Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Marriage / Marriage / December 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Wondering if I should stay in relationship

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
kate - 26 Dec 2006 19:39 GMT
hey there,
so, having serious intimacy problems in marriage.  My husband stopped
kissing me years ago.

Would it be selfish of me to leave with a child in the picture?
Nina - 26 Dec 2006 20:14 GMT
>hey there,
>so, having serious intimacy problems in marriage.  My husband stopped
>kissing me years ago.
>
>Would it be selfish of me to leave with a child in the picture?

Well, with very little information, it's hard to say, but... I think
that it's just as bad and often a lot worse to raise children in a
two-parent unhappy household as in a single-parent happy one.  

So I would think that you either need to do something to address the
intimacy issues or seriously consider leaving.
kate - 26 Dec 2006 20:22 GMT
Thanks for the advice, working on being strong and leaving,

> >hey there,
> >so, having serious intimacy problems in marriage.  My husband stopped
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> So I would think that you either need to do something to address the
> intimacy issues or seriously consider leaving.
Larry G. - 26 Dec 2006 21:00 GMT
[Note: By convention, responses to Usenet posts are placed *below*
previous (quoted) posts.  The previous top post has been repositioned
to follow this format.]

>> >hey there,
>> >so, having serious intimacy problems in marriage.  My husband stopped
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> So I would think that you either need to do something to address the
>> intimacy issues or seriously consider leaving.

> Thanks for the advice, working on being strong and leaving,

Wow!  That was quick!  You would throw away your marriage based
on one post and one response in an internet newsgroup.

Please solicit and consider other options before doing anything rash.
(Unless, of course, you came here for the express purpose of finding
someone to validate what you wanted to do in the first place, but
didn't want to take responsibility for following your own impulses.)

Things to consider, ask yourself, or resolve:

1. WHY hasn't your husband kissed you in years?

2. Are there other problems in your marriage that need to be
addressed?

3. Simply running away may not solve the real problems.  If
you got into another relationship with your current problems
unresolved, you would very likely carry these old issues into
your future relationship(s).

4. There is no guarantee that single parenthood will be any
happier than your current misery.  You will simply exchange
one set of problems for another - no constant reminder of
an unaffectionate spouse, but greater stress from being
the head of house with fewer adults, breadwinners and
care-takers.

You original post was way short on useful information.  Are
you hiding from yourself as much as from us?

I suspect that you are in a state of emotional pain and
disappointment which generally leads to denial.  Denial
allows you to cope with the current situation, but it
usually permits it to degenerate into something much worse
which will no longer be denied.  (Coming here is one sign
that is already happening.)

So, before things get much worse - get PROFESSIONAL counseling!

Get it for yourself, first, in secret if you have to.  Do not
stop counseling until your counselor(s) tell you that you are
OK.  Most who start get scared of the changes they want to make,
so they come up with self-diagnoses of "I'm all better, now,
thanks so much, see ya'!" way before the situation has improved
to a sustainable level.

Once you and your therapist have establish a healthy rapport,
he/she will let you know when and how to get your husband
involved, and what you can do to make your life more bearable
in the meantime.  And if your husband is unwilling to cooperate,
your counselor should help you with the transition to single
parenthood.  Various support groups may be sought in addition
to individual counseling.

Hope this helps,
Larry G.
LAMPS
www.loveandmarriageseminars.com

Signature

Your mind is a terrible thing to waste - TURN OFF YOUR TV!

kate - 26 Dec 2006 21:31 GMT
Thank-you for the honest and helpful reply.  Of course I didn't just
make up my mind from a reply on the internet.  This has been something
we've talked about alot.  He doesn't want to be with me either.  My
therapist says we're in a co-dependant relationship.  Alcoholism is
also a factor, I know I must leave, just as mentioned, working on it
and wanting some crazy sort of support.

He doesn't say anything when I have talked about it with him.  Just
wondering if it's just me, or if others are going through this.
> [Note: By convention, responses to Usenet posts are placed *below*
> previous (quoted) posts.  The previous top post has been repositioned
[quoted text clipped - 80 lines]
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Larry G. - 27 Dec 2006 02:25 GMT
> Thank-you for the honest and helpful reply.  Of course I didn't just
> make up my mind from a reply on the internet.  This has been something
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> He doesn't say anything when I have talked about it with him.  Just
> wondering if it's just me, or if others are going through this.

Thank you for supplying a wealth of additional information.  It is
much easier to comprehend the situation.

If he doesn't want to be with you, why are you bothering to ask
if you should leave?

What kind of marriages did your parents and his parents have?
Did his parents split and yours stick together?
The relationships we see as children form our expectations of
what and how we should live as adults.  If you have differing
expectations, or different (incompatible) goals, then you will
have problems and probably need to find someone else.

Be aware, after you leave, you still need to resolve the issues
raised in your previous marriage.  Otherwise they carry over into
the next, and the next, and . . . !

So, your question wasn't really about being selfish and leaving;
is was about finding some excuse to stay, for what ever reason.

If you want to use your children as a reason to do anything,
consider that you are responsible for setting the tone and
nature of their future relationships, through the relationship(s)
you show them now.  If your is dysfunctional, theirs will likely
be as well.

Commitment to a miserable, unsatisfying coexistance is hardly
something most parents would wish upon their kids.
So, the question you should really seek to answer is,
"What kind of relationships do you want your children to
enjoy/suffer?"

Cheers,
Larry G.
LAMPS
www.loveandmarriageseminars.com

Signature

Your mind is a terrible thing to waste - TURN OFF YOUR TV!

tabaround@yahoo.com - 28 Dec 2006 02:15 GMT
Hi there, Kate ...

I am glad you broadened your explanation, because truthfully and even
now, not many of us are qualified to advise you as to how or what your
course of action should be.  What I would tell you is this ...

Love comes around once in a lifetime.  True love isn't often found more
than once, although it does happen.  From the divorced people that I
have both counseled and befriended, they have admitted that even though
they were remarried, they knew now that they should have stayed and
tried to work out the first marriage.  Why?  Because they divorced
their one true love.

Here's the thing ... a lifetime is a long time and you will both be
challenged by changes and perhaps develop habits that are both
destructive to yourselves and your marriage.  The habit is the SYMPTOM
that overlays the problem.  What most of us miss is finding a way to
get to the problem and work at resolving it.  Sometimes we can do it
alone, but more often than not it will require an objective observer
who can evaluate you both together, and then apart, to determine what
is required to confront and resolve the issue(s).  If you think that
his not kissing you is at the root of the problem, again, I remind you
that the behavior is a SYMPTOM of an underlying problem.

I have not met a couple yet that could admit they had a wonderful,
intimate and exciting sex life if they couldn't say the same thing
about their normal daily lives together.  Passion is passion and lust,
lust, both fading, physically driven emotions that often put us
together with the wrong person.  With time, as the lust phase ends
something else has to take it's place and that is most often a
friendship that is built on love, but mostly TRUST.  If a marriage or
significant relationship breaks down, it is because the trust has been
undercut.  You truly need to decide if the relationship is worth
fighting for, if you love him enough to try to find your way back to
one another and have the life you initially wanted and dreamt of
having.  Most certainly, if you are estranged, it has something to do
with the both of you, so neither of you should ever consider the other
'the problem'.

It is my hope you will try to talk over your wants and needs with your
spouse and make an appeal to him to seek the help of a caring
counselor.  If you love each other, fight like hell to save your
relationship with one another.  You can run away from it if you please,
but the problems are packed in your suitcases.

The very best of luck and may God watch over the two of you ...

Tab
> Thank-you for the honest and helpful reply.  Of course I didn't just
> make up my mind from a reply on the internet.  This has been something
[quoted text clipped - 89 lines]
> > http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> > ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Casey - 28 Dec 2006 03:51 GMT
tabaround said
> Hi there, Kate ...
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> tried to work out the first marriage.  Why?  Because they divorced
> their one true love.

