Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Parenting / July 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Help with violent child

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Page - 09 Jul 2004 16:03 GMT
I have a two year old son (will be 3 in October 2004) who is not
responding to our disciplinary tactics.  We have a 6 year old daughter
who was born with a desire to please.  She has never required anything
more than a stern look and then she's good for days.  My son is very
aggressive and obstinate.  To some degree I believe this is related to
the fact that he is a boy and some of it because he is the second
child.  Regardless of the reasons, we are at our wits end.

We don't take such a claim lightly.  I have degrees in Psychology and
Sociology and my wife is a professional child counselor with degrees
in Psychology and Counseling, so we've tried most of the standard
recommendations.

We try to first set a good example and provide a loving home with
plenty of encouragement and positive reinforcement for desired
behaviors.  Despite that, he insists on hitting, biting, and otherwise
hurting others.  Time-outs are not effective.  Some quiet time in his
room is only effective in getting him to apologize and stating that he
understands hurting others is wrong.  Within 5 minutes, he's hitting
someone again.  We've tried redirecting his behavior to a new
activity, but this is sometimes harder than it sounds

My wife and I are disgusted with ourselves since we have resorted to
tactics that we swore we would never engage.  For example, I have
spanked him a few times which is something our first child has never
required.  Twice my wife has bitten him back to show him how it feels
when he bites her.  Neither of us think this is a good way to deal
with his behavior, but we feel we are running out of options.

Television keeps his attention, thus keeping him out of trouble, but
there are so many ill effects to watching too much television that we
don't want to resort to that.

Any suggestions are appreciated.

Sincerely,
One who is beginning to understand why some mothers kill their
children.  :-)
jeffc - 10 Jul 2004 17:35 GMT
>  I have degrees in Psychology and
> Sociology and my wife is a professional child counselor with degrees
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> One who is beginning to understand why some mothers kill their
> children.  :-)

Uh huh.
Sue Larson - 11 Jul 2004 00:00 GMT
Surely you jest, but if not, Steve will give you a mouthful.
In the meantime,
a stern look
+we've tried most of the standard
> recommendations.
+Time-outs
+Some quiet time in his
> room
+I have
> spanked him a few times
+Twice my wife has bitten him back
+Television keeps his attention, thus keeping him out of trouble (all the
above descriptions add up to below)
______________________________________

My son is very
> aggressive and obstinate.
(I'm not surprised; why are you? Aggression feeds upon agression.)

I have degrees in Psychology and
> Sociology and my wife is a professional child counselor with degrees
> in Psychology and Counseling,

Degrees don't matter here; despite your having these degrees, your child is
out of control, because you are out of control with your disciplinary
responses. You definitely need alterative methods than the ones you are
using. You can start with paying more attention to him instead of putting
him in front of the TV, and quit spanking, biting,etc. him. Try treating him
with gentleness and loving guidance instead of aggression. Where do you
think your young son gets the aggression, if not learned from the people who
are inflicting it upon him?

Susan

> I have a two year old son (will be 3 in October 2004) who is not
> responding to our disciplinary tactics.  We have a 6 year old daughter
> who was born with a desire to please.  She has never required anything
> more than and then she's good for days.  To some degree I believe this is
related to
> the fact that he is a boy and some of it because he is the second
> child.  Regardless of the reasons, we are at our wits end.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> behaviors.  Despite that, he insists on hitting, biting, and otherwise
> hurting others.  are not effective.   is only effective in getting him to
apologize and stating that he
> understands hurting others is wrong.  Within 5 minutes, he's hitting
> someone again.  We've tried redirecting his behavior to a new
> activity, but this is sometimes harder than it sounds
>
> My wife and I are disgusted with ourselves since we have resorted to
> tactics that we swore we would never engage.  For example, which is
something our first child has never
> required.  to show him how it feels
> when he bites her.  Neither of us think this is a good way to deal
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> One who is beginning to understand why some mothers kill their
> children.  :-)
Page - 12 Jul 2004 21:38 GMT
> Surely you jest, but if not, Steve will give you a mouthful.
> In the meantime,
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> > aggressive and obstinate.
> (I'm not surprised; why are you? Aggression feeds upon agression.)

I'm afraid that usenet group posting don't allow complete disclosure
of all events and some of my comments have been miscontrued.  The
first year is hard to count since a child that young hardly
understands discipline, but for the first two years of his life we
have been exceptionally consistent.  More consistent than any other
parent-team that we know.  We work well together and do not allow the
kids to "play" us against each other.  As far as corporal punishment
goes, we never laid a hand on my older child or my younger until just
recently when my wife's patience with the younger began to reach her
limits.  That said even the "agression" from us that you reference was
not done out of anger.  It was done without showing emotion which is
not always an easy thing to achieve.  We know how important it is to
take a deep breath and work cognitively and not out of reaction.

