Could this have been it?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Erin - 28 Jun 2008 13:55 GMT Regarding the possible medical causes that may have changed my DH's personality some four years ago... i found in my journal that on this one particular yr. not only were there many family deaths, sicknesses, and stressful events; not only was he taken off his AD down to 0 percipitating a suicide attempt, but prior to these he was actually given a mega mix of two meds which, i just looked up:
http://www.drugs.com/drug_interactions.php
Like I said, medications may have played a big role in his "out-of-character" behaviour. To show that I am not excusing this, I am not saying that I am not holding him responsible or that I do not feel that we have issues, but I am saying that many domestic crises are depression or medical problem-related. Certainly, the suicide attempt had nothing to do with the marriage or me, but rather with the med withdrawal and accumulated stress.
Erin
Erin - 28 Jun 2008 13:58 GMT > Regarding the possible medical causes > that may have changed my DH's personality [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Erin p.s. Excuse me for double-posting.... i just noticed that the drug interaction checker needs feeding when reposted: the drugs were 900mg lithium AND 300mg imipramine; the risk; mania and neuroleptic malignant syndrome, among others, within only a few days of taking it.
E
Erin - 28 Jun 2008 15:05 GMT > > Regarding the possible medical causes > > that may have changed my DH's personality [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > E NMS -
The symptoms i noticed developing was cognitive problems and daytime sleep attacks-- very unusual; here is another site on the Neuroleptic syndrome with lithium and tricyclics, of which imipramine is one. Encephalopathy is one the reactions which may be revrsible.
NEUROLEPTIC MALIGNANT SYNDROME
DEFINITION
A life-threatening idiosyncratic reaction characterized by muscle rigidity and hyperthermia, related to acute dopamine depletion, either from the use of neuroleptic drugs or of dopamine antagonists, or the withdrawal of dopamine agonists.
TOXIC CAUSES
Exposure to therapeutic doses of potent neuroleptic drugs (eg, haloperidol, fluphenazine) or the sudden cessation of dopamine agonists such as amantidine. Reported risk factors include dehydration and the concurrent use of lithium and tricyclic antidepressants.
..../from http://www.intox.org/databank/documents/treat/treate/trt37_e.htm ------------
E
Rog' - 28 Jun 2008 15:50 GMT > Regarding the possible medical causes that > may have changed my DH's personality... Many people with mind-altering medications and serious personal crises will engage in anti-social behavior, some will throw long-term relationships to the wind, some will spiral out of control, so you may be on to something. But in our society, we do not absolve people of responsibility for their behavior, unless they are criminally insane and cannot tell the diff. between right and wrong.
In my line of work (criminal law). I hear excuses from family and friends all the time. "If it weren't for the drugs" or "He needs help, not jail." Sorry, but even unintended actions have consequences, usually. But you keep letting him off the hook, or at least it seems so.
Bill in Co - 28 Jun 2008 21:49 GMT >> Regarding the possible medical causes that >> may have changed my DH's personality... [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > their behavior, unless they are criminally insane > and cannot tell the diff. between right and wrong. Really? Even today? We must be living on different planets.
> In my line of work (criminal law). I hear excuses > from family and friends all the time. "If it weren't > for the drugs" or "He needs help, not jail." EXACTLY. But then some lawyer WILL get them OFF, and pocket the change (translation: we'll split the proceeds with said "victim" (snort).
Speaking of which, how are the ambulance chasers making out these days? (rhetorical)
> Sorry, but even unintended actions have consequences, usually. Maybe usually. But there sure seems to be a hell of a lot of exceptions these days.
> But you keep letting him off the hook, or at least it seems so. She's looking for a "reason" or "explanation" as part of the grieving process. But truth be told, the answer lies in the wind.....
Doug Laidlaw - 29 Jun 2008 05:37 GMT >>> Regarding the possible medical causes that >>> may have changed my DH's personality... [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > She's looking for a "reason" or "explanation" as part of the grieving > process. But truth be told, the answer lies in the wind..... (Sorry to pinch your thread, Erin. I can only say to you what I have said before: forget about DH's motives. He is the only one who knows them. React instead to his actions. Rog' has probably heard the saying by an English Judge, "The Devil himself knoweth not the mind of man." And at least see him as a separate, responsible individual.)
Bill, I agree with Rog'. Every criminal (well, almost every one) has a motive. They all see themselves as doing "the right thing" by some standard, as they see it. In a sense, that is what moves them to do it. But our legal system can't allow that as an excuse. The law sets down a framework, and misfits are treated as criminals. I can use homosexuals as an example. Oscar Wilde got jail for being a homosexual. Nowadays, apart from the prejudiced people, we see homosexuals as either a different type of normal, or as sick, not criminals. We give "habitual drunkards" jail, when it isn't what they need.
But what they need and what they want are two different things. I represented a man who had previously shot dead one man, then took a dislike to a couple in my area, shot and wounded them both, then staged a typical "siege" or shootout. I mentioned to the prison psychiatrist that he needed help. The psychiatrist agreed, but said that he refused to take it. Our society won't force help on him, and appropriate help probably can't be forced anyway. All that we could do with him was treat him as he wanted to be treated, a rational, deliberate criminal.