You need to befriend some more divorced people to get a better sampling
before you start generalizing.  Many divorced people realize they
should NOT have stayed in a bad marriage and some (myself included)
feel like they tried too long before admitting the inevitable.

True love sometimes strikes after divorce.


Casey
tabaround@yahoo.com - 28 Dec 2006 04:05 GMT
Thanks for the feedback, Casey.  It was not my intent to generalize,
however, most people do enter into marriage under the guise that they
are in love with the person they plan to marry.  If we are talking
about a "bad marriage", again, it never starts out that way and usually
has roots in deeper issues involving one or both of the partners.

I am happy you have no regrets.  As it should be.

Tab

> tabaround said
> > Hi there, Kate ...
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>  
> Casey
Casey - 28 Dec 2006 04:17 GMT
tabaround said
> > tabaround said
> > > Hi there, Kate ...
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> about a "bad marriage", again, it never starts out that way and usually
> has roots in deeper issues involving one or both of the partners.

Again, you are generalizing.  Many marriages start with people being
(or believing they are) in love with each other ... and yet the
marriage eventually disintegrates.  My marriage didn't start out as a
bad one - and I truly felt I was in love with her when we married.

> I am happy you have no regrets.  As it should be.

Yes.

Casey
Doug Anderson - 28 Dec 2006 16:48 GMT
> Hi there, Kate ...
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Love comes around once in a lifetime.

I don't think so.  For some it doesn't ever come around.  For others
it comes around more than once.

> True love isn't often found more
> than once, although it does happen.  From the divorced people that I
> have both counseled and befriended, they have admitted that even though
> they were remarried, they knew now that they should have stayed and
> tried to work out the first marriage.  Why?  Because they divorced
> their one true love.

You would find that most of the divorced and remarried people who are
regulars here would disagree about that.
-Calliope- - 30 Dec 2006 19:02 GMT
> You would find that most of the divorced and remarried people who are
> regulars here would disagree about that.

Completely.

Cal~
Next In Line - 28 Dec 2006 22:46 GMT
> Hi there, Kate ...
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Love comes around once in a lifetime.  True love isn't often found more
> than once, although it does happen.

"True Love" is a fairy tale.  Either a relationship "works" or it doesn't.
kate - 26 Dec 2006 20:45 GMT
> hey there,
> so, having serious intimacy problems in marriage.  My husband stopped
> kissing me years ago.
>
> Would it be selfish of me to leave with a child in the picture?

Is anyone else in relatively new marriage - 6 years, without kissing
even during sex?
Doug Anderson - 26 Dec 2006 21:15 GMT
> > hey there,
> > so, having serious intimacy problems in marriage.  My husband stopped
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Is anyone else in relatively new marriage - 6 years, without kissing
> even during sex?

What does you husband say when you talk about this with him?  Why has
he stopped kissing you?

Do you still want him to?

Do you want to kiss him?  If not, why not?  If so, why don't you do
it?

Have the two of you been to a couples therapist?  If not, why not?

You give very little information, but the kind of problem you are
describing sometimes can be solved.
kate - 26 Dec 2006 21:40 GMT
And no, I actually don't want him to anymore, it's been too long, and
he's pushed away too many times.

> > > hey there,
> > > so, having serious intimacy problems in marriage.  My husband stopped
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> You give very little information, but the kind of problem you are
> describing sometimes can be solved.
Doug Anderson - 26 Dec 2006 21:51 GMT
> And no, I actually don't want him to anymore, it's been too long, and
> he's pushed away too many times.

OK, well now I can answer your original question.

Yes, it would be selfish of you to leave with a child in the picture.
But it sounds like your mind is made up that you aren't interested in
working on the relationship.

And in that case, the best thing is to do the selfish thing, and
leave, IMO.
S.D. - 27 Dec 2006 19:10 GMT
> And no, I actually don't want him to anymore, it's been too long, and
> he's pushed away too many times.

Based on a smattering of posts with little substance, sounds as though
you're looking for folks to say you've been wronged by that ugly galoot;
it's ok, do as you please and without guilt.  If that's true, fear not;
some will come to your rescue.  

FYI... Culturally, to many, kissing isn't required for love or sex; and
for some, sex has "no" purpose other then creating babies.  You might be
saying, I don't accept that.  
Well, for those folks and many like me, what's actually respected and or
cherished in a marriage to the point of feeling astounding affection and
love for another is the substance motivating the daily actions of their
SO.   I, for one, feel in love with my wife's  substance, not the sex or
kissing; those are just benefits that could leave us any day (God
forbid) due to resulting physical limits.  Then, how does one find the
physical if that's what they base affection and love on.

After reading your posts further, I have to wonder how well the two of
you know each other; and how you related to him during pregnancy and the
roll you've taken on since.  
Signature

SD:)

Doug Anderson - 27 Dec 2006 19:18 GMT
> > And no, I actually don't want him to anymore, it's been too long, and
> > he's pushed away too many times.
>
> Based on a smattering of posts with little substance, sounds as though
> you're looking for folks to say you've been wronged by that ugly
> galoot;

Yes, she may be looking for that.

> it's ok, do as you please and without guilt.  If that's true, fear not;
> some will come to your rescue.  
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> forbid) due to resulting physical limits.  Then, how does one find the
> physical if that's what they base affection and love on.

But unless you are reading different posts from the ones I'm reading,
neither of them are demonstrating love for each other's "substance."
Right?  The kissing is merely a symptom of that.

So the question she should be asking is "since I don't feel like I
love my husband, and he doesn't act like he loves me, what should I
do?"

> After reading your posts further, I have to wonder how well the two of
> you know each other; and how you related to him during pregnancy and the
> roll you've taken on since.  

I think she said she isn't taking any rolls from him at this point!
kate - 27 Dec 2006 20:30 GMT
okay....scenario of my relationship...... I am or should I say was the
very affectionate, admiring loyal loving wife who was blinded by love.
Trust me, one can be too nice and that was me.  Was I a B....during
pregnancy, not at all, I only really wished he would have shown some
intereste and felt the baby kick from time to time without my almost
forcing him.  And Doug is right!!!  No more rolls here!!!!   And sorry,
I haven't quite figured out how to quote, but I am looking for someone
to say yes, I've been wronged!  Without having to aire my dirty laundry
to people we both know.  I'm as you've probably noticed, a very private
person, and I must always carry a front so people think I have the
perfect life, perfect marriage.
And, for the record, my smattering of little posts is because I am
running around doing other things at the same time and have little time
to convey much more than brief comments.  And I do appreciate your
comments and very helpful insight that some of given, and you know who
you are!

And yes, 'kissing' is only a symbol of affection not shown to me.  It's
almost like we are just business partners, or should I say
boss/employee!!  Or, like Tai mentioned.... roomates with benefits!
But the benefits are gone so that leaves us as.... Roomates.

> > > And no, I actually don't want him to anymore, it's been too long, and
> > > he's pushed away too many times.
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> I think she said she isn't taking any rolls from him at this point!
Doug Anderson - 27 Dec 2006 20:42 GMT
> okay....scenario of my relationship...... I am or should I say was the
> very affectionate, admiring loyal loving wife who was blinded by love.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> boss/employee!!  Or, like Tai mentioned.... roomates with benefits!
> But the benefits are gone so that leaves us as.... Roomates.

Here is the rub:  I'm not trying to excuse your husband if he has
behaved badly, but I think responsibility usually lies on both sides.

