 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Family Forum / Parenting / Mothers / May 2005Prayers for another
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=22844 This lady is facing a dreadful day. This is a big issue here, with a lot of debate on her guilt/innocence. She's already been in jail for over 6 months. A very scary prospect for her, because Malaysia has the death penalty for drug trafficking. Prayers for her that the true verdict is delivered. Marc > http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=22844 Marc, The link isn't working for me. Do you have another link with the story? -Kara. >>http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=22844 > > Marc, > The link isn't working for me. Do you have another link with the story? > > -Kara. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4539345.stm God guilty 20 years wrong, just wrong <snip> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4539345.stm > > God > guilty > 20 years > wrong, just wrong It's enough to make anyone stay home, Sue. And it is a lenient sentence for that court. And if you can believe the idiocy of some http://www.sundaytelegraph.news.com.au/story/0,9353,15213859-28778,00.html and that happened after Corby was put in jail and the court case has started. Makes anyone wonder if the kids know what is going on in the world or if they really only see dollar signs. /sigh Marc <snip> >> http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=22844 > > Marc, > The link isn't working for me. Do you have another link with the story? > > -Kara. No I don't but if you google "schappelle corby" it will tell her story. Marc "Marc" <mPAMpaisl@optusnet.com.au> wrote in: > No I don't but if you google "schappelle corby" it will tell her story. Thanks Marc and Sue. What a sad, sad story. What shocked me was their REASONING for not looking into the baggage handlers claim. Just because it doesn't happen much? That's not right. :( -Kara. The story has been on the national news here for the past 2 days. Absolutely devastating outcome IMO. I just don't understand their reasoning. The one article said they don't believe she was set up because that doesn't happen often or something to that effect. That's just ridiculous!!! How on earth is that solid grounds for ignoring her claims?? I feel so sad for her and her family. :( -Kara. <snip> > The story has been on the national news here for the past 2 days. > Absolutely [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > -Kara. Apparently in Malaysian law, it is up to the defendant to prove their innocence. So to prove she is innocent, she would have to produce the person who owns up to putting it there. Difficult to say the least. There is now a shrink wrapping operating at the nearest international airport. But, in view of this case, you also need a certificate of weight put on it, so the changes have to go a way further. Thus if the shrink wrap is disturbed and the weight is different and nothing has been taken out that was put in, you possibly may be able to prove it wasn't you. Providing also that there are no nefarious baggage handlers that would replace the shrink wrap and weight certificate. Looking in the light of the impossible, one of these days air travel will require a personal interview, with a review of your luggage contents. Only require you to turn up to the airport two days before your flight, lol. Marc > Apparently in Malaysian law, it is up to the defendant to prove their > innocence. So to prove she is innocent, she would have to produce the person > who owns up to putting it there. Difficult to say the least. Yikes. That's very tough. > There is now a shrink wrapping operating at the nearest international > airport. But, in view of this case, you also need a certificate of weight > put on it, so the changes have to go a way further. Thus if the shrink wrap > is disturbed and the weight is different and nothing has been taken out that > was put in, you possibly may be able to prove it wasn't you. Sheeesh! That' crazy! > Providing also that there are no nefarious baggage handlers that would > replace the shrink wrap and weight certificate. Right but what defines a nefarious baggage handler and who the heck is going to believe anyone that makes that claim anyway. Seems like to them everyone is guilty no matter what. > Looking in the light of the impossible, one of these days air travel will > require a personal interview, with a review of your luggage contents. Only > require you to turn up to the airport two days before your flight, lol. You're not kidding!!! ROFL! -Kara. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.