I think that you have made the remark about defence lawyers before. I agree that it seems wrong, and if people are regularly getting off when they shouldn't be, the system needs to be changed. In some countries, prosecutors are like your concept of defence lawyers. They are there to get a conviction, by fair means or foul. But to deal with the accused appropriately, the Judge and jury need to hear everything that can be said on his behalf. If the law has loopholes, the accused may have breached the intent of the law, but he hasn't breached the law itself. I have seen the opposite: the accused did something that should be punished, but he didn't breach a known law, so they brought in the nearest they could find. Police magistrates are most likely to give "bush justice" and to go for that kind of thing. The Judges have always said that patching up loopholes is not their job, but Parliament's.
Doug L. Solicitor, Victoria, Australia.
Erin - 29 Jun 2008 12:15 GMT > >>> Regarding the possible medical causes that > >>> may have changed my DH's personality... [quoted text clipped - 71 lines] > Doug L. > Solicitor, Victoria, Australia. I think you have the greatest amount of common sense here; a tad cynical i suppose in light of my wild optimism. I'm not sure i like to compare this case to a criminal one-- not yet-- lol -- just kidding really, but the point about everything being clear and the looholes providing miscarriages of "justice" are valid points. And in the realm of human interaction, every man has his own secrets and goals in life which may not be made transparent to those who may oppose them. I suppose that is the price of freedom, and i don't think it's a bad thing at all. If you are religious, you can say, it is not up to you to judge a man but to the Lord ultimately. If not, perhaps, up to the man's own conscience and nobody else's.
Erin
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 18:40 GMT >>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes that >>>>> may have changed my DH's personality... [quoted text clipped - 102 lines] > > Erin Trouble is, a lot of people obviously don't have a conscience.
phelbooth - 29 Jun 2008 18:54 GMT On Jun 29, 12:40 pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes that > >>>>> may have changed my DH's personality... [quoted text clipped - 104 lines] > > Trouble is, a lot of people obviously don't have a conscience. What is a conscience?
Erin - 29 Jun 2008 19:20 GMT > On Jun 29, 12:40 pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 109 lines] > > What is a conscience? In short, internalized rules of behaviour, learned early and reinforced through social habit-- that's what i think it is.
Here is is a link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscience
Erin
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 19:34 GMT > On Jun 29, 12:40 pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 118 lines] > > What is a conscience? Exactly. :-) Wanna know the real answer here? The answer to that is just "...blowin in the wind...", my friend.
AllYou! - 30 Jun 2008 14:20 GMT >> What is a conscience? > > Exactly. :-) > Wanna know the real answer here? > The answer to that is just "...blowin in the wind...", my friend. Can't you ever contribute anything of substance? Anything at all, 'lil Fraudo?
Bill in Co - 30 Jun 2008 19:07 GMT >>> What is a conscience? >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Can't you ever contribute anything of substance? Anything at all, > 'lil Fraudo? I realize that that parable is a bit above your paygrade, grasshopper. But I'm sorry, I really can't help you with that.
AllYou! - 30 Jun 2008 19:20 GMT AllYou! - 30 Jun 2008 14:19 GMT > Trouble is, a lot of people obviously don't have a conscience. Like you do? LOL!!!!!!!
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 19:18 GMT >>>> Regarding the possible medical causes that >>>> may have changed my DH's personality... [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > motive. They all see themselves as doing "the right thing" by some > standard, as they see it. In a sense, that is what moves them to do it. I don't think they see anything. They just grap what they want, and say "screw the consequences if I can get away with it!". "It's all about ME ME ME, and MY instant gratification, and f.ck everybody else".
They don't see it as "doing the right thing". They're too stupid and inconsiderate.
> But our legal system can't allow that as an excuse. The law sets down a > framework, and misfits are treated as criminals. I can use homosexuals as [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > can't be forced anyway. All that we could do with him was treat him as he > wanted to be treated, a rational, deliberate criminal. Help him? He needs to be locked up. You say that isn't what he needs? Actually, it IS, because there is no other REAL alternative. (You can't reform them anyways, so it's a moot point).
> I think that you have made the remark about defence lawyers before. I > agree > that it seems wrong, and if people are regularly getting off when they > shouldn't be, the system needs to be changed. It ain't gonna happen. (Such systemic problems are rarely really resolved, just patched. We plug up the leaks with chewing gum). The political will, AND follow through, just ain't there.
> In some countries, > prosecutors are like your concept of defence lawyers. They are there to [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Doug L. > Solicitor, Victoria, Australia. Doug Laidlaw - 29 Jun 2008 05:47 GMT > But in our society, > we do not absolve people of responsibility for > their behavior, unless they are criminally insane > and cannot tell the diff. between right and wrong. Do you still have the M'Naghten Rules, then?
Doug L.
Rog' - 29 Jun 2008 12:50 GMT >> But in our society, we do not absolve people of >> responsibility for their behavior, unless they are >> criminally insane and cannot tell the diff. between >> right and wrong.
> Do you still have the M'Naghten Rules, then? Yep. Most states, although a few adopted a more liberal "mental defect" rule.