_If_ your husband has been behaving for years in a way that you don't
like, it was up to you to tell him what you wanted, and to make clear
that by not treating you in a loving way, he risked destroying your
relationship.  It is unfortunate that this didn't happen years ago in
your marriage.  But without trying it now, probably with the help of a
therapist,  I don't know how you can know it is too late.

Unfortunately, being blinded by love may interfere with having a good
relationship.  If one idealizes one's spouse, then maybe ceasing that
idealization goes hand in hand with not feeling love any longer.
Which is a good reason not to idealize people.

If one wants a good honest relationship, it is necessary not to
idealize one's spouse but to love one's spouse while really
understanding who he or she is.  This is the greatest gift you can
have from someone - their love not because you are perfect, but
because you are who you are, with your imperfections.
Casey - 28 Dec 2006 04:12 GMT
kate said

> And, for the record, my smattering of little posts is because I am
> running around doing other things at the same time and have little time
> to convey much more than brief comments.

If you don't spend the time and effort to describe your situation,
don't expect more than just brief comments in return.  You have just as
much time as most of us have.

Casey
S.D. - 27 Dec 2006 20:38 GMT
> But unless you are reading different posts from the ones I'm reading,
> neither of them are demonstrating love for each other's "substance."
> Right?  The kissing is merely a symptom of that.

We're not getting anything more then what suits her needs.  And, yes,
lack of kissing is symptom of something greater.  That said, I don't
know how she's contributed to that result.  
Signature

SD:)

Ellie - 27 Dec 2006 23:43 GMT
>>And no, I actually don't want him to anymore, it's been too long, and
>>he's pushed away too many times.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> SO.   I, for one, feel in love with my wife's  substance, not the sex or
> kissing;

Fascinating. Sorry for being intrusive, but does the "substance" of your
wife include masturbating in front of you? I am only asking because in
the neighboring thread you are arguing that a wife who refuses to
masturbate in front of her husband is "controlling the level of their
intimacy", "abandoned the possibilities of expanding their intimacy in
favor of her personal issues", "he's meeting her needs, she's not
meeting his", and her contribution to the marriage should be questioned.

Now we're learning that kissing isn't required for love, and wanting to
be kissed by one's husband means the woman isn't in love with the
"substance" of her husband but sex or kissing. I can't help but conclude
that kissing is not included in the "substance" but masturbating in
front of spouse is.

You say these rules are "culturally" based. Is that the same culture
(and religion) that you said some of us were "uninformed" about? How
come you didn't want to enlighten us uninformed bunch and tell us what
culture and religion is it that considers refusal to masturbate in front
of husband a breach of marital duty and justification for looking
elsewhere, but doesn't consider refusal to kiss one's wife a big deal?
S.D. - 28 Dec 2006 00:31 GMT
>> [20 quoted lines suppressed]
>
> Fascinating. Sorry for being intrusive,

No your not...

>but does the "substance" of your
> wife include masturbating in front of you? I am only asking because in
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> favor of her personal issues", "he's meeting her needs, she's not
> meeting his", and her contribution to the marriage should be questioned.

Answer in a word - yes...

> Now we're learning that kissing isn't required for love, and wanting to
> be kissed by one's husband means the woman isn't in love with the
> "substance" of her husband but sex or kissing. I can't help but conclude
> that kissing is not included in the "substance" but masturbating in
> front of spouse is.

You extract words, ignore intent, recreat new intent and then twist so
it appears as you wish...
Signature

SD:)

Ellie - 28 Dec 2006 01:56 GMT
>>>[20 quoted lines suppressed]
>>
>>Fascinating. Sorry for being intrusive,
>
> No your not...

I was quite sincere. I don't like prying into people's personal lives,
and would've preferred that your example was not about your wife so my
question didn't have to be personal either. But you gave a personal
example and it directed my question.

>>but does the "substance" of your
>>wife include masturbating in front of you? I am only asking because in
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> You extract words, ignore intent, recreat new intent and then twist so
> it appears as you wish...

What intent? I haven't read all the posts in this thread, and when I saw
an entry from you I expected a VERY different post. I opened your post
thinking that you are going to pass a very harsh judgment on the husband
who refuses to kiss his wife, having seen how you had judged a woman who
didn't want to masturbate in front of her husband. I was quite surprised
to see that at best, you seem to dismiss his action as insignificant,
and at worst justify his lack of affection by appealing to a minimalist
purpose for sex -- and in the process found a way to blame the wife too!

I haven't read enough of your posts to know your overall views, so my
confusion might be the result of lack of familiarity. I couldn't help
thinking if you would have responded the same as the other thread if she
had said that her husband refuses to masturbate in front of her (instead
of refusing to kiss her). And my very trusted gut-feeling said NO, you
wouldn't!

From what I've read so far it seems to me that you subscribe to a very
one sided view of sexual relationship between a man and a woman. One in
which the woman is subservient and primarily in service of the man. This
provides a context for your posts and I understand them better.
S.D. - 28 Dec 2006 21:10 GMT
>I don't like prying into people's personal lives,
>and would've preferred that your example was not about your wife so my
>question didn't have to be personal either. But you gave a personal
>example and it directed my question.

IMO - support isn't about theory or idealism; it's about seeing without
rosy colored glasses and hearing truth all of which comes from from real
life education and experiences pertaining to the subject matter.  I used
the real thing so you knew, in no uncertain terms, the truth, there by
eliminating assumption.

>What intent?

Pre-disposition + assumptions, whether admitted or not.

>I haven't read all the posts in this thread, and when I saw
>an entry from you I expected a VERY different post. I opened your post
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>and at worst justify his lack of affection by appealing to a minimalist
>purpose for sex -- and in the process found a way to blame the wife too!

Above, you demonstrate an uneducated assumption about me, combined with
your predisposition regarding his guilt, based on her perception.  

I didn't dismiss his actions, or lack there of.  All I am aware of is he
quit kissing her, so my judgment regarding him is reserved until I know
what caused such an extreme reaction.

You're mixing different subjects also; the OT from "getting your wife to
masturbate... wanted her to masturbate - motive = more spice in their
already established sex life; and she didn't, due to comfort zone
limits.  I spoke to sexual intimacy aspects of the couple and their
responsibilities towards one another's sexual gratification relating to
marriage over the long term.  Whether you know it or not, there are many
sources for understanding about healthy sexual intimacy.   What we don't
know is, if any, what her deeper issues regarding the subject might be.
I am not associating "rape" or "abuse" or other deeper illnesses because
they already have a basic meat and potatoes sex life.  She's withholding
the gravy, which is cause for question.

In this thread "wondering if I should stay in relationship", I question
the actions of the OP; not her husband, because I am not privy to his
motives.   What first stood out was, not so much the kissing, but, she
was looking for further justification to leave him due to the lack of
kissing and supposed intimacy.

Second was, his drastic withholding of kissing is very uncommon for a
man, yet common for a woman.  So, I am lead to believe deeper "unknown"
issues caused him to withhold, as he has.  Based on what I read, either
she's hasn't clue or she hasn't told all, the later is more likely.
That's where I extrapolated regarding "possible" cultural or religious
motives on his part - example: some African and Muslim sects are very
conservative regarding physical attention.  Who knows...

>From what I've read so far it seems to me that you subscribe to a very
>one sided view of sexual relationship between a man and a woman. One in
>which the woman is subservient and primarily in service of the man. This
>provides a context for your posts and I understand them better.

This is a brazen example of pre-disposition affecting comprehension,
what you think you know vs fact.  You focus "in" on specific words,
extracting others, then apply pre-disposition to come up with woman are
subservient in MY world... You shouldn't be so quick to assume your in
the know...  by doing so, you appear quite the opposite.
LOL -
Signature

SD:)

Ellie - 29 Dec 2006 00:37 GMT
>>I don't like prying into people's personal lives,
>>and would've preferred that your example was not about your wife so my
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> the real thing so you knew, in no uncertain terms, the truth, there by
> eliminating assumption.

