Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Marriage / Marriage / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Could this have been it?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Erin - 28 Jun 2008 13:55 GMT
Regarding the possible medical causes
that may have changed my DH's personality
some four years ago... i found in my journal
that on this one particular yr. not only were
there many family deaths, sicknesses, and
stressful events; not only was he taken off
his AD down to 0 percipitating a suicide
attempt, but prior to these he was actually
given a mega mix of two meds which, i just
looked up:

http://www.drugs.com/drug_interactions.php

Like I said, medications may have played a
big role in his "out-of-character" behaviour.
To show that I am not excusing this, I am
not saying that I am not holding him responsible
or that I do not feel that we have issues, but
I am saying that many domestic crises are
depression or medical problem-related.
Certainly, the suicide attempt had nothing to do
with the marriage or me, but rather with the
med withdrawal and accumulated stress.

Erin
Erin - 28 Jun 2008 13:58 GMT
> Regarding the possible medical causes
> that may have changed my DH's personality
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Erin

p.s. Excuse me for double-posting.... i just noticed
that the drug interaction checker needs feeding when
reposted:  the drugs were 900mg lithium AND 300mg imipramine;
the risk; mania and neuroleptic malignant syndrome, among others,
within only a few days of taking it.

E
Erin - 28 Jun 2008 15:05 GMT
> > Regarding the possible medical causes
> > that may have changed my DH's personality
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> E

NMS -

The symptoms i noticed developing was cognitive problems and
daytime sleep attacks-- very unusual; here is another site on
the Neuroleptic syndrome with lithium and tricyclics, of which
imipramine is one.  Encephalopathy is one the reactions which
may be revrsible.

   NEUROLEPTIC MALIGNANT SYNDROME

   DEFINITION

   A life-threatening idiosyncratic reaction characterized by muscle
   rigidity and hyperthermia, related to acute dopamine depletion,
either
   from the use of neuroleptic drugs or of dopamine antagonists, or
the
   withdrawal of dopamine agonists.

   TOXIC CAUSES

   Exposure to therapeutic doses of potent neuroleptic drugs (eg,
   haloperidol, fluphenazine) or the sudden cessation of dopamine
   agonists such as amantidine. Reported risk factors include
dehydration
   and the concurrent use of lithium and tricyclic antidepressants.

..../from http://www.intox.org/databank/documents/treat/treate/trt37_e.htm
   ------------

E
Rog' - 28 Jun 2008 15:50 GMT
> Regarding the possible medical causes that
> may have changed my DH's personality...

Many people with mind-altering medications and
serious personal crises will engage in anti-social
behavior, some will throw long-term relationships
to the wind, some will spiral out of control, so
you may be on to something.  But in our society,
we do not absolve people of responsibility for
their behavior, unless they are criminally insane
and cannot tell the diff. between right and wrong.

In my line of work (criminal law).  I hear excuses
from family and friends all the time. "If it weren't
for the drugs" or "He needs help, not jail."  Sorry,
but even unintended actions have consequences,
usually.  But you keep letting him off the hook, or
at least it seems so.
Bill in Co - 28 Jun 2008 21:49 GMT
>> Regarding the possible medical causes that
>> may have changed my DH's personality...
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> their behavior, unless they are criminally insane
> and cannot tell the diff. between right and wrong.

Really?   Even today?    We must be living on different planets.

> In my line of work (criminal law).  I hear excuses
> from family and friends all the time. "If it weren't
> for the drugs" or "He needs help, not jail."

EXACTLY.    But then some lawyer WILL get them OFF, and pocket the change
(translation: we'll split the proceeds with said "victim" (snort).

Speaking of which, how are the ambulance chasers making out these days?
(rhetorical)

> Sorry, but even unintended actions have consequences, usually.

Maybe usually.    But there sure seems to be a hell of a lot of exceptions
these days.

> But you keep letting him off the hook, or at least it seems so.

She's looking for a "reason" or "explanation" as part of the grieving
process.    But truth be told, the answer lies in the wind.....
Doug Laidlaw - 29 Jun 2008 05:37 GMT
>>> Regarding the possible medical causes that
>>> may have changed my DH's personality...
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> She's looking for a "reason" or "explanation" as part of the grieving
> process.    But truth be told, the answer lies in the wind.....

(Sorry to pinch your thread, Erin.  I can only say to you what I have said
before: forget about DH's motives.  He is the only one who knows them.
React instead to his actions.  Rog' has probably heard the saying by an
English Judge, "The Devil himself knoweth not the mind of man."  And at
least see him as a separate, responsible individual.)

Bill, I agree with Rog'.  Every criminal (well, almost every one) has a
motive.  They all see themselves as doing "the right thing" by some
standard, as they see it.  In a sense, that is what moves them to do it.
But our legal system can't allow that as an excuse.  The law sets down a
framework, and misfits are treated as criminals.  I can use homosexuals as
an example.  Oscar Wilde got jail for being a homosexual.  Nowadays, apart
from the prejudiced people, we see homosexuals as either a different type
of normal, or as sick, not criminals.  We give "habitual drunkards" jail,
when it isn't what they need.

But what they need and what they want are two different things.  I
represented a man who had previously shot dead one man, then took a dislike
to a couple in my area, shot and wounded them both, then staged a
typical "siege" or shootout.  I mentioned to the prison psychiatrist that
he needed help.  The psychiatrist agreed, but said that he refused to take
it.  Our society won't force help on him, and appropriate help probably
can't be forced anyway.  All that we could do with him was treat him as he
wanted to be treated, a rational, deliberate criminal.

