Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Marriage / Marriage / June 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I'm having an affair.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Pumpkins - 24 Jun 2008 02:49 GMT
It all started online, like many affairs do these days. We met while
participating in a locally based group. And it was one of those things,
something clicked and after a month or two from the time we first
noticed each other, we began emailing each other. It progressed rapidly
after that, within another month, we met.

The first meeting, we just talked. The second meeting, we kissed. We
have had other meetings since then, but we have never progressed beyond
kissing. I'm not going to pretend that somehow that makes it right,
because I know it doesn't.

The thing is, I can't really say what it is that compels me to continue
with the affair. I mean beyond the obvious, which is that I feel as if I
have found my lifemate, and we have an incredibly good chemistry and
understanding of each other. But when I ask myself if I am willing to
sacrifice my marriage to this affair, the answer has very honestly been no.

I guess that I am at a cusp right now. I think my marriage has a lot of
problems, but I don't think it is without salvation. Or - I am terrified
that it is over and has been over for a few years now. But I have
children to consider too.

Mostly I've been trying to figure out what purpose the affair has filled
in my life - what is it that I am not getting from my marriage that I am
finding elsewhere? Or is it truly possible that the two of us just
happen to click so completely that the affair was irresistible? That
sounds so selfish. I don't feel that I am a selfish person. But I do
admit that right now I am torn.

I know that I have to end the affair, especially before it escalates.
Because I know that to continue it will only add to the confusion. But I
don't want to. What if I am letting the greatest love of my life slip
away? But then, shouldn't I be working to create the greatest love of my
life right here in my home?
Vickie - 24 Jun 2008 04:10 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> away? But then, shouldn't I be working to create the greatest love of my
> life right here in my home?

As someone once told me, what you have is not real.
You don't go through the regular trials and tribulations of everyday
life with your secret lover.
You can't start a new beginning without some other beginnings end.

Is the opportunity even available to you to create the greatest love
with the one you had first been committed to?

It is a tragic shame you probably will never know.

Vickie
Pumpkins - 24 Jun 2008 05:01 GMT
> As someone once told me, what you have is not real.
> You don't go through the regular trials and tribulations of everyday
> life with your secret lover.
> You can't start a new beginning without some other beginnings end.

You're right, and I realize that. Granted, we are not paying bills
together or caring for children together or even suffering through
medical crises together. Maybe that is what made it so appealing in the
first place, not the fact that we can talk, but the fact that we can
talk without the voices of children to interrupt or the phone ringing.

> Is the opportunity even available to you to create the greatest love
> with the one you had first been committed to?

I don't know. I've been trying for many years. But often I feel as if I
am the only one trying.

> It is a tragic shame you probably will never know.

Why?

> Vickie
Bill in Co - 24 Jun 2008 05:15 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
>> Vickie

What a complete dumbass!
Barb D. - 24 Jun 2008 11:58 GMT
>x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>I don't know. I've been trying for many years. But often I feel as if I
>am the only one trying.

For those of us who wandered into this group from the dying
alt.support.divorce (ASD), your story is both tragically and boringly
familiar.  Including the justification that crept into this post
(..."I've been trying for years...").  I haven't read beyond this post
yet, so I don't know for certain that I'll find other familiar
canards, but I'd not be surprised.

I know I sound harsh, but it's important for you to know that what
seems unique and special and different to you is really just the same,
exact feelings other people having affairs express -- both about their
affair partner and their spouse.  

Your marriage undoubtedly needs work, but as long as you are
emotionally invested in this other relationship, you're not available
to work on it.  

Think about what this means for your future.  Divorce has devastating
and lasting consequences, especially for children.  

Barb
AllYou! - 24 Jun 2008 12:24 GMT
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> Think about what this means for your future.  Divorce has
> devastating and lasting consequences, especially for children.

all of that, PLUS the fact that there's simply no reason to lie to
his wife about it all.
Bill in Co - 24 Jun 2008 19:13 GMT
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> Barb

Obviously he doesn't care about that.
What you wrote is "harsh"?    Nah.   (What I wrote might have been, though.
:-)
Let's just call it for what it is (aka, "calling a spade a spade").
(I'm always soooo impressed by this side of "humanity", sorry about that).
Vickie - 24 Jun 2008 17:15 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> first place, not the fact that we can talk, but the fact that we can
> talk without the voices of children to interrupt or the phone ringing.