Although I work during the day, when I am home, I take time to play
with my children as a group and then later on an individual basis.
Having only 2 kids allows for this.  With my son, I usually end up
playing Hotwheels, an Old MacDonald farm game, or reading a book to
him.  This does not necessarily keep him from headbutting, kicking, or
hitting me in the middle of it.  Throwing the Hotwheels or other
objects is pretty common, also.  I consistently responde with a verbal
reprimand such as "Adam, you may not throw your toys.  Someone may get
hurt.  If you do it again, you will have to sit in timeout."  I do not
get angry or aggressive with him.  He will generally then pick up
another car and throw it although he will usually do it a little less
enthusiastically as if he's trying to figure out just where I draw the
line between "throwing" and "dropping".  Then I tell him that I see he
has chosen a timeout.  I tell him to go sit in the corner for a minute
until he's ready to listen.  If he runs or does not budge, I tell him,
"Adam you may walk to the timeout corner yourself or Daddy will carry
you to the timeout corner.  You pick.  If you don't pick, Daddy gets
to pick."  After a minute or so he's usually saying he's sorry.  I
walk over to him and kneel down at his level.  I ask him why he was in
timeout and if he understands why he can not throw his toys.  He
explains that he threw a toy and it could hurt somebody.  I then give
him a big hug tell him I love him and resume playing whatever game he
chooses.  Within a few minutes, the cycle repeats itself until
bedtime.  Then I get an hour or so to spend with my daughter.  This is
how every evening goes.  In short, timeouts are not doing the trick
and being calm and loving is not enough.  Something else must be added
to our discipline.

>  I have degrees in Psychology and
> > Sociology and my wife is a professional child counselor with degrees
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> think your young son gets the aggression, if not learned from the people who
> are inflicting it upon him?

With the exception of the two or three previously mentioned
transgressions, we do not exhibit violence in our home.  I am very
against it and my wife even more so. We are in the process of reading
a few books on challenging kids.  Some offer some very good insight.
I believe the one that is helping us the most right now is titled, The
Challenging Child: Understanding, Raising, and Enjoying the Five
"Difficult" Types of Children.  Our son definitely fits the
description of the aggresive child.

> Susan

I appreciate some of your comments Susan.  I suspect that you mean
well.  It appears from some of the other responses, that other people
on this forum either do not have children or simply contribute to
further their personal agendas.  I was truly seeking assistance, but
pretty much just got flamed by Steve which I don'd understand since
one would think that this would be a good place to vent frustrations,
gather thoughts, get suggestions, and formulate a new plan-of-attack.
Pardon the "violent" expression.

My favorite response is the one by Steve who must either not have
children this age or has forgotten what they are like.  My son is
nearly 3 (in October), is completely potty trained and talks in
sentences with 10 or more words sometimes yet Steve finds it hard to
believe that my son can verbalize an apology.  I find this especially
humorous since my son is not as verbal as his sister was at this same
age.  Not only can my son verbalize an apology, but he can tell you 6
hours later why he was not allowed to go play with a friend (usually
because he was hitting).  We don't "push" our children academically or
athletically, we were just blessed with bright children.

As far as my degrees are concerned, I think your comment about degrees
being inconsequential is relatively accurate.  My degrees were B.A.'s
and not specific enough to children other than the required courses
regarding Child Development.  My wife's degrees are much more
pertinent, but Steve is incorrect that those of us who have some
training, don't need help.  His response has proven one of his points,
however.  His reponse proves that indeed those of us who take this
seriously and have an education should probably not choose the usenet
to find help.  Perhaps a moderated group would be best next time.

My signature line about moms killing kids was indeed a joke, but not
entirely without some truth.  It seems there is nothing that can fully
prepare a person for parenthood.  Although my wife and I loathe the
thought that ANYTHING would ever happen to our children, it does not
mean that we can not understand how some parents "snap" under the
pressure.  It's far too easy for others to lump such people into some
sort of "crackpot" category which is neither helpful nor accurate.
Nonetheless, I did not mean to offend anyone with that signature, only
to help me find humor in my frustrations.

I do thank you for your time, Susan.
R. Steve Walz - 13 Jul 2004 00:01 GMT
> > My son is very
> > > aggressive and obstinate.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> first year is hard to count since a child that young hardly
> understands discipline,
-------------------
Try 18 years.

> but for the first two years of his life we
> have been exceptionally consistent.  More consistent than any other
> parent-team that we know.  We work well together and do not allow the
> kids to "play" us against each other.
-------------------
This means that you're both paranoids who believe that without
"solidarity" your two year old will triumph over you! Pitiful.

>  As far as corporal punishment
> goes, we never laid a hand on my older child or my younger until just
> recently when my wife's patience with the younger began to reach her
> limits.
---------------------
She should know her limits and not overstep them!!

That she has means she isn't fit to even HAVE children,
which requires ADULT patience and compassion!

> That said even the "agression" from us that you reference was
> not done out of anger.
-----------------------
Irrelevant, wrong is wrong, deny any motive you chose to deny,
it's irrelevant anyway! The immature insecure act of coercion
is the Evil!

> It was done without showing emotion which is
> not always an easy thing to achieve.
--------------------
I'll say, for anyone with a HEART!!
That entire motivation is the sickest thing I've ever heard!
Why would you EVER imagine that NOT having your God-given emotions
that SHOULD have restrained you and given you some gumption could
ever be a "good thing (TM)"!!!!?????????

> We know how important it is to
> take a deep breath and work cognitively and not out of reaction.
------------------------
But you misunderstand what that means!
It means to allow your compassion time to form instead of immature
insecurely irrational reactive behaviors on your part!


> Although I work during the day, when I am home, I take time to play
> with my children as a group and then later on an individual basis.
> Having only 2 kids allows for this.  With my son, I usually end up
> playing Hotwheels, an Old MacDonald farm game, or reading a book to
> him.  This does not necessarily keep him from headbutting, kicking, or
> hitting me in the middle of it.
-------------------------
Any child who hits and bites hates you.

You need to question what it was that you did that made him hate you.
If you fail you must realize that you are regarding something you did
as right, which was instead and in fact a dire WRONG, and that your
stubboren opinions are standing in the way of you grasping the causes
of normal human behavior!!

