Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Marriage / Marriage / February 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What to do when the shooting starts

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Emma Anne - 21 Feb 2008 19:56 GMT
Interesting thread on that here:

http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/009689.html

Everything Jim Macdonald writes on survival, first aid, disaster
preparation, etc. is well worth reading.

Interesting bits from Jim and various commenters:

"Now some advice: If you hear gunshots in a public place and they're
nearby, seek cover and concealment. Stay there until uniformed police
officers tell you it's safe to move. If they're distant, get moving in
the opposite direction, provided you can do so safely.
Oh, yes: If someone you don't know calls you by name, make yourself one
with the pavement.
Definitions:
Cover: something that bullets won't penetrate. Solid walls, sandbags,
engine blocks.
Concealment: Bullets will go through them, but they hide you from view.
Interior walls, bushes, auto doors."

"If you have to move under fire, it's up, three running steps, and drop
to the next good cover. You're not going deep for a pass into the
endzone. Three is the magic number. Four is pushing it. Five is straight
out. If you're up and someone's shooting towards your vicinity (but not
waiting for you to jack in the box into your next move), by the count of
three, you'll drop and hear bullets whiz over your head. You might make
four if your lucky. Five voids all warranties.
Oh, and before you get up, figure out where you're going to go to next.
Then start running and start counting.
The cadence in your head will be: up, one, two, three, drop. ... up,
one, two, three, drop. If you get into a groove, you'll start looking
ahead to the second point of cover while you're up and running to your
first."

"According to my recent research, the FBI's current recommendation in
school shootings is *against* shelter-in-place, FWIW.
The word from the Bureau these days is get the hell out, any way you
can. They call them "sitting ducks" for a reason."

"Shartly after the Virginia Tech shootings, I ran across a thread where
people were posting ideas for what to do if you were in such a
situation. For example, it turned out that one professor had barricaded
the door when he heard the shots— he and his students survived simply
because the shooter turned to easier targets. A couple of ideas that
came out of the thread were:
1) Arm yourself with whatever you can. Even a text book can be a
missile.
2) Shooters tend to display some of the automatic assumptions that
everyone makes— if you stand in front of the door, he may shoot through
the door, but if you stand next to the door, he probably won't shoot
through the wall. (Weird little data point discussion surrounding that
one.)
3. Shooters lead with the gun— stand by the door, armed with a
broomstick, and the moment the gun comes through, whack it down.
IOW, if you are in a trapped situation where flight is not applicable,
start thinking fight because it's your best chance. Flight is usually
the better option."

Since I was at one point a female engineering student, my thinking on
the subject was formed when that guy in Canada went on the rampage in
the engineering school.  People did hide behind and under desks.  This
guy walked around and killed all the women he found.  So I am of the
"don't be a sitting duck" persuasion.  I'd try to run or fight.  But you
can only guess and play the odds, because you don't know what your
shooter will do.  Final word on the subject:

"It's a hideous tactical situation. You don't know anything. The person
shooting could be trying to make a ruckus and get killed (suicide by
cop), in which case he'll be more likely to shoot at random than aiming
carefully at people; or he could be trying to kill as many people as
possible, in which case he'll shoot anybody he sees; or he could be
after one or a few specific people, in which case he'll shoot them plus
probably anybody who seems like a threat.
In addition to specific aimed shots, there's the question of where the
random shots and the misses go.
"Cover" is always best, since it protects you in both cases.
"Concealment" generally prevents his aiming shots at you, but does
nothing against the random shots and misses.
Standing behind a pillar can be better than lying on the floor, in that
less of you is visible especially from medium to far distances.
Looking out from your cover obviously renders your eye (and hence much
of your head) vulnerable, plus it's movement (which draws the eye). Not
knowing what's going on can be fatal. As I say, it's a really horrid
tactical situation.
Getting out has a lot to recommend it."
Doug Anderson - 21 Feb 2008 20:01 GMT
> Even a text book can be a
> missile.