I think that you have made the remark about defence lawyers before.  I agree
that it seems wrong, and if people are regularly getting off when they
shouldn't be, the system needs to be changed.  In some countries,
prosecutors are like your concept of defence lawyers.  They are there to
get a conviction, by fair means or foul.  But to deal with the accused
appropriately, the Judge and jury need to hear everything that can be said
on his behalf.  If the law has loopholes, the accused may have breached the
intent of the law, but he hasn't breached the law itself.  I have seen the
opposite: the accused did something that should be punished, but he didn't
breach a known law, so they brought in the nearest they could find.  Police
magistrates are most likely to give "bush justice" and to go for that kind
of thing.  The Judges have always said that patching up loopholes is not
their job, but Parliament's.

Doug L.
Solicitor, Victoria, Australia.
Erin - 29 Jun 2008 12:15 GMT
> >>> Regarding the possible medical causes that
> >>> may have changed my DH's personality...
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
> Doug L.
> Solicitor, Victoria, Australia.

I think you have the greatest amount of common sense here; a tad
cynical i suppose in light of my wild optimism.  I'm not sure i like
to
compare this case to a criminal one-- not yet-- lol -- just kidding
really,
but the point about everything being clear and the looholes providing
miscarriages of "justice" are valid points.  And in the realm of human
interaction, every man has his own secrets and goals in life which may
not be made transparent to those who may oppose them.  I suppose that
is the price of freedom, and i don't think it's a bad thing at all.
If you are
religious, you can say, it is not up to you to judge a man but to the
Lord
ultimately.  If not, perhaps, up to the man's own conscience and
nobody else's.

Erin
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 18:40 GMT
>>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes that
>>>>> may have changed my DH's personality...
[quoted text clipped - 102 lines]
>
> Erin

Trouble is, a lot of people obviously don't have a conscience.
phelbooth - 29 Jun 2008 18:54 GMT
On Jun 29, 12:40 pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

> >>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes that
> >>>>> may have changed my DH's personality...
[quoted text clipped - 104 lines]
>
> Trouble is, a lot of people obviously don't have a conscience.

What is a conscience?
Erin - 29 Jun 2008 19:20 GMT
> On Jun 29, 12:40 pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 109 lines]
>
> What is a conscience?

In short, internalized rules of behaviour, learned early and
reinforced through social habit-- that's what i think it is.

Here is is a link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscience

Erin
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 19:34 GMT
> On Jun 29, 12:40 pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 118 lines]
>
> What is a conscience?

Exactly.   :-)
Wanna know the real answer here?
The answer to that is just "...blowin in the wind...", my friend.
AllYou! - 30 Jun 2008 14:20 GMT
>> What is a conscience?
>
> Exactly.   :-)
> Wanna know the real answer here?
> The answer to that is just "...blowin in the wind...", my friend.

Can't you ever contribute anything of substance?  Anything at all,
'lil Fraudo?
Bill in Co - 30 Jun 2008 19:07 GMT
>>> What is a conscience?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Can't you ever contribute anything of substance?  Anything at all,
> 'lil Fraudo?

I realize that that parable is a bit above your paygrade, grasshopper.
But I'm sorry, I really can't help you with that.
AllYou! - 30 Jun 2008 19:20 GMT
AllYou! - 30 Jun 2008 14:19 GMT
> Trouble is, a lot of people obviously don't have a conscience.

Like you do?  LOL!!!!!!!
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 19:18 GMT
>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes that
>>>> may have changed my DH's personality...
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> motive.  They all see themselves as doing "the right thing" by some
> standard, as they see it.  In a sense, that is what moves them to do it.

I don't think they see anything.    They just grap what they want, and say
"screw the consequences if I can get away with it!".   "It's all about ME ME
ME, and MY instant gratification, and f.ck everybody else".

They don't see it as "doing the right thing".    They're too stupid and
inconsiderate.

> But our legal system can't allow that as an excuse.  The law sets down a
> framework, and misfits are treated as criminals.  I can use homosexuals as
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> can't be forced anyway.  All that we could do with him was treat him as he
> wanted to be treated, a rational, deliberate criminal.

Help him?    He needs to be locked up.    You say that isn't what he needs?
Actually, it IS, because there is no other REAL alternative.   (You can't
reform them anyways, so it's a moot point).

> I think that you have made the remark about defence lawyers before.  I
> agree
> that it seems wrong, and if people are regularly getting off when they
> shouldn't be, the system needs to be changed.

It ain't gonna happen.    (Such systemic problems are rarely really
resolved, just patched.    We plug up the leaks with chewing gum).     The
political will, AND follow through, just ain't there.

> In some countries,
> prosecutors are like your concept of defence lawyers.  They are there to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Doug L.
> Solicitor, Victoria, Australia.
Doug Laidlaw - 29 Jun 2008 05:47 GMT
> But in our society,
> we do not absolve people of responsibility for
> their behavior, unless they are criminally insane
> and cannot tell the diff. between right and wrong.

Do you still have the M'Naghten Rules, then?

Doug L.
Rog' - 29 Jun 2008 12:50 GMT
>> But in our society, we do not absolve people of
>> responsibility for their behavior, unless they are
>> criminally insane and cannot tell the diff. between
>> right and wrong.

> Do you still have the M'Naghten Rules, then?