NO child hits/hates loving parents except by accident. If he has
motive to hit you, it is your fault, and you need to put yourself
in his place and determine why he would hate you if you were not
genuinely "hate-able"!!! If you can't agree with your child, then
you will never be friends and you should stick to the company of
people you won't be able to try to control.

>  Throwing the Hotwheels or other
> objects is pretty common, also.  I consistently responde with a verbal
> reprimand such as "Adam, you may not throw your toys.  Someone may get
> hurt.  If you do it again, you will have to sit in timeout."
----------------------
That is aggressive controlling. It is EXACTLY AS hurting and hating
to him as his behaviors seem to you, that IS EXACTLY why he does it!

If you were treated that way you would want to hit and throw things
at the person attempting it too, you see, we are NOT at ALL different
as children than we are as adults!

If a race of large powerful aliens came down and tried to make adult
humans "pick up their toys" or such, or desist from throwing missles
at them, they would be unsuccessful until they made us frightened out
of our minds, and also emotionally damaged by PTSD.

> I do not get angry or aggressive with him.
=-----------------------
No one cares if you are angry!!!!! All we care about is your response
in adminstering coercion, which insults any human receiving it and
WILL EVERY TIME result in them acting out hate toward you!!!! Why oh
why do parents magically imagine that there is some magical law that
magically makes it "right" to coerce, humiliate, frighten and control
another person MERELY because of their relationship to you!!?? I have
news for you, there isn't one, it's a mistaken social convention in
this sick immature western society, and they aren't born with it, they
are born feeling just like you would if you were manhandled by larger
aliens and were humilated, dishonored, coerced, threatened, and
generally controlled! You would be livid, you would want to poison
their water till they were dead, dead, dead, and you would do so if
you could!! You would kill them in their sleep and burn their f.cking
house down!!

> He will generally then pick up
> another car and throw it although he will usually do it a little less
> enthusiastically as if he's trying to figure out just where I draw the
> line between "throwing" and "dropping".
------------------------
He's not testing you, he's testing his own resolve to resist you!
Why do you make him do that with you, don't you realize that it
is solidifying into a wall between you that will persist into his
adulthood, when he not so secretly despises you?

> Then I tell him that I see he has chosen a timeout.  
--------------------------
He has "CHOSEN" NO SUCH THING, what you're attempting here is nothing
less than mind control, as used by captors on hostage/victims! It
generates so much hate in the recipient from that dishonor of YOU
assuming to define what and how HE thinks, that it produces a very
nearly insurmoutable barrier between you. He will NEVER really love
you or care about you if you do that, and also he will never learn
to really fully care about anyone else, a part of him will always
be about what is in it for him alone, and will reserve to himself
his only true love and care!! In other words, you are destroying
his ability to love!

> I tell him to go sit in the corner for a minute
> until he's ready to listen.  If he runs or does not budge, I tell him,
> "Adam you may walk to the timeout corner yourself or Daddy will carry
> you to the timeout corner.  You pick. If you don't pick, Daddy gets
> to pick."
--------------------
This is another extreme dishonor, the pretense of a false choice. It
is another reprehensible form of attempted mind-control that only
results in deep-seated unspeakable hatred that will secretly glory
in your every disappointment, and finally even in your death!! In
doing this you are again destroying his ability to love anyone, you
are effectivly destroying his life before he has a chance to have one.

Time-outs are just another form of abuse, like beatings, spanking,
and threats of bodily harm, the abusive element is the coercion and
dishonor of his person, not the physical damage.

Kids hurt accidentally don't suffer emotionally for it.

>  After a minute or so he's usually saying he's sorry.
----------------------
Making somone capitulate that way should be reserved for criminals
and prisoners of war who will not comply, it damages the person's
will and their self-esteem in an unalterable way, one that should
NOT be used on children!!! They will never now be able to feel
they are genuine, they have been forced out of their own control
and have been made to imitate rather than feel, they are now acting
their entire life, not living it.


> I walk over to him and kneel down at his level.
--------------------------
Do you really? Why didn't you talk to him sooner? Why didn't you ask
him if he hated you and why? Why didn't you honor him and his own
desires as if he were a real person, one that YOU have to get along
with by modifying YOUR behavior, which is that which makes him a
person, not a thing???

> I ask him why he was in
> timeout and if he understands why he can not throw his toys.  He
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> and being calm and loving is not enough.  Something else must be added
> to our discipline.
---------------------------------------
You need to straighten yourself out, and leave this child the f.ck
alone until you do! The reason it happens over and over at his age
is that his cycle of awareness is all surface, his hatred of you
has not been assauged, he still hates you, and as soon as his terror
of you fades even slightly his hatred of you reasserts itself. It
will continue to do so, trying to find a way he can be real and use
his mind to assert himself in the world until his desire wins a place
for him in his own life. A place where he is honored and his wishes
for himself respected. If that can't be anywhere near you because
you're this stupid, then he will always gravitate toward things you
dislike, just to dishonor you in return for your misbehaviors toward
him. When one is raised in your kind of abuse, one's entire motivation
and hopes and dreams grow around dishonoring you and your abuse!!


> >  I have degrees in Psychology and
> > > Sociology and my wife is a professional child counselor with degrees
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> "Difficult" Types of Children.  Our son definitely fits the
> description of the aggresive child.
--------------------------
There is NO "challenging child", there are only challenging adults.

You are pretending that he is the identified patient in the family,
when the ones who need therapy are looking at you whenever you look
in the mirror!!