Especially those self-guided ones.
Emma Anne - 21 Feb 2008 22:24 GMT
> > Even a text book can be a
> > missile.
>
> Especially those self-guided ones.

Heh.
Vickie - 21 Feb 2008 22:23 GMT
> Interesting thread on that here:
>
[quoted text clipped - 82 lines]
> tactical situation.
> Getting out has a lot to recommend it."

I like this info.  And by having common sense I am not looking around
my doors figuring someone is out to shoot me by having read it.

Of course this info is only about having to take care of you and you
only.
When in charge of a group of people, especially small children, I
wonder if "get the hell out" makes sense.  I mean a lot of times you
can tell your kids to do this or that, but when agitated or frightened
you might get them half way "out" but then they turn and run the wrong
way, bring more notice to themselves, or stop, drop, and cry right
there.

Just my thoughts.

Vickie
ML. - 22 Feb 2008 00:54 GMT
>I like this info.  And by having common sense I am not looking around
>my doors figuring someone is out to shoot me by having read it.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Vickie

That original post was triggering for me (PTSD) but i wanted to read it.
(dumb, huh?)  Every school shooting is triggering now.  I can't hide from it.
Strange, I had just submitted my March column which referred to this subject a
day or two before this latest shooting.  Following my light-hearted February
column, this one was more serious. Probably the hardest one to right so far.
Almost felt I should retract it, but then why.  

Whatever you plan on, hard to know what one would actually do in the real
thing.   All my son could do was instinctively flee and hide.  Turned out to
be the right move, for him.
Vickie - 22 Feb 2008 01:09 GMT
> In article <81467cd3-5834-4e93-aecd-70fbbb99e...@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, Vickie <lilliputianbizz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> >Vickie

> That original post was triggering for me (PTSD) but i wanted to read it.
>  (dumb, huh?)  Every school shooting is triggering now.  I can't hide from it.
> Strange, I had just submitted my March column which referred to this subject a
> day or two before this latest shooting.  Following my light-hearted February
> column, this one was more serious. Probably the hardest one to right so far.
> Almost felt I should retract it, but then why.  

Gosh, I am so sorry.  It must be awful.  Maybe it will get easier with
time?

> Whatever you plan on, hard to know what one would actually do in the real
> thing.   All my son could do was instinctively flee and hide.  Turned out to
> be the right move, for him.

Thank God for that.
It is true, you never know what you would do in the real thing.
I think it is good to think about it, have some kind of plan.  It
gives you a feeling of some kind of control over an uncontrollable
situation.  Whether it turns out by the book or not.

Vickie
EB - 22 Feb 2008 13:18 GMT
> In article <81467cd3-5834-4e93-aecd-70fbbb99e...@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, Vickie <lilliputianbizz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Been my experience from my childhood days, to duck and cover. Living
in inner city Baltimore, I can remember
many of nights of drive-by shootings or gangbangers just going crazy.
Hit the ground first, look where the shooter is, then attempt to hide.
Also from experience, shooter's tend to go for upright running
targets. If, in a crowd situation and you are in the open, hit the
ground and stay still. Messed up as it seems, the shooter tend to go
after the "live running targets", than the one laying on the ground
playing dead.

I agree also about the corner situation. Back against the wall,
cornered and no where to run, you might as well go down fighting.
Strange as it may seem, the shooter doesn't expect fighters. Not
saying always go on the attack, only when its the last resort and
there is absolutely no chance of escape.

EB
kato - 22 Feb 2008 16:36 GMT
> That original post was triggering for me (PTSD) but i wanted to read it.
>  (dumb, huh?)