The point to Erin: You want an explanation for his behavior? No matter how whacked out he may have been, your DH still possessed the free will to choose between good or evil. That's mine. But this begs the question: "Do you want to live with someone who would treat you this way?"
Erin - 29 Jun 2008 13:23 GMT > >> But in our society, we do not absolve people of > >> responsibility for their behavior, unless they are [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > this begs the question: "Do you want to live with > someone who would treat you this way?" Well, as i said earlier, just a few posts above, the moral stability of a person can vary according to circumstances. So that a man may be capable of something he would later regret due to any number of unusual stormy aspects of his life and his mental state. Unless he is born to be perpetually in a state of rage or homocidal mania ( a very unlikely condition in the worst of cases ) an act which is "out of character" will occur at some point in a person's life and not every day or month or year. So free will does exist even in the grips of unusual mental states, but it is free in degrees of compulsion and stresses. I think a lot of philosophers speak of free will as if it is a metaphysical entity when it is really a description of transient and limited states of volition.
As for "treating me this way"-- it is precisely because of the unusual and sudden change of treatment for a short period of time, that I propose the medical stressors as depriving the will to act according to typical behaviour not only regarding me, but other people as well, and also himself. It should also be take into account, that after the AD was reinstated the behaviour turned to the previous typical character and values. So, this is an example of the inconstancy of free will, according to the effect of extreme changes in the brain.
Erin
Rog' - 29 Jun 2008 20:19 GMT > As for "treating me this way"-- it is precisely because > of the unusual and sudden change of treatment for [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > inconstancy of free will, according to the effect of extreme > changes in the brain. ------------ I believe that often, a medical crisis or other trauma reveals what is at the core of a person's soul. It strips away the face we show the world, our veneer and, without that contraint, our true self is uncovered. My theory anyway.
Erin - 29 Jun 2008 20:45 GMT > > As for "treating me this way"-- it is precisely because > > of the unusual and sudden change of treatment for [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > we show the world, our veneer and, without that contraint, > our true self is uncovered. My theory anyway. That has actually crossed my mind very often; but it is hard to confirm, as emotions are distorted under medical crises-- on the other hand they may also be revealed;
Erin
Lauri - 30 Jun 2008 01:17 GMT >I believe that often, a medical crisis or other trauma reveals >what is at the core of a person's soul. It strips away the face >we show the world, our veneer and, without that contraint, >our true self is uncovered. My theory anyway. Similar to how I feel that alcohol reveals a person's true character!
 Signature Lauri in WA
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 19:11 GMT >>> But in our society, we do not absolve people of >>> responsibility for their behavior, unless they are [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > this begs the question: "Do you want to live with > someone who would treat you this way?" Given the alternative, clearly yes. Hello?
pennyshiny123@gmail.com - 28 Jun 2008 17:01 GMT > Regarding the possible medical causes > that may have changed my DH's personality [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Erin What year was it, Erin?
I confess, out of boredom (and also interest), I went back and read through all your posts to ASM since 2000. Back in 2000-2002 timeframe, you would often post about:
1) your lack of interest in sex, and belief that it wasn't important in a marriage 2) your DH and you both spending too much time on the computer (you even mentioned your DH was getting fat, because of the lack of exercise.
Throughout this period, you seemed happy and in love and content with your marriage.
Then from 2002-2007 (approx) we didn't hear much from you (unless you were using another nym). Is this when everything happened?
I'm just wondering if perhaps it wasn't some medical/mental health crisis that set it all off with your DH? Perhaps items #1 and #2 had more to do with your drifting apart?
You wouldn't be the first marriage that becomes vulnerable to an affair because the couple neglects each other, spending less time together, and there is a discrepancy between sex drives.
Could it be that your DH missed the sex?
There was also a post in which you said that you were okay with your spouse cheating, provided he did it discretely.
Anyway, I hope you don't consider that stalking.... I sometimes go back through my own posts because memory does have a way of revising itself.
jen
Erin - 28 Jun 2008 18:15 GMT pennyshiny...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Regarding the possible medical causes > > that may have changed my DH's personality [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > > jen Yes problems started around 2000-2007:
- family suicide - father death and horrible illness - mother death and horrible stroke - many pet deaths - medication mistakes leading to serious problems - suicide attempts (hanging) - stress at work - house management problems - broken leg injury - estate headaches - another death in the family - heart attack in family - recent problem with marital break - neurological or tinnitus problem coming up
-- through it all i would say lithium has saved me and kept me remarkably stable given the problems we had to deal with and solve. To give my DH credit through it all he never stopped working and tried his best. I think we deserve a medal from NAMI :-).
All deaths required a lot of work on our part, very stressful; drug problems were hardly conducive to high sex urge with all the business; but that was not a problem with the organs or libido, but just a really stressful life;
In my opinion life would have been much easier had he (and me at some points) the attention of a psychiatrist with psychopharmacological expertise. I bet you did not see my posts at benzo.org-- that is when i started using the computer at home.
as for looking at my posts -- well, make of them what you will -- i think everyone posts now.