> I appreciate some of your comments Susan.  I suspect that you mean
> well.  It appears from some of the other responses, that other people
> on this forum either do not have children or simply contribute to
> further their personal agendas.
-------------------------
Or else you're wrong and can't admit that.
This is the most common situation.
Why would anyone need help with something they COULD understand???

Person walks into a room with blindfold over his eyes and says:
"Turn on the light". Everyone agrees, except the guy without a
blindfold, he says: "It IS on!"

> I was truly seeking assistance, but
> pretty much just got flamed by Steve which I don'd understand since
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> My favorite response is the one by Steve who must either not have
> children this age or has forgotten what they are like.
------------------------------
Ask your child to forgive you, we're adults here. I have two grown
children in their late 20's and early 30's. I haven't forgotten,
but ours WEREN'T "that way" PRECISELY BECAUSE of the way we treated
them! My most treasured possession is a ceramic plaque my son made
me which says, "Thank you for the way that you treat me!"


> My son is
> nearly 3 (in October), is completely potty trained and talks in
> sentences with 10 or more words sometimes yet Steve finds it hard to
> believe that my son can verbalize an apology.
---------------------------
Mine read his first book at three and a half. If your child is amazing
there is all the more reason to treat them like another equal person,
rather than your chattel or serf.

> I find this especially
> humorous since my son is not as verbal as his sister was at this same
> age.  Not only can my son verbalize an apology, but he can tell you 6
> hours later why he was not allowed to go play with a friend (usually
> because he was hitting).  We don't "push" our children academically or
> athletically, we were just blessed with bright children.
-------------------------------
Then all the more reason you should desist from damaging their
self-esteem and their self-image with your mind-control garbage.


> As far as my degrees are concerned, I think your comment about degrees
> being inconsequential is relatively accurate.  My degrees were B.A.'s
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> seriously and have an education should probably not choose the usenet
> to find help.  Perhaps a moderated group would be best next time.
----------------------------------
Your approach was simply such a classic on this group that it was
impossible to tell you from what we call a "troll", a post meant
to ignite old disagreements by mining previous threads of that sort
from Google and then pushing all the hot-buttons.


> My signature line about moms killing kids was indeed a joke, but not
> entirely without some truth.  It seems there is nothing that can fully
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> I do thank you for your time, Susan.
--------------------------------
You will find that your children are as kindly to you as you are TO
them, as honest to you as you are toward them, as understanding as
you are TO them, etc.

Any theory as to "how to control children" is the very reason that
someone thinks they need such a theory. Control of others produces
hatred only, never anything good.

If even once you try to control them, that will destroy your
friendship and you'll have to rebuild it all over again.

If you treat children like you have to treat your friends to even
have any friends, then your children will be your friends.

Then again, if you don't like even your friends, best not have kids!

You guys strike me as "too full of books"!
Steve
Lesa - 13 Jul 2004 11:19 GMT
snipping out certain portions for length

>  With my son, I usually end up
> playing Hotwheels, an Old MacDonald farm game, or reading a book to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> reprimand such as "Adam, you may not throw your toys.  Someone may get
> hurt.  If you do it again, you will have to sit in timeout."

First of all, you need to word your responses differently.  Always give
positive direction.  Tell him "cars drive on the track" or "please drive
your cars".  Keep your directives short and simple, and always praise
positive actions.  Even if he's only driving for a minute or two, tell him
"I like the way your cars are on the track".

Something to consider as well is whose choice these activities were.
Perhaps your son does not want to play hotwheels or Old McDonald.  Let him
choose the activity.  Some of Greenspan's work and readings could be of
benefit.

I do not
> get angry or aggressive with him.  He will generally then pick up
> another car and throw it although he will usually do it a little less
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> you to the timeout corner.  You pick.  If you don't pick, Daddy gets
> to pick."

So you're teaching him that power and might make someone right.  Nice plan
there Dad.  If he becomes aggressive during an activity, don't choose that
activity.  Perhaps this is a child who needs action.  Rather than forcing
him to sit and read, buy a mini trampline and bounce, or take a walk, or go
outdoors and throw a ball.

> >  I have degrees in Psychology and
> > > Sociology and my wife is a professional child counselor with degrees
> > > in Psychology and Counseling,

Big deal.  I also have degrees in psychology and counseling.  When it comes
to your own kids they don't matter in the least.  The emotions come to the
surface and its incredibly hard to utilize what you know.
Page - 14 Jul 2004 02:37 GMT
> snipping out certain portions for length
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> positive actions.  Even if he's only driving for a minute or two, tell him
> "I like the way your cars are on the track".

I understand your point about positive direction although I don't
agree with your examples.  Teaching my son that the cars must go on
the track doesn't allow him enough creative opportunities.  He can
drive them anywhere he likes including up and down my arm or leg as he
sometimes does.

> Something to consider as well is whose choice these activities were.
> Perhaps your son does not want to play hotwheels or Old McDonald.  Let him
> choose the activity.  Some of Greenspan's work and readings could be of
> benefit.

He ALWAYS chooses the activity.  I sometimes ask him if he wants to
play cars since I know he enjoys it, but I do not force him to play
anything.  As long as it's safe, I'm generally game.  Even better if
we can include my other child, but sometimes he just wants one-on-one
time with me and I understand that.

