Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Marriage / Marriage / October 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I need some advice - His and Hers Stuff

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Phil Tusa - 26 Sep 2007 02:12 GMT
Greetings to all ...  I need some help here, please.

My lovely wife and I have been married for 7 1/2 years.  We lived
together for about 6 months before we married. (I moved in to her
house and sold mine,  Sometimes, I feel this may have been a
mistake.)

She likes to hold on to stuff. She is a bit of a "pack-rat" and a
procrastinator. I'm not saying its right or wrong - that is just how
she is.  

I am the kind of guy who likes to evaluate once a year or so what
to keep and not. Sometimes I throw stuff out and sometimes not.

Over the years we have had various disagreements about keeping
and throwing away stuff in the house.

She also loves to pile up the magazines 10 - 12 inches high on
the coffee table. I have asked her to please "purge" that pile of
magazines - to no avail. She has various magazines as far back
as 2-3 years ago. So many there is another basket full underneath
the coffee table of these mags. IMHO, This is totally ridiculous.

The end table next to the couch has more magazines and other stuff
that has been there for months!  She just loves to let stuff pile up.
I have asked  - to no avail.

I prefer the kitchen table to be free of all items - instead she comes
in piles her stuff on the table each and every day.  She leaves stuff
on the kitchen table.  I was raised the kitchen table is for eating
NOT storing stuff on it. It's fun eating dinner with all of her stuff
on the table. I hate it! I have asked her to clear off the table - to
no avail.

She has a paper bag that she has kept near the kitchen table  
it's been there - for a year full of her school stuff.  I have tried
to get her to figure out what to do with that bag - and the stuff
in it - it's still sitting there - on the floor...

She for some reason has hung on to alot of her mothers stuff. Bags
of coffee and various other items. I have asked her about it and she
response with "That was mother's..." Her mother died in Nov, 1993.

In our study, there are books piled up on shelves - not so neatly. I
have asked that WE re-organize the book shelves and evalute what
books she wants to keep and to get rid of - to no avail. I cannot
stand it!

Each time I EVEN think about pushing the issue, I think about the
times she gets VERY ANGRY and starts yelling at me - throwing stuff
and accusing me of "not respecting her stuff...".  I then think about
the times we sleep in seperate bedrooms, not speaking for a week,
eating seperate meals and so forth.  

I feel I have "vented" enough and could  really could use some
good advice, please.

Phil
zorra - 26 Sep 2007 04:27 GMT
> Greetings to all ...  I need some help here, please.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Over the years we have had various disagreements about keeping
> and throwing away stuff in the house.

First of all, be aware that this could grow into a real problem.  I
don't know if your wife is like this, or on her way to becoming like
this, but there are people who are packrats to such an extreme that
they will not throw away a newspaper or a coupon, and end up turning
their houses into firetraps.  Given her extreme protective nature over
seemingly inconsequential stuff, there is a possibility that your wife
might become one of these.   If so, I expect she'd need professional
help.

On the other hand, maybe it's not that bad.  If not, it might just be
a matter of helping her get organized.  Can you build shelves in the
basement, garage, or an extra room?  Perhaps negotiate that certain
areas of the house be clutter free?

Zorra
Phil - 26 Sep 2007 10:15 GMT
Hi Zorra ...

>First of all, be aware that this could grow into a real problem.  I
>don't know if your wife is like this, or on her way to becoming like
>this, but there are people who are packrats to such an extreme that
>they will not throw away a newspaper or a coupon, and end up turning
>their houses into firetraps.  

She is not to that extreme.  I have heard and seen that type of
extreme behavior on TV documentaries.

> If so, I expect she'd need professional help.

After yesterday evening, I would really like for us to go into
marriage conseling and tackle this issue.  I really do love and
respect this person and have no desire to get a divorce.

>On the other hand, maybe it's not that bad.  
>If not, it might just be a matter of helping her get organized.  

I would love to help her get better organized.  I just need to apprach
this diplomatically.  There's got to be a mutual solution.  Just need
to give it some more thought.

>Can you build shelves in the basement, garage, or an extra room?  

Yes, I have thought of that. We have an extra bedroom I might be able
to fix us some shelves.

>Perhaps negotiate that certain areas of the house be clutter free?

I have also thought of that and am trying to figure out what areas she
will be receptive as "clutter free" areas.

Many thanks for your response.

Phil
LarryG - 26 Sep 2007 04:35 GMT
> Greetings to all ...  I need some help here, please.
>
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
> Phil

It sounds a lot like you were both raised by families with very
dissimilar 'house rules' about storage, tidyness and personal
possessions.  It is very likely that you are both also very *loyal*
to your individual upbringings and family customs.  However,
the reality is, that there is no absolute right or wrong way to
conduct oneself in such matters, as long as neither of you is
destroying or discarding the other's stuff.

One of the things you can do, short of getting a divorce or
becoming abusive, is to negotiate your own house rules that
both of you can agree to.  If you cannot find one set of rules
which pleases you both, consider taking turns choosing
rooms of dominion and responsibility.  If your wife wants to
pile things on the kitchen table, you might choose to rule the
living room where the lack of clutter is more appropriate for
entertaining guests.  Each of you take turns choosing a
room or area (such as the front yard) until there are none left
to claim responsibility for.

The alternative to negotiation is for one or both of you to get
uptight, defensive, angry and divorced.  If you find yourselves
headed in this direction, ask yourselves if it is really worth it
to pursue your childhood habits?  And, can you really live with
someone who will not respect the other partner as an equal in
the relationship?

Good luck,
Larry G.
Phil - 26 Sep 2007 10:54 GMT
Hi Larry ... I liked your response. Very thought provoking.

>It sounds a lot like you were both raised by families with very
>dissimilar 'house rules' about storage, tidyness and personal
>possessions.  

Yes, I think you are correct.  

>It is very likely that you are both also very *loyal*
>to your individual upbringings and family customs.  However,
>the reality is, that there is no absolute right or wrong way to
>conduct oneself in such matters, as long as neither of you is
>destroying or discarding the other's stuff.

She has accuse me of discarding her stuff without her permission.

I think the root problem is I get frustrated seeing, what I feel is to
much of her stuff. I then ask her to evaluate what see needs and
then takes no action.  This is frustrating for me.

However, on the other hand, she feels the need to hang on to stuff
which is certainly well within her rights.  

>One of the things you can do, short of getting a divorce or
>becoming abusive, is to negotiate your own house rules that
>both of you can agree to.  

Negotiate house rules. Not a bad idea. I wonder after all these years
if that is going to be possible?  Will she be receptive to possible
negotiations?  

I have no desire to walk away and get a divorce. And I refuse to quit
our relationship as well.

We get along well, and actually respect each other. This stuff issue
is the major problem and I just want to find a "happy medium" where
WE are both satisfied. That's it.

>If you cannot find one set of rules which pleases you both,
>consider taking turns choosing rooms of dominion and responsibility.  
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Each of you take turns choosing a room or area (such as the front yard)
>until there are none left to claim responsibility for.

That idea never occurred to me ... That is very good. I need to think
about this a bit more. Great Idea!

>The alternative to negotiation is for one or both of you to get
>uptight, defensive, angry and divorced.  

Yes, that is a very good point.  Yesterday evening someone really
got uptight, defensive, angry.  

>If you find yourselves headed in this direction, ask yourselves if it is
>really worth it to pursue your childhood habits?  

Good point. Is it really worth getting upset over some extra stuff on
the kitchen table - if we find ourselves splitting up? I THINK NOT!

>And, can you really live with someone who will not respect the
>other partner as an equal in the relationship?

This is a question, I wonder if she is asking herself.  We had an
argument yesterday evening, she got very mad at me and I wonder
if she is questioning that this morning.  I wonder?

>Good luck ...