Erin
Erin - 28 Jun 2008 20:03 GMT > pennyshiny...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Regarding the possible medical causes [quoted text clipped - 99 lines] > > Erin p.s. I forgot to mention the Ice Storm, which shut the city down and we had to rescue a blind relative through icy streets covered with downed trees and debris to get to a local Shelter;
-and about sex, which seems to have struck your interest within the context of so many other problems, imipramine inhibits libido; nevertheless we never had serious problems in this area if it were not for the stressful years (married 30 yrs.).
- the benzo problem lasted 15 years and gave me panic attacks throughout, every single day, until i joined the benzo group and discovered i had become addicted.
- i don't feel bitter because things are turning out well, and there are many people who have lost their lives to an overwhelmed and corporate medical climate, esp. in pharmaceutical proliferation. I don't blame the doctors. I do blame the drug companies for not being more ethical and responsible, investing their money of clinics and pragmatic analysis of their products' effects.
Erin
Bill in Co - 28 Jun 2008 21:40 GMT >> pennyshiny...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> Regarding the possible medical causes [quoted text clipped - 121 lines] > > Erin I don't think it's right to blame the drug companies, EXCEPT for their contrived high prices, and their trying to prevent us now from getting cheaper prescription drugs and generics from outside of the USA. (You know, as if the FDA protection label really means a hell of a lot. (See, they're just out to "protect us"!) (snort)
YooperBoyka - 29 Jun 2008 04:11 GMT > p.s. I forgot to mention the Ice Storm,... Jesus,...the hell with usenet,...you really need to call Jerry Springer. You're sittin' on a gold mine.
Doug Laidlaw - 29 Jun 2008 13:14 GMT >> p.s. I forgot to mention the Ice Storm,... > > Jesus,...the hell with usenet,...you really need to call Jerry Springer. > You're sittin' on a gold mine. It is better than my "Gulf War Virus."
Doug L.
also kato - 29 Jun 2008 04:21 GMT > p.s. I forgot to mention the Ice Storm, which shut the city down and > we had to rescue a blind relative through icy streets covered with > downed trees and debris to get to a local Shelter; Sounds like the Montreal ice storm of January 1998, but it can't be that because you said ALL your problems started in 2000
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 04:31 GMT >> p.s. I forgot to mention the Ice Storm, which shut the city down and >> we had to rescue a blind relative through icy streets covered with >> downed trees and debris to get to a local Shelter; > > Sounds like the Montreal ice storm of January 1998, but it can't be > that because you said ALL your problems started in 2000
:-) (And blaming the ice storm is NOT the answer. :-) (And besides which, you can't sue the ice storm - at least not as of yet). But, give it time, and I wouldn't be surprised at all if some scumbag lawyers wouldn't just chomp at the bit, and jump up and take on the case for $$$)
Bill in Co - 28 Jun 2008 21:43 GMT > Regarding the possible medical causes > that may have changed my DH's personality [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Erin I guess it helps to keep trying to find a "cause" for all this, Erin. At least it is part of the grieving process. But in reality, I'm not so sure it will help. :-(
Erin - 28 Jun 2008 22:05 GMT > > Regarding the possible medical causes > > that may have changed my DH's personality [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > least it is part of the grieving process. But in reality, I'm not so > sure it will help. :-( I was hoping that with the recent hearing of voices and musical tunes repetitively, it would come to the point where a referral to a neurologist or autologist would reveal something more than a blood test could. He has been seeming odd and ill since about four yrs. ago, when i thought Serzone might have affected the liver-- that seems unikely now, so maybe a head injury? a medical problem? Surely, there must be a way of investigating these symptoms.
I am curious to know why you thing that trying to find a "cause" will not help;
Erin
Bill in Co - 28 Jun 2008 22:19 GMT >>> Regarding the possible medical causes >>> that may have changed my DH's personality [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > > Erin Because trying to find some sort of "explanation" for it won't change anything (from what I can see). It's just an exercise in trying to understand something.
Here is a far out example: suppose we try to understand the mind of a serial killer. What REAL, pragmatic, concrete, change can that bring about? Answer: nada. The only thing "accomplished" here *may* be a bit of more "understanding", but, in the final analysis, it won't accomplish anything *pragmatic* (except to perhaps make us feel better that we are able to at least partially understand some of it, which isn't very pragmatic!).
It's a bit Don Quixotic, I think.
I mean, for all the "analysis" I've tried to do of what went "wrong" with our 30 year marriage, what has that really accomplished, at the end of the day? Very little.
The real answer to all of this, I believe ... is in the wind: "...the answer, my friend, is blowin in the wind....."
Erin - 28 Jun 2008 23:03 GMT > >>> Regarding the possible medical causes > >>> that may have changed my DH's personality [quoted text clipped - 61 lines] > The real answer to all of this, I believe ... is in the wind: > "...the answer, my friend, is blowin in the wind....." Well, i can see why you like parables so much. That's a very unscientific attitude; my response to your query, what difference would it make?
If it's treatable or reversible, it will make all the difference in the world.
Let me give you an example: let's say you have a tumour or lesion which is pressing on the cranial nerve and all kinds of strange things are happening; if you remove it, then you will no longer have those problems.
