I have a question
|
|
Thread rating:  |
katrun9358 - 28 Nov 2004 23:51 GMT I am sorry to interrupt your newsgroup but I was wondering something. I am a new mother and have another on the way. I was recently watching a television program and it had a character that beat her child and of course got caught for it and was sent to jail. I was wondering why people would want to beat there kids, is it that it makes them feel better about themselves or is it just something that they do if u could please explain this to me because I have no idea what would make them want to do such a thing.
Nan - 29 Nov 2004 00:20 GMT >I am sorry to interrupt your newsgroup but I was wondering something. >I am a new mother and have another on the way. I was recently watching [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >could please explain this to me because I have no idea what would make >them want to do such a thing. You're not interrupting, we like new posters :-)
I don't know that any of us can explain why people do what they do.... we can only guess, I suppose. Maybe they were beaten as children, and think that is the correct way to behave. Maybe they're mentally unstable. Maybe they're overworked and over-stressed and have no help from family, friends or a partner.
Nan
ºFree~Spiritº - 29 Nov 2004 01:38 GMT >>I am sorry to interrupt your newsgroup but I was wondering something. >>I am a new mother and have another on the way. I was recently watching [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >Nan And maybe they just have a fuse way to short.
Free Spirit DD(8) DS(11)
Nan - 29 Nov 2004 02:01 GMT >>>I am sorry to interrupt your newsgroup but I was wondering something. >>>I am a new mother and have another on the way. I was recently watching [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > >And maybe they just have a fuse way to short. Yeah, but I'd put that in the mentally unstable category.
Nan
barrettath@aol.com - 29 Nov 2004 02:29 GMT > >>>I am sorry to interrupt your newsgroup but I was wondering something. > >>>I am a new mother and have another on the way. I was recently watching [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Nan Lead Foot Mama - 29 Nov 2004 02:31 GMT > >>>I am sorry to interrupt your newsgroup but I was wondering something. > >>>I am a new mother and have another on the way. I was recently watching [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Nan I don't know if I would go that far as to say that someone with a short temper is mentally unstable.
Nan - 29 Nov 2004 02:27 GMT >> >>>I am sorry to interrupt your newsgroup but I was wondering something. >> >>>I am a new mother and have another on the way. I was recently watching [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] >I don't know if I would go that far as to say that someone with a short >temper is mentally unstable. If it's short enough to the point of beating their kids, I would.
Nan
Lead Foot Mama - 29 Nov 2004 02:41 GMT > >I don't know if I would go that far as to say that someone with a short > >temper is mentally unstable. > > If it's short enough to the point of beating their kids, I would. > > Nan maybe you've got a point. :) Its one of those things I can't comprehend. I know I have my own short fuse in some cases, but I'm one to walk away from the situation when my fuse runs short.
Nan - 29 Nov 2004 02:39 GMT >> >I don't know if I would go that far as to say that someone with a short >> >temper is mentally unstable. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >I know I have my own short fuse in some cases, but I'm one to walk away from >the situation when my fuse runs short. That's all I meant. Most people can do what they need to, to keep their anger from hurting others. I have a short fuse sometimes, too. I think everyone I know has blown their top at one point or another, but I don't know anyone that would hurt someone else unless they're abusive types.
Nan
Nan - 29 Nov 2004 02:36 GMT >I don't know if I would go that far as to say that someone with a short >temper is mentally unstable. I'll elaborate. My definition of mentally unstable as used in this post, isn't 'bad'. I'm not sure why bad connotations are attached to that phrase, but it doesn't always indicate that. Anyway, I didn't say that someone with a short fuse or temper is mentally unstable. Heck, *I* have a short fuse sometimes. Most people do. But someone that has a constant short fuse to the point that it harms others.... that is another story altogether. Mental instability, emotional instability, anger management issues.... it's pretty much all the same issue with different labels when it comes to this type of negative behavior.
Nan
toto - 29 Nov 2004 14:28 GMT >I am sorry to interrupt your newsgroup but I was wondering >something. I am a new mother and have another on the [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >could please explain this to me because I have no idea >what would make them want to do such a thing. While no one can really tell you the motives people have for such violence, I can offer some speculation about it.
First, if someone was brought up being beaten himself or herself, that person might believe that s/he deserved it and thus think the the child deserved it for misbehavior.