Yep.  Most states, although a few adopted a more
liberal "mental defect" rule.

The point to Erin:  You want an explanation for his
behavior?  No matter how whacked out he may
have been, your DH still possessed the free will to
choose between good or evil.  That's mine.  But
this begs the question:  "Do you want to live with
someone who would treat you this way?"
Erin - 29 Jun 2008 13:23 GMT
> >> But in our society, we do not absolve people of
> >> responsibility for their behavior, unless they are
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> this begs the question:  "Do you want to live with
> someone who would treat you this way?"

Well, as i said earlier, just a few posts above,
the moral stability of a person can vary according
to circumstances.  So that a man may be capable
of something he would later regret due to any number
of unusual stormy aspects of his life and his mental
state.  Unless he is born to be perpetually in a state
of rage or homocidal mania ( a very unlikely condition
in the worst of cases ) an act which is "out of character"
will occur at some point in a person's life and not every
day or month or year.  So free will does exist even
in the grips of unusual mental states, but it is free in
degrees of compulsion and stresses.  I think a lot
of philosophers speak of free will as if it is a metaphysical
entity when it is really a description of transient and
limited states of volition.

As for "treating me this way"-- it is precisely because
of the unusual and sudden change of treatment for
a short period of time, that I propose the medical stressors
as depriving the will to act according to typical behaviour
not only regarding me, but other people as well, and also
himself.  It should also be take into account, that after
the AD was reinstated the behaviour turned to the previous
typical character and values.  So, this is an example of the
inconstancy of free will, according to the effect of extreme
changes in the brain.

Erin
Rog' - 29 Jun 2008 20:19 GMT
> As for "treating me this way"-- it is precisely because
> of the unusual and sudden change of treatment for
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> inconstancy of free will, according to the effect of extreme
> changes in the brain.
------------
I believe that often, a medical crisis or other trauma reveals
what is at the core of a person's soul.  It strips away the face
we show the world, our veneer and, without that contraint,
our true self is uncovered.  My theory anyway.
Erin - 29 Jun 2008 20:45 GMT
> > As for "treating me this way"-- it is precisely because
> > of the unusual and sudden change of treatment for
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> we show the world, our veneer and, without that contraint,
> our true self is uncovered.  My theory anyway.

That has actually crossed my mind very often; but it is hard
to confirm, as emotions are distorted under medical crises--
on the other hand they may also be revealed;

Erin
Lauri - 30 Jun 2008 01:17 GMT
>I believe that often, a medical crisis or other trauma reveals
>what is at the core of a person's soul.  It strips away the face
>we show the world, our veneer and, without that contraint,
>our true self is uncovered.  My theory anyway.

Similar to how I feel that alcohol reveals a person's true character!
Signature

Lauri in WA

Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 19:11 GMT
>>> But in our society, we do not absolve people of
>>> responsibility for their behavior, unless they are
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> this begs the question:  "Do you want to live with
> someone who would treat you this way?"

Given the alternative, clearly yes.     Hello?
pennyshiny123@gmail.com - 28 Jun 2008 17:01 GMT
> Regarding the possible medical causes
> that may have changed my DH's personality
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Erin

What year was it, Erin?

I confess, out of boredom (and also interest), I went back and read
through all your posts to ASM since 2000. Back in 2000-2002 timeframe,
you would often post about:

1) your lack of interest in sex, and belief that it wasn't important
in a marriage
2) your DH and you both spending too much time on the computer (you
even mentioned your DH was getting fat, because of the lack of
exercise.

Throughout this period, you seemed happy and in love and content with
your marriage.

Then from 2002-2007 (approx) we didn't hear much from you (unless you
were using another nym). Is this when everything happened?

I'm just wondering if perhaps it wasn't some medical/mental health
crisis that set it all off with your DH? Perhaps items #1 and #2 had
more to do with your drifting apart?

You wouldn't be the first marriage that becomes vulnerable to an
affair because the couple neglects each other, spending less time
together, and there is a discrepancy between sex drives.

Could it be that your DH missed the sex?

There was also a post in which you said that you were okay with your
spouse cheating, provided he did it discretely.

Anyway, I hope you don't consider that stalking.... I sometimes go
back through my own posts because memory does have a way of revising
itself.

jen
Erin - 28 Jun 2008 18:15 GMT
pennyshiny...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Regarding the possible medical causes
> > that may have changed my DH's personality
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
>
> jen

Yes problems started around 2000-2007:

- family suicide
- father death and horrible illness
- mother death and horrible stroke
- many pet deaths
- medication mistakes leading to serious problems
- suicide attempts (hanging)
- stress at work
- house management problems
- broken leg injury
- estate headaches
- another death in the family
- heart attack in family
- recent problem with marital break
- neurological or tinnitus problem coming up

-- through it all i would say lithium has saved me
and kept me remarkably stable given the problems
we had to deal with and solve.  To give my DH
credit through it all he never stopped working and
tried his best.  I think we deserve a medal from NAMI :-).

All deaths required a lot of work on our part, very
stressful; drug problems were hardly conducive
to high sex urge with all the business; but that was
not a problem with the organs or libido, but just a
really stressful life;

In my opinion life would have been much easier had
he (and me at some points) the attention of a
psychiatrist with psychopharmacological expertise.
I bet you did not see my posts at benzo.org-- that
is when i started using the computer at home.

as for looking at my posts -- well, make of them what
you will -- i think everyone posts now.