Thanks Larry, I think I am going to need it.

Phil
Grace - 26 Sep 2007 05:59 GMT
> Greetings to all ...  I need some help here, please.

> She likes to hold on to stuff. She is a bit of a "pack-rat" and a
> procrastinator. I'm not saying its right or wrong - that is just how
> she is.  


> I feel I have "vented" enough and could  really could use some
> good advice, please.
>
> Phil

Try alt.recovery.clutter

Most of the posters are in your wife's  postion, in various stages of
licking the habit.  All are exceptionally nice and supportive and
there are fabulous tips.  About half of the people there have gotten
their act together and are just there to keep it that way and give
support.

You won't' be the first or last "spouse of" to show up looking for
help, advice and a place to vent.

Good luck.

Grace
Phil - 26 Sep 2007 10:55 GMT
Thanks Grace ...

>Try alt.recovery.clutter

>You won't' be the first or last "spouse of" to show up looking for
>help, advice and a place to vent.

Phil
Emma Anne - 26 Sep 2007 16:42 GMT
> You won't' be the first or last "spouse of" to show up looking for
> help, advice and a place to vent.

More venting than help, I'll bet.  No slur on them - I just think this
is a largely intractable problem.
Rog' - 26 Sep 2007 07:06 GMT
> My lovely wife and I have been married for 7 1/2 years.  We lived
> together for about 6 months before we married. (I moved in to her
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> about the times we sleep in seperate bedrooms, not speaking for a
> week, eating seperate meals and so forth.

My first wife was like that.  Our solution was to set aside one room
in the house just for her stuff.  One and 1/2 walls were lined wtih
narrow (6") bookshelves (home-built).  It was "her" room and we
kept the door closed.  But you may want to try counselling b4 letting
this issue destroy your marriage.  =R=
Phil - 26 Sep 2007 11:05 GMT
Hi Rog ...

>Our solution was to set aside one room in the house just
>for her stuff.  One and 1/2 walls were lined wtih narrow (6")
>bookshelves (home-built).  

I did that in a closet - just for her years ago while we were dating.
It obviously was not enough since it has spilled out all over the
house, kitchen, living room etc.etc.  It's ridiculous!

> It was "her" room and we kept the door closed.  

I am considering giving her the "middle bedroom" as
her room - good idea, thanks.

> But you may want to try counselling b4 letting
>this issue destroy your marriage.

Yeah ... I have no desire to walk away and give up - however
after our disagreement yesterday evening - I am not sure how is
feeling this morning.   I really want to resolve this issue I really
do.

Thanks;
Phil
Caitriona Mac Fhiodhbhuidhe - 26 Sep 2007 13:45 GMT
> Hi Rog ...
<snipped>

> > It was "her" room and we kept the door closed.  
>
> I am considering giving her the "middle bedroom" as
> her room - good idea, thanks.

Something you might want to watch, though - what you wrote above,
about "giving" her one of the rooms... sounds a bit paternal, doesn't
it?  Like you're the parent and you're "allowing" her a particular
space in her own home, the home that was hers before it was both of
yours.

Might want to look at how you're approaching this issue with her.  If
you're coming across as patronizing or parental, you're setting
yourself up for more grief.

Kitten
Rog' - 26 Sep 2007 14:05 GMT
>> "I am considering giving her the 'middle bedroom' as
>> her room - good idea, thanks."
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> space in her own home, the home that was hers before it was both of
> yours.

Oh, please.  It's also his room/space that she's occupying more and
more of.  But perhaps "designating" or "setting aside" for exclusive use
would have fewer connotations.
Vickie - 26 Sep 2007 15:18 GMT
> >> "I am considering giving her the 'middle bedroom' as
> >> her room - good idea, thanks."
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> more of.  But perhaps "designating" or "setting aside" for exclusive use
> would have fewer connotations.

No.  I think Cait is totally correct in this.  I bet she would feel
peeved and might just out and out refuse to acquiesce if he words it
wrong.

Yeah, I know it sucks.  I mean I get tired of all the negotiating
rules too.  But is it more about being right or actually getting the
end result you want?

Vickie
Phil - 26 Sep 2007 20:24 GMT
Hi Kitten ...

Excellent point, thanks for the clarification.  Shame on me :(

>about "giving" her one of the rooms... sounds a bit paternal, doesn't
>it?  Like you're the parent and you're "allowing" her a particular
>space in her own home, the home that was hers before it was both of
>yours. Might want to look at how you're approaching this issue with her.  
>If you're coming across as patronizing or parental, you're setting
>yourself up for more grief.

Phil
shinypenny - 26 Sep 2007 15:13 GMT
> > It was "her" room and we kept the door closed.  
>
> I am considering giving her the "middle bedroom" as
> her room - good idea, thanks.

My DH is the pack-rat, and I'm the neat-freak who likes to keep things
decluttered. We negotiated, and he gets the guest bedroom and the
basement as his personal dumping ground.

The way it works around here - our deal - is that if he leaves his
stuff lying about the other rooms, I pick it up and relocate it to the
guest bedroom. (i.e., if you do this with your DW, don't expect her to
put her own stuff away in the middle bedroom - you will probably have
to move it for her). We keep the door closed at all times.

Since this is our only guest bedroom, we also have a deal that when
guests come to stay, he has to tidy up and clean the guest bedroom and
make it presentable. As part of this deal, I am not to nag, remind, or
spaz out in anxiety ... even if he waits until the very last minute
(which he usually does). But a few times a year, he'll get in there
and clean it out completely - by that, I mean he will bag up most of
the stuff and relocate it temporarily to the basement until the guests
leave.  Then it slowly makes it's way back into the house, bit-by-bit,
where it gets promptly dumped back in the guest bedroom by me. :-)

The basement is another story entirely. I give up going down there,
because it's a disaster. There's a small corner for my stuff, and
things like xmas decorations. If I need something, I send him down
there to dig it out.

As for the magazine pile, we negotiated a solution to that, and he's
kept up with it: anytime a new issue arrives, we throw out the old one
(we, meaning, whomever happened to get the mail that day - we *both*
do this as a habit). So at any given time, there's only maybe 5
magazines stacked on the coffee table.

My DH had a rough childhood, growing up with a mother who is
schizophrenic. While his father was away serving in the army, things
unraveled. He was barely 5 years old, the oldest of 4 siblings, and he
has memories of rummaging in the garbage to find food. This is where
his pack-rat mentality comes from, and it's deep-rooted. But, he is
getting better, he does recognize it's an emotional issue. He saw one
of those shows on t.v., with some woman who'd collected so much stuff,
it filled her apartment, and she got evicted. After seeing that show,
he's been trying to slowly declutter stuff. Every few days, he'll
throw something out. It's progress (even if he brings in three new
trash-picked things for every one he throws away!!).

So while I do think that this can and should be negotiated - so that
your need for a clean environment in the main areas is addressed - you
also need to be loving, accepting,  understanding and patient. It
could be that her need for clutter is just as strong as your need for
clean.

Good luck!

jen
Doug Anderson - 27 Sep 2007 00:43 GMT
> As for the magazine pile, we negotiated a solution to that, and he's
> kept up with it: anytime a new issue arrives, we throw out the old one
> (we, meaning, whomever happened to get the mail that day - we *both*
> do this as a habit).

Aack!  You throw it away!!!

Can't imagine.  I actually am reading a weekly publication from July
at the moment.  And I have older ones that I really will read!
Lauri - 27 Sep 2007 01:50 GMT
>> As for the magazine pile, we negotiated a solution to that, and he's
>> kept up with it: anytime a new issue arrives, we throw out the old one
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Can't imagine.  I actually am reading a weekly publication from July
>at the moment.  And I have older ones that I really will read!