Second, if someone has never been taught or seen appropriate ways to handle anger, they may simply strike out at the nearest object or person when they are angry and the anger can get out of control very easily. This is why we as a society need to help parents of young children to find ways to release anger without harming others.
The difference between you and the character in the tv show is one of control. When you are angry, you most likely have various ways of cooling off that don't involve striking out at another person.
-- Dorothy
There is no sound, no cry in all the world that can be heard unless someone listens ..
The Outer Limits
barrettath - 30 Nov 2004 03:02 GMT > >I am sorry to interrupt your newsgroup but I was wondering > >something. I am a new mother and have another on the [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > various ways of cooling off that don't involve striking out at > another person. I am also a new mother and I was wondering exactly what you think beating your kids is defined as because I hit my kids when they are being mean or as a way I guess or punishment because it seems to be getting to them a whole lot faster than grounding them, I have tried both.
Broken - 30 Nov 2004 04:52 GMT >> >I am sorry to interrupt your newsgroup but I was wondering >> >something. I am a new mother and have another on the [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] >getting to them a whole lot faster than grounding them, I have tried >both. She's unlikely to respond to this because she won't be back till the 11th of December, but I can certainly answer for myself.
These are my opinions, and only my opinions. They are directly from my experience as a father to two children, a son and a daughter.
I have no idea how Dorothy will answer this, I only speak for myself.
I do not believe physical punishment in the form of pain is necessary to get a child to respect you. The more aggression you show to a child, the less they respect you, and the more they fear you...fear is not a prerequisite for a child to obey, and neither is pain. Although both can be an effective deterrent for a child to listen, there are other manners of teaching a child that can help the relationship between them and their parents. They can also further that child to have more confidence in themselves as they progress through life.
I have never 'smacked' my kids, I have never spanked them for any reason whatsoever. And they are two of the most polite kids I have ever had the pleasure of knowing. They are my friends as well as my children, and they obey me without question.
I *have* 'swatted' them lightly on the bottom to correct them and get their attention...but only when they were very young. When they both turned 5 and 8, that ended because it was unnecessary.
IMO, the number one rule, *never* administer punishment when you are angry, and *always* make sure that the child understands the reasons behind the punishment. And never let the anger linger in your attitude towards the child...they must understand that regardless of their mistake and your corrections...you will always love them.
Listen to their side of the story...parents can misunderstand just as much as the next person...and it might shed light as to the reasons why the child misbehaved in the first place and how to prevent a particular situation from repeating before it even starts.
Correcting a child in the form of a smack on the bottom when they're toddlers and acting up...can go a long way towards giving a child the respect they crave...and allowing them to eventually return it right back to you.
Beating a child can be considered pretty much losing control out of anger...and taking a punishment too far. The child won't learn respect, they'll learn to fear you.
Where a child is concerned...there's a *big* difference between the two. -- X
Tori M. - 30 Nov 2004 05:08 GMT > Beating a child can be considered pretty much losing control out of > anger...and taking a punishment too far. The child won't learn [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > -- > X I was just gonna lurk here because I post in a zillion other newsgroups too much already but I wanted to tell you this is the best post I have seen on this subject to date.
Tori
 Signature Bonnie 3/20/02 Xavier 10/27/04
Nan - 30 Nov 2004 16:29 GMT >> Beating a child can be considered pretty much losing control out of >> anger...and taking a punishment too far. The child won't learn [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >Tori Hey woman :-) Ohhh, noooo.... once you delurk, that's it. You must stay ;-)
Nan
Broken - 30 Nov 2004 20:28 GMT >> Beating a child can be considered pretty much losing control out of >> anger...and taking a punishment too far. The child won't learn [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >Tori Why...thank you very much. :) -- X
Nan - 30 Nov 2004 16:30 GMT >These are my opinions, and only my opinions. They are directly from my >experience as a father to two children, a son and a daughter. [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] >Where a child is concerned...there's a *big* difference between the >two. Not snipping a fantabulous word. *clap, clap*
Nan
Broken - 30 Nov 2004 20:28 GMT >>These are my opinions, and only my opinions. They are directly from my >>experience as a father to two children, a son and a daughter. [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > >Nan
:) Thanks dear. -- X
toto - 30 Nov 2004 19:22 GMT >She's unlikely to respond to this because she won't be back till the >11th of December, but I can certainly answer for myself. I don't leave until tomorrow, dear...
I like your answer though.
-- Dorothy
There is no sound, no cry in all the world that can be heard unless someone listens ..
