Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Parenting / March 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How I'm going to educate my children about SEX

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
gooddad@rock.com - 28 Mar 2007 04:14 GMT
As a Christian American Father, I want to make sure that my son is
well informed about sex by age 14.  When my son turns 14, or possibly
even sooner, I intend to educate him about safe sex to avoid pregnancy
and disease.  This means educating him on the 10 most common STD's
(Herpes, Warts/HPV, HIV, Molluscum Contagiosum, Gonorrhea, Chlamydia/
NGU, Trichomoniasis, Crabs, Scabies, and Syphilis) the need to use a
condom to avoid these, and impressing upon him the necessity of using
two forms of birth control to avoid pregnancy as a minor - to make
sure his girlfriends are either on the pill or using another sort of
hormonal birth control or a diaphragm, in addition to a condom, or
else, to pull out even while using a condom.  So I thought it would be
a good idea to give my Son an assortment of condoms and some lube at
age 14.  I see they have an excellent selection at http://www.condomdepot.com.
I also thought it would be a good idea to get him a subscription to
Playboy or Penthouse, and wide access to internet porn.  In addition
to these products, I thought it would be a good idea to get him 4-6
fleshlight masturbation toys from http://www.fleshlight.com, a
chastity belt to help him control his masturbation urges, so he does
not deplete himself too much http://www.cb-2000.com/, and to educate
him on the benefits of not ejaculating every day, but rather to
attempt to have multiple orgasms without ejaculating, but that this -
the best sex - is best accomplished through love or sexual desire, and
give him tips on how to get girls, such as those at http://www.pickupguide.com/layguide/,
tell him to be proactive, and ask girls out, that it's better to have
sex than to masturbate, and I also intend to get him a full or queen
size bed, and let him start having girls sleep over, and to sleep over
his girlfriend's houses; but I'm not sure about the need to check this
with the girl's parents. If the girls just sleeps over - I don't know
what they're doing in their room (if anything) right, so I'm not sure
if this is important.

I also thought that it would be prudent to do a similar thing for my
daughter.  As well as the above, I intend to get her the Jack Rabbit
Vibrator by age 14, http://www.jackrabbit-vibe.com/ and the Hitachi
Wand http://www.hitachi-magic-wand.com/ , as well as a subscription to
a hormonal birth control method if she wants and is sexually active.

I also intend to give my children a basic sex education at an early
age (penis, vagina, intercourse, sperm, fallopian tubes, etc. baby)
and teach them that they own their own bodies, to not let anyone touch
them if they don't want to be touched, or in ways they don't want to
be touched, and to "just say no" to sex they don't want.

I just wanted to make sure all this is legal, because I heard the
government had passed some laws against giving porno to minors.  Is
this a crime if it's your own children?  I know I benefited greatly
from access to porn at an early age, and I believe in my children's
freedom to see and hear whatever they want.  I'm not with censorship.
John Manning - 28 Mar 2007 14:51 GMT
> As a Christian American Father, I want to make sure that my son is
> well informed about sex by age 14.  When my son turns 14, or possibly
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> from access to porn at an early age, and I believe in my children's
> freedom to see and hear whatever they want.  I'm not with censorship.

The right wing authoritarian government loves to get in your pants.
shawly - 28 Mar 2007 16:18 GMT
> The right wing authoritarian government loves to get in your pants.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

The left wing authoritarian government loves to tell you how much to
pay for your pants and who should pay for them.
John Manning - 28 Mar 2007 18:06 GMT
>> The right wing authoritarian government loves to get in your pants.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> The left wing authoritarian government loves to tell you how much to
> pay for your pants and who should pay for them.

Nonsense.
shawly - 28 Mar 2007 20:06 GMT
> >> The right wing authoritarian government loves to get in your pants.- Hide quoted text -
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Nonsense.

No more than your statement -- or do you think the democrats have no
desire to control you -- they just have a different angle.  Just to be
honest I am a Libertarian, I see both parties almost in the same light.
Jerry - 29 Mar 2007 00:25 GMT
> > >> The right wing authoritarian government loves to get in your pants.- Hide quoted text -
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> desire to control you -- they just have a different angle.  Just to be
> honest I am a Libertarian, I see both parties almost in the same light.

The libertarians want us to pay fair-market price for our pants.  But
once we have the pants we're free to do what we please with them.

To respond to the original post:  Dude, WTF?!?
John Manning - 29 Mar 2007 16:43 GMT
>>>> The right wing authoritarian government loves to get in your pants.- Hide quoted text -
>>>> - Show quoted text -
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> desire to control you -- they just have a different angle.  Just to be
> honest I am a Libertarian, I see both parties almost in the same light.