Erin
Erin - 28 Jun 2008 20:03 GMT
> pennyshiny...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Regarding the possible medical causes
[quoted text clipped - 99 lines]
>
> Erin

p.s.  I forgot to mention the Ice Storm, which shut the city down and
we had to rescue a blind relative through icy streets covered with
downed trees and debris to get to a local Shelter;

-and about sex, which seems to have struck your interest within
the context of so many other problems, imipramine inhibits libido;
nevertheless we never had serious problems in this area if
it were not for the stressful years (married 30 yrs.).

- the benzo problem lasted 15 years and gave me panic attacks
throughout, every single day, until i joined the benzo group and
discovered i had become addicted.

- i don't feel bitter because things are turning out well, and
there are many people who have lost their lives to an overwhelmed
and corporate medical climate, esp. in pharmaceutical proliferation.
I don't blame the doctors.  I do blame the drug companies for
not being more ethical and responsible, investing their money
of clinics and pragmatic analysis of their products' effects.

Erin
Bill in Co - 28 Jun 2008 21:40 GMT
>> pennyshiny...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes
[quoted text clipped - 121 lines]
>
> Erin

I don't think it's right to blame the drug companies, EXCEPT for their
contrived high prices, and their trying to prevent us now from getting
cheaper prescription drugs and generics from outside of the USA.    (You
know, as if the FDA protection label really means a hell of a lot.   (See,
they're just out to "protect us"!)   (snort)
YooperBoyka - 29 Jun 2008 04:11 GMT
> p.s.  I forgot to mention the Ice Storm,...

Jesus,...the hell with usenet,...you really need to call Jerry Springer.
You're sittin' on a gold mine.
Doug Laidlaw - 29 Jun 2008 13:14 GMT
>> p.s.  I forgot to mention the Ice Storm,...
>
> Jesus,...the hell with usenet,...you really need to call Jerry Springer.
> You're sittin' on a gold mine.

It is better than my "Gulf War Virus."

Doug L.
also kato - 29 Jun 2008 04:21 GMT
> p.s.  I forgot to mention the Ice Storm, which shut the city down and
> we had to rescue a blind relative through icy streets covered with
> downed trees and debris to get to a local Shelter;

Sounds like the Montreal ice storm of January 1998, but it can't be
that because you said ALL your problems started in 2000
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 04:31 GMT
>> p.s. I forgot to mention the Ice Storm, which shut the city down and
>> we had to rescue a blind relative through icy streets covered with
>> downed trees and debris to get to a local Shelter;
>
> Sounds like the Montreal ice storm of January 1998, but it can't be
> that because you said ALL your problems started in 2000

:-)
(And blaming the ice storm is NOT the answer.    :-)
(And besides which, you can't sue the ice storm - at least not as of yet).
But, give it time, and I wouldn't be surprised at all if some scumbag
lawyers wouldn't just chomp at the bit, and jump up and take on the case for
$$$)
Bill in Co - 28 Jun 2008 21:43 GMT
> Regarding the possible medical causes
> that may have changed my DH's personality
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Erin

I guess it helps to keep trying to find a "cause" for all this, Erin.   At
least it is part of the grieving process.     But in reality, I'm not so
sure it will help.  :-(
Erin - 28 Jun 2008 22:05 GMT
> > Regarding the possible medical causes
> > that may have changed my DH's personality
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> least it is part of the grieving process.     But in reality, I'm not so
> sure it will help.  :-(

I was hoping that with the recent hearing of voices and
musical tunes repetitively, it would come to the point where
a referral to a neurologist or autologist would reveal something
more than a blood test could.  He has been seeming odd and
ill since about four yrs. ago, when i thought Serzone might
have affected the liver-- that seems unikely now, so maybe
a head injury?  a medical problem?  Surely, there must be
a way of investigating these symptoms.

I am curious to know why you thing that trying to find a "cause"
will not help;

Erin
Bill in Co - 28 Jun 2008 22:19 GMT
>>> Regarding the possible medical causes
>>> that may have changed my DH's personality
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> Erin

Because trying to find some sort of "explanation" for it won't change
anything (from what I can see).   It's just an exercise in trying to
understand something.

Here is a far out example:  suppose we try to understand the mind of a
serial killer.   What REAL, pragmatic, concrete, change can that bring
about?   Answer: nada.
The only thing "accomplished" here *may* be a bit of more "understanding",
but, in the final analysis, it won't accomplish anything *pragmatic* (except
to perhaps make us feel better that we are able to at least partially
understand some of it, which isn't very pragmatic!).

It's a bit Don Quixotic, I think.

I mean, for all the "analysis" I've tried to do of what went "wrong" with
our 30 year marriage, what has that really accomplished, at the end of the
day?     Very little.

The real answer to all of this, I believe ... is in the wind:
"...the answer, my friend, is blowin in the wind....."
Erin - 28 Jun 2008 23:03 GMT
> >>> Regarding the possible medical causes
> >>> that may have changed my DH's personality
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
> The real answer to all of this, I believe ... is in the wind:
> "...the answer, my friend, is blowin in the wind....."

Well, i can see why you like parables so much.
That's a very unscientific attitude; my response to your
query, what difference would it make?

If it's treatable or reversible, it will make all the
difference in the world.

Let me give you an example: let's say you have
a tumour or lesion which is pressing on the cranial
nerve and all kinds of strange things are happening;
if you remove it, then you will no longer have those
problems.

