one place.  My problem
is, after I've read the first response, I often look for other insertions...
and find myself scrolling up and down the full length of the whole post in
search of things.

You may be like me in another way and find it is hard to break old habits,
but if you could maybe snip the remainder of the post after you've replied
to the last bit you intend to reply to, it would be a big help for me -- I
won't be looking for things that aren't there.

If you can't/won't/aren't inclined to... well, I'll live.  :-)

Sheila
Zorra - 24 Jun 2006 00:24 GMT
> Steph, you know I love you, right?  <g>
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> If you can't/won't/aren't inclined to... well, I'll live.  :-)

Now that's odd.  I've gotten so used to the one line zinger from
Steph, that usually after I've found the first one, I assume there's
nothing left.  I've missed some that way.

Zorra
Stephanie Stowe - 24 Jun 2006 01:07 GMT
> > Steph, you know I love you, right?  <g>
> >
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Zorra

The old grey mare (my brain) aint what she used to be. Someday I'll get
around to posting how completely different my life is and how lovely the
changes are to my attention span. (Not!) Sorry.
Stephanie Stowe - 24 Jun 2006 00:36 GMT
> You may be like me in another way and find it is hard to break old habits,
> but if you could maybe snip the remainder of the post after you've replied
> to the last bit you intend to reply to, it would be a big help for me -- I
> won't be looking for things that aren't there.

Geez. Trust me that you are not the first to tell me this. I Will Try! I
Will Forget! Feel free to remind me in a year or tow. :)

<SNIP>
Bill in Co. - 24 Jun 2006 01:19 GMT
>> You may be like me in another way and find it is hard to break old habits,
>> but if you could maybe snip the remainder of the post after you've replied
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> <SNIP>

Anyway you post is fine with me.
Kitty - 24 Jun 2006 06:49 GMT
>> You may be like me in another way and find it is hard to break old habits,
>> but if you could maybe snip the remainder of the post after you've replied
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Geez. Trust me that you are not the first to tell me this. I Will Try! I
>Will Forget! Feel free to remind me in a year or tow. :)

My mouse scroll wheel and my arthritic fingers thank you kindly :D
Tai - 25 Jun 2006 07:44 GMT
>> What kind of a life is that, to live in fear!
>
> Not a nice life, Tai :-(. But this is for the short term, not forever.

Why do you think it's for the short term? Everything points to her husband
being resolute about being unpleasant to Zorra as a permanent condition
whether he flies off the handle more often  in the future or not. It's the
basic level of emotional pain that is caused by his nastiness which is the
most damaging aspect to Zorra.

> I was thinking until they've had a session or two with Zorra's
> daughter's therapist, until Zorra knew whether anything helpful for
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> escape plan at the ready. That would apply as much to potentially
> worsening domestic abuse as to a potential mental breakdown.

I don't have a problem with Zorra being advised to make preparations that
will ease her life it's that I think that advocating for emergency ones is
missing the point.

The main problem she has is in that sense is that Zorra doesn't feel as if
she's on a strong enough footing with respect to her husband. I don't think
she'd need to feel in an equal position but if she knew she could support
herself I believe a lot of the reasons for her putting up with vile
behaviour from her husband would disappear.

However, I am also very aware that the situation with her daughter actually
makes it more difficult for Zorra to find employment that would be better
compensated but which would probably also require closer to full-time hours.
Nothing is easy for her about the choices she has available right now and
they all have negative side effects for her.

>> It worries me how easily you diagnose mental defect or illness in a
>> third party through a poster's anecdotes, Cailleach. I know you're
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> advice could still be wrong, but no, I don't think that's being
> irresponsible.

I disagree - it's wrong to say her husband is having a nervous breakdown
when you don't know that just as it was wrong of you diagnose Asperger's,
especially when it's quite clear her husband behaves quite differently
outside his family life. He has control over the way he presents himself to
others.

> And it's not about amateur diagnosis either - Zorra needs to *know*
> when my advice is from Aspie-context and when it is not. It would be
> wrong and irresponsible for me to appear to produce suggestions out of
> nowhere.

Make suggestions but stop making diagnoses by trying to squeeze Zorra's
anecdotes into sets of symptoms - that's what's irresponsible of you.

Tai
Bill in Co. - 25 Jun 2006 08:57 GMT
>>> What kind of a life is that, to live in fear!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> especially when it's quite clear her husband behaves quite differently
> outside his family life.  He has control over the way he presents himself
to
> others.

He does?     Not unless someone somehow makes him see the light.   And I'm
sure as far as he's concerned, it's not on him.    (yes, in theory he does
have the control, but without the motivation to do so, it's kinda moot,
isn't it?)

>> And it's not about amateur diagnosis either - Zorra needs to *know*
>> when my advice is from Aspie-context and when it is not. It would be
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Make suggestions but stop making diagnoses by trying to squeeze Zorra's
> anecdotes into sets of symptoms - that's what's irresponsible of you.

Yeah, we could well do without the "excuse labels".    There's waaaay too
much of that today.
Zorra - 25 Jun 2006 15:57 GMT
>>> What kind of a life is that, to live in fear!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> the future or not. It's the basic level of emotional pain that is
> caused by his nastiness which is the most damaging aspect to Zorra.

I agree with this for the most part.  I do think there might be a way
to lower his stress level to the point where he isn't losing control,
but I'm not sure how, or if it's possible for me to do it for him.

As for living with disdain, well, that's starting to get old.

Zorra
Zorra - 24 Jun 2006 00:53 GMT
> And yet, two years later, my son is still in a normal classroom,
> with
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> one
> per cent, normal safety strategies apply.

Well, that's good at least.  Maybe he really has reached the peak of
his loss of control.  "He" here could apply to either my DH or your
DS.

> Thought (2): Something else you might like to know about - the
> stages
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> might
> give you a handle on his outbursts even if he isn't a proper Aspie!

Yes, this all sounds very familiar, but I have to say that I would
think any rage attack would be similar.  The worst part of it for me
is that in Stage 4, he still will not talk about it, accept
responsibility, or apologize.

> And Thought (3) - a 24 hour plan? If he might be cracking up then it
> would be useful to make a "24 hour plan" to get away in a crisis.

Perhaps.  I don't feel that sense of danger yet.

Zorra
cailleach@hotmail.co.uk - 24 Jun 2006 15:04 GMT
> I have to say that I would think any rage attack would be similar.

Fair enough - I just didn't know how general this rage-attack model is
because I only know about it an Aspie context.  If it *does* apply to
most rage attacks then it's more likely to be useful to you too.

I suppose the Aspie-specific stuff would be more to do with details
like the kinds of things that are likely triggers. But even with that,
I think the most important thing is to accept that if something *looks*
like a general stressor or a trigger for his temper then it probably
*is* a stressor/trigger for him, however bizarre or trivial or unlikely
it may be. Much more important than trying to figure out whether it's
an Aspie trigger or not :-)

>The worst part of it for me is that in Stage 4, he still will not talk about it, accept
>responsibility, or apologize.

Just because he wont accept he has a problem, that doesn't mean he
doesn't *have* a problem! It's not as if you've done anything to him
that's so obvious that you should be able to *know* without being told,
nor that you've done anything so terrible that you don't deserve an
apology. We *do* know that pretty surely, because you've told us what
led up to it.

IMO, if a person has such an outburst and can't/wont talk about it, or
accept responsibility, or apologise, then that is a sign that there is
*some* kind of problem in and of itself.  I could speculate for hours
about what that problem could be, but that might not be productive!
Yes, life would probably make a lot more sense if only you knew what
the problem was, but we don't. All I could really say is, surely there
*is* a problem.

>Well, that's good at least.  Maybe he really has reached the peak of
>his loss of control.  "He" here could apply to either my DH or your
>DS.

For my son, yes, we're well past peak, at least until he reaches
adolescence when apparently there's another likely bad patch (and I
can't tell you how much I'm *not* looking forward to that! :-( ) For
your husband I'm not so sure, because a lot has improved for my son
between then and now. We know (mostly! :-)) which situations stress him
out, we know why, we know how to avoid them and how to ameliorate them.
Like your friend with the super-anxious husband, we still make vast
numbers of little adaptations just to avoid big trouble. So he has
fewer rage attacks and they are usually less severe, and he is starting
to do a little self calming too.

But for your husband, I don't at all know where he's at. You've
described a bunch of things in his life that have got *worse* for him
recently. We don't know what's stressing him out most because he
can't/wont tell you, and he can't/wont seek help from the professionals
who could work it out for him. So I don't know if he's near peak, or
past peak, or just grumbling along and there wont be any more serious
chucking stuff.

I can only guess, and as Robert says, there's every chance that my
guesses will be wrong. I'm just laying out one possible viewpoint for
you while other people, like Tai, are laying out different ones. And
even if it's not possible to choose between them, there may be some
things that work OK *whichever* is right.

>> And Thought (3) - a 24 hour plan?

>Perhaps.  I don't feel that sense of danger yet.

Given how long it took me for the scissor-chucking to sink in (bad
choice of words but you know what I mean! :-)) you might want to set it
up before you feel a real sense of danger. Even following the plan
doesn't commit you to anything - you might land in the motel and then
decide to call your husband and all go home again after an hour.

All the best,

Cailleach

> > And yet, two years later, my son is still in a normal classroom,
> > with
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> Zorra
Amy Lou - 23 Jun 2006 13:43 GMT
"Zorra" <zorra@adelphia.net> wrote in message

> My friend is in the same situation I'm in.  She has a life she really
> likes, except for this angry guy that lives with them.  And if she gets
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Don't ask me what this has to do with what you said.  For some reason
> that's what came into my mind.

LOL! Maybe that came to mind because my suggestion was about dealing with
the inconvenience of living with that angry guy....you need strategies to
cope. It comes down to this: you manage the situation in order to maintain
your otherwise great life, and you keep on managing the situation until the
time comes when you decide it is no longer worth it.

Amy
Bill in Co. - 23 Jun 2006 21:53 GMT
> "Zorra" <zorra@adelphia.net> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Amy

IF that time ever comes.    I don't know, it doesn't sound too good.
Zorra - 24 Jun 2006 00:30 GMT
> "Zorra" <zorra@adelphia.net> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> managing the situation until the time comes when you decide it is no
> longer worth it.

Yeah.  I thought I should suggest to her that she and her kids move in
with me (a la Kate & Allie) and our two guys could move in together.
It's actually an attractive idea if only it weren't so impractical.

Zorra
Amy Lou - 25 Jun 2006 06:11 GMT
> Yeah.  I thought I should suggest to her that she and her kids move in
> with me (a la Kate & Allie) and our two guys could move in together. It's
> actually an attractive idea if only it weren't so impractical.

Or you could try doing a few days of 'wife swap'. :)

Amy
La Mer - 25 Jun 2006 06:14 GMT
> > Yeah.  I thought I should suggest to her that she and her kids move in
> > with me (a la Kate & Allie) and our two guys could move in together. It's
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Amy

I'm embarrassed to admit that I've even watched that show a few
times...but I have to say; I do appreciate what I have when I see some
of those husbands!!!!
Bill in Co. - 25 Jun 2006 07:07 GMT
>>> Yeah.  I thought I should suggest to her that she and her kids move in
>>> with me (a la Kate & Allie) and our two guys could move in together. It's
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I'm embarrassed to admit that I've even watched that show a few
> times...

And well you should be.    But that's better than watching Springer, so
there may still be hope for ya.
Zorra - 25 Jun 2006 06:16 GMT
>> Yeah.  I thought I should suggest to her that she and her kids move
>> in with me (a la Kate & Allie) and our two guys could move in
>> together. It's actually an attractive idea if only it weren't so
>> impractical.
>
> Or you could try doing a few days of 'wife swap'. :)

:-)  After a few months with her, I can guarantee you he'd be begging
for me to come back!  Not that she's so bad -- she's a great woman and
my best friend.  It's just that the two of them would butt heads like
you wouldn't believe.  Of course, after a few months with a man so
angry he can make the neighbors scared, I'd probably be running back
here anyway.

Zorra
Bill in Co. - 25 Jun 2006 07:06 GMT
>> Yeah.  I thought I should suggest to her that she and her kids move in
>> with me (a la Kate & Allie) and our two guys could move in together. It's
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Amy

That's immoral.    Well, ok, it used to be.    Today?     Who knows....
Zorra - 25 Jun 2006 07:14 GMT
>>> Yeah.  I thought I should suggest to her that she and her kids
>>> move in
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> That's immoral.    Well, ok, it used to be.    Today?     Who
> knows....

lol -- Have you ever watched the show?  Cheesy, yes, but immoral?
Well, they have rules about how the husband and wife aren't allowed to
touch each other, and there are production and camera crews
chaperoning at all times (maybe security as well, who knows?)

Zorra
Bill in Co. - 25 Jun 2006 07:27 GMT
>>>> Yeah.  I thought I should suggest to her that she and her kids move in
>>>> with me (a la Kate & Allie) and our two guys could move in together.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Zorra

No, I haven't watched it.    I can't stand most of that fluffy or immoral
junk on TV today.    So instead I watch Cold Case Files, American Justice,
Forensic Files, and many of the A&E documentaries, to try to keep things
more in perspective.   (Need that dose of reality check).
Bill in Co. - 25 Jun 2006 09:21 GMT
>>>>> Yeah.  I thought I should suggest to her that she and her kids move in
>>>>> with me (a la Kate & Allie) and our two guys could move in together.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Forensic Files, and many of the A&E documentaries, to try to keep things
> "more in perspective".   (I need that dose of  "reality check").

Ooops.    There seems to be a touch of sarcasm in there.    (Damn, it must
be leakin out now...)
Joy - 25 Jun 2006 14:18 GMT
>>>>> Yeah.  I thought I should suggest to her that she and her kids move in
>>>>> with me (a la Kate & Allie) and our two guys could move in together.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Forensic Files, and many of the A&E documentaries, to try to keep things
> more in perspective.   (Need that dose of reality check).

Ewww.  I can't stand shows like those - it feels too much like wallowing in
the dark side of life to me.  That can't be healthy for you.

OTOH, while I'm not a regular viewer, I have watched Wife Swap a couple of
times, and while I agree that it is cheesy and they've deliberately selected
incompatible families to get things riled up, there is also something
interesting about seeing how other people live.  There's a lot of variety
out there in how families divide up the workload, spend their recreational
time, educate their children, etc, and there is some value to recognizing
that your way isn't the only way, and that there are things you can learn
from others...
Zorra - 25 Jun 2006 16:00 GMT
> OTOH, while I'm not a regular viewer, I have watched Wife Swap a
> couple of times, and while I agree that it is cheesy and they've
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> etc, and there is some value to recognizing that your way isn't the
> only way, and that there are things you can learn from others...

Yeah, I think the show is at it's best when they show two perfectly
reasonable families, and then show the disconnect when they try to
swap.  When they choose people who are just over the top nuts, it
leaves a sour feeling in my stomach.

Zorra
Bill in Co. - 25 Jun 2006 20:01 GMT
>>>>>> Yeah.  I thought I should suggest to her that she and her kids move in
>>>>>> with me (a la Kate & Allie) and our two guys could move in together.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Ewww.  I can't stand shows like those - it feels too much like wallowing in
> the dark side of life to me.  That can't be healthy for you.

Well, see, it gives me some more insight into the true potential of mankind
at his core level.   And especially, the interviews with the serial killers.
I just sit there listening to them, over and over and over again, completely
stunned, even now, almost beyond belief and comprehension.    But I still
can't get really into their minds - not really.