Yes, that's it.

> > Is the opportunity even available to you to create the greatest love
> > with the one you had first been committed to?
>
> I don't know. I've been trying for many years. But often I feel as if I
> am the only one trying.

Most of us are trying and some feel alone in doing it too.

> > It is a tragic shame you probably will never know.
>
> Why?

You do realize that what you did/are doing is a deplorable thing.
It will be up to your partner if they want to work things through, not
you.  You lost all rights in regards to your marriage when you failed
to live up to your vows.

Vickie
Bill in Co - 24 Jun 2008 19:17 GMT
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Vickie

Apparently you haven't been keeping up with the times.    The days of the
Scarlet Letter are long gone.
pennyshiny123@gmail.com - 25 Jun 2008 00:21 GMT
> I don't know. I've been trying for many years. But often I feel as if I
> am the only one trying.

It's very easy to revise history to excuse one's actions in the
present. Make sure to ask yourself if you might not be doing that.

jen
Amy - 24 Jun 2008 04:40 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> away? But then, shouldn't I be working to create the greatest love of my
> life right here in my home?

The grass always seems greener on the other side until you get there.
Many times people say this but it is so true. People enjoy the thrill
of the secrecy but when they are found out it is not fun anymore. You
have to
want to make things better with your spouse. If you don't, then you
won't.
Pumpkins - 24 Jun 2008 05:05 GMT
> The grass always seems greener on the other side until you get there.
> Many times people say this but it is so true. People enjoy the thrill
> of the secrecy but when they are found out it is not fun anymore. You
> have to
> want to make things better with your spouse. If you don't, then you
> won't.

I don't think it's the thrill of the secrecy. I don't feel so thrilled
about the secrecy, I feel anxiety. I do think it is some kind of escape
though. I am just not so sure what I am escaping from.
dejablues - 24 Jun 2008 04:50 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> It all started online, like many affairs do these days. We met while
> participating in a locally based group. And it was one of those things,
> something clicked and after

Blahblahblahblahblah.

Get the f.ck over yourself.
Bill in Co - 24 Jun 2008 05:12 GMT
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Get the f.ck over yourself.

Seconded.    Just (yet another) sign of the *it's all about ME ME ME* times,
and screw the children.    And - he wants "support" for it!
erectdude@mypants.com - 24 Jun 2008 04:54 GMT
>x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>away? But then, shouldn't I be working to create the greatest love of my
>life right here in my home?

Who are you trying to fool?  Last week I had sex with your wife and
she told me that your penis is so small that you can not satisfy ANY
woman.  She said she is not happy with you because she wanted a MAN
(like me), who could arouse her.  Instead she got you with your tiny
worm you call a dick.  You might as well face the truth.  She dont
want you anymore.  You dont satisfy her needs.
spunge - 24 Jun 2008 05:05 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: wdV5uzmQul2rk0eZSkCZOg.user.aioe.org
wdV5uzmQul2rk0eZSkCZOg.user.aioe.org
wdV5uzmQul2rk0eZSkCZOg.user.aioe.org
wdV5uzmQul2rk0eZSkCZOg.user.aioe.org
wdV5uzmQul2rk0eZSkCZOg.user.aioe.org
plonker@PlonkU.com - 24 Jun 2008 09:47 GMT
>NNTP-Posting-Host: wdV5uzmQul2rk0eZSkCZOg.user.aioe.org
>wdV5uzmQul2rk0eZSkCZOg.user.aioe.org
>wdV5uzmQul2rk0eZSkCZOg.user.aioe.org
>wdV5uzmQul2rk0eZSkCZOg.user.aioe.org
>wdV5uzmQul2rk0eZSkCZOg.user.aioe.org

Goodbye Troll

PLONK
Bill in Co - 24 Jun 2008 05:14 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> happen to click so completely that the affair was irresistible? That
> sounds so selfish. I don't feel that I am a selfish person.