Another example: let's say you have a terrible pain
in the groin; you go to the dr. and an ultrasound shows
gall stones; you remove the gall stones, and you no longer
have the pain in the groin.

You get the picture;

Erin
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 03:28 GMT
>>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes
>>>>> that may have changed my DH's personality
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
> That's a very unscientific attitude; my response to your
> query, what difference would it make?

I am a scientist (engineer (EE), actually).   But I think you're seeking
some sort of miraculous scientific answer or explanation to something a bit
more complex here (a psychological behavior), and truth be told, I don't
believe there is any.

> If it's treatable or reversible, it will make all the difference in the
> world.

I don't think what we are talking about is.     You seem to assume the
explanation or "reason" lies in some sort of tidy mental health "box", and
is just compartmentalized like that, and that that's the answer.

> Let me give you an example: let's say you have
> a tumour or lesion which is pressing on the cranial
> nerve and all kinds of strange things are happening;
> if you remove it, then you will no longer have those
> problems.

But that's not the real situation here (IMHO).   The analogy is off.

> Another example: let's say you have a terrible pain
> in the groin; you go to the dr. and an ultrasound shows
> gall stones; you remove the gall stones, and you no longer
> have the pain in the groin.
>
> You get the picture;

Again, I don't think that's the real situation here, and the analogy seems
off.
tension_on_the_wire - 29 Jun 2008 04:06 GMT
On Jun 28, 7:28 pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

> > Well, i can see why you like parables so much.
> > That's a very unscientific attitude; my response to your
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> Again, I don't think that's the real situation here, and the analogy seems
> off.-

Forgive me for intruding.  I don't generally post here, but I do lurk,
and in following this conversation, it occurred to me to make an
observation.  You both have valid points of view, depending upon the
vantage point.

It is entirely appropriate to proactively attempt to solve any hint of
medical issue if you have sufficient evidence that it exists (whether
it plays a part in your or your DH's problems or not), but not because
it might explain everything wrong in the marriage.  You (Erin) should
do it because it is the right thing to do, medically, regardless.  It
is, however, as you say, Bill, not entirely appropriate or reasonable
to expect that even if all Erin's medical suspicions are correct, and
reversible, that they will be the magic bullet and solve what sound
like multiple and complex problems in your marriage.

Searching for these answers as possible contributors to the seeming
intractibility of the problems can also help one exorcise one's demons
and feel empowered to be doing something but that is a slippery
slope.  If one gets too caught up in it, one stands in danger of
allowing one's accountability to slip into finding something to blame
everything on.  And we most definitely live in a society which has
been well indoctrinated into the habit of finding something, anything,
to blame for one's problems.  We blame the tobacco companies for our
smoking habits.  We sue McDonald's for our obesity.  We blame the
pharmaceutical companies for our tendencies to show up in physician's
offices demanding a magic pill to cure EVERYTHING.  We are desperately
searching for the genes to blame addiction on, as well as obesity, and
just about every mental antisocial behaviour that can be defined.  We
blame television, music, video games, movies and teachers for our
children's conduct disorders, instead of stepping up as parents and
taking responsibility for raising our children as we should.  It is
inherent in our society, and it bears watching.

Even when you post, Erin, a long list of all the terrible stresses
that have taken place in your family over that period of time, and
they are no doubt terrible....to some extent what you are saying
is....see how stressful our life is, we cannot be expected to function
normally under stress.  But the truth of it is that we ALL live with
combinations and permutations of the same stresses, and some people
cope with it better than others.  The people that cope the best are
the ones that are able to say to themselves, "I don't care what or who
made these problems in my life, I am stronger than that, and I will
overcome".  But if one prefers to say "look at all the reasons we have
for our marriage to fail"...in a way that is a self-fulfilling
prophecy because the person's own attitude is somewhat preformed and
the act of overcoming is already sabotaged.  And so we come full
circle to the concept that the single most important attitude in
saving a marriage is to not ever give up and continue to strive to
overcome, but not let oneself be overwhelmed with all the reasons why
we might fail.

Keep up the search, Erin, but don't ever fool yourself into thinking
that it will absolve you from examining yourself and the part you play
in contributing to any type of problems in your life.  Be alert.

And please forgive me for sounding so preachy.

--tension
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 04:25 GMT
> On Jun 28, 7:28 pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 94 lines]
>
> --tension

We don't mind preachy in here.   :-)
Plus, some people could likely benefit from such (if their mind is open
enough.  :-)
Erin - 29 Jun 2008 12:07 GMT
> On Jun 28, 7:28�pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 89 lines]
>
> And please forgive me for sounding so preachy.

But it also depends on when the stresses take place, what kind,
and at what point of a person's life; e.g. going through grieving as
well as mid-life crisis and work stress, may make the person more
vulnerable to things like rage, affairs, medical problems, than at
other times of his life.  The AD withdrawals have been repeatedly
documented in the med literature to precipitate far greater outbursts,
such as murder, violence, suicides even in cases where the stress
in the person's life has not been so high, and only the medical
problem itself has been the sufficient cause.  It is indeed not black
and white
but it's also not multi-coloured as you suggest.  And that is
evidenced
but the abrupt change in personality since the AD withdrawal.