You know, it truly is an eye-opener on the aberrant nature, potential, and
capabilities of mankind.    So it just seems to reinforce (and perhaps
justify, in some weird sense, I dunno) my current feelings of despair.    So
in a sense, I guess, at least I was right about something there.   (If this
doesn't make a lot of sense to you, I wouldn't be surprised - logic
evidently isn't involved here).
Emma Anne - 25 Jun 2006 23:22 GMT
> Well, see, it gives me some more insight into the true potential of mankind
> at his core level.   And especially, the interviews with the serial killers.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> doesn't make a lot of sense to you, I wouldn't be surprised - logic
> evidently isn't involved here).

Bill, please stop watching thes shows.  You are reinforcing your own
depression.  Not wise.  Not good.
Kitty - 25 Jun 2006 23:54 GMT
>> Well, see, it gives me some more insight into the true potential of mankind
>> at his core level.   And especially, the interviews with the serial killers.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Bill, please stop watching thes shows.  You are reinforcing your own
>depression.  Not wise.  Not good.

Yeah, extreme deviations (in good or bad don't do much to speak for
the core of an average human.)
Zorra - 26 Jun 2006 00:42 GMT
> Yeah, extreme deviations (in good or bad don't do much to speak for
> the core of an average human.)

And one thing that has definitely changed since the 50's is that the
bad news, the news that appeals to our morbid curiosity, can be
transmitted around the world in full color in seconds.

Zorra
Kitty - 26 Jun 2006 04:09 GMT
>> Yeah, extreme deviations (in good or bad don't do much to speak for
>> the core of an average human.)
>
>And one thing that has definitely changed since the 50's is that the
>bad news, the news that appeals to our morbid curiosity, can be
>transmitted around the world in full color in seconds.

You know what though, I was thinking, there's always been morbid
things around us.
I keep thinking how things wee back home, when I was growing up, which
was more like 1940's or 50 in this country.
Morbid things that you see today on the news, you wee able to see more
first hand. You didn't have to watch cops to see wife beaters, you had
a few just down the street, you could hear them. When it came to
illnesses and other deviations, they weren't as segregated away from
he society as they are from our typical suburban life, that you only
got to see them on TV.

I think what is different is that since the exposure is in the hand of
the media which depends on ratings and viewership, they found a way to
exploit some of that curiosity, an add a dose of glamour and sensation
to it.

Serial killers etc.. There would be people whom disappeared or turned
up dead, and majority of the cases would never get solved. For
example, since the government would on occasion 'make people
disappear, if someone was missing, most people wouldn't dare to
question it.  Also, the forensics, the technology or the man power
weren't available to investigate.

There were brutal killings of civilians done in the name of government
back there, people of violent character often found themselves in
positions of some sort of an executioner.

Having grown up in and seen things like that, and now living in an
ultra safe suburbia where half the time I forget to lock my front
door, I think many of us with your typical American middle and higher
class style life are lulled in a bit of a false sense of what life is
like for an average person across the world.

Anyway, that's how things look from my perspective. That in last few
generations standard of living has risen so much in this county that
lot of the inhabitants take it for granted and lose perspective.
Bill in Co. - 26 Jun 2006 05:31 GMT
>>> Yeah, extreme deviations (in good or bad don't do much to speak for
>>> the core of an average human.)
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> generations standard of living has risen so much in this county that
> lot of the inhabitants take it for granted and lose perspective.

Yes, it is true, we have flush toilets these days.
Zorra - 26 Jun 2006 19:50 GMT
> You know what though, I was thinking, there's always been morbid
> things around us.
> I keep thinking how things wee back home, when I was growing up,
> which
> was more like 1940's or 50 in this country.

I don't know, but people just "disappearing" and people assuming that
the government was responsible doesn't sound like 40's or 50's
America.

I think that how much violence you see around you is very much a
function of where you live.  I have been lucky never to have had
anyone that I know well be a victim of violence.

Now, I have *heard* about violence in my area, but hearing about it is
not the same as seeing it in full color.

Zorra
Bill in Co. - 26 Jun 2006 00:19 GMT
>> Well, see, it gives me some more insight into the true potential of mankind
>> at his core level.   And especially, the interviews with the serial killers.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Bill, please stop watching thes shows.  You are reinforcing your own
> depression.  Not wise.  Not good.

But I can at least really FEEL something when I watch these shows.    I can
feel the loss for all the victims - it's so horrific.   And I can empathize
with the victims, and their families, and their losses.     Which means I
can feel again.
Zorra - 26 Jun 2006 04:08 GMT
> But I can at least really FEEL something when I watch these shows.
> I can
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> means I
> can feel again.

You should try reading stories of triumph and perseverance.  I was at
my in-laws reading a Reader's Digest, of all things, when I read a
story of a man rescuing 5 children from a small island in the middle
of a raging river.  The tears just ran down my face as I read the
story, and I was laughing and crying at the same time because it was
the first time in *years* I'd really felt anything at all.  (As a
comparison, I only felt quiet shock on 9/11/01 -- I felt bad then that
nothing I read or saw made me cry).  If stories of horror can make you
feel something, I'm sure stories of triumph can too.  And you'll see
that there are still heroes "these days" who will risk everything,
including their very lives, to help others.

Zorra
Emma Anne - 26 Jun 2006 21:01 GMT
> > Bill, please stop watching thes shows.  You are reinforcing your own
> > depression.  Not wise.  Not good.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> with the victims, and their families, and their losses.     Which means I
> can feel again.

I bet if you laid off of the scary and depressing stuff, you'd find
yourself feeling other things.
La Mer - 26 Jun 2006 04:41 GMT
> > Well, see, it gives me some more insight into the true potential of mankind
> > at his core level.   And especially, the interviews with the serial killers.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Bill, please stop watching thes shows.  You are reinforcing your own
> depression.  Not wise.  Not good.

Oh my gosh, I could not agree more!  My husband enjoys that stuff from
time to time but he is capable of not getting crazed over it or it
making him crazed (as I would become!)  I suspect Bill, that although
you've justified why you like watching it;  it does not serve any
positive purpose in your life.  Au contraire, n'est pas?
Bill in Co. - 26 Jun 2006 05:30 GMT
>>> Well, see, it gives me some more insight into the true potential of mankind
>>> at his core level.   And especially, the interviews with the serial killers.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> you've justified why you like watching it;  it does not serve any
> positive purpose in your life.  Au contraire, n'est pas?

"Purpose" ?????????????????????????????????

I'll have to go look that term up somewhere, and get back to you on that.
Don't wait up.
La Mer - 26 Jun 2006 05:39 GMT
> >>> Well, see, it gives me some more insight into the true potential of
> mankind
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> I'll have to go look that term up somewhere, and get back to you on that.
> Don't wait up.

Excellent diversion!  And thanks for the heads up on not waiting up for
you.  I guess you'll be spending your time disagreeing with all of us
who think that you're contributing to your despair and bleak outlook on
humankind by watching the history of psychopaths :-)  Nighty night
though!
Bill in Co. - 26 Jun 2006 05:45 GMT
>>>>> Well, see, it gives me some more insight into the true potential of
>>>>> mankind at his core level.   And especially, the interviews with the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>>>>
>>>>> You know, it truly is an eye-opener on the aberrant nature, potential,
and
>>>>> capabilities of mankind.    So it just seems to reinforce (and perhaps
>>>>> justify, in some weird sense, I dunno) my current feelings of despair.
So
>>>>> in a sense, I guess, at least I was right about something there.   (If
>>>>> this doesn't make a lot of sense to you, I wouldn't be surprised -
logic
>>>>> evidently isn't involved here).
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> humankind by watching the history of psychopaths :-)  Nighty night
> though!

I'm not denying there's some truth there.
As for the "diversion" part, I'm not sure what you mean.    I stated what I
felt, so there was no "diversion" (as far as I can see).    Diversion woulda
been if I had talked about something else, like the price of tea in China,
or whatever.
Joy - 26 Jun 2006 02:31 GMT
>>> No, I haven't watched it.    I can't stand most of that fluffy or
>>> immoral
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> mankind
> at his core level.

That's nonsense.  It may give you some insight into the thought process of
the sick and twisted, perhaps.  This is a far, far cry from "the true
potential of mankind at his core level".  Since when do serial killers get
to represent mankind in the first place?  And why on earth would you think
they were any more representative of the true potential of mankind than
people who are doing *good* things?  Why would you think a serial killer was
more representative of the true potential of mankind than, say, a musician
or an athlete or a teacher or an explorer or an astronaut or an engineer, or
anybody who aspires to something good?

And especially, the interviews with the serial killers.
> I just sit there listening to them, over and over and over again,
> completely
> stunned, even now, almost beyond belief and comprehension.    But I still
> can't get really into their minds - not really.

Good.

> You know, it truly is an eye-opener on the aberrant nature, potential, and
> capabilities of mankind.    So it just seems to reinforce (and perhaps
> justify, in some weird sense, I dunno) my current feelings of despair.

No kidding.  Of *course* wallowing in the thoughts of the sick and twisted
would reinforce your feelings of despair.  That would be the expected end
result.  I'd disagree with the word justify, however.

You're lacking balance here.  Wallowing in bad stuff and ignoring the good
*will* lead to despair - but it is a *choice*.  You, Bill, are *choosing* to
live in despair, because you are *choosing* to wallow in the ugly, sick, and
twisted.  You could, however, make a different choice.  For example, you
could choose to watch inspiring real-life stories instead of listening to
interviews with serial killers over and over.


Bill in Co. - 26 Jun 2006 05:41 GMT
>>>> No, I haven't watched it.    I can't stand most of that fluffy or
immoral
>>>> junk on TV today.    So instead I watch Cold Case Files, American
Justice,
>>>> Forensic Files, and many of the A&E documentaries, to try to keep things
>>>> more in perspective.   (Need that dose of reality check).
>>>
>>> Ewww.  I can't stand shows like those - it feels too much like wallowing
in
>>> the dark side of life to me.  That can't be healthy for you.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>> I just sit there listening to them, over and over and over again,
completely
>> stunned, even now, almost beyond belief and comprehension.    But I still
>> can't get really into their minds - not really.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> *will* lead to despair - but it is a *choice*.  You, Bill, are *choosing* to
> live in despair,

Because that's how I feel.    Misery loves company, I guess.    Chocolate
brownies ain't gonna cut thru this, anyhoo.    Well, skip that, I'm allergic
to chocolate, anyways.

> because you are *choosing* to wallow in the ugly, sick, and
> twisted.  You could, however, make a different choice.  For example, you
> could choose to watch inspiring real-life stories instead of listening to
> interviews with serial killers over and over.

Actually, it's not the real problem here, so I'm not sure it makes a hell of
a lot of difference anymore.
Jess - 26 Jun 2006 06:51 GMT
> Actually, it's not the real problem here, so I'm not sure it makes a hell
> of
> a lot of difference anymore.

I can't think of a tactful way to ask this, so what the hell.

Are you still on your antidepressants, and what are you doing besides
sitting around watching Law&Order reruns and reading newsgroups?

Jess
Bill in Co. - 26 Jun 2006 07:22 GMT
>> Actually, it's not the real problem here, so I'm not sure it makes a hell
>> of a lot of difference anymore.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Jess

Yes, I'm still on an AD, no, I'm not watching Law&Order reruns.   I'm
watching Forensic Files and Cold Case Files.    And working on audio files.

Don't worry about being tactful or not - I think I'm already past that
point, so it doesn't matter much anymore.
Jess - 26 Jun 2006 17:29 GMT
> Yes, I'm still on an AD, no, I'm not watching Law&Order reruns.   I'm
> watching Forensic Files and Cold Case Files.    And working on audio
> files.
>
> Don't worry about being tactful or not - I think I'm already past that
> point, so it doesn't matter much anymore.

You need to find something to do besides griping on this newsgroup and
watching Hollywood murder shows that make you even more depressed.

Does where you live have a senior (senior being 50 and older, btw) center
that does free social-type activities?

Jess
Bill in Co. - 26 Jun 2006 18:32 GMT
>> Yes, I'm still on an AD, no, I'm not watching Law&Order reruns.   I'm
>> watching Forensic Files and Cold Case Files.    And working on audio
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Jess

I don't know.   The better solution for me, if there is one, is probably to
get back into teaching again somewhere.    And who knows, it may still
happen.
Zorra - 26 Jun 2006 19:26 GMT
> I don't know.   The better solution for me, if there is one, is
> probably to
> get back into teaching again somewhere.    And who knows, it may
> still
> happen.

You could combine the two.  If you teach a class or two at the
lifelong learning center, you might actually made a few friends.  It
would be something to keep you busy until a new position came along.

Zorra
Emma Anne - 26 Jun 2006 21:01 GMT
> You need to find something to do besides griping on this newsgroup and
> watching Hollywood murder shows that make you even more depressed.

Agreed.  Go contribute in some way.  Or make something.  Or grow
something.
Tai - 26 Jun 2006 09:04 GMT
>> Actually, it's not the real problem here, so I'm not sure it makes a
>> hell of
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Are you still on your antidepressants, and what are you doing besides
> sitting around watching Law&Order reruns and reading newsgroups?

....and telling transparently sad stories that tug on the heart strings of
the nicer ladies of the group?

Tai
(not nice and not easily manipulated these days)
Lauri - 26 Jun 2006 14:39 GMT
>> Are you still on your antidepressants, and what are you doing besides
>> sitting around watching Law&Order reruns and reading newsgroups?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Tai
>(not nice and not easily manipulated these days)

You are too nice.  Just because you're not easily manipulated doesn't
make  you "not nice".  It makes you smart and nice!

Lauri in WA
Bill in Co. - 26 Jun 2006 18:34 GMT
>>> Are you still on your antidepressants, and what are you doing besides
>>> sitting around watching Law&Order reruns and reading newsgroups?
>>
>> ....and telling transparently sad stories that tug on the heart strings
of
>> the nicer ladies of the group?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Lauri in WA

Yeah but, alas, I still haven't been able to reach your state of serenity
yet, Lauri.  But I'm getting there.    Just give me a little more time!
Tai - 27 Jun 2006 04:10 GMT
>> Tai
>> (not nice and not easily manipulated these days)
>
> You are too nice.  Just because you're not easily manipulated doesn't
> make  you "not nice".  It makes you smart and nice!

Thanks for the compliment, Lauri!

I have too much of an acerbic side to me to ever be truly nice but I'm not
interested in changing that anyway... ;)

Tai
Bill in Co. - 27 Jun 2006 04:14 GMT
>>> Tai
>>> (not nice and not easily manipulated these days)
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Tai

So it seems!     Are you boasting about THAT?      (Geesh, and I thought I
was bad)
La Mer - 26 Jun 2006 15:42 GMT
> >> Actually, it's not the real problem here, so I'm not sure it makes a
> >> hell of
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Tai
> (not nice and not easily manipulated these days)

I've kind of been wondering if something has been going on with you
lately, but figured I'd be hit with it's just me being overly
sensitive.  Are you okay?
Bill in Co. - 26 Jun 2006 18:29 GMT
>>>> Actually, it's not the real problem here, so I'm not sure it makes a
>>>> hell of a lot of difference anymore.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> lately, but figured I'd be hit with it's just me being overly
> sensitive.  Are you okay?

Nah, sounds like she's tired of all this "manipulation these days".
Tai - 27 Jun 2006 04:30 GMT
>> Tai
>> (not nice and not easily manipulated these days)
>
> I've kind of been wondering if something has been going on with you
> lately, but figured I'd be hit with it's just me being overly
> sensitive.  Are you okay?

Yep, I'm fine thanks, La Mer. :) I wasn't aware that I've been any different
but I could have been, I suppose!