That's fine. I just explained because you questioned my sincerity.

> I didn't dismiss his actions, or lack there of.  All I am aware of is he
> quit kissing her, so my judgment regarding him is reserved until I know
> what caused such an extreme reaction.

Do you know *why* the wife in the other thread isn't comfortable
masturbating for her husband?

> You're mixing different subjects also; the OT from "getting your wife to
> masturbate... wanted her to masturbate - motive = more spice in their
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> they already have a basic meat and potatoes sex life.  She's withholding
> the gravy, which is cause for question.

You have said more than that. You have implied that if her husband goes
elsewhere because she is depriving him, the responsibility is on her
shoulders.

> In this thread "wondering if I should stay in relationship", I question
> the actions of the OP; not her husband, because I am not privy to his
> motives.

But you are privy to the motives of the other woman who refuses to
masturbate, right?

> What first stood out was, not so much the kissing, but, she
> was looking for further justification to leave him due to the lack of
> kissing and supposed intimacy.

But you almost gave justification to the action of the other husband to
look elsewhere, didn't you?

> Second was, his drastic withholding of kissing is very uncommon for a
> man, yet common for a woman.  So, I am lead to believe deeper "unknown"
> issues caused him to withhold, as he has.

To quote yourself: Pre-disposition + assumptions, whether admitted or
not. You make your judgments based on the gender of the people involved
in each of these cases, and accuse me of predisposition!

> Based on what I read, either
> she's hasn't clue or she hasn't told all, the later is more likely.
> That's where I extrapolated regarding "possible" cultural or religious
> motives on his part - example: some African and Muslim sects are very
> conservative regarding physical attention.  Who knows...

Has it even occurred to you that the other wife in question may belong
to some culture or religion that frowns upon open masturbation?

>>From what I've read so far it seems to me that you subscribe to a very
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> This is a brazen example of pre-disposition affecting comprehension,
> what you think you know vs fact.

LOL... At least I am aware of my pre-disposition and made sure to
clarify that my judgment may be incomplete or incorrect because I
haven't read enough of your posts to know anything for a fact. That's
why I said "so far it seems to me..."

Your pre-dispositions and prejudices SEEM TO BE totally transparent to you!

>  You focus "in" on specific words,
> extracting others, then apply pre-disposition to come up with woman are
> subservient in MY world... You shouldn't be so quick to assume your in
> the know...  by doing so, you appear quite the opposite.

Yes, I notice that about you very clearly!
S.D. - 29 Dec 2006 15:30 GMT
I am not here to play games with you or anyone else.  If you don't like
what I say "killfile" or ignore me.... I am not going to argue with you.
I am done!
Ellie - 29 Dec 2006 15:49 GMT
> I am not here to play games with you or anyone else.  If you don't like
> what I say "killfile" or ignore me.... I am not going to argue with you.
> I am done!

I understand. I've been a bit too challenging, and you can't respond to
my points (so you call them playing games!). No problem.

As for killfiling you, why in the world would I want to do that? I like
to read views like yours and respond to them. Newsgroup postings are not
personal communications, they are meant for public viewing. So by all
means, ignore my posts if you wish. Those who are interested can read them.
kate - 29 Dec 2006 18:53 GMT
> >>I don't like prying into people's personal lives,
> >>and would've preferred that your example was not about your wife so my
[quoted text clipped - 85 lines]
>
> Yes, I notice that about you very clearly!

Nothing specific happened to provoke his 'drastic withholding of
kissing'.  It happend slowly, he would tighten his lips if I tried to
kiss him, or roll his eyes, or actually push me away, on a regular
basis.  I just stopped trying to kiss him. The rolling of the eyes
started even before I married him, if you can believe that!  What a
fool I am hey?!!  Therefore, within the first year or 2 of marriage it
just stopped.  I have not provoked that in any way, have been loyal,
haven't changed in any way.  When we talk about it, he admits it's him,
not me.  He has intimacy issues, that yes... he needs to work out.  And
yes, I am not sure I want to stick it out anylonger for many other
reasons as well.  He is nasty and mean sometimes, and then other times
he can be nice, which makes it feel like he's really nice.  But that's
not what I was wanting feedback.... simply just the intimacy issue.
And simply wondering if I am the only one who is going through this.
** I really wish I knew how to actually quote specific sentances,
sorry..... it would probably be easier for all to view.

And no, I AM NOT SAYING THESE THINGS TO SUIT ME....nor am I trying to
manipulate your posts - or replies - I am simply writing exactly what I
am thinking.

For example, and not looking for pity, as I mentioned I wasn't going
into this but I will give more detail as to why I don't want to stay
and help him through his intimacy issues....... Christmas evening I
start getting a knot in my stomach waiting for him to lecture me, etc;
I have anxiety issues b/c of his constant nagging, lecturing, putting
me down while praising etc;. And the best one...... understanding that
(my negligence) isn't my fault.... And again, I am aware that this is
wrong behaviour, and not looking for sympathy just explaining why I am
so easily able to leave at this point.   Obviously!  No kissing, no
touching, and constant put downs, control.........

What I write in these posts are things I cannot tell others.  I cannot
tell friends because I don't want them to judge him.  I cannot tell my
family b/c they have their own problems and it will only upset them.
Not to mention that it's embarrassing.  Yes I do have a therapist.

I am a smart person, perhaps not as intellectual as some of you, and I
can see that you are by your posts : )  But I am really intune to
others, there emotions, etc;  I think what I really wanted was to
unload some frustrations, and to get a little feedback, to feel a
little better about things.  And I do, (I have read everyones feedback)
and it's been really helpful, and who knows, maybe one day someone will
look at this post and say... hey, I'm going through the same thing!

And again... please do not say that I am looking for sympathy, or
looking for certain feedback, b/c I don't like to be patrinized, and
that's not the case. (sorry for mis-spelling!)
On a lighter note...... I always wanted to be a therapist!!!!!  I could
have been my best client :)

Okay............ was that a long enough post???  LOL.
Joy - 29 Dec 2006 19:13 GMT
> ** I really wish I knew how to actually quote specific sentances,
> sorry..... it would probably be easier for all to view.

Are you posting through google groups?  If so, at the top of the post you
are replying to you should see something that says "show options".  Click
that, and use the "reply" there at the top, instead of the one at the bottom
of the post.  The one at the top will leave the quotes - just delete the
parts that you don't want, and keep the parts that you want to have in your
reply.
kate - 29 Dec 2006 19:49 GMT
> > ** I really wish I knew how to actually quote specific sentances,
> > sorry..... it would probably be easier for all to view.

- just delete the
> parts that you don't want, and keep the parts that you want to have in your
> reply.

Okay.... I think I've got it now!  Thanks Joy : )
Joy - 29 Dec 2006 19:52 GMT
>> > ** I really wish I knew how to actually quote specific sentances,
>> > sorry..... it would probably be easier for all to view.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Okay.... I think I've got it now!  Thanks Joy : )

You're welcome!
Atalanta Jetson - 29 Dec 2006 20:44 GMT
> Nothing specific happened to provoke his 'drastic withholding of
> kissing'.  It happend slowly, he would tighten his lips if I tried to
> kiss him, or roll his eyes, or actually push me away, on a regular
> basis.  I just stopped trying to kiss him. The rolling of the eyes
> started even before I married him, if you can believe that!  What a
> fool I am hey?!!

Hi, Kate.  If you're looking for encouragement to get out of this
relationship, you'll find my experiences more up your alley.  I
actually think you're quite perceptive - you can actually remember that
he rolled his eyes.  I did the same foolish thing - married someone who
thought affection and so forth was pretty silly.  Frankly, I don't
recall kissing him - although we must have, at some point!  I do recall
eye-rolling (at pet names, affectionate talk, holding hands, etc.)
Sometimes he'd be very affectionate though - other times, he'd be
disdainful.