Erin

> --tension
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 18:59 GMT
>> On Jun 28, 7:28�pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net>
>> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 111 lines]
>>
>> --tension

You're still looking for a somewhat elusive medical "cause", as if 1) it
could be pinned down and identified and put in a box, and that 2) that would
answer this whole problem in the relationship (and with him) and between you
two.
Erin - 29 Jun 2008 19:05 GMT
> >> On Jun 28, 7:28�pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net>
> >> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 116 lines]
> answer this whole problem in the relationship (and with him) and between you
> two.

You're right of course; maybe it's the remnants of my happy university
days, when the library searches went on forever and yielded lots
of discoveries.  I think it became a habit.  It is in this case
irrelevant,
but life without meaning is rather dull.

Erin
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 19:32 GMT
>>>> On Jun 28, 7:28�pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net>
>>>> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 125 lines]
>
> Erin

Yes.   Yes it is.    :-(
(and btw, when I said I am an engineer (EE), I shoulda said, was an
engineer, but became a college teacher in that field (which was my real love
and passion), but am now sorta semi-retired.   Trouble is, idle hands are
the devil's workshop, or seem to be on some days.   :-)
tension_on_the_wire - 01 Jul 2008 04:40 GMT
> But it also depends on when the stresses take place, what kind,
> and at what point of a person's life; e.g. going through grieving as
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Erin

Well, I rest my case.  I don't know what you mean by multi-coloured,
but it seems your entire response to my post is to say that it is
completely irrelevant because you know that all the problems you are
having are due to his anti-depressant withdrawal and the stressful
events that occured in your life.  I'm sorry, but that, by definition,
is denial, and abdication of accountability.  It is also not very
realistic.

Let me tell you something about anti-depressant withdrawal.  The
withdrawal of any psychotropic drug is going to result in a period of
instability while the brain's chemicals re-equilibrate.  This is true
for any patient, and I had read the current literature that you claim
is "evidenced".  It is not, by any means, definitive on the subject of
who will respond in a negative way and who will come off just fine.
But, I assure you, the vast majority of patients who come off of anti-
depressants survive the experience and their families and lives are
intact afterwards.  The literature that suggests that there are some
patients who respond otherwise is extremely controversial and by no
means crystal clear.  And it is totally unestablished that these
patients with poor outcomes were not victims of the original
psychopathology that put them on the medication in the first place and
their behaviour may have had nothing to do with the drug or the
withdrawal.

There is no way for science to distinguish yet between the patient who
comes off of anti-depressant medication and has a bad reaction to the
withdrawal, from the patient who has a rebound resurgence of his
depressive symptoms.  The "personality change" you are attributing to
withdrawal, however, is only remotely possible as the vast majority of
reactions to withdrawal are only an increase of depression symptoms
and occasional suicide attempts, not personality changes.  It has been
established for many years in the field of psychology that it is
extremely difficult, if not impossible, to change the basic
personality of a human.

Bear in mind that it takes only a very few patients with a bad
reaction for the media to jump all over it and cause such a furor that
the pharmaceutical companies feel obliged to add a black box warning
on the drug.  But it is not very realistic for you to assume that this
is the magic bullet that, together with the "unique" sequence of bad
luck events in your lives just happened to hit the spot required to
turn your husband into someone incapable of controlling his actions or
knowing what he was doing.  None of these drugs, nor their
withdrawals, cause such psychosis that your husband can be said to be
unaware of his actions or incapable of stopping them.

Stresses occuring at vulnerable times, as you suggest in your post, DO
HAPPEN TO OTHER PEOPLE.  You seem to think that if the very same
occurences happened to someone else, that there is some math dictating
that they too would react in the same way as you and your husband
reacted.  This is simply not true.  If it were, the murder rates in
this country would be absolutely sky-high.  And I mean much higher
than they already are.  The reaction is not determined by outside
occurences multiplied by midlife crisis, etc.  The reaction is
determined by the sum total of that person's basic ability to adapt to
crisis...and that is determined partly by genetic makeup, accumulated
life-experience (including, but not limited to the stresses in one's
life), how one was raised as a child, one's moral and values paradigm,
and one's basic temperament or personality (which so far, science has
not been able to find a way to significantly change at all).

So whether you like it or not, the outcome is most definitely "multi-
coloured" as you call it.  Perhaps what you meant was "shades of gray"
or, more accurately....multifactorial.  It has long been established
that all of human behaviour is multifactorial and that there is no
quick explanation for anything in human psychology.  The fact that you
still insist that there is, is not really helpful for you or your
marriage.

--tension
Erin - 06 Jul 2008 18:40 GMT
> > But it also depends on when the stresses take place, what kind,
> > and at what point of a person's life; e.g. going through grieving as
[quoted text clipped - 82 lines]
>
> --tension

It was the meds -- record exists of tapering and lowering
dose upon the time of meeting OW; later down to 0-- people
can actually go psychotic or suicidal, as he did when completely
withdrawn.

It was the meds, it was the meds and it was sexual attraction and
frustration with with the wrong meds, that led to non-compliance;
however, that does not mean that he is now the same person on
account of it, even after having to go on the meds again; and
the reason for that is that he wanted to go off the meds for
personal reasons;  so one way or another, he is looking for
a new life.

Erin
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 19:10 GMT
> On Jun 28, 7:28 pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> observation.  You both have valid points of view, depending upon the
> vantage point.

Go for it.   :-)

> It is entirely appropriate to proactively attempt to solve any hint of
> medical issue if you have sufficient evidence that it exists (whether
> it plays a part in your or your DH's problems or not), but not because
> it might explain everything wrong in the marriage.