I belong to no political party. But I still think your reply was
nonsense. My statement wasn't nonsense. The right wingers are notorious
for passing or promoting 'sex' laws.
shawly - 29 Mar 2007 18:22 GMT
> >>>> The right wing authoritarian government loves to get in your pants.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>> - Show quoted text -
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> nonsense. My statement wasn't nonsense. The right wingers are notorious
> for passing or promoting 'sex' laws.

disagreeing with John is Nonsense, his opinion is the only rational
thought process allowed, typical authoritarian view.  Authoritarian's
pass or promote sex laws.
John Manning - 29 Mar 2007 21:35 GMT
>>>>>> The right wing authoritarian government loves to get in your pants.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> thought process allowed, typical authoritarian view.  Authoritarian's
> pass or promote sex laws.

Irrational, hostile ad hominem.
Colonel Jake - 30 Mar 2007 08:00 GMT
: >>>>>> The right wing authoritarian government loves to get in your pants.- Hide quoted text -
: >>>>>> - Show quoted text -
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
:
: Irrational, hostile ad hominem.

Nice to see you're back John?,
"Did you have a excillerent vacation?!?!?!..."

Peace

--
Colonel Jake
shawly - 30 Mar 2007 16:23 GMT
> >>>>>> The right wing authoritarian government loves to get in your pants.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>> - Show quoted text -
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Only when read by an irrational, left wing, Authoritarian.
John Manning - 30 Mar 2007 19:08 GMT
>>>>>>>> The right wing authoritarian government loves to get in your pants.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Only when read by an irrational, left wing, Authoritarian.

Grow up, little man.
shawly - 30 Mar 2007 19:14 GMT
> >>>>>>>> The right wing authoritarian government loves to get in your pants.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

What,  "Irrational, hostile ad hominem" from John Manning, who would
of thunk it.  I am so surprise by this response from the Great John
Manning.
Just Wondering - 30 Mar 2007 21:29 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>The right wing authoritarian government loves to get in your pants.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>- Show quoted text -
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> of thunk it.  I am so surprise by this response from the Great John
> Manning.

He probably thinks we should all salute and say "Aye,aye, Cap'n Ahab."
R. Steve Walz - 29 Mar 2007 22:35 GMT
> > >>>> The right wing authoritarian government loves to get in your pants.- Hide quoted text -
> > >>>> - Show quoted text -
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> thought process allowed, typical authoritarian view.  Authoritarian's
> pass or promote sex laws.
----------------
Don't be stupid, anyone who sees you're wrong would be just as apt
to oppose you, they wouldn't have to be some "authoritarian", or is
that always your diversion when anyone opposes you??

And why are you posting to insane groups like
alt.religion.scientology,alt.religion.mormon

You're just a troll.
Steve
shawly - 30 Mar 2007 21:29 GMT
> ----------------
> Don't be stupid, anyone who sees you're wrong would be just as apt
> to oppose you, they wouldn't have to be some "authoritarian", or is
> that always your diversion when anyone opposes you??

who is opposing me, did you even read the string.  John Manning is the
constant off topic Troll here on alt.religion.mormon.  John attributes
all evil in the world to the right wing authoratarian Bush
administration.  My point was it isn't just the republicans that
impose there will on others.  John has a constant set of blinders on,
he only has one narrow view of the world.  A view that makes him no
different that the people he critisizes.  Just because his view
opposes doesn't make him as open minded as he would all like us to
believe.

> And why are you posting to insane groups like
> alt.religion.scientology,alt.religion.mormon

Ad-hominem and your incorrect personal opinion aside...

> You're just a troll.

Am I now, what is your narrow, self imposed view of a Troll.  My only
mistake looking back, is that I forgot to delete the cross posting.  A
mistake I will correct after this response to you.
R. Steve Walz - 31 Mar 2007 10:59 GMT
> > Don't be stupid, anyone who sees you're wrong would be just as apt
> > to oppose you, they wouldn't have to be some "authoritarian", or is
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> all evil in the world to the right wing authoratarian Bush
> administration.
------------------
He isn't far off.

> My point was it isn't just the republicans that
> impose there will on others.
-----------------
GROW UP!! EVERYBODY seeks to impose their will on others!!
And there's nothing wrong with that, unless you're UNFAIR and WRONG!