Another example: let's say you have a terrible pain in the groin; you go to the dr. and an ultrasound shows gall stones; you remove the gall stones, and you no longer have the pain in the groin.
You get the picture;
Erin
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 03:28 GMT >>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes >>>>> that may have changed my DH's personality [quoted text clipped - 69 lines] > That's a very unscientific attitude; my response to your > query, what difference would it make? I am a scientist (engineer (EE), actually). But I think you're seeking some sort of miraculous scientific answer or explanation to something a bit more complex here (a psychological behavior), and truth be told, I don't believe there is any.
> If it's treatable or reversible, it will make all the difference in the > world. I don't think what we are talking about is. You seem to assume the explanation or "reason" lies in some sort of tidy mental health "box", and is just compartmentalized like that, and that that's the answer.
> Let me give you an example: let's say you have > a tumour or lesion which is pressing on the cranial > nerve and all kinds of strange things are happening; > if you remove it, then you will no longer have those > problems. But that's not the real situation here (IMHO). The analogy is off.
> Another example: let's say you have a terrible pain > in the groin; you go to the dr. and an ultrasound shows > gall stones; you remove the gall stones, and you no longer > have the pain in the groin. > > You get the picture; Again, I don't think that's the real situation here, and the analogy seems off.
tension_on_the_wire - 29 Jun 2008 04:06 GMT On Jun 28, 7:28 pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > Well, i can see why you like parables so much. > > That's a very unscientific attitude; my response to your [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > Again, I don't think that's the real situation here, and the analogy seems > off.- Forgive me for intruding. I don't generally post here, but I do lurk, and in following this conversation, it occurred to me to make an observation. You both have valid points of view, depending upon the vantage point.
It is entirely appropriate to proactively attempt to solve any hint of medical issue if you have sufficient evidence that it exists (whether it plays a part in your or your DH's problems or not), but not because it might explain everything wrong in the marriage. You (Erin) should do it because it is the right thing to do, medically, regardless. It is, however, as you say, Bill, not entirely appropriate or reasonable to expect that even if all Erin's medical suspicions are correct, and reversible, that they will be the magic bullet and solve what sound like multiple and complex problems in your marriage.
Searching for these answers as possible contributors to the seeming intractibility of the problems can also help one exorcise one's demons and feel empowered to be doing something but that is a slippery slope. If one gets too caught up in it, one stands in danger of allowing one's accountability to slip into finding something to blame everything on. And we most definitely live in a society which has been well indoctrinated into the habit of finding something, anything, to blame for one's problems. We blame the tobacco companies for our smoking habits. We sue McDonald's for our obesity. We blame the pharmaceutical companies for our tendencies to show up in physician's offices demanding a magic pill to cure EVERYTHING. We are desperately searching for the genes to blame addiction on, as well as obesity, and just about every mental antisocial behaviour that can be defined. We blame television, music, video games, movies and teachers for our children's conduct disorders, instead of stepping up as parents and taking responsibility for raising our children as we should. It is inherent in our society, and it bears watching.
Even when you post, Erin, a long list of all the terrible stresses that have taken place in your family over that period of time, and they are no doubt terrible....to some extent what you are saying is....see how stressful our life is, we cannot be expected to function normally under stress. But the truth of it is that we ALL live with combinations and permutations of the same stresses, and some people cope with it better than others. The people that cope the best are the ones that are able to say to themselves, "I don't care what or who made these problems in my life, I am stronger than that, and I will overcome". But if one prefers to say "look at all the reasons we have for our marriage to fail"...in a way that is a self-fulfilling prophecy because the person's own attitude is somewhat preformed and the act of overcoming is already sabotaged. And so we come full circle to the concept that the single most important attitude in saving a marriage is to not ever give up and continue to strive to overcome, but not let oneself be overwhelmed with all the reasons why we might fail.
Keep up the search, Erin, but don't ever fool yourself into thinking that it will absolve you from examining yourself and the part you play in contributing to any type of problems in your life. Be alert.
And please forgive me for sounding so preachy.
--tension
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 04:25 GMT > On Jun 28, 7:28 pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 94 lines] > > --tension We don't mind preachy in here. :-) Plus, some people could likely benefit from such (if their mind is open enough. :-)
Erin - 29 Jun 2008 12:07 GMT > On Jun 28, 7:28�pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 89 lines] > > And please forgive me for sounding so preachy. But it also depends on when the stresses take place, what kind, and at what point of a person's life; e.g. going through grieving as well as mid-life crisis and work stress, may make the person more vulnerable to things like rage, affairs, medical problems, than at other times of his life. The AD withdrawals have been repeatedly documented in the med literature to precipitate far greater outbursts, such as murder, violence, suicides even in cases where the stress in the person's life has not been so high, and only the medical problem itself has been the sufficient cause. It is indeed not black and white but it's also not multi-coloured as you suggest. And that is evidenced but the abrupt change in personality since the AD withdrawal.
Erin
> --tension Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 18:59 GMT >> On Jun 28, 7:28�pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net> >> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 111 lines] >> >> --tension You're still looking for a somewhat elusive medical "cause", as if 1) it could be pinned down and identified and put in a box, and that 2) that would answer this whole problem in the relationship (and with him) and between you two.
