Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Mothers / February 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Hmmmmmmmm

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
toto - 04 Feb 2008 19:16 GMT
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080204/od_afp/britainpeoplehistoryoffbeat;_ylt=AlN
VEYQKTd6Mzn0HeBtOZLgDW7oF


Quarter of Brits think Churchill was myth: poll

LONDON (AFP) - Britons are losing their grip on reality, according to
a poll out Monday which showed that nearly a quarter think Winston
Churchill was a myth while the majority reckon Sherlock Holmes was
real.

The survey found that 47 percent thought the 12th century English king
Richard the Lionheart was a myth.

And 23 percent thought World War II prime minister Churchill was made
up. The same percentage thought Crimean War nurse Florence Nightingale
did not actually exist.

Three percent thought Charles Dickens, one of Britain's most famous
writers, is a work of fiction himself.

Indian political leader Mahatma Gandhi and Battle of Waterloo victor
the Duke of Wellington also appeared in the top 10 of people thought
to be myths.

Meanwhile, 58 percent thought Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's fictional
detective Holmes actually existed; 33 percent thought the same of W.
E. Johns' fictional pilot and adventurer Biggles.

UKTV Gold television surveyed 3,000 people.

Signature

Dorothy

There is no sound, no cry in all the world
that can be heard unless someone listens ..

The Outer Limits

The Ranger - 04 Feb 2008 19:59 GMT
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080204/od_afp/britainpeoplehistoryoffbeat;_ylt=AlN
VEYQKTd6Mzn0HeBtOZLgDW7oF

>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> UKTV Gold television surveyed 3,000 people.

The first thing I worry about when seeing "news stories" like this
are, _who_ participated in the poll and just how serious was the
study taken and by whom.

I know, from conducting one in collej during a semester of
statistical analysis, that you really get what you ask for with
ambiguously [poorly] worded questions. If you poll around a pub
(or the dorms, often very similar participatory levels), you'll
get skewed results vs. polling financial districts or libraries.

The Ranger
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.