 John has a constant set of blinders on,
> he only has one narrow view of the world.  A view that makes him no
> different that the people he critisizes.  Just because his view
> opposes doesn't make him as open minded as he would all like us to
> believe.
------------------------
Open-minded isn't important. Open to evil and wrongness is bad,
openness to goodness and social progress and achievement is good!

Open-mindedness in and of itself is letting your head be everyone's
garbage can!!

> > And why are you posting to insane groups like
> > alt.religion.scientology,alt.religion.mormon
>
> Ad-hominem and your incorrect personal opinion aside...
----------------------------
Nonsense.

> > You're just a troll.
>
> Am I now, what is your narrow, self imposed view of a Troll.  My only
> mistake looking back, is that I forgot to delete the cross posting.  A
> mistake I will correct after this response to you.
----------------------------
Correction, you're merely an ignorant a.shole, not a troll.
Steve
Hephaestus - 29 Mar 2007 19:48 GMT
> > >> The right wing authoritarian government loves to get in your pants.- Hide quoted text -
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> desire to control you -- they just have a different angle.  Just to be
> honest I am a Libertarian, I see both parties almost in the same light.

I thought that was a centrist?
R. Steve Walz - 29 Mar 2007 21:41 GMT
> > >> The right wing authoritarian government loves to get in your pants.- Hide quoted text -
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> No more than your statement -- or do you think the democrats have no
> desire to control you -- they just have a different angle.
-------------------
No desire except fairness for everyone.

> Just to be
> honest I am a Libertarian, I see both parties almost in the same light.
--------------------
Nonsense, Libertarians are just Republicans without stock-options,
which means they're just the poor dupes of those with them.
Steve
Jerry - 30 Mar 2007 18:47 GMT
> --------------------
> Nonsense, Libertarians are just Republicans without stock-options,
> which means they're just the poor dupes of those with them.
> Steve

Libertarians have stock-options too.

Libertarians are Republicans that don't want religion dragged into
politics.
R. Steve Walz - 31 Mar 2007 10:53 GMT
> > --------------------
> > Nonsense, Libertarians are just Republicans without stock-options,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Libertarians are Republicans that don't want religion dragged into
> politics.
-------------------
So do Republican businessmen, unless, of course, that means the
model of sex as sin, instead of the model of profit as sin!!
Steve
R. Steve Walz - 29 Mar 2007 21:41 GMT
> > The right wing authoritarian government loves to get in your pants.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> The left wing authoritarian government loves to tell you how much to
> pay for your pants and who should pay for them.
---------------------------
And rightly so when right-wing thieves price the pants so they can
own our lives.
Steve
John - 29 Mar 2007 00:49 GMT
On Mar 27, 8:14 pm, good...@rock.com wrote:
> As a Christian American Father,

You sure seem know a lot about all the various sex toys, options,
methods, terminology, and overall lifestyle of the horny and
stupid...... for a christian father......
John - 29 Mar 2007 01:29 GMT
> On Mar 27, 8:14 pm, good...@rock.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> methods, terminology, and overall lifestyle of the horny and
> stupid...... for a christian father......

:-)

I forgot to add the smiley face at the end of this message......
sorry. Without that smiley, it looks confrontational, but it was not
meant that way.....
Helen - 29 Mar 2007 02:38 GMT
>> On Mar 27, 8:14 pm, good...@rock.com wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> sorry. Without that smiley, it looks confrontational, but it was not
> meant that way.....

LOL...
Helen - 29 Mar 2007 02:37 GMT
> On Mar 27, 8:14 pm, good...@rock.com wrote:
>> As a Christian American Father,
>
> You sure seem know a lot about all the various sex toys, options,
> methods, terminology, and overall lifestyle of the horny and
> stupid...... for a christian father...

I think it is clear he is exaclty not that..He is trolling...Bit of  a
tosser....
daniel - 29 Mar 2007 03:56 GMT
On Mar 27, 9:14 pm, good...@rock.com wrote:
> As a Christian American Father, I want to make sure that my son is
> well informed about sex by age 14.  When my son turns 14, or possibly
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> from access to porn at an early age, and I believe in my children's
> freedom to see and hear whatever they want.  I'm not with censorship.

geeee what a great parent your going to be. what if the condom breaks?
sex is right next to murder in sexual sins. REPENT!
Helen - 29 Mar 2007 11:12 GMT
> On Mar 27, 9:14 pm, good...@rock.com wrote:
>> As a Christian American Father, I want to make sure that my son is
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> geeee what a great parent your going to be. what if the condom breaks?
> sex is right next to murder in sexual sins. REPENT!

Tee hee, since when has sex been a sexual sin?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.