Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Pregnancy / Pregnancy / June 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Second babies

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Lina - 21 Jun 2004 03:23 GMT
Is it normal to be afraid to have a second baby????
Alena's almost one, and it's a possibility that we're having our second, but
I've found myself petrified of the idea!

Is this normal???
Daye - 21 Jun 2004 03:25 GMT
>Is it normal to be afraid to have a second baby????

Yes, especially if the first pregnancy or birth was bad.  After I
developed severe PE and had to have an emergency c/s, I was afraid.
But I got over it.  Faster than you did.

My bf had her baby about 8 months ago, and she is afraid to get
pregnant again.

--
Daye
Momma to Jayan and Leopold
See Jayan and Leo: http://www.aloofhosting.com/jayleo/
Updated 28 Feb 2004
Sophie - 21 Jun 2004 12:40 GMT
> >Is it normal to be afraid to have a second baby????

I found the transition to 2 the hardest, so I'd say it's normal.  Adding #3
was easy, and I really can't say I'm worried about adding #4, except that
lack of sleep.

> Yes, especially if the first pregnancy or birth was bad.  After I
> developed severe PE and had to have an emergency c/s, I was afraid.
> But I got over it.  Faster than you did.

I don't know about that.  I know L's birth was my 3rd but it was pretty bad
and I already knew before I left the hospital I'd have another.

> My bf had her baby about 8 months ago, and she is afraid to get
> pregnant again.
>
> --
> Daye

Why "afraid"?
Jill - 21 Jun 2004 17:40 GMT
> I found the transition to 2 the hardest, so I'd say it's normal.  Adding #3
> was easy, and I really can't say I'm worried about adding #4,

I believe this. I can see it with myself-- #2 will be a different world from
just having one and that's what I am worried about. But once you have more
than 1, it seems you can keep going without too much more difficulty. But
IMO adding #2 seems to be a HUGE adjustment!!
Daye - 21 Jun 2004 20:43 GMT
>> My bf had her baby about 8 months ago, and she is afraid to get
>> pregnant again.
>
>Why "afraid"?

Maybe afraid is the wrong word, but she doesn't want to be pregnant
again.  She doesn't want to deal with having the baby (she had an
emergency c/s with her first).  She has a lot of reasons (or excuses)
why she doesn't want baby #2.  

I just tell her that she has to do what is right for her and her
family.  Her DH wants another baby.  I am so glad that I had Leopold,
even though the pregnancy was hell, I didn't like the c/s, and I got
severe PPD from it all.  I love my little boy, and I tell her that.  I
would do it all again to get my little Leo.  

--
Daye
Momma to Jayan and Leopold
See Jayan and Leo: http://www.aloofhosting.com/jayleo/
Updated 28 Feb 2004
Jill - 21 Jun 2004 22:03 GMT
"Daye" <daye@australia.edu> wrote
I tell her that.  I
> would do it all again to get my little Leo.

I would do it all over again, exactly like it was with no changes, to have
my Rachel as well. It was definitely worth it , no doubt!!

In fact....I would agree to do it all over again with NO complaints!! The
end result has made me the happiest I have ever been in my life. Even though
there has been tough times with moods and little problems...one little smile
from Rachel and I melt. :)

I have a friend or two who claims to be phobic of labor or pregnancy
etc...and this is all I tell them-- that the end is way more than worth it.
Enough said. People always told me that and I did believe it and realize
that it would be, but you just don't know until you get there, how great it
feels!

Jill
Lina - 22 Jun 2004 01:30 GMT
> > --
> > Daye
>
> Why "afraid"?