Not dumb inky, I read it too.
shinypenny - 22 Feb 2008 17:17 GMT
> In article <81467cd3-5834-4e93-aecd-70fbbb99e...@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, Vickie <lilliputianbizz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> thing.   All my son could do was instinctively flee and hide.  Turned out to
> be the right move, for him.-

ML, can I read your column? If you don't want to post the link to it
here, my email address works.

jen
ML. - 23 Feb 2008 08:13 GMT
>> In article <81467cd3-5834-4e93-aecd-70fbbb99e...@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.=
>com>, Vickie <lilliputianbizz...@gmail.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>ML, can I read your column? If you don't want to post the link to it
>here, my email address works.

sure.  I will email the link, don't want to be like those people that annoy
people by posting their blog addresses. :-)
zorra - 23 Feb 2008 19:33 GMT
> In article
> <00dcc593-c8b5-4cd8-8b23-46a89bf3b8e4@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
> annoy
> people by posting their blog addresses. :-)

But, ML, in this case you are a familiar and welcome presence, and there are
quite a few people who would be interested in reading the article, many who are
too shy to ask.  So if you are *willing* to post the link, it would be nice.
:-)

Zorra
ML. - 24 Feb 2008 07:17 GMT
>> In article
>> <00dcc593-c8b5-4cd8-8b23-46a89bf3b8e4@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>too shy to ask.  So if you are *willing* to post the link, it would be nice.
>:-)

thanks.

It's at menstuff dot org
The column "A Mother's Love"
zorra - 24 Feb 2008 19:18 GMT
>>> In article
>>> <00dcc593-c8b5-4cd8-8b23-46a89bf3b8e4@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
> It's at menstuff dot org
> The column "A Mother's Love"

Thanks!  :-)

Zorra
Saulgoode - 24 Feb 2008 01:32 GMT
> Interesting thread on that here:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Interesting bits from Jim and various commenters:

<xxx>

> "It's a hideous tactical situation. You don't know anything. The person
> shooting could be trying to make a ruckus and get killed (suicide by
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> tactical situation.
> Getting out has a lot to recommend it."

Anyone who's been in an all-out cow-patty war knows these things.

Frankly, a tactic I didn't see in your article was that of rabbitting
(that's what I call it). When everybody else runs in a crowd, you duck low.
I remember doing this once behind the gate. Full-dark night, cow-patties
flying, and we were all tucked behind this big aluminum gate that led out to
the pasture. Five boys took off running and I tucked and sat. The chase went
by me toward the haybarn, and I took out the shooter from behind.

BB-gun wars are a close second, followed by Indian Wars, which is strictly
hand-to-hand combat. After that comes knife fights in the Hooters parking
lot, and protective tennis racquets on Halloween night.

Anyway, you gotta know what you're made of before you're in that situation.
I know me, and I know I'd've thrown something at the guy, then rushed him --
if you've ever had an armadillo rush you in the woods at night, you ~know~
how terrifying it is to see something you're trying to kill take a suicidal
bum-rush at you, and just how hard it is to hold that pistol steady (you
actually have a good chance of getting your hands on the guy.)

My old man beat the sh.t of a guy who broke into his house. Die fighting.

- Saul
Emma Anne - 24 Feb 2008 16:27 GMT
> Anyone who's been in an all-out cow-patty war knows these things.

The main thing I learned from my paint gun war days is that most people
can't shoot very straight if you are moving.  If you are a sitting duck,
on the other hand . . .
Doug Laidlaw - 24 Feb 2008 05:23 GMT
> Interesting thread on that here:
>
[quoted text clipped - 82 lines]
> tactical situation.
> Getting out has a lot to recommend it."

I thought that you were going to write about marital shoot-outs.  They are
becoming all the fashion here.  One chap pursued his ex-gf from a nightclub
and shot her (and a bystander who tried to intervene) dead in the middle of
a major city intersection.

Doug.
dickliquor@hotmail.com - 26 Feb 2008 03:34 GMT
>"Now some advice: If you hear gunshots in a public place and they're
>nearby, seek cover and concealment. Stay there until uniformed police
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Concealment: Bullets will go through them, but they hide you from view.
>Interior walls, bushes, auto doors."

While others are doing the duck and cover, I'll be shooting the
shooter.  These days I dont go anywhere in public without a loaded
gun.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.