> > until he's ready to listen.  If he runs or does not budge, I tell him,
> > "Adam you may walk to the timeout corner yourself or Daddy will carry
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> So you're teaching him that power and might make someone right.  Nice plan
> there Dad.  If he becomes aggressive during an activity, don't choose that

No.  I'm teaching him that he can make choices.  Choices come with
consequenses.  This comes straight from the "Love and Logic" series of
parenting guides which my wife often teaches.  You can read more on it
here:
http://www.loveandlogic.com/

It's a bit tougher with a two year old.  With older kids a good
example is, "if you will put your clothes in the hamper, I will wash
them."  If the child refuses to do so, they must either learn to wash
their own clothes or wear dirty clothes to school.  This is a natural
consequence.  With a two year old, they aren't fully capable of
understanding those consequences, so it's not as cut and dry, but we
try hard.

> activity.  Perhaps this is a child who needs action.  Rather than forcing
> him to sit and read, buy a mini trampline and bounce, or take a walk, or go
> outdoors and throw a ball.

Definitely! I agree he does indeed need action.  We live in an area
where playing outdoors is difficult, but we do go out and kick the
ball some.  I have him enrolled in a gymnastics class which he seems
to love... almost too much... he can't stand to leave it when it's
over.  We plan to put him in a local soccer league this fall, but it
will take some persuasion since he isn't old enough to qualify.  I'm a
martial artist and have several kicking bags and other pads that he
can hit or kick if he feels the need.  I think it's sometimes
difficult for him to understand that it's okay to kick the bag but not
okay to kick some other things and/or people.  Because of that, I
generally only practice my martial arts after he is asleep.  I have
NEVER forced him to sit and read with me.  Such an act would be a
lesson in futility for me, nor would I want to discourage him from
liking books.  We are anxious to see if soccer helps him relieve some
of that stored energy.

> > >  I have degrees in Psychology and
> > > > Sociology and my wife is a professional child counselor with degrees
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> to your own kids they don't matter in the least.  The emotions come to the
> surface and its incredibly hard to utilize what you know.

Agreed.  I just threw it in so people would understand where I'm
coming from.  I actually don't use my Psych degree much anymore.  I'm
now a computer programmer working on my masters in information
technology.  The Psych degree just helped to give me lots of great
conversation starters not to mention it's how I met my wonderful wife.
Lesa - 14 Jul 2004 11:47 GMT
> > snipping out certain portions for length
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> drive them anywhere he likes including up and down my arm or leg as he
> sometimes does.

Than a simple "cars are for driving".  Whatever you need to give him
positive direction.  I'm not just pulling this out of the air.  I understand
the difficulties and differences that occur when a 2 year old is involved.
I taught preschool for 10 years, 5 of that with special needs kids. giving a
positive direction is very important.  At this age the "not" sometimes is
beyond understanding, and what is heard is "throw".  Give a direction that
indicates the action you with your child to engage in.
Page - 14 Jul 2004 15:46 GMT
> > > snipping out certain portions for length
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> beyond understanding, and what is heard is "throw".  Give a direction that
> indicates the action you with your child to engage in.

Point taken and agreed upon.
Page - 12 Jul 2004 22:08 GMT
> Surely you jest, but if not, Steve will give you a mouthful.
> In the meantime,
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> > aggressive and obstinate.
> (I'm not surprised; why are you? Aggression feeds upon agression.)

I'm afraid that usenet group posting don't allow complete disclosure
of all events and some of my comments have been miscontrued.  The
first year is hard to count since a child that young hardly
understands discipline, but for the first two years of his life we
have been exceptionally consistent.  More consistent than any other
parent-team that we know.  We work well together and do not allow the
kids to "play" us against each other.  As far as corporal punishment
goes, we never laid a hand on my older child or my younger until just
recently when my wife's patience with the younger began to reach her
limits.  That said even the "agression" from us that you reference was
not done out of anger.  It was done without showing emotion which is
not always an easy thing to achieve.  We know how important it is to
take a deep breath and work cognitively and not out of reaction.

Although I work during the day, when I am home, I take time to play
with my children as a group and then later on an individual basis.
Having only 2 kids allows for this.  With my son, I usually end up
playing Hotwheels, an Old MacDonald farm game, or reading a book to
him.  This does not necessarily keep him from headbutting, kicking, or
hitting me in the middle of it.  Throwing the Hotwheels or other
objects is pretty common, also.  I consistently responde with a verbal
reprimand such as "Adam, you may not throw your toys.  Someone may get
hurt.  If you do it again, you will have to sit in timeout."  I do not
get angry or aggressive with him.  He will generally then pick up
another car and throw it although he will usually do it a little less
enthusiastically as if he's trying to figure out just where I draw the
line between "throwing" and "dropping".  Then I tell him that I see he
has chosen a timeout.  I tell him to go sit in the corner for a minute
until he's ready to listen.  If he runs or does not budge, I tell him,
"Adam you may walk to the timeout corner yourself or Daddy will carry
you to the timeout corner.  You pick.  If you don't pick, Daddy gets
to pick."  After a minute or so he's usually saying he's sorry.  I
walk over to him and kneel down at his level.  I ask him why he was in
timeout and if he understands why he can not throw his toys.  He
explains that he threw a toy and it could hurt somebody.  I then give
him a big hug tell him I love him and resume playing whatever game he
chooses.  Within a few minutes, the cycle repeats itself until
bedtime.  Then I get an hour or so to spend with my daughter.  This is
how every evening goes.  In short, timeouts are not doing the trick
and being calm and loving is not enough.  Something else must be added
to our discipline.

>  I have degrees in Psychology and
> > Sociology and my wife is a professional child counselor with degrees
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> think your young son gets the aggression, if not learned from the people who
> are inflicting it upon him?