I'm afraid because of all the health problems Alena had and all the problems
she has now. I know they're because she was a premie, but if I'm pregnant
now, Alena won't even be 2 and I'll be involved with a newborn. If the new
baby is sick like she was, that's 3 weeks of hospital time with little to no
support at home for me, Allan and now Alena.
It's a scary prospect.
Jill - 21 Jun 2004 17:37 GMT
"Daye" <daye@australia.edu> wrote >
> My bf had her baby about 8 months ago, and she is afraid to get
> pregnant again.
>
> --

Sounds normal to me. I have already forgotten so much about the bad points
of labor and pregnancy (the panic attacks, the long labor with the
wearing-off epidural etc, the morning sickness that never went away...)
etc.....but believe it or not, THAT is not what makes me afraid to have
another baby.

I wouls like another baby when Rachel gets to a certain age. I.e., old
enough that I won't have them too close together or too far apart for me.
But with Rachel, it's JUST her, and she is all I have to worry about.
Everything can center around her. I am afraid to be pregnant with a
toddler/child and have to worry about taking care of myself if I have
another rough pregnancy while caring for Rachel. I won't be able to just lie
down whenever I want, or have the luxury to avoid anything and everything
that makes me nauseous etc. There will be responsibilities that I have. And
also I am afraid of what it will be like AFTER I have the second baby, all
the new issues that could be- sibling rivalry, making each child happy, time
management, etc.

I am enjoying Rachel so much. I am afraid with a second child, it will not
feel this easy and good, it will be more stressful- much more so- and much
less relaxing. It's tough to watch after Rachel, because it takes up 95% of
my time- I feel like all I do is feed her, change her, and then hold her and
play with her to keep her from crying since she cries when EVER she is put
down. This is good with me-- but with another child in the mix to care for
this way...would be so hard with 2!!! 2 different ages, 2 different sets of
needs, each just as important and each just as demanding of my
time/attention/care.

It feels like it will be soooo hard!! How do you guys with multiple kids do
it.....I remember Sophie saying it is all about routine. Routines and time
management are not my strong suits, since I have always until now just done
what I feel, when I want to as much as possible (with the obvious exception
of working full time-- but on my own time, it';s been no routine, just doing
what I feel)...
Daye - 21 Jun 2004 20:47 GMT
>It's tough to watch after Rachel, because it takes up 95% of
>my time- I feel like all I do is feed her, change her, and then hold her and
>play with her to keep her from crying since she cries when EVER she is put
>down.

Jayan had to be able to see me.  I could not be out of her sight or
she would cry.  So she would be put in the pram and rolled to where
ever I had to do something.  I even took her to the toilet with me.

Remember, every baby is different.  I thought that Leopold would be
like that too.  So I was prepared to have him around me all the time.
He could care less.  He is prefectly happy to play in the floor while
I am in another room.  Or look out the window and I am not in his line
of sight.

Leo is much more laid back than Jayan.  He is a very secure baby.  He
knows that I am around.  If he cries, I come to see what is wrong, but
he doesn't need me 24/7 like Jayan did.  But he loves having my
attention, don't get me wrong.

--
Daye
Momma to Jayan and Leopold
See Jayan and Leo: http://www.aloofhosting.com/jayleo/
Updated 28 Feb 2004
D&K Condron - 21 Jun 2004 03:39 GMT
> Is it normal to be afraid to have a second baby????
> Alena's almost one, and it's a possibility that we're having our second, but
> I've found myself petrified of the idea!
>
> Is this normal???

I don't know if it's "normal" or not, but my son will be four in October and
I am still terrified at the thought of another one.  And I had a good
delivery and he's been great (maybe that's the problem - everything has been
so wonderful with him that I'm afraid I have nowhere to go but down?).

My husband jokes that I am the only woman in the world who does a happy
dance each month when her period starts ;)

Katrina
Maria Danielle Darst - 25 Jun 2004 04:55 GMT
> My husband jokes that I am the only woman in the world who does a happy
> dance each month when her period starts ;)
>
> Katrina

You are not the only one....*lol* :)

But in keeping with this thread, having #1 was a bit of an adjustment...not
as major an upheaval as I originally envisioned...but overall not bad at
all. :)

Adding #2 has seemed to bring about the most changes. According to my
mother, after that it wasn't difficult to add one more (there were 3 of us).