The Outer Limits
Broken - 30 Nov 2004 20:11 GMT >>She's unlikely to respond to this because she won't be back till the >>11th of December, but I can certainly answer for myself. > >I don't leave until tomorrow, dear... Arrrrgh...foiled again!
>I like your answer though. Thanks hon.
It's taken from experience. And you know my kids well enough to know that it works extraordinarily well. :) -- X
toto - 30 Nov 2004 19:21 GMT >I am also a new mother and I was wondering exactly >what you think beating your kids is defined as because >I hit my kids when they are being mean or as a way I >guess or punishment because it seems to be getting >to them a whole lot faster than grounding them, I have >tried both. You hit a newborn?
How old are your children?
Do you really think that hitting (which is being mean to them) will teach them not to be mean to others?
What do you think they will do when they believe they will not be caught?
ImNsho, punishment is unnecessary *and* insufficient. Positive Parenting works better and makes for a much better family atmosphere. It *is* hard work because most of us were raised with behavioristic solutions including external rewards and punishment, but on the whole, it produces self-disciplined people rather than people who rely on *authority* to know what to do.
Here is a brief summary of positive parenting for you to ponder. It's not a prescription. Take only what you feel resonates well with you and *do* think about adding things to it as you learn. The thing is that positive parenting is mainly about a change of attitude toward our children and not so much with techniques to control their behavior.
****************************************************************
Positive Parenting Methods
First and foremost, model the behavior you want your child to emulate. Children learn what they live. Teach by example, not words.
Second, assume your child is good even when she misbehaves. Understand that her actions have an underlying developmental reason.
Third, state your rules and requests in positive ways, not negative ones. Redirect him to things he can do rather than trying to keep him away from things without alternatives.
Fourth, explain. Make sure you have her attention. You may need to go closer to her, to touch her shoulder, to look directly in her eyes.
Fifth, always try to look for the underlying cause of the behavior and address that so that the need is actually met in acceptable ways. Give him choices between many things that are acceptable to you
Sixth, give her warnings of transitions so that they become easier to manage. Children, like adults, need to complete activities they are absorbed in.
Seventh, allow for time-outs when your emotions or his are out of control. Time-outs can be used non-punitively to allow both the adult and child to regain control of their emotions. Teach him to count to 10, to breathe, to walk away by modelling the techniques you use to manage your anger.
Eighth, say what you mean and mean what you say. Don't give a lot of warnings, give one and then act. Give her time to comply, but follow through.
Ninth, plan for situations before they arise. Try to stay calm yourself. Allow him to vent his feelings and accept them.
Tenth, as your child grows, involve her in making the rules and choosing the consequences for breaking them Brainstorm and problem solve with her.
Eleventh, make amends when you make a mistake. Apologize to your child when you have made a mistake. Accept his apologies gracefully as well.
Twelfth, give your child responsibility for real tasks that help make your family work, keeping the chores within her developmental stage and allowing her input into what the chores should be and when to do them.
Children should experience the *natural consequences* of their actions, since that is how they learn. But making up logical consequences to substitute for natural ones often becomes a problem.
Still Cline and Fay are worthwhile to read http://www.loveandlogic.com/
This site has even better ideas, imho. http://www.naturalchild.org/ or these http://www.empathicparenting.org/ http://www.flyingboy.com/relationships-parenting.htm or this one for teachers http://www.marvinmarshall.com/
Some good resource books are: How To Talk So Kids Will Listen And Listen So Kids Will Talk by Adele Faber and Elaine Mazlish.
By the same authors, Their older book is currently in reprint and shows the process that families go through when they are changing their style. It's called Liberated Parents, Liberated Children. They have also written in detail about siblings in a book called Siblings Without Rivalry.
For a Christian approach, you may want to read: You Can Have A Family Where Everybody Wins by Rev. Earl Gaulke.
A General Theory of Love by Thomas Lewis, MD and others is a good book on the brain research behind our emotions and why they are important especially for children.
This post is copywrited by me and appears on Ghostwolf's Insights page on his web site. Please feel free to use, it by I would appreciate my name staying with it if you do use it.
For those interested in the topic of sexual abuse of children, please read Wolf's web site and Silenced Child's web site.
http://www.nemasys.com/ghostwolf/ http://www.angelfire.com/zine/silencedchild/index.html
-- Dorothy
There is no sound, no cry in all the world that can be heard unless someone listens ..
The Outer Limits
|
|
|