I keep magazine around for several months.  I hate to throw them away
because it seems so wasteful; they're expensive and just because
they've been read once doesn't make the useless!  So I normally take
them to work to put on the breakroom table.  People will either read
them on breaks or take them home; either is fine with me.  I'll also
give them to my sister or my mom.  Throwing them out is my last
choice.
Signature

Lauri in WA

shinypenny - 27 Sep 2007 02:00 GMT
> I keep magazine around for several months.  I hate to throw them away
> because it seems so wasteful; they're expensive and just because
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> give them to my sister or my mom.  Throwing them out is my last
> choice.

Try just not subscribing, if you're worried about waste!

We only subscribe to a small number... the rest are sent to us,
unbidden, by various universities DH attended at one time, or
another.

jen
Lauri - 27 Sep 2007 02:30 GMT
>> I keep magazine around for several months.  I hate to throw them away
>> because it seems so wasteful; they're expensive and just because
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>unbidden, by various universities DH attended at one time, or
>another.

I don't find the magazines themselves wasteful; I only subscribe to a
few and I really like (and read!) those.  It's taking a big, thick,
beautiful magazine that's just been read once that seems wasteful to
me.  I'd much rather let someone else have the chance to enjoy it than
just toss it away when I'm done.
Signature

Lauri in WA

Tracey - 27 Sep 2007 04:15 GMT
>>>I keep magazine around for several months.  I hate to throw them away
>>>because it seems so wasteful; they're expensive and just because
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> me.  I'd much rather let someone else have the chance to enjoy it than
> just toss it away when I'm done.

That's why I snip the address label off and give them out to the local
Red Cross at Tripler Army hospital. They replace the ones in waiting
rooms and use some on their book carts. I also will occasionally drop
off a load of books and magazines to the military equivalent of a
Ronald McDonald house (they're called Fisher Houses. Families stay
in them when a family member is undergoing treatment at the local
hospital.)

Tracey
shinypenny - 27 Sep 2007 15:17 GMT
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:00:04 -0700, shinypenny
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> me.  I'd much rather let someone else have the chance to enjoy it than
> just toss it away when I'm done.

Unfortunately since I don't go into an office every day, I can't leave
them in break rooms. And DH bikes to work - he has enough to carry in
his backpack. With the exception of two magazines that my kids ordered
me for xmas last year during their yearly magazine drive, I only ever
buy magazines these days when I'm flying somewhere. Then I *do* pass
them along once I'm done reading it. The other four magazines we get
are DH's alumni magazines, which actually are pretty interesting and
we both read them. But it wouldn't bother me if he told them to stop
sending them to him. He won't though - he likes having his spread of
ivy league titles on the coffee table for guests to see. :-)

I used to subscribe to and read TONS of magazines (originally my dream
was to work for a magazine - but the pay was too lousy). I was pretty
passionate about my glossy, beautiful magazines!! And I would never
throw them out. But when I moved out of my apartment and had to figure
out a way to haul off stacks and stacks of years and years of
magazines, that was when I said enough's enough! It is wasteful just
to subscribe to begin with, IMO. We also do not subscribe to any
newspapers, for the same reason.

I agree that it's nice to curl up in bed with a magazine, rather than
read on the internet. But oh well. I curl up with books instead.

The other truth is that I've gotten bored with many magazines, the
ones I subscribed to and read for years. Something like a news
magazine is one thing, but glamour mags, women's mags, hobby mags,
sports mags, even the financial advice mags... the special-interest
magazines...  all end up rehashing the same articles over and over
again, if you read them long enough. It's enough for me to buy one or
two of those as a treat when I fly, or to wait until I'm in a doctor's
office to get my dose.

Incidentally, I did try to dump some of my stacks on my doctor,
dentist, and even the local library... and all three refused to take
them. They get their own subscriptions, apparently!

jen
Vickie - 27 Sep 2007 02:00 GMT
> On 26 Sep 2007 16:43:43 -0700, Doug Anderson
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> choice.
> --

Recycle in general paper recycle.

Vickie
Lauri - 27 Sep 2007 02:35 GMT
>> them to work to put on the breakroom table.  People will either read
>> them on breaks or take them home; either is fine with me.  I'll also
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Recycle in general paper recycle.

I already have a solution.....I give them away so others can enjoy
them.  Recycling a magazine that's been barely touched also seems
wasteful, but less so than just throwing it in the garbage.
Signature

Lauri in WA

Vickie - 27 Sep 2007 05:39 GMT
> >> them to work to put on the breakroom table.  People will either read
> >> them on breaks or take them home; either is fine with me.  I'll also
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> them.  Recycling a magazine that's been barely touched also seems
> wasteful, but less so than just throwing it in the garbage.

Guess I am wasteful.  I recycle.

Vickie
Nina - 27 Sep 2007 02:01 GMT
>>> As for the magazine pile, we negotiated a solution to that, and he's
>>> kept up with it: anytime a new issue arrives, we throw out the old one
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>give them to my sister or my mom.  Throwing them out is my last
>choice.

I take them to doctor's offices.  But I also steal them from offices.
:-)  Recycling.
shinypenny - 27 Sep 2007 01:58 GMT
On Sep 26, 7:43 pm, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovet...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > As for the magazine pile, we negotiated a solution to that, and he's
> > kept up with it: anytime a new issue arrives, we throw out the old one
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Can't imagine.  I actually am reading a weekly publication from July
> at the moment.  And I have older ones that I really will read!

But there's no back article that you can't find on the internet.
That's the way we look at it, anyway. Most magazines today allow
access to the older issues - it's just the current issue that you
can't get online right away!

jen
Doug Anderson - 27 Sep 2007 03:40 GMT
> On Sep 26, 7:43 pm, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovet...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> access to the older issues - it's just the current issue that you
> can't get online right away!

But reading a magazine is _much_ nicer for me than reading something
on the internet.  (And in my case I really _do_ read though - not
every article, but I look at every page - the magazines I get.  But
sometimes not for 6 months or longer!)
Lauri - 27 Sep 2007 04:25 GMT
>> But there's no back article that you can't find on the internet.
>> That's the way we look at it, anyway. Most magazines today allow
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>every article, but I look at every page - the magazines I get.  But
>sometimes not for 6 months or longer!)

I agree.  I like to curl up on the sofa with a book or a magazine, or
lay in bed and read.  There is just something about holding the
book/magazine and reading it that way that is better to me than
reading it from the screen.  Maybe it's because I look at the screen
all day long anyway, but even sometimes at work if I'm reading an
article or a chunk of code, I'll print it out to read and sometimes
that's better, somehow, than looking at the screen.
Signature

Lauri in WA

panikkar - 26 Sep 2007 12:21 GMT
> Greetings to all ...  I need some help here, please.
>
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
> Phil
There is one thing in life for peace-Accept reality.She is your wife
for 71/2yeras and you could not change her.So accept her as she is.
Another   thing  to be carefull  is -not be aggressive, but assrtive.
Please understand that your wife has learned certain habits from her
family which cultivated them due to many reasons.Now, you cvannot
change themovernight.
Take her to a friends house where house is kept neat and clean.
2.There are 5S which Japanese follow.Send her for a traing programme
on 5S.
3.You also join the Art of living course basic as well as DSN
programme after that. You will see that life has become better.
Regards
AllYou! - 26 Sep 2007 13:14 GMT
> Greetings to all ...  I need some help here, please.
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> as 2-3 years ago. So many there is another basket full underneath
> the coffee table of these mags. IMHO, This is totally ridiculous.

There's *part* of the problem right there.  You're so convinced it's
rediculous that you don't seem to allow for any other possiblity.
This apparent unwillingness to see some issues from your wife's
perspective can't possibly help.

> The end table next to the couch has more magazines and other stuff
> that has been there for months!  She just loves to let stuff pile
> up.
> I have asked  - to no avail.