I had an operation on my 'innards' the Friday before last and had 18 hours
of a three night stay in the ICU because my blood pressure was too low. I
only just avoided exploratory surgery that night because I felt and looked
very well despite the low BP. In the end the surgeon put it down to a slight
allergic reaction to one of the anaesthesia drugs. However, the operation
was a success and not especially serious anyway. When I came home last week
I was on some pretty strong pain killers and I'm still a bit sore and very
tired from the general anaesthetic but I'm recovering well and my spirits
have been very high all through it.

My husband has been wonderful through this whole time  - he's looked after
our home and children and me with his usual love and care. For example, on
the morning after my operation he brought our children to see me in the
morning in the ICU then again in the afternoon when I was on the ward again
and then came to see me by himself after dinner because he wanted to spend
some time alone with me even though at that point I was still falling asleep
for 30 seconds at a time in mid-sentence.

It's possible that as a result of seeing my husband unerringly do what's
best for us all I'm feeling less tolerant than usual of some of the
resentments, misunderstandings and trivial irritations I've seen reported in
here lately from various people both in their own behaviour and that of
their spouse.

Tai
WhansaMi - 27 Jun 2006 04:34 GMT
> >> Tai
> >> (not nice and not easily manipulated these days)
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> tired from the general anaesthetic but I'm recovering well and my spirits
> have been very high all through it.

Yikes!  Scary!  I'm glad it all worked out, and you are feeling better.

Sheila
Tai - 27 Jun 2006 04:51 GMT
> Yikes!  Scary!  I'm glad it all worked out, and you are feeling
> better.

Thanks! I'm now wondering if I'm coming down with a UTI from the urinary
catheter but I have a cold so I'm hoping it might just be that.  Plus it's
darn cold here at the moment and throroughly miserable outside!

Tai
Lauri - 27 Jun 2006 04:47 GMT
>I had an operation on my 'innards' the Friday before last and had 18 hours
>of a three night stay in the ICU because my blood pressure was too low. I
>only just avoided exploratory surgery that night because I felt and looked
>very well despite the low BP

Eeeek!  I'm glad you're OK...sounds like it was a little bit scary !

>It's possible that as a result of seeing my husband unerringly do what's
>best for us all I'm feeling less tolerant than usual of some of the
>resentments, misunderstandings and trivial irritations I've seen reported in
>here lately from various people both in their own behaviour and that of
>their spouse.

That's a very good point, and worth remembering.  I think that most
people, most of the time, are doing their very best to be good people,
good friends, good partners.

Lauri in WA
Tai - 27 Jun 2006 04:56 GMT
>> I had an operation on my 'innards' the Friday before last and had 18
>> hours of a three night stay in the ICU because my blood pressure was
>> too low. I only just avoided exploratory surgery that night because
>> I felt and looked very well despite the low BP
>
> Eeeek!  I'm glad you're OK...sounds like it was a little bit scary !

Scarier in hindsight, I think. At the time I was doped up on morphine and
not feeling as if there was anything wrong with me. :þ

>> It's possible that as a result of seeing my husband unerringly do
>> what's best for us all I'm feeling less tolerant than usual of some
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> people, most of the time, are doing their very best to be good people,
> good friends, good partners.

Yep. Thanks, Lauri. :)

Tai
cailleach@hotmail.co.uk - 27 Jun 2006 20:38 GMT
Hope you are fully recovered soon Tai!

Cailleach

> >> I had an operation on my 'innards' the Friday before last and had 18
> >> hours of a three night stay in the ICU because my blood pressure was
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Tai
Tai - 28 Jun 2006 00:32 GMT
> Hope you are fully recovered soon Tai!

Thanks, Cailleach. :)
StephanieTheGoofy - 27 Jun 2006 13:23 GMT
> >> Tai
> >> (not nice and not easily manipulated these days)
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> tired from the general anaesthetic but I'm recovering well and my spirits
> have been very high all through it.

Tai, I hope you are fully recovered very soon.

> My husband has been wonderful through this whole time  - he's looked after
> our home and children and me with his usual love and care. For example, on
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Tai
Tai - 27 Jun 2006 13:38 GMT
> Tai, I hope you are fully recovered very soon.

Thanks, Steph. :)

I'm feeling pretty good but the itching from my healing incisions is driving
me nuts at the moment! And somehow I took a nap from about 6pm to 9pm this
evening and I swear I just sat down on the bed to sort through the snail
mail and open a few envelopes.

Tai
DrLith - 28 Jun 2006 04:37 GMT
> I had an operation on my 'innards' the Friday before last and had 18 hours
> of a three night stay in the ICU because my blood pressure was too low. I
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> My husband has been wonderful through this whole time  - he's looked after
> our home and children and me with his usual love and care.

Yeek! I'm glad to see you're on the mend, and also that your gem of a
husband has done such a good job looking after you and everything else
that needs looking after. Hugs to you and yours....
Tai - 28 Jun 2006 06:06 GMT
> Yeek! I'm glad to see you're on the mend, and also that your gem of a
> husband has done such a good job looking after you and everything else
> that needs looking after. Hugs to you and yours....

Thanks, Kathy. :)

Tai
Joy - 27 Jun 2006 04:58 GMT
>> That's nonsense.  It may give you some insight into the thought process
>> of
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> Because that's how I feel.

So it is OK to choose to do something unhealthy because you feel like it?
I'm pretty sure I've heard you ranting against that....
Bill in Co. - 27 Jun 2006 06:04 GMT
>>> That's nonsense.  It may give you some insight into the thought process
>>> of the sick and twisted, perhaps.  This is a far, far cry from "the true
>>> potential of mankind at his core level".  Since when do serial killers
get
>>> to represent mankind in the first place?  And why on earth would you
think
>>> they were any more representative of the true potential of mankind than
>>> people who are doing *good* things?  Why would you think a serial killer
>>> was more representative of the true potential of mankind than, say, a
musician
>>> or an athlete or a teacher or an explorer or an astronaut or an
engineer, or
>>> anybody who aspires to something good?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>>
>>>> You know, it truly is an eye-opener on the aberrant nature, potential,
and
>>>> capabilities of mankind.    So it just seems to reinforce (and perhaps
>>>> justify, in some weird sense, I dunno) my current feelings of despair.
>>>
>>> No kidding.  Of *course* wallowing in the thoughts of the sick and
twisted
>>> would reinforce your feelings of despair.  That would be the expected end
>>> result.  I'd disagree with the word justify, however.
>>>
>>> You're lacking balance here.  Wallowing in bad stuff and ignoring the
good
>>> *will* lead to despair - but it is a *choice*.  You, Bill, are
*choosing* to
>>> live in despair,
>>
>> Because that's how I feel.
>
> So it is OK to choose to do something unhealthy because you feel like it?

I feel trapped - and I guess in my own prison.   That's all.    (At which
point you'd probably say, "well, get out of it!").

Perhaps an analogy here might be like expecting someone to lose 100 lbs, or
to quit smoking (after having smoked all their life), or to quit their
heroin habit (after having been an addict for most of their life), or to
quit eating chocolate for the rest of their life.    I feel it's kinda at
that level.

> I'm pretty sure I've heard you ranting against that....

The problem is not that I'm "doing something unhealthy", as I see it.    The
problem is I'm not really doing anything.    There is a distinction here;
what I'm saying is that the programs aren't the real problem here; they're
more like the symptoms.   Perhaps an analogy would be, if someone had
measles or cold sores, and you tried "excising" the sores, you're really not
doing anything - well, actually in that case you would truly aggravate it,
but you know what I mean)

And then ... Caren asks me about "a purpose"....

Sorry, I don't have any answers.
Joy - 27 Jun 2006 13:14 GMT
>>>> That's nonsense.  It may give you some insight into the thought process
>>>> of the sick and twisted, perhaps.  This is a far, far cry from "the
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>
> Perhaps an analogy here might be like expecting someone to lose 100 lbs,

No - the analogy here would be expecting someone who needed to lose 100
pounds to start making healthier food choices - perhaps to start exchanging
salad for fried vegetables on their plate, etc.

or
> to quit smoking (after having smoked all their life), or to quit their
> heroin habit (after having been an addict for most of their life), or to
> quit eating chocolate for the rest of their life.    I feel it's kinda at
> that level.

I don't see how suggesting that a depressed person stop wallowing in shows
about serial killers is in any way analogous to quitting smoking or heroin.
I think that is totally bogus, Bill.  And the chocolate?  Still bogus.
Never said you should never watch another true crime show again.  I said you
should start making some better choices about what to focus your attention
on - its analogous to the exchanging salad for fried vegetables argument
above.  For every serial killer interview you watch and rewatch, maybe you
should make yourself watch something uplifting as well - just to keep a
balanced diet.  Balance is good.

>> I'm pretty sure I've heard you ranting against that....
>
> The problem is not that I'm "doing something unhealthy", as I see it.
> The
> problem is I'm not really doing anything.

That's like saying the person who is 100 pounds over weight really isn't
doing anything by eating another cupcake.  Yes, you are.  You are focusing
your attention on the negative, on the sick and twisted.  Watching an
interview with a serial killer over and over really is "doing something".
Watching something uplifting would be the equivalent of the overweight
person taking a walk around the block.  It won't take 100 pounds off them -
but done regularly enough, it would help them be healthier than they would
have been otherwise.

 There is a distinction here;
> what I'm saying is that the programs aren't the real problem here; they're
> more like the symptoms.   Perhaps an analogy would be, if someone had
> measles or cold sores, and you tried "excising" the sores, you're really
> not
> doing anything - well, actually in that case you would truly aggravate it,
> but you know what I mean)

Or another analogy would be for a person who had an outbreak of poison ivy,
to go outside and lie in the poison ivy bed.  Avoiding the poison ivy bed
won't cure the itch, but lying down in it again will extend it and make it
worse.
Bill in Co. - 27 Jun 2006 20:35 GMT
>>>>> That's nonsense.  It may give you some insight into the thought process
>>>>> of the sick and twisted, perhaps.  This is a far, far cry from "the
>>>>> true
>>>>> potential of mankind at his core level".  Since when do serial killers
get
>>>>> to represent mankind in the first place?  And why on earth would you
think
>>>>> they were any more representative of the true potential of mankind than
>>>>> people who are doing *good* things?  Why would you think a serial
>>>>> killer
>>>>> was more representative of the true potential of mankind than, say, a
>>>>> musician or an athlete or a teacher or an explorer or an astronaut or
an
>>>>> engineer, or anybody who aspires to something good?
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>>>>>
>>>>> No kidding.  Of *course* wallowing in the thoughts of the sick and
twisted
>>>>> would reinforce your feelings of despair.  That would be the expected
end
>>>>> result.  I'd disagree with the word justify, however.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're lacking balance here.  Wallowing in bad stuff and ignoring the
good
>>>>> *will* lead to despair - but it is a *choice*.  You, Bill, are
*choosing*
>>>>> to live in despair,
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> should make yourself watch something uplifting as well - just to keep a
> balanced diet.  Balance is good.

OK, look, there IS some balance here - it's not all one sided.    I've been
meticulously restoring some of these old 1940's (and quite romantic)
shortwave radio broadcasts, called  "Command Performance" (which were
broadcasted for the troups overseas, and were put on for free by the
Hollywood performers back then), and, it's just SO lovely ...... just
listening to these spectacular radio broadcasts by Betty Grable, Bing
Crosby, Judy Garland, Carmen Miranda, Dinah Shore, Glenn Miller, Gracie
Allen, Jack Benny, etc, etc, etc.

>>> I'm pretty sure I've heard you ranting against that....
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>> more like the symptoms.   Perhaps an analogy would be, if someone had
>> measles or cold sores, and you tried "excising" the sores, you're really
not
>> doing anything - well, actually in that case you would truly aggravate it,
>> but you know what I mean)
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> won't cure the itch, but lying down in it again will extend it and make it
> worse.
Joy - 28 Jun 2006 04:01 GMT
>> I think that is totally bogus, Bill.  And the chocolate?  Still bogus.
>> Never said you should never watch another true crime show again.  I said
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Crosby, Judy Garland, Carmen Miranda, Dinah Shore, Glenn Miller, Gracie
> Allen, Jack Benny, etc, etc, etc.

This is less balanced than you might think, though, given that you have a
"the world is going to hell in a handbasket but the 40s and 50s were
nirvana" thing going on :-)  Don't you think that there could possibly be a
correlation between that and having your biggest dose of "good stuff" come
from that era?

I'm proposing that you make a point of watching uplifting *contemporary*
programs and movies, too.  I really think it would do you some good.
Perhaps it would be analogous to taking your vitamins!  That said, I
personally don't watch enough  TV to make a lot of recommendations, though
I'd expect your TV guide to be useful.  Perhaps some of the others here can
suggest some programming?
La Mer - 28 Jun 2006 04:37 GMT
> >> I think that is totally bogus, Bill.  And the chocolate?  Still bogus.
> >> Never said you should never watch another true crime show again.  I said
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> I'd expect your TV guide to be useful.  Perhaps some of the others here can
> suggest some programming?

PBS and the Discovery Channel are pretty safe bets and NO commercials!
There is a show that I have watched for years, although it's not on
often anymore and it's called Keeping Up Appearances.  It is hilarious!
Allen the Ancient - 28 Jun 2006 08:13 GMT
Bill,

Discovery Channel is great -- they have a show called Mythbusters that
my children love, and the shows I saw were *very* well done. They take
things "everybody knows" (for some version of everybody) and test them.

Animal Planet also has some good shows--great when you're feeling
overwhelmed with people.

Both of these are more fun to watch than the crime shows on A&E or the
History Channel, and much more uplifting!

Now, if they ever re-run the Nero Wolfe shows on A&E .... :-)

Allie

Signature

Allen the Ancient

Remove "nospamplease." to reply

Emma Anne - 28 Jun 2006 18:08 GMT
> That said, I
> personally don't watch enough  TV to make a lot of recommendations, though
> I'd expect your TV guide to be useful.  Perhaps some of the others here can
> suggest some programming?

Not me, as I watch practically no TV.  What about reading, Bill?  What
do you like?  Sci fi?
Bill in Co. - 28 Jun 2006 18:50 GMT
>> That said, I
>> personally don't watch enough  TV to make a lot of recommendations, though
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Not me, as I watch practically no TV.  What about reading, Bill?  What
> do you like?  Sci fi?

Haven't been doing much reading.    (I guess I'd rather just "drop
everything" and disappear into the TV).
Emma Anne - 29 Jun 2006 16:59 GMT
> >> That said, I
> >> personally don't watch enough  TV to make a lot of recommendations,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Haven't been doing much reading.    (I guess I'd rather just "drop
> everything" and disappear into the TV).

I know.  But I think some reading might be just the thing.  Fun, light
reading for enjoyment, not gritty police procedurals.  :-)
Zorra - 25 Jun 2006 15:54 GMT
> No, I haven't watched it.    I can't stand most of that fluffy or
> immoral
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> things
> more in perspective.   (Need that dose of reality check).

Maybe you wouldn't have such a bleak outlook if you weren't always
immersing yourself in the worst of humanity today.

Zorra
Bill in Co. - 25 Jun 2006 20:03 GMT
>> No, I haven't watched it.    I can't stand most of that fluffy or immoral
>> junk on TV today.    So instead I watch Cold Case Files, American
Justice,
>> Forensic Files, and many of the A&E documentaries, to try to keep things
>> more in perspective.   (Need that dose of reality check).
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Zorra

Well, as I said to Joy just now (I'll repeat it - if you have any brilliant
insight, lay it on me, but I think its almost hopeless, or at least I feel
that way most days)

Well, see, it gives me some more insight into the true potential of mankind
at his core level.   And especially, the interviews with the serial killers.
I just sit there listening to them, over and over and over again, completely
stunned, even now, almost beyond belief and comprehension.    But I still
can't get really into their minds - not really.

