Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Marriage / Marriage / January 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is meeting discreetly at an out of town motel considered cheating?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jwb - 24 Jan 2007 21:43 GMT
well?
Signature

JWB

Emma Anne - 24 Jan 2007 22:12 GMT
> well?

707!  (That's LOL, but you fell out of your chair from laughing so hard,
and so you are upside down)
Stephanie - 24 Jan 2007 22:17 GMT
> well?

I dunno. I kinda thought discussing thrusts per second was kinda close to
cheating, myself.
Tai - 24 Jan 2007 22:19 GMT
> well?

Okay, you made me laugh out loud but you also reminded of that old
question...

You know - the one where someone leaps on a stranger in the street and beats
them furiously all over. He should go to jail, right?

Answer:  Not if he's putting out flames.

So.... if you are meeting someone discreetly in a motel to plan a surprise
party for your spouse, yes that's perfectly proper!

Tai
( I *must* have something more productive to do!)
NewMan - 24 Jan 2007 22:53 GMT
I was gonna say...

MEETING at the motel MAY appear highly suspect, but could be perfectly
innocent!

The bottom line is what - precisely - is being done while at the motel
and with whom! :)

>> well?
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Tai
>( I *must* have something more productive to do!)
Atalanta, O.G. - 24 Jan 2007 23:27 GMT
> well?
> --
> JWB

Hahaha.  Let's see how far the discussion goes on this one.

And for the record - is it you and me who are meeting?  If it is - I'd
say no, it isn't cheating - neither of us would cheat, motel or not.
And certainly not with each other.

A.
Grace - 25 Jan 2007 08:59 GMT
> well?
> --
> JWB

And then you try to write it off on Sked C as a business expense?

Grace
Rog' - 25 Jan 2007 10:28 GMT
> And then you try to write it off on Sked C as a business expense?

Sure.  A true entrepenuer would rent the room for /business meetings./
= Rog' =
"I've developed a new philosophy... I only dread one day at a time."
--- Charles Schulz (Charlie Brown in Peanuts)
Grace - 26 Jan 2007 19:12 GMT
> > And then you try to write it off on Sked C as a business expense?Sure.  A true entrepenuer would rent the room for /business meetings./
> = Rog' =

Well, of course.  Sure.  and then of course, he's already writing all
the dates off as client dinners.

A true entrepreneur would hire her as a consultant, lease her a company
car, give her an apartment/satelite office and take her on fact finding
business junkets to interesting far away locations.

Grace
ontshwantsalemang@gmail.com - 25 Jan 2007 09:53 GMT
> well?
> --
> JWB

uuuuuh, what are you getting up to there?
HotFlashesColdTears - 25 Jan 2007 10:48 GMT
> well?

Or to lie in bed with a friend, naked, for an hour or more, not meaning any
harm?

"Othello"  William Shakespeare
AllYou! - 25 Jan 2007 11:55 GMT
> well?

By discreet, do you mean purposefully deceiving your partner, or do
you mean keeping from disclosing that meeting because you know that it
would bother your partner?

By someone, do you mean someone (e.g., mother, sister, etc) with whom
it's virtually impossible to have a romantic or sexual relationship,
or do you mean someone who doesn't fall into that category?

Why do you ask such an open ended question?
NewMan - 25 Jan 2007 15:26 GMT
>> well?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>By someone, do you mean someone (e.g., mother, sister, etc) with whom
>it's virtually impossible to have a romantic or sexual relationship,

Awe c'mon! There are LOTS of places where it is possible the have a
romantic sexual relationship with your sister or mother.

<shivers>

>or do you mean someone who doesn't fall into that category?
>
>Why do you ask such an open ended question?
DrLith - 25 Jan 2007 12:16 GMT
> well?

It's not considered cheating if you ejaculate less than a minute after
inserting your penis in her vagina. It's kind of like the 5-second rule
for food on the floor.
Rog' - 25 Jan 2007 14:32 GMT
> ... It's kind of like the 5-second rule for food on the floor.