Asked, or demended?

> I prefer the kitchen table to be free of all items - instead she
> comes
> in piles her stuff on the table each and every day.  She leaves
> stuff
> on the kitchen table.  I was raised the kitchen table is for eating
> NOT storing stuff on it.

The key word there is that this is how YOU were raised.

> It's fun eating dinner with all of her stuff
> on the table. I hate it! I have asked her to clear off the table -
> to
> no avail.

Asked, or demended?

> She has a paper bag that she has kept near the kitchen table
> it's been there - for a year full of her school stuff.  I have tried
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> of coffee and various other items. I have asked her about it and she
> response with "That was mother's..." Her mother died in Nov, 1993.

Is your issue with this stuff that it's in your way, or simply that
she hangs onto it?

> In our study, there are books piled up on shelves - not so neatly. I
> have asked that WE re-organize the book shelves and evalute what
> books she wants to keep and to get rid of - to no avail. I cannot
> stand it!

Maybe she thinks that YOU will decide what books SHE should keep.

> Each time I EVEN think about pushing the issue, I think about the
> times she gets VERY ANGRY and starts yelling at me - throwing stuff
> and accusing me of "not respecting her stuff...".  I then think
> about
> the times we sleep in seperate bedrooms, not speaking for a week,
> eating seperate meals and so forth.

That's an entirely different issue.

> I feel I have "vented" enough and could  really could use some
> good advice, please.

First of all, It sounds as though she may need some professional help
in terms with coming to grips with her pack rat mentality.  I think in
many cases, there's something in a childhood that leads to this
apparent need to keep and save.

Secondly, you may want to rethink your position on this, both in terms
of compromise as to how much is kept, but also in terms of how hard
you push.  Ever had one of those bureau drawers that gets cocked, and
then stuck, as you're closing it?  It's true that a drawer won't close
unless you push it, and it's suppose to close if you push it, but in
that case, will it close if you push harder, or is it necessary to
back it off a little bit, and then take time and care to push it
gently closed?  And who says that it always has to close completely?
Phil - 26 Sep 2007 20:29 GMT
Hi ...  

That is a very provoking thought about a drawer closing and my
current "clutter" situation.  Thank you.


> Ever had one of those bureau drawers that gets cocked, and
>then stuck, as you're closing it?  It's true that a drawer won't close
>unless you push it, and it's suppose to close if you push it, but in
>that case, will it close if you push harder, or is it necessary to
>back it off a little bit, and then take time and care to push it
>gently closed?  And who says that it always has to close completely?

Phil
Vicki Robinson - 26 Sep 2007 13:19 GMT
In a previous article, Phil Tusa <ptusa@comcast.net> said:

>I prefer the kitchen table to be free of all items - instead she comes
>in piles her stuff on the table each and every day.  She leaves stuff
>on the kitchen table.  I was raised the kitchen table is for eating
>NOT storing stuff on it. It's fun eating dinner with all of her stuff
>on the table. I hate it! I have asked her to clear off the table - to
>no avail.

I tend to let things pile up, too.  Part of the reason is that, while I'm a
pretty smart person (I'm a college professor!) I become overwhelmed and
confused when I'm confronted by too many choices.  If I have a pile of stuff
on the table, I have to go through it one item by one item, deciding whether
to throw, donate or keep.  If I keep, then I have to decide what to do with
it.  I become more and more microfocused as the task goes on.  I end up
walking all over the house, with one pushpin to put away, one hairtie, one
pencil, one receipt.  One year when I decided to clear out and organize my
basement, I invited a very organized friend over to keep me from wigging out;
she didn't do the work, she brought some things of her own to do, but when I
started getting anxious and overwhelmed, she would help me refocus, or make me
take a tea break.

I know all the tricks, and if I can keep from getting overwhelmed they work.
But there are serious limits to the amount that I can do in one day, and I
know that it's anxiety that makes me turn my back on the growing piles of
junk.

Please don't assume that your wife is able to evaluate and toss as easily as
you are.  You'd think it should be easy, if tedious.  *I* think it should be
easy!  But it could be simply a recipe for confusion, anxiety and failure for
her.

Vicki
Signature

"I'm just a bad Christian.  A bad born-again Christian.  And certainly, like
the apostle Peter, I am capable of denying it, of presenting myself as a sort
of leftist liberation-theology enthusiast and maybe sort of a vaguely Jesusy
bon vivant.  But it's not true"  --Anne Lamott

Lauri - 26 Sep 2007 14:38 GMT
>In a previous article, Phil Tusa <ptusa@comcast.net> said:
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>walking all over the house, with one pushpin to put away, one hairtie, one
>pencil, one receipt.  

This is exactly how I am, too.  My brain just does not seem to
organize things the "normal" way and there are some things that I just
don't know what to do with.    I recently got a new little TV for the
bedroom and, if it's to ever be returned, it has to go in the original
packaging.  Where does that go?  Right now it's still in the middle of
the bedroom floor because I don't know.  When I am confronted by
clutter, I also see just a jumble of overwhelming, unrelated stuff
that makes no sense to me.  I start to clean it up and end up going to
the kitchen with a dirty teacup, but I can't put it in the dishwasher
because it's full of clean stuff.  So I start unloading that, leaving
the original clutter untouched in the other room.  I might find a book
in the kitchen, which will lead me to the bedroom bookcase, where I
notice that the bed needs to be made, so I do that.  Meanwhile, I'm
leaving a trail of half-finished tasks behind me!

I'm reading a pretty good book on the topic right now.   It's called,
"It's All Too Much!" by Peter Walsh.  He talks about the reasons *why*
we save stuff, particularly things like coffee that belongs to someone
who died in 1993.  Look at the reviews on Amazon.com and see if maybe
it would be a good book for you and your wife.

I also recommend that you visit alt.support.clutter.  I haven't
stopped by there for awhile, but I remember that the people there
seemed really nice and helpful.
Signature

Lauri in WA

Vicki Robinson - 26 Sep 2007 17:39 GMT
In a previous article, Lauri <laurinospam@nwidespam.netunspam> said:

>>I tend to let things pile up, too.  Part of the reason is that, while I'm a
>>pretty smart person (I'm a college professor!) I become overwhelmed and
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>notice that the bed needs to be made, so I do that.  Meanwhile, I'm
>leaving a trail of half-finished tasks behind me!

Exactly.  Exactly.  It just makes no *sense*. I can often throw out all the
crap that needs throwing out, but then I'm left with a pile of stuff that
seems to have no logical home.  I usually put away things that have homes; my
clothing, tools, books.  But paper defeats me big time, as do things like the
box you refer to.  Where is the "box place?"

So, Phil, understand that it might be more than just a refusal to change pack
rat ways.  It could be an inability to do so.

Vicki (not Vickie)
Signature

"I'm just a bad Christian.  A bad born-again Christian.  And certainly, like
the apostle Peter, I am capable of denying it, of presenting myself as a sort
of leftist liberation-theology enthusiast and maybe sort of a vaguely Jesusy
bon vivant.  But it's not true"  --Anne Lamott

Nina - 26 Sep 2007 17:56 GMT
>In a previous article, Lauri <laurinospam@nwidespam.netunspam> said:
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>clothing, tools, books.  But paper defeats me big time, as do things like the
>box you refer to.  Where is the "box place?"

The box place is the trash.  :-)   It really is, for most things like
that, because the cost of shipping the item back to the manufacturer
will exceed the value of the appliance in a VERY short period of time.
If things don't fail pretty immediately, they're not likely to within
the warranty period.

The alternate box place is the basement or garage, I think!