You know, it truly is an eye-opener on the aberrant nature, potential, and
capabilities of mankind.    So it just seems to reinforce (and perhaps
justify, in some weird sense, I dunno) my current feelings of despair.    So
in a sense, I guess, at least I was right about something there.   (If this
doesn't make a lot of sense to you, I wouldn't be surprised - logic
evidently isn't involved here).
Barbara Didrichsen - 19 Jun 2006 11:22 GMT
>DH's flashes of anger are getting more frequent.  Two days ago he
>noticed that the mouse on the kids' computer was "broken."  It's true
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>Well, I won't actually do it.  I never do, do I?  But damn, I'm
>beginning to think it's just a matter of time before I have no choice.

If a couple of months sounds too scary, how about a couple of weeks?

I had an opportunity to take an enforced vacation from my marriage 10+
years ago when my company offered me a 6 month assignment in China.  I
was not able to bring my then husband or son with me.  As hard as it
was to be separated from my child, I have to say -- that time was a
gift.  Away from the turmoil and chaos of my marriage, I was finally
able to establish an emotionally healthy life for myself.

Well -- you know how this story ends.  I left him.  I'm not saying you
should or will.  But the value of taking time away from the marriage
to create a safe, emotionally healthy place for yourself is something
I would encourage you to consider.  Throwing things in a rage, whether
intending to hit another or not, is a sign of someone who is out of
control.  You might be doing him a huge favor as well by clearing out
of Dodge for awhile.

You deserve to feel safe, Zorra.  Not just physically but emotionally.
It is not too much to ask for.

Barb, who's been there
Stephanie Stowe - 19 Jun 2006 12:55 GMT
> DH's flashes of anger are getting more frequent.  Two days ago he
> noticed that the mouse on the kids' computer was "broken."  It's true
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> the filter needed cleaning.  But again, he went ballistic.  This time
> he threw the vacuum, and it ended up hitting me and the dog.

At this point you say, Get Out. Come back when you are in a state not to be
a threat to other people in this house.

> I'm....not exactly scared, but definitely disturbed.  It occurred to
> me that with this being the summer, we have the opportunity to just
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Zorra
Bill in Co. - 19 Jun 2006 15:48 GMT
>> DH's flashes of anger are getting more frequent.  Two days ago he
>> noticed that the mouse on the kids' computer was "broken."  It's true
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> At this point you say, Get Out. Come back when you are in a state not to be
> a threat to other people in this house.

Good call, Steph.    And she needs to say it with conviction.    And he
needs to hear it, and (apparently) grow up a bit, and start acting more like
an adult!   Or rather, as an adult should act, since many so called "adults"
today are really just children.   (Note to Zorra:  I'm saying this in
support of YOU, not to upset you).

>> I'm....not exactly scared, but definitely disturbed.  It occurred to
>> me that with this being the summer, we have the opportunity to just
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>
>> Zorra
Zorra - 21 Jun 2006 02:39 GMT
> At this point you say, Get Out. Come back when you are in a state
> not to be
> a threat to other people in this house.

I just don't understand how I'd get him to leave.  He wouldn't.  He
hasn't, in fact, when I've tried to take a stand.  It would take
waiting for him to do something bad enough to call the police about
(which I think/hope will never happen), or having the locks changed
while he was out of the house.

So when you say things like this, I just scratch my head and think,
"That actually works with some people?  You say, 'Get out.' and they
do?"

Zorra
Stephanie Stowe - 21 Jun 2006 13:06 GMT
> > At this point you say, Get Out. Come back when you are in a state
> > not to be
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> (which I think/hope will never happen), or having the locks changed
> while he was out of the house

Maybe I have an altered sense of reality. But in my world, throwing vacuum
cleaners is pretty much there for me. If it took a call to the police to
keep flying giant appliances away from my children, then so be it.
.

> So when you say things like this, I just scratch my head and think,
> "That actually works with some people?  You say, 'Get out.' and they
> do?"
>
> Zorra
Emma Anne - 21 Jun 2006 16:55 GMT
> > > At this point you say, Get Out. Come back when you are in a state
> > > not to be
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> keep flying giant appliances away from my children, then so be it.
> .

This is my sense of reality too.
Bill in Co. - 21 Jun 2006 21:56 GMT
>>>> At this point you say, Get Out. Come back when you are in a state
>>>> not to be
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> This is my sense of reality too.

Yup - thirded!    If you don't nip this in the bud (and it sounds like it's
gotten way past that), then.....
Zorra - 21 Jun 2006 21:26 GMT
> Maybe I have an altered sense of reality. But in my world, throwing
> vacuum
> cleaners is pretty much there for me. If it took a call to the
> police to
> keep flying giant appliances away from my children, then so be it.

Here's the thing.  I always said, "The moment a man lays a hand on me
or my children, I'm outta here!"  Pretty typical attitude.  But when
you think that, you have a picture in your head of the angry ogre, the
cowering wife, the kids hiding in their rooms with their heads under
the covers.

Then you have real life.  You have a man that you fell in love with,
that you have memories and history with.  And he's not some angry
ogre, he's the crumbling, stressed-out, *hurting* version of the man
you fell in love with.  And aside from that 15 seconds of anger, life
goes on pretty much as usual.  My son isn't hiding under the covers
right now, he's at camp with his dad, who just spent the day with him
fishing and learning to shoot, and playing games.  And then it isn't
so black and white.  And when you throw in that he *didn't* hit
anyone, just threw something in frustration, it blurs even more.  He
might have been quite shocked that it ended up landing on the bed and
hitting us.

I've started the process to get my daughter into therapy.  I told them
some of the family dynamics, including his anger.  The "screener" on
the phone said that as the entire family is being affected, they'll
likely want to meet with all of us.  I'm really hoping that perhaps
this will be the thing that finally gets him the help I believe he
needs too.

Zorra
Bill in Co. - 21 Jun 2006 21:58 GMT
>> Maybe I have an altered sense of reality. But in my world, throwing
>> vacuum
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> you fell in love with.  And aside from that 15 seconds of anger, life
> goes on pretty much as usual.

You're rationalizing this away, Zorra.  (sorry to be so blunt, but that's
the Truth)

> My son isn't hiding under the covers
> right now, he's at camp with his dad, who just spent the day with him
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Zorra
Zorra - 23 Jun 2006 04:32 GMT
> You're rationalizing this away, Zorra.  (sorry to be so blunt, but
> that's
> the Truth)

You don't need to worry about being blunt.

You know that "How long do I wait?" thread?  And people would tell the
guy things like, "Or if she's completely alone living in a dump of an
apartment, while trying to figure out how she's going to be able to
afford rent for an apartment large enough to host her children on her
custody days, maybe it will enable her to stew in her juices and come
to her senses?"

Life is a known bad now with some good thrown in.  Life would be an
unknown bad if I were to leave.

Zorra
Bill in Co. - 23 Jun 2006 05:14 GMT
>> You're rationalizing this away, Zorra.  (sorry to be so blunt, but
>> that's the Truth)
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> custody days, maybe it will enable her to stew in her juices and come
> to her senses?"

I don't remember that, fortunately.    And that's a really disgusting thing
to say, so I'm glad I don't remember it.   But then again, with a lot of
society, nothing really surprises me too much anymore.   One just has to
lower one's expectations to the subbasement level, and then one can't be
disappointed anymore.   (Or so I've heard).

> Life is a known bad now with some good thrown in.  Life would be an
> unknown bad if I were to leave.
>
> Zorra

It would be an "unknown", and probably an unknown hardship, but I don't
think it would be an unknown "bad".    What you have now doesn't sound good
at all.
Zorra - 23 Jun 2006 05:41 GMT
>>> You're rationalizing this away, Zorra.  (sorry to be so blunt, but
>>> that's the Truth)
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> disgusting thing
> to say, so I'm glad I don't remember it.

Well, this woman was conducting an emotional affair right in her
husband's face, and plotting to make it physical as soon as possible,
so I don't think people were feeling charitably disposed towards her.
Nonetheless, that doesn't make that possible scenario any less likely
for me.

Zorra
Stephanie Stowe - 21 Jun 2006 22:29 GMT
> > Maybe I have an altered sense of reality. But in my world, throwing
> > vacuum
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> ogre, he's the crumbling, stressed-out, *hurting* version of the man
> you fell in love with.

Zorra, I hate to tell you this. You sound *exactly* like the woman
explaining her years of abuse, in her case massive physical abuse, who was
giving an orientation talk at the shelter for abused women I used to
volunteer at. The striking thing is, in her case the difficulties began with
flying objects.

> And aside from that 15 seconds of anger, life
> goes on pretty much as usual.  My son isn't hiding under the covers
> right now, he's at camp with his dad, who just spent the day with him
> fishing and learning to shoot, and playing games.  And then it isn't
> so black and white.  And when you throw in that he *didn't* hit
> anyone, just threw something in frustration, it blurs even more.

Abuse / not abuse. Who cares? Throwing a freaking vaccum cleaner (not a
spong for pete's sake) is simply not ok. He can't get his head out of his
a.s to learn ways to cope with stress. If you think these episodes of 15
seconds of anger plus his normal snotty sour attitude is not affecting the
kids, you are mistaken. Is not cowering under the covers the standard you
really had in mind when you brought your children into this world?

This sounds harsh. I am sorry. But the idea that you have to wait until he
actually hits someone before you do something serious to end this madness is
just beyond my comprehension. Except that I have seen it before.

> He
> might have been quite shocked that it ended up landing on the bed and
> hitting us.

He might have been? He didn't *say* anything to you about it afterward? Did
you act like this was same ol' same ol'?

> I've started the process to get my daughter into therapy.  I told them
> some of the family dynamics, including his anger.  The "screener" on
> the phone said that as the entire family is being affected, they'll
> likely want to meet with all of us.  I'm really hoping that perhaps
> this will be the thing that finally gets him the help I believe he
> needs too.

Yeah but the problem isn't him, i it? Someone else can't help someone who
does not want help. Good luck though. I hope you are right and I am wrong.

> Zorra
Zorra - 23 Jun 2006 04:36 GMT
> "Zorra" <zorra@adelphia.net> wrote in message
>> He might have been quite shocked that it ended up landing on the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> afterward? Did
> you act like this was same ol' same ol'?

No, he didn't say anything.  He can act like such a jerk, and then
later act like nothing happened. I don't think he could even admit to
himself that he'd done anything wrong.

> Yeah but the problem isn't him, i it? Someone else can't help
> someone who
> does not want help. Good luck though. I hope you are right and I am
> wrong.

I've heard that, and in that case I'm really screwed, as DD doesn't
want help either.

Zorra
La Mer - 23 Jun 2006 04:59 GMT
> "Stephanie Stowe" <notgonnadoit@ihatespam.com> wrote in message

> > Yeah but the problem isn't him, i it? Someone else can't help
> > someone who
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Zorra

Your daughter is _appropriately_  too young to know what she wants.
Your husband, on the other hand,  is old enough to know better.  I'd
venture to guess that there's more hope for her future than there is
for his.
Bill in Co. - 23 Jun 2006 05:18 GMT
>> "Stephanie Stowe" <notgonnadoit@ihatespam.com> wrote in message
>
>>> Yeah but the problem isn't him, i it? Someone else can't help someone
who
>>> does not want help. Good luck though. I hope you are right and I am
>>> wrong.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> venture to guess that there's more hope for her future than there is
> for his.

I agree.
So what possible pragmatic solution ideas can you think of?   (and yeah I
know the generic response here..... "I'm not her, it's not my problem; it's
for her to figure out", etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc)
Zorra - 23 Jun 2006 05:43 GMT
>> "Stephanie Stowe" <notgonnadoit@ihatespam.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> venture to guess that there's more hope for her future than there is
> for his.

I hope so.  I'm supposed to call tomorrow to set up an appointment for
an evaluation.  Then I will get some professional feedback on whether
she really needs help, or if I'm just overwhelmed and projecting onto
her.

Zorra
jwb - 21 Jun 2006 23:11 GMT
> Then you have real life.  You have a man that you fell in love with, that
> you have memories and history with.  And he's not some angry ogre, he's
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> frustration, it blurs even more.  He might have been quite shocked that it
> ended up landing on the bed and hitting us.

I think you're thinking about this the right way.

This is one of those issues that gets a huge reaction (and many times blown
way out of proportion) at the mere mention of it. The minute anyone posts
that a husband was angry or threw something, it escalates into 'you're in
danger'.

I've gotten angry at stuff (usually work) and went out into the garage and
beat the ever living sh.t out of my heavy bag. If I didn't have that, I
might have thrown something - does this mean I'm going to beat my wife?
Doubtful (have never hit a girl.)

what is the source of his stress?
Emma Anne - 21 Jun 2006 23:23 GMT
> > Then you have real life.  You have a man that you fell in love with, that
> > you have memories and history with.  And he's not some angry ogre, he's
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> might have thrown something - does this mean I'm going to beat my wife?
> Doubtful (have never hit a girl.)

I really, really hope you are right, jwb, and you might be.  I once
slammed a door so hard I broke the frame, and I never went on to hit
anyone either.

I am reactring strongly in this case for two reasons.  First, Mr. Zorra
strikes me as a person who has very little empathy for anyone outside
himself.  It is all about him.  If he has a temper tantrum it is because
"someone made him mad."  Whatever he does is entirely justified.  This
seems very much like the type of person who might become abusive.

Second, it seems like a progression.  First nasty comments, then angry
outbursts, then throwing things - the latest of which was quite heavy
and did in fact hit someone.

If I were in this situation I'd at least have an escape plan in place in
case it's going where I fear it is going.
jwb - 22 Jun 2006 00:04 GMT
>> > Then you have real life.  You have a man that you fell in love with,
>> > that
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> "someone made him mad."  Whatever he does is entirely justified.  This
> seems very much like the type of person who might become abusive.

well, we are also only getting one side. No offense to Zorra.

> Second, it seems like a progression.  First nasty comments, then angry
> outbursts, then throwing things - the latest of which was quite heavy
> and did in fact hit someone.
>
> If I were in this situation I'd at least have an escape plan in place in
> case it's going where I fear it is going.

I don't think it's going anywhere. But of course, that's just my (fairly
worthless) opinion
Zorra - 22 Jun 2006 03:57 GMT
>> I am reactring strongly in this case for two reasons.  First, Mr.
>> Zorra
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> well, we are also only getting one side. No offense to Zorra.

None taken.  If he posted here, he would have a lot of complaints
about me.  I don't cook or clean well enough, I don't initiate sex,
I'm too lax with the kids, etc.  But going by what he has said in
therapy (not recently), he wouldn't dispute anything I've said about
him.  He acknowledges that I give an accurate view of him.  I think
that really surprised my therapist the one time he spoke to him.

Zorra
Bill in Co. - 22 Jun 2006 04:00 GMT
>>> I am reactring strongly in this case for two reasons.  First, Mr. Zorra
>>> strikes me as a person who has very little empathy for anyone outside
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> about me.  I don't cook or clean well enough, I don't initiate sex,
> I'm too lax with the kids, etc.

Which is completely irrelevant to the case of abuse!   Completely
IRRELEVANT!!

> But going by what he has said in
> therapy (not recently), he wouldn't dispute anything I've said about
> him.  He acknowledges that I give an accurate view of him.  I think
> that really surprised my therapist the one time he spoke to him.
>
> Zorra
Tai - 22 Jun 2006 04:14 GMT
>>> I am reactring strongly in this case for two reasons.  First, Mr.
>>> Zorra
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> him.  He acknowledges that I give an accurate view of him.  I think
> that really surprised my therapist the one time he spoke to him.