I have a suggestion, since you apparently don't get it.    As someone else
suggested, go f.ck yourself.
AllYou! - 24 Jun 2008 12:22 GMT
> The thing is, I can't really say what it is that compels me to
> continue with the affair. I mean beyond the obvious, which is
> that I feel as if I have found my lifemate, and we have an
> incredibly good chemistry and understanding of each other. But
> when I ask myself if I am willing to sacrifice my marriage to
> this affair, the answer has very honestly been no.

Like too many people today, you seem to be confused between reasons
to enter into a new relationship, and reasons to lie about it.  You
can wonder all you want about the reasons why your having this other
relationship, but what's the reason that you're lying about it?
While there might be many reasons why your relationship with your
wife might not be fulfilling, or might even be bad, and while those
might be perfectly understandable reasons to want to seek a
different relationship (although, maybe they are not), there is no
valid reason to lie about it.  None.

First of all, you might find some clarity about the situation if you
stop calling it an 'affair', as though it might as well be some
dinner gala of some sort.  It's not an affair at all.  It's a lie,
and it's a betrayal.  You're engaged in a continuing betrayal of
your wife.  So instead of saying "I'm having an affair", you should
really say "I'm continually betraying my wife".

Now, if you can make a case for why it is that you are not betraying
your wife, then please do.  Otherwise, you should have no problem
saying those words, instead of words that make it sound as though
you're at some sort of party with which your wife would have no
problem.
pennyshiny123@gmail.com - 25 Jun 2008 00:26 GMT
> Now, if you can make a case for why it is that you are not betraying
> your wife, then please do.  Otherwise, you should have no problem
> saying those words, instead of words that make it sound as though
> you're at some sort of party with which your wife would have no
> problem.

Did I miss something or haven't I read far enough? How do you know
it's his wife, and not her husband?

jen
Tai - 25 Jun 2008 02:30 GMT
>> Now, if you can make a case for why it is that you are not betraying
>> your wife, then please do. Otherwise, you should have no problem
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Did I miss something or haven't I read far enough? How do you know
> it's his wife, and not her husband?

I read the gender-neutral posts as if the OP is a woman so I'd be quite
interested in knowing which it is - although it doesn't make any difference
to what I think he/she should do, of course.
Emma Anne - 25 Jun 2008 17:55 GMT
> >> Now, if you can make a case for why it is that you are not betraying
> >> your wife, then please do. Otherwise, you should have no problem
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> interested in knowing which it is - although it doesn't make any difference
> to what I think he/she should do, of course.

Didn't we have another poster who did the gender neutral thing?  Turned
out it was an unusual sort of troll, IIRC.  S/he was "proving" that we
are sexist and give different advice based on the gender of the cheater.
Or I might be mixing up two trolls. . .
Tai - 25 Jun 2008 22:49 GMT
>>>> Now, if you can make a case for why it is that you are not
>>>> betraying your wife, then please do. Otherwise, you should have no
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> that we are sexist and give different advice based on the gender of
> the cheater. Or I might be mixing up two trolls. . .

When someone is so careful to avoid giving clues about their sex it can give
me the impression they are setting up a scenario for a magazine article or
somesuch and it seems very contrived to me. Here they are, presumably in a
great emotional mess, yet are still controlled enough to be carefully
sifting through their word choices. If they are that able to be coolly
analytical why do they need outside opinion in the first place? Even if it's
used as a self-defence mechanism they are probably only wanting to hear what
they are already willing to accept about their situation anyway.
Bill in Co - 25 Jun 2008 04:04 GMT
>> Now, if you can make a case for why it is that you are not betraying
>> your wife, then please do. Otherwise, you should have no problem
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> jen

Maybe s/he's bisexual, or unisex.    Doesn't really matter, does it?
Whoever it is, they're completely clueless, and fully amoral.
As I said, shame apparently doesn't exist anymore these days.    It's all
just a laugh, isn't it?  (don't believe me?  Watch the comedians just pan
it, and affairs, today).
machoman@do-me.com - 25 Jun 2008 13:55 GMT
>> Now, if you can make a case for why it is that you are not betraying
>> your wife, then please do.  Otherwise, you should have no problem
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>jen

Because wives do not have a penis !!!!!!!!
(except yours).
AllYou! - 26 Jun 2008 12:12 GMT
In
news:a3f8917d-8fe9-4e5c-8e1f-23672feec620@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
pennyshiny123@gmail.com <pennyshiny123@gmail.com> mused:

>> Now, if you can make a case for why it is that you are not
>> betraying your wife, then please do. Otherwise, you should have
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Did I miss something or haven't I read far enough? How do you
> know it's his wife, and not her husband?