Seriously, though... I have the same problem, and the way that I've
(kind of) solved it is to get a couple of junk bins.  If I have to
actually think about what to do about the thing, I toss it in the junk
bin, and most of the time, when I go back to it in a couple of months,
I realize that the most appropriate and easiest place to put it is,
again, the trash.  This is especially true with paper... I sort of
have a 1 year box; if I don't have a home for it and don't need it in
a year, I toss it.
shinypenny - 26 Sep 2007 19:12 GMT
> Exactly.  Exactly.  It just makes no *sense*. I can often throw out all the
> crap that needs throwing out, but then I'm left with a pile of stuff that
> seems to have no logical home.  I usually put away things that have homes; my
> clothing, tools, books.  But paper defeats me big time, as do things like the
> box you refer to.  Where is the "box place?"

I have the most awesome system for paper, developed after years and
years of trial and error! This system has now been in place and
working quite well for nearly three years.

I got a large, tall file cabinet - it was being thrown away from an
office. It has four drawers. In the bottom drawer, I've stored my
professional files, which are bulky, and which I may need someday if I
ever switch jobs, but mostly I don't go in there very often.

In the next drawer is stuff that I need to hold on to, but very rarely
access - maybe once a year, max. This includes insurance policies,
passports and other important documents, deed to my car and the house,
medical records, cost-basis records (you need to hold on to those
forever - or until you sell the investment!), and archived tax folders
(one for each year). This drawer also includes a large folder for all
our appliance manuals, warranties, and receipts.

The third drawer contains monthly documents, in particular, my monthly
financial & investment statements and bank statements. It also
contains a large folder in which I stash tax information all year
long. At the end of the year, when I receive annual statements, I file
the annual statement in the yearly drawer, and dump out these files
and start fresh. Likewise, after taxes are done, I archive the current
year's folder and start a new one.

The fourth drawer is my most active drawer. I have it divided into
twelve folders, one for each month. Once I pay a bill, it goes in the
appropriate month's folder. When a full year comes around, I empty out
the folder and start fresh. That way, I'm only holding on to bills and
stuff like that for just one year. I figure a year is plenty.

This drawer also contains a large folder in the front for dumping
receipts we think we might want to save. When it gets too stuffed, we
clear it out.

We also have a folder for coupons and gift certificates, and a folder
for "social" stuff like invitations (because they often include
directions).

I go through the mail when it arrives, opening envelopes, tossing out
the junk, and stacking bills and statements. These go in a very small
pile near my computer,  I do my bills once or twice a month, then file
immediately. I *should* do my bills immediately - it would be simple
enough to do, and that's what DH does with his bills. But I tend to
let them build up first, and save that chore for the weekends. I
figure it's easier to file many things twice a month, rather than one
thing at a time every day!

jen
Emma Anne - 26 Sep 2007 20:57 GMT
> I have the most awesome system for paper, developed after years and
> years of trial and error! This system has now been in place and
> working quite well for nearly three years.

I love your system.  I might steal it.
Tai - 27 Sep 2007 23:56 GMT
>> Exactly.  Exactly.  It just makes no *sense*. I can often throw out
>> all the crap that needs throwing out, but then I'm left with a pile
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> for "social" stuff like invitations (because they often include
> directions).

I like your system, Jen, there's something very satisfying about its
orderliness, somehow!  Mine is similar but I keep things like passports,
birth certificates and any investment documents it would be a pain to have
to replace in a fireproof safe. I'm pretty sure I stole your idea about
putting all the warranties, manuals and receipts into one folder and I've
further organised them into a display book (with the clear plastic sleeves)
in reverse purchase date order, filling it from the back. (It keeps those
pesky small receipts in one spot, too!)

> I go through the mail when it arrives, opening envelopes, tossing out
> the junk, and stacking bills and statements. These go in a very small
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> figure it's easier to file many things twice a month, rather than one
> thing at a time every day!

Yeah, except that my "to be filed" folder has a tendency to end up several
inches thick and unless I file things as soon as I've done whatever needs to
be done with them!

I use internet banking for paying almost all our bills apart from the odd
cheque or credit card slip for school and child activities and rather than
bulk 'em up I enter most payments within a day or two of getting the account
and postdate the internet transaction to when it's due. In the next month I
have to start preparing the information our accountant will need to do our
taxes and while it's a boring chore it's a lot easier knowing where all the
papers are and that it won't take long to produce Quicken reports and a
handful of spreadsheets from data I've been entering over the past year.
Also, I take copies of every document that will be needed as it comes in, so
most of what I end up doing at this time is year is just collation.
Doug Anderson - 26 Sep 2007 15:55 GMT
> Greetings to all ...  I need some help here, please.
>
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> I feel I have "vented" enough and could  really could use some
> good advice, please.

Hi Phil,
       
I empathize, and I don't know if I have good advice for you, but I
have a similar situation in nature (though your version may be more
extreme).

I've been married for 25 years, so it has been necessary for me to
find a way to live with this.  Let me tell you a couple things that
don't work for us:

1) me trying to organize my wife, or set up an organizational
  structure.

2) setting house rules for what has to be kept uncluttered and to what
standard.

3) me sorting through her stuff, deciding what to do with things.

4) her buying storage furniture in an attempt to organize her way out
  of the problem.  (She perceives it as a problem too, but not one
  she wants my help with, and not one that, except for occasionally,
  becomes sufficiently urgent to rise to the top of her priority
  list.)

  (One of the ASM regulars, who shall remain nameless, but you know
  who you are, sent me a very funny picture of her cluttered closet
  with the book "Organizing from the inside out" peeking out from
  under some of the stuff.  That would be my wife's result too - my
  wife also owns that book, which has joined one of the piles of
  clutter!)

So here is what does work reasonable well for us.

There are two spaces in our house (neither nearly as big as a room)
where my wife and I have agreed that I can put her stuff, just in a
pile.  So when the clutter is bothering me, and it is her stuff (my
kids I can make clean up after themselves), I sweep up a pile of her
stuff, and put it in one of her two places.  These places are usually
heaping and unsightly, but they are contained.

And it takes me very little time to clear off the dining room table,
or the living room coffee table.  I don't have to sort,  I don't have
to think about where things go, what gets thrown away, and what
doesn't, etc.

Every once in a while, my wife can't find something, and she has to go
through one of her piles and trim things down.

I don't complain about my wife's lack of neatness.  In fact this
solution works well enough for us so that I don't even really feel
like complaining about it (most of the time).  And she doesn't
complain about having her clutter contained.
Emma Anne - 26 Sep 2007 16:39 GMT
I was going to write a long response but then DOug wrote it for me.  I
have a few comments to add below.

> > I feel I have "vented" enough and could  really could use some
> > good advice, please.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> find a way to live with this.  Let me tell you a couple things that
> don't work for us:

None of these things work at all for us.  DH keeps his stuff for
reasons.  He keeps stuff in his line of sight for reasons.  It just
annoys and insults him when I act like his reasons don't count.

> 1) me trying to organize my wife, or set up an organizational
>    structure.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> 4) her buying storage furniture in an attempt to organize her way out
>    of the problem.

These are called "junk bunkers."  :-)

>  (She perceives it as a problem too, but not one
>    she wants my help with, and not one that, except for occasionally,
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> stuff, and put it in one of her two places.  These places are usually
> heaping and unsightly, but they are contained.

DH does have an entire room.  Unfortunately it gets full.  But I have
some success with persuading him to get rid of some of the stuff in the
room or to let me do it.  Perhaps he has had enough time to separate
emotionally from it?

> And it takes me very little time to clear off the dining room table,
> or the living room coffee table.  I don't have to sort,  I don't have
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> like complaining about it (most of the time).  And she doesn't
> complain about having her clutter contained.

You do a bit better than we do.  It does bother DH that I pile up his
stuff and move it.  He wants it to (a) stay where he put it so it is
right there for him and (b) not build up and get out of control.  He
knows these two things are contradictory but he isn't happy about it!  I
also feel annoyed because not only do I have to do what feels like his
job, I don't appreciation for it, but rather irritation.