Have you brought it up again how frightening you found his recent loss of
control when he was angry? Particularly the context of it being part of
pattern of disrespect and unkindness where his family is concerned. I think
you need to start being firmer about expecting changes from him, Zorra.
Perhaps this would be a good time to take the kids away for a break from his
ill-temper, as you suggested, and make it perfectly plain that's what you're
doing and that you plan to use the time to get some perspective on whether
you can continue to allow your home life to be so unpleasant.

Tai
Zorra - 23 Jun 2006 05:05 GMT
> Have you brought it up again how frightening you found his recent
> loss of control when he was angry? Particularly the context of it
> being part of pattern of disrespect and unkindness where his family
> is concerned. I think you need to start being firmer about expecting
> changes from him, Zorra.

This week was scout camp.  I went the first two days, he went the
second two.  I told him that if he expected me to help him get the
kids ready on his days, he'd have to help me on mine.  He got up the
first day and sat drinking coffee and only sullenly doing exactly what
I asked him to do, no more.  The second day he didn't bother to get up
at all.

So on his days, I got up the first day and helped get ready.  On the
second day I intended to sleep in.  But as I was awake, it did seem
silly and vindictive not to help, so I went downstairs.  As soon as I
got there, he took his coffee to the table, sat down, glared at me and
said, "We need sandwiches."  Not, "Could you make us some sandwiches?"
Or "I've got to get DS up, could you pack lunch?"  No, it was a
command.  It was perfectly clear that he felt that it was my duty.  So
I said, "Oh, you better make some then."  He said, "Fine!  Be no
help!" and started his stomping and slamming routine.  I said, "Look,
I came and got DD early yesterday, I agreed to take her to work with
me this morning, I washed the clothes (they have swimsuits and
t-shirts that have to be washed every day), and I got DS up.  On
Tuesday you didn't even get out of bed!  I don't see how you can even
say that!"  His only response was to get even more furious.

There really is no talking to him or reasoning with him (even if he
isn't angry to start off with).  Because he never responds to me, he
doesn't even have to try to think up a rationalization for what he
does.  He just glares and mutters loaded, "Uh, huhs."  And you can see
that expecting anything from him just leads to anger.

> Perhaps this would be a good time to take the kids away for a break
> from his ill-temper, as you suggested, and make it perfectly plain
> that's what you're doing and that you plan to use the time to get
> some perspective on whether you can continue to allow your home life
> to be so unpleasant.

I'm thinking hard on this and trying to figure it out.  I have to be
back to work in a week, and the kids have plans and committments
before then.  I don't honestly know what to do.

Zorra
Tai - 23 Jun 2006 06:17 GMT
>> Have you brought it up again how frightening you found his recent
>> loss of control when he was angry? Particularly the context of it
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> does.  He just glares and mutters loaded, "Uh, huhs."  And you can see
> that expecting anything from him just leads to anger.

Your responses seem appropriate and measured to me and not at all
inflammatory.

>> Perhaps this would be a good time to take the kids away for a break
>> from his ill-temper, as you suggested, and make it perfectly plain
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> back to work in a week, and the kids have plans and committments
> before then.  I don't honestly know what to do.

You'll know when you're ready. Or, rather, you probably do know now but the
scales have to tip far enough to make it more intolerable to wait it out
rather than force the issue while you still cling to hope.

It's hard not to feel like your husband is playing some kind of horrible
brinksmanship game where he's seeing how awful he can be before you crack. I
truly don't understand people like that although I can understand someone
being vile for short periods of time when under tremendous stress or sick.
He must be thoroughly miserable himself! (Not that I care about that, of
course.)

I think that setting up your daughter's evaluation appointment is the most
pressing thing for you and perhaps some good things will come from it
eventually for your whole family as well as for your lass. I don't think
you're projecting your problems on to her - there's too much outside
feedback on that even if it is from lay people - but the tension between you
and your husband can't be helping her much so it may be that what pushes you
those last few steps is concern for her rather than for yourself. I think
you'd find that easier to justify to yourself than if you felt you were
/only/ thinking about you.

Tai
dejablues - 23 Jun 2006 20:04 GMT
>> Have you brought it up again how frightening you found his recent loss of
>> control when he was angry? Particularly the context of it being part of
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> Zorra

Have you ever seen on shows like Dr. Phil or Nightline or some such where
they set up a hidden camera and film families in crisis and later have the
family watch them with a therapist? What would he think if he saw himself on
video acting like this?
Zorra - 24 Jun 2006 00:31 GMT
> Have you ever seen on shows like Dr. Phil or Nightline or some such
> where they set up a hidden camera and film families in crisis and
> later have the family watch them with a therapist? What would he
> think if he saw himself on video acting like this?

I would like to think he'd be shocked.  In reality, I doubt it would
make a difference.

Zorra
Emma Anne - 22 Jun 2006 16:24 GMT
> > I am reactring strongly in this case for two reasons.  First, Mr. Zorra
> > strikes me as a person who has very little empathy for anyone outside
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> well, we are also only getting one side. No offense to Zorra.

Very true.

> > Second, it seems like a progression.  First nasty comments, then angry
> > outbursts, then throwing things - the latest of which was quite heavy
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I don't think it's going anywhere. But of course, that's just my (fairly
> worthless) opinion

I hope you are right.
Emma Anne - 22 Jun 2006 16:37 GMT
> > > I am reactring strongly in this case for two reasons.  First, Mr. Zorra
> > > strikes me as a person who has very little empathy for anyone outside
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> I hope you are right.

(Replying to myself)

I meant to say also that while I do see classic patterns in Mr. Zorra, I
also only see the cases where it does end up in abuse.  So I don't know
how often people go down that road and then stop.
Bill in Co. - 22 Jun 2006 19:34 GMT
>>>> I am reactring strongly in this case for two reasons.  First, Mr. Zorra
>>>> strikes me as a person who has very little empathy for anyone outside
>>>> himself.  It is all about him.  If he has a temper tantrum it is
because
>>>> "someone made him mad."  Whatever he does is entirely justified.  This
>>>> seems very much like the type of person who might become abusive.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>>>
>>>> If I were in this situation I'd at least have an escape plan in place
in
>>>> case it's going where I fear it is going.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> also only see the cases where it does end up in abuse.  So I don't know
> how often people go down that road and then stop.

You mean as in the land of Dorothy, Oz, and her magic red slippers?
La Mer - 22 Jun 2006 05:57 GMT
> > > Then you have real life.  You have a man that you fell in love with, that
> > > you have memories and history with.  And he's not some angry ogre, he's
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> If I were in this situation I'd at least have an escape plan in place in
> case it's going where I fear it is going.

What JWB does not have are children.  Mr. Zorra (hopefully) has not
physically hurt them...but if he has not already hurt them emotionally
andmentally; it's just around the corner.  Role modeling to our
children, how to deal with anger, is far more impactful than anything
that we teach our children with our words.  My 28 year old son still
remembers the time that as I went to shut the trunk, he went to stick
his hand in to get something that he forgot.  He was about 10 or
so...old enough to know better.  I screamed, caught the trunk from
closing and raised my arm as if to smack him silly (but I didn't).  We
actually both started laughing that I almost hit him for the first
time.  I did tell him that it was the stupidest thing that he had ever
done...and I never used name calling while raising my children.

Of course we typically hear the worst of the worst when Zorra comes in
here wtih some kind of new acting out issue and yeah, it's easy to over
act.  I'll guess for those of us who do react/respond the most
emotionally, are the women who are the protective bears of their little
cubs.  Don't get between a mom and her children is all I can say.

Surely we all lose our temper from time to time; that's normal and
healthy.  What's normal and healthy is to put closure on the bad
behavior.  I've tossed my keys and after I tossed them, I explained how
wrong that was and I apologized for scaring my daughter and told her I
wouldn't do it again.  We also talked about althernatives to frustion.
That's how life usually works around here when there's tension and
anxiety.  I doubt Mr. Zorra would sign up for this plan.
Stephanie Stowe - 21 Jun 2006 23:42 GMT
> > Then you have real life.  You have a man that you fell in love with, that
> > you have memories and history with.  And he's not some angry ogre, he's
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> what is the source of his stress?

jwb, there is a mountain of difference between wailing on your heavy bag and
wailing on your vaccum cleaner. Who cares about the label "abuse." Maybe my
standards are too high, but losing your noodle to such a degree that you
pitch fits that would make my preschoolers proud is just Not Ok.
jwb - 22 Jun 2006 00:02 GMT
> jwb, there is a mountain of difference between wailing on your heavy bag
> and
> wailing on your vaccum cleaner. Who cares about the label "abuse." Maybe
> my
> standards are too high, but losing your noodle to such a degree that you
> pitch fits that would make my preschoolers proud is just Not Ok.

I'm not saying it's ok. I am saying I don't think she needs to map out a
route to the safe house.
Stephanie Stowe - 22 Jun 2006 00:09 GMT
> > jwb, there is a mountain of difference between wailing on your heavy bag
> > and
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I'm not saying it's ok. I am saying I don't think she needs to map out a
> route to the safe house.

Oh. I don't think so either. There are a few more steps to be taken down the
escalation path before it comes to hitting, if it were ever to do so.
A. - 22 Jun 2006 00:14 GMT
> > Then you have real life.  You have a man that you fell in love with, that
> > you have memories and history with.  And he's not some angry ogre, he's
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> might have thrown something - does this mean I'm going to beat my wife?
> Doubtful (have never hit a girl.)

Yes, jwb, this is normal.  But had you thrown something in the
presence of your own child - and it somehow bounced into them
or into someone else, would you apologize?  Would you wait until
your spouse located your sources of stress?  Or would you try
to figure it out on your own?  If you decided not to figure it out -
or apologize - would you expect your children to grow up differently?
Would you _want_ to model this behavior, without apology or
explanation, in front of your kids?

I've thrown things too.  Then, afterwards, I have to say, "that was
really stupid.  I was completely out of touch with how pissed off
I was.  Damn.  Feel free, everyone, to remind me to pay attention
to my feelings, accept my apologies, what a jerk I was."  Etc.

Then, of course, I had to go about religiously destressing my life.

A.

> what is the source of his stress?
Zorra - 23 Jun 2006 04:41 GMT
> what is the source of his stress?

What isn't?

Other than the occasional round of golf, there isn't much of anything
in his life that makes him happy.  And even golf is turning into a
stressor as he feels that he doesn't have enough time to cram it in.

Zorra
jwb - 23 Jun 2006 05:07 GMT
>> what is the source of his stress?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> his life that makes him happy.  And even golf is turning into a stressor
> as he feels that he doesn't have enough time to cram it in.

ugh.... you need to go.
Amy Lou - 23 Jun 2006 13:27 GMT
>>> what is the source of his stress?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> ugh.... you need to go.

I reckon the source has something to do with his inability to communicate.
Zorra speaks of his uh mmms and mmMMmms so that makes me think he bottles
stuff up, builds up resentment then releases it in these totally unhealthy
ways when something sets him off.

My own husband suffers similar communication troubles. Just the other day he
went off in a ranting rave about about how intolerable it is that we house
and feed my full time working son when he comes home for the weekends. The
wierd thing is that this rant was triggered when I brought up the subject of
raising my sons board. From my perspective it seemed like he had retained
this information (his feelings)  from me and released it when I was coming
at him with the very same subject and it seemed like his reaction was
completely inappropriate. I mean he should have been showing aggreement not
anger. It was only later that I realised his reaction was in fact his
feelings the way he felt weeks ago.

Amy
A. - 22 Jun 2006 00:10 GMT
> > Maybe I have an altered sense of reality. But in my world, throwing
> > vacuum
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> might have been quite shocked that it ended up landing on the bed and
> hitting us.

Zorra, having lived with various persons who THREW THINGS, I need
to comment.  You're right.  Merely throwing something in a fit of
anger is not the "focus point."  I don't think anyone here thinks it's
the main point - but you posted about it because it concerned you.

There are many different reactions (by the Thrower) to having thrown
something.  But, as you tell the story, NONE of your husband's
reactions
are constructive or normal.  Let me list the reactions that I think
lead
to GOOD outcomes (reactions by the THROWER, not the other people):

1.  OH MY GOD.  Why did I do that?  I could have hurt someone!

2.  Did you see me do that?  I didn't mean to do that!  I just about
hit you!  (This one shows profound disassociation - but at least the
person is aware RIGHT AFTER).

3.  Okay, now I can really see I have anger management problems.
What do you think I should do?  Will you help me with this?

4.  I'm SO SORRY.  (To son):  Son, what you just saw me do is
wrong!  I am really stressed out.  I need to work on this!

5.  I'm so SORRY.  (This - by itself, is still a good start).  I don't
know why I do these things.  I feel terrible (proper assignation of
responsibility, acceptance of blame, sorrow - those are the PROPER
emotions).

And of course, there would be the more advanced reactions, such
as "Okay, I can see that my own way of trying to prevent this
from happening isn't working - what can I do?"    Your husband
refuses to see that his behavior may in fact be provoking some
bad reactions from the kids - that's not enough for him, he won't
see that he is a problem.  Throwing things IS a problem, eventually
someone MIGHT get hurt.  That's why we don't permit CHILDREN
to do it.  And here he is, permitting himself to do it (while still
disciplining the kids!)  He needs to, at the very least, step down
from his role as child disciplinarian/proper father.  If any of the
person's reactions resemble what I just wrote, it's no guarantee of
them getting better - it might still take more serious incidents, to
which
they respond more and more shamefully.  SHAMEFULLY.

If he continues to feel no apparent guilt or shame, if he continues
to resist all forms of help and change, even if it stays just at the
level it's at, it's not a good thing.

It's NOT the throwing of the vacuum that matters, it's his attitude
afterwards, his reluctance to change, and his continued insistence
on playing the role of husband/dad when in fact he's not supplying
the emotional needs of the family properly.

But, since you are bound and determined not to rock the boat
too much right now (and I totally understand that, believe me), here
are some tips - for you.  You need to continue focusing on
"babyproofing"
the environment as much as possible, which is to say, mollifying
your husband.  You need to stay calm, pick up the pieces, etc.
You need to try and anticipate what might set him off and fix it
before he sees it.  If you are doing all that you can to mollify him
and things continue to escalate (for example, to the point where
you feel you must leave), you will still only be mollifying him
(removing
the witnesses to his meltdowns) but at least he will have a sense
of who the problem might be.  Sure, he's going to blame you if
you leave and he has even more difficulties.   If you do leave, don't
be surprised if he acts out at work or elsewhere.

In other words, there's no point in trying to fix your relationship
per se, or even to get him to change.  But, if by working hard to
pacify him, he stabilizes, you'll know that the man needs a LOT
of control over his environment in order to function.  This is typical
of people fighting some underlying problem, such as depression
or a cognitive disorder.  At work, they function fairly well because
there is a hierarchy, a system of rewards and punishments, they're
usually not entirely "in charge" of the workplace.  It's at home that
they have difficulties.

I guess I'm asking you to be very aware of what YOU are doing
(pacifying him), that his behavior is infantile and now, you're
stepping
into the Mommy-role, more and more.  This will not change, it
will continue onward as it is.  Eventually, the kids will leave,
and he'll be left, with you stabilizing him and protecting him from
himself.  That's the role you're choosing right now, and it makes
sense, as you already have two other kids - why not have one
more?

Naturally, the more he does this and you mollify him, the more
he sees you as Mommy, not Wife.  Just as he probably wanted
more independence from his real mommy, he probably sees
getting away from you as a good thing.  Just as he once blamed
his real mommy for his childhood problems, he now blames you
(and now, the kids themselves).

He's a big baby - and that's not humorous, it's very sad.  You've
gotten yourself into the role of playing parent to this big baby, and
there is almost no way out of it unless he sees the light.  If you
suddenly abandon him in any way that he perceives, he's going to
have another hissy fit.  And another.