Right.

> You (Erin) should
> do it because it is the right thing to do, medically, regardless.  It
> is, however, as you say, Bill, not entirely appropriate or reasonable
> to expect that even if all Erin's medical suspicions are correct, and
> reversible, that they will be the magic bullet and solve what sound
> like multiple and complex problems in your marriage.

That's my point.

> Searching for these answers as possible contributors to the seeming
> intractibility of the problems can also help one exorcise one's demons
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> to blame for one's problems.  We blame the tobacco companies for our
> smoking habits.  We sue McDonald's for our obesity.

The people who do are complete IDIOTS.   And it is childish behavior.  I can
hear it now:   "I'm not responsible for that!    What??   You expect ME to
be responsible and accountable???    How dare you!!"    And so common for
many in the newage, ME ME ME times today.   (And - it was NOT always this
way;  fortunately I can still remember that far back, but that was many,
many, moons ago).

> We blame the
> pharmaceutical companies for our tendencies to show up in physician's
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> taking responsibility for raising our children as we should.  It is
> inherent in our society, and it bears watching.

Sigh.    (So it seems - *especially* THESE days).
(but, don't worry - we have an abundance of newage lawyers just chompin at
the bit, ready and willing to "help" sort it all out - snort)

> Even when you post, Erin, a long list of all the terrible stresses
> that have taken place in your family over that period of time, and
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> --tension

Seems like, overall, there are some pretty good observations in this post.
Doug Laidlaw - 29 Jun 2008 13:13 GMT
>>>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes
>>>>>> that may have changed my DH's personality
[quoted text clipped - 99 lines]
> Again, I don't think that's the real situation here, and the analogy seems
> off.

I should keep out of this, but I copped it from my wife.

Erin is trying to say: My husband has a definite medical problem.  Therefore
he is the cause of all my unhappiness.  Therefore I am quite justified in
playing "Poor Me!"

I suggest: if he has a definite medical problem, it can be a limitation.
But it won't solve anything.  You have depression; he has depression.  I
was diagnosed with depression at about 10, and I am now 65.  At times, it
has been very difficult for my wife.  But we are still together, because we
wanted to be.  We don't concentrate on the problem areas, we concentrate on
the things that bind us together.

If you like, depression is now a definite medical illness.  You both have
it.  But for how long?  Many people come out with it under stress, like
acne.  They get better when the stress goes away.

I still say: stop treating your husband like a specimen under a microscope
or worse, like a programmed robot, and start treating him like a human
being.  Accept him as he is, with his strengths and weaknesses.  See his
strengths more than his weaknesses.  Until you do that, you won't get
anywhere.

If you love him, let him go.  If he comes back, he is yours to keep, and to
treat as the precious jewel that each person is.  If he doesn't, you never
really had him anyway.  If you love him, read 1 Cor. 13.  Don't ask
yourself, "How does he show these signs of love?" but "How do I show them?"
Yourself is the only person you can work with.

Doug L.
Erin - 29 Jun 2008 15:23 GMT
> >>>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes
> >>>>>> that may have changed my DH's personality
[quoted text clipped - 130 lines]
>
> Doug L.

It's good advice Doug.  Thanks.

Erin
Erin - 29 Jun 2008 18:15 GMT
> > >>>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes
> > >>>>>> that may have changed my DH's personality
[quoted text clipped - 134 lines]
>
> Erin

I would like to add though, that I would have "let him go" in the
first
year, had he not misrepresented his true motives.
I always had an inkling that his depression was partly due to
an inherited conflict between what he wanted to do and what he
was raised in a morally strict way, to do.   I always found his
Kantian ethics and intolerance of human follies, a bit harsh.
I always told him that he might be happier if he would allow
a bit more liberty into his own life and principles.  People do
what they want after all in the end.  He hated it when i said that to
him.
There may be many people in his life whom he secretly holds
in contempt, including his own, and there may be others with
whom he feels free.  Perhaps, events presented an opportunity
for him to loosen the shackles of morality.  If that is the case,
then it's a good transition into self-awareness for him.  And
that has nothing to do with our troubled marriage, as the
OW rudely and presumtuously informed me.  Infact, it has nothing to do
with me.
It has something to do with his character.

Erin
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 19:21 GMT
>>>>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes
>>>>>>> that may have changed my DH's personality
[quoted text clipped - 103 lines]
>>
> I should keep out of this, but I copped it from my wife.

:-)

> Erin is trying to say: My husband has a definite medical problem.
> Therefore
> he is the cause of all my unhappiness.  Therefore I am quite justified in
> playing "Poor Me!"

Oh boy.....

> I suggest: if he has a definite medical problem, it can be a limitation.
> But it won't solve anything.

Exactly.

> You have depression; he has depression.  I
> was diagnosed with depression at about 10, and I am now 65.  At times, it
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> or worse, like a programmed robot, and start treating him like a human
> being.

Yeah, that's probably a good way to put it.

> Accept him as he is, with his strengths and weaknesses.  See his
> strengths more than his weaknesses.  Until you do that, you won't get
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> them?"
> Yourself is the only person you can work with.

If we can...
Erin - 29 Jun 2008 19:40 GMT
> >>>>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes
> >>>>>>> that may have changed my DH's personality
[quoted text clipped - 149 lines]
>
> If we can...