On the other hand, this is probably the most vexing problem in our
marriage, and we have made progress in coming to terms with it.
Occasional annoyance is so much better than constant frustration.
Doug Anderson - 26 Sep 2007 18:41 GMT
> I was going to write a long response but then DOug wrote it for me.  I
> have a few comments to add below.
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> These are called "junk bunkers."  :-)

In our house they are often part of the junk!

> >  (She perceives it as a problem too, but not one
> >    she wants my help with, and not one that, except for occasionally,
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> marriage, and we have made progress in coming to terms with it.
> Occasional annoyance is so much better than constant frustration.

I suspect we have a milder version of this problem than you and Mr
Anne have.

But there are several things that help us some that may or may not be
applicable in another household.  It isn't like I clear up her stuff
and dump it all the time.  For example, I do the kitchen table once or
twice a day, but often just move things to another kitchen surface,
until the kitchen overall is too cluttered.

And less busy parts of the house often accumulate clutter for weeks
before I start to feel impinged upon enough to do a sweep through
those rooms, so she can't make a very plausible case that this is
urgent, and that is why she left it in sight.

Also, her designated clutter storage areas _aren't_ out of sight
(though it is hard to pick out individual important items by sight).

And then, unlike the OP, I'm the magazine subscriber.  (I'm down to
two right now, sadly.  I had to let my subscription to The Economist
lapse since I haven't really had time to read it since last spring.
I'm very sad about that, but I'm trying to be realistic.)  But I do
let magazines pile up.  But then I really do go through them (although
there are some that hang around for 6 months or longer because they
contain a long article I _want_ to read, but haven't yet been in the
mood for).
Emma Anne - 26 Sep 2007 20:57 GMT
> I suspect we have a milder version of this problem than you and Mr
> Anne have.

Yes, Mr. Anne and I are both a bit irrational on the subject.

Magazines, let's see, I get The New Yorker, The Nation, and Consumer
Reports. DH reads the New Yorkers and gets an alumni magazine and
something with hockey players on the cover.  DOD gets Cosmo Girl.  DYD
gets some nature magazine.  But we have a place for those, so it's a
tidy pile on a designated shelf and it doesn't bug me.  It is, of
course, me who eventually gets rid of the ancient issues, but not very
often.
Doug Anderson - 27 Sep 2007 03:38 GMT
> > I suspect we have a milder version of this problem than you and Mr
> > Anne have.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Magazines, let's see, I get The New Yorker, The Nation, and Consumer
> Reports.

I'll see you that New Yorker, and we get the NYT Book Review (which is
a bit like dessert without dinner since we don't get the Sunday NYT),
and we get our friend's discared CR.  Then until recently I would have
had to raise you with The Economist (an interesting and way too long
weekly).

Luckily for me, I feel no desire to actually _read_ CR

> something with hockey players on the cover.  DOD gets Cosmo Girl.  DYD
> gets some nature magazine.

Monthlies I can handle.  It is all these weeklies I want to read that
can threaten to swamp me!
Grace - 27 Sep 2007 17:09 GMT
> And then, unlike the OP, I'm the magazine subscriber.  (I'm down to
> two right now, sadly.  I had to let my subscription to The Economist
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> contain a long article I _want_ to read, but haven't yet been in the
> mood for

That really surprises me, Doug.  Being a subscriber was one of the
little bonds i had with you.  Wouldnt you have rather given up some of
the time you spend on the ngs?  )

Ive cut way back since descovering the order it on line pick it up at
the circulation desk feature of my local library.  Currently dashing
thru a Christopher Hutchins festival myself.

Grace
Tai - 28 Sep 2007 00:02 GMT
>> And then, unlike the OP, I'm the magazine subscriber.  (I'm down to
>> two right now, sadly.  I had to let my subscription to The Economist
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> the circulation desk feature of my local library.  Currently dashing
> thru a Christopher Hutchins festival myself.

I can't have magazine or newspaper subscriptions because they end up owning
me and keeping up with reading them turns into a joyless madatory chore to
be fitted into my life rather than a pleasure! So I borrow a small number of
the publications I enjoy from the library and I read newspapers in cafes
over a cup of coffee, as a sort of solitary pleasure in the self-care
category.
Lauri - 28 Sep 2007 02:33 GMT
>I can't have magazine or newspaper subscriptions because they end up owning
>me and keeping up with reading them turns into a joyless madatory chore to
>be fitted into my life rather than a pleasure! So I borrow a small number of
>the publications I enjoy from the library and I read newspapers in cafes
>over a cup of coffee, as a sort of solitary pleasure in the self-care
>category.

That's actually a really good idea, and a nice solution to my problem
of feeling like I'm being a bad person if I throw away a thick, glossy
magazine.  I might give this a try!
Signature

Lauri in WA

shinypenny - 28 Sep 2007 04:53 GMT
> That's actually a really good idea, and a nice solution to my problem
> of feeling like I'm being a bad person if I throw away a thick, glossy
> magazine.  I might give this a try!

Once the magazine enters your house, with a gummy label featuring your
name and address, the damage is already done, LOL!

Really, I've been trying to rid our house of all subscriptions
completely - but the irony is that today of all days, a new fresh copy
of Oprah magazine with my name on it arrived! Apparently DH used up
his coca-cola points awhile back, to get me a subscription for my bday
last month, and it's only just arrived!! I know it's the thought that
counts but...

Making matters worse, it happens to be an issue I bought and read a
few weeks ago on a plane trip. What to do???

jen
Grace - 28 Sep 2007 06:50 GMT
Apparently DH used up
> his coca-cola points awhile back, to get me a subscription for my bday
> last month, and it's only just arrived!! I know it's the thought that
> counts but...
>
> Making matters worse, it happens to be an issue I bought and read a
> few weeks ago on a plane trip. What to do???

Sit back and let him pamper you?  Glad to see the honeymoon's not
over.  -)

Grace
Doug Anderson - 28 Sep 2007 04:27 GMT
> > And then, unlike the OP, I'm the magazine subscriber.  (I'm down to
> > two right now, sadly.  I had to let my subscription to The Economist
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> little bonds i had with you.  Wouldnt you have rather given up some of
> the time you spend on the ngs?  )

Well, the only ng I spend much time on is this one.  And I'd estimate
it as about 1/5 of the amount of time that the Economist requires (and less
concentration!)

But I do miss reading it, except I haven't time to read it!
Grace - 28 Sep 2007 06:55 GMT
On Sep 27, 8:27 pm, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovet...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Well, the only ng I spend much time on is this one.  And I'd estimate
> it as about 1/5 of the amount of time that the Economist requires (and less
> concentration!)

I just found that ngs were bringing out a side of me i didn't like,
thus the break.

> But I do miss reading it, except I haven't time to read it!

We both have geopolitical areas of high, moderate and almost
nonexistant interests and read accordingly so neither of us reads
every word of every issue.  We are both pretty fond of the LA World
Affairs Council and Im a devoute devotee of the Asia Society here so
we like to stay up to date on places of our own special intersts.

So you actually read the whole thing?

Grace
Doug Anderson - 28 Sep 2007 07:17 GMT
> On Sep 27, 8:27 pm, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovet...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> So you actually read the whole thing?

Oh, no.  Never.

But still,  I found I would spend at least 2 hours with an issue
before I'd read everything I wanted to - sometimes quite a bit longer!
This, in spite of the fact that I read fairly fast.
Grace - 28 Sep 2007 09:37 GMT
On Sep 27, 11:17 pm, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovet...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Oh, no.  Never.
>
> But still,  I found I would spend at least 2 hours with an issue
> before I'd read everything I wanted to - sometimes quite a bit longer!
> This, in spite of the fact that I read fairly fast

It takes me much, much longer than that!!  Even with relatively mild
dyslexia I can only read about 250 wpm, fortunately with high
comprehension and retension.  with the exception of the featured
articles, most  things are relatively short.  We also subscribe to
Foreign Affairs and Le monde Diplmatique.