With the exception of the two or three previously mentioned
transgressions, we do not exhibit violence in our home.  I am very
against it and my wife even more so. We are in the process of reading
a few books on challenging kids.  Some offer some very good insight.
I believe the one that is helping us the most right now is titled, The
Challenging Child: Understanding, Raising, and Enjoying the Five
"Difficult" Types of Children.  Our son definitely fits the
description of the aggresive child.

> Susan

I appreciate some of your comments Susan.  I suspect that you mean
well.  It appears from some of the other responses, that other people
on this forum either do not have children or simply contribute to
further their personal agendas.  I was truly seeking assistance, but
pretty much just got flamed by Steve which I don'd understand since
one would think that this would be a good place to vent frustrations,
gather thoughts, get suggestions, and formulate a new plan-of-attack.
Pardon the "violent" expression.

My favorite response is the one by Steve who must either not have
children this age or has forgotten what they are like.  My son is
nearly 3 (in October), is completely potty trained and talks in
sentences with 10 or more words sometimes yet Steve finds it hard to
believe that my son can verbalize an apology.  I find this especially
humorous since my son is not as verbal as his sister was at this same
age.  Not only can my son verbalize an apology, but he can tell you 6
hours later why he was not allowed to go play with a friend (usually
because he was hitting).  We don't "push" our children academically or
athletically, we were just blessed with bright children.

As far as my degrees are concerned, I think your comment about degrees
being inconsequential is relatively accurate.  My degrees were B.A.'s
and not specific enough to children other than the required courses
regarding Child Development.  My wife's degrees are much more
pertinent, but Steve is incorrect that those of us who have some
training, don't need help.  His response has proven one of his points,
however.  His reponse proves that indeed those of us who take this
seriously and have an education should probably not choose the usenet
to find help.  Perhaps a moderated group would be best next time.

My signature line about moms killing kids was indeed a joke, but not
entirely without some truth.  It seems there is nothing that can fully
prepare a person for parenthood.  Although my wife and I loathe the
thought that ANYTHING would ever happen to our children, it does not
mean that we can not understand how some parents "snap" under the
pressure.  It's far too easy for others to lump such people into some
sort of "crackpot" category which is neither helpful nor accurate.
Nonetheless, I did not mean to offend anyone with that signature, only
to help me find humor in my frustrations.

I do thank you for your time, Susan.
dragonlady - 13 Jul 2004 00:00 GMT
> > Surely you jest, but if not, Steve will give you a mouthful.
> > In the meantime,
[quoted text clipped - 124 lines]
>
> I do thank you for your time, Susan.

Time outs are not particularly effective with LOTS of kids, anything
over two minutes is WAY too long for a two year old, and it sounds like
absolutely the wrong solution to throwing hot wheels.  A better solution
would be to say, "I see you need to throw things.  When you throw
hotwheels, you might hurt something or someone, so we'll put them up and
get out the nerf balls and take them outside so you can throw."  At the
very least, hotwheels ARE an object that ought not be thrown, and there
should BE no second chance:  I'd put them up and out of reach the FIRST
time they get thrown, every time.  (IOW, don't put the CHILD in a time
out -- put the toys with which he is risking injury in a time out.)

Clearly, time outs aren't working with your son.  One definition of
insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting
different results.  So you have to do something else, and it makes more
sense to me to try to figure out what need of his is not being met.  
Maybe he just needs LOTS more physically agressive play:  jumping and
climbing and throwing.  Your description doesn't sound like he's doing
it out of anger or to try to hurt someone -- he just needs something he
isn't getting.  Figuring out what it is and trying to provide it is MUCH
more likely to be successful than continuing to turn everything into a
power struggle between parent and child.

If, on the other hand, he IS trying to hurt someone, and doing it
frequently, your and your wife's expertise notwithstanding, you might
need to spend time with a professional to understand the roots of his
anger.

As far as spanking without emotion -- frankly, that gives me the
willies!  I'd much rather see a parent obviously angry and at the end of
their tether spank a child, than the cold blooded, calm inflicting of
pain that you describe!

And many of us understand the humor;  I remember days suggesting to my
partner that a kid shaped hole in the wall might be an interesting
interior design addition to our home . . .

As far as Steve goes, ignore the overblown rhetoric, and listen to what
he says beneath that.  Fundamentally, he is talking about a profound
respect for the child -- something I see in far too few adults.
Signature

Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care

Page - 13 Jul 2004 14:31 GMT
> Time outs are not particularly effective with LOTS of kids, anything
> over two minutes is WAY too long for a two year old, and it sounds like
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> time they get thrown, every time.  (IOW, don't put the CHILD in a time
> out -- put the toys with which he is risking injury in a time out.)

Excellent suggestion.  We had decided that being physical is a
definite need for him.  I don't know that I want to encourage throwing
per se because often when we go outside, he'll throw rocks, but I
definitely like the concept of taking him outside and maybe giving him
a ball to kick.  You're definitely right about time outs not working.

> Your description doesn't sound like he's doing
> it out of anger or to try to hurt someone -- he just needs something he
> isn't getting.  Figuring out what it is and trying to provide it is MUCH
> more likely to be successful than continuing to turn everything into a
> power struggle between parent and child.

Bingo!  Every activity with my son seems to be a power struggle.  My
first child was a diservice to us since she does anything we ask.  It
is somewhat frustrating to feel like every activity requires at least
one correction of some sort with my son.  But we aren't going anywhere
and generally have plenty of patience, so we'll keep working on it.