Maria
Kelly 2/19/00
Kyle 7/9/01
Em - 25 Jun 2004 20:53 GMT
"Maria Danielle Darst" <mdarst@satx.rr.com> wrote in message
> "D&K Condron" <condrons1997@comcast.net> wrote in message

> > My husband jokes that I am the only woman in the world who does a happy
> > dance each month when her period starts ;)
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> as major an upheaval as I originally envisioned...but overall not bad at
> all. :)

Hmm. This makes me wonder. #1 *was* a major upheaval and huge adjustment
for me (he was a very planned baby, too), so does that mean I'm doomed
when hypothetical #2 comes along? I've been hoping that adjusting to two
will be easier to adjusting to one, since I will already be in "kid
mode" when #2 comes along. It has been pretty hard for me to adjust to
the constantness of childrearing as well as the loss of personal freedom
(something I feel very keenly). Uh oh. Maybe I will look back at these
days with #1 as being full of freedom once compared to having two?!

--
Em
mama to L-baby, 9 months old
Ericka Kammerer - 25 Jun 2004 22:08 GMT
> Hmm. This makes me wonder. #1 *was* a major upheaval and huge adjustment
> for me (he was a very planned baby, too), so does that mean I'm doomed
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> (something I feel very keenly). Uh oh. Maybe I will look back at these
> days with #1 as being full of freedom once compared to having two?!

    I think it depends.  If your pre-baby life was
very kid-unfriendly, then you might find 0-1 worse than
1-2.  If your pre-baby life was fairly amenable to
adding kids, then 0-1 might not seem so bad, but 1-2
might seem much worse.  Or maybe you'd find both
difficult ;-)
    In our case, 0-1 wasn't too bad. It didn't
change our lifestyle a lot.  I did get tired of the
constant parenting, but on the other hand, if DH
had the baby, I could be off duty.  Once #2 came
along, things were more limited.  A toddler and a
baby are less portable than just a baby, and if
DH had one kid, I still had other.  (DH sometimes
took both kids, of course, but in the everyday
back-and-forth of life, it was harder to get off
duty without totally leaving the house.)

Best wishes,
Ericka
Chotii - 25 Jun 2004 23:11 GMT
> > Hmm. This makes me wonder. #1 *was* a major upheaval and huge adjustment
> > for me (he was a very planned baby, too), so does that mean I'm doomed
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> back-and-forth of life, it was harder to get off
> duty without totally leaving the house.)

Well....

I honestly don't know. I went from 1 to 3, and then added a 4th.  It's a
rare, rare day when I get out without taking at least ONE with me (but then,
doing errands with just one feels like freedom!)  That said, on weekends, I
usually go out by myself for a couple of hours (having nursed the baby just
before I leave) and DH has all 4 kids for the whole time. I do have to LEAVE
to be 'off duty', but this is possible, and my DH encourages it for my
sanity.

--angela
Ericka Kammerer - 26 Jun 2004 03:16 GMT
> I honestly don't know. I went from 1 to 3, and then added a 4th.  It's a
> rare, rare day when I get out without taking at least ONE with me (but then,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> to be 'off duty', but this is possible, and my DH encourages it for my
> sanity.

    Oh, I do the same (though with 3 rather than 4).
It's just that when we only had one, if we were out to
dinner (or anywhere else, for that matter), it was easy
to just pass baby duty fluidly back and forth between
the two of us.  We could both eat and get in conversation
with other people.  With two, all of a sudden most of
that disappeared.  If DH was paying attention to the
needs of one, that didn't mean I didn't have to pay
attention to the other.  Dinners out and visiting with
other people got a lot more fragmented.  With only one
child, we kept up our usual social routine with little
trouble.  With two, it made a more significant dent in
that sort of thing.

Best wishes,
Ericka
Sophie - 26 Jun 2004 13:01 GMT
> > I think it depends.  If your pre-baby life was
> > very kid-unfriendly, then you might find 0-1 worse than
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> > back-and-forth of life, it was harder to get off
> > duty without totally leaving the house.)