The OP was gender neutral IIRC, and I didn't want to keep typing
he/her, she/he. etc...  The point remains the same, regardless of
gender.
mr_sbr - 24 Jun 2008 13:13 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> away? But then, shouldn't I be working to create the greatest love of my
> life right here in my home?

Through a series of really bad choices, rationalizations, you've come
to a point where you have two paths.  You can continue to deceive
those around you on a path that leads only to pain and shame
increasingly justifying more egregious lies to your partner, or you
can cut your losses and use it as a catalyst to improve your
relationship with your spouse.  It's sounds simple, but it's really
that clear cut.

Choose wisely, on you worst days you can't imagine how shitty life can
be for all around you if you continue the way your going.
AllYou! - 24 Jun 2008 14:24 GMT
In
news:388c9b20-609e-4a4e-a246-aa38eee7532e@79g2000hsk.googlegroups.com,
mr_sbr <mrsbr_175@hotmail.com> mused:
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
> life can be for all around you if you continue the way your
> going.

That's the best post I've yet seen about this kind of situation.
Pumpkins - 24 Jun 2008 14:56 GMT
> Through a series of really bad choices, rationalizations, you've come
> to a point where you have two paths.  You can continue to deceive
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Choose wisely, on you worst days you can't imagine how shitty life can
> be for all around you if you continue the way your going.

You are right. I suppose I already knew the answers, and I know what I
have to do, I just needed to hear it. It will be difficult to break off
the affair, but not nearly as difficult as what will happen if I am
discovered, or if my marriage ends.
mr_sbr - 24 Jun 2008 15:16 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> the affair, but not nearly as difficult as what will happen if I am
> discovered, or if my marriage ends.

I'm probably one of the few people here that will concede that yes it
will be hard to break it off without a speech about how you deserve it
(you do by the way :).  It will suck, and it will suck for a while to
come, but more importantly than sucking, it's the right thing to do,
tough but right.

You've already f.cked up, that can't be changed, but hopefully you can
look back someday knowing that today was the day that you started
doing the right thing.  Good luck.
AllYou! - 24 Jun 2008 15:30 GMT
In
news:dc77c453-d30b-42ce-8c29-d02262b05921@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com,
mr_sbr <mrsbr_175@hotmail.com> mused:
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> you can look back someday knowing that today was the day that
> you started doing the right thing.  Good luck.

I can't think of too many people that would disagree that it will be
difficult to do the right thing.  Doing the right thing is only ever
worth noting to the extent that it's difficult anyway.  So yes, it
will be tough, but yes, it's irrelevant.

Frankly, there's nothing in what the OP has said that convinces me
that he 'gets it', even though it appears that he will 'do the right
thing'.  In fact, in this last post of his, he's made it clear that
he's going to do what's in his own best interest, and the fact that
it happens to also be the right thing to do is irrelevant.  It was
irrelevant when he decided to begin betraying his wife, and it's
still irrelevant now that he's decided to end the betrayal.
mr_sbr - 24 Jun 2008 15:54 GMT
> Innews:dc77c453-d30b-42ce-8c29-d02262b05921@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com,
> mr_sbr <mrsbr_...@hotmail.com> mused:
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> irrelevant when he decided to begin betraying his wife, and it's
> still irrelevant now that he's decided to end the betrayal.

Sometimes doing the right thing for the wrong reasons is good enough
to get the ball rolling.  You stop drinking because of a DWI, you stop
cheating for fear of getting caught, you stop doing drugs because you
get fired for flunking a drug test.  All may motivate a person to seek
help yet not address the reason for the behavior, but that first step
to doing the right thing (recovery) its recognizing the behavior.
Hopefully that person can find out the root of the behavior as they
continue to avoid that behavior.....but stopping is the first step.