So your confusion over what to do is normal.  You have correctly
"diagnosed" his problem as a form of regression, brought on by
life stresses.  You married a better functioning guy (you seem to
say) and now he's crumbling.   But not everyone crumbles under
life's stresses and acts like a big baby - and some who do are able
to ACKNOWLEDGE afterward what dweebs they've been.  In fact,
a normal, healthy person (upon throwing a tantrum) usually fears
having another one occur, wonders what the heck is going wrong
with them, and starts casting about for help, reasons, forgiveness,
etc.

Has he ever shown any remorse for these tantrums?  Has he
ever provided his own explanation for why they occur?  Has he
ever mentioned how at odds his behavior is with what you want
from your children, in terms of behavior?

A.

> I've started the process to get my daughter into therapy.  I told them
> some of the family dynamics, including his anger.  The "screener" on
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Zorra
Zorra - 22 Jun 2006 03:54 GMT
> Zorra, having lived with various persons who THREW THINGS, I need
> to comment.  You're right.  Merely throwing something in a fit of
> anger is not the "focus point."  I don't think anyone here thinks
> it's
> the main point - but you posted about it because it concerned you.

I agree that throwing in and of itself isn't necessarily a big
problem.  I used to do it myself some as a teen.  What bothers me more
is the apparent lack of control when he does it.  Even when I threw
something, it was always something soft and/or unbreakable, and I
always knew where it was going (i.e. not into anyone).

> It's NOT the throwing of the vacuum that matters, it's his attitude
> afterwards, his reluctance to change, and his continued insistence
> on playing the role of husband/dad when in fact he's not supplying
> the emotional needs of the family properly.

I agree here too.  It really bothers me that he feels no apparent
shame for what he does.  No shame = no motivation to change or get
help.

> But, since you are bound and determined not to rock the boat
> too much right now (and I totally understand that, believe me), here
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> You need to try and anticipate what might set him off and fix it
> before he sees it.

Yep, I do that already.  Actually, come to think of it, I was doing
that before I realized that there were problems in our marriage.  I
don't know if you read about the "popcorn incident" but the short form
is that he got really angry when I spilled popcorn in a movie.  When
you get yelled at and punished every time you do something wrong, you
end up trying to hide it when you screw up.  I know it's wrong and
unhealthy and amounts to lying to your spouse, but dang it, I just
don't see that I need to open myself up to that.  The twist lately
though is that as you(?) pointed out, he's more fixated on the kids,
DD in particular.  So now I find myself jumping in to take the blame
if I can to protect them (her).

> Naturally, the more he does this and you mollify him, the more
> he sees you as Mommy, not Wife.  Just as he probably wanted
> more independence from his real mommy, he probably sees
> getting away from you as a good thing.  Just as he once blamed
> his real mommy for his childhood problems, he now blames you
> (and now, the kids themselves).

Now you're losing me.  :-)  He adores his mom.  Reveres her and keeps
her on a pedestal.  He lived at home until he graduated from college.
He doesn't think he even had any childhood problems, and I've never
heard him speak of a rebellious stage which is often indicative of a
push for independence.

> Has he ever shown any remorse for these tantrums?  Has he
> ever provided his own explanation for why they occur?  Has he
> ever mentioned how at odds his behavior is with what you want
> from your children, in terms of behavior?

No, never.  A few months after he broke the door frame he was joking
about it, and laughing.  I asked him wasn't he the least bit
embarrassed, and he said no, why should he be?  These things are all
our, usually the kids', fault.  He wouldn't have smashed the mouse if
someone hadn't busted the right button.  He wouldn't have ripped the
horse toy if DD hadn't been sassing him.  He wouldn't have thrown the
vacuum if people around here would JUST LEARN TO TAKE CARE OF THEIR
THINGS!  Even if he acknowledges that he probably shouldn't have done
it, it's followed immediately by a BUT.

Zorra
Bill in Co. - 22 Jun 2006 03:58 GMT
>> Zorra, having lived with various persons who THREW THINGS, I need
>> to comment.  You're right.  Merely throwing something in a fit of
[quoted text clipped - 67 lines]
>
> Zorra

Which simply means, he's denying owning up to it - to the responsibility.

No offense, Zorra, but these are not the (responsible) actions of an ADULT,
and you're trying to rationalize some of this is not healthy.

It still sounds like a case of abuse.     Actually, it IS abuse.   What are
you thinking about doing about it, if anything?    Or do you have any ideas
at this point?
Zorra - 22 Jun 2006 04:16 GMT
> No offense, Zorra, but these are not the (responsible) actions of an
> ADULT,
> and you're trying to rationalize some of this is not healthy.

I do realize that.  And I've said that often enough to him.  "I
understand you are frustrated, but you have to be the adult here." --  
generally in reference to an altercation between DD and him -- "You
need to stay focused on what is going to improve the situation."

> It still sounds like a case of abuse.     Actually, it IS abuse.
> What are
> you thinking about doing about it, if anything?    Or do you have
> any ideas
> at this point?

I'm not convinced it's abuse.  A while back there was a discussion
about emotional abuse.  I have a hard time with the idea of emotional
abuse.  I entered the discussion trying to tease out in my own mind
what would and would not constitute emotional abuse, and then got what
seemed like a lot of people turning it back on me and challenging me
as to why I was trying to pin an abuse label on my relationship.  The
thing is, there is a reason for labels.  They were created to denote
something.  And in this case, abuse is where someone clearly crosses
the line.  Where a situation becomes intolerable.  Where it stops
being a matter of personal preference, and becomes a situation where
it is in society's best interest to step in.  I'm sure emotional abuse
exists -- towards children, or towards the vulnerable.  But can it
really exist between a grown man and a grown woman, a woman who is not
mentally retarded, physically dependant on him, or in any other way
incapacitated?  I'm not sure.

As for what I'm doing.  Right now I'm waiting to see what if anything
comes out of my daughter's evaluation.  I'll bring these latest
incidents up with my therapist too, but that won't be for another
couple of weeks.  I will say that the stuffed horse incident that
upset me barely made him blink.

Zorra
Amy Lou - 22 Jun 2006 06:05 GMT
"Zorra" <zorra@adelphia.net> wrote in message

> As for what I'm doing.  Right now I'm waiting to see what if anything
> comes out of my daughter's evaluation.

I hope it goes well! It may just be the starting point for
DH to get the help he needs. As Dr Phil says "you can't change what you
don't acknowledge" so I'm hoping, for your sake Zorra, that somewhere along
the line someone in a position to do so will get your DH to realise that he
does need help.

Amy
Kitty - 22 Jun 2006 22:16 GMT
> exists -- towards children, or towards the vulnerable.  But can it
> really exist between a grown man and a grown woman, a woman who is not
> mentally retarded, physically dependant on him, or in any other way
> incapacitated?  I'm not sure.

http://www.myndtalk.org/htm/abuse.htm
Barbara Didrichsen - 22 Jun 2006 10:51 GMT
[snip]

>> Has he ever shown any remorse for these tantrums?  Has he
>> ever provided his own explanation for why they occur?  Has he
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>THINGS!  Even if he acknowledges that he probably shouldn't have done
>it, it's followed immediately by a BUT.

Wow - deja vu.  This was a hallmark of my marriage -- it was always
something external that was to blame for anything and everything that
went wrong -- and he never forgot a single thing.  He would pick
fights about things that happened 10 years ago as readily as 5 minutes
ago.  

I feel sometimes a peculiar sense of exhaustion when I read your
postings, Zorra -- an echo of my past.  So I know I'm projecting big
time.  

I just feel so much empathy for you and what you're going through.
It's incredibly hard, and people get  distressed that you can't "see
the light" and take a different course of action -- they did with me,
anyway.

Me -- I see you moving to a place where you are taking care of you -
posting here is one of those ways -- and I know, in time, you will
know in your heart what you need to do.  You are a strong woman, and
whatever happens, that will sustain you.

Barb
Bill in Co. - 22 Jun 2006 19:41 GMT
> [snip]
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> the light" and take a different course of action -- they did with me,
> anyway.

Yes.   It's very depressing when you empathize with what Zorra must be going
thru, and (I feel) the rationalizations.    But it gives me some "insight"
(is that the right word?) into this, but damn, it's depressing.    (I don't
mean to talk about you in the third person so much here, Zorra - sorry)

> Me -- I see you moving to a place where you are taking care of you -
> posting here is one of those ways -- and I know, in time, you will
> know in your heart what you need to do.  You are a strong woman, and
> whatever happens, that will sustain you.
>
> Barb

I wish I had your sense of optimism (about many things), sometimes, Barb.
(Hmmm, but then again, if I did, I probably wouldn't recognize myself).
Zorra - 24 Jun 2006 00:41 GMT
> I feel sometimes a peculiar sense of exhaustion when I read your
> postings, Zorra -- an echo of my past.  So I know I'm projecting big
> time.

I really appreciate your support -- particularly of how slow I'm
moving.  It's nice to have someone here who can help explain my
actions when I'm not sure myself of why I do them.

Zorra
Stephanie Stowe - 24 Jun 2006 01:31 GMT
> > I feel sometimes a peculiar sense of exhaustion when I read your
> > postings, Zorra -- an echo of my past.  So I know I'm projecting big
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Zorra

Each in their own time. There will come a day when you feel strenght in
yourself that many of us see in you. What you are dealing with is not a
small matter. And it seems to me that you are making moves to figure out
what is best for you and your children. I get frustrated not because I think
you are being horribly ... anything. I get frustrated because I hate seeing
good people in bad situations, experiencing pain. In my hubris I think Why
Can't I be of SOME help?
Barbara Didrichsen - 24 Jun 2006 15:41 GMT
>> I feel sometimes a peculiar sense of exhaustion when I read your
>> postings, Zorra -- an echo of my past.  So I know I'm projecting big
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>moving.  It's nice to have someone here who can help explain my
>actions when I'm not sure myself of why I do them.

All I have to do is look back from where I came to know there's hope
for you.  You will figure this out, Zorra.  I see you doing that here,
even if it doesn't seem like anything's changing in 3D.  Comparing it
to tackling the preparation and painting of a room in this old house
of mine, 90% of the time and work is in the preparation of the walls.
The painting happens in a snap, once the walls are ready.  

That's kind of like what figuring out my own situation felt like.
There was a lot of work happening behind the scenes, under the
surface, leading me to make a decision that appeared to happen
instantly when it finally came.

If you ever feel like conversing off-board, feel free to drop me an
email -- the addy is valid minus the obvious spam filter.

Barb
A. - 22 Jun 2006 16:05 GMT
> > Zorra, having lived with various persons who THREW THINGS, I need
> > to comment.  You're right.  Merely throwing something in a fit of
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> DD in particular.  So now I find myself jumping in to take the blame
> if I can to protect them (her).

And that's where I think the issue becomes abuse-like.  (Don't
use that word if you don't want to - you're right that only the
person in the situation can ultimately decide whether it's abuse -
but, remember, later on, your kids will get to decide about it, too).

> > Naturally, the more he does this and you mollify him, the more
> > he sees you as Mommy, not Wife.  Just as he probably wanted
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> heard him speak of a rebellious stage which is often indicative of a
> push for independence.

Right - so he never individuated, which would mean he had
Good Mommy/Bad Mommy straightened out in his head (and
knew that real women aren't either one of them).  So, you're
Bad Mommy.  And this is a guy who doesn't think he ever
had a Bad Mommy.  If we take him at his word (and I know a
guy just like that, actually) - he was spoiled rotten.  You'll
never be able to measure up to his Mommy.  Have you talked
to her about his childhood?  Does she say he was perfect
and never threw tantrums?

> > Has he ever shown any remorse for these tantrums?  Has he
> > ever provided his own explanation for why they occur?  Has he
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> THINGS!  Even if he acknowledges that he probably shouldn't have done
> it, it's followed immediately by a BUT.

Sigh.  So, he was perfect as a child, his mom was perfect, and
the only three Aliens he's met are his wife and two children.

How about his dad?  Did his dad ever go after people's property?
As long as it remains unimportant property (the horse example
is probably the most troubling, as a toy that looks like a living
thing is different than a vacuum, I think - and it belonged to a
child; the mouse was more impersonal too).

Does he express affection toward the kids at other times?  Is he
proud of their accomplishments?  Does he remember to help
with their homework?   Having the kids home for summer is indeed
stressful - I wouldn't worry too much about them "bickering" at
the summer camp with others, the camp should be able to handle
that.  Are they going to do more camp after the ones they are in?

At some point, you might be able to at least have a conversation
with him about that, admit that you realize your parenting doesn't
"live up" to his standards (he thinks you're too lax with the kids).
Don't promise to change, of course.  Just acknowledge his remarkably
high standards, and that those standards make it hard for him to
be around (his own) small children.  Don't ask for suggestions (he's
likely to give them anyway).  He may feel something of a stranger
in his own home at this point.

I'd certainly talk to your MIL (if she's at all the kind you can talk
to) about how they disciplined him as a kid and what kinds of
things they had to discipline him for.   How does he do with
regular things, like potty training and getting the kids to pick up
the house?

A.

> Zorra
Zorra - 23 Jun 2006 05:24 GMT
>> Now you're losing me.  :-)  He adores his mom.  Reveres her and
>> keeps
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> to her about his childhood?  Does she say he was perfect
> and never threw tantrums?

I've talked some about his mom before.  This woman has no self, and
lives only to please those around her.  I don't believe he had to lift
a finger inside the house ever.  If you go to her house, it's like you
have those house elves from Harry Potter following you around.  No, I
could never live up to her standards.

> Sigh.  So, he was perfect as a child, his mom was perfect, and
> the only three Aliens he's met are his wife and two children.

Exactly.  Except that it's only one of his children.  The other is a
mini-him.

> How about his dad?  Did his dad ever go after people's property?

Not that I know of, but his dad never had reason to be angry.   He
says his parents have never had a fight in 46 years of marriage.

> As long as it remains unimportant property (the horse example
> is probably the most troubling, as a toy that looks like a living
> thing is different than a vacuum, I think - and it belonged to a
> child; the mouse was more impersonal too).

The horse kind of made me ill.  It wasn't even ripped just on the
seems, the material itself was ripped through.  I just figured I was
anthropomorphizing and over-sensitive about it though.

> Does he express affection toward the kids at other times?

Yes, he does, especially with our son.  He tucks him and reads with
him every night.  He'll take him fishing, or help him build.  Less
often with DD because their personalities clash so badly.  But he did
go on her school field trip, and every now and then he'll stay up
talking to her after DS has gone to bed.

> Is he proud of their accomplishments?

Some.

> Does he remember to help with their homework?

That's my job.

> Having the kids home for summer is indeed
> stressful - I wouldn't worry too much about them "bickering" at
> the summer camp with others, the camp should be able to handle
> that.  Are they going to do more camp after the ones they are in?

This is scout camp and it's unusual.  First, it's run entirely by
parent volunteers, so no one is really an expert at dealing with kids.
Second, it's for cub scouts.  So the cub scouts get to have all the
fun, and the siblings are just sort of stuck at the playground.  They
do try to provide activities for them, but there's only so much
beading you can do.  Last year I considered sending DD to another camp
instead, but she wanted to go to cub scout camp because a friend was
going.  She had so much fun last year that I didn't consider anything
else this year.  And then she was bored out of her skull from the
first day.

They will be going half-days to a program through the school for the
month of July so that I can work.  I'm less worried about that because
it *is* run by professionals that are being paid and should be able to
deal with the normal range of kids' problems.

> At some point, you might be able to at least have a conversation
> with him about that, admit that you realize your parenting doesn't
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> likely to give them anyway).  He may feel something of a stranger
> in his own home at this point.