Therefore, within the first year or 2 of marriage it
> just stopped.  I have not provoked that in any way, have been loyal,
> haven't changed in any way.  When we talk about it, he admits it's him,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> not what I was wanting feedback.... simply just the intimacy issue.
> And simply wondering if I am the only one who is going through this.

Not any more  On another thread, someone (Sheila I think) about how
people in unhappy marriages develop infatuations with people who
represent or provide what they don't have - and I'd have to include
infatuations with non-people (ideas, cultures, places, etc.) as all the
ways I kept myself going without affection (much less love) in my
marriage.  I'd like to ask you - do you think your husband would say he
loves you?  My X eventually stopped saying he loved me (I can't
remember how that happened either), but when pressured, he'd say, "I'm
grateful to you..."   Or his therapist would say, "He DOES love you
but..."  Of course - love must be expressed in a way that the person to
whom it's directed senses it as love, doesn't it?  So - even if your
husband would not say to you, "I love you," I'm asking - would he tell
a third party, perhaps, that he loves you?  That he ever did?  What do
you think he'd say?

Oh, and eventually, of course, I developed infatuations for specific
people (not necessarily sexual infatuations) - and combined all of that
feeling together to gain what I lacked in my marriage.  My X was busy
doing the same thing, I think.

>  ** I really wish I knew how to actually quote specific sentances,
> sorry..... it would probably be easier for all to view.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> so easily able to leave at this point.   Obviously!  No kissing, no
> touching, and constant put downs, control.........

Wow, this is tough.  Part of me wants to urge you to seek counseling
and/or get help with the anxiety, the other part of me wants you to
continue feeling the anxiety so you'll act.

If it's so easy for you to leave at this point - why not leave?  What's
your thinking on why you stay?

> What I write in these posts are things I cannot tell others.  I cannot
> tell friends because I don't want them to judge him.  I cannot tell my
> family b/c they have their own problems and it will only upset them.
> Not to mention that it's embarrassing.  Yes I do have a therapist.

Okay.  That's good you have a therapist - and I totally understand why
you need to post about this anonymously.  I do have to say that when
you finally decide to tell your family (even though it will upset
them), then you are truly ready to leave.  That was the single thing
that kept me in my first marriage the longest (well, that and not being
willing to admit failure in front of my family - but ultimately, that
grew to be an irresistible attraction - it was very liberating to
"fail" at something that everyone else in my family *seems* to be able
to do - and then go on with my life without regard to *their* notions
of success and failure.  Upsetting them was hard - but I realized just
recently that many things I do, if I'm honest, upset some parts of my
family in some way - whereas other parts of my family are entirely
supportive and helpful, rather than focusing on their own "upset."

Anyway, it was this embarrassment/don't upset the elders thing that
kept me in the relationship the last few years.  That's *my* issue -
and looking back, I inflicted a few more years of hell on both of us
(my X and I) due to my unwillingness to be embarrassed or upset people.
He wasn't going to leave - because the services I provided were
inestimably valuable to him.  There's no way he could have gotten from
any series of people, at such low cost, what he got from me - and that
was his bottom line.

> I am a smart person, perhaps not as intellectual as some of you, and I
> can see that you are by your posts : )  But I am really intune to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> and it's been really helpful, and who knows, maybe one day someone will
> look at this post and say... hey, I'm going through the same thing!

Well - I did go through the same thing.  I need to feel that I am not
only loved by my partner, but that I am central to his life - and he,
to mine.  I don't know what kind of "infatuation" that is - but, I need
to be in relationships where I admire the other person (I mean truly
admire them), sense that they are happy and fulfilled, know that I only
add to their fulfillment (and not be the only source of it), and of
course, it's nice to be compatible and have a great sex life too.  In
general, I seek relationships where I admire and enjoy another person,
but I usually can't spend a lot of time with people (I'm a very
intense, serious person - and the only relationships I've ever had
longterm are with other intense, serious people).  So - I've learned my
own failings and flaws and needs, through all this - and the cost of
all this has been considerable, emotionally - as you're finding.  You
can buckle under and do what is expected, I guess, for the rest of your
life.

Or not.  I'm finding that, in some ways, living without the constraints
of "what will people think" isn't as easy as the other way.  But,
instead of wandering around in a fog, pretending things were one way
when they weren't, I think I see things much more clearly (and avoid
certain kinds of relationships altogether - which is *not* necessarily
a good trait - but it's a kind of caution to myself not to let the same
thing happen to me again).

I'm guessing your parents and family of origin very much set you up for
this type of relationship, one in which fear of embarassment and of
hurting someone's feelings - in this case, your husband's are very
strong parameters.  Not that the insight helps fix things - you'll
always feel the consequences of your decision (whatever it is) and
NEITHER decision (staying or going) will be perfect.

For me, though, leaving led to happiness - I can actually utter the
words, "I'm pretty happy!" and not feel the least bit insane.  Lately,
there have been some bumpy things (very bumpy) but I know now that no
matter how bad life gets, I've had some real happiness - and some real
understanding of what life is about.  I'm not sitting around waiting to
die, or depressed, or wondering what people think of me.  I do worry
about other people's feelings, as much as I ever did - I still worry
about my X, but I can see that just like other people, I have my
limits.

Your question is:  how much can you take of this?  It won't get better
- you know that.  So, there you have it.  Would it be better to be
alone or to stay?  My mom ended up deciding on the "alone" gig about 15
years ago, and it takes its toll - yet, she's had amazing experiences
and says she doesn't regret it.  People certainly don't see her the
same way as before the divorce, and that stings still, a little.  She
isn't a better person, necessarily, than when she was married - but she
has experienced happiness.

Oh - and if this is confusing, I should mention I have TWO mothers (a
bio-mom and an adopted mom).

> And again... please do not say that I am looking for sympathy, or
> looking for certain feedback, b/c I don't like to be patrinized, and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Okay............ was that a long enough post???  LOL.

Well, it's obviously my opinion that you need to leave.  Even if you
decide to come back - leaving would be good for you.  I don't believe
there's etiquette to cover divorcing properly, btw.  But, once I
realized that I was substituting a set of friendships and work projects
for my marriage - and that I really had *no family* except my two
children (and the danger of making those two kids into substitute adult
partners always looms in that situation, indeed kids perceive the gap
pretty readily).  You don't seem to have kids - which is really cool,
in terms of leaving.

But, when you really stop and think about it, "leaving him" means
uprooting yourself, establishing entirely new and more honest
relationships with the rest of your family, enduring embarrassment (and
other unpleasant feelings) - and although you'd clearly like to leave
this guy, you need to somehow get yourself ready for the onslaught of
real world consequences (just like on this board, people are going to
react in all manner of ways, not necessarily always helpful).  Oh - and
if you come here enough, you'll get toughened up about embarrassment!

A.
Larry G. - 28 Dec 2006 03:46 GMT
>> And no, I actually don't want him to anymore, it's been too long, and
>> he's pushed away too many times.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> it's ok, do as you please and without guilt.  If that's true, fear not;
> some will come to your rescue.

Please!  Allow me to take this opportunity . . . ;-)

Indeed I think it is fair to say that Kate is extremely hurt by
the repeated rejections, and very disappointed that what should be a
lifelong source of love and happiness should have degenerated into
a virtual prison of emotional abandonment and discouragement.

She has every right to be confused, angry, and to seek divorce.

> FYI... Culturally, to many, kissing isn't required for love or sex; and
> for some, sex has "no" purpose other then creating babies.  You might be
> saying, I don't accept that.