All these years, I've been using 3-seconds.
Five seconds?  Woo-Hoo!
Casey - 26 Jan 2007 13:43 GMT
Rog' said
> > ... It's kind of like the 5-second rule for food on the floor.
>
> All these years, I've been using 3-seconds.
> Five seconds?  Woo-Hoo!

I hate to be a party-pooper, but ....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBusters_episodes:_Season_3#Five-
second_Rule

Casey
Tai - 26 Jan 2007 14:00 GMT
> Rog' said
>>> ... It's kind of like the 5-second rule for food on the floor.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBusters_episodes:_Season_3#Five-
> second_Rule

I so did not want to know this!

Tai
Rog' - 26 Jan 2007 16:52 GMT
>> > ... It's kind of like the 5-second rule for food on the floor.
> I hate to be a party-pooper, but ....
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBusters_episodes:_Season_3#Five-second_Rule

I'll take my chances.  It hasn't killed me, yet.
Sarah Lister - 27 Jan 2007 14:28 GMT
> Rog' said
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBusters_episodes:_Season_3#Five-
> second_Rule

I've seen that episode and although I worship the Mythbusters (my
husband looks like Adam and acts like Jamie :-)) they didn't do a very
good test on this 'myth'.  Specifically, they didn't test food that
*hadn't* been on the floor to see if it too had germs on it.

Sarah
DrLith - 27 Jan 2007 15:22 GMT
>> Rog' said
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> good test on this 'myth'.  Specifically, they didn't test food that
> *hadn't* been on the floor to see if it too had germs on it.

Control 'schmole.
Rog' - 27 Jan 2007 15:27 GMT
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBusters_episodes:_Season_3#Five-
>> second_Rule
> ... they didn't do a very good test on this 'myth'.  Specifically, they
> didn't
> test food that *hadn't* been on the floor to see if it too had germs on it.

Ah, ha!  They needed a control group to which they could compare the
dropped food, to determine the relative safety of dropped food.  Absent
that, who's to say that its much worse than undropped food.  :-)
Vulnero - 26 Jan 2007 03:29 GMT
> > well?It's not considered cheating if you ejaculate less than a minute after
> inserting your penis in her vagina. It's kind of like the 5-second rule
> for food on the floor.

NOW you tell me!  To think of all those years I have wasted...
ginger - 26 Jan 2007 05:45 GMT
I"m cracking up... seriously

> > well?It's not considered cheating if you ejaculate less than a minute after
> inserting your penis in her vagina. It's kind of like the 5-second rule
> for food on the floor.
Rog' - 26 Jan 2007 05:48 GMT
> I"m cracking up... seriously

There's a cream that you can use for that.  :-)
Grace - 26 Jan 2007 18:43 GMT
It's not considered cheating if you ejaculate less than a minute after
> inserting your penis in her vagina. It's kind of like the 5-second rule
> for food on the floor.

If he makes a practice of doing that at home, too, his wife may be the
one renting the motel for extracurriculars.

Grace
S.D. - 25 Jan 2007 17:33 GMT
> well?

Your answer might be more palatable if you ask "Bill Clinton".  Better
yet, check with Hillary, one of the Democratic party's newest
presidential candidates; her understanding should have a broad meaning
Signature

SD:)

Doug Laidlaw - 27 Jan 2007 04:18 GMT
> well?

Meeting whom? And what do you propose to do at the motel?  You know the
answer as well as I do.

Doug L.
Signature

How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single moment before starting to
improve the world.
  - Anne Frank.

Doug Laidlaw - 28 Jan 2007 13:31 GMT
>> well?
>
> Meeting whom? And what do you propose to do at the motel?  You know the
> answer as well as I do.
>
> Doug L.

Further, I wouldn't give you a job, except under direct supervision.  A man
who can disregard his marriage vows and persuade himself that he really
hasn't, will do the same in any position of trust in a business.  You are
too dangerous.

Doug L.
Signature

All we are given is possibilities - to make of ourselves one thing or
another. - Ortega y Gasset
You aren't just cheating on your wife. In the end, you are cheating on
yourself.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.