You really cannot talk to this man.  He only responds with "Hmphs" and
"uh, huhs."  With the occasional "mmMMmm" thrown in if you ask him a
question.

> I'd certainly talk to your MIL (if she's at all the kind you can
> talk
> to) about how they disciplined him as a kid and what kinds of
> things they had to discipline him for.   How does he do with
> regular things, like potty training and getting the kids to pick up
> the house?

I potty-trained them.  DS will generally do what you tell him to.  DD
will generally sass and complain and try to get out of it.  So he does
fine with DS, but not so great with DD.

Zorra
dejablues - 24 Jun 2006 04:24 GMT
> Now you're losing me.  :-)  He adores his mom.  Reveres her and keeps
> her on a pedestal.  He lived at home until he graduated from college.
> He doesn't think he even had any childhood problems, and I've never
> heard him speak of a rebellious stage which is often indicative of a
> push for independence.

That's kind of odd, and not a good thing IMO. He doesn't see his mom as a
real person, with warts and flaws. Now he's got  you, who he's probably
comparing to this All-Perfect-Mother, and you're coming up way short. If
she's on the pedestal, of course you have to fall somewhere below that.

Did he have any girlfriends or serious relationships before you? He probably
has very unrealistic expectations of what a wife/mother/woman ought to be.

Maybe his rebellious stage was delayed twenty years, and you're feeling the
brunt of it, like his mom would have if he'd gone through it at the
appropriate time. Not sure if any of this is accurate for you, but my
16-yr-old son (the "easy" one of my three boys) is giving me trouble today
and I see some rebellion coming on - mostly focused on me.
Zorra - 24 Jun 2006 05:14 GMT
>> Now you're losing me.  :-)  He adores his mom.  Reveres her and
>> keeps
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> she's on the pedestal, of course you have to fall somewhere below
> that.

Yep.

> Did he have any girlfriends or serious relationships before you? He
> probably
> has very unrealistic expectations of what a wife/mother/woman ought
> to be.

There are two other women.  He seems to have them on a pedestal too.
One of them actually started dating him behind her boyfriend's back.
She broke it off with the boyfriend and dated DH for a year or so
before breaking it off with DH and going back to that other boyfriend,
who she married and divorced.  Last I heard, she'd married again.  No
word in 10 or 15 years.  DH strongly suspects that his roommate and
best friend may have been going on noogie runs with this woman for
several years (during or between marriages, I'm not sure).  You'd
think he'd feel lucky to have escaped her, but she's "the one who got
away."

The other he never actually dated.  They were friends for a long time,
and mutually attracted, but the timing was never right.  She actually
called him up the night before our wedding to tell him she'd broken up
with her long-term boyfriend.  I'm sure it was a last minute ploy, but
at that time at least, he chose me over her.  Anyway, at least this
one was a nice woman.

> Maybe his rebellious stage was delayed twenty years, and you're
> feeling the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> today
> and I see some rebellion coming on - mostly focused on me.

lol -- Well, if that's the case, this adolescence has been going on
for almost 6 years.  So it should be over soon, right?

Zorra
cailleach@hotmail.co.uk - 19 Jun 2006 13:00 GMT
> DH, however, started cussing, and then
> actually swung the mouse around by it's cord and smashed it into the
> desk and the floor and who knows what.
...
> he went ballistic.  This time
> he threw the vacuum, and it ended up hitting me and the dog.

Oh Zorra, I'm *so* sorry to hear that.

> I could pack up the kids and go live
> with my in-laws for a couple of months.  It might be what he needs to
> calm down, get a grip, do some thinking, etc.

That could be a very good idea! Even of it was only for a couple of
weeks. Or could he go alone to stay with them, if that would be easier
for you?

> DH's flashes of anger are getting more frequent.

Looking at it from my usual perspective :-(, I wonder if something has
changed, or is something about to change, in your everyday lives? IME
change is usually a source of stress leading to outbursts. Even if it's
a nice change, like going away on vacation. You're in the US, so your
school term will recently have ended, and the kids will be home more?
That *might* be it.

But whatever the source of stress, IMO this is meltdown behaviour, and
it's *not* good. Cussing and banging a mouse around, even breaking it,
I wouldn't worry about those *quite* so much - it's just noise and
objects - but throwing things ** without regard for your safety (or the
dog's) ** IMO that is *bad*. Remember your core values: how important
is your own physical safety to you?

You might need to have some version of "time out" in your life. You
can't put your husband in time out :-), but maybe you can leave for a
day, and take the dog and the children away with you, each time
something like this happens. Or this may be exactly what he wants as
well as needs - time alone to calm down - in which case *he* might be
able to go to a motel for a couple of days after - or preferably
instead of - such an outburst. If he can be that self-aware and aware
of how much danger he is putting you all in, of course.

But in any case, as the others are saying, do stay safe and take care
of yourself! When you see the signs that he's really getting going,
instead of offering to help, walk away. Go into another room (and take
the children and the dog with you if need be!). There often comes a
certain point in the build-up to a meltdown when offers of help -
indeed anything you say to him! - may only add to your husband's
overload.

All the best,

Cailleach

> DH's flashes of anger are getting more frequent.  Two days ago he
> noticed that the mouse on the kids' computer was "broken."  It's true
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Zorra
cailleach@hotmail.co.uk - 19 Jun 2006 21:09 GMT
Having thought about this some more....

I really feel worried because this sounds as if your husband's
behaviour is getting seriously worse. You've never talked about such
*physical* aggression before.  A few months ago he was throwing
envelopes and dirty looks your way, but now he has thrown a vacuum
cleaner.

It really seems as if he has less and less self-control and his
behaviour at home is becoming more and more dangerous. I don't know why
his aggression is getting so much worse, but surely it *is* getting
worse? So I take back what I said about change being the trigger for
his problems. Whatever may be the immediate trigger, *something* is
building up under this.

You may not be in immediate danger but he seems to be going downhill.
The change is gradual and at times things seem to get better for a
while, but the general trend seems to be downwards.

Or is this really just more of the same? Has he ever in rage thrown a
solid object in your direction before?

Yours anxiously,

Cailleach

> > DH, however, started cussing, and then
> > actually swung the mouse around by it's cord and smashed it into the
[quoted text clipped - 77 lines]
> >
> > Zorra
whisper - 21 Jun 2006 00:45 GMT
If Zorras behavior has changed ( for the better, standing up to him more
etc) his behavior/reaction is bound to escalate, because he is no longer in
"control" of the situation

I agree Zorra, take the kids to visit the in-laws ( maybe even tell him for
a few days) and then just stay until you feel you are ready to come home (
if you ever are)

I saw my X behavior escalate, when I stopped worrying about what he wanted
or needed and started worrying about ME.. He actually pinned me against a
wall towards the end of our marriage and told me how he had been
fantasizing about hitting me all day ( he had been drinking all day too)

I had an appointment with a lawyer a couple of weeks later and I told my
family what happened so they were made aware. .in case he really did do
something to me.

Kass
: Having thought about this some more....
:
[quoted text clipped - 103 lines]
: > >
: > > Zorra
Zorra - 21 Jun 2006 02:36 GMT
> If Zorras behavior has changed ( for the better, standing up to him
> more
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> do
> something to me.

But see, these are the stories that get me.  DH doesn't drink.  He
doesn't regret.  All the stories I've ever heard of abusive husbands
don't fit him.  His *anger* has certainly been escalating.  And his
*frustration* as well.  But the vacuum incident notwithstanding, he's
never actually raised a hand to me, or held me, or pinned me, or
anything like that.  And while he can act somewhat violently in a
moment of anger and frustration, I don't think he's capable of
planning to hurt someone.  With all these incidents, including the
vacuum, it's an inanimate object he's raged against.  So while their
is definitely escalation, I don't really see it as an escalation
towards abuse.

Zorra
Zorra - 21 Jun 2006 03:16 GMT
> So while their is definitely escalation

Dang it!  I hate it when I come across as illiterate!

Zorra
Nina - 21 Jun 2006 03:17 GMT
>But see, these are the stories that get me.  DH doesn't drink.  He
>doesn't regret.  All the stories I've ever heard of abusive husbands
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>is definitely escalation, I don't really see it as an escalation
>towards abuse.

Ok... but if you really completely think this, then why did you say,
"But damn, I'm beginning to think it's just a matter of time before I
have no choice."  If you are truly not worried about an abusive or
dangerous situation, what are you saying?
Zorra - 21 Jun 2006 03:39 GMT
>>But see, these are the stories that get me.  DH doesn't drink.  He
>>doesn't regret.  All the stories I've ever heard of abusive husbands
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> have no choice."  If you are truly not worried about an abusive or
> dangerous situation, what are you saying?

Well, I flip-flop.  He does something angry and uncharacteristic, and
I do get to wondering where it's heading.  Then he acts so normal, and
I think maybe I overreacted.  And then, like I said above, the way he
acts doesn't really jibe with what I've heard described as associated
with abusive behavior.

Of course now half of the people will be thinking that I'm making
excuses for him, and the other half will be thinking that I'm
over-dramatizing things.  I'm just not sure where the truth lies.

Zorra
La Mer - 21 Jun 2006 04:44 GMT
> >>But see, these are the stories that get me.  DH doesn't drink.  He
> >>doesn't regret.  All the stories I've ever heard of abusive husbands
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Zorra

I think that if you weren't worried; you wouldn't be posting.  I know
that you need an outlet, but I think that this is more than _just_ an
outlet.  He might not fit the "profile" of an abuser, but then again,
there really is no such thing as a typical abuser.  They come in all
shapes and sizes.  Your husband sound less typical than many...but he
certainly does not fit the profile of a healthy, wel adjusted
man/person.  From your description, he seems/sounds very troubled and
in need of help.  My major concerns from all that you share is the
impact on your children, who for whatever reason, are already troubled.
You have this group as an outlet, but your children don't know that
there is actually anything wrong with their dad.  Not only don't they
know that their dad is not terribly healthy, but if they did know,
they're not mature enough to have outlets in which to vent their
displeasure.  They're victims at this point.

No one in this group can tell you what to do Zorra and you clearly are
not ready to leave.  But for the sake of your children, I have had  and
continue to have concerns about the safety of your children;
physically, mentally and emotionally.   I feel for you and wish that I
could say something that might help.
Tai - 21 Jun 2006 05:03 GMT
>>>> But see, these are the stories that get me.  DH doesn't drink.  He
>>>> doesn't regret.  All the stories I've ever heard of abusive
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> physically, mentally and emotionally.   I feel for you and wish that I
> could say something that might help.

I know how you feel and don't think I have anything useful to say to Zorra.

I actually regard the background level of his put downs, lack of respect and
unkindness as more serious than the occasional temper tantrums that involve
throwing things. I'm not trying to excuse those, of course, especially if
the vacuum cleaner was aimed at people instead of flung at random. It is the
former that would lead me to issue an ultimatum of "change or I'm gone",
though.

That Zorra can't trust her husband to deal with their daughter's problems
appropriately is a huge worry and I feel very sorry for her and their
children.

Tai

Tai
dejablues - 21 Jun 2006 19:04 GMT
> Well, I flip-flop.  He does something angry and uncharacteristic, and I do
> get to wondering where it's heading.  Then he acts so normal, and I think
> maybe I overreacted.  And then, like I said above, the way he acts doesn't
> really jibe with what I've heard described as associated with abusive
> behavior.

You say he doesn't drink. Could he be abusing prescription drugs?
Zorra - 21 Jun 2006 20:30 GMT
>> Well, I flip-flop.  He does something angry and uncharacteristic,
>> and I do get to wondering where it's heading.  Then he acts so
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> You say he doesn't drink. Could he be abusing prescription drugs?

He does drink, just not excessively.  He might have 2 beers on a
typical day, there are many days when he has none, and it's rare for
him to have 3.

No drugs of any kind.  The last time he was prescribed pain pills was
several years ago, and he never actually used those up.  Neither of us
is currently on any kind of a prescription at all.  I think cailleach
has it nailed.  I think he's buckling under the stress.

Zorra
cailleach@hotmail.co.uk - 21 Jun 2006 18:24 GMT
>And while he can act somewhat violently in a
>moment of anger and frustration, I don't think he's capable of
>planning to hurt someone.  With all these incidents, including the
>vacuum, it's an inanimate object he's raged against.  So while there
>is definitely escalation, I don't really see it as an escalation
>towards abuse.

You know Zorra, I don't know what anyone else thinks of this, and I
can't pin it down to any single specific thing in my own experience,
but what you are saying about your DH is putting the words "nervous
breakdown" into my head. Your husband could be working up towards a
really dangerous mental crisis.

Your husband is piling up stress upon stress. In the terms that A.
used, I think it's some mixture of #1 and #2 - for whatever reason he
is getting increasingly stressed and angry in general (#1), and so now
whenever he encounters one of his huge collection of minor triggers
(#2) he explodes. I do not think that his rage is necessarily caused by
you or specifically directed at you -- but that doesn't matter. In fits
and starts he is cracking up and instead of being your protector (and
the children's) there are now times when he is putting you all at risk.
Going away for a while may delay things, and it may be the safest
thing for you to do, but it's not going to stop the overall process.

I have two mental images of your husband. One is of a house of cards,
always precariously balanced, in which some of the supporting cards (we
don't know which!) have somehow shifted and the whole lot is wobbling
and about to come tumbling down. You cannot hold up that house of
cards. My other image of him is of a volcano, previously dormant,
gradually starting to sizzle more and more, first sending up little
clouds of smoke and distant rumbles, going quiet again for a while,
then starting up again a little bit more. The *first* small bubble of
fire and lava has now hit you. There may well be more. The volcano may
*not* be specifically aiming at you or the kids but Zorra, you don't
want to be in the way - or your children to be in the way - when he
blows up.

And I am torn in two directions about what you might do. Part of me
says, give your husband a clear choice: either he takes a trip to the
doctor or else you take the children away for an indefinite period to
protect yourself and them from his loss of control and his mounting
aggression. That is what I would do if *my* husband starting doing what
your husband has been doing and there was no other obvious explanation
for his rage attacks (such as me being unfaithful!). But another part
of me says, what about your daughter? Is your husband's growing crisis
going to stop your daughter from seeing this psychologist you have
found, from getting the help *she* needs?

It is even possible that one of his biggest new sources of stress is
not you but your daughter. We've talked about how *hard* it is for your
husband to be a positive parent to her. And yet this is what is being
demanded from him, of necessity, and he has tried to do that. He is on
a knife edge with her, operating way outside his natural abilities. And
he must be feeling very anxious about her too.  So it strikes me as
urgent for *all* your sakes that you and he and she *do* get to see
this child therapist/psychologist, regardless of financial cost.

And meanwhile, can you get the kids out of his way, and maybe yourself
too? Could your son go to summer camp?  Could you and your daughter go
to relatives for a time and come back for her psych appointment?

I hope you can find some good way through this, my thoughts are very
much with you,

Cailleach

> > If Zorras behavior has changed ( for the better, standing up to him
> > more
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> Zorra
Zorra - 21 Jun 2006 21:38 GMT
> I have two mental images of your husband. One is of a house of
> cards,
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> want to be in the way - or your children to be in the way - when he
> blows up.

I do have to say that these sound like accurate descriptions.

> And I am torn in two directions about what you might do. Part of me
> says, give your husband a clear choice: either he takes a trip to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> going to stop your daughter from seeing this psychologist you have
> found, from getting the help *she* needs?

As I told Stephanie, I'm really hoping that getting her the help she
needs is going to end up getting him the help he needs as well.

> It is even possible that one of his biggest new sources of stress is
> not you but your daughter. We've talked about how *hard* it is for
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> urgent for *all* your sakes that you and he and she *do* get to see
> this child therapist/psychologist, regardless of financial cost.