Erin - 29 Jun 2008 19:05 GMT > >> On Jun 28, 7:28�pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net> > >> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 116 lines] > answer this whole problem in the relationship (and with him) and between you > two. You're right of course; maybe it's the remnants of my happy university days, when the library searches went on forever and yielded lots of discoveries. I think it became a habit. It is in this case irrelevant, but life without meaning is rather dull.
Erin
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 19:32 GMT >>>> On Jun 28, 7:28�pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net> >>>> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 125 lines] > > Erin Yes. Yes it is. :-( (and btw, when I said I am an engineer (EE), I shoulda said, was an engineer, but became a college teacher in that field (which was my real love and passion), but am now sorta semi-retired. Trouble is, idle hands are the devil's workshop, or seem to be on some days. :-)
tension_on_the_wire - 01 Jul 2008 04:40 GMT > But it also depends on when the stresses take place, what kind, > and at what point of a person's life; e.g. going through grieving as [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Erin Well, I rest my case. I don't know what you mean by multi-coloured, but it seems your entire response to my post is to say that it is completely irrelevant because you know that all the problems you are having are due to his anti-depressant withdrawal and the stressful events that occured in your life. I'm sorry, but that, by definition, is denial, and abdication of accountability. It is also not very realistic.
Let me tell you something about anti-depressant withdrawal. The withdrawal of any psychotropic drug is going to result in a period of instability while the brain's chemicals re-equilibrate. This is true for any patient, and I had read the current literature that you claim is "evidenced". It is not, by any means, definitive on the subject of who will respond in a negative way and who will come off just fine. But, I assure you, the vast majority of patients who come off of anti- depressants survive the experience and their families and lives are intact afterwards. The literature that suggests that there are some patients who respond otherwise is extremely controversial and by no means crystal clear. And it is totally unestablished that these patients with poor outcomes were not victims of the original psychopathology that put them on the medication in the first place and their behaviour may have had nothing to do with the drug or the withdrawal.
There is no way for science to distinguish yet between the patient who comes off of anti-depressant medication and has a bad reaction to the withdrawal, from the patient who has a rebound resurgence of his depressive symptoms. The "personality change" you are attributing to withdrawal, however, is only remotely possible as the vast majority of reactions to withdrawal are only an increase of depression symptoms and occasional suicide attempts, not personality changes. It has been established for many years in the field of psychology that it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to change the basic personality of a human.
Bear in mind that it takes only a very few patients with a bad reaction for the media to jump all over it and cause such a furor that the pharmaceutical companies feel obliged to add a black box warning on the drug. But it is not very realistic for you to assume that this is the magic bullet that, together with the "unique" sequence of bad luck events in your lives just happened to hit the spot required to turn your husband into someone incapable of controlling his actions or knowing what he was doing. None of these drugs, nor their withdrawals, cause such psychosis that your husband can be said to be unaware of his actions or incapable of stopping them.
Stresses occuring at vulnerable times, as you suggest in your post, DO HAPPEN TO OTHER PEOPLE. You seem to think that if the very same occurences happened to someone else, that there is some math dictating that they too would react in the same way as you and your husband reacted. This is simply not true. If it were, the murder rates in this country would be absolutely sky-high. And I mean much higher than they already are. The reaction is not determined by outside occurences multiplied by midlife crisis, etc. The reaction is determined by the sum total of that person's basic ability to adapt to crisis...and that is determined partly by genetic makeup, accumulated life-experience (including, but not limited to the stresses in one's life), how one was raised as a child, one's moral and values paradigm, and one's basic temperament or personality (which so far, science has not been able to find a way to significantly change at all).
So whether you like it or not, the outcome is most definitely "multi- coloured" as you call it. Perhaps what you meant was "shades of gray" or, more accurately....multifactorial. It has long been established that all of human behaviour is multifactorial and that there is no quick explanation for anything in human psychology. The fact that you still insist that there is, is not really helpful for you or your marriage.
--tension
Erin - 06 Jul 2008 18:40 GMT > > But it also depends on when the stresses take place, what kind, > > and at what point of a person's life; e.g. going through grieving as [quoted text clipped - 82 lines] > > --tension It was the meds -- record exists of tapering and lowering dose upon the time of meeting OW; later down to 0-- people can actually go psychotic or suicidal, as he did when completely withdrawn.
It was the meds, it was the meds and it was sexual attraction and frustration with with the wrong meds, that led to non-compliance; however, that does not mean that he is now the same person on account of it, even after having to go on the meds again; and the reason for that is that he wanted to go off the meds for personal reasons; so one way or another, he is looking for a new life.
Erin
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 19:10 GMT > On Jun 28, 7:28 pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@earthlink.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > observation. You both have valid points of view, depending upon the > vantage point. Go for it. :-)
> It is entirely appropriate to proactively attempt to solve any hint of > medical issue if you have sufficient evidence that it exists (whether > it plays a part in your or your DH's problems or not), but not because > it might explain everything wrong in the marriage. Right.
