Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Mothers / April 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I win

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
nanner - 27 Apr 2007 21:05 GMT
I had to go have a meeting with the district to see if we could continue
speech therapy services for DD. It would end in 2 months if not.

So, they approved her for next year, September through June but not this
summer! I was not having it!! Lucky I came in with some idea that they do it
this way.

Our speech therapist was on the phone teleconferencing in. He is not allowed
to advocate and can only be impartial and answer the district's speech
pathologist's questions about testing, etc.

Well, to get to the point! DD has major articulation issues, all motor
stuff. Well, they said they reserve the summer program for kids that have
receptive language problems. he then started to define it all (which i knew
so i cut him off, probably pissed him off) and I said "Well, what about the
childrent that have no trouble with language but have problems oral motor
issues? Why should DS have to have a 6 week lapse in services just to
regress and start over in september??"

They told me - get this..."Your daughter will be fine [note- they never met
her, she was not at the meeting] She will catch up. We could show you
children that have such problems you would cry. You would go home in tears."

Um, huh? Wtf!!!

I said "That's ridiculous" And i went on a bit of a tangent myself. In the
end we got her the summer services too. My speech therapist called me after
to say it's a good thing i spoke up after all that because he was not
allowed to fight for us! Could only answer questions impartially and he's
seen lots of parents sit there and not get services.

Harummmpphh. I really feel for those of you with children that need you to
fight for them and services all the time. It's no day at the beach..

Oh. and i did NOT thank them when they approved the servies.
Aula - 27 Apr 2007 23:04 GMT
>I had to go have a meeting with the district to see if we could continue
>speech therapy services for DD. It would end in 2 months if not.
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Oh. and i did NOT thank them when they approved the servies.

Good work.  It always amazes me how many of us [us= people in general] don't
fight for things we need, but take someone else's word as the final absolute
on things.  When buying cars, for example, many haggle, why not when dealing
with things like this?  Great job!  I hope your DD just wows everyone with
her progress and becomes a poster girl for the importance of continuing
therapy during the summer and how much can be saved in the long run by doing
so!

-Aula
betsy - 29 Apr 2007 22:12 GMT
> I had to go have a meeting with the district to see if we could continue
> speech therapy services for DD. It would end in 2 months if not.
>
> So, they approved her for next year, September through June but not this
> summer! I was not having it!! Lucky I came in with some idea that they do it
> this way.

> I said "That's ridiculous" And i went on a bit of a tangent myself. In the
> end we got her the summer services too. My speech therapist called

Good Job!  Getting summer  services is very hard.  I never managed it
for my daughter.  It took so long to get evaluation appointments and
for them to find time to fit her into their schedule that we didn't
start until late winter/early spring.  We got her started and she was
beginning to make some good progress, but then we had our IEP meeting
and they told us she was not eligible for summer services because she
hadn't been receiving services long enough to qualify.  That summer I
paid to put her in a student teaching program at a university in a
nearby city and found a good SLP to come to our home weekly and teach
her.  I continued to pay for the private SLP to come to our home even
during the school year since the SLP was good and was willing to work
on quality of life issues like helping my daughter learn to pronounce
her own name so she could introduce herself to other kids at the
park.  We couldn't get that in the IEP since one of the sounds in her
name wasn't an age appropriate skill.

The next spring at our IEP meeting I tried to get summer services for
her, but they said she didn't qualify since she hadn't regressed the
previous summer without services.  I pointed out that the reason she
hadn't regressed was because I had paid for a summer full of speech
therapy, but they said that the only way to show that she would be at
risk for regressing would be to show regression without services.
Since I was never willing to allow regression, I just continued to pay
for private speech therapy in the summer.

--Betsy
Caledonia - 30 Apr 2007 02:46 GMT
> I had to go have a meeting with the district to see if we could continue
> speech therapy services for DD. It would end in 2 months if not.
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Oh. and i did NOT thank them when they approved the servies.

I was with you and cheering for your success until the 'I did not
thank them' comment -- my take, from my district, is that there's a
whole lot of balancing going on, and depending on your reimbursement
scheme, it may just be that the pot of dollars for services i(overall)
is relatively fixed -- in other words, a service for person x means
that person y doesn't receive services or materials -- yes, EI
services are a given, but the dollars for them come from somewhere, or
often, someone. The decision-maker is not in an enviable position, and
(again, just my experience) has no malice -- its a hard job, and a
thank you does go a long way.

Kudos on getting services for your daugther, though.

Caledonia
nanner - 30 Apr 2007 13:28 GMT
>> I had to go have a meeting with the district to see if we could continue
>> speech therapy services for DD. It would end in 2 months if not.
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
>
> Caledonia

I understand your point but you weren't there. this woman had an attitude,
was innapropriate and came down on me pretty hard. After all that I was
*not* going to give this woman a personal "thank you" when she was following
the guidelines and giving my daughter what she deserved and what our tax
dollars pay for. I pay a LOT of money to school taxes in a district that can
not provide a suitable program to either of my children, in turn I pay ALOT
of money for private schools. DD fits the criteria for summer services for
speech. This woman had no place comming down on me that way - thankfully DD
was in school and didn't have to hear her! I DID thank the entire group as I
left but when she announced that *she* was going to *give* us summer
services I did not say "thank you " to HER.  I did not cop an attitude and I
wasn't rude to them, thanks were given for their time.

BTW - our speech therapist was on phone conference and he agreed that I
shouldn't have directly thanked her when she "awarded" us with summer
services. he was SHOCKED by her outrageous comments
Caledonia - 30 Apr 2007 18:34 GMT
> >> I had to go have a meeting with the district to see if we could continue
> >> speech therapy services for DD. It would end in 2 months if not.
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
> shouldn't have directly thanked her when she "awarded" us with summer
> services. he was SHOCKED by her outrageous comments

Too true -- and you're completely right, I've likely misread the
situation. (As our tax bill is not yet in the five figures range,
I'think I waffle with the guilt that we're likely consuming more
service than we receive. Here, I think I always feel guilty as I know
our tax bill doesn't cover the cost of services that we receive
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.