Yes, I agree.  The two of them have always butt heads, but it does
seem like lately his anger is placed more and more often in her
direction.  And I recognize some of my depressive tendancies in him.
For example, the tendancy to lump every little thing that happens
together, "Oh, God!  Not *again*!"  The feeling that the universe is
out to get you "why me?" and blowing small things up into big ones.

> And meanwhile, can you get the kids out of his way, and maybe
> yourself
> too? Could your son go to summer camp?  Could you and your daughter
> go
> to relatives for a time and come back for her psych appointment?

You asked before if things had changed.  I think they have.  For one
thing, I really don't think he's happy with this last promotion.  I
don't know that he enjoys work anymore.  Instead of getting to do
anything fun, it's all meeting after meeting after meeting.  And then
there is my daughter starting to hit puberty, and the corresponding
plummeting behavior.  And finally there is my own journey out of
depression.  You'd think the last would be a good thing, but it may
not be for him.  At any rate, his world is probably very different,
and much worse than it was a year ago.

> I hope you can find some good way through this, my thoughts are very
> much with you,

Thanks,

Zorra
cailleach@hotmail.co.uk - 22 Jun 2006 10:47 GMT
>As I told Stephanie, I'm really hoping that getting her the help she
>needs is going to end up getting him the help he needs as well.

Well, that sounds like a reasonable plan. It's not guaranteed that your
husband will get *all* the help he needs from doing this because the
focus will be on your daughter; but at the very least your husband
should get valuable help on how to interact with her. And if these
psychs are on the ball then you are right, it could be a *very* big
step in the right direction for him too.

So that sounds like a top priority for the time being: keeping things
stable enough so that you can all get to see this psych.

Two things to bear in mind. First the house of cards; you might hold it
up for a while but you can't hold it up forever. We'll hope it stays up
for *long* enough to get help. So, do whatever it takes. Even re-read
"The Explosive Child" with your husband in mind! Second, the volcano;
you and the children are living on the slopes. Volcanoes are
unpredictable things, so keep a weather eye out for new developments.

And if things don't work out the way you hope, or if he does degenerate
too quickly for that, well, you'll deal with it as it happens. One
thing at a time, eh?

>You asked before if things had changed.  I think they have.  For one
>thing, I really don't think he's happy with this last promotion.  I
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>not be for him.  At any rate, his world is probably very different,
>and much worse than it was a year ago.

Yes these are all changes,  but surely none of these things would be
enough to tip a normally functioning person into incoherent rage
attacks. That's why I made the point about me being unfaithful as a
"reasonable" cause for violent rages - these causes are just not on the
same scale. So either he is cracking up anyway, or he has deep-seated,
long-term problems which mean he can't cope even with lesser in his
life. Or both. (Now if he was an Aspie then his worsening rage attacks
could be pretty "normal" responses to the level of changes and stresses
that you've describedstresses , but being an Aspie isn't normal either
:-))

And keep in mind that the particular *form* of breakdown he's having -
worsening rage attacks - is very dangerous to the people around him.
Much more dangerous than, say, weeping attacks or hiding in a corner
and refusing to get out of bed.

So I do think he is in serious and deepening trouble, he and the kids
are stressing each other out, and it would be safer all round (for the
time being at least) to separate him from the kids as much as possible.

And FWIW, I'm not sure that supervising a scout camp is a good activity
for your husband in his time off. Can you get him out of there and send
him off fishing or golf playing or whatever calms him down? I realise
the answer may be "no", but if possible IMO it would help. This is a
family crisis. He's not a danger to the children at the camp but right
now he doesn't need the added stress and you and your children don't
need the results of his stress!

I think you are a *very* brave woman. There are no perfect solutions
and whatever you do now is the right thing to do. Just keep getting
yourself through the days.

Cailleach

> > I have two mental images of your husband. One is of a house of
> > cards,
[quoted text clipped - 78 lines]
>
> Zorra
Zorra - 23 Jun 2006 01:27 GMT
> And FWIW, I'm not sure that supervising a scout camp is a good
> activity
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> now he doesn't need the added stress and you and your children don't
> need the results of his stress!

Well, it was only two days, and it's over now.  I did all four days
last year, but it was just too physically exhausting for me, so I'd
asked him to take two of them this year.  He seemed to do okay.

Zorra
cailleach@hotmail.co.uk - 23 Jun 2006 13:22 GMT
> Well, it was only two days, and it's over now.  ...  He seemed to do okay.

Well that's good! I'm glad he did OK at it (for his sake), and I'm glad
he doesn't need to do any more of it (but for *your* sake, not his!
:-))

Going also by what you said about the sanwich incident to Tai,
supervising scout camp really is unusually demanding on him.  It
requires a big extra cognitive and social effort.  Just as you are not
an extension of him, so he is not an extension of you. He does not have
all of your abilities and he cannot fulfill all of your expectations.

And the real bummer is, he can't/wont tell you any of that.  Instead he
is angry and rude and he furiously demands that you make sandwiches and
he loses it totally over a broken vacuum cleaner.

You really do have two Inflexible-Explosives on your hands. But only
one of them is a child.

Cailleach

> > And FWIW, I'm not sure that supervising a scout camp is a good
> > activity
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Zorra
A. - 21 Jun 2006 18:48 GMT
> > If Zorras behavior has changed ( for the better, standing up to him
> > more
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> is definitely escalation, I don't really see it as an escalation
> towards abuse.

Zorra, I really think you're fundamentally missing the meaning of the
word
"abuse."   It's _already_ abuse, because it frightened you and
the children and reconstructed your moods and your behavior.
You're on eggshells around this guy.  It has NOTHING to do with
whether he PLANS it.  He will never PLAN it - but he could hurt
you anyway.  That's why it is so hard.  If he ever does hurt you
or one of the kids with one of his tantrums, he'll likely feel very
bad and even apologize.  But the kids have to be afraid of him,
and your boy, especially, must feel really powerless.  THe three
of you (the others in the family) are the ones doing all the THINKING
and PLANNING (what do we do if he does this again?)  Believe
me, the kids think about it in some vague or some specific way,
because they love you and it has to scare them that "Mommy can't
make Daddy behave," or however they think about it.  "Daddy
makes us all behave, but no one makes Daddy behave."

At the very least, in a family, if one member is prone to tantrums,
they have to have consequences - just like everyone else.
I can almost prove to you that you are already in an abusive
situation, by asking some questions.  What if the consequences
of your husband breaking something that was used by someone
else, is that something of his got broken?  Or taken away for
a period of time?  What if you agreed that each time he did
something like this, he had to go to bed without television.  Or
something.

First - he'd never agree.  You're powerless over all his bad
behaviors - and that's not right.  He won't go to counseling,
he won't behave, you can't literally grab things away from him -
because you fear being hurt even more, don't you?

You'd never even TRY to work out a system of "punishments"
for his behaviors, because you fear it would make it worse.

All you can think of, actually, is leaving - which he probably
won't mind that much at all.

His lack of emotional investment in you and the kids, his
willingness to continue these behaviors without finding assistance
or enlisting you as an aid in dealing with them, etc., etc.  -
all say "abusive situation" to me.  It has nothing to do with
what gets thrown or how much bigger it is each time.

I think you already know, Zorra, that his behavior is likely
to get worse - even if no act is intentional.  It's not the mind
of the "abuser" that makes it abuse, it's the response of the
other people involved.  You're obviously wondering if your
daughter's reaction to camp is related to what's going on
at home - which would be a sign of abuse.  If you're thinking
abuse this much, just face up to it - you're afraid of your
husband, his moods, his behaviors, his statements, the model
he sets for the children, etc. etc.

You need to at least find a support group for abused women
(you don't have to go if you really don't want to - but have
their location and number available, are you telling any real
life people about all this?  I hope so).  You should investigate
your county resources for restraining orders - where I live
the vacuum throwing incident would be enough, but we're
very conservative here.  Most counties have help for women
in the legal department, at least make yourself feel stronger
by knowing where to go (I'd go up to the courthouse and pick
up the pamphlets or whatever they have) and thinking clearly
about your OWN intentions.

Meanwhile, I have to ask you:  What does he have to actually
_do_, in your mind, before he finally becomes an abuser?

If you are reserving that word for when the man appears to
be conscious in advance of what he's going to do, you are
definitely never going to see it.  

A.

> Zorra
Bill in Co. - 21 Jun 2006 22:01 GMT
>>> If Zorras behavior has changed ( for the better, standing up to him
>>> more etc) his behavior/reaction is bound to escalate, because he is no
>>> longer in "control" of the situation
>>>
>>> I agree Zorra, take the kids to visit the in-laws ( maybe even tell him
for
>>> a few days) and then just stay until you feel you are ready to come home
(
>>> if you ever are)
>>>
>>> I saw my X behavior escalate, when I stopped worrying about what he
>>> wanted or needed and started worrying about ME.. He actually pinned me
>>> against a wall towards the end of our marriage and told me how he had
been
>>> fantasizing about hitting me all day ( he had been drinking all day too)
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> word "abuse."   It's _already_ abuse, because it frightened you and
> the children and reconstructed your moods and your behavior.

Exactly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You know, I think now, for just about the first time, I'm beginning to
"understand" (if you can call it that?) how this cycle can continue.   And
it depresses the hell out of me.    :-(

> You're on eggshells around this guy.  It has NOTHING to do with
> whether he PLANS it.  He will never PLAN it - but he could hurt
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
>>
>> Zorra
AllYou! - 19 Jun 2006 13:51 GMT
> Well, I won't actually do it.  I never do, do I?  But damn, I'm
> beginning to think it's just a matter of time before I have no
> choice.

What a shame that you seem to have skipped an all important step.
A. - 19 Jun 2006 20:39 GMT
> DH's flashes of anger are getting more frequent.

Okay, I'm going to wade in here and point out that your DH's
situation seems to be ONE of the following:

1)  He is angry most/all of the time and attempts to control it,
when he fails - you see "flashes of anger"  (I'd call it "acting out")

2)  He is not angry all of the time, but instead of experiencing
normal frustration, he overreacts to minor events.

I think it's #1.

Two days ago he
> noticed that the mouse on the kids' computer was "broken."  It's true
> that something had happened to the right button, but the left button
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> desk and the floor and who knows what.  After that, the left button
> was missing altogether, and the mouse was unusable.

It sounds like he's looking for things to get angry about - and
within the category "kid's stuff."  I really don't like that.  My ex-
escalated this "anger over kid's stuff" once he found he could
really get to me.  There's something to be very concerned about,
if your angry husband's focus now includes the kids and their things,
as well.

> Then today he was trying to vacuum up some hamster bedding that my son
> spilled,

Note that it's the kids again.

and the small vacuum that we keep upstairs wouldn't suck.
> Now, it was running fine, and likely there was just a clog in it, or
> the filter needed cleaning.  But again, he went ballistic.  This time
> he threw the vacuum, and it ended up hitting me and the dog.
>
> I'm....not exactly scared, but definitely disturbed.

What did you do right after he threw the vacuum?  How did
the hamster bedding eventually get cleaned up?

It occurred to
> me that with this being the summer, we have the opportunity to just
> get out of Dodge for a while.  I could pack up the kids and go live
> with my in-laws for a couple of months.  It might be what he needs to
> calm down, get a grip, do some thinking, etc.

Or, he may view it as winning exactly what he wants.  You
and the kids out of his life, a real vacation.  So, if you can
tolerate the idea that you're rewarding him for his behavior
as well as attempting to "calm him down," then this would be
a plan.  It won't change him in the least though, in fact, it
may initiate a long pattern of him acting out, you leaving, etc.
I can't see how that's good for the kids - and as Dr. Lilith
pointed out, if one of your kids has ODD, then that child is
going to learn that acting out gets people what they want.

We couldn't stay with
> my folks as they live in a tiny apartment.
>
> Well, I won't actually do it.  I never do, do I?  But damn, I'm
> beginning to think it's just a matter of time before I have no choice.

Actually, you _could_ in fact demand that he leave, instead.
You seem to be pretty committed to being the one who ends
up  "victimized" enough to change the situation, though.  I did
the same thing.

Here's a mitigating thought:  If you DID go to his parents' house
for a time, what will they be thinking and saying about/to him?
You'll tell them WHY, right?  Because, if that extra added
embarassment is in there, then your DH won't view his situation
as a total "win."  On the other hand, since it is his parents
that you will be "using" to accomplish your goal of reconstructing
your relationship, that may make him feel abandoned, and even
angrier.  In most marriages that are falling apart (and yours is -
as you are THINKING about separation), each partner wants
their own parents as allies.  Issues such as who has the smaller
apartment, etc., do not enter into the psychological domains of
relationships - which is where your husband's problems are.

At any rate, I can tell you this:  if your husband's goal is to
"get a break" from you and the kids, his behaviors will escalate
until he gets what he wants, one way or another.  If, on the other
hand, he's a chronically angry person who acts out with you and
the kids because he _can_, you may see no real pattern to
his outbursts, and there's really not much to be gained by leaving
and coming back, except that _you_ get a vacation - from him.

If you can frame it as, "I need a vacation from you, so do the kids,
we're going, we'll be back when we're suitably rested..." instead
of in the middle of an angry outburst, that might be your best
chance for seeing if a little separation can cause him to "think"
or "calm down."

What happens if you bring this topic up ("We need a break from
each other"?)  What does he say?  What do you think he'll
say?

A.

> Zorra
Bill in Co. - 19 Jun 2006 22:33 GMT
>> DH's flashes of anger are getting more frequent.
>
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>
> Actually, you _could_ in fact demand that he leave, instead.

That might be difficult to pull off though if he's footing the bills (incl
the house).   I mean, come on; realistically, or pragmatically, how can she
really do that?

> You seem to be pretty committed to being the one who ends
> up  "victimized" enough to change the situation, though.  I did
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>>
>> Zorra
A. - 19 Jun 2006 23:09 GMT
> >> DH's flashes of anger are getting more frequent.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
> the house).   I mean, come on; realistically, or pragmatically, how can she
> really do that?

I don't know.  Zorra is the one who put it on the table as
a possibility (by going to his parent's house).  Second,
if the man becomes violently explosive, and the police get
involved - there will be no choice.  In that case, Zorra would
need to find out about local resources until her husband's
wages can be garnished and the finances settled out.  That
is what happens if you don't fix things and your spouse
gets really out of control.

So, realistically or pragmatically, I don't know what Zorra
can or will do - I just know that you can't "pragmatically"
deal with a person who has a potential for violence.  Zorra
knows how to combine pragmatism with other factors, as
she's been doing.

It _is_ very hard, practically, to get out of an abusive
relationship.  But there are ways to do it and Zorra has
proposed a solution (going away for a couple of months).

A.

> > You seem to be pretty committed to being the one who ends
> > up  "victimized" enough to change the situation, though.  I did
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> >>
> >> Zorra
thepixelfreak - 20 Jun 2006 21:06 GMT
<sn>
> and then actually swung the mouse around by it's cord and smashed it
> into the desk and the floor and who knows what.  After that, the left
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> <sn>
> I'm....not exactly scared, but definitely disturbed.

Huh?? You should be scared. This is not normal behavior. Your Husband
is an adult, correct?  What is to say this doesn't progress into
physical confrontations with you? I'd get him into some Anger
management classes, if you can.

Signature

thepixelfreak

Nina - 20 Jun 2006 22:39 GMT
>Well, I won't actually do it.  I never do, do I?  But damn, I'm
>beginning to think it's just a matter of time before I have no choice.

Wouldn't it be better, for both the kids AND you, to do this while you
do have a choice?

When I was a kid, we ran out of the house and to the in-laws one night
when there was too much violence, and believe me, I have never
forgotten it.  That feeling of terror.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.