What people do next door, or on the other side of the world, does
not have anything to do with the satisfaction that is missing from
her life.  This little foray into cultural anthropology (as interesting
as it may be), is entirely academic and totally beside the point.

> Well, for those folks and many like me, what's actually respected and or
> cherished in a marriage to the point of feeling astounding affection and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> forbid) due to resulting physical limits.  Then, how does one find the
> physical if that's what they base affection and love on.

Good!  Now you share your own experiences and feelings.  Still,
what works for you, may be of little consequence or value to
Kate.

Best regards,
Larry G.
LAMPS
www.loveandmarriageseminars.com

Signature

Your mind is a terrible thing to waste - TURN OFF YOUR TV!

kate - 30 Dec 2006 19:44 GMT
> Please!  Allow me to take this opportunity . . . ;-)
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Hi Larry,

That is the most perfect way of summing up my entire marriage.
Thank-you!  

Best of luck to you as well!
Kate,
Larry G. - 30 Dec 2006 22:26 GMT
>> Please!  Allow me to take this opportunity . . . ;-)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Best of luck to you as well!
> Kate,

Kate,

Thank you for the kind comments.  I needed them after
running into some "contentious" discussions elsewhere in
this group.

May your coming years be vastly more satisfying than
your most recent few.

Best regards,
Larry G.
LAMPS
www.loveandmarriageseminars.com

Signature

Your mind is a terrible thing to waste - TURN OFF YOUR TV!

Bill in Co. - 30 Dec 2006 22:44 GMT
>>> Please!  Allow me to take this opportunity . . . ;-)
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> running into some "contentious" discussions elsewhere in
> this group.

Contentious discussions????      In here?????
No, say it isn't so!
Casey - 26 Dec 2006 21:28 GMT
kate said
> > hey there,
> > so, having serious intimacy problems in marriage.  My husband stopped
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Is anyone else in relatively new marriage - 6 years, without kissing
> even during sex?

Are you saying he hasn't kissed you since you were married??

Is this a case of he suddenly stopped kissing you one day, or has this
been the general status of your whole relationship?

Casey
kate - 26 Dec 2006 21:33 GMT
> kate said
> > > hey there,
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Casey

stopped for the past 5 years, it was a gradual stop and is the general
status of our whole relationship.  Is this crazy?
news.verizon.net - 27 Dec 2006 17:57 GMT
> Is anyone else in relatively new marriage - 6 years, without kissing
> even during sex?

Do either of you smoke, have gum disease or otherwise poor oral hygiene?
kate - 27 Dec 2006 18:54 GMT
Neither of us smoke, have gum disease, or poor oral hygiene, we floss
twice a day and use Listerine : )  but thanks for the insight.

> > Is anyone else in relatively new marriage - 6 years, without kissing
> > even during sex?
>
> Do either of you smoke, have gum disease or otherwise poor oral hygiene?
Rog' - 26 Dec 2006 20:46 GMT
> so, having serious intimacy problems in marriage.
>  My husband stopped kissing me years ago.
> Would it be selfish of me to leave with a child in the picture?

Why?  Do you have bad breath?  Have you tried marriage
counselling.  If not, why not?  Have you talked to your DH
about this?  If not, why is it that can you put this out on the
internet, but not let him in on the "secret?"

I have no problem with folks leaving, where there's one or
more of the 4-A's (abandoment, abuse, addiction, adultery)
-- and it may be that he's abandoned you both emotionally
and physically -- but IMHO, beofre you do you anything
that sets you on the road to divorce, unless it presents some
personal danger, you have an obligation to discuss this with
him.  If you've done this, and its still hopeless, then proceed.
=R=
kate - 26 Dec 2006 20:50 GMT
wow.. I appreciate your being so candid!  I do not have bad breath, I
visit my DH on a regular basis, that is every six months  : )  I am
also attractive, even more so than we were married.... not bragging,
just being honest.  I have mentioned it to him of course, for that past
few years, I have also spoken to a therapist, just wanted some candid
advice from anonymous listeners.
K.
> > so, having serious intimacy problems in marriage.
> >  My husband stopped kissing me years ago.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> him.  If you've done this, and its still hopeless, then proceed.
> =R=
Rog' - 26 Dec 2006 21:01 GMT
> wow.. I appreciate your being so candid!  I do not have bad breath,
> I visit my DH on a regular basis, that is every six months  : )

We use DH as short-hand for "dear husband," and also
DS for dear son, DSS = dear step-son... etc.

>  I am also attractive, even more so than we were married.... not
> bragging, just being honest.  I have mentioned it to him of course,
> for the past few years, I have also spoken to a therapist, just
> wanted some candid advice from anonymous listeners.
> K.

I still say that he is entitled to know what your thinking is and just
how bad the situation is.  It may be that he's the one who needs
the therapy, not you, or that you both should give it a try.  I did
marriage counselling 2x in my 1st marriage -- at year 7, it worked
wonders; but at yeat 17, it did not.  Even so, IMHO, it was worth
the effort.  =R=
Casey - 26 Dec 2006 21:32 GMT
kate said

> wow.. I appreciate your being so candid!  I do not have bad breath, I
> visit my DH on a regular basis, that is every six months  : )  I am
> also attractive, even more so than we were married.... not bragging,
> just being honest.  I have mentioned it to him of course, for that past
> few years, I have also spoken to a therapist, just wanted some candid
> advice from anonymous listeners.

At first glance, I thought you meant you visited your Dear Husband (DH)
every six months ... that is a lot different from visiting your dental
hygienist.

The big question is, what does your husband say when you mention it to
him?  

In my opinion, you should be having some very serious discussions with
him ... and joint counseling as well.

Casey
Rog' - 27 Dec 2006 03:33 GMT
> wow.. I appreciate your being so candid!  I do not have
> bad breath. I visit my DH on a regular basis, that is every
> six months... I have mentioned it to him of course...
<creative editing>

I agree that you'll find the folk at alt.support.divorce (ASD)
both entertaining /and/ educational.  Frankly, I don't think
that you'd be quite so eager to fly the coop if you were not
already convinced that the grass is greener on the other side
of the fence.  Whoever told you that has commited a fraud.

Unless you already have a guy on the hook, you'll likely find
that, as a divorced mother of young children, many guys will
"kiss" you plenty, but will not commit to anything permanent
as long as your kids need your attention.  How do I know:
I dated a few of such ladies myself, but did not commit to one,
until her kids had left home (at the behest of their father who
wanted to stop paying CS).  =R=
Bill in Co. - 26 Dec 2006 22:01 GMT
> hey there,
> so, having serious intimacy problems in marriage.  My husband stopped
> kissing me years ago.
>
> Would it be selfish of me to leave with a child in the picture?

"selfish"?     Well, by definition, yes.
Tai - 26 Dec 2006 22:05 GMT
> hey there,
> so, having serious intimacy problems in marriage.  My husband stopped
> kissing me years ago.
>
> Would it be selfish of me to leave with a child in the picture?

Yes, it would. But leaving a marriage will be a selfish act whatever the
reasons for going are. A better question is will it be a mistake for you to
leave now?

Further on you say you don't actually want your husband to kiss you anymore
so maybe there is nothing left for you in your marriage. For the sake of any
future relationship you might enter in to perhaps you could do some
self-examination on why you let your situation get to the point of no longer
caring for your husband without trying to do something effective to improve
matters between you two.

If you did want more from this bunch of strangers than just to rubber stamp
your decision, perhaps you could consider going to your husband and telling
him you *will* be leaving unless he is willing to work on your relationship
with you - in marriage counselling if that's what it takes.

