Now this is what I'm talking about when I discuss CPS reform.
What do you think about CAC's?
And Greg, you may be excused if you wish, though we do value your
input, you being the chief among child and family rights advocates in
these newsgroups 0;]
After all, it is you that intends to expose a ring of criminals
including Kevin Concannon, your state's DHS director, when he was
Oregon's director, and Donald L. Fisher, of Oregon SOSCF, that have
participated in selling "good used mixed race babies," via a new
removed website for 'marketing.'
Isn't that correct, or did I misunderstand you?
You are going to act soon, right?
Well, back to reform:
http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/multi-site_evaluation_children.html
0:-] - 14 Mar 2007 19:28 GMT
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:30:58 -0700, "0:-]" <pohaku.kane@gmail.com>
wrote:...a small but significant error, a typo, to fix, and further
thoughts on CACs.
Look for ** for error correction.
>Now this is what I'm talking about when I discuss CPS reform.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Oregon's director, and Donald L. Fisher, of Oregon SOSCF, that have
>participated in selling "good used mixed race babies," via a **new
** that should have read "now."
>removed website for 'marketing.'
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/multi-site_evaluation_children.html
Well as a couple of you know I tend when offered "evidence" ask for
source, and or investigate on my own.
And I don't limit that to just things I think I'll disagree with, but
'good news' especially.
I'm currently on the trail of the information above that touts CACs
that do abuse evaluations and may have uncovered a thread that casts
some doubts on their efficacy.
A whisper that some SWs have run into problems with the "credentialled
forensic interviewers."
I'll continue watching to see what comes up.
Kane