> You (Erin) should > do it because it is the right thing to do, medically, regardless. It > is, however, as you say, Bill, not entirely appropriate or reasonable > to expect that even if all Erin's medical suspicions are correct, and > reversible, that they will be the magic bullet and solve what sound > like multiple and complex problems in your marriage. That's my point.
> Searching for these answers as possible contributors to the seeming > intractibility of the problems can also help one exorcise one's demons [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > to blame for one's problems. We blame the tobacco companies for our > smoking habits. We sue McDonald's for our obesity. The people who do are complete IDIOTS. And it is childish behavior. I can hear it now: "I'm not responsible for that! What?? You expect ME to be responsible and accountable??? How dare you!!" And so common for many in the newage, ME ME ME times today. (And - it was NOT always this way; fortunately I can still remember that far back, but that was many, many, moons ago).
> We blame the > pharmaceutical companies for our tendencies to show up in physician's [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > taking responsibility for raising our children as we should. It is > inherent in our society, and it bears watching. Sigh. (So it seems - *especially* THESE days). (but, don't worry - we have an abundance of newage lawyers just chompin at the bit, ready and willing to "help" sort it all out - snort)
> Even when you post, Erin, a long list of all the terrible stresses > that have taken place in your family over that period of time, and [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > --tension Seems like, overall, there are some pretty good observations in this post.
Doug Laidlaw - 29 Jun 2008 13:13 GMT >>>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes >>>>>> that may have changed my DH's personality [quoted text clipped - 99 lines] > Again, I don't think that's the real situation here, and the analogy seems > off. I should keep out of this, but I copped it from my wife.
Erin is trying to say: My husband has a definite medical problem. Therefore he is the cause of all my unhappiness. Therefore I am quite justified in playing "Poor Me!"
I suggest: if he has a definite medical problem, it can be a limitation. But it won't solve anything. You have depression; he has depression. I was diagnosed with depression at about 10, and I am now 65. At times, it has been very difficult for my wife. But we are still together, because we wanted to be. We don't concentrate on the problem areas, we concentrate on the things that bind us together.
If you like, depression is now a definite medical illness. You both have it. But for how long? Many people come out with it under stress, like acne. They get better when the stress goes away.
I still say: stop treating your husband like a specimen under a microscope or worse, like a programmed robot, and start treating him like a human being. Accept him as he is, with his strengths and weaknesses. See his strengths more than his weaknesses. Until you do that, you won't get anywhere.
If you love him, let him go. If he comes back, he is yours to keep, and to treat as the precious jewel that each person is. If he doesn't, you never really had him anyway. If you love him, read 1 Cor. 13. Don't ask yourself, "How does he show these signs of love?" but "How do I show them?" Yourself is the only person you can work with.
Doug L.
Erin - 29 Jun 2008 15:23 GMT > >>>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes > >>>>>> that may have changed my DH's personality [quoted text clipped - 130 lines] > > Doug L. It's good advice Doug. Thanks.
Erin
Erin - 29 Jun 2008 18:15 GMT > > >>>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes > > >>>>>> that may have changed my DH's personality [quoted text clipped - 134 lines] > > Erin I would like to add though, that I would have "let him go" in the first year, had he not misrepresented his true motives. I always had an inkling that his depression was partly due to an inherited conflict between what he wanted to do and what he was raised in a morally strict way, to do. I always found his Kantian ethics and intolerance of human follies, a bit harsh. I always told him that he might be happier if he would allow a bit more liberty into his own life and principles. People do what they want after all in the end. He hated it when i said that to him. There may be many people in his life whom he secretly holds in contempt, including his own, and there may be others with whom he feels free. Perhaps, events presented an opportunity for him to loosen the shackles of morality. If that is the case, then it's a good transition into self-awareness for him. And that has nothing to do with our troubled marriage, as the OW rudely and presumtuously informed me. Infact, it has nothing to do with me. It has something to do with his character.
Erin
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 19:21 GMT >>>>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes >>>>>>> that may have changed my DH's personality [quoted text clipped - 103 lines] >> > I should keep out of this, but I copped it from my wife.
:-)
> Erin is trying to say: My husband has a definite medical problem. > Therefore > he is the cause of all my unhappiness. Therefore I am quite justified in > playing "Poor Me!" Oh boy.....
> I suggest: if he has a definite medical problem, it can be a limitation. > But it won't solve anything. Exactly.
> You have depression; he has depression. I > was diagnosed with depression at about 10, and I am now 65. At times, it [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > or worse, like a programmed robot, and start treating him like a human > being. Yeah, that's probably a good way to put it.
> Accept him as he is, with his strengths and weaknesses. See his > strengths more than his weaknesses. Until you do that, you won't get [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > them?" > Yourself is the only person you can work with. If we can...
Erin - 29 Jun 2008 19:40 GMT > >>>>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes > >>>>>>> that may have changed my DH's personality [quoted text clipped - 149 lines] > > If we can... How come i have to do all the work and he can go scott-free with no effort or acceptance of remorse? I think that's sexist at least, and unjust at most. If he has no conscience, then what is the use of me sweetening the pot? And if you guys refuse to accept the medical explanation, then there won't be any kind of redemption further down the road.