That was us.  Adding 1 was fine, adding 2 was awful. Adding 3 was maybe the
easiest.

> Well....
>
> I honestly don't know. I went from 1 to 3, and then added a 4th.  It's a
> rare, rare day when I get out without taking at least ONE with me (but then,
> doing errands with just one feels like freedom!)

Lol.  So many moms of 2 or more say the same-  it's so easy to run errands
with only one.

>That said, on weekends, I
> usually go out by myself for a couple of hours (having nursed the baby just
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> --angela

I go by myself on a weekend, or more often my husband will take 2 or 3 kids
and go do something with them.  I like that better, being in the house
*alone*  :)
Nancy P - 26 Jun 2004 00:19 GMT
>> Hmm. This makes me wonder. #1 *was* a major upheaval and huge adjustment
> for me (he was a very planned baby, too), so does that mean I'm doomed
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> (something I feel very keenly). Uh oh. Maybe I will look back at these
> days with #1 as being full of freedom once compared to having two?!

I'm 9 weeks into baby #2 and DD1 is 2 yr, 4 months.  For the reasons you
stated above, the transition from 1 - 2 is nothing compared to transitioning
from 0 - 1 was for me.  I just bring her along to whatever... The only thing
that's hard is not having the hours after DD1 goes to bed to myself, but DD2
is pretty mellow anyway.

Nancy
Leslie - 26 Jun 2004 00:44 GMT
Em said:

>Hmm. This makes me wonder. #1 *was* a major upheaval and huge adjustment
>for me (he was a very planned baby, too), so does that mean I'm doomed
>when hypothetical #2 comes along? I've been hoping that adjusting to two
>will be easier to adjusting to one, since I will already be in "kid
>mode" when #2 comes along.

I think you are talking about two different kinds of adjustment here, kwim?
From 0-1, you are adjusting to being a mother, having a child, having a
different kind of relationship with your husband, changing your priorities,
having a new image of yourself . . . From 1-2, the adjustment is just managing
the needs of two babies instead of one, managing your time better, learning to
split your attention . . . so when I say going from 1-2 is the hardest
adjustment, that's the kinds of things I am talking about, just the sheer labor
that is involved with caring for two and meeting two little ones' needs more or
less at the same time.

It has been pretty hard for me to adjust to
>the constantness of childrearing as well as the loss of personal freedom
>(something I feel very keenly). Uh oh. Maybe I will look back at these
>days with #1 as being full of freedom once compared to having two?!

I certainly look back on having only one child and think how easy it was
relative to having four.  However, it's not really easy going through it!  I
have a six-year space between 3 and 4, so I have gotten to experience having
only one baby while having all the knowledge from having had so many, and
having lived through the chaos of three toddlers at once, and let me tell you,
it was a breeze!

Leslie

Emily (2/4/91)
Jake (1/27/94)
Teddy (2/15/95)
William (3/5/01 -- VBA3C, 13 lbs. 5 oz.)
and Lorelei, expected 11/2/04

"Children come trailing clouds of glory from God, which is their home."
                   ~ William Wordsworth
Nikki - 26 Jun 2004 07:23 GMT
> Hmm. This makes me wonder. #1 *was* a major upheaval and huge
> adjustment for me (he was a very planned baby, too), so does that
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Maybe I will look back at these days with #1 as being full of freedom
> once compared to having two?!

Nah - the life style change for me going from 0-1 was enormous.  I found
going from 1-2 much easier.  The first year especially since #2 was an easy
baby.   Getting places and doing things was harder when my youngest was 18
months to nearly 3yo.  Partly because he wasn't such an easy toddler, partly
because my oldest was not very independent at all yet, and partly because
there was a winter in there.  I don't do winters very well!
--
Nikki
Mama to Hunter (5) and Luke (3)
Plissken - 21 Jun 2004 04:06 GMT
> Is it normal to be afraid to have a second baby????
> Alena's almost one, and it's a possibility that we're having our second, but
> I've found myself petrified of the idea!
>
> Is this normal??

