Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Marriage / Marriage / June 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Venting time - it is my week for depression.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Doug Laidlaw - 27 Jun 2008 09:05 GMT
As objectively as I can be, marriage can be a mystery.  There are things
about my wife that I think don't meet my needs; I have sensed in the
company of other women that they would be far more suitable in those
regards.  I could say that I waited too long, until the field was limited.

But despite all that, there is a solid bond between us.  I find the
relationship very satisfying and very dissatisfying at the same time.

As I said, a mystery.

Doug L.
AllYou! - 27 Jun 2008 12:14 GMT
> As objectively as I can be, marriage can be a mystery.  There
> are things about my wife that I think don't meet my needs; I
> have sensed in the company of other women that they would be far
> more suitable in those regards.  I could say that I waited too
> long, until the field was limited.

I would've felt better about this had you acknowledged that you
understand that it's a mirage (i.e., not real).   While there may
very well be someone or other out there that would be a better fit
for you, the chances that they can be found almost anywhere (which
is what I infer by the phrase 'in the company of other women', as
though it happens with almost any other women) are very, very slim.
You were attracted to your DW because, at one time, you thought the
same thing about her, and as you got to know her better, you felt
that way increasingly more.

> But despite all that, there is a solid bond between us.  I find
> the relationship very satisfying and very dissatisfying at the
> same time.
>
> As I said, a mystery.

In this context, 'mysterious' is a relative term. and so it's not
all that mysterious if you realize that all human interactions are
filled with mysteries that we may never understand.  You strike me
as an incredibly intelligent, articulate person who is more than
capable of figuring out how to have discussions with his DW so that
you can explore those things that are dissatisfying in your
marriage.  The mystery for me is why you don't do more of that with
her.
Doug Laidlaw - 27 Jun 2008 14:19 GMT
>> As objectively as I can be, marriage can be a mystery.  There
>> are things about my wife that I think don't meet my needs; I
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> marriage.  The mystery for me is why you don't do more of that with
> her.

I can explore all I like.  To her, it is irrelevant.  I think that I
empathised with Xorra on this - it is like talking a different language.
The language, the concepts that I use, are like Greek to her.  We were both
loners - I because of depression, probably, and she because she was an only
child.  I want a momma; she wants a substitute father, she told me.  Both
wanting to be followers makes both dissatisfied.  Her father was a passive
type, but intelligent; her mother was the driving force.  My father was
dominating, but my mother wasn't the opposite of hers.  Neither of us was
exposed to much affection or display of affection in the home.  We are
basically from very similar backgrounds, socially, financially, in
education and religion.

I do wish that we had done more interacting in the early days, but she
couldn't see the need.  At about our second Christmas, I suggested that we
do a bit of marriage strengthening, only vaguely conceived. She thought it
unnecessary. Like many couples we became team workers, bringing up the
children as a team more than a couple.  Before that, we were often a team
in the youth club where we met.  That teamwork IMO, is the strength of our
relationship.  But we still tend to keep away from intimacy.  My depression
seems to add the barrier of anhedonia - the inability to enjoy things.

I am not looking for a better fit.  I am more monogamous by constitution
than many.  I keep coming back to the Hippie idea of one partner for each
of several qualities.  It can't work, because really, that isn't what it is
all about. A person as a whole is more important than the sum of the parts.
I know about "distant fields are always greener."  Somebody else will
always have the missing piece of the jigsaw, but only the missing piece.
As you say, the ideal partner doesn't exist, and near enough can be made to
work with a bit of application.  In the days of arranged marriages, the
couple usually made it work, and some of those marriages were extremely
happy (if the arranging was done with their interests in mind, not the
parents' empire-building.)

I think that I tend to verbalise what others simply accept.  

Doug L.
AllYou! - 27 Jun 2008 14:42 GMT
>>> As objectively as I can be, marriage can be a mystery.  There
>>> are things about my wife that I think don't meet my needs; I
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
>
> I think that I tend to verbalise what others simply accept.

Thanks for the insight.  I feel badly for you that your wife seems
to refuse to engage in a dialog with you about all of this.  It may
be that she believes that it's irrelevant, or, as I suspect, the
claim of irrelevance is a red-herring.  I suggest to you that she
suspects that the dialog will take her to places which are well
outside of her comfort zone, and that this intense discomfort is
what is causing her kill the dialog before it ever begins.

Somehow, some way, you've got to figure out a way to attract her to
that dialog, or at least reduce her discomfort for having it.  It
will take someone a whole lot smarter than me in the matters of the
mind to offer any advice of any value to you o how to do that, but
it seems to me that you're much better equipped than most, including
me, to make the attempt.

Good Luck to you.
Doug Laidlaw - 28 Jun 2008 06:16 GMT
>>>> As objectively as I can be, marriage can be a mystery.  There
>>>> are things about my wife that I think don't meet my needs; I
[quoted text clipped - 85 lines]
>
> Good Luck to you.

It isn't so much that, as am I wanting something unrealistic?  I can't think
too clearly at the moment, but what I am trying to say is that a really
close marriage isn't our style.  We are both over 60.  I have been a
matrimonial lawyer, and we have "no-fault" divorce, based on one year's
separation.  When relationships vary from couples that are never seen apart
to "open marriages", it is often difficult to decide when an open-style
marriage has broken down.  I myself have a tendency to withdraw.

The depression complicates it in two ways: the depression itself means I
can't enjoy the relationship, and my medication affects my sexual
functioning, but not the longing for sex.  My wife has the usual lack of
interest as her hormone levels go down.  (That is one thing that I read
about HRT:  when it is prescribed for other reasons, interest in sex goes
up, and the husband may be unable to meet the increased demand.)  But HRT
has its dangers, and we have never considered it. She now has health issues
as well.  Her upbringing that sex is to be avoided outside marriage seems
to have become an emotional barrier again within marriage, or it may be
simply an excuse.  But it is more the closeness that I miss, and that may
be largely on my side.

In the long run, I think that its a question of being thankful for what I
have.  I try to look on the depression as a disability rather than an
illness.  The disabled demonstrate that they aren't write-offs.  They find
ways around their disability.

Doug L.
Caitriona Mac Fhiodhbhuidhe - 27 Jun 2008 13:48 GMT
> As objectively as I can be, marriage can be a mystery.  There are things
> about my wife that I think don't meet my needs; I have sensed in the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> As I said, a mystery.

C'est la vie, n'est pas?

That's the way it is with life.  Even the best of friends aren't a
perfect fit in every aspect.  But that keeps the challenge going.  :-)

Kitten
Michaela - 29 Jun 2008 21:28 GMT
> As objectively as I can be, marriage can be a mystery.  There are
> things about my wife that I think don't meet my needs; I have sensed
> in the company of other women that they would be far more suitable
in
> those regards.  I could say that I waited too long, until the field
> was limited.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Doug L.

I think the problem may be that we think monogamy is the way to go.

I'm not saying that anyone should consider sleeping around, just that
perhaps we need as many friends/mentors/people we can help/whatever
as we can get in life.

Sometimes those who need the most get the least. I think there may be
a pattern to that. i.e. the more love we are able to give the more
love
we have in our lives.

- Michaela
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.