> It was actually a day before my due date, they did a strip on her in
> the hospital and she didn't show any signs of distress so we figured
> she likely would be OK.
and even meconium caused by distress isn't that often a problem, even if the
meconium is then aspirated, again, it's also not always a problem, I can
only find estimated figures, meconium seems to be aspirated about 35% of the
time that it is present in the water and if it's aspirated, only causes
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome 5-10% of the time and it's thought that these
cases are marked by severe distress (hypoxia or asphyxia) in the womb,
rather than bad luck with passing meconium, aspirating it and so on -
healthy lungs can deal with the meconium they've inhaled, meaning only
minimal suctioning to clear the airways is required, it's unhealthy lungs
that have problems.
My daughter (2nd child) had passed meconium, as she was born at 39+3 and it
was old, so passed several days earlier, so at that gestation, likely to be
distress of some sort that was temporary, she was also intermittently
distressed in labour, but the mec wasn't found until ARM well into 2nd
stage, at which point she was fine.
I just relooked at the figures as to how often it occurs, 50% at 42 weeks
was a correct recollection, but it's 30% at 40 weeks, which was higher than
I expected and overall 12-13% - it's a surprisingly common birth problem,
but one that only a small amount of the time means there is a problem, it
does make sense to me that if you are in a hospital then get the
paediatrician into the room, but not an absolute reason to transfer from a
homebirth, I think had my daughters birth been at home as planned, I would
have transferred, even though it was old, she was intermittently not showing
great signs, but on the other hand, the circumstances that turned into a
hospital birth anyway, may well have been what caused her some distress
prior to labour, so it's probably all irrelevant.
I guess meconium is a hard subject for parents, stories like cjra's and
angelina are thankfully rare, but knowing that these things do happen,
seeing meconium can be very worrying, when often it isn't and doctors and
midwives don't always help - most of the understanding about what is going
on it newish, the main research paper is 1992 and it takes time for that to
pass into teaching and practice, so for moderate numbers of care providers,
meconium still implies panic.
Anne
Elle - 29 Apr 2007 01:30 GMT
> I guess meconium is a hard subject for parents, stories like cjra's and
> angelina are thankfully rare, but knowing that these things do happen,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Anne
They definitely weren't panicking but it is protocol at this hospital
to have a ped standing by for consult when a baby is born with
meconium in the water. The water was quite dirty, with my first
daughter they thought it might be stained with meconium so to speak
but were kind of holding the chux pad up to the light etc to see if
they could agree that there was anything there -- we settled on
"no" :)
I already knew the potential implications but the nurse explained them
pretty throroughly and calmly. I think meconium in the water is quite
common, lots of people I know had it. Amelia was quite covered in poop
when she emerged!
Elle