In my fantasy Road Less Travelled I would have liked to have worked
for the Asian Development Bank or the Kuwait fund for Arab Economic
Development....way pre-911, or at least have had a long term affair
with Peter Jennings but marriage and motherhood and all that....-).

Still, it's been an intersting life from afar.

Grace
Caitriona Mac Fhiodhbhuidhe - 28 Sep 2007 13:41 GMT
On Sep 28, 1:17 am, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovet...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > On Sep 27, 8:27 pm, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovet...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> before I'd read everything I wanted to - sometimes quite a bit longer!
> This, in spite of the fact that I read fairly fast.- Hide quoted text -

Seems that perhaps you're more organized in your magazine reading
habits than I am.  I flip through, find the most interesting articles
first and read them.  Then a few days later, I flip through to see
what else is in the magazine.  Then a week or two later, I may go back
to the most informative of the articles I read and re-read them.

Kitten
Grace - 29 Sep 2007 21:48 GMT
On Sep 28, 5:41 am, Caitriona Mac Fhiodhbhuidhe
<st_brigids_gate_f...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Seems that perhaps you're more organized in your magazine reading
> habits than I am.  I flip through, find the most interesting articles
> first and read them.  Then a few days later, I flip through to see
> what else is in the magazine.  Then a week or two later, I may go back
> to the most informative of the articles I read and re-read them.

I have relatively mild dyslexia so I can only read about 250 wpm, but
with good comprehension and retension.  I like magazines because the
articles are relatively short.  i actually pickup quite a bit by
watching a lot of PBS, news programs and things on TV. and movies.
Its sort of amazing whats available out there if your looking for it.

Grace
not so closeted dyslexic
Grace - 29 Sep 2007 21:52 GMT
 i actually pickup quite a bit by
> watching a lot of PBS, news programs and things on TV. and movies.
> Its sort of amazing whats available out there if your looking for it.
>
> Grace
> not so closeted dyslexic

Oh....I meant to add lectures and books on tape.  lots of stuff at the
library.  i think  much of it is actually intended for the blind.

Grace
Bill in Co. - 29 Sep 2007 22:06 GMT
>   i actually pickup quite a bit by
>> watching a lot of PBS, news programs and things on TV. and movies.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Grace

And Book TV, on CSPAN.      Very interesting - and informative (along with a
lot of stuff on CSPAN, for that matter).
Tai - 28 Sep 2007 00:25 GMT
[...]

> It does bother DH that I pile up his
> stuff and move it.  He wants it to (a) stay where he put it so it is
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> marriage, and we have made progress in coming to terms with it.
> Occasional annoyance is so much better than constant frustration.

I've been thinking about the on display vs tidied away aspects of hoarding
(or saving!) I think of my husband and I as moderate hoarders because
there's no denying we have far too much stuff. It's easier to put something
out of sight than to think about whether we should keep it, sell or give it
away or junk it and we've never been good at going through that process.
Anyway, if the object is not broken it seems wasteful not to keep it!

But, emotionally, I have to have relatively clean and tidy surroundings to
be comfortable and as soon as I feel there's too much stuff on display I
start to itch and I have put the clutter out of sight. It's still there,
though, it's just hidden! This becomes a problem for me when there is simply
no more room to squirrel away more stuff and I'm faced with an enormous and
hugely tedious job to clear it all out. Which I have at the moment with our
bedroom closet and our youngest son's bedroom and the laundry cupboards...
and the kitchen cupboards and... well, it's all starting to feel oppressive.

So it seems to me that people like your husband and possibly the OP's wife
often differ from a lot of us only by a small degree but it's just that it's
a very visible difference!

One of my friends loves decluttering other people's houses and I'm sure she
could make a living at creating serene, pure spaces for us all!
Emma Anne - 28 Sep 2007 03:24 GMT
> This becomes a problem for me when there is simply
> no more room to squirrel away more stuff and I'm faced with an enormous and
> hugely tedious job to clear it all out.

Argh, yes.  If I had more available storage space, I would fill it up
before sorting through stuff too.  It's not like I'm a simple living
avatar or anything!
Tai - 28 Sep 2007 03:58 GMT
>> This becomes a problem for me when there is simply
>> no more room to squirrel away more stuff and I'm faced with an
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> before sorting through stuff too.  It's not like I'm a simple living
> avatar or anything!

You know, I really do think I could have gone in the direction!  The choice
not to was made by accident when we decided to have children. I learned I
could tolerate far more mess than I thought I could...

...along with several other interesting things such as how easy it is to nag
and that I _was_ listening to my mother all those years after all. Well, I
must have been, I've been quoting her words back to my children for years!

But I do quietly yearn for minimalist surroundings, it's just that the
energy I'd need to achieve then maintain that blissful state is more than I
could find within me at this point in my life. So, instead, I'll settle for
cleaning out a few cupboards to celebrate the arrival of Spring and call it
done for now.
shinypenny - 28 Sep 2007 05:01 GMT
> >> This becomes a problem for me when there is simply
> >> no more room to squirrel away more stuff and I'm faced with an
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> cleaning out a few cupboards to celebrate the arrival of Spring and call it
> done for now.

I purposely bought a small house with 100 year old teeny tiny closets,
to force myself to be more minimalist. Flash forward 3-4 years, and
those closets are groaning and I'm researching things like beds that
have drawer platforms for extra storage (see Pottery Barn!).

Actually this summer's home exchange was a great thing for us, because
it did force me to look at the house from someone else's perspective.
I did make good headway on things like the linen closet - paring
towels and sheet sets down so the shelves weren't toppling over. And
my collection of clothes: I sorted everything, gave away a lot, and
organized the nonseasonal stuff into bins to be stored away, while
making enough room in my closet for the other family to hang their
stuff. I went through the kitchen in particular to make it more
intuitive, and clean out the mismatched tupperware. And yes! I even
took out the key manuals for our tricker-to-use appliances and put
them in a binder, along with other helpful household information!!

Unfortunately, the exchange experience got me very spoiled because for
the very first time I hired housecleaners to come in - a few days
before we left, and the day the other family moved out, so the house
was clean with fresh sheets when we landed. That was about a month
ago, and I've been quite lazy about cleaning since!! I keep
thinking... heck... I could just pick up the phone and call the
cleaners back... sigh...

jen
Grace - 28 Sep 2007 07:15 GMT
> I purposely bought a small house with 100 year old teeny tiny closets,
> to force myself to be more minimalist. Flash forward 3-4 years, and
> those closets are groaning and I'm researching things like beds that
> have drawer platforms for extra storage (see Pottery Barn!).

I downsized considerably when my husband died and the boys went off to
school.  My current house is a very charming California bungalow (not
a Craft'sman.)  The bathrooms are small and the closets are incredibly
small and I'm a clothes horse.  Thus my lilfetime membership in
alt.recovery.clutter.  Being and staying organized is a must.

Grace
Caitriona Mac Fhiodhbhuidhe - 28 Sep 2007 13:40 GMT
> > I purposely bought a small house with 100 year old teeny tiny closets,
> > to force myself to be more minimalist. Flash forward 3-4 years, and
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> small and I'm a clothes horse.  Thus my lilfetime membership in
> alt.recovery.clutter.  Being and staying organized is a must.

I don't have lots of clothes, so small closets wouldn't be a problem
for me.  But I'd LOVE to have a good-sized bathroom.