I know this may be a fundamental difference in philosophy between you
and I and have lead to disagreements over the years, but I do
understand your point.  I just know from personal experience that for
me at least, putting a stop to the the wrong behaviors was the only
thing to give me perspective on the situation to address the root
problems.  Everybody else's millage may vary.
AllYou! - 24 Jun 2008 18:06 GMT
In
news:25d170c9-5a65-4394-81db-9e106bdc7853@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com,
mr_sbr <mrsbr_175@hotmail.com> mused:
>> Innews:dc77c453-d30b-42ce-8c29-d02262b05921@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com,
>> mr_sbr <mrsbr_...@hotmail.com> mused:
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
> situation to address the root problems.  Everybody else's
> millage may vary.

I agree that whatever it took for you to get to where you are, it
worked, because your first post to the OP, among others that I've
read from you, tells me that we're almost exactly on the same page
when it comes to infidelity.  So I'll have hope for the OP as well.
I'm just not as optimistic as you that it's generally a good way to
'salvation'.

Good posts.
AllYou! - 24 Jun 2008 15:34 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> difficult to break off the affair, but not nearly as difficult
> as what will happen if I am discovered, or if my marriage ends.

It's too bad that you don't seem to get it yet.  You began betraying
your wife for what you perceived was in your best interests back
then, and you've continued to betray her with only your best
interests in mind, and now, if you follow through on ending your
betrayal, it seems that the only reason you'll be doing so is again,
because of your best interests.  Truth, loyalty, trust, commitment,
and the pain that you will bring to your wife seem not to enter your
decision making process at all.  That does not bode well for the
future.
Pumpkins - 24 Jun 2008 16:39 GMT
> It's too bad that you don't seem to get it yet.  You began betraying
> your wife for what you perceived was in your best interests back
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> decision making process at all.  That does not bode well for the
> future.

You are right, it does not bode well for the future. I understand
loyalty, as I have stood by my spouse through some very difficult times
in the past 13 years. Our marriage has had to endure more difficult than
average circumstances in a short time.

Trust and truth are shaky, and that hinges on some underlying problems
in the marriage. I won't claim that I am not a part of those problems,
but my spouse is part of those problems as well. I am growing to
understand that I have to take responsibility for what I do, regardless
of what my spouse does. My partner is insecure and jealous and has been
so from the beginning of our marriage. In the past, I have not even been
able to talk to my partner about co-workers of the opposite sex without
the insinuations and resentment arising. Unfortunately, that has set the
tone for the marriage.

Some days the marriage is great, and then there are others when the
problems com to the surface and I just think that the marriage is over
and has been over for quite some time.

I am inclined to stick it out. For many reasons, because we have a life
together and children together and because we have invested our lives in
this, dysfunctional as it may seem. I don't expect things to be perfect.
I think when you put people in a home together, there is bound to be
conflict. But ... what happened? How did I end up here?

Obviously, I know. I didn't expect the affair to happen, but I can't say
that I didn't intend for it to happen. I'm just trying to figure out how
to fix it.
AllYou! - 24 Jun 2008 18:03 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> can't say that I didn't intend for it to happen. I'm just trying
> to figure out how to fix it.

I won't belabor the point I made earlier to you except to say that
there's nothing in what you just posted that's changed my mind.  As
to fixing 'the affair', whatever that means, it's as simple as not
having gotten into the betrayal in the first place.  Simply stop.
Every time you have a communication with the OW, every time you see
her, every time you are intimate with her, you have once again
betrayed your DW.  There's only one communication left to have, and
that's to tell the OW that it's over, that you can't betray your DW
like that anymore, and that there will be no contact between you
anymore.

The fact that you think you've got to 'try' to 'figure out' how to
'fix' it, is just a continuation of the ridiculous rationalizations
by which you justified the betrayals in the first place.
pennyshiny123@gmail.com - 25 Jun 2008 00:20 GMT
> Mostly I've been trying to figure out what purpose the affair has filled
> in my life - what is it that I am not getting from my marriage that I am
> finding elsewhere?

Or what is it you are trying to avoid in your marriage? Deepening
intimacy, perhaps? Affairs are not always about what is missing.
Sometimes they are about something positive that is overwhelmingly
there, and increasing.... and even if it is all good, it is scary. So
you introduce a third person to create a triangle and buy yourself
some stability and distance.

And sometimes it has absolutely zero to do with your partner, and
everything to do with you. Maybe you are avoiding major emotional work
you need to do for yourself.