Erin
Erin
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 19:50 GMT >>>>>>>>> Regarding the possible medical causes >>>>>>>>> that may have changed my DH's personality [quoted text clipped - 157 lines] > How come i have to do all the work and he can go scott-free > with no effort or acceptance of remorse? I didn't say that. And no, it is not fair (assuming it even can be done).
> I think that's sexist at least, and unjust at most. Sexist? No! (I was including myself in that statement, in case you missed it).
> If he has no conscience, then > what is the use of me sweetening the pot? I'm not sure there is. But I'm also not sure that he has "no" conscience, either, although the statements presented here do seem to point in that direction.
> And if you guys refuse to accept the medical explanation, That's looking for a magic bullet, IMO.
> then there won't be any kind of redemption further down the road. I'm not sure how to answer this. But maybe I can add this: "...the path to salvation is as difficult to traverse as a razor's edge..." (SM) But I'm not sure that helps, however.
Michaela - 29 Jun 2008 21:29 GMT And this helps you to move on exactly how?
- Michaela
> Regarding the possible medical causes > that may have changed my DH's personality [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Erin --
Bill in Co - 29 Jun 2008 22:30 GMT I don't see how it would.
> And this helps you to move on exactly how? > [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > -- im906768@gmail.com - 30 Jun 2008 00:24 GMT > I don't see how it would. > > > And this helps you to move on exactly how? (well, in anyway i am trying to move on; counsellor says we have a good marriage requiring cooperation).
On this topic,
My DH is making positive efforts to repair the harm done to the marriage. He helps me with stuff, and talks about how our computers can be set up when he returns. I should be happy but I find myself feeling apprehensive and anxious, as if he is taking the pain i have gone through for granted; i am afraid because it feels as if i have managed to close a wound, and worry that it may open again.
Is this a normal reaction, i wonder; strange isn't it;
Erin (sorry i have changed my subscription-- i am still Erin as posting in the past.)
Bill in Co - 30 Jun 2008 02:48 GMT >> I don't see how it would. >> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > as if he is taking the pain i have gone through > for granted; Well, he may be.
> i am afraid because it feels as if i have > managed to close a wound, and worry that it may > open again. > > Is this a normal reaction, i wonder; I expect it is. It's often just part and parcel of the human condition.
> strange isn't it; Indeed...
> Erin > (sorry i have changed my subscription-- > i am still Erin as posting in the past.) Spottles - 30 Jun 2008 11:34 GMT > >> I don't see how it would. > >> [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > Indeed... the counsellor thinks it can be done; don't even talk about divorce-- in what she must have seen of marriages, the probability of this one working out must be very high as she is very optimistic; i am told to listen to the experts about this and put my fears aside; again-- i have problems with the issue of trust, but i think i have justification, given all that has past; that's just the point the counsellor thinks-- it has passed. Cross my fingers, wish me luck and i hope we can do this in the distant future rather than right away.
Erin
> > Erin > > (sorry i have changed my subscription-- > > i am still Erin as posting in the past.) Spottles - 30 Jun 2008 11:59 GMT > > >> I don't see how it would. > > >> [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > passed. Cross my fingers, wish me luck and i hope we can > do this in the distant future rather than right away. also, it's a stroke of good luck that my family respect the opinions of marital experts and quite magnanimous, given that the relations between my DH and them are now permanently strained; he may have less to deal with during his recovery from medical problems;
E
> Erin > > > > > Erin > > > (sorry i have changed my subscription-- > > > i am still Erin as posting in the past.) Joy - 30 Jun 2008 05:37 GMT It doesn't help her move on. Which I suppose is the point.
> And this helps you to move on exactly how? > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] >> >> Erin AllYou! - 30 Jun 2008 13:03 GMT In news:11ad2b53-15c1-43c1-a643-f1ffab6aa679@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com, Erin <squiggle@sympatico.ca> mused:
> Regarding the possible medical causes > that may have changed my DH's personality [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > with the marriage or me, but rather with the > med withdrawal and accumulated stress. So now you're back to looking for excuses for why you find yourself where you are.
Spottles - 30 Jun 2008 13:19 GMT > In > news:11ad2b53-15c1-43c1-a643-f1ffab6aa679@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com, [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > So now you're back to looking for excuses for why you find yourself > where you are. AY, i don't have to look for excuses to find out why i am where i am; i know why.
Erin
AllYou! - 30 Jun 2008 13:38 GMT In news:cf6e8ecd-d5be-42af-aaba-4745fe14ff3d@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com, Spottles <im906768@gmail.com> mused:
>> In >> news:11ad2b53-15c1-43c1-a643-f1ffab6aa679@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com, [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > AY, i don't have to look for excuses to find out why i am where > i am; i know why. Yet another handle? It must be difficult to keep them all straight.
Spottles - 30 Jun 2008 17:12 GMT > In > news:cf6e8ecd-d5be-42af-aaba-4745fe14ff3d@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com, [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > Yet another handle? It must be difficult to keep them all straight. I already posted a notice that i am still Erin, though i have opened a gmail account. Have a nice day.
E
|
|
|