> If, on the other hand, he IS trying to hurt someone, and doing it
> frequently, your and your wife's expertise notwithstanding, you might
> need to spend time with a professional to understand the roots of his
> anger.

We've discussed this.  We are proponents of seeking counseling even
during good times, so it seems only natural that we would seek it
during rough ones.  My posting to the newsgroup was done on a day when
my frustration was peaked and really just wanted to vent anonymously.
My mother, my wife, and one of my mother's sisters are all
professional counselors.  Not to mention all the professional
counseling friends that come with such work experience, so we have
quite a large resource pool to pull from.  I should have gone to them
first, but as I said, posting to the newsgroup was more about venting
than resolving.  My wife and I are also active readers of self-help
books including those on parenting and relationships.

> As far as spanking without emotion -- frankly, that gives me the
> willies!  I'd much rather see a parent obviously angry and at the end of
> their tether spank a child, than the cold blooded, calm inflicting of
> pain that you describe!

Perhaps, but have you read any of the mainstream books lately?  They
pretty much all agree that when you punish a child (spanking, time
outs, etc.) it should be done without anger or notable frustration.
The point is that you don't want to teach your kid that it's
appropriate to act out at people out of anger.  Coming from a father
who nearly always acted out of anger and yelled a lot (although I
wasn't really spanked), I can understand where they are coming from.
When I take a moment to breathe, I am able to handle my son patiently
and lovingly.  I suppose "emotionless" is not as accurate as
"anger-free".

> And many of us understand the humor;  I remember days suggesting to my
> partner that a kid shaped hole in the wall might be an interesting
> interior design addition to our home . . .

:-D

> As far as Steve goes, ignore the overblown rhetoric, and listen to what
> he says beneath that.  Fundamentally, he is talking about a profound
> respect for the child -- something I see in far too few adults.

After his first response, I don't read his postings.  He claims that
he is against violence of any kind but his postings are filled with
violence, hate, and complete disrespect to visitors of this forum.  He
demonizes the very people that are simply trying to get suggestions
from others.  If his point was simply to stop spanking children, then
he's preaching to the choir.  To think that because I have spanked my
son once or maybe twice doesn't mean that I'm in favor of spanking...
it means I lost my cool.  Since I'm only human, I realized my mistake
and sought help here.  My children get more attention and love from us
than any children I've ever known.  My wife stays home with the kids
all but two days each week when she is counseling and I am home every
night by 5:30.  We play, we read, we talk, we wrestle, and sometimes
we just snuggle.  Oh yes, and occassionally we watch television.  That
will be the one sentence that Steve picks out to suggest that I'm a
horrible parent... that we sometimes watch television.

I'll just leave it as "he has issues" and should definitely seek
counseling.  My first reaction is that he may have had a violent
childhood and for that he has my sympathy.
dragonlady - 14 Jul 2004 02:57 GMT
> > Time outs are not particularly effective with LOTS of kids, anything
> > over two minutes is WAY too long for a two year old, and it sounds like
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> definitely like the concept of taking him outside and maybe giving him
> a ball to kick.  You're definitely right about time outs not working.

You can still encourage throwing -- you just have to be very, very clear
about what can be thrown where.  So it means buying lots of cheap nerf
balls (or whatever else is cheap and you don't mind losing) and showing
him where and when it's safe to throw.  Or taking him to a lake to let
him throw rocks in the water (one of MY favorite leisure activities!)  
Let's face it, it doesn't sound like this child needs encouragement to
throw -- he LIKES to throw, and is doing it anyway -- what he needs is a
parent who can facilitate him learning when and where it's SAFE to
throw, and then letting him throw to his little heart's content.  Who
knows, you could have a burgeoning pitcher on your hands!

> > Your description doesn't sound like he's doing
> > it out of anger or to try to hurt someone -- he just needs something he
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> one correction of some sort with my son.  But we aren't going anywhere
> and generally have plenty of patience, so we'll keep working on it.

Boy, is this familiar!  My now 18 year old daughter never met a power
struggle she didn't want to engage!  However, I learned when she was
very young that the best way to work with her was to avoid them if at
all possible.  I'm not the best at avoiding power struggles, so I
watched people who seemed to be better -- people like my mom, and,
later, the director at her theater program -- for clues about how to do
it.  Basically, the people who work best with my daughter -- the people
she responds to, the people who she ends up respecting and working well
with -- are the people who seem unconcerned about whether or not she
respects their position of authority.  Those who want to be absolutely
certain that she knows who is in charge -- man, those are generally
total disasters.  

I wish I could explain the power struggle avoidance strategies better.  
You just don't engage -- you step aside.  So, in the case of a child who
is throwing things, you don't try to get them to stop, you direct the
throwing to an appropriate area.  If you absolutely have to stop an
activity because it's dangerous, you do it quickly and with as little
fuss as possible.

My daughter has had a troubled teen period,  but is doing much better
now.  I've always said that when she learned to differentiate between
important battles and NOT important ones, her tenacity and single
mindedness would serve her well.  She's beginning to turn into a great
grown up.  But it's been difficult, so if she's as much like your son as
it sounds like, hang on for a bumpy -- but frequently rewarding! -- ride.

> > If, on the other hand, he IS trying to hurt someone, and doing it
> > frequently, your and your wife's expertise notwithstanding, you might
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> and lovingly.  I suppose "emotionless" is not as accurate as
> "anger-free".