Tai
kate - 26 Dec 2006 22:18 GMT
well, one can only tolerate so much rejection.  I have mentioned many
many times over the years. my original question was if anyone else has
experienced this?  Now my question is would any of my new friends stay
with someone who only kissed you in the first year of marriage?  Has
anyone experienced sex with their life partner without kissing for
several years as well?
by the way, I do appreciate your replys : )
> > hey there,
> > so, having serious intimacy problems in marriage.  My husband stopped
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Tai
Tai - 26 Dec 2006 22:22 GMT
> well, one can only tolerate so much rejection.  I have mentioned many
> many times over the years. my original question was if anyone else has
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> several years as well?
> by the way, I do appreciate your replys : )

Kate, I can't help feeling your story is allegorical in nature so I'm going
to step out of the discussion and restrict myself to reading the comments
instead!

Tai
kate - 26 Dec 2006 22:30 GMT
Not sure what allegorical means, if it means untruthful, or just for
sake of conversation.... trust me, I am speaking the truth.  May seem
difficult to believe.  If you were to meet myself and my husband you
would be even more surprised.
> > well, one can only tolerate so much rejection.  I have mentioned many
> > many times over the years. my original question was if anyone else has
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Tai
Joy - 27 Dec 2006 02:41 GMT
> Not sure what allegorical means, if it means untruthful, or just for
> sake of conversation.... trust me, I am speaking the truth.  May seem
> difficult to believe.  If you were to meet myself and my husband you
> would be even more surprised.

Why would we be more surprised?

>> > well, one can only tolerate so much rejection.  I have mentioned many
>> > many times over the years. my original question was if anyone else has
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>> Tai
Tai - 27 Dec 2006 04:45 GMT
> Not sure what allegorical means, if it means untruthful, or just for
> sake of conversation.... trust me, I am speaking the truth.  May seem
> difficult to believe.  If you were to meet myself and my husband you
> would be even more surprised.

I meant that your stated reason for wanting to end your marriage was like
someone saying she needed to amputate her leg because she has a sore toe,
rather than because her whole lower leg was rotting from a couple of
untreated diseases. (Alcoholism and neglect, in your case.)

I don't have anything to add to what others have said. It doesn't sound like
either of you are interested in repairing your marriage and you do seem to
be here looking for permission to be the one who makes it official. Mind
you, it's hard to tell if you have much choice about that unless you are
prepared to continue being "roommates with benefits".

There is something you might like to think about: When you start off as a
married couple isn't part of being a good parent doing one's best to be a
good spouse to your child's other parent?

Tai
Doug Laidlaw - 27 Dec 2006 05:12 GMT
> Not sure what allegorical means, if it means untruthful, or just for
> sake of conversation.... trust me, I am speaking the truth.  May seem
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>
>> Tai

"Unselfish" doesn't mean the same thing as "a doormat."  You are entitled to
say "This isn't the kind of marriage I want.  I feel starved with no
kissing.  I need kissing."  If that is you, then you are entitled to say
that your present marriage doesn't meet your needs.  That is simply looking
after yourself, not being selfish.  I think that Tai meant it that way.

In an English case, in the Court of Appeal, one Judge (obviously a Catholic)
said that a partner who refused sex was refusing to have children, and that
was a ground for divorce.  The other two Judges and 5 members of the House
of Lords were against him - refusal of sex wasn't a ground for divorce.

Our youngest daughter said quite openly that she wanted a lot more affection
in her marriage than we have.

What others would do in your position is irrelevant.  What works for the two
of you?  I am partly in your position (my wife has allowed me a kiss on the
cheek only, and we have been married 35 years,) but being on the other side
of the gender fence, what is right for me won't be right for you.  Even
what is right for another woman won't be right for you.  You are not only a
woman, you are an individual.

I am not sure quite what Tai means by allegorical.  Maybe she
means "hypothetical."  Is this thread simply an exercise?  Would you really
leave?  Where (emotionally) would you go?  If you had a boyfriend in the
wings who satisfies you more, it might be a different scenario.  Then it
becomes real.  But you haven't mentioned one.  Would you leave your husband
and set up on your own?  That might be worse than what you have now.
Doug L.
Signature

Science is organized knowledge. Wisdom is organized life.
  - Immanuel Kant

S.D. - 27 Dec 2006 18:39 GMT
> can't help feeling your story is allegorical in nature so I'm going
> to step out of the discussion and restrict myself to reading the comments
> instead!

Insightful:)
Signature

SD:)

Nina - 26 Dec 2006 22:38 GMT
>well, one can only tolerate so much rejection.  I have mentioned many
>many times over the years. my original question was if anyone else has
>experienced this?  Now my question is would any of my new friends stay
>with someone who only kissed you in the first year of marriage?  Has
>anyone experienced sex with their life partner without kissing for
>several years as well?

Kate, it seems like you're focusing on this one particular thing, the
kissing part, but that there are a whole lot more issues.  So... if
you're looking for someone to say, yes, I've been married for years
and we never kiss but we do have sex...  well, there's very likely
someone out there like that, but probably not a lot.  If you ignore
the specific thing that bugs you, the kissing, and ask... have you
been in a marriage where there is no emotional intimacy but there is
still sex (which is kind of what this sounds like to me), then I bet
that you'd get a lot of "me too" replies.  

I'm curious... what I kind of get from your posts, which aren't
exactly a fountain of information, is that your husband just pushes
you away or something, but that you still have sex... and that prior
to the last 5 years, like when you were dating, during the first year
of marriage, he DID kiss you.  So, did something else happen?  Was
this around the time of the birth of your child?  Is this related to
other loss of emotional intimacy?  And where does the alcohol come
into this?
kate - 26 Dec 2006 22:53 GMT
You're right, I am not a fountain of information here!!  I am keeping
it as short as possible..
Okay, so my relationship:  No emotional contact at all, eg; touching of
the shoulder or hand, kissing, hugging,

He is the alcoholic and has intimacy problems, he's admitted it.  He
agreed to work on it but still hasn't.

The change did when I became pregnant.  I don't think it would be
selfish as a friend once told me that it is also important for children
to see affection in their parents.  That's what is missing in our
relationship no affection.  And as for the sex part, it's been over a
month now b/c I am avoiding it.  He is quite happy to just 'do it'
without a kiss before, during, or after.

> >well, one can only tolerate so much rejection.  I have mentioned many
> >many times over the years. my original question was if anyone else has
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> other loss of emotional intimacy?  And where does the alcohol come
> into this?
Nina - 26 Dec 2006 23:18 GMT
>You're right, I am not a fountain of information here!!  I am keeping
>it as short as possible..

I think we're a group that kind of likes long.  :-)  It's a lot easier
to tell what's going on with a relationship and offer decent advice if
there are more details.

>Okay, so my relationship:  No emotional contact at all, eg; touching of
>the shoulder or hand, kissing, hugging,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>month now b/c I am avoiding it.  He is quite happy to just 'do it'
>without a kiss before, during, or after.

I do think that it's VERY important for children to see affection
between their parents.  I also think that it's even more important for
a child to grow up in a safe and stable environment, and where alcohol
is an issue, the environment is very rarely safe and stable.

You say that what is missing in your relationship is affection... but
is that truly the only thing missing?  Because, if it is, if he is
otherwise the sort of person you want to be with, if he's a good
parent, if you have a relationship that is otherwise all that a
marriage should be, then it's probably worth trying to get him to go
to a marriage counselor and seeing if the relationship can be
salvaged.  But I'm guessing that isn't the case.  I'm guess that
there's a lot more wrong, and the affection is the symptom of deeper
problems... which may be mostly related to alcohol, may be related to
other things, may be related to the interaction between the two of
you... but for whatever reason, it's not a healthy environment for
anyone.
kate - 26 Dec 2006 23:41 GMT
It's a very stable home.  He's a good father and provider.  His
drinking is now limited to at least after the children go to bed.  He
doesn't stagger around drunk or anything like that.  Only I could tell
that he's had a few too many.  Just curious, for your opinion as to why
it is very important for children to see affection between their
parents?  I know it's true, just want your opinion.  But we both do
give our child a lot of affection on a daily basis.  If I left it would
be more of an unstable home.  But I do feel like I am being emotionally
neglected, he's a great father, but a terrible husband!!