What age are the kids? Are they at a major milestone - like going into
school or leaving the nest?

Have you moved recently?

Has a loved one died or become ill? Your parents, perhaps?

What happened in your family of origin, when your mom was your age
now?

jen
Rog' - 25 Jun 2008 01:55 GMT
Pumpkins <pumpk...@not.valid.com> wrote:
> Mostly I've been trying to figure out what purpose the affair
> has filled in my life - what is it that I am not getting from my
> marriage that I am finding elsewhere?

What you are finding is a way for your inner knuckle-dragger
to express itself instead of acting like a stand-upright person
who faces the real issues in their relationship.  You'd rather act
like a clod than face the reality of your marriage.  Either that, or
you're just a cold-hearted cretin who doesn't care who gets hurt
as long as you get your jollies.
dejablues - 25 Jun 2008 02:27 GMT
> Pumpkins <pumpk...@not.valid.com> wrote:
>> Mostly I've been trying to figure out what purpose the affair
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> you're just a cold-hearted cretin who doesn't care who gets hurt
> as long as you get your jollies.

Why does everyone think the OP is a man, when it's so obviously a woman?
Tai - 25 Jun 2008 02:37 GMT
>> Pumpkins <pumpk...@not.valid.com> wrote:
>>> Mostly I've been trying to figure out what purpose the affair
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Why does everyone think the OP is a man, when it's so obviously a
> woman?

I'm with you, but I'm not sure why. Perhaps it was a combination of the
language used and this:

"Maybe that is what made it so appealing in the first place, not the fact
that we can talk, but the fact that we can talk without the voices of
children to interrupt or the phone ringing."
Vickie - 25 Jun 2008 02:54 GMT
> > Pumpkins <pumpk...@not.valid.com> wrote:
> >> Mostly I've been trying to figure out what purpose the affair
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Why does everyone think the OP is a man, when it's so obviously a woman?

I couldn't figure it out myself, so I stayed gender neutral in my
posts, thank you very much.

Vickie
Rog' - 25 Jun 2008 03:36 GMT
> "Rog'" <rcblinnNoSpam@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>> What you are finding is a way for your inner knuckle-dragger
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> you're just a cold-hearted cretin who doesn't care who gets hurt
>> as long as you get your jollies.

> Why does everyone think the OP is a man, when it's so obviously
> a woman?

I tried to keep my post (above) gender-neutral.  Admittedly, some
of my perjorative terminology is commonly used to describe male
behavior; however, I would submit that, in this case, its equally
applicable to a woman... knuckle-dragger, cretin, getting her jollies.
Doug Freyburger - 25 Jun 2008 16:27 GMT
> Why does everyone think the OP is a man, when it's so obviously a woman?

The only reasons either why I see are very cliche' -

I have been called "Pumpkin" by a girlfriend back in my
single days but I've never heard any man refer to himself
as Pumpkin and definitely not Pumpkins.  Since the
account was apparently opened anonymously specificly
for this discussion it's a self depricating term.  I can, just
barely, imagine a woman using such a term anonymously
specificlly for anonymity.  I can't imagine a man even
thinking up such a handle unless he's a farmer who grows
them as a crop.

There are men who won't view it as an affair until it is
consumated.  There are women who will view it as an
affair as soon as it includes emotional attachment
independent of consumation.  Both extremes are very
stereotyped.

Both hints are weak but they are enough to carry a
guess for me.  Not that it really matters if the OP is male,
female or whatever.  Neuter drone bees can't type and
we wouldn't have enough in common to discuss their
family situations ...
Bill in Co - 25 Jun 2008 04:08 GMT
> Pumpkins <pumpk...@not.valid.com> wrote:
>> Mostly I've been trying to figure out what purpose the affair
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> you're just a cold-hearted cretin who doesn't care who gets hurt
> as long as you get your jollies.

Please DO try to keep up with the times, and pretending to be an old fogie.
Affairs are perfectly acceptable today, in case you haven't heard.   See,
it's all about the ME ME ME generation today, as you fully well know.

And as I said before, it's sooo good for the late nite comedians on TV,
because it is sooo cool and acceptable today.    Doesn't even raise an
eyebrow anymore.

Viva Le Nouveau Age De Enlightenmente (aka - anything goes)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.