How come i have to do all the work and he can go scott-free
with no effort or acceptance of remorse?  I think that's sexist
at least, and unjust at most.  If he has no conscience, then
what is the use of me sweetening the pot?  And if you guys
refuse to accept the medical explanation, then there won't
be any kind of redemption further down the road.

Erin

Erin
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 19:50 GMT
>>>>>>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes
>>>>>>>>> that may have changed my DH's personality
[quoted text clipped - 157 lines]
> How come i have to do all the work and he can go scott-free
> with no effort or acceptance of remorse?

I didn't say that.
And no, it is not fair (assuming it even can be done).

> I think that's sexist at least, and unjust at most.

Sexist?   No!   (I was including myself in that statement, in case you
missed it).

> If he has no conscience, then
> what is the use of me sweetening the pot?

I'm not sure there is.
But I'm also not sure that he has "no" conscience, either, although the
statements presented here do seem to point in that direction.

> And if you guys refuse to accept the medical explanation,

That's looking for a magic bullet, IMO.

> then there won't be any kind of redemption further down the road.

I'm not sure how to answer this.
But maybe I can add this:
"...the path to salvation is as difficult to traverse as a razor's edge..."
(SM)
But I'm not sure that helps, however.
Michaela - 29 Jun 2008 21:29 GMT
And this helps you to move on exactly how?

- Michaela
> Regarding the possible medical causes
> that may have changed my DH's personality
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Erin

--
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 22:30 GMT
I don't see how it would.

> And this helps you to move on exactly how?
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> --
im906768@gmail.com - 30 Jun 2008 00:24 GMT
> I don't see how it would.
>
> > And this helps you to move on exactly how?
(well, in anyway i am trying to move on; counsellor
says we have a good marriage requiring cooperation).

On this topic,

My DH is making positive efforts to repair the
harm done to the marriage.  He helps me with
stuff, and talks about how our computers can
be set up when he returns.  I should be happy
but I find myself feeling apprehensive and anxious,
as if he is taking the pain i have gone through
for granted; i am afraid because it feels as if i have
managed to close a wound, and worry that it may
open again.

Is this a normal reaction, i wonder;
strange isn't it;

Erin
(sorry i have changed my subscription--
i am still Erin as posting in the past.)
Bill in Co - 30 Jun 2008 02:48 GMT
>> I don't see how it would.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> as if he is taking the pain i have gone through
> for granted;

Well, he may be.

> i am afraid because it feels as if i have
> managed to close a wound, and worry that it may
> open again.
>
> Is this a normal reaction, i wonder;

I expect it is.    It's often just part and parcel of the human condition.

> strange isn't it;

Indeed...

> Erin
> (sorry i have changed my subscription--
> i am still Erin as posting in the past.)
Spottles - 30 Jun 2008 11:34 GMT
> >> I don't see how it would.
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Indeed...

the counsellor thinks it can be done; don't even talk about
divorce-- in what she must have seen of marriages, the
probability of this one working out must be very high as she
is very optimistic; i am told to listen to the experts about this
and put my fears aside; again-- i have problems with the
issue of trust, but i think i have justification, given all that
has past; that's just the point the counsellor thinks-- it has
passed.  Cross my fingers, wish me luck and i hope we can
do this in the distant future rather than right away.

Erin

> > Erin
> > (sorry i have changed my subscription--
> > i am still Erin as posting in the past.)
Spottles - 30 Jun 2008 11:59 GMT
> > >> I don't see how it would.
> > >>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> passed.  Cross my fingers, wish me luck and i hope we can
> do this in the distant future rather than right away.

also, it's a stroke of good luck that my family respect the
opinions of marital experts and quite magnanimous, given
that the relations between my DH and them are now permanently
strained; he may have less to deal with during his recovery from
medical problems;

E

> Erin
> >
> > > Erin
> > > (sorry i have changed my subscription--
> > > i am still Erin as posting in the past.)
Joy - 30 Jun 2008 05:37 GMT
It doesn't help her move on.  Which I suppose is the point.

> And this helps you to move on exactly how?
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>
>> Erin
AllYou! - 30 Jun 2008 13:03 GMT
In
news:11ad2b53-15c1-43c1-a643-f1ffab6aa679@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com,
Erin <squiggle@sympatico.ca> mused:
> Regarding the possible medical causes
> that may have changed my DH's personality
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> with the marriage or me, but rather with the
> med withdrawal and accumulated stress.

So now you're back to looking for excuses for why you find yourself
where you are.
Spottles - 30 Jun 2008 13:19 GMT
> In
> news:11ad2b53-15c1-43c1-a643-f1ffab6aa679@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com,
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> So now you're back to looking for excuses for why you find yourself
> where you are.

AY, i don't have to look for excuses to find out why i am where
i am; i know why.

Erin
AllYou! - 30 Jun 2008 13:38 GMT
In
news:cf6e8ecd-d5be-42af-aaba-4745fe14ff3d@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com,
Spottles <im906768@gmail.com> mused:
>> In
>> news:11ad2b53-15c1-43c1-a643-f1ffab6aa679@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com,
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> AY, i don't have to look for excuses to find out why i am where
> i am; i know why.

Yet another handle?  It must be difficult to keep them all straight.
Spottles - 30 Jun 2008 17:12 GMT
> In
> news:cf6e8ecd-d5be-42af-aaba-4745fe14ff3d@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com,
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> Yet another handle?  It must be difficult to keep them all straight.

I already posted a notice that i am still Erin, though i have
opened a gmail account.  Have a nice day.

E
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.