> >You're right, I am not a fountain of information here!!  I am keeping
> >it as short as possible..
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> you... but for whatever reason, it's not a healthy environment for
> anyone.
Nina - 27 Dec 2006 00:32 GMT
>It's a very stable home.  He's a good father and provider.  His
>drinking is now limited to at least after the children go to bed.  He
>doesn't stagger around drunk or anything like that.  Only I could tell
>that he's had a few too many.  Just curious, for your opinion as to why
>it is very important for children to see affection between their
>parents?  

Because children learn about relationships by watching the adults in
their life.  Because your child is learning that the way that men and
women should relate to each other is without affection.  Because your
child is learning the role that s/he should play in relationships and
how s/he should treat people, and what s/he is seeing is not normal
nor healthy.  And so, you are very likely tracing the future pattern
of your child's emotional life... and is this what you really want for
him/her?

I didn't, and that's a significant part of the reason I left my first
marriage.  Not the only reason by any means, but one that weighed
heavily with me.
kate - 27 Dec 2006 01:09 GMT
Thank-you  for your very helpful insight.  True, ending a relationship
can teach children to run from problems.  And true, children seeing
this kind of relationship can send wrong message as well.  So much to
consider. Thank-you again for all your help!

> >It's a very stable home.  He's a good father and provider.  His
> >drinking is now limited to at least after the children go to bed.  He
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> marriage.  Not the only reason by any means, but one that weighed
> heavily with me.
Nina - 27 Dec 2006 02:31 GMT
>Thank-you  for your very helpful insight.  True, ending a relationship
>can teach children to run from problems.  And true, children seeing
>this kind of relationship can send wrong message as well.  So much to
>consider. Thank-you again for all your help!

Well, I suppose that ending a relationship *could* teach a child to
run from problems.... but living with someone who treats you with no
affection teaches a child to ignore problems and pretend they don't
exist rather than dealing with them.  And that it's ok to be treated
poorly.  And a lot of other negative things.

I guess, too, that while it's good to be tenacious and stick with
things, teaching a child to always stick to the same path because
anything else is running away or giving up is also a recipe for a VERY
difficult life.
Joy - 27 Dec 2006 02:45 GMT
> Thank-you  for your very helpful insight.  True, ending a relationship
> can teach children to run from problems.  And true, children seeing
> this kind of relationship can send wrong message as well.  So much to
> consider. Thank-you again for all your help!

You might consider going to alt.support.divorce - you can get some insight
into what a divorce would actually be like over there.

You also need to consider what life would really be like if you divorce.
What custody arrangements would you have, for instance?  Half-time with each
parent?  Who gets the children on Thanksgiving?  Christmas?  Easter?  Who
provides their health insurance?  Who would buy their school clothes?  Who
makes the decisions about where they live, where they go to school, where if
anywhere they go to church?  Are you prepared to live in the same school
district as your husband (or ex-husband if it comes to that) until the
children finish school?  What if one of you wants to move out of the area?
Bill in Co. - 27 Dec 2006 03:23 GMT
>> It's a very stable home.  He's a good father and provider.  His
>> drinking is now limited to at least after the children go to bed.  He
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> of your child's emotional life... and is this what you really want for
> him/her?

Do you realize how depressing this really is?   (thinking about her (and no
doubt, many, many, many other's) situations?    And what the kids will turn out
like?   It's almost enough to make one wish they never were born.
kate - 27 Dec 2006 19:00 GMT
I assure you Bill in Co. that my child has a very full and enriched
life.... with plenty of love, and support.  This is an intimacy problem
between two adults, our child doesn't suffer at all.  And furthermore,
depending on how 'grown-up' the adults behave during a break-up the
child can still have every opportunity to lead a fulfilling life
providing they still receive plenty of love and support.  Believe me,
there are alot worse situations than mine.  And if you're referring to
alcohol, I already mentioned that he drinks only after our child's in
bed.  So, my question to you Bill in Co.  how you can say "Makes one
wish they weren't even born...."  I certainly don't wish that...

> >> It's a very stable home.  He's a good father and provider.  His
> >> drinking is now limited to at least after the children go to bed.  He
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> doubt, many, many, many other's) situations?    And what the kids will turn out
> like?   It's almost enough to make one wish they never were born.
Doug Anderson - 27 Dec 2006 19:08 GMT
> I assure you Bill in Co. that my child has a very full and enriched
> life.... with plenty of love, and support.  This is an intimacy problem
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> bed.  So, my question to you Bill in Co.  how you can say "Makes one
> wish they weren't even born...."  I certainly don't wish that...

Don't get too bent out of shape about Bill.  The sunrise makes him
wish he'd never been born, so you have to take his lamentations with a
grain of salt.

In fact, the only thing that seems to cheer him up is lamenting how
much worse everyone else is than he is, so you may have brightened his
day.
Bill in Co. - 27 Dec 2006 22:13 GMT
>> I assure you Bill in Co. that my child has a very full and enriched
>> life.... with plenty of love, and support.  This is an intimacy problem
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> much worse everyone else is than he is, so you may have brightened his
> day.

Doesn't cheer me up.     It just further depresses me.    You know what they say
about  a-s-s-u-m-p-t-i-o-n-s.    Or at least you should know.
Casey - 27 Dec 2006 21:36 GMT
kate said

> > Do you realize how depressing this really is?   (thinking about her (and no
> > doubt, many, many, many other's) situations?    And what the kids will turn out
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> bed.  So, my question to you Bill in Co.  how you can say "Makes one
> wish they weren't even born...."  I certainly don't wish that...

Kate, meet Bill - he desperately searches for the cloud behind every
silver lining.

Casey
Doug Anderson - 27 Dec 2006 00:32 GMT
> It's a very stable home.  He's a good father and provider.  His
> drinking is now limited to at least after the children go to bed.  He
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> be more of an unstable home.  But I do feel like I am being emotionally
> neglected, he's a great father, but a terrible husband!!

What you should think about is what sort of model you are setting up
for your children.  Your marriage will be what they have in mind as
the model for their marriage.

If you are emotionally distant from each other, that is what they will
grow up thinking marriage is like.

If you are affectionate, they'll grow up thinking it is like that.

If you get divorced, they'll grow up thinking that marriages with
problems are to be ended.

If you work on your marriage and improve it, they'll grow up thinking
that marriages with problems should be worked on and improved.

What message would you like them to have?
shinypenny - 28 Dec 2006 23:16 GMT
> You're right, I am not a fountain of information here!!  I am keeping
> it as short as possible..
> Okay, so my relationship:  No emotional contact at all, eg; touching of
> the shoulder or hand, kissing, hugging,

Some people are just not all that affectionate. I personally couldn't
be married to someone like that (I like lots of cuddles and hugs and
touches throughout the day), but to each his own!

> He is the alcoholic and has intimacy problems, he's admitted it.  He
> agreed to work on it but still hasn't.

I do believe that just because a person is more reserved and not
naturally affectionate, doesn't mean they can't enjoy a highly intimate
and rewarding relationship. For example, some couples are "mindmates"
and relate on a more cerebral level.

But it sounds to me like your DH's issues go beyond basic personality
type and preferences. The alcoholism is a great big clue that he is
retreating from the intimacy of your relationship on purpose.

> The change did when I became pregnant.  I don't think it would be
> selfish as a friend once told me that it is also important for children
> to see affection in their parents.  That's what is missing in our
> relationship no affect