And I think the current experts are full of crap.  I think it is
entirely appropriate for a child to know when they have done something
that makes you angry -- that's a natural consequence.  I'm not talking
about raging at a child, but corporal punishment done calmly has always
given me the creeps.  Man, the thought of someone calmly and
methodically and without being upset deliberately HURTING me . . .  I'd
rather see that they are angry and don't know what else to do with their
anger than think they are capable of inflicting pain when they are NOT
angry.

If I thought corporal punishment was EVER appropriate, I suppose I'd
think it ought to be done with the same deliberation and relative calm
as other consequences -- but since I don't, I can't imagine doing it
UNLESS I was at my wit's end and very angry -- and I have, on rare
occassion, but have always known it represented a failure on my part.
Signature

Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care

Page - 14 Jul 2004 15:57 GMT
[snipped]

> > Perhaps, but have you read any of the mainstream books lately?  They
> > pretty much all agree that when you punish a child (spanking, time
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> UNLESS I was at my wit's end and very angry -- and I have, on rare
> occassion, but have always known it represented a failure on my part.

Keep in mind you are talking about corporal punishment which my wife
and I don't believe is necessary for 99.99% of all children.  The few
times we have engaged it were due to our own failure to stay calm.  It
takes quite a bit to push our buttons, but it does happen.  I don't
see anything wrong with being calm and concerned when I tell my son
that hitting me is not nice and it makes me angry.  I don't believe
that I have to show my anger by raising my voice or hand.  I simply
calmly and in a controlled manner tell my son that when he hits me, I
get angry.  If he hits others, they may get angry, get hurt, and/or
hit back.  Then I sometimes ask him if he thinks he would like to get
hit.  He understands well enough to answer "no", so I think he gets
it.  It's more of an act before he thinks behavior I believe.

You seem to be thinking that I would move and act like a robot.
That's probably just a limitation on using the usenet for conversation
or a failure on my part to communicate effectively in this forum.  I'm
kind of a "write before I think" person... guess my son gets it from
his old man.  I just wish he was a bit more passive like me.  Hitting
others was never a problem for me.
Lesa - 14 Jul 2004 21:46 GMT
> [snipped]
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> see anything wrong with being calm and concerned when I tell my son
> that hitting me is not nice and it makes me angry.

I agree with the willies issue here.  The fact that you just stated that you
calmly tell your son that you're angry with him and are going to hit him
becuase of it is horrid.  I don't understand how you can state that you do
this, yet state that you don't present violence to him.  Not only are you
presenting violence, but you are justifying that this violence is ok becuase
he made you angry.
dragonlady - 14 Jul 2004 23:02 GMT
> > dragonlady <mehouck@REMOVEpacbell.net> wrote in message
> news:<mehouck-6486B7.18581413072004@news.SF.sbcglobal.net>...
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> presenting violence, but you are justifying that this violence is ok becuase
> he made you angry.

As I read through this this, I think I'm getting more confused.

On the one hand, you say you don't believe in spanking most of the time,
but your son got spanked because you reached the end of your rope.

On the other, you say the spanking was done calmly.

If you were able to stay calm, then you had the control to NOT spank --
you can't have it both ways!

And I still say that calmly telling a child that you're going to hurt
them is creepier than  letting the child see that you are angry, at the
end of your rope, and didn't know what else to do.

(Plus I've always thought that spanking a child to "teach" them that
hitting other people isn't OK is, at best, silly!  Is it really OK to
hit people only when you're bigger than them so you can get away with
it?)

meh
Signature

Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care

qgonjon - 15 Jul 2004 14:06 GMT
If you are doing the right thing, don't worry much.  Kids are all
different.  I had a similar problem with my two daughters.  One was very
easy to handle and the other one too difficult.

The easy one had more attention when she was a baby while the second one
didn't.  Then I decided to compensate that attention and I guess it's
working.  Now she is five, and so far, I had no complains from her
school.  She is very smart and she tells me every day that she loves me :).

She expects everything to be fair according to her, she is very
imposing, but she seems to be turning into a good girl.
R. Steve Walz - 11 Jul 2004 02:47 GMT
> I have a two year old son (will be 3 in October 2004) who is not
> responding to our disciplinary tactics.  We have a 6 year old daughter
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the fact that he is a boy and some of it because he is the second
> child.  Regardless of the reasons, we are at our wits end.
------------------
If you're real you need to shut the f.ck up more. You need to sit
down and listen and watch him, and quit trying to control him.


> We don't take such a claim lightly.  I have degrees in Psychology and
> Sociology and my wife is a professional child counselor with degrees
> in Psychology and Counseling, so we've tried most of the standard
> recommendations.
--------------------
You're a f.cking lying troll!
People with that kind of experience neither need advice from Usenet
nor are they so stupid that they seek it there.


> We try to first set a good example and provide a loving home with
> plenty of encouragement and positive reinforcement for desired
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> someone again.  We've tried redirecting his behavior to a new
> activity, but this is sometimes harder than it sounds
-------------------------
You're a f.cking liar, two year olds aren't that verbal, nor would he
even understand such a statement as you are claiming that you try to
elicit from him!


> My wife and I are disgusted with ourselves since we have resorted to
> tactics that we swore we would never engage.  For example, I have
> spanked him a few times which is something our first child has never
> required.  Twice my wife has bitten him back to show him how it feels
> when he bites her.  Neither of us think this is a good way to deal
> with his behavior, but we feel we are running out of options.
-----------------------------
You're a trolling shithead. You merely filtered the last such argument
from this group for key phrases and themes and planted this piece of
sh.t here hoping it would grow and fester!!
Steve
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.