Kitten
Vickie - 28 Sep 2007 18:24 GMT
On Sep 28, 5:40 am, Caitriona Mac Fhiodhbhuidhe
<st_brigids_gate_f...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > I purposely bought a small house with 100 year old teeny tiny closets,
> > > to force myself to be more minimalist. Flash forward 3-4 years, and
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Kitten

I think we are going to be moving in the next year.  That is almost
top on my list of priorities.
HUGE BATHROOM.
Vickie
Caitriona Mac Fhiodhbhuidhe - 28 Sep 2007 18:48 GMT
> On Sep 28, 5:40 am, Caitriona Mac Fhiodhbhuidhe
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> top on my list of priorities.
> HUGE BATHROOM.

With an antique clawfoot tub you can *really* soak in?

Kitten, who hates modern teeny-tiny squared-off wanna-be bathtubs
Vickie - 28 Sep 2007 18:55 GMT
On Sep 28, 10:48 am, Caitriona Mac Fhiodhbhuidhe
<st_brigids_gate_f...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > On Sep 28, 5:40 am, Caitriona Mac Fhiodhbhuidhe
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Yeah, exactly.  Hate those.

Or maybe one of those super-sized for two, with jets, kind.  Sweet!

Vickie
Emma Anne - 28 Sep 2007 19:06 GMT
> With an antique clawfoot tub you can *really* soak in?

I have one.  I only take a bath once a week*, since it holds about a
thousand gallons.

* showers the rest of the time in case anyone is about to mock my
bathing habits.
Doug Anderson - 28 Sep 2007 21:24 GMT
> > With an antique clawfoot tub you can *really* soak in?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> * showers the rest of the time in case anyone is about to mock my
> bathing habits.

Darn.  Just whan someone hands you a good straight line...
Emma Anne - 30 Sep 2007 18:06 GMT
> > > With an antique clawfoot tub you can *really* soak in?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Darn.  Just whan someone hands you a good straight line...

Sorry.  That was kind of mean of me.
Grace - 29 Sep 2007 21:42 GMT
On Sep 28, 10:48 am, Caitriona Mac Fhiodhbhuidhe
<st_brigids_gate_f...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> With an antique clawfoot tub you can *really* soak in?

Yup, the good news of a house built in 1929 is the original bathroom
and tub.  the bad news is the original kitchen!  Luckily the second
bathroom was redone in 1979, about 10 years before  i bought it.

Best news....2 bathrooms....2 people.  Ive got mine all mine!

Grace
Phil - 26 Sep 2007 20:39 GMT
Hi Doug  ... I had no idea I would get so many supportive responses!

Thank you very much for your helpful insight!  After 25 years, I would
imagine you have the experience of dealing with something similar to
what I have delt with for the past 7 1/2 years.  

>I empathize, and I don't know if I have good advice for you, but I
>have a similar situation in nature (though your version may be more
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>1) me trying to organize my wife, or set up an organizational
>   structure.

>2) setting house rules for what has to be kept uncluttered and to what
>standard.

>3) me sorting through her stuff, deciding what to do with things.

>4) her buying storage furniture in an attempt to organize her way out
>   of the problem.  (She perceives it as a problem too, but not one
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>   wife also owns that book, which has joined one of the piles of
>   clutter!)

>So here is what does work reasonable well for us.
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>like complaining about it (most of the time).  And she doesn't
>complain about having her clutter contained.
Banty - 27 Sep 2007 17:14 GMT
>Hi Doug  ... I had no idea I would get so many supportive responses!
>
>Thank you very much for your helpful insight!  After 25 years, I would
>imagine you have the experience of dealing with something similar to
>what I have delt with for the past 7 1/2 years.  

Doug's idea is a good one.  And workable.  Workable in that both people win
something.  The unorganized person isn't pressed; the person who needs a more
uncluttered environment gets at least some of that.

Beware of falling into the trap of thinking a clutter-person is less caring or
less hardworking or any of that.  (By the same token, messy people need to
beware of falling into the trap of thinking they're more easygoing and laid
back, and have their priorities more aligned with immediate human needs.)

Personally, I'm kinda inpbetween.  But I find it easier to clean up for a person
who wants neater than I would if I were living alone, then to live with a person
who leaves more messes than I do.  (Even as many messes as I do!).  So I tend to
your side of things.

I don't leave messes, but I'm what someone I know described as a "pile person".
I put things in piles so that they're somewhat organized, but I never really get
back to them.  I do have corners of my house with piles in them.  Sometimes
because they're in that "misc" category I'm not sure what to do with that
someone else in this thread described, sometimes simply because I dont' get back
to the piles.

But, in living with someone, I find myself making more piles, and I've figured
out why.  I'm not saying this is true for your situation, just something to
consider:

Say we both get home from work, and I start going through some mail for me.  He
says "um, when is dinner", and I feel rushed and a bit guilty, yes it's my night
to fix dinner.  So, instead of taking the fifteen minutes right there and then
to really dispose of all the mail, I put it down (you guessed it; in a pile..)
and go to making dinner.  After dinner, you would think that I should up and go
right back to the mail pile and finish it, but there's usually something *else*
going on "hon, isn't John Stewart hilarious tonight - what are you doing over
there by the table?", and also I have a little trouble getting back into any
task once I leave it. Maybe it's a touch of ADD  :)   I'm much better off
finishing it after I start it.  But often there's someone who is anxious for me
to leave it temporarily to move on to another task or activity.  *They* might
find it easy to then go back later in the evening to finish something, but I
have a bit of a hard time with it.

Think if maybe you unintentionally derail small efforts at organization (and
organization *is* a matter of many small efforts).

Cheers,
Banty
Emma Anne - 27 Sep 2007 17:55 GMT
> Think if maybe you unintentionally derail small efforts at organization (and
> organization *is* a matter of many small efforts).

Interesting idea.  I am going to think about this.
A Concerned Citizen@concernedcitizen.com - 27 Sep 2007 13:11 GMT
> Greetings to all ...  I need some help here, please.
>
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
> Phil

I have a bias.  I believe a perfect marriage is living 6 months in her
house and 6 months in your house.

I am a pack-rat of the worst kind.  I have stuff as far back as grade 5.
I am much closer to 100 than I am to 5 years of age!

In any contract or relationship there is one rule.  Don't sweat the
small stuff.

Find a solution.  You are worrying about the space and what is in it.
Find a room, build a room, convert a room - no matter how small - call
it yours, put a lock on it, allow her it inspect it anytime she wants,
but prohibit her from touching anything, removing anything or adding
anything to that room.  It is your room with a big tv, beer fridge, poor
table, your treasures.  You will be happy.  Maybe a bit lonely at times
as perfection can be boring.  

As an aside, I grew up in a trailer with my parents and my brother.  My
mother said to me probably many times, "I only have one drawer in the
trailer (250 sq. ft.) where I keep my bra and panties.  Please, stop
putting stuff in my drawer.  My brother had one box for putting his
stuff in and he would say similar remarks with respect to his toys.  I
won't comment on how many drawers or boxes I had.  

You cannot change people.  Your wife directly or indirectly has tried to
change you and it hasn't worked!  

My ex used pile my stuff that I had left in any given room into a pile
in the middle of the room with a request that I do something with it.  I
usually rearranged it so it could remain not far from where it was
originally.  Incidently, that wasn't remotely related to the separation.
Phil - 29 Sep 2007 02:11 GMT
I want to thank everyone who contributed to my "venting", thanks!

-
Phil  

>Greetings to all ...  I need some help here, please.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>books she wants to keep and to get rid of - to no avail. I cannot
>stand it!
Doug Anderson - 29 Sep 2007 06:34 GMT
> I want to thank everyone who contributed to my "venting", thanks!

Speaking for myself, you are quite welcome.

As this is an issue that affects (in some way or another) many of us,
it would be interesting to hear any further adventures on this topic!