I hope it is because even though this was planned, I'm a little afraid. I'm
not at all afraid of the labour/delivery because with Maddy it wasn't nearly
as bad as I had expected and I *know* I can do it again. What I'm afraid of
is looking after two children and one of them being two (she is already
starting to have quite the temper!). I've had some friends say two children
are "no problem" then there is my best friend who said "it's not twice as
hard it's 100 times harder". I hope I'm the "no problem" type of person :o)

Nadene
Alissa - 21 Jun 2004 05:48 GMT
> Is it normal to be afraid to have a second baby????
> Alena's almost one, and it's a possibility that we're having our second, but
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I've just had my 2nd and I was so not excited, thinking how on earth I'd
manage with 2 of them, so far it's been easy, emotionally I feel great, sure
DD is a bit out of sorts but I am so much more relaxed about things this
time round. But hey it's only been 13 days, it all may fall appart any
minute I guess.
Alissa
Marion Boulden - 21 Jun 2004 13:24 GMT
> Is it normal to be afraid to have a second baby????
> Alena's almost one, and it's a possibility that we're having our second, but
> I've found myself petrified of the idea!
>
> Is this normal???

Yes, it's normal.   I can't speak from experience since Jelly Bean will be my
first, but I've heard plenty of friends/family express the sentiment.   If you
really want a second a baby, but the thought gives you the cold sweats, you
might look into hypnotherapy.   There's an exercise called fear release...

Marion
edd 10/16/2004
Ericka Kammerer - 21 Jun 2004 20:55 GMT
> Is it normal to be afraid to have a second baby????
> Alena's almost one, and it's a possibility that we're having our second, but
> I've found myself petrified of the idea!
>
> Is this normal???

    I think it depends on what you're afraid of,
precisely.  I do think many sorts of fears are normal
in this situation.  Fortunately, most are groundless ;-)

Best wishes,
Ericka
Katie - 21 Jun 2004 21:34 GMT
>Is it normal to be afraid to have a second baby????
>Alena's almost one, and it's a possibility that we're having our second, but
>I've found myself petrified of the idea!
>
>Is this normal???

Sounds normal to me :-)

Almost everything about having a second baby freaks me out right now.
DS is 7.5 months and is a wonderful, easy baby and, even so, I can't
imagine having another one anytime soon.

Jill's post pretty much summed up all of my reasons for not being
ready - the fears about how to deal with two small kids at once, time
management and routines, not being able to give all my attention to DS
anymore, etc.   I'm also nervous about pregnancy and labour.  My
pregnancy wasn't too bad but I know how bad I felt during the first
trimester and can't imagine going through that with a toddler to deal
with.  And I still have clear enough memories of labour that I REALLY
don't have any urge to do it again soon.  I was reading a birth story
the other day and it was the first time since DS was born that I had
any feeling that I might want to do it again sooner rather than later
(incidentally, it was Larry McMahan's story about the birth of his son
- beautiful story, Larry, if you're reading this!).

I'm pretty certain that I do want another baby.  I grew up as an only
child and don't regret it so I don't feel any particular need to
provide DS with a sibling but I would consider it maybe when he's
getting close to school age, or at least pre-school (e.g. 3-4 years
old).

Katie
Jill - 21 Jun 2004 22:09 GMT
"Katie" <sphyrapicus@fakeaddress.com> wrote
And I still have clear enough memories of labour that I REALLY
> don't have any urge to do it again soon.  >>

I have clear memories, but you know, I know I can handle another
labor....what makes me dread it is the fact that I have been SO impatient to
heal and get back to "normal"....it seemed like forever for the
discharge/(lochia?) to stop. if it was just a dya of labor and then all
systems go that would be on thing, but I was stitched up and aching and
stinging for weeks, the dissolvable stitches never all dissolved, I had to
pull some out!...I still can feel a little sore spot in the perineum area,
where those last stitches were and I still get a little achey in my very
lower back....

I think I'd agree to have a natural labor, which is something I have NEVER
had the intention of having (hence my complaints about my epidural wearing
off continually!!)...if somehow they could make that be it, and make it not
be 6 weeks of lochia and being sore and tender etc....actually, I bled red
for at least 4 weeks, when they told me that the red bloody looking stuff
should go away after a week and then it would just be a brown discharge etc.
etc.

It's been 6 weeks and I still am not fully recovered although I feel fine
enough.
Ericka Kammerer - 22 Jun 2004 03:08 GMT
> I think I'd agree to have a natural labor, which is something I have NEVER
> had the intention of having (hence my complaints about my epidural wearing
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> should go away after a week and then it would just be a brown discharge etc.
> etc.

    Idiots.  I don't know why "they" keep telling women
that ;-)  I've always had a solid six weeks of lochia, with
more than a week of red bleeding, and it sure seems like most
people I've heard from have had similar experiences.  At
the very least, I don't think they should say that just
because it's perfectly normal for it to be more than that!

    Anyway, while going unmedicated won't shorten the
lochia, with the right caregivers it certainly *can* make
the recovery easier.  I've had three births with *no*
stitches whatsoever, and I think that makes a huge difference
(and I think that going unmedicated makes a huge difference
in your ability to do what you need to do in order not to
tear or have an episiotomy).  The lochia's annoying, but
I think I would mind being in pain much more than lochia.

Best wishes,
Ericka
H Schinske - 29 Jun 2004 21:07 GMT
eek@comcast.net wrote:

>The lochia's annoying, but
>I think I would mind being in pain much more than lochia.

I think stuff like lochia is way more annoying when you're in pain *as well*.
If you were feeling fine it would probably not be too big a deal. I know that
now that my periods are pretty easy, I mind the actual bleeding far, far less
than I used to when I had cramps.

--Helen
Jenrose - 22 Jun 2004 09:09 GMT
> Is it normal to be afraid to have a second baby????
> Alena's almost one, and it's a possibility that we're having our second, but
> I've found myself petrified of the idea!
>
> Is this normal???

It is. For us, the whole "second baby" shock was softened by foster
parenting a newborn for 3 1/2 months. It made me *totally* eager to have one
of my own, because it worked so well *despite* the hassles of formula and
disposable diapers and daycare. I can't wait to have another baby that I can
actually *nurse*.

The thing about second babies--you're no longer a novice at handling
newborns. You've got an older kid distracting you from staring at the baby
every minute wondering when they're going to quit breathing--because you've
got living proof in front of you that yes, they do keep breathing...

Now my first "baby" just turned 11 yesterday, so that probably reduces my
fear somewhat. She was 8 when I did foster parenting. Very different from
having two that close together. I'd get a good sling and a good asian-style
back carrier, and be prepared to use them a LOT.

Jenrose
Ilse Witch - 22 Jun 2004 16:45 GMT
> Is this normal???

I found myself scared each time I got pregnant after having DS. At first
there's the excitement, but that immediately changed into "OMG, am I ready
for this? What if....". So yes, perfectly normal IMO.

Signature

-- I
mommy to DS (July '02)
mommy to three tiny angels (28 Oct'03, 17 Feb'04 & 20 May'04)
guardian of DH (33)

Leslie - 23 Jun 2004 15:11 GMT
>Is it normal to be afraid to have a second baby????

Am I right that you don't mean physically afraid of birth, but afraid of
dealing with a second child in addition to your first?

I'd say it's normal to be concerned about your ability to cope with two.  And
it IS a big adjustment--everyone I know with three or more says the biggest
adjustment is going from one to two.  I know it took me a couple of months to
figure out how to divide my attention between them.  Number one spent almost
all that time lying on the sofa watching Disney movies lent to us by a friend
non-stop!

But once I figured it out, it became much easier.  You can do it!

Leslie
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.